United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-85/043 Dec. 1985
SEPA          Project  Summary
                    Feasibility  Study  of  Enhanced
                    Combustion Via  Improved
                    Wood  Stove  Firebox  Design
                    Karen T. Fuentes and Leonard J. Hodas
                      Emissions from incomplete combus-
                    tion in wood burning stoves are becom-
                    ing an increasing environmental prob-
                    lem.  In this  study,  materials were
                    examined which might be used to line
                    the firebox of a wood burning stove to
                    produce more  uniform and complete
                    combustion. Although many materials
                    were  initially  considered,  refractory
                    materials appear to possess the quali-
                    ties desired relative to heat transfer, re-
                    sistance to the firebox environment,
                    availability, and cost. Specific  refrac-
                    tory materials have been further inves-
                    tigated,  resulting in a list of material
                    properties of potentially useful refrac-
                    tories and a determination of relative
                    installed costs. The approach used in
                    this study was to establish the condi-
                    tions for a "basic" wood stove, then to
                    apply various candidate lining materi-
                    als to the basic stove and analytically
                    estimate the effect of the lining addi-
                    tion. Basic heat transfer calculations
                    were used. The use of refractory materi-
                    als permitted an increase in stove inner
                    wall temperatures  and an  increased
                    cooldown time for a stove. The study
                    showed that refractory materials could
                    aid in maintaining internal firebox tem-
                    peratures above the ignition tempera-
                    tures  of  common  emissions.  This
                    would not be a practical operational
                    mode for an uninsulated stove.
                      The study concludes that there  is a
                    need for actual tests to confirm the re-
                    sults cited in the study.

                      This Project  Summary was  devel-
                    oped by EPA's Air and Energy Engineer-
                    ing Research Laboratory, Research Tri-
                    angle Park,  NC, to announce  key
findings of the research project that is
fully documented in a separate report
of the same title (see Project Report or-
dering information at back).
Introduction
  The use of residential wood burning
stoves has grown considerably in re-
cent years. As the use of these stoves
has increased, so has the amount of pol-
luting emissions.  Since these stoves
come in a very wide range of designs,
combustion and  resulting emissions
can vary widely. Additionally, opera-
tional parameters can result in signifi-
cantly different emission levels from the
same stove design. One design ap-
proach for reducing emissions is to
place material  inside the  firebox that
can lead to more complete combustion
of the wood charge and any emission
constituents present. Ideally any design
modification should be essentially pas-
sive;  i.e., requiring little or no attention
by the user. Also, due to the large num-
bers of existing wood burning stoves, it
is desirable that any modification lend
itself to the retrofit of existing stoves.

Existing Stove Designs
  From a review of the design and oper-
ational characteristics of existing resi-
dential wood stoves, it was determined
that various design factors could have a
significant effect on wood stove emis-
sions. These  design factors include
combustion chamber usage, combus-
tion controls and  drafting  design, and
certain operational factors, particularly
draft and flue adjustments.

-------
Resistance to the Combustion
Process and Increasing Com-
bustion Efficiency
  Any material placed in the firebox (for
emission reduction purposes) must be
resistant to the combustion process, in-
cluding: firebox temperature extremes
and heating and cooling rates, the fuels
utilized, and the products evolved dur-
ing combustion. Additionally, the mate-
rial should enhance the combustion
process while  not appreciably degrad-
ing stove operation or requiring  signifi-
cant  user attention. If a material in the
firebox can be maintained above the ig-
nition temperature of emission  con-
stituents (see Table 1), combustion can
take  place which can lead to emissions
reduction in the firebox.

Calculation Method:  Basic
Stove
  The initial approach used in this study
was  to employ standard  heat transfer
calculation techniques to determine a
temperature profile  for  a generic or
basic stove. The  basic stove was de-
fined as a cast iron firebox with 1/4-in.
(0.64 cm) wall  thickness and no lining.
The steady state temperature of the fire-
box  gases was assumed to be  1500°F
(816°C). A room temperature of  60°F
(16°C) was assumed. When these  tem-
peratures plus  appropriate heat transfer
coefficients were inserted  into the
standard heat  transfer equations (con-
sidering radiation, convective conduc-
tance, and conservation of energy), the
basic stove wall temperature was found
to be 720°F (382°C) and the heat trans-
ferred  (per square foot  of stove  wall)
was  about 4000 Btu/hrft2  (12.6 kW/m2).
These  values  define the steady  state
condition of the basic stove.

Calculation  Method:  Lined
Stove
  Several assumptions were required
to determine the steady state tempera-
ture  profile for a lined stove.  The heat
transfer rate and the outer wall temper-
ature of the lined stove were assumed
to be the  same as for the basic stove.
(Thus the heat output of  the stove will
not be affected by the installation of a
lining.) Additionally, an inner (liner) wall
temperature of 1200°F (649°C) was cho-
sen.  This temperature was selected as a
conservative adjustment  to the  carbon
monoxide  ignition temperature  of
1128°F (609°C) (see Table  1). That is, the
purpose of the liner is to  raise the tem-
perature of  the  inner stove wall  such
that the combustion of emission  con-
stituents can take  place. The use  of
these temperatures, appropriate  heat
transfer coefficients, and certain physi-
cal properties of a lining material permit

Table 1.    Some Combustion Products Re-
          sulting from Burning of Wood
Carbon monoxide3

    Naphthalene*

        Biphenyl0

        Benzened
Example of ROMs
(polycyclic or-
ganic matter)
"Ignition temperature 1128°F (609°C)
blgnition temperature 898-1017°F (481-
 547°C)
clgnition temperature 1071°F I577°C)
dlgnition temperature 1097°F (592°C)


the calculation of the required  lining
thickness  and a firebox gas tempera-
ture. The  required lining thickness will
vary for different materials in direct pro-
portion to the conductivity of the mate-
rial.

Calculation Method: Cooldown
  After the steady  state temperature
profiles of the basic and various lined
stoves were determined, the tempera-
ture loss or cooldown of the stoves was
calculated. The  cooldown rate of  the
stoves was assumed to be governed by
an exponential time function. The abil-
ity of a lining material to store heat  in-
creased the cooldown period  of lined
stoves  compared to the basic stove.
(See Figure 1.)

Candidate  Materials for Inclu-
sion in the Firebox
  A wide  range of materials were con-
sidered as candidate materials for inclu-
sion in a  wood  stove firebox. Factors
such as resistance to the process envi-
ronment,  cost, and  ease of fabrication
were considered during the initial eval-
uation of candidate materials. Addition-
ally, a material must enhance the com-
bustion process  by  the heat  transfer
methodology  previously  described.
Based on  these considerations and cal-
culations,  refractory  type  materials
were determined to be the most poten-
tially viable firebox lining materials.
  The effect  of various thicknesses of
typical  refractory materials on  inside
wall (liner) temperatures  is shown in
Figure 2. An inside wall temperature of
1200°F (649°C) was used as an effective
temperature  relative to the ignition of
emissions. An outside wall temperature
of 720°F (382°C) was used to maintain
an equivalent heating rate compared to
the basic stove. The required wall thick-
nesses for various refractory materials
were calculated based on the indicated
temperatures. Some of these wall thick-
nesses are shown in Table 2.

Ranking of Candidate Materials
  There are various ways of rating or
ranking the numerous candidate mate-
rials that exhibit acceptable process re-
sistance and potential enhancement of
combustion efficiency. A rating  criteria
of Total Installed Cost (TIC) per unit of
surface area would be of interest to both
wood stove manufacturers and owners.
The ratios of TICs for various refractory
materials were calculated based on the
previously described assumed temper-
ature  profile, with  medium duty  fire
brick assigned a ratio of 1.0 for new fab-
rication. Table 3 gives examples of the
TICs for various refractory materials.

Conclusions
  Various types of refractory materials
can be installed in a wood stove firebox.
These materials can lead to tempera-
tures  (occurring at and near the refrac-
tory surface) that are above the ignition
temperatures  of  many wood stove
emission constituents.
  A refractory lined stove has a longer
cooldown period than a metal stove.
  A quantification of the effectiveness
of emission reductions attributable to
the types of firebox designs considered
here should be determined  by  various
tests.
  The refractory materials that are rec-
ommended for testing include medium
duty fire brick, HW Super Castable, and
silica  brick.  These materials were se-
lected because their  relative total in-
stalled cost ratios (TICs) are less than
1.5. The calculated wall thickness re-
quirements for each of these materials
are similar, which would allow for a
more  consistent  comparison  during
testing. They also  represent typical ex-
amples of the broad spectrum of poten-
tial materials that could be  used.

-------
    1400
   (760)

    1200
   (649)

G  7000
£ <53a>
o
 «>   500

I <427>
 ^
 §.   600
|  (315)

     400 •
   (204)


     200
     (93)
                                    Tiw = Temperature of inner stove wall
                                    Tow =  Temperature of outer stove wall
                        Tiw  Medium Duty
                             Firebrick (MDFB)
                         f
                 Basic Stove
                     Tiw - Tow
                                            5     6

                                             Time, hr
                                                                 10
                                                                       11
Figure 1.
  Cooldown of a basic stove and a lined stove (1 in.—2.54 cm—of medium duty fire
  brick.
    1
           1500 -\
           (816)
           1400 •
           (760)
          1300
          (704)
          1200
          (649)
1100
(593)
Figure 2.
      01234567
             (2.54)    (5.08)    (7.62)   (10.16)   (12.70)   (15.24)   (17.78)

                   Insulation Thickness, in. (cm)

  Inner wall temperature versus insulation thickness.
                                                                              Table 2.    Calculated Wall Thickness for
                                                                                        Assumed Design Conditions of
                                                                                        1200°F (649°C) Inside Wall
                                                                                        Temperature, and 720°f
                                                                                        (382°C) Outside Wall Tempera-
                                                                                        ture for Various Refractory Ma-
                                                                                        terials
Material
Bricks
MDFB
K23 IFB
Silica
Mullite
Alumina (99/->
Silicon Carbide
Castables
Kast-seta
HW Super Castable"
Wall Thickness
in. (cm)

1.0
0.2
1.3
1.6
3.2
12.5

0.5
0.8

(2.54)
(0.51)
(3.301
(4.06)
(8.13)
(31.75)

(1.27)
(2.03)
                                                                             8A. P. Green Company
                                                                             bHarbison Walker Company
                                                                             Table 3.    Total Installed Cost (TIC) Ratios
                                                                                        Per Unit of Surface Area for Var-
                                                                                        ious Refractory Materials

                                                                                                                 TIC
                                                                                    Material                     Ratio
Bricks
MDFB
K23 IFB
Silica
Mullite
Alumina (99/-)
Silicon Carbide
Castables
Kast-set'
HW Super Castableb

1.0
0.5
1.4
8.8
69.8
438.5

0.6
1.0
                                                                                       M.P. Green Company
                                                                                       ^Harbison Walker Company

-------
    K. Fuentes and L. Hodas are with Radian Corp., Austin, TX 78766.
    Michael C. Osborne is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
    The complete report, entitled "Feasibility Study of Enhanced Combustion Via
      Improved Wood Stove Firebox Design," (Order No. PB 86-121 373/AS; Cost:
      $11.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Royal Road
           Springfield. VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
           Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
           U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
           Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S7-85/043
         0000129   PS
         U  S  ENVIR PROTECTION  AGENCY
         REGION  5  LIBRARY
         230  S  DEARBORN  STREET
         CHICAGO               IL   60604

-------