United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory
Las Vegas NV89114
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-86/104 May 1987
SEPA         Project Summary
                    Seasonal  Variability  in  Prickly
                    Pear Creek Water Quality  and
                    Macroinvertebrate
                    Communities

                    Barry P. Baldigo, John R. Baker, Wesley L. Kinney, and Mike Fillinger
                      Prickly Pear Creek, Montana, was
                    sampled during four  seasons in 1982
                    and 1983 to attempt to relate biological
                    responses to fluctuations in discharge,
                    in-stream toxicity and  metal concentra-
                    tion in the water column. The biota
                    (macroinvertebrate) were definitely im-
                    pacted directly downstream from a
                    metal source during all seasons, but no
                    definite relationships among discharge,
                    metal concentration and biological  re-
                    sponse could be established on a sea-
                    sonal basis.
                      This Pro/ect Summary  was devel-
                    oped by EPA's Environmental Monitor-
                    ing Systems Laboratory,  Las Vegas,
                    NV, to announce key findings of the re-
                    search project that is fully documented
                    in a separate report of the same title
                    (see Project Report ordering informa-
                    tion at back).

                    Introduction
                      Prickly Pear Creek, Montana, was
                    studied by the U.S. EPA Environmental
                    Monitoring  Systems  Laboratory,  Las
                    Vegas, Nevada (EMSL-LV), during 1980
                    through 1983. This stream was of inter-
                    est because healthy  biota were  ob-
                    served throughout much of the system
                    even though concentrations of zinc,
                    copper and cadmium exceeded  the
                    acute aquatic life criteria several fold.
                    Stream surveys and  on-site toxicity
                    tests were conducted to investigate fac-
                    tors that enable sensitive organisms to
                    tolerate exposure to waters containing
                    concentrations of metals well in excess
                    of acute national aquatic life criteria. Ad-
                    ditional studies examined  persistence
and degradation of metal toxicity in
Prickly Pear Creek as revealed by the
downstream distribution of toxic metals
and the resultant response of the resi-
dent biota.
  These studies cited above and others
identified factors that affect organism-
ecosystem  toxic responses.  However,
not all factors are equally influential in
all aquatic systems, and it  is  important
to be able to identify the principal fac-
tors controlling metal availability and
toxicity in a given system.
  One factor that has generally been ig-
nored in  relating  metal concentrations
to in-stream toxicity and biological re-
sponses is seasonal variability in flow
and associated changes in water quality
and in the  biota. In some waterways,
toxicity may be greatest during periods
of high flow when metals are most sus-
ceptible to mobilization and transport to
surface water (e.g., streams receiving
drainage from mine tailings). Con-
versely, in the same system during low
flow periods, metal loading  to the
stream may be minimal, and the toxicity
may be greatly reduced. Knowledge of
these factors is crucial to enable water
managers to make intelligent decisions
regarding the issuance of  permits, the
allocation of waste loads, the designa-
tion of beneficial  uses, and the estab-
lishment of site-specific criteria and
standards.
  Consequently, a study was conducted
on Prickly Pear Creek to assess seasonal
variability in discharge, in water quality,
and in the biota. This summary and the
project report address that  study.

-------
Study Area
  Prickly Pear Creek forms its head-
waters  in the  Elkhorn  Mountains ap-
proximately 32 km southeast of Helena,
Montana and flows north for 64 km be-
fore entering Lake Helena and the Mis-
souri  River (Figure 1). Tailing and set-
tling  ponds remain as  prominent
features of historical gold mining opera-
tions  within the Corbin and Spring
Creek drainages  and release high con-
centrations of zinc, copper, and cad-
mium which are carried into Prickly Pear
Creek. Prickly  Pear Creek also under-
went extensive mining operations in the
early 1900's during which time over 75
percent of the stream was subjected to
stream-bed modifications  and dredg-
ing.
  The present  study reach was gener-
ally characterized by riffle flow and cob-
ble and gravel substrate.  The Prickly
Peak Creek annual discharge at the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) gaging sta-
tion (Figure 1) ranged from 30 to 343
cubic feet per second (cfs) with a mean
of 55 cfs during the 1982 to 1983 water
year. Spring Creek discharge during this
study  ranged from approximately 1 to
5 cfs.
  Four principal stations on Prickly Pear
Creek and one  station on Spring Creek
were utilized in this study  (Figure  1).
Spring Creek was  considered an
"effluent" site (012).  Station  011, up-
stream from the  confluence of Spring
Creek  and Prickly Pear Creek, was used
as a control. Stations 013 and 014 were
designated  impact zone sites, and sta-
tion 018 (and occasionally 014) was des-
ignated as a downstream recovery zone
site.

Methods
  Invertebrate populations and stream
water metal concentrations from Prickly
Pear Creek control, impact, and recov-
ery sites were sampled during 1982 and
1983.  Collections were  made during
July and December 1982 and April and
October 1983 to assess seasonal varia-
tions in discharge, temperature, runoff,
metal  concentrations, and invertebrate
communities. Water samples were also
collected from  Spring Creek during  all
seasons, however, invertebrate sam-
ples were only  taken during July 1982.
Commonly measured  water quality
parameters, were also recorded during
all seasons.
Water Quality
  During July 1982, triplicate water
samples for metals analyses were col-
                           Prickly Pear Creek. Montana
                                                          USGS
Figure 1.    Station locations on Prickly Pear Creek, Montana.
lected  at each station. Because very
little variability among replicates was
observed in these samples, during sub-
sequent samplings single samples were
collected  from each station. All metal
samples  were preserved with Ultrex
grade HN03 to pH <2.0. July 1982 sam-
ples were analyzed by Inductively Cou-
pled Plasma Optical Emission Spectra-
metric (ICP) methods. The detection
limits of  the ICP for all metals except
zinc and copper approached or ex-
ceeded ambient levels in the water
column, during  July 1982, hence, the
July data for cadmium, lead, silver and
arsenic should be viewed with this in
mind. For the other three periods zinc
and copper were analyzed by AA Flame;
cadmium, lead, and arsenic via AA Fur
nace; and silver via ICP.

Hydrology
  Stream  discharge was measured ai
each station during the July and Octo
ber surveys using a Marsh-McBirne>
Model 57 current meter. At each statior
flow at each of 20 intervals along a tran
sect was  measured at 6-tenth depth
The December 1982 and the April 198;
discharge was extrapolated from

-------
and October data and from  USGS
gauge values for these periods taken
about 3 km downstream from Station
18.

Macroinvertebrates
  A Portable Invertebrate Box Sampler
(PIBS) was used to collect five replicate
samples at each station from riffle zones
of uniform flow and velocity. Samples
were preserved and processed follow-
ing conventional techniques. Sorted in-
vertebrates were identified to the low-
est possible taxon, counted, and the
data entered into computer storage and
tabulated. A  reference collection of
identified  specimens is maintained at
EMSL-Las Vegas.

Results

Water Quality
  Data for metals of concern in  Prickly
Pear Creek, i.e. cadmium, lead,  zinc,
copper, silver, and arsenic, are summa-
rized in Table 1. This table suggests that
cadmium, lead, silver and  arsenic con-
tamination during July 1982 did not
originate  from Spring Creek because
control Station (011) concentrations ex-
ceeded those of the effluent (012) and/or
the receiving stream impact zones (sites
013 and 014). This apparent anomaly is
probably attributed to  analytical limita-
tions  of the  ICP instrument used for
analyses of the July 1982 samples. The
three metals that commonly exceeded
National Criteria were  Cadmium, Z inc,
and Copper,  hence, these  results con-
centrate principally on these metals.
  Cadmium levels in July of 1982 (Table
1) appeared elevated over  those which
occurred during the other three periods,
but were undoubtedly  a function of the
analytical  methods because the  values
reported for July approached the detec-
tion limits  of the ICP instrument used for
these analyses. However, cadmium
concentrations measured by AA fur-
nace were clearly  elevated in Spring
Creek and impact Station 013 over the
other stations during the other seasons
as well. Spring Creek produced elevated
levels of cadmium in Prickly Pear Creek
impact site 013, but a gradual reduction
to near control (011) levels was ob-
served at  sites 014 and 018  (Table 1).
The highest concentrations at all sta-
tions (excluding July 1982) occurred in
October 1983 during  low flow. April
(1983) and December (1982) concentra-
tions were considerably lower  at the
downstream sites (014, 018) than sum-
mer and fall values. Correlation analysis
Table 1.
Total Metal Concentrations From Prickly Pear Creek and Spring Creek Sites During
the Four Sampling Periods
                Date
                  011
012
                                                  013
                                                  014
018
Cadmium



Lead



Zinc



Copper



Silver



Arsenic



07/22/82
12/21/82
04/08/83
10/09/83
07/22/82
12/21/82
04/08/83
10/09/83
07/22/82
12/21/82
04/08/83
10/09/83
07/22/82
12/21/82
04/08/83
10/09/83
07/22/82
12/21/82
04/08/83
10/09/83
07/22/82
12/21/82
04/08/83
10/09/83
13
0.2
<.3
2.0
64
2.4
<1
13
71
21.9
40.5
100
20
<9
11.0
12.0
25
<7
<7
0.6
163
<2
<2
<2
17
5.4
6.0
7.6
29
242.5
246.6
72
2227
1128
1595
2119
119
80.7
67.8
84
24
<7
<7
1.6
90
46.4
26.9
27
19
2.4
2.6
5.0
119
84.3
66.1
30
454
431.1
640.7
580
33
37.0
25.3
28
9
<7
<7
1.9
87
16.7
10.3
6
10
0.7
0.9
4.0
52
16.4
18.1
19
221
212.2
320.9
236
13
22.0
11.7
14
6
<7
<7
0.2
61
4.0
4.5
4
10
0.3
0.2
3.0
51
8.6
5.7
15
128
134.5
138.4
203
15
13.0
<9
12
4
<7
<7
0.1
126
5.3
5.0
10
of USGS gauging station discharge data
and cadmium concentrations produced
correlation coefficients at sites 012 and
018 of  r = 0.94 and r = 0.93, respec-
tively.
  Very high zinc levels in Spring Creek
<1128to 2227 mj/l) resulted in substan-
tial increases in zinc concentrations in
Prickly Pear Creek (Table 1). Concentra-
tions downstream were progressively
reduced, but they never reached control
site levels. The highest concentrations
of zinc in Spring Creek occurred in July,
the period of highest discharge, and Oc-
tober the lowest discharge period. Dis-
charge values and zinc concentrations
at sites 012 and 018 did  not correlate
strongly (r = 0.53  and r = 0.43,  respec-
tively).
  Copper responded similarly  to zinc
(Table  1). Variations in concentrations
between sample periods within the
same sites were not pronounced. Im-
pact site (013) concentrations  ranged
from 25 to 37 |o,g/l, approximately twice
the control and final recovery site con-
centrations.  July concentrations  in
Spring Creek were slightly higher than
those of other seasons (Table 1). Corre-
lation coefficients for copper concentra-
tions and discharge values for stations
                             012 and 018 were r = 0.11 and r = 0.67,
                             respectively.
                               No consistent correlation with dis-
                             charge (positive or negative) was noted
                             with these three metals at the other sta-
                             tions. Spring Creek (012) concentrations
                             of all three metals correlated positively
                             with  discharge, but possibly this was
                             extraneous because of the small  num-
                             ber of paired data points.
                             Hydrology
                               During July 1982 flow was approxi-
                             mately two times  greater than  during
                             the other three periods. Flow during the
                             last three sampling periods was essen-
                             tially  uniform and ranged  from 38 to
                             42 cfs at the USGS gauge downstream
                             from  site 018.
                             Macroinvertebrates
                               Fifty-two macroinvertebrate taxa
                             were collected in Prickly Pear Creek dur-
                             ing the four seasons. Estimates  of
                             Shannon-Wiener diversity  (H'), Even-
                             ness (J) and Simpson's Dominance (D)
                             are provided in Table 2 for comparison
                             purposes.

-------
Table 2.   Mean Invertebrate Community Indices From Prickly Pear Creek During the Four Sampling Periods
         (Coefficients of Variation [Percent] are Noted in Parentheses).
Parameter
Mean Count
Richness

011
411
(53)
21
(36)
July
013
130
(51)
15
(14)
1982
014
103
(86)
10
(43)
December 1982
018
226
(15)
19
(8)
011
578
(21)
27
(10)
013
238
(17)
15
(17)
014
171
(34)
13
(23)
018
230
(23)
16
(19)
011
774
(10)
29
(17)
April 1983
013
460
(9)
19
(20)
014
556
(15)
16
(10)
018
516
(8)
22
(16)
on
298
(17)
20
(16)
October 1983
013
219
(24)
11
(6)
014
126
(33)
15
(26)
018
76
(26)
9
(26)
Diversity (H')
Evenness (J)
Dominance (D)
2.82
(12)
0.67
(9)
0.77
(5)
2.44
(5)
0.64
(9)
0.69
(5)
2.48
(18)
0.79
(11)
0.77
19)
2.92
(7)
0.69
(5)
0.80
(6)
3.36
(4)
0.71
(5)
0.84
(2)
2.59
(8)
0.66
(5)
0.73
(5)
2.90
(11)
0.78
(10)
0.81
(7)
3.12
m
0.79
(2)
0.84
(3)
3.62
(3)
0.75
(5)
0.88
(1)
2.81
(13)
0.66
(7)
0.80
(6)
2.40
(12)
0.60
(12)
0.65
(12)
2.97
(9)
0.67
(7)
0.74
(9)
3.43
(8)
0.79
(4)
0.86
(4)
2.08
(18)
0.60
(18)
0.62
(18)
3.15
(17)
0.81
(13)
0.83
(12)
2.6S
(15)
0.84
(4)
0.82
(7)
Control Zone (Station 011)
  Thirty-nine taxa were collected from
the riffles in the control zone during the
four sampling seasons. This  station
consistently provided higher mean total
numbers of  individual organisms  per
sample and higher mean and total num-
ber of taxa per season than the other
sampling stations (Table 2, Figures 2
and 3).
  Thirty-two  taxa were collected from
the riffle at station 011 during July when
the flow was greatest. The  ubiquitous
Baetis tricaudatus was very common,
comprising 38 percent of the total inver-
tebrate numbers at this site. Other com-
mon taxa (6 percent to 30 percent rela-
tive abundance) at this site included the
mayfly,  Epeorus longimanus,  and  the
midge subfamily, Orthocladiinae.
  The spring, pre-runoff  sampling
(April) produced both the highest total
number of taxa at 37 (Figure 2) and the
highest mean number of taxa per sam-
ple at 29. The highest mean  number of
individuals per sample encountered
during the study  (n = 774)  (Figure 3)
were collected during April at this sta-
tion. The most common organism col-
lected in April was the filter feeding cad-
disfly Arctopsyche grandis, which
comprised 22 percent of the total inver-
tebrate numbers at this site. Other com-
mon taxa in the spring included  the
mayfly, Beatis tricaudatus, with a mean
relative abundance of about 16 percent,
and the midge subfamily,  Othrocladi-
inae (11 percent), Glossosoma  sp.
(9 percent),  and Ephemerella  tibialis
(8 percent).
  The pattern of results for December
was similar to that observed in April,
although the mean total number of indi-
viduals per sample dropped by approxi-
mately one-third (Figure 3). Several rare
or occasional stoneflies captured in
April were not observed in December.
The composition of the dominant func-
tional groups changed little from  De-
cember to April.
  The macroinvertebrate community at
Station 011 appeared  most depressed
during fall (October) sampling. The
mean total number of individuals per
sample  was down approximately 60
percent from the spring, (Figure 3)  and
total number of taxa (Figure  2) and
mean taxa per sample were reduced by
about one-third. This may be a  natural
seasonal occurrence caused by recent
adult emergence and by the inability of
the PIBS net to retain  minute nymphal
instars. Nine taxa were found at Station
011 during the study that were not col-
lected at any other station.


Spring Creek (012)
  In July (1982) Spring Creek (012)  was
sampled to ascertain  the presence or
absence of fauna. Only five taxa and a
total of nine organisms were collected
from five  replicate samples. These in-
cluded Orthocladiinae midges and  a
single stonefly (Chloroperlidae), the
caddisfly, Arctopsyche grandis, the
crane fly, Tipula sp., and the water mite,
Sperchon sp. The low number  of taxa
and individuals in Spring Creek reflect
the extremely disturbed  nature of the
watershed and the concomitant  ele
vated metal levels.

Impact Zone (Stations 013 and
014)
  Thirty-three taxa were collected  dur
ing the four sampling seasons at Statior
013. The total number of taxa were rela
tiv.ely uniform at this  station durinc
April, July, and December (Figure 2)
However, during October the total num
ber of taxa was substantially reduced a
Station 013, and differences in the num
ber of taxa between control Station 01
and  impact station  were most pro
nounced during the October samplin;
(Figure 2). As was the  case at contrc
site 011, the mean number of individu
als per sample was highest in Apri
(n = 460) (Table 2, Figure 3). Decembei
October and July  values did not diffe
greatly in terms of numbers of individu
als (Table 2, Figure 3).
  Two species, Baetis tricaudatus  am
Arctopsyche grandis, predominated a
this station during all sample seasons
Combined, they made up 54 percent o
the total standing  crop  in July, 65  per
cent in December, 49 percent in April
and 72 percent in October. The onl'
other organisms that contributed sub
stantially  were Antocha sp., the Di
amesinae  midges, and the caddisfly
Brachycentrus sp.
  Twenty-eight taxa were collected  dur
ing the four seasons at Station 014, bu
unlike Station 013  no difference in tote
number of taxa was evident on a  sea
sonal basis (Figure 2). As was the cas
on the upstream stations,  the averag

-------
      40 -i
      30 J
   
-------
  I
  s
  1
  
-------
Pear Creek via Spring Creek near Jeffer-
son City, Montana. Principal metals of
concern were cadmium, copper and
zinc because their  concentrations in
Prickly Pear Creek waters exceeded the
national water quality criteria limits for
the protection of aquatic life. Elevated
levels of these three metals were
present in Prickly Pear Creek waters dur-
ing four seasons in the impact zone im-
mediately downstream from the Spring
Creek and Prickly Pear Creek  conflu-
ence.  Concentrations  downstream in
the recovery zone approached,  but did
not quite reach, levels  in the  unim-
pacted control zones.
  Stream discharge  during the  winter,
spring and fall  sampling  periods was
nearly uniform within each station. Dur-
ing the  summer sampling, however,
discharge levels were approximately
twice  those during other periods. Dur-
ing this high flow period, the  highest
concentrations of the  three metals in
Spring Creek water were recorded. Cad-
mium and zinc concentrations reached
their  next high levels during October
1983,  which was a period of low, stable
flow.  No pronounced trends in  copper
concentration were apparent on a sea-
sonal  or flow related basis.
  Macroinvertebrate communities were
definitely affected by the high levels of
metals in the impact zones. Reduction in
numbers of individuals, numbers of
taxa and related parameters were ap-
parent during all seasons in the reach
downstream from the Spring Creek dis-
charge.  Recovery of communities to
control station levels was not complete,
but this was judged  to be a function of
different habitats in the  downstream
reaches rather than  a  direct impact of
metals.  October data  were  somewhat
anomalous in that the second  impact
site showed an increase in total number
of taxa and the  recovery site showed a
reduction in number of taxa. In terms of
numbers of individuals, the fall data
were  also somewhat anomalous  as
total numbers of individuals progres-
sively decreased downstream, reaching
their  lowest densities  in the recovery
zone.
  Additional studies would be  needed
to clarify relationships  among dis-
charge, seasons, water quality and the
biota. Refinement of hydrological mea-
surements, use of consistent tech-
niques for metals analyses and some
adjustment of sampling periods would
be required to assure a high probability
of success in future studies.
Barry P.  Baldigo and John R. Baker are with Lockheed Engineering and
  Management Services, Inc., Las Vegas, NV 89109; the EPA author, Wesley
  L. Kinney (also the EPA Project Officer, see below), is with the Environmental
  Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas,  NV 89114; and Mike Fillinger
  is with Environmental Investigations Services Co., Helena. MT 59601.
The complete report, entitled "Seasonal Variability in Prickly Pear Creek Water
  Quality and Macroinvertebrate  Communities," (Order No. PB 87-129 300/
  AS; Cost: $11.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
       National Technical Information Service
       5285 Port Royal Road
       Springfield, VA 22161
       Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
       Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       P.O. Box 15027
       Las Vegas, NV89114

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-86/104
             OOOQ329    PS
                                              60604

-------