United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
 Hazardous Waste Engineering
 Research Laboratory
 Cincinnati OH 45268
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-87/054 Sept. 1987
SERA          Project Summary
                    Distribution  of Trace  Element
                    Emissions from the  Liquid
                    Injection  Incinerator  Combustion
                    Research  Facility
                    Johannes W. Lee, Robert W. Ross, II, Ralph H. Vocque, Jerry W. Lewis, and
                    Larry R. Waterland
                     The  EPA is currently developing
                    regulations on trace element emissions
                    from hazardous waste incineration.
                    However, the data base on trace ele-
                    ment emissions from incinerators which
                    can be used to support regulations is
                    very sparse. Data on the effects of
                    waste  composition  and incinerator
                    operation on trace element emissions
                    are particularly lacking. In response to
                    these data needs, a series of tests were
                    conducted at  EPA's  Combustion Re-
                    search Facility (CRF) to investigate the
                    fate of volatile trace elements in liquid
                    injection hazardous waste incineration.
                    In these tests, arsenic in the form of
                    arsenic trioxide (As2O3) and antimony
                    in the form of  antimony trichloride
                    (SbCI3) were added to a methanol base
                    containing varying amounts of chloro-
                    benzene and carbon tetrachloride, and
                    fired in the liquid injection incinerator
                    at the CRF. Test variables  included
                    incinerator temperature and excess air
                    level, and feed chlorine content. Test
                    results show a relatively even distribu-
                    tion of both elements between scrubber
                    exit flue gas and scrubber blowdown.
                    Both elements are found in the vapor
                    phase at high temperatures,  although
                    most condenses to particulate at
                    scrubber exit temperatures. Designated
                    POHC destruction and removal effici-
                    ency (ORE)  ranged  from 99.99 to
                    99.999 percent at the afterburner exit
                    to 99.999 to 99.9999 percent in the
                    scrubber exit flue gas. Typical levels of
                    common products of incomplete com-
                    bustion were measured.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA'* Hazardous Watte Engineering
Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, to
announce key findings of the research
project that Is fully documented In a
separate report of the same title (see
Project Report ordering Information at
back).

Introduction
  In support of the EPA Office of Solid
Waste (OSW) hazardous waste incinerator
regulation development, a series of in-
cineration tests to determine the fate of
two Appendix VIII  metals, antimony and
arsenic,  were  conducted at the  EPA
Combustion  Research Facility (CRF) in
Jefferson, Arkansas. These metal emis-
sion tests are important, because risk
assessments show that metal emissions
from otherwise properly operated incin-
erators can be the largest component of
risk to human health and the environment.
  These tests incinerated mixtures  of
methanol, chlorobenzene, and  carbon
tetrachloride, spiked with  SbCI3 and
As203. The objectives of the test program
were:
  • To track emissions of arsenic and
   antimony through the  incinerator
   system
  • To study the distribution of metals
   between flue gas and scrubber blow-
   down water
  • To explore the relationship between
   metal emissions and  incinerator
   operating  conditions  and feed
   chlorine  content
  • To evaluate whether the  metals

-------
    affect waste component destruction
  • To extend the data base on volatile
    products of incomplete combustion
    (PIC) emissions from the incineration
    of chlorinated hydrocarbons

Approach
  The tests were conducted in the liquid
injection incineration system (LIS) at the
CRF. The  LIS can incinerate  pumpable
and atomizable liquid wastes.
  Figure 1 shows a simplified schematic
of the incinerator system which consists
of two refractory-lined  combustion
chambers. The system cleans the com-
bustion  product  gases with  a packed-
column  scrubber, and an  ionizing wet
scrubber, followed by an activated carbon
bed adsorber and a high efficiency par-
ticulate  (HEPA) filter. An induced draft
fan downstream of the HEPA filter draws
a slight vacuum (draft) throughout the
incinerator/scrubber system and vents
the combustion products via a stack.
  The research program studied the ef-
fects of three operating parameters: feed
chlorine content, incinerator temperature,
and combustion excess air. A Box-Wilson
factorial experimental  design specified
18 test conditions which included 5 levels
of variation for each parameter.
  Blends of methanol, carbon tetrachlo-
ride,  and chlorobenzene  in  the feed
produced the various inlet chlorine con-
centrations (0 to 33.8 percent). Arsenic
and antimony were added to these blends
in proportions designed to give constant
   feed concentrations of 12 and 40 ppm
   respectively for all tests. These concentra-
   tions in the feed material ensure that the
   worst-case concentrations in the stack
   gas will never exceed the threshold limit
   values (TLV), of 0.2 mg As/m3 and 0.5
   mg Sb/m3. Furthermore, if all the trace
   metals leave the  incinerator via  the
   scrubber blowdown water, their concen-
   trations will  not exceed the  EP toxicity
   limits (5 mg As/L, no limit established for
   Sb).
     The liquid feed entered the main com-
   bustion chamber via a steam-atomized
   nozzle at  about  45 kg/hr (100 Ib/hr).
   Auxiliary propane maintained the incin-
   erator at the specified temperature which
   ranged from 1,137° to 1,450°C (2,079°
   to 2,642°F). Combustion air entered via
   swirl registers in the burner  to produce
   from 5.9 to 11.7 percent excess oxygen
   at the incinerator exit.
     Figure 2 illustrates the sampling  pro-
   tocol. In  addition  to the  continuous
   monitors,  which measured 02, CO, and
   C02, volatile organic sampling  trains
   (VOST) collected samples  at the after-
   burner and the scrubber exits. Thermal
   desorption purge  and trap  GC/FID
   analyzed  for  22 volatile organic com-
   pounds.
     EPA reference Method 5 was used to
   collect samples for particulate load and
   arsenic  and  antimony  analyses.  The
   Method 5  train was modified to ensure
   collection  of any antimony and arsenic
   which passed through  the  particulate
filter. It consisted of a probe and a glass
cyclone,  followed by a filter  and five
impingers. The first impinger contained
0.1 N NaOH. The second, third and fourth
impingers contained 0.2 M (NH4)2S208 +
0.02 M AgN03. The  last impinger con-
tained silica gel. Following collection and
digestion, furnace atomic adsorption (AA)
methods were used to analyze for arsenic
and antimony.

Results
  Of the 18 planned tests,  12 were com-
pleted. The remaining 6 tests were gen-
erally unattainable due to flame stability
problems at low flame temperatures and
low excess air conditions.

Trace Metal Discharges
  Good mass balance  closure for  anti-
mony and arsenic could not be established
during these tests. Table 1 lists the frac-
tions of inlet antimony found at the after-
burner exit, the scrubber exit and the
scrubber blowdown water. As shown in
the table, for the three tests where the
feed contained nominally 26  percent
chlorine, no more than about 1 percent of
the inlet antimony, was measured in the
afterburner exit flue gas. For one test
with the nominally 19 percent chlorine
feed, less than 0.1 percent of the inlet
antimony was detected in the afterburner
exit flue gas. For the remaining tests with
nominally 19 percent chlorine feed and
the tests with nominally 8 percent and 0
percent chlorine feed,  between 25 and
                                                                                                         Carbon Bed
                                                                                                         Filter
                               Building Wall


                       Afterburner Chamber
                       (Unfired)
                         Sampling Port
                       Quench Chamber
            Main Chamber

      Aux  Propane
      Liquid Feed
  Atomizing  Steam


  Combustion Air
Venturi Scrubber  	/
                                                                                      Scrubber Liquid Tank
 Figure 1.    Simplified schematic of the EPA liquid injection incinerator system

                                    2

-------
Primary
Combustor


Secondary \
Combustor J~
H Packed Tower
Scrubber


Ionizing ^
Wet Scrubber I F
1 Carbon
Bed

Sampling
Point
1
2
3
4
5
Parameter
Waste
Feedrate
X




Waste
Feed
X




Auxiliary
Fuel
Feedrate
X




Air
Feedrate
X




CM's
Scrubber I (Oz, CO,
Slowdown CO2, NO,)
<- - \ - j


X



X


X
Volume
Flow

X
X
X
X
M5
(Paniculate, •
Metals)

X

X
X"
VOST
(Volatile
Organics)

X

X

Temperature

X

X
X
Pressure

X

X
X
Relative
Humidity

X

X
X
 "Paniculate only.
Figure 2.    Sampling protocol

101  percent of the  input antimony was
measured  in the afterburner exit flue
gas.
  Between 15 and 84 percent of the inlet
antimony was measured in the scrubber
discharge streams (flue gas plus blow-
down).  Scrubber blowdown  water ac-
counted for 5 to 75 percent of the inlet
antimony.  Scrubber exit  flue gas ac-
counted for between 3 and 21 percent of
the inlet antimony. Comparable fractions
of antimony were generally measured in
these two streams for a given test.
  Mass balance closure in the afterburner

Table 1.    Antimony Discharge Distributions
exit flue gas was quite poor for four tests.
However, for 4 of 5 tests at the nominally
19 percent chlorine feed, two at nominally
8 percent chlorine feed, the one with no,
and the one with about 34 percent chlo-
rine  feed,  mass  balance  closure was
within a factor of 3. This is in the range of
acceptable  mass balance closure based
on past experience. Closure results are
generally better at the scrubber discharge.
Still, closure within a factor of 3 was
obtained for only 7 tests.
  The  inability to attain better mass
balance closure in the tests was likely
                                              Antimony discharge distribution3
                                                   (percent of feedrate)
Test
No.
14
4
5
7
13
18
16
2
3
6
9
15
Feed Cl
content,
percent
33.8
26.4
27.1
26.4
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
7.6
7.9
0.
Primary
combustor
temperature,
°C(°F)
1.293 (2.359)
1,307 (2,384)
1.137(2,079)
1.399(2,551)
1.203 (2, 198)
1,176(2,148)
1.450 (2.642)
1,336 (2,437)
1.228 (2.243)
1,290 (2.354)
1.425(2.597)
1.265(2.310)
Afterburner Afterburner
exit 02, exit
percent flue gas
9.2
10.5
10.8
6.1
11.8
10.7
7.4
9.2
8.4
10.1
5.9
8.1
34 (52)
0.1 S/3
0.3 (0.24)
1. 1 (1.8)
0 (0. 1 1)
32 (53)
83 (146)
79 (104)
89 (99)
56 (47)
101 (83)
25 (38)
Scrubber
discharge streams
Flue gas
8(12)
14"
17(13)
18 (30)
3(6.6)
9(14)
21 (36)
15 (20)
10(11)
20(17)
17(14)
9.4(14)
Blowdown
7(11)
22*
21 (16)
8(12)
40 (87)
75(124)
5(8.3)
9(12)
13 (15)
10(18)
18(15)
7(11)
Total
15(23)
36"
38 (29)
26 (42)
43 (94)
84 (138)
26 (44)
24 (32)
23 (26)
30 (35)
35 (29)
16(25)
 " Numbers in parenthesis are based on a feed composition calculated from feed constituent
  blending proportions
  No feed sample analysis, value based on a feed composition calculated from feed constituent
  blending proportions.
affected by the fact that accumulation of
element concentrations in recirculating
scrubber  liquor  was  not taken  into
account.
  Table 2 shows the distribution of anti-
mony between the particulate and vapor
phases in the flue gas at both the after-
burner exit  and the scrubber exit.  The
table shows that, at the afterburner exit
where temperatures were above 760°C
(1,400°F), the vapor  phase (impinger
samples)  contained an average of  55
percent (range 5  to 90) of the collected
antimony. At the scrubber exit where the
temperature was  generally at 74°C
(165°F), the  vapor phase accounted for
an average of 6 percent (range 0 to 38) of
the collected antimony.

  Tables 3 and 4 list the arsenic mass
balance and phase distribution data. In
the afterburner exit flue gas, detectable
levels  of  arsenic  were  measured for 9
tests. The measured fractions  of feed
arsenic ranged from 1.4 to 245 percent.
Eight tests showed better than 10 percent
arsenic recovery.  Seven of  these  cor-
responded to mass balance closure within
a factor of 3.
  The  combination of the scrubber exit
gas with  the scrubber discharge blow-
down accounted for 3.8 to 299 percent of
the input arsenic. Mass balance closure
around the scrubber was within  a factor
of 3 for eight tests. More often than not, a
greater proportion of arsenic  was found
in the flue  gas  than  in  the scrubber
blowdown.
  At the afterburner exit, arsenic is dis-
tributed between the vapor and particulate

-------
Table 2.    Antimony Flue Gas Distributions
                                              Antimony distribution between
                                             paniculate and vapor phase in the
                                                   flue gas (percent)
T.«o*
lest
No.
14
4
5
7
13
18
16
2
3
6
9
15
Table 3.
Feed Cl
content.
percent
33.8
26.4
27.1
26.4
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
7.6
7.9
0.
Arsenic
Primary
combustor
temperature.
°C(°F)
1,293 (2,359)
1,307 (2.384)
1, 137 (2,079)
1,399 (2,551)
1,203 (2. 198)
1.176(2.148)
1,450(2.642)
1,336 (2,437)
1,228(2.243)
1,290 (2,354)
1. 425 (2,597)
1,265(2.310)
Afterburner Afterburner exit
exit 02,
percent
9.2
10.5
10.8
6.1
11.8
10.7
7.4
9.2
8.4
10.1
5.9
8.1

Paniculate
32
62
49
53
42
21
76
10
22
41
34
95

Vapor
68
38
51
47
58
79
24
90
78
59
66
5
Scrubber discharge

Paniculate
99
99
62
99
99
100
99.9
82
97
100
98
99

Vapor
1
1
38
1
1
0
0.1
18
3
0
2
1
Discharge Distributions
                                             Arsenic discharge distribution11
                                                  (percent of feedrate)
Test
No.
14
4
5
7
13
18
16
2
3
6
9
15
Feed Cl
content,
percent
33.8
26.4
27.1
26.4
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
7.6
7.9
0.
Primary
combustor
temperature,
°C (°F)
1,293 (2.359)
1.307(2.384)
1.137(2,079)
1.399 (2.551)
1.203(2.198)
1.176(2,148)
1.450(2,642)
1.336 (2,437)
1,228 (2,243)
1,290 (2.354)
1.425 (2.597)
1.265 (2.310)
Afterburner Afterburnei
exit O2, exit
percent flue gas
9.2
10.5
10.8
6.1
11.8
10.7
7.4
9.2
8.4
10.1
5.9
8.1
126(26)
NO
NO
1.4(1.7)
ND
25(4.0)
245 (77)
45 (10 2)
77(20)
125(32)
153(177)
103(21)
Scrubber
discharge streams
Flue gas
30 (6. 1)
3.06
15 (5. 1)
49 (58)
ND
13 (2.2)
30 (9.4)
19 (4.3)
289 (73)
60 (15)
26 (20)
5(1.1)
Slowdown
2.5(0.5)
3.8"
6.9 (2.3)
5.4 (6.4)
3.8 (2.8)
19 (3. 1)
6.0(1.9)
2.3 (0.51)
9.8 (2.5)
21 (5.3)
20(15)
32 (6.6)
Total
33 (6 6)
J2"
22(7.4)
54 (64)
3.8 (2.8)
32 (5.3)
36(11)
21 (4.8)
299 (76)
81 (20)
46 (35)
37(7.7)
ND — Not detected.
" Numbers in parenthesis are based on a feed composition calculated from feed constituent
  blending proportions.
b Feed sample not analyzed; value based on feed composition calculated from feed constituent
  blending proportion.
phases. More often than not, a greater
proportion was found in the participate.
At the scrubber discharge, usually all of
the  arsenic was  measured  in the
particulate.

Destruction and Removal
Efficiencies (ORE)
  The tests demonstrated acceptable
DREs for both carbon tetrachloride and
chlorobenzene.  Chlorobenzene  DREs
were higher than those for carbon tetra-
chloride. Carbon tetrachloride DREs were
greater than 99.99 percent at the after-
burner exit. These increased to greater
than 99.999 percent at the scrubber exit.
Similarly,  chlorobenzene DREs ranged
from 99.999 percent at the afterburner
exit to generally better than 99.999 per-
cent at  the scrubber exit. The  available
data do not suggest any discernible effect
of temperature, feed composition, excess
air, or the presence of arsenic or antimony
on  DRE. This is in  general agreement
with previous CRF data which has con-
sistently shown high in DREs for con-
centrated feed materials.

Products of Incomplete
Combustion
  Incineration produces low  levels of
PICs. The CRF routinely analyzes VOST
samples for 22 organic compounds with
GC/FID. For these tests at the afterburner
exit, of these  22 compounds,  carbon
tetrachloride  (POHC) was present at the
highest levels (>100 /ug/dscm).  Other
chlorinated alkanes  and alkenes were
present in the 10 to 100 /ug/dscm range.
Chlorobenzene (POHC) concentrations
were  similar to those of the  common
chlorinated PICs.
  At the scrubber exit, PIC concentrations
are about one-tenth of those  at  the
scrubber  inlet,  i.e.,  afterburner exit.
Carbon tetrachloride (a POHC)  levels
ranged from  4.4 to 31 ug/dscm. The
highest concentrations occurred at  low
excess air conditions. Except for one test,
chlorobenzene (the other POHC),  levels
ranged from 1.4 to 14 /ug/dscm and did
not appear to correlate with temperature
or excess air. Other PICs include methy-
lene chloride which  was present in all
tests at relatively high levels (11  to 139
ug/dscm). Other chlorinated alkanes and
alkenes, hexane, benzene,  and toluene
were present at levels generally  below
10/ig/dscm.
  All the data reported above for methy-
lene chloride,  1,1 -dichloroethylene, 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, tri-
chloroethylene,  benzene,  hexane, and
toluene are somewhat compromised due
to  laboratory solvent  contamination.
However, since the reported results are
quite  consistent with past experience,
they are reported here.

Conclusions
  Major conclusions from the test results
addressing each  of the test objectives
noted in the Introduction are:
  • Antimony was relatively evenly dis-
    tributed between the particulate and
    vapor phases in flue gas samples
    taken at the afterburner exit. The
    same was generally true for arsenic,
    although a greater fraction was found
    in  the  particulate  phase for  the
    greater number of tests. Most, if not
    all of the antimony and arsenic was
    found in  the particulate catch of the
    sampling trains run at the scrubber
    exit.

-------
The  success  in  achieving mass
balance closure in the flue gas at
the afterburner exit, and in  the
scrubber exit flue gas and scrubber
blowdown discharge was in keeping
with past experience. Mass balance
closure was within a factor of 3 for 6
to 8 of the 12  tests performed for
each element/location (afterburner
exit or scrubber discharge) combina-
tion. Four of the 12 tests had very
low (less than 2 percent) both anti-
mony and arsenic recovery in the
afterburner exit flue gas. The lowest
recovery in scrubber discharges (flue
gas plus scrubber blowdown) were
better; 15 percent for antimony and
4 percent for arsenic. However, no
account was taken for accumulation
of the elements in the recirculating
scrubber liquor. This may  have af-
fected  the ability to achieve better
mass balance closure.
Comparable fractions of the input
antimony were accounted for in the
scrubber  exit  flue  gas and  the
scrubber blowdown. The same  was
largely true for arsenic, although a
greater fraction of arsenic was found
in the scrubber exit flue gas  in a
greater number of tests.
No clear dependence of the distribu-
tion  of arsenic and  antimony  dis-
charges with the primary test vari-
ables  was apparent. However,  a
statistical evaluation of  the  data
obtained is planned in future efforts.
This analysis will establish whether
statistically significant relationships
exist.
Carbon  tetrachloride  ORE  was
greater than 99.99 percent as mea-
sured  at the afterburner exit;  this
increased to greater than 99.999
percent as measured at the scrubber
exit.  Chlorobenzene  ORE  was
greater than 99.999 at the after-
burner exit, increasing to generally
greater than 99.9999 percent at the
scrubber exit No clear dependence
of DRE on incinerator operation was
apparent. This DRE performance is
consistent with past experience at
the CRF, so  the presence of  the
elements fed had no apparent effect
onPOHCDRE.
Several commonly measured chlori-
nated  C, and C2  hydrocarbons,
benzene, and toluene were present
in the  afterburner  exit  flue gas at
levels in the 10 to serveral hundred
//g/dscm range. These  same com-
pounds were generally present in
 Tab/tf 4.   Arsenic Flue Gas Distributions
                                               Arsenic distribution between
                                             paniculate and vapor phase in the
                                                    flue gas (percent)
Feed C1
Test content.
No. percent
14
4
5
7
13
18
16
2
3
6
9

15
ND —
33.8
26.4
27.1
26.4
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8

7.6
7.9
0
Not detected.
Primary
combustor
temperature,
°C (°F)
1,293 (2,359)
1.307 (2,384)
1,137(2.079)
1.399 12,551)
1,203(2,198)
1,176(2,148)
1,450(2,642)
1,336 (2.437)
1.228 (2.243)
1.290 (2.354)
1.425 (2.597)

1.265(2.310)

Afterburne
exit 02,
percent
9.2
10.5
10.8
6.1
11.8
10.7
7.4
9.2
8.4
10.1
5.9

8.1

r Afterburner exit
Paniculate
70
ND
ND
43
ND
32
76
83
41
71
69

98

Vapor
30
ND
ND
57
ND
68
24
17
59
29
31

2

Scrubber discharge
Paniculate
85
100
83
100
ND
100
10O
94
100
100
100

100

Vapor
15
0
17
0
ND
0
0
6
0
0
0

0

    the scrubber exit flue gas at levels
    about a factor of 10 lower.
  Data quality assurance objectives for
measurement precision  and accuracy
were not fully met for many measurement
parameters. However,  failure to attain
these had  little  impact on the above-
stated conclusions.
   Johannes W. Lee, Robert I/I/. Ross, II, Ralph H. Vocque, Jerry W. Lewis,  and
    Larry R. Water/and are with A cur ex Corporation, Jefferson, AR 72079.
   Robert E. Mournighan is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report,  entitled "Distribution of Trace Element Emissions from
    the Liquid Injection Incinerator Combustion Research Facility." (Order No.
    PB 87-224 689/AS; Cost: $13.95, subject to change) will be available only
    from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Officer can be contacted at:
          Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Cincinnati, OH 45268

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
    BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES P
       EPA
  PERMIT No G-3E
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-87/054
                           0001961
                          LIBRARy  REGION  V
                              r_
                          CHICAGO
                                                ST
                                                        60604

-------