United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Water Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-86/075 Jan. 1987
oEPA         Project Summary

                    Dewatering  Wastewater
                    Treatment  Sludge
                    by  Clathrate  Freezing:
                    A  Bench-Scale
                    Feasibility  Study
                    Benjamin Molayem and Tevfik Bardakci
                      Preliminary investigations were con-
                    ducted on the technical feasibility  of
                    clathrate freezing applied to the dewater-
                    ing of municipal wastewater sludge. This
                    project has successfully demonstrated the
                    fundamental feasibility  of the process,
                    although contact times of 15 to 20 min-
                    utes were necessary to achieve high
                    dewatering. Also, other clathrating agents
                    should be examined. Considerable work
                    would still be required, therefore, for bring-
                    ing the process to full-scale commer-
                    cialization. The work was done under a
                    cooperative agreement  with the Metro-
                    politan Sewer District of Greater Cincin-
                    nati, Ohio, subcontracting to Benmol Cor-
                    poration,  who initially suggested  the
                    process.
                      This Project Summary was prepared by
                    EPA's Water Engineering Research Labor-
                    atory, Cincinnati, OH, to announce the
                    major findings of a project that is
                    documented in a separate report of the
                    same title (see Project Report ordering
                    information at back}.

                    The Process
                      The clathrate dewatering process would
                    use a liquid refrigerant to form a complex
                    with the water in sludge. The complex, or
                    clathrate as it is termed, freezes to form
                    a solid crystal. In the clathrate crystal,
                    molecules of water surround a molecule of
                    clathrating agent. The water and clath-
                    rating agent are likely held together by a
                    combination of intermolecular attractions
                    and crystal geometry that permits  the
                    trapping of one molecule within the voids
of another's crystal lattice. The clathrate
freezes at temperatures above the freez-
ing point of water. Therefore, if sludge is
immersed in an excess of clathrating agent
at a temperature between the freezing
points of the clathrating agent and water,
clathrate crystals could form without the
formation of ice crystals. It is proposed
that water inside sludge  particles and
cellular material will diffuse outward and
form clathrate crystals in the bulk liquid
phase, producing a suspension of totally
dehydrated sludge  particles, clathrate
crystals,  and the liquid clathrating agent.
It should  then be possible to separate the
clathrate crystals from the sludge solids
by virtue of their density difference, and
thus effect a water removal and dewater-
ing of the sludge. Upon melting of the
clathrate, water can be separated and
clathrating agent recycled to the process.
Easily liquified compounds that form clath-
rates with water include propane, many
Freons, other hydrocarbons  and gases,
and halogens.


Project  Objectives and Methods
  The objectives of this initial study were
to concentrate on the three following con-
cerns relating to technical feasibility:
  (1)  Extent  of clathrate  formation;
  (2) Ease of achieving phase separations
     required for the process; and
  (3) Extent to which water is removed
     from the bulk of the sludge solids.
In the preliminary  study of technical
feasibility, Freon-11 was used as the clath-

-------
   rating  agent. Although liquid propane
   would be preferred for a commercial pro-
   cess due to its lower cost, working with
   Freon-11 was much easier. Propane studies
   would  require  higher pressures, and
   propane  is  flammable. With  Freon-11
   experiments can be conducted nearer to
   normal laboratory conditions with con-
   siderably less complicated techniques.
     The  feasibility was investigated in  a
   simple apparatus where sludge and liquid
   Freon-11 were placed in a 1-liter test-tube
   shaped vessel, stirred with a laboratory
   mixer, and allowed to settle. The test-tube
   shaped vessel was immersed in a  1.5°C
   water bath. Primary, secondary, and mixed
   sludges were tested. The mixed sludge
   had a 60/40 volume ratio of primary-to-
   secondary sludge, typical of that processed
   at the  Mill  Creek  Treatment Plant  in
   Cincinnati.

   Results
     Average water removals by clathrating
   varied  between  48  and  97.9 weight
   percent (9.25-52.6% dry  solids in  the
   product), depending  upon contact time
   and sludge type.  Sludge was mixed with
   liquid Freon-11 for both 10 minutes at a
   time and also for as much as 20 minutes
   with the phases separating but remaining
   in contact for as long as 2 hours.  Single
   contacts and two-stage contacts (two
   repeated contacts of the sludge with pure
   Freon-11) were used. To obtain the  higher
   degrees of dewatering, the longer and/or
   two-stage contacts were necessary. Clath-
   rate crystals obtained were of two  types,
   a rather soft grayish crystal with a molar
   ratio (water to Freon-11) of about 17 to 1
   and a hard white crystal with a molar ratio
   of about  8  to  1. Procedures  could  be
        adjusted to obtain the latter kind of crystal
        which separated well under gravity. In
        summary, high water removals with good
        phase separations appeared to be possible.
          Although basic technical feasibility was
        shown, considerable work would still be
        required to develop the process to  the
        point  of commercialization.  First,  the
        conditions  favorable  for  high water
        removals need  to  be  more accurately
        defined. Next, studies would be desirable
        with less expensive propane rather than
        Freon-11, and phase separation  devices
        used in full-scale  processes,  such  as
        hydroclones,  should  be evaluated. A
careful economic analysis would also I
desirable. Even though the process doi
show possibilities, it is fairly complex wi
considerable development work still  r
quired. For the present, additional EF
funding is  not  planned,  but continuf
development by Benmol Corporation mi
take place.
  The full report was submitted in fulfi
ment of Cooperative Agreement No.  C
810549 by the Metropolitan Sewer Distri
of Greater Cincinnati, under the sponsc
ship of the U.S. Environmental Protecti<
Agency.
           Benjamin  Molayem  and  Tevfik Bardakci  are with  BENMOL  Corporation.
             Alexandria, VA 22314.
           Harry E. Bostian is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
           The complete report, entitled "Dewatering  Wastewater Treatment Sludge by
             Clathrate Freezing: A Bench-Scale Feasibility Study," (Order No. PB 86-239
             779/AS; Cost: $11.95, subject to change) will be available only from.
                   National Technical Information Service
                   5285 Port Royal Road
                   Springfield, VA22161
                   Telephone: 703-487-4650
           The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                   Water Engineering Research Laboratory
                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
                        BULK RATE
                   POSTAGE & FEES P
                           EPA
                      PERMIT No  G-3E
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-86/075
                                               0063240
                                               LOU  W  T
                                                                                60604

-------