United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
 Industrial Environmental Research
 Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park NC  2771 Tx  w  ^
                    Research and Development
EPA-600/S2-83-065 Oct. 1983
c/ERA          Project Summary
                    Treatment  of Gaseous  Emissions
                    from  Steelplants Containing
                    Small  Concentrations  of
                    Hydrocarbon  Vapors
                    H. X. Lambert and Julian Szekely
                      In this research, the feasibility of
                    using a shallow fluidized bed of activated
                    charcoal to remove small concentrations
                    of hydrocarbon vapors in the presence
                    of water vapor is investigated. This
                    system can be applied to cleaning off-
                    gases from sinterplants, coke ovens,
                    rolling mills, oil quenching,  and/or
                    foundries. The investigated range of
                    hydrocarbon vapors is 100-500 ng /cm3
                    air.
                      It is found that a shallow fluidized bed
                    of activated charcoal can efficiently
                    remove hydrocarbons in preference to
                    moisture at 80°C. The  overall mass
                    transfer coefficient can be calculated
                    from data  obtained in  a  laboratory
                    apparatus, and the influence of various
                    parameters on the overall reaction rate
                    is discussed.
                      A  mathematical model based on
                    adsorption theory is presented, which
                    provides a means for testing the validity
                    of the assumptions and also for prelim-
                    inary scale-up calculations.
                      This Project Summary was developed
                    by EPA's Industrial Environmental
                    Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
                    Park, NC, to announce key findings of
                    the research project that is fulfy docu-
                    mented in a separate report of the same
                    title (see Project Report ordering
                    information at back).

                    Introduction

                      The purpose of this investigation was to
                    explore the possibility of developing  a
                    suitable secondary or tertiary treatment
                    technique for the removal of hydro-
                    carbons, present at low concentration
 levels,  say of the order of 0.01-0.02
 gr/ft3, from effluent gases.
  Problems of this type are of importance
 in steelplant operations,  where the
 effluent gases from sinterplants may
 contain hydrocarbons at such concentra-
 tion levels upon exiting from the electro-
 static precipitator unit. Other potential
 sources of effluent gases containing low
 levels of hydrocarbons are certain rolling,
 oil quenching, and coking operations,
 and/or foundries.
  Since at present there are no satis-
 factory demonstrated means for tackling
 this  problem, this research effort was
 thougnt to be of both theoretical and
 practical interest.
  The proposed approach was toexamine
 the feasibility of removing these hydro-
 carbons by passing the effluent gases
 through a shallow fluidized bed of porous
.adsorbent particles.
  The project was initiated  through the
 funding of this program by the American
 Iron  and Steel Institute. The  U.S. EPA
 provided co-funding  with AISI of this
 investigation for the period May 1,1977-
 April 30, 1979, the last 2 years of the
 program.          •         . '

  Preliminary experiments have shown
 that hydrocarbons may be effectively
 adsorbed onto the surface  of activated
 charcoal particles, in a shallow fluidized
 bed, operating at room temperatures.
 However, when the gas stream contained
 moisture as well  as hydrocarbons,
 adsorption  of moisture interfered with
 the removal  of hydrocarbons.  For this
 reason it was decided to construct an
 apparatus (see Figure 1) which allowed

-------
operation at somewhat elevated temper-
atures; i.e., the 70-100°C range.
  In essence this apparatus consisted of
a gas train, a hydrocarbon  saturator,
together with appropriate arrangements
to produce a  gas  stream containing  a
known amount of hydrocarbons. The gas
exiting the bed was analyzed using a gas
chromatograph.  The dimensions of the
fluidized bed are shown in Figure 2.

Summary of  Results

  A selection of typical experimental runs
isshown inTable 1 and in Figures, where
it is seen that satisfactory operation of the
system  is feasible at about 80°C where
the  activated charcoal  has  a good
capacity to adsorb hydrocarbons, but at
the same time only very little moisture is
being adsorbed.
  Experiments were also carried  out
using porous  alumina particles  as the
adsorbent.  However,  it  was found that
alumina is  not a suitable  adsorbent for
hydrocarbon? in the presence of moisture,
because alumina tends to adsorb moisture
preferentially.
  A mathematical model was also devel-
oped to  represent the adsorption process
in fluidized beds, where allowance  has
been  made for external mass transfer,
adsorption kinetics, and the back-mixing
of the gas stream. The resultant differ-
ential equations were solved numerically.
Figure 4 compares the theoretical predic-
tions and the experimental measurements:
the good agreement is readily apparent.
  It is concluded that activated charcoal
would  be  a  suitable medium for the
selective adsorption  of hydrocarbons in
the presence of moisture, when the
system  operated at a temperature of
about 80°C.  A suitable  contacting ar-
rangement could involve the use of
shallow fluidized beds (say 1-2 cm deep)
operated near the minimum fluidization
velocity (say at 2-3 times the minimum
fluidization velocity).
  Some preliminary design calculations
have been made to outline an industrial
scale operating system. These calcula-
tions, together with  additional experi-
mental details and details of the mathe-
matical model, are  contained in the
project report.
                                                     Key:
                                                      / . Cylinder of compressed air
                                                      2. Silica bed
                                                      3. Charcoal bed
                                                      4. Filter
                                                      5. Rotameters
                                                      6. Hydrocarbon saturator
                                                      7. Water saturator
                                                      8. Inlet heater
i
Air

T

1


A


Air

He

H2
12.
13.
                                                       9. Fluidized-bed heater
                                                      10. Fluidized bed
                                                      11. Temperature controller
                                                      12. Recorder
                                                      13. Gas chromatograph
 0 1-3/8 in.
    1/16-in.
Fluidized
Activated
Charcoal "*^
                                         Porous
                                         Material
                        \
                                         Figure 2.
                                                     The bed.
 Figure 1.   The apparatus.

-------
Table 1.    Adsorption of Hydrocarbon on Activated Charcoal

Run
No.
C9
C10
C11
C12

Temp
°C
25
80
100
125
Inlet
cone.
g/cm3
1.1x10~7
0.92x1 0~7
0.31x10~7
0.23x10~7
Duration
of run
mn
300
330
360
345
HC
removed
%
95
96
74
60
Moisture
adsorbed
mg
25
15
10
2
HC
adsorbed
gmol/g
132x10'5
164x1Q-5
32xW~5
23x10~s
 180
Figure 3.    Effect of temperature on uptake.

-------

       700
        80
        60
        40'
        20-
                                                             Computed
                                                            ' C17
           0             2             4             >
                                      Time, hr

  Figure 4.    Hydrocarbon uptake in the solid phase vs time.
                                           10
     H. X. Lambert andJ. Szekely are with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
       Cambridge. MA 02139
     John S. Ruppersberger is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
     The complete report, entitled "Treatment of Gaseous Emissions from Steelplants
       Containing Small Concentrations of Hydrocarbon Vapors," (Order No. PB 83-
       246 082; Cost: $13.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield, VA 22161
             Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
             Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                   irUS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1983-659-017/7204
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
  •  °r for Environmental Research
Im      -n
Cincm...    'H 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

-------