United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Laboratory
Ada OK 74820
                    Research and Development
EPA-600/S2-83-079  Nov. 1983
v>EPA         Project  Summary

                    Evaluating  Swine  Drylot
                    Runoff  Impact on  a  Coastal
                    Plain   Stream
                     James C. Barker, Frank J. Humenik, Michael R. Overcash, and Steve W. Tedder
                      The objectives of this study were: 1)
                     to  establish sampling  methodologies
                     for intensive monitoring of the environ-
                     mental impact of animal feedlot runoff
                     on in-stream water quality, 2) to
                     determine chemical changes in stream
                     water  quality as a result of rainfall
                     runoff from  swine drylots on deep
                     sands  by comparing these resultant
                     stream concentrations with those from
                     a background reach of stream, and 3) to
                     determine any changes in the stream
                     biota as a result of the drylot runoff.
                      A drylot unit was selected for investi-
                     gation which annually markets approxi-
                     mately 4000 hogs on dirt lots with deep
                     sandy soils and which typifies physical
                     and management factors common to
                     Coastal Plain swine production. Stream
                     samples were collected at sites above,
                     adjacent to, and downstream of the
                     drylots and analyzed for chemical
                     oxygen demand (COD), total Kjeldahl
                     nitrogen  (TKN), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-
                     N),total phosphorus (TP), and chlorides
                     (Cl) over a 40-month  period. These
                     measurements as well as dissolved
                     oxygen (DO)  and stream flow were
                     taken under low-flow  conditions by
                     grab sampling techniques while stream
                     samples  were collected under rainfall
                     conditions by instrumented sampling
                     stations. Biological surveys of  the
                     stream flora and fauna  were  also
                     conducted. These results are discussed
                     as  well as the  study  approach,  site
                     selection, and  sampling methodologies.
                      Field results indicated that approximate-
                     ly 2% of the nutrient and organic load of
                     the defecated swine wastes are trans-
                     ported from the sandy drylot  surface
                     during  rainfall runoff. The constituent
                     levels  of this lot runoff are  further
reduced 20- to 40-fold by swamp and
vegetative buffer filtering action  prior
to stream input.  Background stream
constituent concentrations were  very
similar to levels measured in geographic-
ally similar well-drained Coastal  Plain
watersheds. Nutrient levels, except for
phosphorus, below the drylot were
similar to background levels under low-
flow conditions. Nitrogen and chloride
stream  levels were approximately
doubled by rainfall runoff from the
drylot while phosphorus was elevated
approximately 5-fold. Despite these
nutrient level  increases,  however, no
significant alteration  of  the stream
biology was detected. It would appear
from  this  study that more emphasis
should be placed on the actual in-
stream biological changes that  may
occur as a result of point-source and
nonpoint-source  inputs  to reinforce
conclusions drawn from nutrient and
organic measurements.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Laboratory, Ada, OK, to
announce key findings of the research
project that is fully documented in a
separate report of the same title (see
Project Report ordering information at
back).

Introduction
  Effluent from farm animal production
areas is proclaimed as a  significant
contributor to  surface water pollution.
Different climatic, geographic, soil, and
vegetative conditions, as well as manage-
ment  practices,  however, profoundly
affect the quality and amount of rainfall
runoff and resulting stream impact  from
these animal production units. Concerns

-------
arise, then, over the implementation of
uniform  national  criteria for effluent
guidelines and limitations for concen-
trated animal feeding operations as
designated in the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act Amendments of 1972 and the
March 18, 1976 FederalRegister. Regula-
tory criteria should be responsive to the
needs and  desire of  the indigenous
population as it supports national goals.
The prudent balance between comprehen-
sive regulations  and criteria that  are
regionally responsive  to  both quality
environment and food  production must
be maintained.
  Decisions concerning control of rainfall
runoff from animal production units in a
specific  location should  include an
evaluation of whether  the constituents
adversely affect the quality of a particular
receiving water. It would be a misuse of
resources to attempt complete control of
any of these sources where they do not
have  an  adverse effect or where such
control will not produce a positive effect
on water quality. Such  decisions require
more factual information on the magni-
tude of the waste inputs to a stream, the
chemical  and  biological effects  on in-
stream water  quality, and benefits and
costs associated with control possibilities.
  Open swine production facilities (drylots)
on  soils  not supporting vegetation  are
classified as concentrated animal feeding
operations subject to the criteria outlined
in  the National Pollutant  Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) guidelines.
Approximately 45% of the 3.1  million
swine in  North Carolina are  grown on
such  drylot  units  since they represent
the minimum housing investment.  A
large majority of these drylots are on deep
sandy soils in the Coastal Plain section of
eastern North Carolina. Since a producer
may be able to finish up to three times as
many hogs in  an  open  lot system as he
could afford m confined housing, he may
have several hectares (ha) of drylots with
stocking densities ranging  from 500-
1250  market  hogs per ha.  Stocking
densities in this range quickly denude lots
of vegetation and will eventually kill any
trees within the confined area. Manure
buildup and  soil compaction are minimal
since animal activity tends to keep the
wastes well mixed with the sandy surface
of the well-drained soils.
  Drylots are  rotated  after one year's
production to control disease and parasites
and to allow  rejuvenation of the  soil
surface.  These lots are then  seeded to
grasses or allowed to remain fallow for at
least 2 years before being put back  into
production. Large swine drylots character-
istic of the Coastal Plain are usually
located on sloping topography but separated
from  a  drainageway or  stream by a
wooded or vegetated buffer strip. These
streams are ill defined and often traverse
through low-lying wet areas. The actual
control  of runoff  contaminants is  to a
large extent affected through proper site
selection and management practices.
  The major objectives of this study were:
 1. to  establish  sampling methodologies
   for intensive monitoring of the envi-
   ronmental impact of  animal feedlot
   runoff on in-stream water quality.
 2. to  determine  chemical changes  in
   stream water  quality as a result  of
   rainfall runoff  from swine  drylots on
   deep sands by comparing these
   resultant stream concentrations with
   those from  a  background  reach  of
   stream.
 3. to  determine  any changes  in the
   stream biota as a result of the drylot
   runoff.

Conclusions
  The results of 40 months of intensive
field monitoring of a Coastal Plain stream
receiving rainfall  runoff  from a swine
drylot  have  indicated  that  although
stream  nutrient levels are elevated
during rainfall events, the drylot is having
minimal impact on the receiving stream
biology.
  1. Approximately 2% of the defecated
swine wastes  is  transported from the
sandy drylot surface  during rainfall
runoff. Nutrient and organic constituent
levels of lot runoff are further reduced 20-
to 40-fold by  swamp and vegetative
buffer filtering action.
  2. Background stream constituent
concentrations were very similar to levels
measured in geographically similar well-
drained Coastal Plain watersheds. Nutrient
levels, except for phosphorus, below the
drylot were similar to background levels
under low-flow conditions.
  3. Surface runoff and tile drainage
from row-crop  land appears to have an
equal  or greater  impact on  stream
nitrogen levels under low-flow conditions
than  drainage  from the swine  drylot.
Nitrogen concentrations cycled seasonally
with peaks during the wet winter months
of low evapotranspiration and an additional
spike shortly  after spring fertilizer
application.
  4. Nitrogen and chloride stream levels
were  approximately doubled  by rainfall
runoff from the drylot while phosphorus
was  elevated approximately 5-fold
 Despite these  nutrient  level  increases,
 however, no  significant  alteration of the
stream  biology was detected through
biological analyses.
  5. Acquisition of flow data from
sluggish, unstable Coastal Plain streams
proved to be  very  difficult, costly and
time-consuming rendering the  cost
benefits of obtaining such data question-
able.
  6. Benefits have already accrued from
the cooperative effort of this investigation
with the state regulatory agency. It has
enhanced  the  working  relationship
between educational and regulatory
agencies, and the livestock producer
resulting in more logical implementation
of regulations which are responsive to
local conditions and needs, yet compatible
with national water quality goals.


Major Findings
  In-stream flow measurements proved
to be very difficult to obtain due to the
sluggishness  and  unstable  organic
bottom of  this  Coastal Plain  stream.
Consideration should be given in similar
related studies to the importance of mass
transport and just how flow data will be
used before expending the efforts neces-
sary to obtain such  information.
  Average and  extreme constituent
concentrations are  listed in Table  1 for
the  primary  sampling sites  on the
receiving stream under low-flow conditions.
Only a very slight dissolved oxygen sag
occurs in the receiving stream at the point
of maximum  drylot  impact, but  this DO
concentration recovers and exceeds
background levels through a downstream
reach.  The  minimum  measured DO
throughout the 40-month period of study
was 4.0 mg/l  which still  met water
quality standards  applicable  to the
surface waters of North  Carolina.
  Highest stream total  nitrogen levels,
particularly nitrate nitrogen, under low-
flow conditions were measured  near the
headwaters. This was probably due to tile
drain inputs from an adjacent row-crop
field since  a seasonal cycling trend
emerged with the nitrogen peak concentra-
tions occurring around January through
March with an additional spike in May.
This would  indicate that during the
growing season nitrogen  losses are
reduced due  to crop  uptake and less
moisture for  soil-water transport, but
after harvest more nitrogen becomes
available due to residue decomposition
and less evapotranspiration resulting in
greater soil-water transport. The additional
spike m May occurs after spring fertilizer
applications.  Nitrogen levels below the
drylot, although elevated,  were still
comparable to a geographically similar
North  Carolina watershed free of point
source inputs.

-------
Table 1.    Mean Constituent Concentrations of Receiving Stream Under Lo w-Flow Conditions
Water Quality
Parameter
DO.

COD.

TKN,

NOa-N.

TP.

Cl,

Flow,

mg/l

mg/l

mg/l

mg/l

mg/l

mg/l

cfs

Sampling Site
Headwaters
4.3*
1.2-10.2"*
27.12
11.76-75.10
1.37
0.45-4.35
1.46
0.23-4.33
0.13
0.02-0.43
7.2
5.0-12.1
0.099
0.021-0.260
Background
6.2
3.2-11.9
23.02
3.93-49.43
1.11
0.34-4.97
0.27
0 -2.00
0.07
0.02-0.15
5.9
4.0-8.5
0.207
0.009-0.768
Below Drylot
7.0
4.0-12.1
44.80
15.81-100.97
1.73
0.49-5.55
0.49
0 -2.60
0.41
0.09-1.35
7.0
2.6-12.6
0.404
0.076-1.062
Recovery
9.4
6.1-15.2
39.48
15. 75-75. 10
1.60
0.42-6.20
0.50
0 -2.48
0.38
0.12-0.78
7.1
2.7-12.9
0.458
0.091-0.923
 *Mean of approximately 50 sampling dates over a 40-month study period.
 * Range of values.
  Stream phosphorus levels were substan-
tially higher below the drylot under low-
flow conditions than background levels.
Visual inspection of the stream channel
indicates that most of the  sediment
transported from the lot in  runoff is
settled  or trapped by a swamp buffer
before it reaches the stream. Organic
wastes leaving the lot surface probably
also settle  in the swamp where the
phosphorus content of that  waste is
gradually and continually released to the
stream through drainage and subsurface
flow.
  The average coefficient of variation for
organic, nitrogen, and phosphorus stream
levels  during  individual rainfall  runoff
events was 30%.  Table 2 gives the mean
constituent concentrations of the receiving
stream as  well as drylot  runoff under
rainfall runoff conditions. Organic concen-
trations of lot  runoff decreased by
approximately 20-fold when compared to
stream concentrations indicating the
filtering capability of the swampy buffer.
In terms of mass transport based on five
runoff events, approximately 2% of  the
wastes defecated by the animals actually
left the lot surface during runoff.
  Total nitrogen  levels of lot drainage
during rainfall runoff events decreased by
40-fold when compared to stream levels
indicating the effects of swamp filtering,
denitrification, and stream dilution. Total
N stream levels below the drylot were ap-
proximately double background levels.
  Stream  phosphorus levels during
rainfall runoff indicated a 40-fold decrease
in the lot runoff  levels.  An average
phosphorus stream concentration of 0.74
mg/l below the drylot represented a 6-
fold  increase over background levels.
  Biological surveys of stream periphyton
and  stream benthos under low-flow and
rainfall runoff conditions  yielded no
variations between sampling sites for the
specific biological evaluation techniques
employed in  this study. Examination of
the  biological data  indicated that the
impact of drainage from the drylot on the
stream biota is minimal over the period of
time studied, however instream nutrient
and organic concentrations increased as
a result of drylot runoff.
Table 2.   Mean Constituent Concentrations of Drylot Runoff and Receiving Stream Under
          Rainfall Runoff Conditions
Water Quality
Parameter
COD,

TKN,

NO3-N,

TP,

Cl,

mg/l

mg/l

mg/l

mg/l

mg/l

Sampling Site
Headwaters
26.77*
3.90- 180.54*"
1.12
0.15-4.59
1.36
0 -3.70
0.10
004-0.50
7.76
3.00-14.40
Background
48.28
10.00- 166.03
1.46
0.45-4.88
049
0 -276
0.13
0.04-0.53
6.37
4.00-10.90
Below Drylot
78.08
29.00-577.00
2.61
0.75-21.01
1.77
0 -8.60
0.74
0.16-10.13
10.13
4.00-19.00
Drylot Runoff
1521.
403-3946.
105.
49 8-204.
7.25
0.03-26.80
31.00
8.40-54.00
96.6
50.6-169.
 "Mean of approximately 40 rainfall runoff events over a 30-month study period.
**Flange of values.

-------
    James C. Barker, Frank J. Humenik, and Michael R. Overcash are  with North
      Carolina State University. Raleigh. NC 27650; and Steve W. Tedder is with the
      North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development.
      Raleigh, NC 27611.
    R. Douglas Kreis is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
    The complete report, entitled "Evaluating Swine Dry lot Runoff Impact on a Coastal
      Plain Stream," (Order No. PB 83-263 699; Cost: $ 13.00. subject to change) will
      be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Robert E. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            P.O. Box 1198
            Ada, OK 74820
                                                    GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1983-659-017/7225
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

-------