xk"'
                   United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-85/115 Dec. 1985
&ERA         Project  Summary
                   Assessment of Organic
                   Contaminants  in Emissions from
                   Refuse-Derived  Fuel
                   Combustion
                   James Chrostowski, Dallas Wait,  Eleanor Kwong, Ann Jefferies,  Cheryl
                   Rodgers, and Neil Mosesman
                     Organic contaminants in emissions
                   from refuse-derived fuel combustion
                   were investigated in a 20-inch-diameter
                   atmospheric fluidized-bed combustor.
                   Combinations of coal/Eco- Fuel/ MSW/
                   toluene were burned in the combustor
                   with temperatures ranging from 1250
                   to 1550°F. A Source  Assessment
                   Sampling System (SASS) was used to
                   sample the stack gas; Level 1 method-
                   ology was used to analyze the organic
                   contaminant levels. Combustion effi-
                   ciences of 93 to 98 percent  were
                   achieved in the test burns. Combustion
                   of the Eco-Fuel generated fewer organic
                   emissions than combustion of coal at
                   similar combustion temperatures. The
                   fine particulate collected by the SASS
                   train filter contained higher concentra-
                   tions of extractable organics than the
                   reactor fly ash and the SASS cyclone
                   samples. Combustion of a toluene/Eco-
                   Fuel mix generated a large number of
                   benzene derivatives  not seen in the
                   combustion of pure Eco-Fuel. Polycy-
                   clic aromatic hydrocarbons were the
                   dominant organic compounds con-
                   tained in the XAO-2 resin extract from
                   coal combustion. A number of different
                   priority pollutants were identified in the
                   samples collected.
                     This Project Summary was developed
                   by EPA's Hazardous Waste Engineering
                   Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH,
                   to announce key findings of the research
                   project that is fully documented in a
                   separate report of the same title (see
                   Project Report ordering information at
                   back).
Program Objectives
  The primary objectives of this study
were to assess organic and trace metal
emissions from the combustion of refuse-
derived fuels (RDF) in  an atmospheric
fluidized-bed combustor (AFBC). A total of
four fuels were used in the test program,
namely coal, Eco-Fuel,  Municipal Solid
Waste (MSW), and reagent grade toluene.
A Source Assessment Sampling (SASS)
was used to collect the samples (solid and
liquid) for organic and trace metal anal-
ysis.
  Because of funding limitations for the
program, the SASS samples were anal-
yzed for organic content only and no trace
metal analyses were performed. A Level
1 approach was used to characterize the
organic content of the RDF combustion
effluents.
Description of Equipment
  A schematic of the 20-inch diameter
AFBC is shown in Figure 1. The solid fuel
is shredded to the desired size in the
William's hammermill. The size feedstock
is then loaded into a feed hopper. The
material is then fed through a rotary valve
into an Acrison metering screw which
directly discharges into the lower section
of the fluidized bed. In the run in which
liquid toluene was added to the reactor, a
tank was pressurized with  N2 and the
liquid toluene was metered through a
rotameter and then injected directly into
the bed through a small orifice. Combus-
tion air is provided by a positive displace-

-------
ment blower and is metered by an Erdco
flowmeter  which  was previously cali-
brated with SO2. A start-up burner is used
to preheat the bed sand to 800-900°F
before the introduction of the solid fuel.
  Thefluidized-bed reactor is a refractory-
lined vessel 20 inches in inside diameter
and  approximately 20 feet high. A per-
forated Inconel plate is used as the com-
bustion air distributor. Refractory grog, a
high AI203 material, is employed as the
bed material.

Description of Feedstocks for
Combustion Testing
  The three solid feedstocks employed in
the AFBC testing were Battelle Coal, Eco-
Fuel provided by Combustion Equipment
Associates, and MSW provided by Ameri-
cology. Reagent grade toluene was also
used to simulate combustion of a haz-
ardous waste. The properties of the solid
fuels (size, HHV, moisture, ultimate anal-
ysis, and fusion temperature)  are sum-
marized in Table 1.
  The test runs  were performed with
feedstock mixes shown in Table 2.
                                     Table 1.    Coal RDF Suppliers and Fuel Properties

Supplier

Crushed Coal
Battelle
Feedstock
Eco-Fuel
Combustion
Equipment
Associates

Americology-MSW
American Can
                                                       4
                                     Size
                                     Heating Value
                                     (HHV.Btu/lbm.f.)

                                     Moisture (% wet basis)

                                     Ultimate Analysis
                                     (wt%. m.fj
                                       Sulfur
                                       Carbon
                                       Hydrogen
                                       Nitrogen
                                       Oxygen
                                       Chloride
                                       Ash

                                     Fusion Temperature f°F)
23%>1.7 urn
59% mid-range
18%>300 urn

12953
 8.11
 1.4
74.2
 4.9
 1.3
 9.0

 9.2
 27%<170mesh
 30% 170/230 mesh
 42%230/325 mesh

 7827
                  4.7
  0.61
 40.0
  4.6
 <0.1
 45.5
  0.26
  9.0

-1800
  6430
                     26.6
   0.3
  51.0
   6.8
   0.7
  26.0

  15.2

-1300
                                   Freeboard Upper Temperature
                                              /
              Freeboard Cooling i

     Freeboard Lower Temperature
                         >v
                                                                             Gas Analysis
                                                                               fOz. SOa
                                                                             /VO* CO. GC)
 Rotary Valve


          l\£_^t__2I—^BBM
           Acrison Screw

Preheat Burner —W"
                             • Air

                Fluid/zing Air Blower


 Figure 1.    Pilot-plant schematic.
                                                        Flyash

                                                    In-Bed Cooling Tubes
                                                    M^M.	
                                                     -«.—__
                                                          	— Fluid Bed Temperature
                                                    Inconel Distributor

-------
 Table 2.    Feedstock Mix Composition

    Run ID        Coal       Eco-Fuel
   MSW
Toluene
                            Total
17
18
22
23
24
25
50
100
100
50
—
--
50
..
..
50
100
82
100
100
100
100
100
18 100
 Organic Analysis—Level 1
 Procedure
  Analysis of the SASS samples and the
 reactor fly ash sample was performed by
 the Level 1  methodology developed by
 EPA-IERL/RTP  (1978).  The samples
 which were analyzed included the (1)
 XAD-2 resin, (2) combined cyclones, (3)
 particulate filter, (4) organic trap conden-
 sate, (5) reactor fly ash, and (6)  the
 feedstocks. A summary of these methods
 is shown in Figure 2.
  Extracts were first analyzed by flame
 ionization gas chromatography to deter-
 mine the total chromatographable organ-
 ics (TCO) present.
  After the initial TCO screen, the extract
 is concentrated and a gravimetric deter-
 mination is done to quantitate organics
 with boiling points higher  than 300°C. If
 the sum of the gravimetric data and TCO
 is less than 15 mg, indicating  minimal
 organic contamination, then  infrared
 spectroscopy (IR) is performed on the total
 extract, thus completing the analysis. The
 IR spectrum indicates the types of func-
 tional moieties present in the sample, as
 well as providing a control for subsequent
 sampling. The  IR analyses were per-
 formed on a double-beam  infrared spec-
 trophotometer equipped with a microproc-
 essor and NaCI plates. The scans were
 performed from 4000 cm'1 to 200 cm"1 at
 a scan rate of 12 minutes. A polystyrene
 film  was used to calibrate the instru-
 ments.
  If the sum of the gravimetric data and
 TCO is greater than 15 mg, the extract
 must be fractionated into a similar chem-
 ical class according to polarity, and each
 fraction is subjected to TCO and  grav-
 imetric analysis and depending on those
 results, is analyzed by IR  and capillary
 GC/MS. It should be noted  that IR
 interpretation of complex samples is
 prone to errors. For this reason the
 GC/MS analysis is useful in providing
corroborative information for IR, as well
as supplemental data for additional iden-
tification.
 Organic Analysis—Level 1
 Results
   A preliminary examination of the total
 extractable content indicates that a  ma-
 jority of the RDF combustion samples
 contains relatively low amounts of char-
 acterizable organics. The values for the
 sum of the gravimetric  data  and TCO
 were used to determine whether there
 was an adequate quantity of organics
 present to  employ the column chroma-
 tography fractionation scheme and sub-
 sequent GC/MS analysis. A summary of
 the relative quantities of organics present
 in the RDF samples is given in Table 3.
 Regardless of organic content, all feed-
 stock extracts  were fractionated and
 analyzed to provide background informa-
 tion for data interpretation.
   Substantial quantities of organics were
 generally found only in the XAD-2 resin,
 which was used to filter the combustion
 vapor. Interestingly, quite a few of the
 organics identified here have previously
 not been detected in combustion efflu-
 ents. A review of the organics found in
 each RDF combustion experiment follows:


 Pure Coal Burned at 1500°F
 (Run #18)
   In terms of concentration, most of the
 organics detected in the  combustion ef-
 fluent of this burn resided on the XAD-2
 resin, and to a lesser extent on the partic-
 ulate filter. The fractionation scheme
 indicates organics to be present through-
 out the full polarity  range. Polycyclic
 aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were  the
 dominant organic compounds contained
 in the XAD-2 resin extract,  which is not
 surprising,  since PAH are recognized
 constituents of coal, as well as the  by-
 product of combustion processes. This is
 of special interest since  many PAH  are
 known chemical carcinogens and many
 are considered  by  EPA  to be priority
 pollutants. Other chemical classes  de-
tected include some heterocyclic com-
 pounds,  cyanoaromatics, phenols,  and
oxygenated aromatics (e.g., benzaldehyde
and anthraquinone). A GC/MS screen
was also performed on the total extract
derived from the particulate filter. This
sample contained  PAH compounds of
higher molecular weight than those seen
in the XAD extract, such as benzofluor-
anthenes, benzopyrenes, and perylene.

Pure Coal Burned at 1250°F
(Run #22)
   The combustion of coa I at lower temper-
atures than the preceding burn produced
effluents with lower organic content. This
may be attributable to the reduced fluid-
izing velocity for this run compared to run
#18. The only GC/MS analysis performed
on this sample was the total extract from
the organic trap condensate. PAH were
again quite evident. A very unusual com-
pound, dibenzoheptafulvne, was also
detected.  This compound  has not yet
been recorded in the literature as being
present in combustion emissions.

Pure Eco-Fuel Burned at 1500°F
(Run #24)
  The organic composition of the Eco-
Fuel refuse material was primarily ali-
phatic hydrocarbons, as well as trace
quantities of organic acids  and esters.
After combustion, GC/MS analysis of the
cyclone material and  the  organic trap
condensate indicated  that significant
quantities of phenol and benzoic acid
were present. Both compounds are likely
oxidative degradation products of lignin
(polymer of phenylpropanoids). Lignin is
the main constituent of wood, and thus is
present in the paper waste contained in
the Eco-Fuel refuse. Other compounds
that may  be indirectly  generated from
lignin include chlorophenol, bromophe-
nol, phthalide, cumene, and chromone.
PAH compounds  and  a few nitrogen
heterocyclic compounds were also pres-
ent. Nitrogen heterocyclics, which were
detected in the trap condensate, are also
known to  be found in  combustion pro-
cesses and in some cases are suspected
carcinogens.

50 Percent Eco-Fuel/'50
Percent Coal Burned at 1500°F
(Run #17)
  A  majority of the organic emittants
produced from the combustion of this
feedstock  combination  were  contained
on the XAD-2  resin. A variety of com-
pounds  were detected  in this  extract.
Compound classes included aliphatic
hydrocarbons, PAH, heterocyclics, oxy-

-------
                          Organic Extract
                           Concentrate
                           Extract
               Infrared A nalysis
                                                   TCO Analysis
            Gravimetric
            Analysis
         Repeat TCO
         Analysis if
         Necessary
                        Aliquot Containing
                         15-100 mg
                         Solvent Exchange
                         Liquid
                         Chromatographic
                         Separation
                          Seven Fractions:
    Infrared A nalysis
SE-52 Capillary
GC/MS Analysis
TCO and
Gravimetric
Analysis
Figure 2.    Level 1 organic analysis methodology (EPA, 1978).

                                  4
genated aromatics, and aromatic nitrites.
Most of these compounds were originally
present in  the combustion effluent of
either the pure coal or pure Eco-Fuel.

£'co-FuelV Toluene Burned at
1550°F(Run#25)
  The addition of toluene to the Eco-Fuel
refuse generated a  large number of
benzene derivatives not  seen  in  the
combustion of pure Eco-Fuel. The list of
new compounds includes  bi-, tri-,  and
tetrachloro isomers of benzene, diphenyl
methane, terphenyl isomers, benzoic acid
esters, and thiobenzoic acid. Trichloro-
benzene is currently included on EPA's
priority pollutant list. Some alkylated PAH
compounds  were also unique to this
combustion effluent,  as well as some
keto-aromatics (fluorene, benzophene,
and acetophenone).

50 Percent MSW/50 Percent
Coal Burned at 1250°F
(Run #23)
  The  combination of  MSW and coal
seems to have generated lower quanti-
ties of organics in the SASS than the
combination of Eco-Fuel and coal. Quali-
tatively the  MSW feedstock contained
many of the same organic acids and acid
derivatives present in the Eco-Fuel; how-
ever, the large qua ntity of aliphatic hydro-
carbons present in the Eco-Fuel refuse
was not present  in the MSW.  In  the
combustion of MSW coal, all organics
identified in the cyclones were similar to
those identified in the Eco-Fuel coal burn.
However, in the condensate there were
many unique compounds  identified, in-
cluding isophorone, 2, 4-dimethylfuran,
2-formylimidazole, 2-methyl hydroqui-
none, nitrobenzene, and 1,3-dlcyanoben-
zene. Isophorone is currently listed as a
priority pollutant.

Conclusions

• Combustion efficiencies of 93 to 98
   percent were achieved with the var-
   ious coal/Eco-Fuel/MSW/toluene
   feedstock mixes in the 20-inch-diam-
   eter fluidized-bed reactor. Reaction
   temperatures ranged from 1250° to
   1550°F  and fluidization velocities
   ranged from 2.7 to 4.4 fps.
• Most of the extractable organic emis-
   sions collected by the SASS train were
   collected on the XAD-2 resin and in
   the organic module condensate.
• The extractable organic concentration
   of the particulate from the SASS train

-------
  filter is higher than that of the reactor
  fly ash and the SASS combined cy-
  clones.
  There  is no correlation between the
  total extractable organics emitted per
  pound of feedstock compared with the
  extractable  organic  content of the
  feedstock.  However, the extractable
  organics collected by the XAD-2 resin
  and  the  organic module  condensate
  (per  pound  of feedstock) are clearly
  less for the pure Eco-Fuel run  (#24)
  compared to the runs with either pure
  coal (#18)  or 50/50:Eco-Fuel  Coal
  (#17).
  Reducing the coal combustion temper-
  ature  from  1500°F (Run  #18) to
  1250°F (Run #22) increased the con-
  centration of extractable organics in
  the reactor fly ash.
  Adding toluene to the Eco-Fuel did not
  increase the total organic emissions
  (per  pound of feedstock), but did result
  in significantly more emissions  asso-
  ciated with the XAD-2 resin and the
  organic module condensate samples.
  Polycyclic  aromatic hydrocarbons
  (PAH)  were the dominant  organic
  compounds contained in the XAD-2
  resin extract from the coal combustion
  runat1500°F(Run#18).
 i In the  combustion of pure Eco-Fuel at
  1500°F (Run #24), reduced  amounts
  of PAH compounds were found. Signif-
  icant amounts of phenol and benzole
  acid were identified.
 i Adding toluene to the Eco-Fuel refuse
  generated a large number of benzene
  derivatives not seen in the combustion
  of pure  Eco-Fuet. The list  of new
  compounds includes bi-, tri-, andtetra-
  chloro isomers of benzene.
Table 3.   Relative Amounts of Organics in SASS
Run ID
18
22
24
17

25

23

Experiment
Pure Coal at 1500°F
Pure Coal at 1250°F
Pure Eco-Fuel at 1500°F
50% Eco-Fuel/
50% Coal at 1 500° F
Eco-Fuel/
Toluene at 1550°F
50% MSW/
50% Coal at 1250°F
XAD-2
Resin
A
B
B
A

A

B

Combined
Cyclones
B
B
B
B

B

B

Paniculate
Filters
B
B
B
B

B

B

Trap
Condensate
B
B
B
B

A

B

Fly Ash
B
B
B
B

B

B

Key
  A = Organics present in substantial quantities. Full Level 1 protocol used.
  B - Organics present in relatively low concentration.
                                                                          •&U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1986/646-l 16/20733

-------
    James Chrostowski, Dallas Wait, Eleanor Kwong. Ann Jefferies, CherylRodgers,
      and Neil Mosesman are with Energy Resources Co., Inc.,  Cambridge. MA
      02138.
    Michael Black is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
    The complete report, entitled "A ssessment of Organic Contaminants in Emissions
      from Refuse-Derived Fuel Combustion," (Order No. PB 86-110 921 /AS; Cost:
      $16.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-85/115
              «»
                               "10N
         CHICAGO

-------