United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
 Hazardous Waste Engineering
 Research Laboratory
 Cincinnati OH 45268
                    Research and Development
 EPA/600/S2-87/037  Aug. 1987
4>EPA         Project Summary

                    An  Evaluation  of Pristine
                    Lignin for  Hazardous
                    Waste Treatment
                    Daniel J. O'Neil, Christopher J. Newman, E. S. K. Chian, and H. Gao
                      A feasibility study was conducted to
                    assess the utilization of lignin, isolated
                    from a steam-exploded  hardwood
                    (Tulip poplar) with 95% ethanol and
                    0.1N NaOH, as a potential adsorbent
                    for hazardous waste treatment. Eight
                    organic compounds and two heavy
                    metals were selected to allow compar-
                    ison of lignin isolates with activated
                    carbon.
                      Adsorption kinetic studies, adsorp-
                    tion size studies, and adsorption iso-
                    therms based on the Freundlich equa-
                    tion were completed. The lignin isolates
                    were extensively characterized using
                    instrumental  and  classical  wet
                    techniques.
                      It was found that  the adsorption
                    capacity of lignin for heavy  metals
                    (chromium and lead) is comparable to
                    activated carbon, despite a huge diver-
                    gence  in surface area (0.1  ma/g vs.
                    1000 mVg). The surface area discrep-
                    ancy and the extensive aromatic sub-
                    stitution  in lignin macromolecule
                    impeded the achievement of an adsorp-
                    tion capacity of lignin for polar organic
                    compounds, which would allow  it  to
                    be cost-competitive with activated
                    carbon, although results with  phenol
                    and, to a  lesser degree, naphthalene
                    indicate significant potential for
                    achieving  competitive  capacities.  A
                    recommended plan for surface area and
                    structural enhancement is presented on
                    the basis that lignin can be developed
                    as an effective and low-cost adsorbent
                    for polar priority pollutants and/or  as
                    an ion-exchange resin for heavy metal
                    wastewater cleanup.
  This Project Summary  was devel-
oped by EPA's Hazardous Waste Engi-
neering   Research   Laboratory,
Cincinnati, OH, to announce key find-
ings of the research project that is fully
documented in a separate report of the
same title (see Project Report ordering
information at back).

Introduction
  An innovative process for the capture
and concentration of hazardous waste
compounds,  such as heavy  metals,
organic acids, ketones, etc., which are
found  in aqueous waste streams has
been proposed. The process involves the
use of a "pristine lignin" which Georgia
Tech investigators had demonstrated as
being readily isolated from woody wastes
and raw  materials  by hydrothermal
treatment  and solvent extraction.  The
production process (Figure 1) in which
the  lignin  is produced as a  by-product
during production  of sugars from the
cellulose fraction of  lignicellulose  raw
materials (and subsequent conversion to
fuel-grade ethanol)  appeared to be
economically feasible. Indeed, the eco-
nomics would be enhanced by a volume
market for the lignin co-product (which,
otherwise would be used principally for
process fuel). All requisite process
equipment for production was commer-
cially available.
  Unlike "commercial lignins," the
"pristine lignin" is a clean, tractable,
relatively low-molecular weight polymer
with an expected high degree of organic
functionality,  unadultered by adventi-
tious impurities. As such it was consid-

-------
               Vent      Steam   C

                    C W /*0      '
              •  v f—-*&3~Sewer
            Gf"0 fagot" Wash
             Stea^Q,   Water
                 Water I
      Conveyor}  Soluble]Unin.
              \Extractor\ Extract. fofyeT]
                                                                               C.W.
                                                                            Solvent '
                                                                            Recovery
                                                                            Column
                                          Hot ETOH
                                              to
                                          Extractor

                                   ETOH Solvent
                                   Storage Tank
                                      wiisceiia to       •      {   i
                                     .. SCP Production	) ETOH to
                                                             Stnranf*
                                                        Waste
                                                  Lignin Water
                                                 to Boiler
                                           Knockout
    Storage Bin

              /.._.
                Water
        Digester Water/
        Storage Tank
R.R. Unloader
                      Sludge   'Dilute   Concentrated
         • Ji^hfn^S--r°Boiler.Sol. Tank'Sol. TankJ
          riasn ururn            *-       ~
                                                          "Sewer
       From Rectifying Tower
                                            Reflux Level Drum
\from
j Concentrated
* Solution
• Tank
          Yeast
         Nutrient
           Grit
             Slaker
             System
                                         Sugar
                                         Solution
                                         Cooler
Second Stage
Fermentation
            Beer Feed
               Tank
Figure  1.
            |   Cir-^  Sugar  \First Stage
          Sludge Clarifier Solution(Fermenta-.
          To Disposal     Storage  tion

The GIT Process.
                                                           Yeast
                                                           Recycled
 I  Rectifying
J*X  Column
pr
^-^
   Pentose
                                                                                                         Legend
                                                                                                          -Q~ Pump
                                                                                                          fa Centrifuge
                                                                                                          •§  Reboiler
                                                                                                          M  Valve
                                                                                                          •&• Condenser
                                                                                                         C.W.
                                                                                                          •0- Heater
                                                                                                         Steam
                                                                                                             1000ODT/1
                                                                                                             Ethanol Plai
                                                               To ETOH
                                                               Storage
                                               To Fusel
                                              Oil Storage
ered that the pristine  lignin could be
employed, in one of three general ways,
with or without chemical modification,
viz.,

1.  Adsorption
2.  Ion-exchange chromatography and
    electron-exchange chromatography
3.  Precipitation/Coagulation/
    Flocculation

The principal economic merit of treating
hazardous wastes with lignin was fore-
cast to be its low cost, particularly when
compared to adsorbents such as  acti-
vated  carbon and  commercial  ion-
exchange resins (see Table 1).
                  Table 1,    Costs of Lignin and Alternatives
                  Water Treatment Chemical
                    Cost
                 Activated carbon             $ 1.19/kg
                 Ion-exchange resins           2.87/kg
                 Coagulants                  0.20/kg
                 Lignin (fuel value)             0.03/kg
                 Lignin fas ligniosulfonate)      0.13/kg
                    The  U.S.  Environmental Protection
                  Agency (EPA) estimated that,  without
                  regeneration, carbon adsorption costs as
                  high as $0.42/1000 gallons for a one-
                  MGD plant would be incurred, i.e.,  an
                                                                      annual cost of $153,000. Since the bulk
                                                                      density  of Filtrasorb 300 and 400 acti-
                                                                      vated carbon averages 433  kg/cu.m.,
                                                                      and pristine lignin ranges from 336 kg/
                                                                      cu.m. (ethanolic) to 606 kg/cu.m. (alka-
                                                                      line),  adsorbent vessels should  be sim-
                                                                      ilarly sized.  Therefore, capital  costs
                                                                      should  be  approximately  the  same
                                                                      assuming different levels of comparative
                                                                      efficiency,  it was forecast that  lignin
                                                                      could be competitive with  activated
                                                                      carbon if it demonstrated only 1 /15th the
                                                                      adsorption  capacity of the  activated
                                                                      carbon.  (Note: a median cost  of $0.08/
                                                                      kg for lignin was assumed.) This cost
                                                                      comparison is  summarized in Table 2.
                                                                      If  one  were to proceed  in  a  similar

-------
Table 2.    Comparison of Lignin Costs at
           Various   Efficiency  Levels
           Relative to Activated Carbon
Efficiency
Twice as efficient
Equal efficiency
1/2 efficiency
1/4 efficiency
1/10 efficiency
1 /1 5 efficiency
Activated Carbon
Metric Tons
Required
64
128.5
257
514
1285
1928
128.5
Annual
Materials
Cost
$ 5.120
10,280
20,560
41.120
102.800
154,000
153,000
manner to compare  lignin with ion-
exchange resins, well-over a 20-fold raw
material cost advantage is  possible  on
a simple equivalency basis.
  "Pristine lignin" is  considered to  be
exceptionally attractive for  several
reasons:

  1.   Low cost

  2.   Readily disposable after  use  by
      incineration, pyrolysis/gasifica-
      tion, and  biological (white  rot
      fungus) decomposition.

  3.   Metals  readily   reclaimable after
      treatment with lignin.

  4.   Biologically resistant.

  5.   High resistance to degradation/
      depolymerization.

  6.   Naturally abundant  in  nature;
      coniferous woods (28%), rice hulls
      (40%),  barley  straw  (16-22%),
      bagasse (20%).

  7.   High rich  organic functionality,
      e.g , phenolic hydroxyl groups  on
      the aromatic nuclei. Also, quinonic
      groups, carboxylic acid  groups,
      carbonyl moieties, etc.

  8.   Cation  complexation,  i.e.,  heavy
      metal trapping.

  9.   Organic complexation, e.g., simple
      phenols, etc.

 10.   Oxidation-reduction   exchange
      potential due to quinone and diphe-
      noquinone groups  possible,  i.e.,
      reduced ionic mobility.

 11.   No need  for radical  engineering
      redesign with this technology.
 12.  Relatively well established science
     and  technology base for  lignin
     modification.

 13.  Modified versions can range from
     aqueous solubility (pH-controlled)
     to organic-soluble.

 14.  Existing, though small, commercial
     markets for crude  lignin  exist.
     (Most  all lignin by-products of
     pulping processes are burned and
     most of the heat generated from
     the lignin is required to evaporate
     the water from the spent liquor.)

 15.  Crude  alkali lignin and lignosulfo-
     nate products  have  been used as
     emulsifiers,  protective colloids to
     stabilize emulsions, in ore flotation,
     electrolytic refining, and industrial
     wastewater treatment. Sequester-
     ing action is used to remove scums
     and  insoluble salts in hard water.
     Lignosulfonates react with chrom-
     ates and dichromates  to  give
     strongly insoluble materials.

The focus  of this research  was to
concentrate  on the  use of lignin as an
adsorbent and a  replacement  for acti-
vated carbon. It was expected to atten-
uate heavy  metals and  organic  com-
pounds (especially, polar compounds) in
a mechanism not unlike that of humic
acids in nature. The research centered
on three phases:

  1   Isolation of pristine  lignin  from
     steam-exploded wood;
  2.  characterization,  chemically  and
     physically, of the lignin; and
  3.  adsorption  studies  of lignin  and
     comparison with activated carbon.

  A  feasibility study to assess the
utilization of  lignin,  isolated from a
steam-exploded hardwood (Tulip poplar)
with 95%  ethanol and 0.1 N NaOH, as a
potential adsorbent for hazardous waste
treatment  was conducted. Eight organic
compounds and two heavy  metals ions
were selected from the EPA priority
pollutant list for use as model compounds
and to allow comparison of lignin isolates
with activated carbon.
  Adsorption kinetic studies, adsorption
size  studies, and  adsorption isotherms
based on the Freundlich equation  were
completed.  The  lignin  isolates were
extensively characterized  using IR, UV,
C13 NMR,  and PMR spectroscopy,  elec-
trochemical  functional group  analysis
 (Van Krevelen  diagrams),  differential
 scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric
 analysis, elemental (C, H, N) analysis, gel
 permeation chromatography,  and  BET
 surface area analysis. Carbon adsorption
 isotherms were produced for compounds
 not reported in the literature.
   The adsorption capacity of  lignin for
 heavy metals (chromium and  lead)  was
 found comparable  to activated carbon,
 despite a huge divergence in surface area
 (0.1 m2/g vs. 1000 mVg). The surface
 area discrepancy  and the extensive
 aromatic substitution in lignin  macro-
 molecule impeded the achievement of an
 adsorption capacity of  lignin  for polar
 organic compounds. This would allow it
 to  be cost-competitive  with  activated
 carbon,  although  results with  phenol
 and,  to  a  lesser degree, naphthalene
 indicate  significant  potential for achiev-
 ing  competitive capacities. A recom-
 mended plan  for  surface area and
 structural enhancement is presented on
 the basis that lignin can be developed
 as an effective and low-cost adsorbent
 for polar  priority pollutants and/or as an
 ion-exchange resin for heavy metal
 wastewater cleanup.

 Major Findings

Isolation of Pristine Lignin from
Steam-Exploded Wood
  The steam-exploded wood  which was
studied extensively  in this project was
prepared by the hydrothermal decom-
pression  of the hardwood chips of Tulip
poplar (L. tulipfera)  at 350 psig and for
a residence time of  four  minutes. Initial
separation  processing  of this steam-
exploded wood centered on extracting
the lignin component in  "pristine form"
by  using 95% ethanol and  Soxhlet
extraction, followed  by precipitation into
mildly acidified water  (pH = 4)  and
filtration. The average yield of ethanolic
lignin  isolate was 7.5%.  The same
feedstock was treated with 0.1N NaOH
in a single-stage batch extraction (extrac-
tion efficiency found to be >99.4%) and
lignin was isolated by precipitation and
filtration. The average yield (n = 19) was
31.9% (Range:  26.2 - 39.4%). The
recovery  represents  a 4.25-fold increase
in extractable pristine lignin from that of
ethanol.
  Alkaline extractions were  also con-
ducted on steam-exploded aspen hard-
wood,  supplied  by  Stake Technology
(Canada)  Ltd., with the caveat that it was
not representative  of their materials

-------
(although reportedly  processed under
conditions  similar to that of  the  GIT-
processed  Tulip  poplar)  The  average
yield (n = 33) was 25.8%.
  Despite variations in workup, both the
ethanolic  lignm  and alkaline lignin
isolates produced dry particulates of low
surface area. The ethanolic lignin, a light,
free-flowing powder contrasted with the
dark, friable nature of the alkaline isolate,
a  state  which  probably  reflects the
discrepancy in typical BET surface area
values, i.e., 30 m2/g for ethanolic isolate
and 0.1 mVg  for alkaline  isolate.  A
significant difference in the molecular
weight analyses for all three isolates was
found  (Table 3).
Table 3.   Molecular    Weight    and
           Polydispersity of Lignin Isolates
                 Mw
                         Mn   Mw/Mn
 Ethanolic Lignin
 (Tulip poplar)      1,379    939     147

 Alkaline Lignin
 (Tulip poplar)      2,333    859     2 72
Alkaline Lignin
(Aspen)
                88,311   2,081    42.4
   The  alkaline-isolated pristine  lignin
 from Tulip poplar was chosen for detailed
 adsorption  studies because of its high
 yield  (necessary, ultimately,  for cost-
 effectiveness), the promise of adsorptive
 power (functionality) as suggested by its
 moderately  branched  macromolecular
 structure, and the view that the problem
 of increasing surface  area  could  be
 resolved m  later studies. (The  GPC
 results  suggest  that the  hydrothermal
 steam treatment process  will  require
 controlled  analysis for  purposes of
 preparing a  commercial-grade  pristine
 lignin adsorbent.) In  the absence of any
 reported extensive studies of solubility
 behavior of lignin, a rather comprehen-
 sive survey  was accomplished  in  this
 study to prepare a  data  base for the
 establishment  of potential  alternate
 extraction  procedures. The findings of
 this study are summarized in Figure 2.

 Chemical and Physical
 Characterization of Pristine
 Lignin
   The extensive characterization pro-
 gram included the following techniques:
                                            21

                                            20

                                            19

                                            18

                                            17

                                            16


                                            15

                                            14

                                            13


                                            12

                                            11

                                            10
•S

I
c
                                                                 10
                                                                       11
                                                                            12
                                                                                  13
                                                                                        14
                                                                                              15   16
                                                                17    18
                                                                      Solubility Parameter
                                         Figure 2.    Lignin solubility behavior.
                                              Moisture, Ash and Klason Lignin

                                              Elemental Analysis

                                              IR, UV, and NMR Spectroscopy
 3.

 4.
                                              Thermal Analysis (TGA, DSC, Heat
                                              of Combustion)
5.   Electrochemical Functional Group
    Analysis

6.   Gel Permeation Chromatography

7.   Electron Microscopy

8.   BET Surface Area Analysis

-------
  The  results of  the  characterization
indicate that the alkaline lignin isolate
from Tulip poplar, on which adsorption
studies were focused, were not unrepre-
sentative  of  the structural  features
reported in the  literature. The  major
exception was that the molecular weight
and  molecular weight distribution are
relatively low  and narrow, respectively.
C'3 NMR spectra in the literature which
were performed with softwood  lignin
showed differences in  the  aromatic
carbon  region,  as expected  A  heavy
functional group (phenolic hydroxyl) and
aromatic substitution pattern  (methoxy
and  propyl moieties)  were found, as
expected.  Qumonoid   and  carbonyl
groups are present.
  Thermal analysis showed lignin to be
relatively  thermostable  in terms of
primary bond  integrity, that observation
being  subject to the qualification that
crosslinking (and corresponding loss of
functionality,  i.e., adsorptive  capacity)
may be masked m  thermograms. The
higher  heating  value of lignin isolates
(10,350-10,827  BTU/lb,  "as  is") indi-
cates that  lignin would provide a useful
combustible matrix for hazardous waste
isolation and disposal by  incineration

Adsorption Behavior of Pristine
Lignin with Selected Model
Compounds

  Kinetic studies on the  model  com-
pounds established the equilibrium time
required for measurement of adsorption
capacity.
  Equilibrium concentrations for the
model compounds leveled off within two
days, undetectable limits being reached
after only one day in the cases of bis(2-
ethylhexylphthalate) and  pentachloro-
phenol The time required for  achieving
equilibrium was less than 12  hours for
chromium, while lead required 48 hours.
For further adsorption studies, an allow-
ance of four days was made to achieve
equilibrium,  particularly since  large
particle sizes  (30 x 40 mesh)  had been
used for the kinetic studies. A preliminary
cumulative adsorptive capacity (total of
seven organic compounds) of 5 g/kg was
estimated for the ethanolic lignin isolate
used m this study. It was also noted that
an  increase  in adsorption of  model
compounds, both organic and inorganic,
was achieved with a  higher load of lignin,
suggesting the possibility of rapid satu-
ration of adsorption  sites on the surface
of the adsorbent and little penetration
(porosity) of the  adsorbent
  Adsorption  Size  studies  were  con-
ducted on  three  different particle size
fractions (30 x 40, 40 x 60, and  60 x
100 mesh) of ethanolic lignin and one
of alkaline lignin (60 x 100).
  Table 4 shows values for a "cumulative
adsorption  capacity" of the  lignins, at
each size range, for the organic  com-
pounds in the multicomponent solution
(based on the final, equilibrium concen-
tration).  The values show that particle
size does  influence capacity but  to a
lesser extent than would be predicted by
correlation of surface  area  to reduced
particle  diameter. This effect  strongly
suggested that the mechanism of adsorp-
tion is  confined  to  surface  adsorption
sites which  are probably  saturated
relatively quickly and, additionally,  allow
only partial bonding, i.e., only a fraction
of adsorption sites are available, perhaps
due to  steric hindrance  arising from a
rapid buildup (deposition)  of adsorbed
layers.
  It was also noted that the ethanolic
lignin had a "cumulative  adsorption
capacity" which was 36% greater than
that of the comparable alkaline lignin (60
              x  100 mesh).  However, the  ethanolic
              lignin  isolate  had a measured surface
              area of 30 mVg for the alkaline isolate,
              suggesting that the  alkaline  lignin,  if
              modified to increase its surface  area,
              could potentially exceed the adsorption
              capacity of the ethanolic isolate. The fact
              that significantly higher yields of lignin
              are  obtained  by alkaline extraction
              further encouraged the  preferential
              selection  of alkaline-isolated pristine
              lignin for development as adsorbents.
                 The results  of the adsorption  size
              studies with chromium  and lead indi-
              cated that the alkaline isolate possessed
              a significantly higher adsorption capacity
              for heavy  metals  than  does the lignin
              isolated by  the  ethanolic extraction
              procedure. The results  are shown  in
              Table  5. If one defines  the adsorption
              ability of  a resin  by  the percentage  of
              metal  ions adsorbed based  on initial
              concentration,  significant  values are
              obtained for chromium and lead with the
              alkaline-isolated lignin (60 x 100 mesh),
              viz., 91% and 80%, respectively.
                 The difference  in  behavior towards
              heavy metals may be due to the ionization
 Table 4.    Cumulative Adsorption Capacity of Lignin  Types and Sizes for a 7-Component
           Organic Mixture
Lignin Type
EtOH-Lignin**
Mesh Size
30x40
40x60
60 x 100
Sieve
Opening
(mm)
059-0.42
0.42-0.25
0.25-0 15
Adsorption
Capacity
(g/kg)
3.66
4.43
5.30
NaOH-Lignm*
60 x 100
0.25-0.15
3.90
 ^Cumulative Adsorption Capacity: based on the sum of the final, equilibrium concentrations
  for the seven model organic compounds.
 ""The surface area of the ethanolic isolate (30 x 40 mesh) is 30 sq m/g. A comparable alkaline
  lignin isolate (30 x 40 mesh) is 0.1 sq m/g.
 Table 5.    Adsorption Capacity and Ability of Lignin Isolates for Heavy Metal Ions
Lignin
Alkaline
(60x1 00 mesh)
Ethanolic
(60x1 00 mesh)
Ion
Chromium
Lead
Chromium
Lead
Adsorption
Capacity
@ Equilibrium
Concentration
(9/kg)
3.60
356
2.04
1.88
Adsorption
Ability
(% Ion Adsorbed)'
91
80
52
42
"Percentage of metal ions adsorbed based on original concentration (CJ: C0= 10 ppm.

                                         5

-------
of organic functional groups during the
alkaline  hydroxide  extraction and
exchange of sodium ions for protons with
the carboxylate, phenolate, etc., anion
pairs.  Adsorption on alkaline  lignin
isolates may  be expected to be  higher
with heavy metals ions due to an ion-
exchange process which  is not a major
factor in ethanolic isolates.
  Adsorption  Isotherms  representative
of four  groups of hazardous  waste
compounds on alkali-isolated pristine
lignin were determined. The compounds
were representative of acid- and neutral-
extractables  (phenol,  naphthalene),
pesticides (2,4-dichlorophenoxy  acetic
acid), purgeables (trichloroethylene), and
heavy  metals (chromium).  The  experi-
mental data for phenol, naphthalene, and
chromium on pristine lignin were com-
pared to the experimental data reported
by EPA or determined in this study  for
the compounds on activated carbon. The
comparisons  were  based on Freundlich
parameters selected from the adsorption
isotherms of the given model compound
at one  arbitrary, but common,  equili-
brium value.
  Under comparable conditions, the
relative adsorptive  capacity of activated
carbon  for phenol  was  46 g/kg. For
pristine  lignin, the relative adsorptive
capacity  was 1.6 g/kg. To achieve the
same equilibrium concentration, a load-
ing of adsorbent of 100 mg/l of activated
carbon vs. 3000 rng/l of pristine lignin
would be required Therefore, the "effi-
ciency" of pristine lignin is 1/30th that
of  activated  carbon  or 50% below  the
minimal 1/15 target value originally
established  as a  criterion of cost-
effectiveness.  However, the activated
carbon adsorbents have surface areas of
1000 mVg whereas the alkaline-isolated
pristine  lignin  had  a value of only  0.1
mVg.
   A similar  comparative analysis was
made for naphthalene. The relative
adsorption capacities were 184 g/kg and
1.6 g/kg, for  activated  carbon and
pristine, respectively. The corresponding
adsorbent loads were 25  mg/l and 3000
mg/l.
   For the case of heavy metals, pristine
lignin appears to have significantly more
potential  as an  adsorbent vis-a-vis
activated carbon. For essentially similar
experimental conditions,  the  relative
adsorption capacity  for chromium  on
pristine  lignin is 8.7 g/kg vs. 27.8 g/kg
with  activated  carbon.  The  adsorbent
doses  required to  achieve a  similar
 residual concentration were 1.0  g/l  and
0.25  g/l  for  lignin  and  carbon,
respectively.
  The preferred affinity of pristine lignin
for phenol and chromium (and, to a lesser
extent, naphthalene) among the  model
hazardous waste compounds is  indica-
tive of a highly polar adsorption process
at the surface of the lignin. Heavy metal
adsorption is probably due in large part
to a cation exchange mechanism. Little,
if any, contribution is made to adsorption
processes by a porous  microstructure
which  is characteristic  of  commercial
adsorbents. Indeed, the  introduction  of
porosity, and concommitant increase  of
surface  area, is required  for pristine
lignin to be used as an adsorbent.

Conclusions
  1.  If the surface area of pristine lignin
     isolates could be substantially
     increased, they are  potentially
     competitive with activated  carbon
     on a cost-effectiveness basis for
     adsorption of  polar  compounds
     among priority pollutants.
  2.  The adsorption capacity of alkaline-
     isolated lignin for  heavy  metals
     (chromium and  lead) is approxi-
     mately equivalent  to that of  acti-
     vated carbon  (9 g/kg vs.  28 g/kg)
     despite a huge divergence  in sur-
     face area (0.1  mVg vs. 1000 m2/
     g).  The applicability  of pristine
     lignin for polishing of heavy metal
     wastewater is suggested with little
     further   modification    being
     required.
  3.  The  adsorption capacities  (for
     model organic compounds) of spe-
     cific lignin isolates,  which were
     examined in this study, were less
     than those of  activated carbon and
     they failed to achieve the 1  /15th-
     to-1/20th value of carbon adsorp-
     tion capacity (although phenol
     results  approached the criterion)
     which  has been  targeted as  a
     technical  and economic  break-
     even criterion for comparability  of
     lignin and activated carbon.  The
     adsorption capacities  for  phenol
     under comparable conditions  with
     activated carbon and  pristine lig-
     nin, were 46 g/kg and 1.6 g/kg,
     respectively. Corresponding adsor-
     bent loads were  100 mg/l  and
     3000 mg/l,  respectively. Naphth-
     alene was adsorbed by lignin, but
     the disparity  was greater. Only
     marginal  adsorption  of trichlo-
     roethylene was evident and there
    was a  general insensitivity
    increased adsorbent load for t
    purgeable compound.

4.  The major impediment to achiev
    comparability on technoeconor
    grounds  by  lignin  with activa'
    carbon is attributed to  the inor
    nately low values of surface ai
    (order of  0.1  mVg  for alkalir
    isolated lignin). In general, ads
    bents used in commercial adso
    tion processes exhibit high surfe
    area per unit of weight  (100-10
    mVg).

5.  Another significant impediment
    the realization of higher adsorpti
    potential of  lignin appeared to
    the state of extensive substituti
    of the aromatic nuclei in the mac
    molecular structure and  a  hi
    methoxyl group content (vis-a-
    phenoxy hydroxyl content). Sin
    experiments were conducted w
    a single source of steam-explod
    wood processed under  a fixed ;
    of conditions (350 psig, 4 minute
    the nature  of  the  lignin  in  t
    starting  material was itself fix<
    i.e.,  there was no  flexibility
    varying or modifying the compo
    tion  of the lignin isolates whi
    were studied, other than in  t
    fraction  of the  lignin compone
    which  was  extractable  (8% I
    ethanolic lignin and 32% for alk
    line lignin). If conditions could
    optimized during steam-explosh
    (autohydrolysis), methoxyl grou
    could be "uncapped,"  mcreasii
    phenolic  hydroxyl  content  and/
    establishing  a higher  quinor
    character, with the possibility
    greater  electron  delocalizatio
    hydrogen bonding, and  oth
    secondary bonding forces becor
    ing operative during adsorption
    polar compounds.

6.  The surface  activity of  lignin  is
    lates, though seriously limited
    the available active sites on a ve
    limited surface area, did show
    preferred  affinity for phenol  ai
    chromium (and to a lesser degre
    for naphthalene) which is indie
    live of a  highly polar  adsorptu
    mechanism  at  the  surface.  Tl
    magnitude of such effects shou
    be  enhanced by the induction
    micro- and macro-porosity in tt
    lignin isolates.

-------
  7.  The adsorption  kinetics  study
     revealed relatively rapid equili-
     brium of heavy metals by alkaline
     lignm suggesting primary bonding
     forces at work, probably via a cation
     exchange mechanism  involving
     residual sodium ions and the car-
     boxylate or phenolate anions of the
     lignm  macromolecule.  In  these
     studies, alkaline lignin (60  x 100
     mesh) removed 91 % of the original
     chromium concentration and 80%
     of the  lead  ion  concentration.
     Despite  a  higher surface  area,
     ethanolic lignin isolates did not
     perform as well: 52% and 42% for
     chromium  and  lead  removal,
     respectively.
  8.  The  adsorption isotherm curves,
     developed for the Freundlich iso-
     therm equation, were of the S-1
     type (Giles classification).  The
     behavior is explained by the force
     of interaction  between  adsorbed
     molecules being significant rela-
     tive  to  that between solute  and
     adsorbent. Solute molecules tend
     to be packed in rows or clusters on
     the surface and the condition  is
     encouraged with water as solvent,
     which itself is strongly adsorbed on
     a polar absorbent (lignin) and when
     the solute is  mono-functional (as
     with phenol).
  9.  The  experimental evidence in toto
     suggests that it would be prema-
     ture to conclude that pristine lignin
     cannot be developed further to be
     a low-cost, efficient adsorbent for
     polar organic priority pollutants or
     a  cost-competitive  and effective
     ion-exchange resin for heavy metal
     hazardous waste treatment. As an
     adsorbent, its thermal characteris-
     tics (higher heating value of over
     11,000 BTU/lb strongly suggest its
     disposability  thermally. Alterna-
     tively, biochemical  (fungal) degra-
     dation  may be  used. In  both dis-
     posal cases, the hazardous wastes
     would be concentrated.

Recommendations
  Despite the limitations  of  time and
resources that  are associated with
feasibility studies such as this one, there
appears to be ample evidence that lignm,
which is isolatable from steam-exploded
wood, when the  latter material is itself
processed to optimize the extractability
quantitatively  and  qualitatively  of the
modified lignin, possesses the potential
of being either a low-cost, high-efficiency
adsorbent for polar compounds which is
competitive with activated carbon or a
precursor  for  a highly efficient ion-
exchange  resin for  cleanup  of  heavy
metal ions.
   A Phase II study is recommended with
the  objective of  producing a steam-
exploded  or  autohydrolyzed hardwood
under  operational conditions, whereby
lignin can be chemically debonded from
the carbohydrate (cellulose and hemicel-
lulose) components of wood so that it is
readily extracted in high yields and in a
chemical form  in which  deleterious
condensation (lignm-hgnin  or  lignin-
carbohydrate  secondary  reactions)  is
minimized and  in  which  phenolic
hydroxyl and qumonic content is  max-
imized. In addition, the lignm should be
isolated,  preferentially,  by  chemical
process operations that provide a surface
area of 100-1 000 mVg. The surface area
enhancement may be  achieved by one
or more of the following techniques1
(a) mild crosslinking  associated  with
    "blowing agents"

(b) controlled sol-gel techniques

(c) spray drying

(d) uniform coating  of  low-cost  inert
    supports (with or without subsequent
    removal of supports)

(e) optimized     solvent-nonsolvent
   precipitation systems

   In a parallel study, the pristine  lignin
isolate would  be directly compared  to
commercial  weak-acid  and cation
exchange resins. Also, with modification,
because of the highly aromaticized
structure, derivatives of  pristine  lignin
representative of the  major classes  of
ion-exchange resins  will  be prepared,
since the  low cost of the  lignin isolate
(e.g., 5-6C/lb for phenol)  allows deriv-
atives to be highly cost-competitive with
the expensive commercial synthetic ion-
exchange resins  (e.g., $3/kg).
  In summary, the following study ele-
ments are proposed:

  1.  Investigate/identify preferred con-
     ditions  for steam explosion  or
     autohydrolysis to  produce  pre-
     ferred  chemical  structure in the
     lignin isolate.

  2.  Qualitatively characterize  lignin
     isolates  to enhance  the  basic
     chemical structure (a) for preferen-
    tial  adsorption of polar hazardous
    waste compounds, and (b) for facile
    modification  of  the  structure to
    produce ion-exchange resins

3   Maximize yields of extractable
    lignin   from  steam-processed
    hardwoods.

4.  Develop a (preferably  one-stage)
    process for producing high surface-
    area (100-1000  mVg) lignin  iso-
    lates with minimal mitigation of
    surface activity.

5.  Perform kinetics and  adsorption
    isotherm studies with selected
    model  polar  compounds  drawn
    from the EPA list of priority pollu-
    tants  using  both modified lignin
    isolates and activated carbon.

6.  Prepare chemically modified lignin
    derivatives for use and evaluation
    as  ion-exchange resins for  the
    cleanup of heavy metal pollutants
    (and ions, possibly). Minor  modifi-
    cations  include possibilities of (a)
    oxidation to  increase acidic, phe-
    nolic, quinonic,  ketonic, or alde-
    hydic content, and (b)  increasing
    crosslink density/gelation through
    thermal-or thermochemical treat-
    ments. Major modification involves
    chemical substitution, for example,
    of the aromatic nuclei or prepara-
    tion  of  strong-base,   anion-
    exchange resins by chloromethyla-
    tion followed by  reaction  with a
    trialkyl amine.

7.   Characterize the  modified  lignm
    ion-exchange  resins as to their
    porosity, surface area, ion capacity,
    volume stability, swelling, etc.

8.   Prepare a final report on the benef-
    its,  technical  and economic, of
    employing lignin as an adsorbent
    or as an ion-exchange resin  for
    hazardous waste treatment.

-------
     Daniel J.  O'Neil,. Christopher J. Newman, E. S. K. Chian, and H. Gao are with
       Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
     T. David Ferguson is the EPA Project Officer (see below}.
     The complete report entitled "An Evaluation of Pristine Lignin for Hazardous
       Waste  Treatment," (Order No. PB 87-191  664/AS; Cost: $24.95. subject
       to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield. V'A 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300
EPA/600/S2-87/037
                   0000329   PS
                   U  S EWVIR  PROTECTION  AGENCY
                   REGION  5 LIBRARY
                   2§0 S OfARBOR* STREET
                   CHICAGO              IL   60604

-------