United States
                     Environmental Protection
                     Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                     Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-85/026 Aug. 1985
v>EPA          Project Summary

                     Testing of Wall-Fired
                     Furnaces to  Reduce
                     Emissions of  NOX  and SOX

                     P. L. Case, L Ho, W. D. Clark, E. Kau, D. W. Pershing, R. Payne, and M. P. Heap
                      This research project is one of several
                     programs sponsored by the  EPA to
                     investigate and develop simultaneous
                     nitrogen oxide/sulfur oxide (NOX/SOX)
                     emission control using limestone injec-
                     tion in multistage burners (LIMB). The
                     overall  technology  development  pro-
                     grams range from small-scale funda-
                     mental  investigations to pilot-scale
                     development studies. The overall  EPA
                     program includes analysis of boiler
                     design aspects of LIMB technology and
                     a full-scale, wall-fired utility boiler
                     demonstration. One concept of the EPA
                     LIMB program is that there are three
                     basic facets: scientific aspects, pilot-
                     scale studies,  and  application. LIMB
                     application is likely to be very  system-
                     specific, involving analysis of a partic-
                     ular fuel/boiler/burner system, selec-
                     tion of a sorbent and injection method,
                     and consideration of the impact of LIMB
                     on operation of the boiler.  Thus, the
                     results of investigations of the funda-
                     mental aspects of sulfur capture, pilot-
                     scale studies,  and the development of
                     models for the process are essential for
                     the application of LIMB technology.
                      This Project Summary was developed
                     by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering
                     Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
                     Park, NC, to announce key findings of
                     the research project that is fully docu-
                     mented in two reports of the same title
                     (see Project Report ordering informa-
                     tion at back).


                     Summary
                      The research  program  summarized
                     here provides information into the devel-
                     opment effort at several levels. The work
reported here involved direct investiga-
tions of the role  of fuel and sorbent
properties and fuel mineral matter inter-
actions.  Results of these experimental
efforts can be used to clarify the sulfate
formation process and to derive guide-
lines for determining sorbent injection
locations. In addition to the experimental
work, analytical development work was
performed, including the development of
a sulfur capture model, and the applica-
tion of heat transfer models.
  The overall goal of the research pro-
gram was the clarification of means to
reduce emissions of NOX and SOX from
the pulverized-coal, wall-fired combus-
tion systems found in utility boilers. The
work was divided into four separate tasks.
Task 1  provided detailed information
about sorbent and sulfur reactions under
conditions of particular interest. Task 2
evaluated the potential of a number of
design and sorbent options. Task 3 pro-
vided some information on the effect of
scale on the performance of systems
designed to reduce NOX and SOX. Task 4
summarized the data produced, providing
recommendations on optimum systems
and potential operational problems. Tasks
1 and 2, carried out in a 1 million Btu/hr
furnace, helped to determine:

 • The effect of fuel type and fuel mineral
   material on sulfur.
 • The effect of sorbent type on sulfur
   capture.
 • Detailed temperature and species
   characteristics of flames which gave
   significantly different sulfur captures.
 • The effect on sulfur capture of opera-
   tional characteristics  such as fuel

-------
   injector, burner zone stoichiometry,
   peak flame temperature, and load.
 • The effect of sorbent injection location.
 • The effect of LIMB on various furnace
   operational characteristics  such  as
   slagging, fouling, solids  loads, size
   distribution, and fly ash resistivity.

Taskl
  Conclusions from Task 1 include:

 • A good  inverse correlation  between
   added mineral matter alumina (A^Oa)
   content and sulfur capture during gas
   firing  has been observed; the  more
   alumina in the solid, the lower the
   capture,  using  either limestone  or
   dolomite
 • Sulfur capture  for the different coals
   tested with  limestone and  dolomite
   also showed a fairly consistent inverse
   correlation with the  calculated  AI203
   content of the ash sorbent mixture (at
   a Ca/S = 2.0).
 • Electron micrographs of sorbent min-
   eral samples show particles composed
   of  a  mixture of Al/Si and Ca. The
   particles are spherical and have been
   molten at some point in the furnace.
   The mechanism of mineral deactiva-
   tion and formation of these spherical
   particles is not clear and should be the
   subject of further investigation.
 • Electron micrographs of coal/sorbent
   samples also showed spherical par-
   ticles  composed of calcium and ash
   minerals such as Al, Si, and Fe.
 • Injecting the sorbent downstream from
   the main flame resulted in improved
   utilization in coal flames. Experiments
   with natural gas flames showed that
   the sorbents had somewhat higher
   surface  areas  in  the reaction  zone
   when  injected downstream. Gas-fired
   experiments using  mineral matter
   additives showed that mineral material
   deactivation of the sorbent  could  be
   reduced by injecting the sorbent down-
   stream of the main flame.


Task 2
  In Task 2, a fairly extensive data base of
sulfur capture for various fuel/sorbent
pairs was established. Six fuels and five
sorbents were tested (not  all possible
combinations of fuel/sorbent pairs were
included).
 • The effect of sorbent  type on capture
   with a given fuel  was dependent on
   the firing conditions—including sor-
   bent injection  location and thermal
   conditions. The hydrated limes seemed
   to be more sensitive to thermal condi-
   tions and the Vicron  limestone least
   sensitive. The German hydroxide gave
   better capture than the Colton hydrox-
   ide. It was not known why the two had
   different captures,  but the German
   hydroxide did have a generally smaller
   particle  size  distribution  than the
   Colton hydroxide. Dolomite gave the
   highest capture with  all of the fuels
   tested.
• The effect of fuel type on capture with
   a  given sorbent was  also system
   dependent  (injection  method,  firing
   characteristics,  and  thermal  condi-
   tions).
• In general, sorbent  size affected cap-
   ture only for large particles: at mean
   sizes less than 10/i
-------
a high temperature (>2300°F). Down-
stream sorbent injection (at temperatures
of about  2200°F) gave higher captures
than injection with the fuel for coal fired
tests,  because of decreased  mineral
matter interference and some increase in
sorbent surface area.  Further  experi-
mental work investigating the mechanism
of mineral deactivation, the possibility of
generating high  surface  area  (highly
reactive)  sorbents,  and  the effect of
sorbent injection on  boiler operating
characteristics (especially heat transfer
concerns such as f lame emissivity) should
clarify methods of further reducing emis-
sions.
P. L. Case, L Ho, W. D. Clark, E. Kau, D. W. Pershing, R. Payne. andM. P. Heap are
  with Energy and Environmental Research Corp., Irvine, CA 92714-4190.
Dennis C. Drehmel is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report  consists of two volumes, entitled "Testing of Wall-Fired
  Furnaces to Reduce Emissions of NO x and SO* "
  "Volume  1. Final Report," (Order No. PB 85-224 632/AS; Cost: $26.50)
  "Volume 2. Appendices." (Order No. PB 85-224 640/AS; Cost: $22.00)
The above reports will be available only from: (costs subject to change)
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/S7-85/026
                      PS
                     ?  PROTECTION
                                                                                           •frU.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE; 1985—559-01b/27122


                                                                       f.tl..lt.-._tl. II  li   *t*

-------