United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-87/044  August 1987
&EPA         Project  Summary
                   Retrospective Evaluation of the
                   Effects of Selected Industrial
                   Wastes on  Municipal Solid
                   Waste  Stabilization in
                   Simulated  Landfills

                   Frederick G. Pohland and Stephen R. Harper
                    This   project   presents  a
                  retrospective evaluation of a 10-year
                  study on the codisposal of municipal
                  solid waste (MSW)  with selected
                  wastes in 19 simulated  landfill cells.
                  The objective of the study  was  to
                  determine the effects of additions of
                  water, sewage  sludge, buffer and
                  industrial wastes on the progress of
                  MSW stabilization by evaluation  of
                  leachate and gas characteristics with
                  time. Differences between the results
                  from most of  the landfill cells were
                  influenced by repeated operational
                  exposure to  air during leachate
                  removal and  moisture  addition.
                  However, those cells  which were
                  operated in  a  fashion most
                  conducive    to     anaerobic
                  methanogenesis eventually produced
                  the highest quantities of gas and the
                  least contaminated  leachate. The
                  overall results provide  a basis for
                  recommendations on future studies
                  as well  as design and operational
                  strategies  to maximize  waste
                  stabilization at landfill disposal sites.
                     This  Project  Summary  was
                  developed by EPA's Hazardous Waste
                  Engineering Research Laboratory,
                  Cincinnati,  OH,  to announce  key
                  findings of the research project  that
                  is fully documented in a  separate
                  report of the same title (see Project
                  Report ordering information at back).
 Introduction

   In November  1974,  a  study of  19
 pilot-scale simulated landfill cells was
 initiated to evaluate the effect of selected
 operational variables upon  the rate and
 ultimate degree of biologically mediated
 municipal  solid  waste  (MSW)
 stabilization. Over  a 10-year  period,
 physical and chemical analyses  on
 leachate and gas produced from each
 cell were obtained. The  objective of the
 retrospective evaluation summarized here
 was  to ascertain the  effects of  the
 addition of water, sewage, sludge, buffer,
 and  industrial wastes to the MSW
 contained in each landfill cell

 Preliminary Considerations
   Most landfills receiving MSW  proceed
 through a series of rather predictable
 stabilization phases whose  significance
 and longevity are largely determined by
 climatological conditions,  operational
 variables, management  options and
 control factors operative  or being applied
 either internal or external to the landfill
 environment. These phases  can  be
 identified by certain leachate and  gas
 analyses, selecting those parameters that
 best  describe principal  events
 contributing to the  progress  of
 stabilization during  each  phase.
 Moreover, to direct  the choice  of
 analyses  to be used  to  describe a
 particular phase of stabilization, it is
 necessary to  recognize that anaerobic

-------
conditions exist throughout much of the
active  life of a landfill. This active life
normally extends over a period of years,
during  which time certain  performance
related  and time dependent  concepts
become evident.
   As with many  anaerobic biological
systems, landfills experience an initial lag
or adjustment phase which  lasts until
sufficient  moisture has accumulated to
encourage the development of  a viable
microbial  community. Thereafter,  further
manifestations of  waste conversion and
stabilization  may  be  reflected  by
changes in leachate  and gas quality as
stabilization  proceeds through  several
more or  less  discrete and  sequential
phases, each  varying  in  intensity  and
longevity according  to  prevailing
operational circumstances. Accordingly,
five stabilization  phases  may  be
identified in terms of the principal events
occurring during each phase:

   Phase       Principal Events
I.  Initial        Site closue, subsidence,
   Adjustment  incipient aerobic
               conditions
II. Transition    Initial leachate
               formation,
               change from aerobic to
               anaerobic conditions
III. Acid        Active  hydrolysis, acid
   Formation    fermentation, pH
               decrease
IV. Methane     Production of CH4 and
   Fermentation CC>2, pH increase,
               nutrient consumption,
               metal complexation
V. Final        Relative dormancy,
   Maturation   secondary fermentation,
               production of humic
               substances


   Phases III  and  IV are  particularly
significant; the latter  Phase IV occurring
when rapid biological stabilization (RBS)
transforms intermediate products of
hydrolysis and acid formation (Phase III)
to CH4 and  C02.  The  facility   of the
associated indicator parameters to detect
and describe the presence, intensity, and
longevity of these phases is illustrated in
Figure  1.
   All of the principal events selected to
describe and separate  these stabilization
phases are encountered at one  time or
another  in landfills containing  MSW,
provided that the associated  microbially
mediated  processes  have  been
augmented by a sufficiency of moisture
and nutrients and are not exposed to the
inhibitory  influences  of toxic materials.
However,  the  manifestations of these
phases often overlap  within the usual
landfill  setting, since no  landfill  has a
single  "age",  but rather a family  of
different  ages  associated  with  the
development of various sections or cells
within  the landfill  complex and  the
progress  of each toward stabilization.
Moreover, the  rate of progress  through
these phases may vary depending on the
physical,  chemical, and microbiological
conditions developed within each section
with time, and leachate and gas analyses
often reflect the merging of conditions in
each discrete section.
   These concepts provided the basis for
a separate interpretation of  results from
each of the 19 individual cells as well  as
a more specific comparison of groups of
cells (e.g., indoor, outdoor  water-only,
and  codisposal cells) in terms  of the
effects  of operational variables on solid
waste  stabilization  rates  and  the
composition of leachates produced.  In
the latter  analysis,  comparisons are
provided  for peak, pre-RBS, and  final
concentrations  of each  monitoring
parameter.

Experimental  Procedures
   The 19  simulated landfill cells were
constructed of 1.83-m  diameter steel
tubes,  3.6 m  in height,  and with  an
overall  volume of 9.5 m3. The sidewalls
of the  cells were coated  with a coal-tar
epoxy,  and the bottoms were made water
tight by fitting  the cells with a Fiberglas
liner. Each cell was placed on a concrete
slab, filled to  a  height of 0.15 m  with
silica.gravel,  filled  further  with
approximately  2.4 m  (eight 0 3-m  lifts)
of MSW  plus  codisposal additives, and
then by cover  layers of 0.3-m silty  clay
and 0 3-m pea gravel. Gas  probes were
installed at three  depths; two gas  probes
were placed above the second and sixth
MSW lifts, and another in the upper pea
gravel  layer. Temperature probes were
placed  above  tho  swoncl,  tumlh,  and
sixth MSW lifts.
   A water  distribution ring placed in the
upper pea  gravel layer provided  for the
application of infiltration  water,  and
individual  pipes  at the bottom of each
cell and  connected  to a  central  well
provided  for the collection  of  leachate
Four of the cells were  housed indoors
where  maintenance of water  and  gas
tight  seals  was  facilitated,  and
temperatures  were more conducive  to
enhanced anaerobic  biological
stabilization. AJI  of the  remaining cells
were outdoors and underground.
   The MSW was loaded to the cells in
eight  lifts. Codisposal  additives were
 evenly distributed and placed atop each
 of  the  last  seven  lifts.  Each  lift  was
 compacted after  loading with a wrecking
 ball;  densities  of in-place MSW  varied
 from  470 to 800 kg/m3  with variations
 arising primarily  from  differences  in the
 wet weight  of  the codisposal additive.
 The  weight  of  MSW  and  codisposal
 additives placed in each cell are listed  in
 Table 1  along  with  their  respective
 moisture contents.
   Two MSW  samples were obtained
 from  each of the eight lifts in each cell
 and characterized with  respect to the
 percentage (wet weight) for the 10 waste
 categories indicated  in Table 2. Samples
 from  each separated category were then
 analyzed for  a  number  of chemical
 parameters.
   The  six   industrial  waste additives
 selected  for  codisposal  included
 petroleum refinery  oil/water separator
 sludge,  neutralized  lead/acid  battery
 waste sludge,  electroplating (Cr, Ni, Cd,
 Cu, Fe,  Zn) sludge, inorganic (titanium
 dioxide) pigment waste,  mercury  cell
 chlorine  brine  sludge,  and solvent-
 based paint sludge
   Leachate and gas  samples  were
 collected  monthly just prior  to moisture
 additions  and  analyzed for quantity  and
 quality. Leachate samples were analyzed
 for COD, TOC,  TKN,  total phosphorus,
 total  volatile  acids, total solids, total
 alkalinity, pH, specific conductivity, and a
 number  of  metals including cadmium,
 chromium, copper,  iron,  lead, mercury,
 nickel,  and  zinc.  Gas  samples  were
 removed  from  the cells by means  of a
 vacuum  pump and  drawn into sampling
 burets from  which  a representative
 portion was  obtained with a syringe for
 injection into a GC. Gas volumes were
 measured by collecting the gas in  plastic
 bags and pumping  the gases through a
 wet-test meter with a  vacuum  pump.
 Gas  samples were analyzed for percent
 CH4, CO2, N2 and O2

 Results and Discussion
    Interpretations  of individual simulated
 landfill  cell   behavior were  based upon
 organic  indicators,  pH, specific
 conductivity,  and  metals data.   Of
 additional importance  were  temperature
 and  moisture  related  parameters
 including  infiltration volumes  applied,
 leachate  volumes  collected, and the
 moisture retained by the waste mass.
    The analyses  of cell behavior  also
' include  pertinent information  reported
 during cell  unloading  and final disposal
 operations. This analysis revealed  that for
 most of the cells, much of the solid waste
 was loaded while still in intact plastic and

-------
    1.0
    0.8
    0.6
 I
  w
 5

 1 0.4
    0.2
     0.0
                                                200               400

                                                     Stabilization Time. Days

Figure  1.    Changes in selected indicator parameters during the phases of landfill stabilization.
                                                                         X
                                                                         O)
                                                                     Q
                                                                     O
                                                                     (o
                                                                                                          0.
                                           600
paper  bags. Therefore, much  of  the
waste,  including  the garbage  and
vegetative  matter,  was protected and
remained relatively  unaltered  even  after
10  years  residence in the test cells.
Although the contents of the landfill cells
appeared  as  a black, tar-like  mass,
many  recognizable articles  remained
intact.
   Some of the  research  objectives
originally  conceived  for the  research
proved unattainable, primarily because of
operational differences between  sealed
and  vented cells which obscured  the
effects of the  codisposal  variables
intended for study. In particular,  the
failure  of gas  seals and the  intentional
placement of gas vents atop some of the
outdoor cells  led  to the  regular
introduction of air into most cells during
leachate drainage  and water addition
operations. This prevented  or delayed
the establishment and maintenance  of
anaerobic  conditions  necessary  for
methanogenesis  and  rapid biological
stabilization (RBS) and,  thereby, retarded
the stabilization of the waste mass and
the associated reduction in leachate
strength  over time. Accordingly, the
majority  of  change   in  leachate
characteristics for  many of the cells was
caused by solubitization and  washout of
high   concentrations of   waste
constituents. This  transfer of  waste
constituents without  biologically
mediated  stabilization  is undesirable
because it  would result  in  greater
leachate  treatment requirements  and
potential  for leachate  migration  and
environmental impairment.
   The indoor cells, which  were kept
more  anaerobic  and  at  warmer
temperatures, stabilized fastest and,
therefore, eventually produced the least
quantities   of  leachate-transported
contaminants Conversely, the  outdoor
air-exposed cells  took  longer  to
approach  or  reach rapid  biological
stabilization  (RBS) or methanogenesis
and,  therefore,  produced   higher
quantities and more dramatic  washout of
leachate contaminants
Conclusions

   The importance of rapidly establishing
and maintaining  stable anaerobic
biological conditions (i.e., RBS) was
clearly illustrated  by the  results  of this
study. The cells which were operated in a
fashion   most   conducive   to
methanogenesis produced  the  highest
amounts  of methane, while also  yielding
the most stabilized  and lowest strength
leachates The effects of  the codisposal
variables  were directly manifested in the
characteristics of the leachates produced
in the absence of biological activity.
   Simulated  landfill cell design and
operation were  the major  variables
influencing  the  relative contributions  of
biological and physical waste stabilization
mechanisms  and  the understanding  of
how they are affected by codisposed
industrial wastes   Since  anaerobic
biological activity was inhibited in many
of the test cells, it was not possible from
this  study  to clearly  distinguish  the
effects of the  codisposed wastes   on

-------
Table 1.
Test
Cell
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9"
10"
11
12
13
14
15"
16
17
18*
19*
General Loading Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste and Codisposal Additives Placed in the Test Cells
Codisposal Additive MSW
Type of Cell Codisposal Additive
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS



OS















OV
0V
OV

OV
OV
OV
OV
IS
IS
IS
IS
Water, 200 mm/yr
Water, 400 mm/yr
Water, 600 mm/yr
Water, 800 mm/yr
Sewage Sludge
Sewage Sludge
Sewage Sludge
Calcium Carbonate
Petroleum Sludge
Battery Waste Sludge
Prewetting Water
Electroplating Sludge
Inorganic Pigment Waste
Chlorine Brine Sludge
Polio Virus
Water, 400 mm/yr
Solvent-Based Paint Sludge
Water, 400 mmlyr
Water, 400 mmlyr
Wet
Weight, kg
-


-
68
204
680
91
1518
1291
1293
1190
1421
2039
-
-
1604
-
-
Moisture
Content, %
-
-
-
-
888
880
880
JO.O
790
893
1000
79.5
51.7
24 1


24.7
-
-
Dry
Weight, kg
-
-

-
8
24
82
82
319
138
0
244
686
492
-
-
1208
-
-
Wet
Weight, kg
3025
2989
3007
3002
3001
2919
2964
2994
3001
2998
2924
3048
3006
3015
3010
2996
2998
3000
3012
Moisture
Content, %
382
382
382
382
382
38.2
382
382
30.4
304
38.2
382
38.2
38.2
304
38.2
38.2
30.4
304
Dry
Weight, kg
1870
1847
1858
1855
1855
1804
1832
1850
2089
2087
1807
1883
1858
1863
2041
1852
1853
2088
2096
OS = outdoor, initially sealed.
OV - outdoor with vented or poorly fitted top.
IS = well sealed indoor.
' Cells were loaded April 1975, all others in November 1974.
biological degradation patterns Nor was
it possible to provide a clear indication of
the leachate characteristics expected
from  the  codisposal  cells  under
conditions  more  favorable   to
methanogenesis, where leachate organic
strength  is  drastically  reduced  by
conversion  to  methane and  carbon
dioxide,  and   metals  are  more
successfully  attenuated  by  increased
levels of sulfides and other precipitation
mechanisms  prevalent at more  neutral
pH values. Therefore,  determination  of
acceptable codisposal loadings in terms
of attenuation and absence of inhibition
could not be made.
   Since the  potential influences of the
industrial  wastes on biological activity
were  obscured  by operational practices
detrimental to methanogenesis,  most of
the apparent waste mass  "conversion" in
the outdoor industrial waste cells was  by
washout. On  the other hand,  the results
from  the  indoor  cells   serve  to
demonstrate  the  benefits of enhanced
biological activity  toward  reducing
potential  environmental  impact
associated with  leachate migration and
ultimate leachate treatment and disposal
costs, and improving  the  recovery  of
energy as biogas. The simulated landfill
cells  which  attained  rapid  biological
stabilization  (RBS)  most  quickly
produced less than half the quantities of
leachate organic contaminants  than  did
cells which did not reach RBS

Recommendations
   To minimize the quantities of organic
and  inorganic contaminants transported
from  the  waste  mass  via  leachate,
emphasis should be placed on promoting
anaerobic biological activity in MSW and
codisposal  landfills.  This  would involve
efforts to provide anaerobic  conditions,
temperature insulation,  a sufficient and
uniform moisture  environment, and  the
minimization of isolation  or  restricting
layers  which  protect  wastes  from
microbial and moisture contact
   To  promote anaerobic  conditions,
landfills should  be designed  to  be  as
contained  and  aa homogeneous  as
possible,   with  the  development  of
individual cells  and the  selection and
maintenance of the containment system
receiving particular attention  In addition,
MSW  placement  should  be  scheduled
such that  this process is enhanced in
each landfill.
   Since the results from this study did
not  conclusively reveal  the expected
influences  of  codisposed  industrial
wastes, sewage  sludge, and buffer,
additional  studies are recommended  to
more  fully elucidate the potential effects
of these variables.  Any  future  studies
should be  undertaken  using  well
controlled landfill  cells  operated in a
fashion  conducive  to  promoting  rapid
biological stabilization (RBS), so that the
effects of industrial  waste loadings on
biologically mediated MSW stabilization
and the associated attenuation capacity
for these loadings can be established.
   In light of  the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act Amendments leading
to the banning of liquids and hazardous
wastes from landfills, and the shortage of
approved hazardous waste land disposal
sites,  the industrial  wastes chosen for
additional  codisposal  studies should be
selected in cognizance of both the total
production  quantities of these  wastes as
well as the quantities which may permit
safe disposal in MSW landfills

-------
Table 2.      Compositional Analyses of Municipal Solid Waste Placed in Each of the Nineteen Test Cells
                                                                    Waste Component, % by wet weight
Test
Cell
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19




Loading Variable
Water, 200 mm/yr
Water, 400 mm/yr
Water, 600 mm/yr
Water, 800 mm/yr
Sewage Sludge
Sewage Sludge
Sewage Sludge
Calcium Carbonate
Petroleum Sludge
Battery Waste Sludge
Prewetting Water
Electroplating Sludge
Inorganic Pigment Waste
Chlorine Brine Sludge
Water, 400 mmlyr
Solvent-Based Paint Sludge
Water, 400 mm/yr
Water, 400 mm/yr
Mean"
Standard Deviation


Paper
37 1
41.5
365
378
41 2
349
43.6
53 1
41 3
44 0
398
465
39 1
37.1
41 8
45 7
483
43.2
41 8
46

Garden
Wastes
138
21 5
25.9
226
166
302
203
11 1
17.0
82
162
95
207
11 1
163
156
98
11.9
166
60


Metals
12.2
8.5
8.1
5.9
80
8.6
90
58
89
88
8.4
77
83
99
89
77
9.3
74
84
1 4


Food
9.5
6.3
6.1
59
11.3
11 0
53
66
76
112
87
82
63
90
7.3
6.0
6.2
8.5
7.9
1.9


Glass
93
99
94
88
7 1
59
64
6.4
5.3
72
9.0
88
78
8.2
6.0
66
84
10.0
7.8
1.5
Plastics,
Rubber,
Leather,
Textiles
11 2
99
6 7
105
14 9
tie
98
12 2
140
10 1
1 1 I
80
10 1
124
13.9
11 3
94
102
1 1 1
18


Fines
40
35
30
35
2.9
24
28
1 7
2 1
33
34
42
29
4 1
28
28
34
36
3 /
07
Ash,
Rock,
Dirt
33
33
35
1 4
1 6
34
29
1.6
2.8
4 7
20
6 1
1 8
4 1
1.3
2.7
30
1.9
29
1 3


Diapers
25
1.2
1.5
32
1 8
23
24
1 6
09
29
24
1 5
3 7
4.8
2.7
1 6
29
3.0
24
1.0


Wood
1.4
2.2
1 4
20
1 1
03
1 7
1.1
1 9
4 4
1 6
1 2
1 4
1.5
08
1.4
39
1.9
1 7
1 0
' The mean is based on 18 rather than 19 cells since the Compositional Analysis for Cell No  15 was not available

-------
  Frederick G. Portland and Stephen R. Harper are with the Georgia Institute of
  Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332..
  Jonathan G. Herrmann is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  ~fhe complete report, entitled "Retrospective Evaluation of the Effects of
  Selected Industrial Wastes on Municipal Solid Waste Stabilization in Simulated
  Landfills," (Order No. PB 87-198 701IAS; Cost: $24.95, subject to change) will
  be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Royal Road
           Springfield, VA22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
           Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States                  Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection        Information
Agency                       Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-87/044
             OC0032V   PS

             U  S  ENVIR PROTECTION  AGENCY
             REGION  5  LIBRARY
             230  S  DEARBORN  STREET  _,
             CHICAGO               IL   60604

-------