United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
 Environmental Monitoring
 Systems Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                   Research and Development
 EPA/600/S4-88/002  Mar. 1988
oEPA         Project  Summary
                   Stability of Parts-Per-Million
                   Organic  Cylinder Gases  and
                   Results  of  Source  Test Analysis
                   Audits—Status  Report #9
                   G. B. Howe, J. R. Albritton, C. K. Sokol, R. K. M. Jayanty, C. E. Decker, and
                   D. J. von Lehmden
                    The U.S. Environmental Protection
                   Agency (EPA) has evaluated the suit-
                   ability of 45 gaseous compounds
                   including hydrocarbons, halocarbons,
                   oxygenated, and sulfurous species for
                   use as standards for measuring station-
                   ary source emissions. The main objec-
                   tives of this on-going project are (1) to
                   provide gas mixtures to EPA,  state/
                   local agencies, or their contractors, as
                   performance audit standards to assess
                   the accuracy of  measuring source
                   emissions from certain organic chem-
                   ical manufacturing industries,  (2) to
                   corroborate  the vendor's certified
                   analysis of the gas mixtures by in-house
                   analysis, (3) to determine the stability
                   of the  gas mixtures with time by in-
                   house analysis, and (4) to explore the
                   feasibility of  new audit materials as
                   requested by EPA.
                    Thus far, 31 mixtures have been used
                   to conduct 214 different audits.  The
                   results of these audits, a description of
                   the experimental procedures used for
                   analyses,  and available stability data
                   are presented in the full status report.
                    Compound stabilities have been
                   determined through multiple analyses
                   of the cylinders  containing  them.
                   Stability data for up to 8 years is
                   available for many compounds and over
                   5 years for most  compounds. Com-
                   pounds that  are  unstable and  not
                   suitable for use as an audit material are
                   identified.
                    This Project Summary was  devel-
                   oped by EPA's Environmental Monitor-
ing Systems Laboratory, Research
Triangle Park, NC. to announce key
findings of the research project that is
fully documented in a separate report
of the same title (see Project Report
ordering information at back).

Introduction
  Accurate  measurement of hydrocar-
bons, halocarbons, and sulfur-containing
compounds  in ambient and  source
samples is essential to any environmen-
tal monitoring program. The potential for
achieving  acceptable  accuracy  is
enhanced by the availability of  reliable
standards that can be used to check or
validate the measurement process. The
Research Triangle Institute (RTI) under
contract to the Environmental Monitor-
ing Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA), has
responded to this need  through the
development of cylinder gases for 39
compounds. These gaseous compounds
are to be used in performance audits as
designated by the EPA  Project  Officer.
These performance audits are to assess
the accuracy of source  emission mea-
surements in certain organic manufac-
turing industries.
  Currently 45 different compounds
have been investigated  as audit mate-
rials. Six of these gaseous compounds
have been  found to be unstable  in
cylinders and not suitable as audit
materials. The other 39 gaseous com-
pounds in the repository are suitable for
conducting performance audits  during

-------
source testing.  Table 1  lists  the 45
compounds, the concentration ranges for
each compound, the number of cylinders
of each  compound, and  the cylinder
construction material. Additional com-
pounds are procured, as needed.
  The gaseous compounds are acquired
from  commercial  suppliers  in  com-
pressed  gas cylinders; these same
cylinders, along  with an  appropriate
delivery system,  are used  directly  as
sources  of the  gaseous  compounds
during performance audits. The com-
pressed gas cylinder is especially suit-
able as an audit  device because of  its
simplicity, portability, low cost, flexibility
in analyte delivery over a broad concen-
tration range, reliability, and ruggedness
for  interstate shipping. The accuracy of
the supplier-reported  levels of these
compounds  are verified  through meaj
surement using National  Bureau of
Standards -  Standard Reference Mate-
rials (NBS-SRMs), commercial perme-
ation tubes,  and/or reagent grade pure
liquids as standards.  The  permeation
rates of the commercially available tubes
are verified by RTI before use.
  The accuracy of the "known" cylinder
concentrations  and the stability of  the
Table 1.    A udit Materials Currently in the Repository

                                    Low Concentration flange
                                           High Concentration flange
Compound
Benzene
Ethylene

Propylene
Methane/ Ethane

Propane

Toluene
Hydrogen Sulfide
Meta-Xylene
Methyl Acetate
Chloroform
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Mercaptan
Hexane
1 ,2 -Dichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methanol
1 ,2 -Dichloropropane
Trichloroethylene
1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene
1 ,2 -Dibromoethylene* *
Perchloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
J, 3 -Butadiene
Acrylonitrile
Aniline**
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Paradichlorobenzene * *
Ethylamine**
Formaldehyde**
Methyl Chloride
Carbon Tetrachloride
Freon 113
Methyl Chloroform
Ethylene Oxide
Propylene Oxide
Ally 1 Chloride
Acrolein
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Disulfide
Cyclohexanone * *
EPA Method 25 Mixture***
Ethylene Dibromide
Tetrachloroethane
No. of
Cylinders
7
3

3
-

3

4
6
2
2
4
1
3
2
4
--
4
1
2
2
2
--
2
8
3
3
--
1
—
--
--
4
4
1
1
5
1
1
1
3
--
--
6
2
1
Concentration
Range Ippm)
5 -
5 -

5 -
--

5 -

5 •
5 -
5 -
5 -
5 -
5 -
3 -
20 -
5 -
--
5 -
30 -
3 -
5 -
5 -
--
5 -
5 -
5 -
5 -
--
5 -
--
--
--
1 -
5 -
5 -
5 -
5 -
5 •
5 -
5 -
5 -
--
--
100 -
5 •
5 -
20
20

20


20

20
SO
20
20
20
20
10
90
20

50
80
20
20
20

20
30
60
20

20



20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


200
20
20
Cylinder
Construction*
S
Al

Al
--

Al

Al
Al
S
S
S
Al
Al
Al
Al
-
S
Al
Al
Al
Al
—
S
S
Al
Al
--
Al
—
-
-•
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
S
Al
Al
--
--
Al
S
S
No. of
Cylinders
10
4
6
3
4

3
4
4
7
2
2
1
4
--
--
4
1
--
--
2
2
2
--
2
-•
--
/
--
--

--
--
--
--
--
--
--
/
7
;
--
1
--
4
2
--
Concentration Cylinder
Range fppm) Construction*
60
300
3,000
300
1.000 -
200 -
300
- 400
- 700
- 20.000
- 700
9,000(M),
800(E)
- 700
1.000-20.000
100
100
300
300
300
100


100
80


300
100
100

300


300










75
75
100

75

750
50

- 700
- 700
- 700
- 700
- 700
- 400

--
- 600
- 200
--
-.
- 700
- 600
- 600
--
- 700
-
--
- 500
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
- 200
- 200
- 300
--
- 200
--
- 2,000
- 300
"
S
Al
Al
Al
Al

Al
Al
LS
Al
LS
S
S
Al
--
--
Al
Al
--

Al
Al
Al
--
LS
--
--
Al
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
—
Al
S
Al
--
Al
—
Al
S
"
  *AI = Aluminum: S = Steel; LS = Low Pressure Steel.
 **Cylinders are no longer available; the compounds were found to be unstable in the cylinders.
 **The gas mixture contains an aliphatic hydrocarbon,  an aromatic hydrocarbon,  and carbon dioxide in nitrogen. Concentrations shown are
   in ppmC.

-------
 compounds in the cylinders are impor-
 tant. Along  with acquisition  of  new
 compounds  and verification of their
 concentrations,  an  extensive  stability
 study  is  being  performed.  This  study
 involves periodic analyses of the  con-
 tents of each of the  cylinders in  the
 repository.


 Procedure
   Once a compound is chosen, a com-
 mercial supplier is  contacted to deter-
 mine if a cylinder containing that com-
 pound  can  be  prepared.  If  so, the
 manufacturer  prepares  the cylinder
 gases and determines the  concentration
 of the analyte in the cylinder. The cylinder
 is sent to RTI  where  its  contents are
 analyzed usually within seven days of its
 arrival.  If the RTI value varies from the
 manufacturer's value by more than 10
 percent, an analysis is performed by a
 third party (EPA or NBS). The cylinder
 contents are then analyzed one month
 after acquisition,  two months after
 acquisition,  and   one   year  after
 acquisition.
   All analyses are carried  out using gas
 chromatography (GC).  The column and
 detector are chosen so as to be optimum
 for the compound being measured. Three
 types of standards are used to generate
 gas  concentrations for calibration of the
 GC for the measurement of audit mate-
 rials. National  Bureau of Standards  -
 Standard  Reference  Materials (NBS-
 SRMs) of methane and propane are used
 as standards for the  measurement of
 methane  and propane audit materials.
. Propane is used to calibrate the chroma-
 tographic  system for  measurement of
 ethane, ethylene and propylene, assum-
 ing  the FID response per  carbon is
 constant from compound  to compound.
 In a few others (e.g., vinyl chloride,
 ethylene  oxide)  gaseous standards are
 generated using permeation tubes. The
 standards for most  of the other audit
 materials are prepared using pure liquids
 which are volatilized in a clean glass bulb
 or stainless steel sphere.
   Audit requests are directed to  RTI
 through the EPA Project Officer. The
 cylinder is then shipped by a freight
 carrier  to the laboratory being audited.
 A letter that provides general instruc-
 tions for performing the audit is included
 with the cylinders. The audit concentra-
 tions  are provided  to the  requesting
 agency  audit  coordinator.  After  the
 laboratory being audited  has analyzed
 the  contents of the cylinder, the audit
 coordinator reports the value(s) to RTI,
which in turn reports both the measured
and  accepted values  to  the Project
Officer.  The laboratory being audited
then is responsible  for  shipping  the
cylinder back to RTI.

Results and Discussion
  To date,  214 individual audits have
been initiated and 194 are complete. The
results  obtained  for  a  few typical
performance audits are shown in Table
2 and the rest are given in the fall status
report. Generally, the results of  the
audits show close agreement  (± 15%)
with the actual cylinder concentrations
measured by RTI.
  Most of the cylinder gases are analyzed
at least four  times  to determine  the
stability of these compounds;  some are
analyzed as many as nine  times. Abso-
lute accuracies for the cylinder analyses
have not been determined due to lack
of NBS standards for most of the organic
gas mixtures above one ppm. An exam-
ination of the analysis data shows values
for individual cylinder analyses usually
vary by less than ten  percent for four to
nine analyses  over two to seven years.
As the number of analyses per cylinder
increases, detailed statistical analyses
will be performed. Statistical analyses for
ten halocarbons and eight other organics
are presented in two  journal publica-
tions1'2  and the statistical analyses for
the remaining compounds will be pres-
ented in a future report.

Conclusions
  Cylinder gases of hydrocarbons, halo-
carbons, and sulfur species  have been
used successfully to assess the accuracy
of gas chromatographic systems used to
measure organic compounds in source
emissions.  Absolute accuracy has not
been determined  because  of lack of
standard reference  materials; instead


Table 2.    Typical Audit Results
interlaboratory bias has been reported for
the performance audits conducted during
source testing. The interlaboratory bias
determined has been generally within 15
percent for both low and high  concen-
tration gases.
  Thirty-nine out of  45 gaseous com-
pounds have demonstrated sufficient
stability in cylinders for use as audit
materials. Six compounds (ethylamine,
paradichlorobenzene,  cyclohexanone,
formaldehyde, 1,2-dibromoethylene and
aniline) are not recommended  as audit
materials  for various reasons as  dis-
cussed in the full status report.  Detailed
statistical  analyses which would separ-
ate statistical  deviations from  true
concentration changes with time for 18
gaseous compounds have been  pub-
lished in a  journal publication and
statistical  analyses  for the remaining
compounds will be presented in a future
report.
References

  1.  R. K. M. Jayanty, C. Parker, C.  E.
     Decker, W. F. Gutknecht, J. E. Knoll
     and D.  J. von Lehmden,  "Quality
     Assurance for Emission  Analysis
     Systems," Environmetnal Science
     and Technology,  77(6):257-263A
     (1983).
  2.  G.  B. Howe, R. K. M. Jayanty, A.
     V.  Rao, W. F. Gutknecht,  C.  E.
     Decker, and D. J. von Lehmden,
     "Evaluation of Selection  Gaseous
     Halocarbons for Use in Source Test
     Performance Audits," J.  of Air
     Pollution  Control Association,
     33(9):823-826(1983).
Industry
Maleic anhydride
production
Vinyl chloride
production
Vegetable oil plant
Degreasing Vent
Audit Material
Benzene in /V2
7 ,2 -Dichloroethane
inNz
Hexane in N2
Trichloroethylene
inNi
Cylinder
Concentration
(ppm)
138
300
9.3
462
82.2
1982
14.9
566
Client Audit
Bias (%)
-9.4
+4.7
+6.0
+3.7
+5.6
+3.0
-0.4
-8.7

-------
    G. B. Howe.  J. R. Albritton, C. K.  Sokol. R. K.  M. Jayanty. and C. E. Decker
      are with Research Triangle Institute. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    DarrylJ. von Lehmden is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
    The  complete report, entitled "Stability of Parts-Per-Million Organic Cylinder
      Gases and Results of Source Test Analysis Audits—Status Report #3," (Order
      No. PB 88-158 761 /AS; Cost: $14.95, subject to change) will be available
      only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Officer can be contacted at:
            Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
            U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300

EPA/600/S4-88/002
                                                                 I  ,.. i.ico  ,, n   / y
                                                                       * :  -. U  .(. £
                                                         /•), ,ir, /  .  r;rTEP
                                                        -iilii^ f... ^103 i
                             PS
                CHICAGO
                                                                                 •ft-U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1988— 548-013/

-------