United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-88/042  Aug. 1988
 Project  Summary

 Technical  Considerations  for
 De Minimis  Pollutant Transport
 Through  Polymeric  Liners

 R. W. Telles, S. L. Linger, H. R. Lubowitz, and Hinton K. Howard
  Based on an extensive survey  of
the literature, this report provides a
technical basis for  predicting the
transport of fluids through polymeric
liners used to confine pollutants  in
landfills and impoundments. When a
mixture of organic fluids, water, salts,
and other  substances are confined
by an intact  liner, first the organic
fluids permeate  according  to their
mobilities,  then  water.  Salts,
macromolecules,  and  micro-
organisms remain confined. These
phenomena indicate  that fluids are
transported by  the permeation
mechanism and  that  properly
selected and installed liners made
with  commodity resins  can  be
effective. Organic fluids can  be one
of the major factors in determining
de minimis values. These permeation
rates  can be appreciable; therefore,
impoundments  with  organic fluids
must be selectively designed so that
adequate  protection  of  health and
the environment is maintained.
  This  Project  Summary was
developed by EPA's Hazardous Waste
Engineering  Research Laboratory,
Cincinnati, OH, to  announce key
findings of the  research project that
is fully documented in  a separate
report of the same title (see Project
Report ordering information at back).

Introduction
  Polymeric  lined  landfills and
impoundments  are regulated  under
RCRA and  associated  background and
guidance documents. Pursuant  to
Section  3004[0]  and 3015  of the
 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
 of  1984 and  minimum  guidance
 technology for  double-liner  systems,
 polymeric liners must prevent migration
 of constituents of the waste liquid into the
 liner during the period the unit remains in
 operation (including any post-closure
 monitoring period) except for de minimis
 leakage. EPA recognizes that  polymeric
 liners will not always have zero leakage
 and that cte minimis leakage may occur.
 De minimis leakage can occur as a result
 of vapor passing through the liner, very
 small imperfections in the liner that occur
 very rarely, or a seam that has a very
 small crack or hole.
  The  full  report discusses some
 technical considerations regarding de
 minimis transport  rates  for polymeric
 liners. The considerations stem from an
 extensive  review  of  the technical
 literature. A  wide range  of published
 information  was reviewed,  including
 technical specifications in  vendor
 publications pertaining to liners.
  Properly  installed and  functioning
 polymeric liners are expected to allow the
 permeation  of  organic liquids  first,
 followed by water. They are expected to
 contain dissolved inorganic compounds
 such as salts.
  EPA believes that current  state-of-
 the-art  technology  for FML installation
 allows for hazardous waste management
 units to be built that will have  very low
 leakage rates at installation. EPA  does
 not  have a specific maximum de minimis
 leakage rate that can be  recommended.
 However, based on currently  available
 preliminary field data,  laboratory test

-------
results, and professional judgment.  EPA
believes that de minimis leakage should
be approximately  1  gallon/acre/day or
less. This rate should not be taken  as a
hard and fast  rule because  there are
conditions  where vapor transmission
potentially could exceed this value. Also,
this value  does  not  apply to  organic
liquids, many of which can  permeate an
FML independently of the water in waste
liquid.
   It is proposed that the cte minimis rate
for organic fluids can be based  on  their
rates of permeation  as determined by
experiment; or in   the  absence of
experimental data, as estimated  by the
permachor method, which is described in
this report.
   Because the total rate of flow through
liners can  be comprised of permeation
plus  flow through flaws, the  full report
also  describes  methods for estimating
the rate of fluid  flow  through liner flaws,
using the  Poiseuille  equation for small
flaws and the Bernoulli equation for large
flaws.

Procedures

Literature Search
   The preliminary search  of Chemical
Abstracts,  Applied  Science  and
Technology, and Dissertation Abstracts
International  provided the  basis  for the
key words to be used in  the extensive
computer search for relevant papers. The
computer  search   included  NTIS,
SCISEARCH,  ENVIROLINE,  Federal
Research in Progress and others.

Permachor Method
   In general, the permeability of a given
penetrant in a  polymer is derived  from
        transmission or  sorption-desorption
        experimental  data  obtained  under
        exacting  experimental  conditions
        However,  for  polyethylene  and
        polypropylene,  a simplified empirical
        method has been developed to estimate
        the permeability through these materials
        based on a number called the permachor
        which  is based on the  molecular
        structure of the permeant.  These
        empirical  numbers  are  derived from
        actual test data  and  assigned to each
        atom or atomic group in  the  repeating
        unit of polymer molecules.
           In the full report examples are given to
        show the calculation of permeation rates
        using permachor values. Comparisons to
        experimentally  determined  rates  are
        shown, and the restrictions regarding the
        utility of  permachor calculations  are
        discussed.
Flow Through Liner Flaws
  Analysis  of  circular  flaws in fre
draining liner systems is  based on th
Bernoulli equation for large flaws and th
Hagen-Poiseuille  equation  for  sma
flaws.  According  to the  Bernoul
equation, flow is dependent  upon th
hole diameter and the hydraulic head  t
the  one-half  power  According to th
Poiseuille equation,  flow through pinhole
is dependent upon the effluent density
hole diameter, hydraulic head,  line
thickness, and effluent viscosity
  These equations are discussed, alom
with their  limitations  Comparisons  c
measured  and calculated  flow rates an
given.
        R. W. Telles, S.  L  Unger,and   H.  R.  Lubowitz  are  with Environmental  Protection
             Polymers, Inc., Hawthorne, CA 90250. The  EPA author, Hinton K. Howard, is
             with the  Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  Oh
             45268.
        Car/ton C. Wiles is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
        The complete  report, entitled "Technical  Considerations  for De Minimis Pollutant
             Transport Through Polymeric  Liners," (Order No. PB 88-238  3321 AS; Cost.
             $14.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
                 National Technical Information Service
                 5285 Port Royal Road
                 Springfield, VA 22161
                 Telephone: 703-487-4650
        The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                 Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Cincinnati, OH 45268
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
              BULK RATE
         POSTAGE & FEES PAID
                  EPA
           PERMIT No. G-35
  Official Business
  Penalty for Private Use $300

  EPA/600/S2-88/042
                                             0001 9
                             ,£R  GN
              LIBRART  REGION  V
              US  EPA
              230  S  DEARBORN  ST
              CHICAGO               IL
                                                                            60604

-------