3EFK
                               United States
                               Environmental Protection
                               Agency
                                                  I
                               Industrial Environmental Research
                               Laboratory
                               Cincinnati OH 45268
                               Research and Development
                               EPA-600/S7-81-131  Oct. 1981
Project Summary
                               Field Studies on  Paraho
                               Retorted  Oil Shale Lysimeters:
                               Leachate, Vegetation, Moisture,
                               Salinity,  and  Runoff,
                               1977-1980

                               M. K. Kilkelly, H. P. Harbert, III, and W. A. Berg
                                A disposal scheme for Paraho
                               retorted shale utilizing lysimeters to
                               simulate a low-elevation (dry site) and
                               a high-elevation (moist site) was
                               constructed. The study site was
                               located in western Colorado at the
                               Department  of Energy oil shale re-
                               search facility at Anvil Points. The
                               lysimeters were constructed in 1976
                               and filled with retorted shale in 1977.
                               Objectives  of the study were  to
                               investigate 1) vegetative stabilization
                               of Paraho retorted shale, as affected
                               by leaching and soil cover treatments;
                               and 2) moisture and soluble salt
                               movement through the  soil/shale
                               profile.
                                After intensive management and
                               four growing seasons, only a sparse
                               (2% to 3%) cover of perennial vegeta-
                               tion resulted on the Paraho retorted
                               shale. In contrast, good to excellent
                               cover was established and maintained
                               on  the soil control and soil-covered
                               retorted shale treatments.
                                Initial leaching and irrigation for
                               plant establishment produced perco-
                               late from drains below the compacted
                               shale zone. The percolate from the
                               Paraho retorted shale treatment mea-
                               sured a maximum electrical conduc-
                               tivity (EC) of 35 mmhos/cm and pH of
                               11.4. The soil control  produced
                               percolate with a maximum EC of 8.5
                               mmhos/cm and a pH of 8.3. Each
                               spring the high-elevation lysimeter
                               received supplemental irrigation to
                               simulate a zone of higher precipitation.
                               Percolate produced from these irriga-
                               tions exhibited a general overall
                               reduction in both EC (33 to  11.4
                               mmhos/cm) and pH (11.4 to 8.6) by
                               1980 on  the  Paraho  retorted  shale
                               treatment.  The low-elevation lysim-
                               eters did not receive additional spring
                               irrigations and no percolate was
                               produced  from the unleached treat-
                               ments. When the constructed lysim-
                               eters were filled with freshly retorted
                               shale a high temperature (60°C) was
                               maintained at a 1 -m depth for 30 days.
                               Prolonged, elevated temperatures of
                               retorted shale disposal piles could
                               significantly affect both the amount
                               and composition of vegetative cover.
                                This report deals most specifically
                               with the collection, measurement.
                               and interpretation of data from 1978
                               through 1980. A more detailed de-
                               scription of all  measurements and
                               analyses for 1976-1977 was reported
                               in Harbert eta). (1979).
                                This Project Summary was devel-
                               oped by EPA's Industrial Environmen-
                               tal Research Laboratory, Cincinnati,
                               OH,  to announce key findings of the
                               research project that  is fully docu-
                               mented in a separate report of the
                               same title (see Project Report ordering
                               information at back).

-------
Introduction
  In recent years, the need to develop
new energy resources within the United
States has become increasingly impor-
tant. In  1973,  the U.S. Department of
Interior  estimated that the western oil
shale reserves, consisting  of over
64,750 square kilometers in Colorado,
Wyoming, and Utah, contained over 9.5
x 1013 I  (600 billion barrels) of recover-
able crude oil. These  previously  un-
developed areas, used largely as range
and wildlife habitats, will be subject to
vast land disturbances with the devel-
opment  of an oil shale industry.
  Various  waste  products  will be
generated by shale processing methods
making  it necessary to develop control
technology in order to limit the environ-
mental impact. One of the major envi-
ronmental problems associated with oil
shale development is the disposal of the
massive amounts  of waste material
produced.  The U.S. Department of
Interior (1973)  estimated that a mature
oil shale industry of 1.6 x1081 of oil/day
(one million barrels  oil/day) would
generate approximately  20,000  ha-
m/year  of waste material  with surface
retorting methods. Part of this waste
might be returned to mined areas, but a
large proportion would require surface
disposal. Not only the large volume, but
also the chemical and physical charac-
teristics of the  waste  will create
challenges for the development of
control technology.
  Thus, the following study was initiated
to evaluate a variety of intensive man-
agement techniques and  practices for
the disposal of processed oil shale. A
model was designed to simulate  the
disposal of Paraho  retorted shale
(direct-heated)  at both a low-elevation
(dry  site) and  a  high-elevation (moist
site).  Lysimeters were  constructed to
measure both the quality and quantity of
percolate which might result from a
processed shale disposal pile. Various
treatments  such as leaching  and  soil
cover were used  to  investigate  the
establishment  of vegetative  cover on
the Paraho retorted shale.

Methods  and Materials
  In 1976, a series of concrete lysim-
eters were constructed to aid in model-
ing a disposal scheme  for Paraho
retorted  (direct-heated) oil shale. The
lysimeters were designed to simulate a
canyon  fill disposal  site  having  the
following features:
  1. The back  face of  the canyon fill
     gently sloped (2% to 5%) upstream.
  2. The front face of the dam steeply
     sloped (25% to 50%) downstream.
  3. The body of the disposal pile highly
     compacted.
  4. The exposed surface of  either
     uncompacted retorted shale or
     soil-covered  retorted  shale  of  a
     sufficient depth to provide  ade-
     quate plant rooting and moisture
     storage.
  A study site was selected at the U.S.
Department of Energy, Anvil  Points
Research Facility in western Colorado.
The study site, on public land managed
by the Bureau  of Land Management,
was characteristic of a semi-arid, low-
elevation disposal site, with an elevation
of 1737 m,  and an average annual
precipitation of 28 cm.
  Two identical sets of lysimeters were
constructed  at this site. One set was
used to simulate the natural  low-
elevation site, while the other was to
simulate a high-elevation disposal site.
Because of proximity to water, electricity,
retorted shale,  and  construction  sup-
plies, both sets of lysimeters were built
at the  low-elevation site. Sprinkler
irrigations simulated the increased
precipitation  associated with a high-
elevation site.
  The following replicated treatments
were tested with each lysimeter set on
both a 2%, north-aspect slope, and 25%,
south-aspect slope:
  1. Paraho retorted shale, leached.
  2. 20  cm  soil  cover over Paraho
     shale, leached.
  3. 40  cm  soil  cover over Paraho
     shale, unleached.
  4. 60  cm  soil  cover over Paraho
     shale, unleached.
  5. 80  cm  soil  cover over Paraho
     shale, unleached.
  6. Soil control, unleached.
  Each of the treatments, except the soil
control, contained 90 cm of compacted
Paraho retorted shale, covered  with
uncompacted shale,  and various
amounts of  soil cover (for some treat-
ments) to equal a total profile depth of
240 cm. Drains  were  built into the
lysimeters at both the interface of the
compacted and uncompacted zones and
beneath the compacted  zones.
  During the filling operation, tempera-
ture  measurements of the retorted
shale were made with a thermocouple
probe. A series of thermocouples were
later used to measure surface tempera-
tures throughout the 1977 and 1978
growing season.
  The lysimeters were instrumented
with tensiometers, piezometers, neutron
probe access tubes, and salinity sensors
to monitor the water and salt movement
through  the  uncompacted  zones.
Tensiometers were installed at 15, 30,
60, 90, 120,  and 150 cm depths to
measure soil and shale matric potential
for  1977.  The tensiometer data  were
used by other  researchers for a hydro-
logical modeling study,  and are not
included in this report (Chandler, 1979).
Piezometers were installed to a depth of
150 cm (the interface of the compacted
and uncompacted zone) and read during
the 1977 season. Neutron probe access
tubes were also set to a depth of 150 cm.
Monthly readings of soil  moisture by
volume were taken during each growing
season. Salinity sensors were placed at
depths of 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150
cm. Because of erratic readings, the use
of the sensors was discontinued in
1978.
  The subsurface drain system within
each treatment area  was fitted with a
plastic container for collecting leachate,
an electric sump pump, and a totalizing
flow meter to measure both the rate and
volume of  leachate from the lower
drain.  Any  percolate  from the upper
drain, in  the interface  area, was
collected in a plastic can.
  A surface  runoff collection system for
each treatment plot consisted of a metal
gutter, pipe, and a culvert with a plastic !
container. The system was completed in
1977 and used to collect snowmelt
runoff and summer storm runoff of later
seasons.
  Details on the leaching, fertilization,
and seeding of the  treatments, are
provided in the main report. Vegetative
analysis for 1977 was  done  by the
quadrat method to determine vegetative
cover.  For vegetative measurements
1978-1980  the line-transect method
was used.  Vegetative cover as well as
species composition was determined.
  In September of 1977, core samples
were taken from various treatments in
20-cm increments to a depth of 160 cm.
These samples were analyzed by the
CSU Soil Testing Laboratory for common
cations and  anions, pH, and EC.  Core
samples were again taken in the fall of
1979 for EC  analysis.
  Ambient air temperature, precipita-
tion, and pan  evaporation have  been
monitored  since establishment of the
lysimeters.

Results and Discussion
  The SAR (Sodium Adsorption Ratio) is
a measure of  the ratio  of sodium to
calcium and magnesium of  soils or

-------
waters  and estimates  the  dispersion
potential posed by exchangeable sodium,
when  soluble  salts are leached. A
potential sodium dispersion problem
may exist when SAR values exceed 15.
The  SAR value of the Paraho retorted
shale suggested such a problem. Other
analyses indicated that the retorted
shale would require fertility amend-
ments for successful vegetative growth.
While plant-available phosphorus was
low for the retorted shale (as well as the
soil), potassium seemed adequate, but
nitrate-nitrogen was low.

Wet-Dry  Cycles
  After filling of the lysimeters was
completed,  a series of wetting and
drying cycles were used to reduce the
pH of the retorted shale. Although the
pH was successfully reduced from 11.4
to 9.2, the EC increased from 4 to 6.1.
The  increase in EC was probably due to
the greater solubility of Ca and Mg salts
at a lower pH. Apparently, the amount of
carbonate decomposition was minimal
with the Paraho direct retorting process,
and this allowed rapid recarbonation of
the  retorted  shale. The  pH  of  the
retorted shale would likely have  de-
creased with  the natural weathering
process.

Retorted Shale Temperature
  Temperatures of the retorted shale in
the uncompacted zone were monitored
with a  thermocouple probe following
the  filling of the lysimeters in  1977.
Although a sharp drop in the tempera-
ture of the shale (230 to 64-80°C)
occurred within 10 days after  place-
ment, an  additional  30 days was
required for the shale to drop  below
60°C at the 1-m recording depth. This
suggested that a droughty  site could
develop if freshly retorted shale was
covered with soil before cooling. A xeric
site  would significantly affect both the
amount and composition of vegetation
cover.

Vegetation
  The quadrat method was used for the
first  year of growth in 1977 to estimate
germination and establishment. The
line-intercept method was used in later
years  to provide  more quantitative
measurements. The Paraho retorted
shale treatments supported only a very
minimal (2% to 3%) perennial vegetative
cover (Table 1). Observations of the few
perennial species on  the Paraho shale
indicated severe stunting and physio-
logical stress. Caution must be advised
when comparisons of total vegetative
cover between the  Paraho retorted
shale and other treatments are made.
Values as high as 48% vegetative cover
on the Paraho retorted shale, 2%-slope,
north-aspect  of the high-elevation
lysimeters must be carefully scrutinized.
This  vegetative  cover was almost
completely composed of annual species
such as kochia. This  annual was at its
vegetative peak when measured and
with its extremely short-lived habit, left
the treatment  almost totally bare and
exposed by mid to late summer.
  After four  growing  seasons the
inability of shrubs (where seeded,  on
the low-elevation  lysimeters) to either
increase in number or size was observed
on  the soil-covered Paraho retorted
shale treatments.

Trace Elements in Vegetation
  In 1977 and 1978, plant samples
were collected from the lysimeter plots
for trace element analyses. Large
stands of alfalfa were present as a result
of seed introduced with the hay mulch,
so this species was sampled. Overall,
molybdenum  levels of plants from
Paraho retorted shales were judged to
be high (11.5 to 23.5 ppm Mo) (Kilkelly
and Lindsay,  1979).  This, combined
with low  to moderate copper levels,
could limit the  use of this vegetation for
animal forage.

Moisture
  In a semi-arid region where seasonal
precipitation seldom  exceeds evapo-
transpiration,  percolation and water
movement within a pile of retorted shale
should be limited, provided a satisfactory
vegetative cover  exists.  In this study,
seasonal precipitation over a four-year
period provided a  spring recharge of
approximately 20% moisture by volume
(to  depths  of  60  to 120  cm). Those
treatments with a good vegetative cover
were reduced to  approximately  10%
moisture by volume by fall. The moisture
extracted during the growing season by
vegetation resulted  in a  renewal  of
reservoir  capacity to contain yearly
precipitation, especially  spring snow-
melt. Without  satisfactory vegetative
cover, moisture within the profile could
be moved downward with  each yearly
recharge and pollution of ground water
could result.
  Each  year,  since  establishment,
irrigation of the high-elevation lysim-
eters produced  percolate from the lower
drain of most treatments. The purpose
of the extra irrigation was to simulate a
region of higher elevation where
seasonal  precipitation exceeded the
evapotranspiration of the native  plant
community. The collection and analysis
of percolate from these  treatments
could then be used for predicting the
potential for environmental pollution.
  The  Paraho retorted shale,  despite
leaching, continued to support far less
vegetative cover than other treatments,
thereby reducing the extraction of
surplus moisture in the profile. Moisture
recharge and depletion patterns between
other treatments were similar, with the
greatest amount of moisture used by the
dense  vegetative cover on  the soil
control.

Runoff
  The  first year that  runoff  samples
were collected from the newly estab-
lished lysimeters was 1978. The runoff
was  of low salinity hazard.
  Runoffs from  south slopes of both
high- and low-elevation lysimeters
were measured  and samples were
collected on March 8,  1979.  Recorded
runoff for south slopes was greater than
for north  slopes due to the fact that
snowmelt was slower on the north side
and the slope more gradual. Samples of
runoff collected on March 22 were sent
to the CSU Soil Testing Laboratory for
water quality analyses (Table  2). The
salinity hazard for all samples was low
to medium, while the sodium hazard
was  low.
  Spring snowmelt in 1980 resulted in
runoff  only from north slopes.  Field
observations indicated that the ground
on the north slopes was frozen with a
thin  covering of ice.  The south slope
ground was thawed, allowing moisture
to enter the soil or shale, resulting in
little runoff. The low sodium and salinity
hazard combined with the negligible
sediment  yield  suggested  that the
runoff  never actually came in  contact
with the  soil or shale surface, but
merely ran over the  layer of  ice. No
runoff from summer storms resulted.

Percolate
  In  1977, after some treatments were
leached, both high- and low-elevation
lysimeter studies were irrigated to aid
the  establishment of vegetation.  Only
the high-elevation lysimeter study
received additional irrigation in the
early spring of 1978 and 1979. These
differences were designed to study both
the quantity and quality of the percolate
resulting. In 1980, percolate  from the
high-elevation lysimeters resulted from

-------
Table 1 . Vegetative Cover by Species Composition for
Control, 1978-1980
Treatment
Paraho Retorted Shale
20 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
40 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
60 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
80 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
Soil Control
Treatment
Paraho Retorted Shale
20 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
40 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
60 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
80 cm Soil Cover/Paraho
Soil Control
Species Categories
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Species Categories
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial Grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other
Perennial grasses
Shrubs
Other

1978

19
2
29
59
2
57
5
47
7
40
16
86
14


1978

8
1
6
42
2
23
45
18
39
3
29
59
3
8
45
4
33
Paraho Retorted Shale, Soil-Covered Paraho Retorted Shale, and Soi
High-Elevation Lysimeter
2% Slope
North Aspect
1979

5
46
72
11
63
39
60
29
59
27
93
2

2% Slope
North Aspect
1979

1
24
18
2
80
28
69
22
3
62
48
2
24
51
6
29

1980

3
48
31
15
32
13
43
24
29
22
33
Low-Elevation

1980
o/
2
24
7
1
61
12
59
13
2
51
25
4
33
20
3
30

1978

14
26
60
8
49
4
44
5
39
10
73
19
Lysimeter

1978

2
5
15
26
3
39
41
2
19
47
12
45
2
11
61
15
8
25% Slope
South Aspect
1979

6
48
71
21
65
30
67
31
73
26
95
2

25% Slope
South Aspect
1979

3
27
31
38
20
61
16
79
22
57
52
18
14

1980

2
39
47
9
46
16
40
13
46
11
29
2
(

1980

3
19
23
48
17
2
47
12
43
13
1
43
22
10
20
- This species category was not observed on line-transects used for analyses of vegetation.




                                  4

-------
seasonal snowmelt alone; no supple-
mental irrigation was made. Only data
from  the lower drains,  below  the
compacted  zone, are discussed since
99% of the total volume of percolate was
collected from these drains.
  Total  cumulative volumes  for all
treatments  of both the high-elevation
lysimeter and  low-elevation  lysimeter
are shown in Table 3. Only the Paraho
retorted shale on the 25% slope of the
high-elevation  lysimeter produced  one
pore volume of leachate. Percolate
volumes from  other treatments were
generally limited. The objective of
supplying additional irrigation water, on
a yearly basis, to the  high-elevation
lysimeter was to evaluate the quantity
and quality  of percolate which might
result from a processed oil shale
disposal pile at an elevation where
seasonal precipitation exceeded evapo-
transpiration and resulted in percolate.
  After the initial leaching and irrigation
for  plant establishment (which resulted
in a minimal amount of percolate) no
further irrigation was applied to the low-
elevation lysimeters. In these treat-
ments,  the vegetation was able to
deplete the plant-available moisture in
the profiles of most treatments, allow-
ing a reservoir  for spring recharge.
Consequently,  a  significant amount of
percolate did not result  in later years.
  Because  of  the limited percolate
volume  from most treatments,  the EC
values  fluctuated considerably.  The
maximum EC was not always associated
with the initial percolate from a particular
lysimeter, nor were minimum EC values
associated  with  the final percolate
flowing  from  a  lysimeter.  Overall,
however, a general drop in EC values
was observed  for treatments through
which greater  amounts of water  had
passed,  such as the Paraho retorted
shale, 25%  slope, of the high-elevation
lysimeter. In 1977, maximum EC values
for  leachate from this treatment were
31.0  mmhos/cm, dropped to 15.1
mmhos/cm  by 1979, and returned to
23.9 mmhos/cm in 1980. Much greater
volumes of  water leached through the
lysimeters would be required in order to
stabilize  the chemical  composition of
the percolate.
  Laboratory analyses of the initial
percolate collected in 1977 are reported
in Table 4.  Analyses for EC,  pH, TDS,
and common cations and anions were
made in order to judge the quality of the
percolate.
  The percolate  collected from  the
lower drains of  the lysimeters had  a
Table 2.
Water Quality Analyses of Spring Snowmelt Runoff from the
High-Elevation and Low-Elevation Lysimeters, North-Aspect. 2% Slope,
March 22, 1979
                     High-Elevation
                                         Low-Elevation
20
cm Soil 40 cm Soil
Paraho

Runoff (cm)
pH
H6
0.22
6.9
EC (fjmhos/cm) 280
Na (meq/l)
Ca (meq/l)
Mg (meq/l)
K (meq/l)
C03 (meq/l)
HCO3 (meq/l)
N03 (meq/l)
S04 (meq/l)
Cl (meq/l)
SAR
Salinity Hazard
Sodium Hazard
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.2
0
1.3
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.7
low
low
Paraho
Paraho Retorted Shale
H10

0.17
7.1
620
2.1
1.0
1.0
0.5
0
2.2








O.02
2.6
1.8
2.1



low-med
low
Table 3. Total Percolate Volume from
Treatment
High Elevation
Paraho Spent Shale

20 cm Soil/Paraho

40 cm Soil/Paraho

60 cm Soil/Paraho

80 cm Soil/Paraho

Soil Control

Low Elevation
Paraho Spent Shale

20 cm Soil/Paraho

40 cm Soil/Paraho

60 cm Soil/Paraho

80 cm Soil/Paraho

Soil Control

Slope

2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%

2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%
2%
25%
1977


9,513.8
34,110.4
2,179.0
24,636.6
447.4
3,860.7
0
1,308.9
0
1,771.8
219.0
5,649.1

1,042.6
706.8
771.4
4,638.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

L4
0.16
7.3
280
0.6
0.6
1.8
0.2
0
1.6
0.06
1.3
0.5
0.6
low
low
the Lysimeter Study,
1978


4, 149. 1
8,527.6
462.5
8,658.2
1,092.7
5.969.0
107.1
2.879.6,
946.3
4,087.0
1,105.2
5.216.5

5.0
0
20.0
180.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1979
.

903.1
7.171.8
223.7
5,969.3
817.6
5,059.0
0
2,487.9
199.1
3.384.2
12.0
4.0

15.0
0
5.0
60.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80 cm Soil/
Paraho
L18
0.12
7.7
500
2.2
1.0
1.0
0.7
0
2.1
0.15
1.6
1.5
2.2
low
low
L20
0.26
7.4
390
1.3
1.0
0.6
0.3
0
2.1
0.03
1.0
1.0
1.4
low
low
1977-1980
1980


0
318.7
0
91.2
0
22.7
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total


14,566.0
50.128.5
2,865.2
39,355.3
7,357.7
14,911.4
107.1
6,676.4
1,145.4
9.243.0
1,336.2
10,869.6

1,062.6
706.8
796.4
4,878.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

-------
Table 4.
Laboratory Analyses  of the Initial Percolate from the High-Elevation
Lysimeter, 1977
               Percolate from Retorted Shale
                                        Percolate from Soil
                 6/8/77  6/17/77   9/2/77   8/1/77  8/23/77  8/31/77
EC, ^mhos/cm
pH
TDS, ppm
SAP
Cations, meq/l
Ca
Mg
Na
K
An ions, meq/l
Cl
S04
12.983
6.3
14,328
52.8

16.4
9.0
148.8
11.2

30.6
157.7
27,222
7.1
31,984
116.8

23.0
5.1
429.3
45.1

28.2
449.6
10,500
7.0
*
30.0

17.4
1.5
90.0
11.3

4.8
119.0
4600
7.5
*
10.8

8.8
8.5
31.5
2.9

11.5
35.6
5100
8.2
*
3.7

6.9
21.4
36.1
1.1

17.1
37.5
5100
8.3
*
9.7

5.4
19.8
34.0
1.0

15.3
36.2
 *Not determined.


high soluble salt content from passing
through 2.4 m of retorted shale. It can be
predicted from these values that water
moving through a retorted shale  pile,
several hundred meters thick, could be
extremely saline.
  Laboratory analyses also indicated
that the SAR of the percolate was high.
This suggested that the percolate could
create soil  dispersion problems in
irrigated  agriculture.  The soil control
produced percolate  with a moderate
SAR, increasing  the  possibility  of a
sodium dispersion problem in such soils
if contaminated with retorted shale
percolate.

Water Balance
  Water  balance calculations were
made for all treatments of both lysim-
eters for the 1977 season (Harbert et al.,
1979). An attempt was made to account
for the total volume of water applied to
each treatment by estimating various
inputs and losses. Inputs of moisture
were fairly well defined and limited,
such as  precipitation and irrigation.
Losses were more difficult to measure
and estimate,  such  as percolation,
moisture storage in the profile,  and
evapotranspiration.
  For all of  the  leached  treatments,
amounts of water applied could not be
accounted for by a summation of losses
as they were measured or estimated. A
water balance for the unleached treat-
ments resulted  in just the opposite, in
that water losses were calculated  to be
greater than water inputs. The moisture
measurements for the soil control  most
nearly balanced inputs and losses.
                             Other researchers have addressed the
                             problem of water balances for the
                             lysimeter study (Chandler, 1979).

                             Conclusions

                             Chemical and Physical
                             Characteristics of Paraho
                             Retorted Shale
                             1. After four wetting-and-drying cycles,
                               the  pH of Paraho retorted shale
                               surface samples was reduced from
                               11.2 to 9.0.
                             2. After leaching,  the Paraho retorted
                               shale soluble salt  content was
                               reduced from 7.1 mmhos/cm to 3-4
                               mmhos/cm.
                             3. The unleached treatments averaged
                               approximately 10 mmhos/cm through-
                               out the  retorted  shale profile,  al-
                               though, there was no indication of
                               upward migration of soluble salts by
                               1979.
                             4. Laboratory  analyses  of 1977 core
                               samples suggested that imbalances
                               of calcium, magnesium, and sodium
                               might inhibit plant growth  on the
                               Paraho retorted shale.
                             5. Surface temperatures reach 80°C on
                               south slopes of the black-colored
                               Paraho retorted shale. This might be
                               lethal to seedlings, while increasing
                               surface evaporation.

                             Vegetation
                             1. After four growing seasons, peren-
                               nial vegetation on the Paraho reported
                               shale remained minimal (2% to 3%
                               cover).
                             2. A good to excellent vegetative cover
                               was established and maintained on
   the  soil control and soil-covered,
   retorted  shale treatments, with
   western wheatgrass as the predomi-
   nant species.
3. Differences between varying amounts
   of soil cover, with respect to vegeta-
   tive  cover, were insignificant.
4. Shrubs seeded on the low-elevation
   lysimeters were unable  to  signifi-
   cantly increase in either number or
   size  over four growing  seasons,
   indicating limited root tolerance for
   the Paraho retorted shale.

Percolate
1. Ninety-nine percent of the total
   percolate collected from  all treat-
   ments  was from the lower drain,
   under the compacted zone.
2. Core samples taken later suggested
   that  moisture  had  moved through
   both the uncompacted  and com-
   pacted profile.
3. Abrupt textural changes  from  the
   fine-textured soil to the coarse-
   textured Paraho retorted  shale
   below, delayed  the  uniform down-
   ward movement of moisture through
   the  profile.
4. Irrigation (except for 1980) of the
   high-elevation lysimeters resulted in
   percolate each spring.
5. Only the treatments which had been
   leached (Paraho retorted shale and
   20-cm soil/Paraho retorted shale) of
   the low-elevation lysimeters pro-
   duced percolate.
6. On unleached treatments of the low-
   elevation lysimeters moisture did not
   move below 105 cm.

Water Quality
1. The maximum EC of percolate from
   the  Paraho retorted shale was 35
   mmhos/cm.
2. Overall, a decrease in percolate EC
   after four years was observed, how-
   ever, EC values fluctuated consider-
   ably.
3. If water moves through the  Paraho
   retorted shale a high pollution poten-
   tial  exists, with respect to EC and
   SAR values measured.
4. Greater total pore  volumes must
   pass through the lysimeters before
   the  chemical  composition  of the
   percolate stabilizes.

Disposal Pile Temperatures
1. The freshly retorted shale used in
   this study maintained 60°C temper-
   atures for 30 days.
2. Prolonged, elevated temperatures
   could significantly affect both  the

-------
   amount and composition of vegeta-
   tive cover on disposal piles.

Recommendations
1. Because of the unsuitability of the
   Paraho retorted shale as a  direct
   plant growth  media, soil cover is
   recommended for successful estab-
   lishment of vegetation on the retorted
   shale.
2. Poor establishment  and growth of
   the fourwing saltbush suggested
   limited root penetration into the
   Paraho retorted shale. Additional
   studies are needed to evaluate root
   growth in retorted  shale.
3. Efforts  should be  made to prevent
   movement of water through the
   retorted shale as leach water poses a
   pollution  potential  due to  high
   soluble salt content.
4. Research is needed to insure that the
   compacted  shale  can be made
   impervious since,  in this  study,
   moisture moved  through Paraho
   retorted shale compacted to a density
   of 1.5 to 1.6 g/cm3.
5. Elevated temperatures maintained
   in  the retorted shale disposal pile
   might adversely affect the establish-
   ment of vegetation. Further investi-
   gation  under  commercial disposal
   pile conditions is recommended.
6. The present fluctuations in chemical
   composition of  leachate from the
   lysimeters require that additional
   pore volumes of water are needed to
   evaluate leachate quality.

References
1. Harbert H.P., III, W.A. Berg, and D.B.
   McWhorter.  1979.  Lysimeter dis-
   posal of Paraho retorted oil shale.
   EPA-600/7-79-188,  US EPA, Indus-
   trial Environmental Research Labo-
   ratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268.
2. Chandler,  R.L.  1979. Water and
   chemical transport in layered porous
   media. Ph.D.  Dissertation,  Fall,
   Colorado State Univerisity, Ft. Collins,
   Colorado.
3. Kilkelly, M.K., and  W.L  Lindsay.
   1979. Trace elements in plants on
   processed oil shale, pp. 191-253. In
   Trace Elements in Oil Shale, W. R.
   Chapell (ed) 1976-1979 PR, US DOE
   Contract No. EY-76-S-02-4017.
M. K. Kilkelly,  H. P. Harbert, III, and W. A. Berg are with the Department of
  Agronomy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
E. R. Bates is the EPA Project Officer (see below}.
The  complete report, entitled "Field Studies on Paraho Retorted Oil Shale
  Lysimeters: Leachate, Vegetation, Moisture,  Salinity, and Runoff, 1977-
  1980," (Order No. PB 81-234 742;  Cost: $9.50, subject to change) will be
  available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

RETURN  POSTAGE GUARANTEED
                                                                                                   Third-Class
                                                                                                   Bulk Rate
          IERL0130766
                       REGION  V
                  EPA
                        ,
                        L  60604
                                                                                  •frU.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1981--559-092-3:

-------