United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                    Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-83-050  Sept. 1983
4>EPA         Project  Summary
                    Love  Canal  Monitoring
                    Program—Final   Report:
                    Volume  1
                    Robert Bradway and Rosemary Elersick
                      EPA, with the technical assistance of
                    GCA/Technology Division, conducted
                    the Love Canal Monitoring Program in
                    1980 to evaluate pollutant levels pres-
                    ent in the Love Canal Area of Niagara
                    Falls, New York. The Environmental
                    Monitoring Systems Laboratory (EMSL)/
                    Las Vegas, Environmental Monitoring
                    Systems Laboratory (EMSLJ/Research
                    Triangle Park, Environmental Monitor-
                    ing and Support Laboratory (EMSL)/
                    Cincinnati, Health Effects Research
                    Laboratory (HERL)XResearch Triangle
                    Park, and the  Robert S. Kerr Environ-
                    mental Research Laboratory (ERL)/
                    Ada, Oklahoma, collaborated on the
                    design of the study. EMSL/RTP was
                    the coordinating EPA laboratory. GCA
                    Corporation managed the program and
                    ensured its timely completion through
                    the use of selected subcontractors.
                      The program involved a geotechnical
                    study and a multifaceted sampling and
                    analytical effort designed to detect and
                    quantify a variety of trace metals, vola-
                    tile organics, pesticides and other com-
                    pounds in soil, sediment, air, biota, and
                    water samples.
                      GCA describes its contract activity
                    in implementing the EPA-designed
                    monitoring program. This Project Sum-
                    mary was developed by the Environ-
                    mental Monitoring  Systems Labora-
                    tory, Research Triangle Park, NC, to
                    briefly outline activities of the tech-
                    nical management project  which is
                    fully documented in a separate report
                    of the same title (see Project Report
                    ordering information at back).

                    Introduction
                      On May 21,1980, the area of the Love
                    Canal declared  as a National Emergency
                    was extended from those homes directly
                    surrounding the dump site to a more
general area defined by Bergholtz Creek
on the north, Cayuga Creek on the west
the Niagara River and Little River on the
south, and Williams Road on the east
GCA/Technology Division was issued a
task on July 9,  1 980 to assist  EPA  in
completing the  Love Canal Monitoring
Program  in a  short time period. As re-
quired, field sampling was completed by
October 31, 1980.
  EMSL/Las Vegas, EMSL/Research Tri-
angle Park, EMSL/Cincinnati, HERL/Re-
search Triangle Park,  and ERL/Ada col-
laborated  on  the design of the  study.
EMSL/RTP was the coordinating EPA
laboratory. Each  of the EPA laboratories
provided technical advice and quality con-
trol activities and determined the validity
of the data generated.
  Although the various EPA laboratories
had designed  the overall study and pro-
vided detailed protocols for many of the
program elements,  GCA coordinated and
implemented  these procedures into a
manageable system. GCA organized its
efforts into seven technical areas; the
following paragraphs briefly outline activi-
ties in these areas.

Technical Program Areas

Health and Safety

  A comprehensive safety and health plan
was developed that specified procedures
to help protect all Love Canal Monitoring
Project personnel.  The complexity and
variety of chemical agents thought to  be
present at the Love Canal made it neces-
sary to design a highly flexible yet con-
servative program  of worker protection.
The advice of  consultants and safety and
health guidelines provided by the Federal
Government and the  State of  New York
were used to design this program.

-------
Quality Assurance/Quality
Control (QA/QC)

  GCA prepared and implemented a com-
prehensive 4-volume Quality Assurance
Plan incorporating EPA's QC requirements
and providing step-by-step sampling and
analysis procedures.
  An important objective of the quality
control  program was to emphasize the
importance  of high  quality  work. GCA
accomplished  this objective by: (1)  in-
cluding general QA/QC requirements in
the Requests for Proposal (RFP)  for all
subcontracted technical work and EPA's
specific internal QC requirements in each
analytical subcontract document, and (2)
requiring subcontractor QA  Plans, QC
coordinators with expertise in each tech-
nical area, written sampling and analysis
procedures including QC requirements and
planned  corrective actions, performance
evaluation and QC check samples for ana-
lytical work, and continuing communica-
tion between GCA and its subcontractors.

Sampling

  The Love Canal area was divided intol 1
sampling areas to group individual dwell-
ings into homogeneous sets that could be
handled differently as the data might indi-
cate. The sampling area definitions were
based on physical boundaries,  locations
with  respect to the Canal, and surface
draining patterns.
  The overall program design  and the
specific  sampling protocols were devel-
oped by EPA GCA acquired via competitive
bids a qualified subcontractor to  collect
the multimedia samples for subsequent
analysis for volatile organics, semivolatile
organics, pesticides, inorganics and radio-
activity.
  Air samples were collected in the living
area of homes, in basements,  and  out-
doors with Tenax,   polyurethane foam
(PDF) and  Hi-Vol samplers. Water sam-
ples were collected from drinking water
supplies, sewers, basement sumps, rivers,
streams, and  ground water  monitoring
wells. Soil  and sediment samples were
collected throughout the study area. Also,
plant and animal samples were collected.
  GCA  managed the sampling and geo-
technical activities from a field office near
the Love Canal.  All  individuals  involved
with the field operations were required to
report to the field office at the beginning
and  end of each  day as a management
control and to ensure that the latest tech-
nical and safety directives were given to all
participants.
Geotechnical
  The  geotechnical portion of the Love
Canal Study was designed principally by
the EPA's Robert  S. Kerr Laboratory in
Ada, Oklahoma. It consisted of the follow-
ing activities:
  • Geophysical measurements such as
     ground  penetrating radar, electro-
     magnetic conductivity, and magne-
     tometry to determine  subsurface
     characteristics.
  • Hydrogeological investigation includ-
     ing the installation of 1 74 monitor-
     ing wells.
  • Ground water modeling to predict
     ground  water movement in each
     aquifer.
  GCA obtained subcontractors to  per-
form the analyses. Ada staff were on site to
provide technical advice during the field
program.

Analysis

  The  analytical protocols were provided
by  EPA, and subcontractor laboratories
analyzed the collected samples. In addi-
tion, the subcontractor laboratories pre-
pared the Tenax and PUF cartridges and
the Tenax cartridge standards  and spikes
used in the air monitoring program. The
HERL/RTP prepared the QC standards
and spikes for the  PUF cartridges.
  The  listing of elements and compounds
to be  analyzed in  each type  of sample
collected at  Love Canal is presented in
Appendix A to GCA's Final Report.  These
complete listings were developed by EPA
specifically for the Love Canal Monitoring
Program. In many cases,  these listings
differ from the analyte listings for pollutant
classes (such as volatile organics or pesti-
cides)  contained in Federal Register ana-
lytical methods.
  Air samples were collected on Tenax for
analysis of volatile organic compounds, on
polyurethane foam (PUF) for  analysis of
pesticides and related compounds, and on
Hi-Vol  filters for metals analysis.
  The  water samples were analyzed for
volatile organics, semivolatile organics,
pesticides,  metals, fluoride, and nitrate.
Ground water samples were also analyzed
for  total organic carbon (TOC), total or-
ganic halides (TOX), pH, and conductivity.
  Soil  and sediment samples were ana-
lyzed  for volatile  organics, semivolatile
organics, pesticides and metals. Because
no  widely-accepted methods  existed for
the  analysis  of semivolatiles in  these
media,  a methods evaluation was con-
ducted on 48 samples to determine which
of three available  procedures was most
suitable. The  subcontractors used the
method determined by this evaluation foi
the remainder of the program.
  Biota samples were analyzed for organic
and inorganic species on the Love Cana
Monitoring List  Mice, worms,  and  cray-
fish were analyzed for semivolatile organics
and  pesticides.  Potatoes  and oatmea
placed at the sampling sites were desig-
nated as "foodstuffs" and analyzed  foi
volatile organic compounds. Metals were
measured in vegetation and in  hair.

Sample Bank
  GCA personnel set up and staffed the
sample bank and managed all aspects ol
sample handling, chain  of custody pro-
cedures, and document control.  The Sam-
ple Bank Manager served as GCA's Docu-
ment Control Officer onsite and directed
the dispensing of sample tags,  field data
sheets and custody records,  the accept-
ance of field samples and maintenance of
their chain of custody, and the shipment of
the field samples to the appropriate analyt-
ical laboratories. The field samples  were
logged in a Master Lob Book and identified
with the analytical  tags so that the ana-
lytical  laboratories  did not receive the
information on  sample collection  tags
(sampling location,  blank, duplicate etc.).
This reidentification step enabled the in-
sertion of  external QC  samples in the
sample shipments.

Data Management
  The purpose  of the  data management
system was to  collect and store all data
from the Love Canal Monitoring Program
and to pr6vide basic reports of  the moni-
toring results. A software system with the
capacity to  handle and store more than
330,000 data records was designed and
implemented by GCA's data management
staff.  Media-specific coding forms and
manuals were developed for sampling and
analysis data and  supplied to the sub-
contractors for data reporting. Many spe-
cialized computer reports were provided
to EPA during the study; a tape of the final
validated  data   base  was provided to
EPA/RTP.

-------
     Robert Bradway and Rosemary Elersick are with GCA Corporation Technology
       Division, Bedford. MA 01730.
     Steven M. Bromberg is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
     The complete report, entitled "Love Canal Monitoring Program—Final Report:
      •JSSffi8^ " (Order No. PB 83-253 534; Cost: $ 19.00, subject to change) will be
       available only from:
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield, VA 22161
             Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
             Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                  *US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1983-659-017/7180
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
               Center for Environmental Research
               Information
               Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
5         °2
                                                      AGENCY
                     CHICAGO  IL  60604

-------