United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Health Effects Research
Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
Research and Development
EPA/600/S1 -85/006 May 1985
Project Summary
In  Vitro Microbiological
Mutagenicity  and  Unscheduled
DNA Synthesis  Studies of
Fifteen  Pesticides
Vincent  F. Simmon, Edward S. Riccio, Douglas E. Robinson, and
Ann D.  Mitchell
  Fifteen pesticides being reviewed as
part of the EPA Substitute Chemical
Program were examined by SRI Inter-
national by several In vitro test proce-
dures, for the following:

• Reverse mutation in Salmonella
  typhlmurium strains  TA1525,
  TA1537, TA98, and TA100 and in
  Escherichia coli WP2.
• Induction of mitotic recombination
  in the yeast Saccharomyces cere-
  visiae D3.
• Relative toxicity in DNA repair-pro-
  ficient and repair-deficient strains of
  E. coli (strains W311O and p3478.
  respectively) and of Bacillus subtilis
  (strains HI 7 and M45, respectively).
• Unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS)
  in human fibroblasts (WI-38 cells).

  None of the fifteen pesticides demon-
strated genetic activity in all six of the in
vitro assays. Bioallethrin was the only
pesticide that was mutagenic in the S.
typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
Manzate-D and manzate 200 increased
both mitotic recombination in S. cere-
visiae D3  and UDS in WI-38 cells.
Dithane M-22, dithane M-45, ethylchry-
santhemate, and zineb increased mitotic
recombination in S. cerevisiae D3. DL-
cis/trans chrysanthemic acid was geno-
toxic in the relative toxicity assay, being
more toxic to the repair-deficient (roc'}
B. subtilis strain M45 than to the repair-
proficient (rec*) strain HI 7.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Health Effects Research Lab-
oratory. Research Triangle Park, NC. to
announce key findings of the research
project that Is fully documented in a
separate report of the same title (see
Project Report ordering information at
back).

Introduction
  The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act designates the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) as
the  governmental body responsible for
the  safety of all pesticides used  in the
United States. More recently, the Federal
Environmental Pesticide Control Act (PL
92-516) strengthened EPA's regulatory
responsibilities in the area of pesticides
to include intra-  as well as  interstate
commerce.
  To be federally registered, a pesticide
must have been determined  not to be
hazardous to health or to the environ ment
when used according to its labeling
restrictions. Thus, in accordance with
new law as well as with specific directives
included in Public Law 93-135,  1973,
EPA is now conducting a thorough review
of the implications of using alternative
chemicals,  including older registered
pesticides, for pest control.
  In the pesticide review process, EPA
emphasizes the development of scientific
criteria for evaluating the  safety of com-
pounds substituted for those pesticides
found to be hazardous. In addition to
review and evaluation of the literature on

-------
pesticides and  maintenance of liaisoh
with industry and academia, the strategy
program  includes laboratory studies to
obtain additional data.  One of these
laboratory programs is directed toward
gathering mutagenesis data on a selected
number of compounds.
  EPA's program is responsive to one of
the recommendations included in the
President's Scientific Advisory Committee
Report of September  1973, Chemicals
and Health. In that document, the Com-
mittee recommended  that  "Regulatory
agencies should take steps to insure that
new scientific data raising the possibility
of new or extended hazards from chem-
icals in use are subject to careful process
of scientific review for merit interpreta-
tion."

Results and Discussion
  The results of the in  vitro microbio-
logical and UDS  assays  of the fifteen
compounds are summarized in Table 1. A
positive  response in  these assays  is
defined as a reproducible dose-related
increase  in the  effect being observed. A
genotoxic or mutagenic  effect  was ob-
served for eight of the fifteen pesticides
tested. The eight pesticides that had a
positive response in one or more of the
assays were bioallethrin,  DL-cis/trans
chrysanthemic  acid,  dithane M22, di-
thane M-45, ethylchrysanthemate, man-
zate-D, manzate 200, and zineb. None of
                  the pesticides tested were positive in all
                  six of the in vitro assays. Bioallethrin was
                  the only compound mutagenic  in the
                  Sa/mone//a/microsome  assay. Dithane
                  M-22,  dithane  M-45, ethylchrysanthe-
                  mate,  manzate-D,  manzate  200,  and
                  Zineb all increased mitotic recombination
                  in S. cerevisiae D3, but only manzate-D
                  and manzate 200 also induced unsched-
                  uled DNA synthesis in WI-38 cells. DL-
                  cis/ trans chrysanthemic acid was geno-
                  toxic in the B.  subtilis  relative toxicity
                  assay but was inactive in all other assays.
                  Dose-response curves are presented for
                  pesticides that give a positive response in
                  the assays except for ther relative toxicity
                  assays. Biphenyl, chlordimeform,  NRDC-
                  149, permethrin, polyram, resmethrin,
                  and sumithrin  were  not genotoxic  or
                  mutagenic in any of the six assays we
                  performed.

                  Microbiological A ssays
                     Each pesticide was tested at least twice
                  on separate days, using one plate per
                  dose. The first experiment was a test over
                  a wide  range of doses to look for toxicity or
                  mutagenicity. If no toxicity or mutagenic-
                  ity was observed, the second experiment
                  was conducted at higher concentrations.
                  If mutagenicity was observed, a dose re-
                  sponse was determined. An assay that
                  gave a mutagenic response was  always
                  repeated to confirm that the results were
                  reproducible.
Table  1.    In Vitro Mutagenesis: Summary Data for EPA Pesticides
      Pesticide
  Salmonella
 typhimurium
(His* Reversion)
-MA      +MA
  Escherichia
   coli WP2
(Try* Reversion)
-MA       +MA
Saccharomyces
 cerevisiae D3
    (Mitotic
Recombinants)
-MA       +MA
                                       Conclusions and
                                       Recommendations

                                         Our results indicate that none of th
                                       fifteen pesticides tested in Phase III wer
                                       mutagenic or genotoxic in all six of the/
                                       vitro  assays. Only two pesticides wer
                                       positive in more than one assay. The
                                       were manzate-D and manzate 200, whic
                                       increased  mitotic recombination in 6
                                       cerevisiae D3 and induced UDS in WI-3
                                       cells. Dithane M-22, dithane M-45, ethyl
                                       chrysanthemate, and zineb increase
                                       mitotic recombination. The Salmonella
                                       microsome assay detected mutageni
                                       activity in only one pesticide, bioallethrir
                                       No pesticide was found to be mutageni
                                       with E. coli WP2. DL-cis/trans chrysan
                                       themic acid was genotoxic in the relativi
                                       toxicity assay.
                                         It is recommended that the eight pesti
                                       cides that were positive  in  at least  on<
                                       assay be considered for further study t<
                                       characterize more completely their poten
                                       tial hazards to human  health. Although <
                                       mutagenic response does not mean that <
                                       chemical  is  harmful  to humans,  th<
                                       combination of six  separate-assay sys
                                       terns greatly enhances the probability o
                                       detecting  potentially  hazardous chemi
                                       cals.  It is apparent that no one assay ii
                                       uniquely capable of detecting the spec
                                       trum  of mutagenic events that differen
                                       chemical structures may cause.
Escherichia       Bacillus
   coli          subtilis        UDS
 (Relative        (Relative    (DNA Repair}
 Toxicity)        Toxicity)     -MA  +MA
Bioallethrin
Biphenyl
Chlordimeform
DL-c\s/trans
 Chrysanthemic
 acid
Dithane M-22
Dithane M-45
Ethylchrysan-
 themate
Manzate-D
Manzate 200
NRDC-149
Permethrin
Polyram
Resmethrin
Sumithrin
Zineb
Negative response. •; positive response, +.

-------
    Vincent F. Simmon, Edward S. Riccio, Douglas E. Robinson, and Ann D. Mitchell
      are with SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
    M. D. Waters is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
    The  complete report,  entitled "In Vitro Microbiological Mutagenicity and
      Unscheduled DNA Synthesis Studies  of Fifteen Pesticides," (Order No. PB
      85-193 761/AS; Cost: $17.5O, subject to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield. VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Health Effects Research Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, NC27711
                                       * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 196S-55M16/27083
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
        OCOC329    PS

-------