United States
                     Environmental Protection
                     Agency
Environmental Research
Laboratory
Athens GA 30613
                     Research and Development
EPA-600/S4-83-006  May 1983
oEPA          Project Summary
                    Preconcentration  Methods for
                    Trace  Element  Determination
                    D. E. Leyden
                      Monitoring the safety of drinking
                    water and water supplies requires an
                    analytical capability to determine many
                    toxic elements  at low part-per-billion
                    concentrations. Ideally, all elements of
                    concern  should  be measured
                    inexpensively.  Inductively coupled
                    plasma  (ICP) atomic  emission
                    spectrometry  is  a cost-effective
                    technique  for the  direct  analysis of
                    water samples for the elements of most
                    concern. At the start of this project,
                    however, ICP did not have adequate
                    sensitivity  to guarantee  compliance
                    with drinking water standards and was
                    subject to  interference from the more
                    prevalent elements, such as Na and Ca.
                    Thus,  some  form of separation and
                    preconcentration was required to make
                    ICP applicable to drinking water.
                      In this study, seven  concentration
                    techniques were examined, including
                    several that involved precipitation with
                    selected  reagents. Although the
                    precipitates could be redissolved for
                    analysis  with ICP, their concentrated
                    and solid form  made them especially
                    amenable to direct analysis by energy-
                    dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF).
                    Consequently,  EDXRF  was   given
                    considerable attention in evaluating the
                    concentration methods. The study was
                    extended to include the EPA Priority
                    Pollutant elements  exclusive of Be,
                    which is not sufficiently amenable to X-
                    ray excitation.
                      From the systematic study of seven
                    preconcentration techniques, it was
                    concluded that precipitation with salts
                    of dibenzyldithiocarbamate was best
                    overall.  An  added  benefit  of the
                    technique  was the  possibility  of
                    distinguishing the valence states of
                    several   elements by  selective
                    precipitation.  The recommended
                    method  was verified by analysis of
                    certified  reference  materials  and  by
comparison with atomic absorption
spectrometry (AAS) in the analysis of
14  potable  and  surface  water
specimens.
  This Project Summary was developed
by  EPA's  Environmental  Research
Laboratory, Athens. GA. to announce
key findings of the research project that
is fully documented in a separate report
of the same title (see Project Report
ordering information at back).

Introduction
 As  the amount and diversity of the
anthropogenic input to the environment
changes, so too  does the demand on
analytical techniques to monitor environ-
mental changes. This is particularly so in
the case of trace elements in natural and
processed water systems where the
balance between  biological toxicity and
dietary necessity is narrow and ill-defined.
The need to measure a relatively large
number of elements at ever lower con-
centrations in a wide variety of samples
continues to be a high priority of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
This study of published preconcentration
methods for measuring trace elements
was instituted to  aid in determining the
"best" method for preconcentrating the
elements in the Priority Pollutants list for
subsequent X-ray fluorescence analysis.

Procedures
  The preconcentration procedures
were:
     Complexation by 8-hydroxyquino-
     line (oxine) and adsorption of the
     complexes on activated carbon.

     Precipitation by ammonium pyrro-
     lidinedithiocarbamate,

     Complexation by a dithiocarbamate
     previously immobilized on
     controlled pore glass,

-------
     •  Precipitation by sodium  diethyldi-
        thiocarbamate,

     •  Precipitation by sodium dibenzyldi-
        thiocarbamate,

     •  Precipitation  by  thionalide  using
        poly(vinylpyrrolidone) as  a carrier,
        and,

     •  Filtration   through  a cation
        exchange resin impregnated filter
        paper.

     Each of the seven procedures had to
   produce a product conducive  to  multi-
   element  analysis  using  energy  or
   wavelength  dispersive  X-ray fluores-
   cence  analysis.  Each  procedure was
   evaluated using eight criteria:

     •  Ability to form a homogeneous thin
        film sample,

     •  Ability  to recover  and detect 15
        elements (excluding beryllium) on
        the EPA list of Priority Pollutants,

     •  Extent of calibration range,

     •  Linearity of  calibration,

     •  Overall method precision,

     •  Applicability to natural waters,

     •  Resistance to   concomitant
        element,  organic compound, and
        matrix interferences, and

     •  General  analytical  utility,
        ruggedness,  and  availability  of
        reagents and materials.

   Conclusions and
   Recommendations
     The results of the studies proved that
   precipitation   of  trace   ions  with  the
   sodium  salt  of dibenzyldithiocarbamate
   with  subsequent filtration  on  a
   membrane filter and analysis of that filter
       with  energy dispersive X-ray spectro-
       metry (EDXRF)  can  provide reliable,
       simultaneous determinations of as many
       as  15 elements from the EPA Priority
       Pollutants list (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn,
       As,  Se,  Ag,  Cd,  Sb,  Hg, Tl,  Pb).
       Concentrations as low as 2-5 pgL-1 may
       be determined in a 100 mL sample with
       an accuracy and a precision of approxi-
       mately 5-10%. Analysis time and cost are
       reasonable  and  certainly  competitive
       with AAS and ICP. The conclusions fall
       short of supporting the recommendation
       of  preconcentration/EDXRF  as  a
       replacement  method  for AAS or ICP.
       However, they do  strongly suggest the
       method as an alternative. The successful
       use  of  UV-irradiation  to  reduce  the
       concentration  of  organic  interferents
       provides  a  simple   method for  the
       elimination  of the  problem. In  most
       natural water analyses, the preconcentra-
       tion/EDXRF method was less subject to
       interferences and matrix problems than
       AAS. This is the most obvious in cases of
       large variations  in the concentration of
       minor elements in the sample.
         The results clearly suggest that pre-
       concentration/EDXRF should serve as a
       reliable and economical method for trace
       element  determinations  in  natural,
       drinking,  and  effluent  waters.   The
       technique  should  definitely be
       considered  for multielement screening
analyses such  as  those conducted on
industrial effluent waters. It is probable
that the  development  of  a detailed
procedure would be required for each
case. However, this is true with other
spectroscopic techniques as  well. One
cannot expect good results from  atomic
emission techniques without the use of
matrix matching or other precautions
specific to the problem. The simplicity of
sample  preparation, the durability and
longevity of the prepared specimens,and
the  economy of  the   use  of  energy
dispersive X-ray spectrometry for simul-
taneous  multielement  determinations
are  significant  advantages.   It  is
recommended that  the EPA support such
analytical  methods for  the  rapid and
reasonably  accurate  screening  of
industrial  effluent  and  environmental
waters.  Such a capability could  protect
against serious spike pollution resulting
from failure of industrial water treatment
processes.
  The cases in which the preconcentra-
tion/EDXRF method fails to provide total
elemental concentration in the sample
are  often  related to  some type  of
speciation such as  oxidation state of the
ion. These limitations can be turned into
an  advantage.  This  report  illustrates
several examples such as the determina-
tion  of  the  concentration  of oxidation
states of Cr, As, and Se in water samples.
          D. £ Leyden is with the University of Denver. Denver, CO 802O8.
          R.  V. Moore is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
          The complete report entitled "Preconcentration Methods for Trace Element
           Determination," (Order No. PB 83-172 536; Cost: $11.50, subject to change)
            will be available only from:
                  National Technical Information Service
                  5285 Port Royal Road
                  Springfield.  VA 22161
                  Telephone: 703-487-4650
          The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                  Environmental Research Laboratory
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                  College Station Road
                  Athens. GA 30613
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                           ftU.S. Government Printing Office  1983-659-017/7050

Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
                Postage and
                Fees Paid
                Environmental
                Protection
                Agency
                EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
               0000329

-------