United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                                                     Water Engineering
                                                     Research Laboratory
                                                     Cincinnati OH 45268
Research and Development
                                                     EPA/600/S2-85/062 Aug. 1985
&EB\          Project Summary
                    Demonstration  of Acceptable
                    Systems  for  Land  Disposal  of
                    Sewage Sludge
                     A project was conducted to demon-
                    strate systems for managing sewage
                    sludge application to farm land and to
                    investigate sludge-related health risks
                    to rural  residents and their livestock.
                    The study areas included four commu-
                    nities representative of Ohio condi-
                    tions-Columbus, Defiance, Springfield,
                    and Medina County.
                     The study demonstrated that large
                    municipalities can work cooperatively
                    with large numbers of farmers in a mu-
                    tually beneficial program. Health risks
                    were found to be insignificant when
                    sludge was applied at the low applica-
                    tion rates of this study using the man-
                    agement systems described here.
                     This Project Summary was devel-
                    oped by EPA's Water Engineering Re-
                    search Laboratory and Toxicology and
                    Microbiology Division,  Health  Effects
                    Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, to
                    announce key findings of the research
                    project that is fully documented in a
                    separate report of the same title (see
                    Project Report ordering information at
                    back).

                    Introduction
                     Sewage sludge has been disposed of
                    on farms throughout the United States
                    for many years,  with only occasional
                    problems arising from careless han-
                    dling or mismanagement. However,
                    such incidents can be irritating and pos-
                    sibly hazardous to the farm community.
                    The need existed for demonstrations of
                    the best available sludge application
                    technology. The potential problems and
                    health risks associated with sludge ap-
                    plications to land  are still real issues for
                    many Ohio farmers. Members of the
                    Ohio Farm Bureau Federation have re-
                    peatedly voted to sponsor or seek sup-
                    port for a project to demonstrate man-
                                  agement systems that would address
                                  the rural community's concerns and
                                  that would more clearly define the
                                  health risks to local residents and their
                                  livestock. This project met those needs
                                  by conducting 15 separate studies on
                                  the topics of concern. The general areas
                                  of study and  the results are discussed
                                  here briefly.

                                  Management Systems
                                   A major objective of this project was
                                  to define and  demonstrate sludge appli-
                                  cation management systems that would
                                  minimize adverse effects  on the rural
                                  community. The key factors in manag-
                                  ing land application  of sewage sludge
                                  on privately owned farm  land  are de-
                                  scribed as follows.
                                   A.  A large number of farmers and ap-
                                      plication sites should be involved
                                      so that the general public will not
                                      identify a particular farm or neigh-
                                      borhood as the sludge disposal
                                      site.
                                    B.  Public meetings, consultation with
                                      community leaders, field days,
                                      etc., should be  held to make the
                                      public fully aware of the scope, ob-
                                      jectives, and safety of the pro-
                                      gram. The residents of Ohio were
                                      generally supportive of the con-
                                      cept of  applying sludge to farm
                                      land as long as there was a consid-
                                      ered management approach that
                                      minimized odor problems,
                                      avoided nuisance situations in the
                                      transport and  handling  of the
                                      sludge, and maintained the metal
                                      content  of the sludge at reason-
                                      able levels.
                                   C.  These projects should use low
                                      sludge application rates that pro-
                                      vide enough sludge for either the
                                      nitrogen or phosphorus require-

-------
    ments of  crops. This concept is
    readily accepted by the public.
    Such rates provide for efficient
    use of the plant nutrients in  the
    sludge, and they minimize the  po-
    tential for surface  runoff and
    groundwater pollution since  the
    level of nutrients applied are com-
    parable with fertilizer applications
    on non-sludge-treated land. Low
    application rates also minimize
    the possibility of damages result-
    ing from the land application of
    unwanted metals or organics in
    sludge whose quality has not been
    adequately monitored.
 D. A rapport should be developed  be-
    tween  those who spread the
    sludge and the farmers who  re-
    ceive it. Someone versed in agron-
    omy is needed to serve as liaison
    between  the farmers  and  the
    sludge generator. This person
    should discuss with the farmer the
    nutrient value of the specific loads
    of sludge to be  received. The  liai-
    son should also present a contract
    to farmers to define  the working
    relationship between the farmer
    and the sludge generator. In gen-
    eral, the job  of  the  liaison is to
    trouble-shoot  and  maintain a
    good relationship between farm-
    ers and sludge generators.
  E. Sludge quality  should be moni-
    tored closely, and care should be
    taken to produce a well stabilized,
    odor-free sludge. Odorous
    sludges do arise when sewage
    plants are not functioning prop-
    erly. The disposal of such sludges
    on the land must not be consid-
    ered an emergency that the public
    must simply accept. A plan  for
    such situations should be worked
    out ahead of time.  At  the very
    least, odorous sludges should be
    incorporated  into the soil as they
    are applied on the land.
  When these  recommendations were
followed carefully, a good relationship
was maintained between  farmers  and
cities  of  all sizes. Large volumes of
sludge were applied to the land at  tow
application rates with very few com-
plaints from the public.
  Problems were encountered when
the City of Columbus applied a very
odorous sludge to farms in  Pickaway
County. This application  was consid-
ered an emergency effort by Columbus
officials and was not conducted as  part
of this project. Unfortunately, commu-
nications broke down between the pro-
ject staff and the city regarding this ap-
plication. The result was an injunction
by the Pickaway County Board of Health
against all land application of Columbus
sludge within Pickaway County. This ex-
perience indicates that application of
odorous sludges to the  land  requires
very careful planning. The only accept-
able approach  is to incorporate the
sludge as it is applied to the land.

Health Risks
  Another major objective of this pro-
ject was to evaluate health risks to rural
residents and their livestock resulting
from the application of sludge to crop
land. Studies were designed to deter-
mine whether the presence of sludge on
land in the rural community would  in-
crease the risk of disease above that as-
sociated with daily living.  Literature  re-
views  were also made  of the  risks
associated with  sewage sludge.
  Health risks were not significant when
sludge was applied using the low appli-
cation rates and management systems
of this study. The risks of respiratory ill-
ness, digestive illness, infection with
Salmonella,  Shigella sp.,  and Campy-
lobacter sp., and general symptoms of
illness were not significantly  different
between sludge and  control groups.
Similarly, no significant differences oc-
curred in the health of domes'tic animals
on sludge and control farms. Viral  infec-
tions among household  members
showed no significant difference in fre-
quency between the sludge and control
groups. Fecal Cd levels in humans were
not significantly affected  by the expo-
sure  of rural  residents to  sewage
sludges.

Agronomic Studies
  Agronomic studies were conducted
to support and evaluate the land appli-
cation program. Field plots were main-
tained to demonstrate that crop yield re-
sponse  to sludge, metal accumulation
in soils, and metal accumulation in plant
tissue under Ohio conditions were typi-
cal of results reported in the literature.
This information  was used in educa-
tional programs for the public and  for
sanitary engineers, public health offi-
cials, and other interested profession-
als.

Monitoring Sludges for Metals
  The  metal contents of six sludges
were monitored for 3 to 4 years. Sludge
samples were collected daily, and anal-
ysis was performed on a monthly com-
posite. These analyses were considered
sufficient for monitoring the quantities
of metals that might be applied to soils.
Compositions were reasonably steady
throughout this period. Abrupt changes
were observed only when sewage plant
modifications were started up or when
industrial pretreatment programs were
initiated.

Soil Compaction from Applica-
tion Vehicles
  Soil compaction studies were con-
ducted in the Medina project to evaluate
the possible damage to soil structure re-
sulting from the travel of application ve-
hicles through  fields. This  issue  re-
quires further study, since we could
observe compaction effects with only
one type of application vehicle on one
soil type. Also, the application rates in
the Medina area were fairly low and re-
quired only  one  or two  passes  of the
application vehicle to provide the total
annual application. Soil compaction re-
sulting  from the  sludge  application
equipment was not of great concern un-
der the  conditions of the Medina pro-
ject.

Nitrogen Mineralization and
Ammonia  Volatilization
  A number  of Ohio sludges were used
in laboratory studies of nitrogen miner-
alization and ammonia volatilization
losses from soils amended with sewage
sludge.  Nitrogen mineralization  of
sludge in soils was extremely variable,
depending on the sludge and field con-
ditions. Based on this research, a 30 per-
cent mineralization  rate is recom-
mended for estimating nitrogen release
when sludge is first applied to the land.
  The study  examined a  number of pa-
rameters that influence  the  volatiliza-
tion of ammonia from sludge-amended
soils. The most important observation
was that ammonia is quickly  lost when
sludges are  applied to soil surfaces. In
this project, sludges were applied to the
surface of soils and often remained on
the surface for a  week to 2 months be-
fore incorporation into the soil. Most of
the nitrogen  was assumed to have been
lost. Such losses cannot  be avoided
when applications are made to hay and
pasture  lands and to fields that support
application equipment but are not in a
suitable condition for tillage at the time.
PCB Degradation and Absorp-
tion
  A laboratory study was conducted on
the factors affecting soil  degradation

-------
 md plant absorption of PCB from PCB-
dmended sewage sludge. The sludges
used in the field demonstrations were
not contaminated with PCB, but con-
cern always exists about the possibility
of PCB soil contamination resulting
from application of sewage sludge. PCB
resisted biodegradation in  soils.
Volatilization from soils was decreased
by their organic component. Uptake of
PCB by Kentucky 31  fescue was very
limited. Possible contamination of crop
land with PCB and other toxic organics
is a concern to  farmers  who receive
sludge. More research is needed  on the
hazards associated with the presence of
these materials in the soil. Also needed
are less expensive and  more reliable
methods for monitoring the presence of
toxic organics in  sludge.

Status of Sludge Application in
Ohio
  A survey was made of the state of the
art of sludge application to land in Ohio.
A total of 56 landspreading communi-
ties were identified in this  state. The
quality of  landspreading  programs in
Ohio has been improved  substantially
over the past 5 years. Communities are
more  aware of the contents  of their
sludges, and they spread them  more ju-
diciously.

Computerized Economic Analy-
sis
  An economic analysis of sludge
spreading  on land was prepared in  a
computer format so  that the specific
conditions of a given  community could
be quickly evaluated. Land spreading of
a sludge is an economic method  of dis-
posal for most Ohio communities.

Extractability  of Cadmium
  The  effect of soil pH on  the ex-
tractability of Cd was  observed for sev-
eral Ohio soils and sludges in laboratory
studies. The  movement of Cd from
sludge-treated soils into the food chain
is a concern. The extractability of Cd in
sludge-amended soils increased dra-
matically  as the pH of the  system
dropped below 6.0.
  The full report was submitted in fulfill-
ment of Cooperative Agreement No. CS
805189 by the Ohio Farm Bureau Devel-
opment Corporation underthe sponsor-
ship of the Water Engineering Research
Laboratory  and  the Health Effects Re-
search  Laboratory's Toxicology and Mi-
crobiology Division of the U.S. Environ-
 lental Protection Agency.
Robert Bro wn is with the Ohio Farm Bureau Development Corporation. Columbus.
  OH 45216; Terry Logan, Richard Dorn, Vincent Hamparian, and Abramo C.
  Ottolenghi are with the Ohio State University, Columbus. OH 43210.
G. K. Dotson is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Demonstration of Acceptable Systems for Land
  Disposal of Sewage Sludge," (Order No. PB 85-208 874/AS; Cost: $37.00.
  subject to change) will be available only from:
       National Technical Information Service
       5285 Port Royal Road
       Springfield, VA 22161
       Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
       Water Engineering Research Laboratory
       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       Cincinnati, OH 45268

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
     BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
        EPA
  PERMIT No G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/S2-85/062
                                           PSftL
                             US  cPS   REGION  V
                             LIBRARY

                             CHICAGO"   ' 'C!?N  ST?L
                                                                                     •&U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1985—559-01b/27111

-------