\ 1 /
                   United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Risk Reduction
Engineering Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-89/016 Jan. 1990
&EPA          Project  Summary

                    Baghouse  Efficiency on  a
                    Multiple  Hearth  Incinerator
                    Burning  Sewage  Sludge
                    R. C. Adams, L. E. Keller, E. V. Robb, M. C. Vancil and Joseph B. Farrell
                     A  pilot-scale  fabric  filter
                   (baghouse)  was evaluated for  its
                   performance in removing 23 metals
                   and sulfur as well as total  particles
                   when fitted to a multiple hearth
                   incinerator burning sewage sludge.
                   The small-scale baghouse was
                   installed to take a slipstream of about
                   3% of the total Incinerator emissions.
                   Particle size  fractions were collected
                   from the gas streams  entering and
                   leaving  the baghouse.  Each particle
                   size fraction  was analyzed for  the 24
                   elemental species,  and baghouse
                   performance  was  evaluated  for
                   overall removal  efficiency, size
                   fraction removal efficiency, and for
                   selective removal of  specific metals.
                   Total concentrations of  each element
                   In the controlled emission stream
                   were determined as  well as  the
                   proportionate concentrations  of
                   species in the solid  and volatile
                   states. Concentrations of each metal
                   in  the emission  stream  were
                   compared with the concentrations In
                   a sludge residue. To obtain compar-
                   isons of baghouse performance with
                   a  more typical  emission control
                   device, the performance of the
                   incinerator's  full-scale  wet scrubber
                   was also evaluated.
                     The efficiency of the  baghouse for
                   collection of total particles was 99%
                   compared with  94%  for the wet
                   scrubber system.  Its collection
                   efficiency was superior for cadmium,
                   but the wet scrubber was much more
                   efficient for collection of sulfur.
                      This Project Summary  was
                   developed by EPA's fl/sfc Reduction
Engineering  Laboratory, Cincinnati,
OH, to announce key findings of the
research protect  that  is fully
documented  in a separate report of
the same title (see  Project Report
ordering information at back).

Introduction
   This research project was undertaken
to determine  the particulate removal
efficiency of  a  fabric filter  emissions
control  system installed on a  multiple
hearth furnace burning sewage sludge.
Of particular  interest was the fate of
metals found  in  a city/industrial type of
sludge when incinerated and subjected to
fabric filter (baghouse) air  pollution
control. A pilot-scale baghouse was
temporarily fitted to an existing multiple
hearth furnace burning digested and
dewatered sewage sludge. A slipstream
of incinerator exhaust gas, amounting to
about 3% of the total incinerator exhaust,
was taken from  the top hearth of the
incinerator. This  afforded an opportunity
to compare baghouse performance with
the particulate removal performance of
the incinerator's wet scrubber.

Procedure
   The  full-scale, six hearth, multiple
hearth incinerator was fitted with ducting
to take a  slipstream of uncontrolled
emissions. The slipstream was fed to the
baghouse at  temperatures averaging
411 °F. The top hearth temperature of the
incinerator averaged 747"F during
baghouse operation.
   Emission tests were first conducted at
the inlet and the outlet of the incinerator's

-------
wet scrubber;  these were  followed  by
tests of the baghouse performance.  A
Source Assessment  sampling train
(SASS) was used to collect particle size
fractions  of diameters of  >10  jim
(micrometer), 3 to 10 urn, and <1 urn. To
collect volatile metals,  impingers
(bubblers) were  located downstream of
the particle sizing part of the train.  The
impingers were immersed in an ice bath.
A weak solution of nitric acid was used to
facilitate capture of the metals.
   Metals  were  analyzed  by   the
inductively coupled argon plasma method
(ICAP). The concentrations  of 23 target
metals plus sulfur  were determined in
each particle size fraction and in  the
impinger catches.  From  these  results,
concentrations  of each metal  in  the
controlled  and   uncontrolled emission
streams,  in  each particle  size  fraction,
and in the  impinger  catches were
determined, as  were overall efficiencies
of the emission control  devices  and
removal performance  of the individual
metals and the specific particle fractions.
Results and Discussion
   In addition to assessing the fate of the
metals in the uncontrolled and controlled
emissions from the  incinerator,  the
baghouse and the scrubber system were
compared. The  devices were not tested
simultaneously,  which  lessens the value
of the  comparison,  but differences were
so great that results can be viewed with
confidence.  The  baghouse proved to be
much more effective for removing total
particulates than  did the  scrubber
system. Baghouse  efficiency averaged
99.1% for  the  three  baghouse  runs
       whereas the average efficiency for  the
       scrubber runs was  94.3% (Table 1). An
       examination of collection efficiencies for
       individual particle  size  fractions  shows
       that the  scrubber  was  inefficient  in
       collecting particles  finer than 1 nm;  the
       baghouse was efficient for all  fractions.
       Both  devices  showed 100%  efficiencies
       for the 3-nm  and  l-pm catches. This
       does  not  necessarily  reflect  their
       performance for these fractions. For an
       unknown  reason,  the  uncontrolled
       emissions contained very little mass in
       these  size  fractions.  Because  recovery
       downstream of the air  pollution control
       devices Was negligible for these fractions,
       efficiencies were calculated as 100%.
         Contamination  reduced the  value  of
       the results  for several  elements,  most
       particularly  chromium  and  aluminum.
       Effects of  contamination  were  most
       pronounced for the controlled emissions
       because mass collected for the SASS
       train  fractions  was small and a  small
       amount  of  contamination produced  a
       large effect. Contaminants in  the filter
       paper affected results for several metals
       in the <1 urn catch, and dissolution of
       stainless  steel   contaminated  the
       impingers (bubblers) as  well as  the
       "probe +  10-iirn"  catch.  Only  results
       unaffected  by these problems are
       reported below.
         Uncontrolled particulate  emissions
       showed substantial enrichment for three
       metals: cadmium, lead, and tin.  These
       metals also were present in unusually
       high proportion in the finest  fraction (<1
       |im).  These metals may volatilize during
       combustion  and  condense to  fine
                                 particles or adsorb on the finest p
                                 leaving the incinerator.
                                    In the controlled emissions, a
                                 removal efficiency  averaged 82%
                                 wet scrubbing system and 98.5%
                                 baghouse. Efficiency was low for 1
                                 scrubber because the scrubber eff
                                 was  low  for  the  < 1  pm  filter
                                 fraction, and most of the cadmium
                                 this fraction.
                                    The  enrichment  ratio for ca
                                 increased from 25.6  for  uncon
                                 emissions to 75.4  at the scrubbei
                                 and to 47.1  at the baghouse outlc
                                 concentration  of cadmium  in the
                                 fraction  combined  with poor col
                                 efficiency  for the  finest fn
                                 accounted for the  large  incree
                                 enrichment ratio for the scrubbei
                                 increase  was not  as  large  fc
                                 baghouse because collection effii
                                 for the  finest fraction  was only :
                                 lower than that for the other fraction
                                    The scrubber showed a  99% n
                                 for sulfur whereas the baghouse rei
                                 very little sulfur.  If  SO2  remo
                                 important, a baghouse  would have
                                 preceded  or  followed by at  least
                                 pressure drop wet scrubber.
                                    Visual observation showed a c
                                 plume, which indicated  significant o
                                 emission,  and condensation  of  a
                                 layer on surfaces.  Pressure drop i
                                 the filter  bags rose slowly  durin
                                 tests, indicating that the bags requ
                                 more vigorous cleaning  procedure
                                 baghouse supplier  noted that
                                 samples from the bag were high in
                                 volatiles"  (water and/or volatile  oi
                                 compounds).
                Table 1.  Particulate Removal Efficiency by S4SS Size Fraction

Baghouse
Run 6
Run?
Run 8
Average
Probe +
10 itm

99.3760
99. 1 470
97.3230
98.6150
3 pm
Cyclone

100.0000
100.0000
100.0000
100.0000
1 ton
Cyclone

100.0000
100.0000
100.0000
100.0000
Filler
Catch

97.7570
98.7090
99.4260
90.6370
Total

99.4660
99.4300
98.4180
99.1050
                 Scrubber
                     Run 2
                     Run3
                     Run 4
                     Average
94.7800
98.9140
99.3110
97.6680
100.0000
100.0000

100.0000
100.0000
100.0000
100.0000

100.0000
100.0000
54.6930
64.2670

58.3740
59.1110
91.9460
95.7600
95.1460
94.2820

-------
 elusions and
 ommendations
 e superiority of the baghouse  over
wet scrubber system for collecting
 particles and most  metals  was
 ly established.  On the  other hand,
 et scrubber system collected sulfur
h  more  efficiently than  did the
 ouse.
   The colored  plume, an  oily layer on
some surfaces, and the  presence of
"early volatiles" in the dust collected on
the filter bags indicated the  presence of a
substantial  proportion of  unburned
hydrocarbons,  which  could  adversely
affect the long-term performance of a
baghouse. Use  of an afterburner would
obviate  this problem, but if an after-
burner were not to be used, a long-term
test of a bag filter would be advisable to
verify  that  the  filters  would  not  be
clogged by oily discharges.
   The full  report  was  submitted  in
fulfillment of Contract No. 68-03-3148 by
Radian   Corporation  under  the
sponsorship of the  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency.

-------
  R. C. Adams, L. E. Keller, E.  V. Robb, and M. C. Vancil are with Radian Corp.,
       Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. The EPA author, Joseph B. Farrell, is
       also one of the EPA Project Officers (see below)
  Howard Wall and Joseph B. Farrell are the EPA Project Officers (see below).
  The  complete report, entitled "Baghouse  Efficiency  on a  Multiple Hearth
       Incinerator Burning  Sewage Sludge" (Order No. PB 89-190 318/AS; Cost:
       $28.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Royal Road
           Springfield, VA22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officers can  be contacted at:
           Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-89/016
UNOFFICIAL MAIL:
                                                           MtCTER
                                                         6090444
                                                                                                5 0 2 5 H
    . 000085833   PS

-------