United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Air and Energy Engineering Researc
Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-85/002  Mar. 1985
&EPA         Project Summary

                   Particulate Emissions  and
                   Control  in Fluidized-Bed
                   Combustion:  Modeling  and
                   Parametric Performance

                   A. Y. Ranadive, R. A. Newby, and D. F. Ciliberti
                     A model was developed to describe
                   the physical characteristics of the par-
                   ticulates emitted from fluidized-bed
                   combustion (FBC) systems and to eval-
                   uate data on FBC particulate control
                   systems. The model, which describes
                   the particulate emissions profile from
                   FBC, considers the attrition of the bed
                   material and the recycling of the elu-
                   triated fines in addition to other FBC
                   phenomena.  For a given combustor
                   design and set of operating conditions,
                   the particle profile program projects the
                   mass  rate and size distribution of the
                   solids in the bed draw-off and carry-
                   over streams, as well as those emitted
                   from particle removal devices of any
                   given configuration.
                     Examples of particulate emission and
                   control are given for both atmospheric-
                   pressure and pressurized FBC systems.
                   The effect of calcium-to-sulfur  ratio,
                   rate of sorbent attrition, superficial gas
                   velocity, and recycle cyclone efficiency
                   was examined by using the model. A
                   manual for the particle profiles program
                   comprising a quick-reference user's
                   section, as well as  a more detailed
                   descriptive section, is provided in the
                   full report.
                     This Project Summary was developed
                   by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering
                   Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
                   Park, NC, to announce key findings of
                   the research project that is fully docu-
                   mented in a separate report of the same
                   title (see Project Report ordering infor-
                   mation at back).
Introduction
  The fluidized-bed combustion (FBC) of
coal offers the potential for a more
thermally efficient, environmentally supe-
rior, and more economical way to use coal
resources to generate electric power and
to produce industrial steam than do
conventional methods of coal utilization.
  Many different  FBC concepts have
been proposed having significantly dif-
ferent  emission behavior and control
requirements. FBC concepts can be used
for atmospheric (AFBC) or pressurized
(PFBC) operation and for industrial or
utility applications.
  The conventional FBC boiler concept
integrates  coal combustion, sulfur con-
trol, and temperature control in a single
component. In both AFBC and PFBC
boilers, coal and sulfur sorbent (limestone
or dolomite) are fed into a FB reactor,
where  the combustion of coal occurs,
accompanied by the release of heat, ash,
and sulfur as sulfur oxides (SOX). The
sorbent in the bed reacts with the sulfur
to form a solid product, thereby reducing
the release of the sulfur pollutant to the
atmosphere. Most of the ash, together
with some sorbent and char, is carried
overhead and out of the reactor with the
off-gas. The bulk  of these particulate
emissions may be captured in a cyclone
and recycled to the bed to achieve higher
carbon and sorbent utilization. Heat is
extracted from the  reactor by immersing
the heat transfer surface in the  bed to
generate steam. For industrial applica-
tions the steam so generated finds use as

-------
process heat or as process feedstock. For
utility applications the steam is expanded
through a steam turbine for power genera-
tion. Additionally, in the case of PFBC for
utility applications, the hot pressurized
gas from the reactor is cleaned of partic-
ulate matter bypassing it through a train
of particle  removal devices and  then
expanding it through a gas turbine for
power generation. Particle emissions
from PFBC processes utilizing gas turbine
expanders for  power  generation  must
therefore be controlled at levels that are
acceptable for reliable turbine operation.
Paniculate control is,  therefore, a vital
aspect of FBC technology.
Results and Recommendations
  The particulate control problem  as  it
relates to FBC is threefold: (1) the particle
emission characteristics of FB combus-
tors need to be determined; (2) acceptable
levels of particle loadings and size distri-
butions, from  the standpoints  both of
environmental constraints and, for PFBC,
of the requirements for reliable  gas
turbine operation, need to be established;
and (3) an appropriate train of particulate
control devices needs to be identified for
reducing the particle emissions to ac-
ceptable levels.
  The present  work addresses  two of
these areas of concern. A particle profile
model, incorporating the FB combustor
and particulate control subsystems, has
been developed that permits rational and
consistent projections of solid sizes and
loadings from  the FB combustor  and
throughout the FBC  system. The model
considers particle attrition and the recy-
cling  of elutriated fines, in addition to
other FBC  phenomena, and is  able to
simulate gas cleaning equipment of any
desired configuration.
  The particle profile model is illustrated
by providing some initial perspective on
particle emission and control for AFBC
and PFBC systems. The results of para-
metric studies with respect to calcium-to-
sulfur (Ca/S) ratio, rate of sorbent attrition,
superficial gas velocity, and recycle cy-
clone efficiency are described.
  The particle profile model developed  is
highly useful for  evaluating FBC design
and  operating conditions that relate to
particulate emissions from the combus-
tor. Particle control devices and systems
integrated with  FB combustors  can be
assessed for their ability to satify  envi-
ronmental standards and/or gas-turbine
protection requirements. Particle attrition
(sorbent and ash) represents the greatest
uncertainty in the model. This could be
clarified by:

• Further studies to develop increased
   understanding of attrition and elutria-
   tion.
• Comparison of model projections with
   available  plant data to  establish  its
   validity and to identify and characterize
   controlling phenomena.


The  application  of  the particle  profile
program to particle emission and  control
for AFBC and PFBC systems results in the
following conclusions:

• The final  particulate control device is
   of primary importance, since this filter
   stage determines  the particle size
   distribution and  loading released to
   the environment or presented to the
   turbine.
• FBC design and operating conditions
   (and  resulting Ca/S ratio) have little
   effect on the size distribution of emit-
   ted particles for the final-stage control
   devices examined here.
• The selection of coal, sorbent, and FBC
   design will significantly  affect the
   particle loading to the environment or
   to the turbine for a given final-stage
   device performance. The coal-ash par-
   ticle size distribution, the sorbent attri-
   tion  rate, and the attrited sorbent
   particle size distribution are important
   performance factors.
• The design of the FBC to minimize
   sorbent consumption (Ca/S) and par-
   ticle  attrition is  important for mini-
  mizing the quantity of particles emitted
  to the environment or turbine.
• The recycle  cyclone performance
  strongly  influences the rate of recy-
  cling solids. The use of a high-effi-
  ciency recycle cyclone results in high
  solid recycle rates, but does not affect
  the particulate emission from the final
  cleaning device. The relation between
  recycle rate and FBC combustion and
  sulfur  removal performance is not
  generally predictable. To minimize
  both the recycled solids handling re-
  quirement and the erosion of convec-
  tive heat transfer  surface above the
  bed, a medium-efficiency,  rather than
  a high-efficiency, recycle cyclone
  should be used.
• For AFBC, commercial,  final-stage
  particulate control devices (i.e., fabric
  filters and electrostatic precipitators)
  are available that will  perform satis-
  factorily to meet environmental stand-
  ards. Some technical problems remain
  to be dealt with for both fabric filters
  and electrostatic precipitators. Staged
  cyclones will be insufficient to  meet
  environmental standards except in
  cases of  unusual coals and sorbents.
• For PFBC, many technical and eco-
  nomic  considerations  can result ir
  either the environmental standards oi
  the turbine protection requirements
  being the most stringent and  control
  ling the selection  and design of  <
  particulate control system. Final-stag*
  particulate control devices are bein<
  developed for this  application, bu
  their performance and economic feas
  ibility are not yet established
   A. Y. Ranadive. R. A. Newby. andD. F. Ciliberti are with Westinghouse Research
     and Development Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15235.
   John O. Milliken is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "Particulate Emissions and Control in Fluidized-Bed
     Combustion: Modeling and Parametric Performance." (Order No. PB 85-152
     973/AS; Cost: $14.50, subject to change) will be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Royal Road
           Springfield, VA 22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
           Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

-------
United States                      Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection              Information
Agency                           Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty tor Private Use S300
                                       OCOC329   PS

                                       U  S  EKVIR PROTECTION  AGENCY
                                       CHICAGO

-------