United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory
Las Vegas NV 89193-3478
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S4-88/038  July 1989
&EPA         Project  Summary
                   Production  and  Management  of
                   Small-Quantity-Generator
                   Hazardous-Waste in  Florida
                   R. C. Herndon, J. E. Moerlins, E, B. Jones V. W. Lambou, and
                   J. D. Koutsandreas
                    Data  are presented  on  the
                   production  and management of
                   hazardous waste by approximately
                   20,000 small-quantity  hazardous-
                   waste generators (SQHWGs)  in the
                   state of  Florida. SQHWGs  are
                   generators that  produce  less than
                   1,000  kilograms of hazardous-waste
                   in a calendar month. These data were
                   collected as part of the Florida Local-
                   Government  Hazardous-Waste
                   Assessment Program and  made
                   available to us for analysis.  There
                   were  approximately 117,000  metric
                   tons  of small quantity-generator
                   (SQG) hazardous  waste  produced
                   annually. Approximately half of this
                   hazardous waste  is managed using
                   the following methods: recycling,
                   treatment, and disposal in permitted
                   hazardous-waste-management facil-
                   ities. However, large quantities of this
                   SQG hazardous waste are disposed
                   of In sanitary landfills and discharged
                   to public sewers and these facilities
                   are typically not designed to  handle
                   hazardous waste. These data indicate
                   that there are potential environmental
                   and  human-health  problems associ-
                   ated with the management of SQG
                   hazardous waste in Florida as well as
                   throughout the U.S.A.
                    This Project Summary  was  devel-
                   oped  by EPA's Environmental Moni-
                   toring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas,
                   NV, to announce key  findings  of the
                   research project that is  fully docu-
                   mented in a separate report  of trie
                   same title  (see  Project Report
                   ordering information at back).
Introduction
  In order to address the issue of the
small-quantity hazardous-waste generator
(SQHWG), as well as other solid waste
concerns, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) was enacted in the
United States in 1976 and was amended
in  1984.  The RCRA  provides a legal
framework for coordinating federal, state,
and  local-government solid  waste
management in  the U.S.A. Subtitle D of
the RCRA  is  concerned with waste-
management facilities  that are generally
considered, or by regulations are defined
as facilities  that manage non-hazardous
waste. Data on the production  and
management of small-quantity-generator
(SQG) hazardous waste is needed in
order to  determine  the problems
associated with its generation and to
formulate regulations that will  minimize
its impact on human health and  the
environment. This report characterizes
the types and  amounts  of SQG
hazardous waste produced and how it is
managed by approximately 20,000 firms
and agencies in the state of Florida.
  The RCRA regulates the management
of  both hazardous  and non-hazardous
solid  waste  in the U.S.A. A SQHWG is
defined in Section 260.10, Chapter 40 of
the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations as
"a generator that generates  less than
1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste in a
calendar month." The RCRA regulations,
as of March  24,  1986, define  two
categories  of  SQHWGs: (1) those
generating less  than 100 kilograms of
hazardous waste in a calendar month,
and (2) those generating between  100-

-------
1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste in a
calendar month.  According to federal
regulations,  SQHWGs that  produce
between   100-1,000  kilograms  of
hazardous  waste  in a calendar mooth
must  manage their waste at  facilities
designed and permitted under Subtitle C
of the RCRA to accept hazardous waste.
Generators  that produce  less  than 100
kilograms  of  hazardous waste are  not
prohibited  by  federal  regulations from
disposing  of  their hazardous  waste  in
Subtitle D facilities  such  as  sanitary
landfills.
  Hazardous  waste  is defined in  Part
261, Chapter  40 of  the U.S.A. Code of
Federal Regulations  as  waste that is
characteristically  either corrosive,
reactive, ignitable or toxic. These four
characteristics have  been  used by  the
U.S. EPA and others to develop lists of
specific chemicals as well as  process-
waste  streams that   have  been
determined to be "hazardous."
  Counties  in  the state of Florida vary
considerably  in geographic  size,
population,  economic  profile,  geology,
hydrology, and the number and types of
waste-management facilities available in
each county. Because of this diversity, it
is  believed that  the data  on  SQG
hazardous waste produced in Florida are
generally representative of the types and
quantities  of  SQG  hazardous waste
produced as well as representative of the
management practices used throughout
the U.S.A.

Materials and Methods
  The  SQG  hazardous-waste  data
presented in the report were collected as
part  of the  Florida Local  Government
Hazardous Waste Assessment Program.
The Florida Local Government Hazardous
Waste Assessment Program requires all
counties  in   Florida  to  conduct
assessments of hazardous-waste-related
activities  in their  jurisdictions under
guidelines  developed  by  the Florida
Department of  Environmental  Regulation
(FDER). An important component of each
county  assessment  is  a survey  of
SQHWGs.  The  survey  data  were
collected  utilizing  questionnaires  sent
through the mail or completed  during on-
site interviews. The  FDER coordinated
the data collection  activities of  all
counties in order to maintain consistenc
in  the  survey effort. These data  wei
collected over the time period 1983-1981
however, the data collected from  eac
survey  respondent  represents wasl
produced  during one year of  operatic
(i.e., annual data). The survey data wei
placed  in a  computer  file and  mad
available to us for analysis.

Results  and  Discussion
  Table 1  shows the methods used 1
manage SQG hazardous waste in Florid
Fourteen  specific waste-managemei
methods  were grouped  into seve
general waste-management categories
The management method most commoi
ly   used  was  "Recycling"  whic
processed approximately 42,000 metri
tons annually or 36 percent of the tot,
SQG hazardous waste  produced. Th
second management  method  mo;
commonly used was  "Sent to Sanitar
Landfills"  which accounted for approx
mately 27,000 metric tons annually or 2
percent of the total SQG hazardous wast
produced.  The third management metho
most  commonly used  was "Othe
Table 1.    Waste-Management methods Used for SQG Hazardous Waste in Florida


      Waste Management Category
                 Annual Amount of
                Waste (metric tons)     Percent of Category
                 Percent of Total
  (1) Recycling
         Sub-total:

  (2) Sent to Sanitary Landfills
      Taken by Hauler                     25,705.1
      Taken by Generator                   7,069.6
         Sub-total:

  (3) Other Methods
         Sub-total:

  (4) Treatment
      Filtration                            4,348.7
      Neutralization                        3,842.5
      Incineration                         1,131.9
      Burned or Blended for Fuel            1,515.2
         Sub-total'

  (5) Discharged to Public Sewers
         Sub-total:

  (6) Disposed on Property
      Buried on Property                   2,338.7
      Discharged to Septic Tanks            1,837.2
      Disposed in Pit, Pond, or Lagoon        1,266.8
      Injected into Wells                     331.0
         Sub-total:

  (7) Sent to Permitted Facilities"
         Sub-total:
                   41,562.3




                   26,774.7


                   16,815.3
                   10,838.3


                   10,403.5
                    5,773.7
                    4,874.9
 100.0
 96.0
  ±0
 100.0
 100.0
 40.1
 35.5
 10.4
 14.0
 100.0
 100.0
                                          40.5
                                          31.8
                                          21.9
                                           5.7
                                         100.0
 100.0
35.5
22.9
                      14.4
 9.3


 8.9
 4.9


 4.2
                 Total:
                  117,042.7
                                                                                                       10.0
"Off-site commercial facilities permitted to handle hazardous waste under the RCRA.

-------
Methods"  which  accounted  for
approximately 17,000 metric  tons
annually or 15 percent of the total SQG
hazardous waste  produced.  "Other
Methods" was an option included on the
survey  form; howev.er,  the  survey
respondents were  not  asked  to identify
what  specific management  practices
were actually employed when  the "Other
Methods" category was used.
  Approximately 11,000 metric tons or 9
percent of the total SQG hazardous waste
produced  annually was managed by
"Treatment"  (Table 1).  Approximately
10,000 metric tons or  9  percent of the
total SQG  hazardous  waste produced
annually, was "Discharged  to  Public
Sewers." In addition, approximately 6,000
metric tons or 5 percent of the total SQG
hazardous waste generated  annually was
"Disposed on Property" of the SQHWGs.
Off-site commercial facilities permitted  to
manage hazardous waste under the
RCRA received  approximately 5,000
metric tons or 4  percent  of the SQG
hazardous waste generated annually.
  "Recycling," "Treatment," and "Sent
to Permitted  Facilities" represent SQG
hazardous-waste-management methods
that minimize the  potential  to adversely
impact  human   health  and  the
environment. "Sent to Sanitary Landfills,"
"Other Methods,"  "Discharged to Public
Sewers," and "Disposed on  Property"
represent SQG   hazardous-waste-
management methods that have a greater
potential to adversely impact human
health and  the environment.  Therefore,
from  Table  1, it  can be seen  that
approximately 49  percent or  57,000
metric tons of the SQG hazardous waste
produced  annually is managed in an
acceptable manner while 51 percent or
60,000 metric tons is managed in a less
acceptable manner.
  Table 2 shows the types and annual
amounts  of  SQG  hazardous  waste
produced  in  Florida and  the waste-
management methods used to  manage
these wastes. The waste type  "Other"
includes hazardous waste not reported as
one of the other 25 types included on the
survey form.  Survey  respondents were
not asked to identify the  specific types of
hazardous waste  that were actually
generated when  the  "Other" waste  type
was indicated.
  The largest quantity of SQG hazardous
waste  produced  was  "Waste  Oils,
Lubricants"  which accounted for 35
percent or 41,000 metric tons of the SQG
hazardous waste  produced annually.
"Lead-Acid Batteries" accounted for 14
percent or 17,000 metric tons of the SQG
hazardous waste  produced annually.
"Spent Solvents" accounted for 10
percent or 12,000 metric tons of the SQG
hazardous waste  produced annually.
Significant amounts of "Acidic or Alkaline
Wastes," "Rinses  with  Heavy Metals,"
"Sludges  with   Heavy  Metals,"
"Photographic Wastes",  "Other", "Spent
Plating Wastes,"  "Dust  with  Heavy
Metals,"  "Ignitable Paint Waste,"  and
Ignitable Wastes" were produced. Lesser
amounts of "Waste Ammonia," "Washing
Solutions,"   "Empty   Pesticide
Containers,"  "Other Pesticide Solutions,"
"Paint Waste with  Heavy Metals,"
"Waste Ink," "Cyanide Wastes." "Solvent
Still  Bottoms," "Waste  Pesticides,"
"Waste Formaldehyde," "Dry Cleaning
Filters,"  "Wood Preservatives," "Waste
Explosives,"  and "Spent Solutions from
Dipping" were produced.
  Data is presented in the report on the
quantities of  SQG  hazardous  waste
produced by industry (SIC code) and the
seven waste-management  categories
shown in Table 1.

Conclusions
  A  significant amount of  hazardous
waste  is  produced  by  SQHWGs  in
Florida. Approximately half of this waste
is  managed  by methods  (recycling,
treatment, and disposal  in  permitted
hazardous-waste-management  facilities)
that minimize the potential to  adversely
impact human health and the  environ-
ment. Of particular  concern is the large
quantity  of  SQG  hazardous  waste
disposed of  m sanitary  landfills and
discharged to public sewers, since these
facilities are not typically designed  to
handle hazardous waste.
  The waste  types, that represent the
greatest quantities  of hazardous  waste
produced by  SQHWGs in  Florida, are
waste oils  and  lubricants,  lead-acid
batteries, spent solvents, and  acidic  or
alkaline wastes. Even though  waste oils
are  not  presently  regulated  as  a
hazardous waste under  the RCRA, they
were included in these data because of
the potential adverse impacts of these
wastes  on  human  health  and the
environment.
  There  are potential  environmental and
human-health  problems associated with
the management  of SQG  hazardous
waste in Florida as well as throughout the
U.S.A.

-------







c
to
lagement C
1 *.
? £
k a
s a
* 1
$ §
& 9
"• s
1 5
s fi
s I
1*
4}
tf

S 9-
&£
3
V)
to
*
I
^
£
(D
£

k-
(D
Q
w
iC
T3
1
&•
1

O>
C
1
1
a
(0
I
I

£

§
O
S?

1
1
(
£
•iw
0
i
S?

o
1
j
s?

o
£
Amoun
v°

Amoun
#
0
I
S
w
CD
 O O »- O IO O 00 O O O O <- f-
O »- Oi T- »- O) "• T- >- i- IO CO CO <- r- O T- »- »-<»»- T- »- Y- O O
Q 10 oo N. o CM is. rv. oo »- oo oo t CM 10 >- ^(ococoi^ cooocot-. r-
(ocipi  10 Ki-n vc\i vv
lOO^- N- 10 ^ W-- 0) O OOOO) O O OOOOO O^-Of- O

COKOQ f^ CO O> a>>* t- O OCOK^- CD CO rxCOCNj^J-OO COi*-r-»^ OO
OiOK ^ rh CNJ Nlc\i t- O) i-CNif^CN C\i »- C3>~coioco c\jcniovv
N-T*c»c<3in v
C^ON-100)i->~ T-V »
CM c\j co
IOCOO O N O ON ^t O "-O1OO O O OOOOO OOOO »-
O>CMOO 00 O) T- i-Tf r>- i- T->-03i- >~ >- ^^^,~^ _^^^ o
lOtt O lO^h T-r-CO *
CO i-~ W T-" W
>~1-O t-  TJ- CMIO'-'- <~ »- »- IO •-
CO T-- « W T--
CMCOCM N IO 0) OO) O N OlloOO — O CMOOOO OOOO O
1O<~<- 00 CO Th >-IO »- CO i~CM>-i~ >~ i~ ^r-i-r-<~ ^.,-^r- T-
•t^r- V VV V VVVVVVVVV
OKCO >» 10 oo KCO o> 10 cooicoo CM o oiocot'io locoej)"- CM
§O*- 10 c\i 06 CM'CXJ oi cd to^^Th o 10 oiio'io'ioo oi^cM'oi ci
OO CO CM "- ION. t O> OlO N O) CM <-CMCMCOTh i~OO
>-T-OC3)O>COCMIO O)IOCO CM COt-<~ i-r-
csf co fo <~ ~
N-COO> eg i^ o ~CM o oo '-ooo o o ooooo i-ooo "-

O)»-K 10 o O) 0010 oo t COKCDCO oo ^ tr-cMOco T-^COO >-
T^IO'CO ** 06 t cMt o CM tt-ocri is! ^ CMCJIS!CO»- oco'cbo o
CMtr- CO 00 IO fOO t- IO KTJ.1-CO N CO tr-COCO V *-CM V
ocMior^cocMTj-Tj- Kt T-T- t-»- " *
-" o •» >-"
CM <~
COCM^J- IO IO <~ N.N O O> OOCOOO O O OOOOO OOOO O
lOtO 00 CO IO tCM CM »- ^^^r. ,~ ^ ^^^__ j-^T,^ ^.
cr>T-T- VVVVVVVVVVVVVV
OQCOIO >- >- <~ o>t o 10 OOOON.CO oo CM CMOCMO>CO COCOON i-
oitoi co »- oi ^t co N NlcMcbio co ivl sii^^^oi N'CMCO'IO o
CMNCM co N N T-CM i~ oo T-O>COIO t CNJ CM>~OO>CM CDCQCOIO T-
CT>COT- o> to a> m S>ssu3 O a. soc/jss QSSW
o
»-
O)
X
oo
t"
p

IV.
c
N.
10"
2
10
8
t
c5
g
T—
co
%
00
cS
§
T—
CO
10
00
co"
g
N
Tl-
N.
N.
co"
CM
§
r*
CO
a
iq
T-T
Th
g
^~
N
CM
5
N."
r-
K>

















it category
®
£
O)
CD
waste-mar
!>•£
{I
f »
"Percent of total SOG hazardous
""Percent of SOG hazardous wast

-------

-------
R. C. Herndon, J. E. Moerlins, and E.  B. Jones are with Florida State University,
   Tallahassee, FL 32306; the EPA authors, V. W. Lambou (also the EPA Project
   Officer, see below), is with the Environmental Monitoring  Systems Laboratory,
   Las Vegas, NV  89193-3478;  and J. D. Koutsandreas  is   with  USEPA  in
   Washington, DC 20460.
The complete report, entitled "Production  and Management of Small-quantity-
   Generator  Hazardous-Waste in Florida," (Order No. PB 89-129 0921 AS;  Cost:
   $13.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
        National Technical Information  Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
        U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
        Las Vegas, NV 89193-3478
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S4-88/038
          0000329   PS
                                          AGENCT

-------