Ui    States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-85/014  May 1985
Project Summary
Technical  and  Economic
Evaluation  of  Organic Acid
Addition to  a  Commercial
FGD System
Jack M. Burke
  This report summarizes the results of
 organic acid addition tests at a com-
 mercial FGD system. The tests were
 conducted at San Miguel Electric Co-
 operative's 410 MW lignite-fired Unit
 1, outside Jourdanton, TX. During the
 program, several organic acid mixtures
 were tested over a range of operating
 conditions to determine if the use of
 organic acids would allow San Miguel
 to reduce FGD system operating costs.
 Based on the test results, a cost analysis
 indicated that the use of organic acid
 addition at San Miguel will result in a
 first-year cost savings of over $600.000.
 In terms of cumulative net present
 worth, the estimated savings over a 15-
 year period wHI be $7.2 million in 1984
 dollars.
  This Project Summary was developed
 by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering
 Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
 Park, NC, to announce key findings of
 the research project that is fully docu-
 mented in a separate report of the same
 title (see Project Report ordering infor-
 mation at back).

 Introduction
  A  test  program was  conducted to
 evaluate  the technical and  economic
 aspects of organic acid addition to San
 Miguel Electric Cooperative's Unit 1 wet
 limestone FGD system. This program,
 sponsored by EPA's  Air and Energy
 Engineering Research Laboratory, marked
 the first time organic  acids have been
 used in an FGD system in an  attempt to
 reduce operating costs. As part of the
program, three different organic acids
were tested over a range of operating
conditions, and measurements were
made to permit changes in operating
costs to be quantified. The results of this
program have shown that a substantial
reduction in costs can be realized by San
Miguel through the continued use  of
organic acids in the FGD system. The
estimated first year cost savings for San
Miguel are $600,000.  Over a  15-year
period, this translates into a net present
worth of $7.2 million  in 1984 dollars.
Most of these savings are either directly
or indirectly attributable to a reduction in
limestone consumption by the San Miguel
FGD system.  As a  result  of the test
program at San Miguel, the utility has
installed a permanent organic acid addi-
tion system and has plans for continued
use of organic acids.

Background
  As part of an earlier economic study
sponsored by EPA, the San Miguel FGD
system was identified as a good candidate
for a program designed to reduce oper-
ating costs through the use of organic
acids. The  primary reason San Miguel
was so identified was  that  the system
was operating at a very high limestone
stoichiometry. Based on the limestone
stoichiometries reported by  San Miguel
and previous data on the effects of organic
acids in FGD systems, an initial analysis
showed that the cost savings which could
result from reduced limestone consump-
tion would more than offset costs associ-
ated with the use of organic acids. The

-------
initial study also showed the potential for
San Miguel to improve FGD system
operation and  reduce maintenance ex-
penditures  by operating  at low stoichi-
ometries (which should have been possi-
ble once organic acids were added to the
system). Because of the potential benefits
associated  with organic acid addition,
San Miguel agreed to participate in a test
program to evaluate the use of organic
acids in the Unit 1 FGD system.

Test Program
  The  test  program conducted  at San
Miguel included eight tests with organic
acids and  baseline measurements to
quantify the performance  of the FGD
system without organic acids present.
The three organic acids tested were:

• A mixture of dibasic acids supplied by
   DuPont  Petrochemicals  of Victoria,
   Texas. The major components of this
   mixture were adipic(15 wt%), succinic
   (25 wt%), and glutaric (60 wt%) acids.
• A mixture of dibasic and  monobasic
   acids supplied by Badische Corporation
   of Freeport, Texas. The major compo-
   nents of .this mixture were adipic (45
   wt%) and hydroxycaproic (35 wt%)
   acids.               >   ,
• An  organic acid stream  composed
   primarily (80 wt%) of dibasic maleic
   acid supplied by Badische Corporation.

  The results of thetests with these three
acid mixtures over a range of test condi-
tions permitted an economic analysis to
identify the most cost effective additive
and mode of operation for the San Miguel
FGD system.

Test Results
  The  major results of the  San Miguel
test program can best be summarized by a
cost comparison of the  three additives
tested. These results are shown in Table
1. This table presents estimated 15-year
net present worth of the cost savings for
each  additive tested.  The  costs  and
savings are calculated  for  actual  test
conditions and they represent annualiza-
tion of measurements made during in-
dividual tests.  For the two Badische
additives, the  costs represent the only
conditions  examined during the test
program.
  As shown in Table 1, the estimated cost
savings for each additive include costs for
the organic acid and capital charges for
the  organic acid addition  system. As
mentioned  earlier,  the  savings  shown
Table  1.   Fifteen-Year Cumulative Net Present Worth for the Three Additives Tested at San
          Miguel

                                    Estimated Savings (costs) in $ 1000s
Acid/ Buffer Capacity
Cost Component"
Capital Investment
Organic Acid
Limestone Reagent
Limestone Grinding
Sludge Disposal
Maintenance
Dewatering
Bypass Credit
Total
DuPont DBA/
600 ppm
(215)
(6093)
6939
1306
2523
752
353
1650
7215
EP-306/
460 ppm
1215)
(3395)
5949
1120
2163
__
303
914
6839
EP-501/
125 ppm
(215)
(5054)
4562
859
1659
—
232
914
2957
"All costs in mid-1984 dollars.
result primarily from reduced limestone
consumption. These savings include:

 • Reduced limestone reagent costs.
'• Reduced  costs for operation  of the
   limestone grinding circuit.
 • Reduced  costs, for  sludge disposal
.   since less limestone is present in the
   FGD waste.

 • Reduced  costs for operation  of the
   dewatering area of the FGD system for
   the same reason.

  These represent  the  major savings.
Sayings also resulted from San Miguel's
ability to bypass flue gas around the FGD
system, thereby  reducing the  energy
required for reheating the scrubbed flue
gas. This bypass was made possible by
the improved SOz removal in the  FGD
system  which resulted from organic acid
addition.
  An additional saying shown for the
DuPont acid is a .reduction in scrubber
maintenance costs. This reduction is a
result of  reduced  absorber and  mist
eliminator plugging which was attributed
to the low pH (low stoichiometry) oper-
ating conditions made possible by using
the DuPont acid. An equivalent saving is
not shown for the Badische acids  since it
was not possible to operate at the same
low pH's at the concentrations at which
these additives were tested.
  the  net result  of the organic  acid
addition test program at San Miguel is the
potential for a substantial  reduction in
 FGD system operating costs with any of
the organic acids tested. The maximum
 saving  is projected to result from use of
the DuPont DBA. As a result of the test
program at San Miguel and the economic
analysis summarized in this document,
San Miguel has made the use  of the
DuPont DBA material a part of the normal
operation of the Unit 1  FGD system.

-------

-------
     J. M. Burke is with Radian Corporation, Austin, TX 78766.
     J. David Mobley is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
     The complete report, entitled "Technical and Economic Evaluation of Organic A cid
       Addition to a CommercialFGD System," (Order No. PB 85-191 724/AS; Cost:
       $13.00. subject to change) will be available only from:
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Sp'ingfield,VA22161
             Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
             Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
             U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                 * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1985-55MH6/27062
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
                               OCOC329   PS
                               U  S  ENVIR  PROTECTION  AGENCY
                               REGION 5  LIBRARY
                               230  S  DEARBORN  STREET
                               CHICAGO               3L

-------