United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-87/029  Sept. 1987
SER&          Project  Summary

                    Effect of Capillarity  and  Soil
                    Structure  on  Flow in  Low
                    Permeability  Saturated
                    Soils  at  Disposal  Facilities
                    Forest 0. Mixon, Ashok S. Damle, Robert S. Truesdale, and C. Clark Allen
                      Some permit applications propose to
                    place hazardous waste land-disposal
                    facilities in saturated zones  of low-
                    permeability (low-K) soils. Naturally
                    occurring soils of this type  are fre-
                    quently anisotropic and heterogene-
                    ous. Heterogeneities may be of lower
                    or higher permeability than the sur-
                    rounding soils, and may range from
                    small, isolated-pockets to large, inter-
                    connected zones. Low-K heterogene-
                    ities, particularly those extending long
                    distances perpendicular to the flow
                    direction, can retard  flow.  High-K
                    heterogeneities, particularly those
                    extending long distances horizontally
                    or vertically to a location in or  near the
                    underlying aquifer, can result in rapid
                    migration of any pollutants reaching
                    these zones. Anisotropies in hydraulic
                    conductivity can range across several
                    orders of magnitude, resulting in rapid
                    migration of facility releases.
                      The final report addresses the move-
                    ment of the leachate after release from
                    the facility and does not consider those
                    factors  relating to the containment
                    afforded by the facility proper. Discus-
                    sions include (1) soil characteristics and
                    the influence soil-forming mechanisms
                    have on the types of  heterogeneities
                    and anisotropies to be expected in low-
                    K soil;  (2) the roles  played by the
                    tension-saturated zone, anisotropies,
                    and heterogeneities  in subsurface
                    leachate movement; and (3) the advan-
                    tages and  disadvantages of  various
                    available computer models to simulate
                    leachate movement in the saturated.
low-K anisotropic, and heterogeneous
cases.
  This Project Summary was devel-
oped by EPA's Hazardous Waste Engi-
neering Research Laboratory, Cincin-
nati, OH, to announce key findings of
the research project that is fully doc-
umented in a separate report of  the
same title (see Project Report ordering
information at back).

Introduction
  The EPA draft guidance document
prepared to accompany the July  26,
1982, regulations for  hazardous waste
management  recommends that liner
systems be constructed wholly above the
seasonal high water table, that is, in the
unsaturated soil. The document further
states that "a case-by-case demonstra-
tion of containment will be necessary for
landfills located wholly or partially in the
saturated zone."  In all likelihood, permit
applications will be  received which
propose  to locate hazardous waste
disposal facilities in a saturated zone of
low permeability  (low-K) soil.
  The objective  of this project was to
assess the  effects of heterogeneities,
anisotropies, and the tension-saturated
zone with  respect to movement of
subsurface  leachate releases in satu-
rated low-Ksoils. Soil characteristics and
the influence of soil-forming mecha-
nisms on the types of heterogeneities
and anisotropies  to be expected in low-
K soils are  discussed. The advantages
and disadvantages of generic types of
computer models for application to

-------
leachate movement in saturated, low-K
soils are addressed. The basic require-
ments  for adequate  modeling and the
data input needed to solve the models
are identified and described. Two avail-
able computer  programs  are used to
obtain sample model simulations and to
generally demonstrate  the usability of
these and other codes based on similar
computational techniques for prediction
of contaminant migration in low-K soils.
These models, however, do not consider
the tension-saturated zone. Also,  het-
erogeneities considered in the simula-
tions are  assumed  to be continuous
rather than localized.
  The  role played  by the tension-
saturated  zone  in subsurface leachate
movement was  approached by formula-
ting the hydrodynamics as a modification
of classical free surface techniques. The
equations of motion  of  ground-water
flow in the vicinity of an excavation were
formulated to permit analytical determi-
nation of the free surface (i.e., the shape
of the top of the capillary fringe) and the
effects of  capillarity on this shape and
on the entire flow network.

Approach

Modeling of Leachate
Migration in  Saturated
Low-K Soils
  In general, contaminants that are
soluble in ground water migrate by
miscible transport processes. Transport
mechanisms  such as convective trans-
port, mechanical dispersion, and molec-
ular diffusion  as well  as physico-
chemical interactions between the soil
and the contaminant species are impor-
tant in determining the quality of ground
water.  The interactions include adsorp-
tion/desorption  of  the  contaminant
species on soil  particles as well as
chemical reactions between soil chem-
icals  and  contaminants  (e.g.,  ion
exchange). Aqueous leachates gener-
ated by land disposal of liquid and solid
wastes migrate by such miscible trans-
port mechanisms and form a large class
of  typical ground-water contamination
problems. Liquid  contaminants that are
insoluble  in  ground water are trans-
ported by immiscible  (or multiphase)
transport processes. The present discus-
sion is limited to miscible contaminant
transport processes.
   In saturated  environments,  ground-
water flow generally obeys Darcy's law,
which states that flow velocity is propor-
tional to both the hydraulic gradient and
hydraulic conductivity of the soil. Com-
plications arise from the heterogeneous
and anisotropic nature of soils because
the hydraulic conductivity  is  usually
variable in space and also dependent on
the flow direction. The  dispersion  and
diffusion of the contaminant species are
expressed by  Pick's law, which, when
combined with convective flux, give the
net migration  flux of the  contaminant
species. The  governing conservation
equations,  when combined with  flux
relations, reduce to  a set of  coupled,
nonlinear, second-order partial differen-
tial  equations—one describing  the
ground-water  and flow and the other
characterizing the migration of chemical
species.
  These equations are then solved using
appropriate initial and boundary condi-
tions  and system parameters to obtain
flow  and  concentration profiles.  The
boundary conditions are usually of two
types: (1)  specified  functional values
(e.g.,  head  or concentration  values  at
specified locations); and (2) specified flux
values (e.g., water flow rate or mass flux
of solute). To solve the transient equa-
tions, initial functional values of head or
concentration  over the entire region are
also required. For dilute solutions, the
ground-water  density may be assumed
to be constant and independent of solute
concentration, thus uncoupling the  flow
and transport equations.
  Available computer simulation codes
are based on either analytical or numer-
ical solutions to the above equations in
one-, two-,  three-dimensional form. The
level  of complexity  is a function  of
geometry, heterogeneity of the porous
matrix, anisotropy, and transport mech-
anisms represented. Generally,  the
energy transport equation is ignored,
although it may be significant in a few
special cases. The  flow  and  solute
transport  equation  are  generally
assumed to  be uncoupled, and  most
chemical transport  models  assume a
binary system (i.e., one  contaminant of
importance in  ground water).
  The accuracy of any solution depends
on the accuracy of  various parameters
incorporated into the equations. For flow
problems, the critical parameters are soil
hydraulic conductivity and porosity. To
account for heterogeneities and anisot-
ropies, vertical and  horizontal compo-
nents of the hydraulic conductivity need
to be provided over the entire flow region.
Compressibility of the soil and fluid are
combined in a single parameter, specific
storage. The critical parameters in solu
transport problems are the hydrodynam
dispersivities and molecular diffusk
coefficients  for the  solute  species
interest. The hydrodynamic dispersivi
is  essentially a  property of the flu
velocity and the porous matrix, and it
often dependent  on  flow direction.
addition, the attenuation mechanism
such as adsorption and chemical rea
tions, if important, need to be expressf
by suitable attenuation coefficients. (
all these  parameters,  the  attenuatic
coefficients are  the most difficult
obtain.  However,  this problem  may I
avoided by considering the worst cas
of  no attenuation. This is applicable •
the conservative specie that is expectf
to  migrate the farthest.
  Most computer simulations treat th
dispersion coefficient the same as tr
diffusion coefficient. Although the diffi
sion  and dispersion terms are added 1
obtain overall dispersion coefficient
there is a significant difference betwee
them. Diffusion is a molecular phenort
enon and allows  the flow of contam
nants against the direction  of  grounc
water flow. Mechanical  or hydrodynam
dispersion arises  from the uneven flo<
and division of flow of water as it move
through  soil particles. The  dispersio
depends on flow velocity and soil matr
and may mathematically be expressed b
diffusion-type  equations.  But unlik
molecular  diffusion, the mechanic!
dispersion does not allow flow of cor
taminants  against the  ground-wate
flow. This problem is less significant fc
convection-dominant solute transpo
processes.  For dispersion-dominate
cases, any  prediction  of contaminar
migration against  the ground-water flo\
direction should by viewed with  cautior
  In  low-K soils,  where flow velocitie
are low, molecular diffusion may becom
a dominant solute transport mechanisrr
Theoretically,    the   hydrodynamic
dispersion coefficient is proportional t
the  flow  velocity, the proportionalit
constant being called dispersivity, a. (I
a  simple  form,  the  longitudins
hydrodynamic-dispersion coefficient, D
=  BL |V|, and  the transverse  hydrc
dynamic-dispersion  coefficient,  DT = a
|V|.)  Thus, at sufficiently low velocitie!
the molecular diffusion coefficient ma
become greater than DL and DT.

-------
 Special Considerations
  The primary concern in modeling the
flow and solute transport in  saturated
low-K soils is the presence of  heteroge-
neities in these soils. Because of the high
resistance of low-K soils to ground-water
flow, the effects of nonuniformities such
as  stratified permeable sand  layers,
fractures, and fissures  become very
important as  these  provide  the low-
resistance path to leachate flow. For very
low-K soils with hydraulic conductivity
less than 1 Cf9 cm/sec, almost all the flow
may  be   expected   through   such
nonuniformities.
  Any applicable model must  be able to
represent these nonuniformities ade-
quately. Finite element models offer an
advantage in this respect, as they can
better accommodate uneven distribution
of heterogeneities. Simulation of frac-
tures present special problems as these
represent extreme discontinuity  in the
soils with porosity equal to unity, and the
ground-water flow equation may  not be
strictly applicable in such a case.
  A second important consideration in
low-K soils is  the contribution  of the
molecular diffusion  process  to  solute
transport. For very low flow  velocities,
such as 10"* cm/sec (e.g., with K = 10~7
cm/sec and hydraulic gradient = 0.01),
the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient
may become smaller than the  molecular
diffusion coefficient which is  usually in
the range of 10"5to 10"8cm2/sec. In such
cases, molecular diffusion may represent
a dominant transport mechanism over
advection and hydrodynamic dispersion.
Applicable models  should,  therefore,
include a molecular diffusion term in the
solute  transport equation,  along with
advection and hydrodynamic dispersion
contributions.  Also,  the  hydrodynamic
dispersivity data for low-K  soils are
generally not available, and data on other
soils may indicate higher values.  Based
on laboratory experiments, low values of
dispersivities may be expected for uni-
form low-K soils.
  Another aspect of simulations of low-
K soils is the large time increment and
time scales involved. Long time periods
may be required for significant advance-
ment of the  concentration  front. Over
such long periods, the boundary  condi-
tions may  become  variable and  time-
dependent. Examples of these boundary
conditions are the concentration and flux
of solute species at the source and the
prevailing hydraulic gradients in the flow
region. In such situations, models incor-
porating variable, time-dependent boun-
dary conditions may be desirable.

Sample Model Simulations
  Two available  computer programs
were  used  to obtain sample model
simulations and to demonstrate gener-
ally the usability of these and other codes
based on similar computational tech-
niques for predicting contaminant migra-
tion in low-K, saturated soils:

1.  SEFTRAN—Simple and Efficient
    Flow and Transport—code deve-
    loped by Huyakorn of Geotrans, Inc.
    This model is based on finite element
    techniques and can allow rectangu-
    lar or triangular elements for flexible
    geometry.

2.  Two-dimensional U.S.  Geological
    Survey Model developed by Konikow
    and Bredehoeft of USGS. This model
    is based on finite  difference tech-
    niques and uses  the method of
    characteristics to solve  the solute
    transport equation.

  Both programs  provided analyses of
two-dimensional fluid flow and contam-
inant  transport in areal/cross-sectional
configuration of saturated heterogene-
ous and  anisotropic  media.  The solute
transport part can take into  account
convection,  hydrodynamic dispersion,
equilibrium adsorption,  and first-order
decay processes.  The SEFTRAN model
takes  into account molecular diffusion,
whereas this term is ignored in the
USGS-2D model.
  Contaminant migration through low-K
soils  may be described as a two-step
process. In the first step, the contaminant
migrates vertically through saturated
low-K soils to an  underlying aquifer or
a more permeable zone. In the second
step, the  contaminant entering the more
permeable zone or aquifer is transported
horizontally away from the source. These
two steps were simulated with the above
mentioned codes.
  The first sample  model  simulation
studied vertical migration of a  contam-
inant  from  a hazardous waste land
disposal facility to an underlying aquifer
through saturated low-K soil. The SEF-
TRAN code was used for this case, and
the effects of heterogeneity  and aniso-
tropy  of the soil were examined in this
simulation. The heterogeneity was sim-
ulated by  introducing a  thin, highly
permeable, continuous sand  layer in an
otherwise homogeneous low-K soil. Also
simulated was the case of very low-K of
soils  with  and  without molecular
diffusion.
  In the second sample model simula-
tion, horizontal migration of contami-
nants from the landfill site through an
underlying aquifer was simulated using
the USGS2D model. Here also the effects
of heterogeneity and anisotropy of the
permeable aquifer were studied.

Conformal Mapping
  As  stated  previously,  of particular
interest is that situation where a landfill,
surface impoundment,  or waste  pile
would be located in saturated low-K soil.
A facility so  located  would tend to
influence local flow dynamics, including
the water table and the capillary fringe
(tension-saturated zone).
  The  problem to be  addressed  is a
disposal facility sited such that its lower
surface is  beneath  the normal water
table. As in a  well, there is a tendency
for ground water to flow into the exca-
vation. A complicating factor, however,
is capillary attraction, which draws fluid
into the soil  interstices and creates a
zone of negative pressure, the capillary
fringe or tension-saturated zone.
  In the capillary  fringe, the  region
between  the water  table  and free sur-
face,  the physical  picture  is that of
individual granules whose  interstices
contain no significant vapor bubbles. This
zone  is  normally  referred  to as the
tension-saturated zone or  the negative
pressure zone. Within  this zone the
pressure  ranges from atmospheric (P =
0) at the water table to some negative
value (P = -Hc)  at the free surface, where

    P = Manometer  pressure in  head
        units,  L

   Hc = Equilibrium capillary rise, L.

  Above the top of the capillary fringe,
the physical  appearance is  that of
individual granules whose interstices are
filled primarily  with vapor or gas bubbles.
This region is  referred to as the unsat-
urated zone and  its moisture  content
normally  decreases with  elevation or
increases with depth. Fluid motion in the
unsaturated zone is not addressed in this
report.
  In order to assess the effects of the
capillary fringe on the fluid flow patterns
in the  neighborhood of the excavation,
the equations of motion for the flow field

-------
are formulated and  solved  with the
capillary pressure, Hc, as an adjustable
parameter. Comparative analysis of the
solutions for various  values of the
capillarity reveal and quantify its effects.
  Classical potential theory, which app-
lies here,  in which the flow is propor-
tional to the gradient of some potential,
provides a relatively easily visualizable
and familiar representation of the flow
field in the form of the flow net. This net
is comprised of lines of constant potential
and orthogonal, or  perpendicular, lines
of constant stream function. The lines of
constant  stream  function, or stream
lines,  represent particle tracks  in steady
flow; hence no fluid flows across  these
lines. Any two such lines form  a stream
tube,  through which  the  total flow  is
constant.
  Imagine  that the lines of  constant
potential and flow lines are drawn  on an
infinitely stretchable thin sheet of rubber.
Imagine moreover that this rectangular
piece  of  rubber  is  positioned  and
deformed  so  that  the lateral edges
correspond to the centerline of the
excavation, the bottom of the pit, and the
free surface. If this stretching is done in
such a way that angles are preserved,
e.g., conformally,  then the  resulting
curvilinear network comprising the (now
deformed) lines of constant potential and
constant stream function  represents a
new flow field, the one sought in this
study.
  Conformal mapping is a mathematical
formalism for accomplishing this stretch-
ing. In a typical application, a simple flow
configuration  (a rectangle) is mapped
onto a more complicated geometry (the
disposal facility) in such a  way that the
important mathematical features of the
flow net are preserved and the  resulting
curvilinear flow net is a  theoretically
accurate representation of  the flow field
in the  more  complex  geometry. The
mathematical formalisms are developed
and solutions presented from which the
behavior at various values of the  capil-
larity can be compared.
  A simple mathematical transformation
converts the  isotropic  solution to an
anisotropic one  through coordinate
stretching. The effects of anisotropy are
examined. Heterogeneities  can  also
influence flow. A local heterogeneity can
be of  two types,  either more or less
conducting than the adjacent soil  struc-
ture. Conformal mapping techniques are
used in this project to examine flow paths
in the neighborhood  of both  types  of
structure.
Findings
1.  Soils frequently exhibit anisotropic
    flow behavior in that the horizontal
    hydraulic  conductivity is greater
    than the vertical. This phenomenon
    can increase the net flow substan-
    tially at a  given  hydraulic  gradient
    as a result of the more open horiz-
    ontal flow path for liquid motion. For
    example,  a  fourfold  full  force
    increase in horizontal conductivity
    can increase the net flow at a given
    hydraulic gradient by approximately
    fourfold over the isotropic situation.

2.  Heterogeneities and anisotropy are
    common in naturally occurring low-
    K soils. The heterogeneities  can
    range  from small, isolated pockets
    to  large, continuous or connected
    regions   with  high   hydraulic
    conductivities.

3.  Since  interconnected  secondary
    porosity can significantly increase
    the average hydraulic conductivity of
    a low-K soil, these zones must be
    mapped if subsurface leachate
    migration  is  to be adequately
    modeled or a landfill sited with any
    assurance  of contaminant contain-
    ment by the natural  low-K soil (in
    the event of a failure in the primary
    liner).

4.  Several ground-water  transport
    models applicable to movement of
    leachate releases in saturated low-
    K soils that are heterogeneous and/
    or anisotropic are available. Numer-
    ical models that  employ finite  ele-
    ment and/or  method of character-
    istics are the most applicable. None
    of the models have been verified for
    this case by comparison to actual
    field conditions.

5.  The analysis shows that the effect
    of capillarity is to drawfluid vertically
    into the soil  interstices and thence
    to open the area through which fluid
    can flow into the excavation. Capil-
    larity thus causes the flow into an
    excavation to increase over the no
    capillarity case; the magnitude of the
    increase can be on the order of 10
    to 20 percent of  the total flow and
    is  higher for  higher hydraulic  gra-
    dients.

6.  Heterogeneities, such  as joints,
    fissures, animal and root holes, and
    silt and sand seams can occur in a
    soil and can cause an increase
    several orders of  magnitude in tl
    average hydraulic conductivity of
    low-K  soil.  Heterogeneities  wi
    high hydraulic conductivity,  e.i
    sand lenses, root holes and fissure
    are  of most significance when th
    extend for a large distance, allowii
    rapid  migration of  pollutants th
    reach the heterogeneity.  Heterog
    neities with  low hydraulic condu
    tivities, e.g.,  rocks, are of mo
    significance  when they extend for
    large distance  perpendicular to tl
    direction of flow.  In this configur
    tion, migration is retarded.

7.  Conformal mapping  is capable
    providing the details of the f low fiel
    e.g., the velocities at all locatioi
    surrounding the  disposal  facilil
    This velocity field can be used
    conjunction  with  other  numeric
    models  in  the analysis of  othi
    phenomena of interest; namel
    diffusional transport superimpose
    upon  the convective  flow  fiel
    adsorptive and desorptive intera
    tion of contaminants in the grour
    water  with  local soils,  reactiv
    degradation  of possible contam
    nants catalyzed by  mineral  matti
    within  the  soil or otherwise, ar
    contaminant transport  times fro
    the disposal facility to the surface i
    to adjacent bodies of water.

-------
    Forest O. Mixon, Ashok S. Damle, Robert S. Truesdale, and C. Clark Allen
      are with Research Triangle Institute. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Jonathan G. Herrmann is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
    The complete report entitled "Effect of Capillarity and Soil Structure on Flow
      in Low Permeability Saturated Soils  at Disposal Facilities," (Order No. PB
      87-180 576/AS; Cost: $18.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-87/029
             0000329   PS

             U  S  £«VI8  PROTECTION
             REGION  5  LIBRARY
             230  S  0£AR8CRH  STREET
             CHICAGO               IL   60604

-------