SEPA
                                  United States
                                  Environmental Protection
                                  Agency
                                  Health Effects Research
                                  Laboratory
                                  Cincinnati OH 45268
                                  Research and Development
                                  EPA-600/S1 -81 -040  July 1981
Project Summary
                                  Temporal  Variability of
                                  Toxic  Contaminants in
                                  Animal  Diets
                                  J. P. Bercz
                                   Uncertified commercial research
                                 animal feed (Purina Chow™) was
                                 analyzed over forty-one months to
                                 determine essential and trace elements
                                 and toxic contaminants. Parametric
                                 statistics and graphic chronologic
                                 progressions of the  results are pre-
                                 sented for cat, monkey, rodent (rat/
                                 mouse), guinea pig and dog diets.
                                 Concentrations of toxic contaminants
                                 are discussed in terms of Maximum
                                 Allowable Concentrations (MAC)
                                 proposed by EPA. The impact of un-
                                 desirable contaminants on in vivo
                                 animal studies is analyzed. Practical
                                 aspects of cost-effectiveness of feed
                                 analysis in a major research setting is
                                 discussed.
                                   This Project Summary was develop-
                                 ed by EPA's Health Effects Research
                                 Laboratory,  Cincinnati, OH,  to an-
                                 nounce key findings of the research
                                 project that is fully documented in a
                                 separate report of the same title (see
                                 Project Report ordering information at
                                 back).

                                 Introduction
                                   In recent years increasing attention
                                 has focused  on nutritional and toxico-
                                 logical qualities of feed and water
                                 administered to experimental animals.
                                 Governmental regulations were pro-
                                 posed by the Food and Drug Administra-
                                 tion and by EPA tocontrol quality of non-
                                 clinical animal testing. Within the broad
                                 range of requirements for quality assur-
                                  ance, the Good Laboratory Practices
                                  (GLP) regulation mandates description
                                  and periodic analysis of animal feed.
                                   Maximum Allowable Concentrations
                                  (MAC) for critical toxic substances in
                                  feed have been proposed by EPA based
                                  on the recommendation of the National
                                  Research Council's Committee for Long
                                  Term Holding of Laboratory Rodents.
                                   In spite of the growing concern about
                                  feed contamination,  only limited infor-
                                  mation is available in the literature
                                  about types, sources and timing of
                                  contamination.
                                   In the past literature several authors
                                  dealt extensively with rodent feed con-
                                  tamination and its potential impact on
                                  toxicological procedures. Literature
                                  listings of multiple  assays on rodent
                                  chow provide neither source nor
                                  chronology of sampling.

                                  Objectives
                                   This report summarizes  our labora-
                                  tory's experiences since mid-1976 in
                                  testing uncertified animal diets. In
                                  compliance with Agency-wide policy for
                                  quality assurance and in anticipation of
                                  the imminent GLP regulations,  we
                                  initiated analyzing all batches of feed
                                  purchased  from Purina. The mode of
                                  analysis was retrospective, e.g. sampling
                                  and analysis was done immediately
                                  upon receipt of the feed lot. Assay data
                                  was available a- month later, by which
                                  time the feed was dispensed for con-
                                  sumption.

-------
  The project included six diet types,
and thirty components were assayed in
each  of these formulae during varying
segments of 41 contiguous  months,
from  June 1976 to December 1979
inclusive. Classification of these was as
follows:
  • Essential elements, for which the
    manufacturer specifies values in
    composition charts.
  • Toxic elemental and'molecular
    contaminants for which MACs
    have been proposed by EPA.
  • Elements of undefined significance.
    The manufacturer neither attempts
    to control these, nor provides state-
    ments regarding levels in feed.
  The intent of this report is to: provide a
chronological "snapshot" of a popular
commercial  feed; discuss the appro-
priateness of MACs; and evaluate meth-
ods of feed analysis.

Conclusions
  Essential Elements -  The  range of
variations indicated reasonably  rigid
control  in the manufacturing  process.
Mean concentrations of each elemental
component were comparable across
feed types, and corresponded  to those
listed  by the manufacturer in composi-
tion charts.

Toxic Contaminants
  Cadmium - More than one third  of all
observations on all feed types exceeded
the EPA limit. Had we  obtained the
monthly analytical data before we
administered  the feed to our  rodents,
based on the EPA MAC, we would  have
had to reject 34% of the lots. In practice,
the exclusion of the diets exceeding the
arbitrary MACs was not necessary due
to the nature of the studies being
undertaken in our laboratory.
  Lead - The variability of this element
was particularly high in cat, monkey and
rodent chows. The ambient  range in
rodent feed presented a practical  con-
cern to  our investigators because of  a
previous experience. During  1978,  a
large rat cross-fostering study involving
low lead levels in drinking water had to
be invalidated because  of an outlier
{2.59  mcg/g) lead level occurring in
rodent chow.
  Mercury -  This  contaminant  was
detected only in June  1979 in cat and
rodent feeds, both being lower than the
MAC  recommended by EPA.
  Arsenic - Arsenic appeared to be the
most variable of all contaminants across
feed types but none of the observations
exceeded the EPA MAC.
  Selenium  -  The chronological pro-
gression of this element showed sudden
and simultaneous elevation in all feeds,
followed by persistence and slow decay
during the period studied. The biological
significance of this incidence could not
be assessed.
  Malathion  - Ma lath ion was the most
stable and best controlled pesticide
residue in all diets tested.
  DDTs - DDTs were ubiquitous con-
taminants appearing in spikes at regular
frequency throughout the study, sug-
gesting seasonality.
  PCBs - Rodent diet, the most frequently
encountered intoxicological laboratories,
showed two instances of contamination.
Based on levels  obtained, it  is  our
conclusion that the contamfnation peaks
were not sufficient to alter liver function
in our animals. However,  PBCs are
known carcinogens and based on this
fact, we would have probably discarded
the contaminated lots  had we known
beforehand.
  Since electrical equipment containing
PCBs  is still  in use in  feed processing
plants, accidental spills are possible to
occur. Therefore, the need for pre-ad-
ministration surveillance  of PCB is
warranted.
  Aluminum - In view of our experiences
one cannot speculate as to the signifi-
cance of aluminum in animal feeds. The
highest observed level in rodent feed
was about 10-fold over the level one
might find in human  food  (oatmeal)
cooked in aluminum  pots. From the
analytical  data, it  is  not possible  to
discern in what chemical form aluminum
was present in animal  feed.
  Barium - The cardiovascular toxicity
of this element received considerable
attention,  especially   in  view  of   its
abundance in drinking water. Therefore,
feed  barium levels are of significant
interest to many researchers.
  An example of this concern emerged
in our laboratory when the rate  of
gastrointestinal absorption of naturally
occurring barium in drinking  water was
studied in rats. The study  had to be
repeated after the investigators realized
that the ambient feed levels interfered
with  the  interpretation,  since the rat
chow contained 2-5 times the amount
of barium that was present in the water
sample studied.
  Strontium  and Boron - Very little is
known about the potential impact of
these contaminants in the ppm range in
animal studies. The levels detected are
documented.

-------
The EPA author J. P. Bercz is with the Health Effects Research Laboratory,
  Cincinnati, OH 45268.
W. Emile Coleman is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Temporal Variability of Toxic Contaminants in
  A nimal Diets," (Order No. PB 81 -205 9 73; Cost: $8.00, subject to change) will
  be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Health Effects Research Laboratory
        U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati.  OH 45268
> U.S. GOVERNMENT HUNTING OFFICE: 1W1 -757-012/7225

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED
                                                                           PS   OOOOiM

-------