United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Health Effects
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S1-88/005 Jan. 1989
&EPA          Project  Summary

                    Behavioral Effects  of
                    Microwaves:  Relationship  of
                    Total  Dose  and  Dose  Rate
                    Mary Ellen O'Connor and Robert Strattan
                     The goal of this research was to
                   compare the  relationship  of whole
                   body averaged specific absorption
                   rate (SAR)  and specific absorption
                   (SA) to determine if dose rate or
                   dose was  a better predictor  of
                   biological effects. Sperm  positive
                   Long-Evans  female rats  were
                   exposed to 2450 MHz CW microwave
                   radiation  for  1-3  hours   at
                   approximately 10 W/kg. The  maternal
                   subjects were then  observed  for
                   natural delivery  of their litters.
                   Sensitivity to thermally  induced
                   seizures and  huddling were studied
                   in the offspring. Analyses  revealed
                   that there were  no statistically
                   significant  differences  between
                   exposed and control offspring on the
                   behavioral indices. The behavior did
                   not appear to  be effected by prenatal
                   exposure to microwave  radiation at
                   these  levels. The huddle  sizes
                   became smaller as the  pups aged
                   both in exposed and   control
                   offspring.
                      This Project   Summary  was
                   developed by EPA's Health Effects
                   Research  Laboratory,  Research
                   Triangle Park, NC,  to announce  key
                   findings of the research  project that
                   is fully  documented in  a  separate
                   report of the  same title (see Project
                   Report ordering information  at back).

                   Introduction
                      The purpose of the investigation was
                   to define the relationship  of  exposure
                   duration  and  average whole body
                   specific  absorption rate  (SAR)  of
                   continuous wave  (CW) radiofrequency
                   radiation  (RFR)  using biological
endpomts  The research was conducted
in two phases. In the first phase, female
Long-Evans rats were exposed at SARs
of 2, 4, 6, or 8 W/kg for durations of 1, 2,
3, 4,  5, or 6 hours. Subsequently,  CF-1
mice  were exposed at 2, 4,  and 8 W/kg
for durations of 1,2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 hours.
Colonic  temperatures  were taken
immediately  before and immediately
following each exposure session.
   In the second phase of the research
sperm-positive Long-Evans female
rats were exposed at SARs  of 10 W/kg
for durations  of 1 and 3  hours. The
exposures occurred on gestational  days
12 through 18. The maternal subjects
were  irradiated and  then observed for
natural delivery of their litters. The  pups
constituted  the  subject  pool  for
subsequent  behavioral  studies.  The
behavioral tests included sensitivity  to
thermally induced seizures  and huddle
size.

Experimental Procedures
   All maternal exposures occurred in a
Lmdgren 4-Shield  RFR  anechoic
chamber  The sham chamber  was
located adjacent to the  microwave
exposure facility and shared the same air
flow system with the anechoic chamber.
The temperature at the location of the
subject  differed by no more than 1°C
between  the  anechoic  and sham
chambers 2450-MHz  CW  microwave
radiation  was emitted from a horn
antenna mounted  on the ceiling of the
anechoic chamber. During exposure, the
animals  were placed  in  Plexiglas
cylindrical  containers  that  were
positioned on top of a bilayer styrofoam
platform. The pup seizures in the second

-------
phase were  performed using a  2450-
MHz circularly  polarized  waveguide
placed inside the sham chamber to
provide  ambient temperature   and
humidity control.
    The SAR was determined using twin
well calorimetry.  The  power settings for
the estimated range of masses  were
determined from measurements of the
temperature  change of equal masses of
Ringer's solution  in plastic bags  Animal
carcasses were then used to determine if
the selected  power levels  did  in  fact
produce equivalent SAR measurements.
In the second phase, the exposure levels
were  determined  using  a   pre-
established table for the desired SAR of
10 W/kg  based  upon  the  mass of the
maternal subject. The power  level  was
changed each day according to the body
mass in order to  provide a constant  SAR
throughout the exposure period
    The subjects  were female  Long-
Evans rats and  female  CF-1 mice from
the animal colony  at The  University of
Tulsa. The rats used in the first phase of
the study ranged from 64 to  100 days of
age while  the mice ranged from 56 to
133 days of  age  The  rats were  chosen
from the  available  animals  based  on a
body mass between 180 and 190 g while
the mice had body masses  between 28
and 30 g. The rats for the second phase
were primaparous  females  between 90
and  180  days of  age at  the time of
breeding. The day on  which  a sperm
plug was detected was considered Day 1
of gestation.
    The   schedule  for  obtaining
measurements at durations of  1,2, 3, 4,
5, or 6 hours for  each of the SAR levels
was determined randomly. Animals were
exposed singly and all of the exposures
were scheduled  such that the end of the
exposure occurred at the  same hour of
the day (15:00).  The  body mass  of the
animals available for exposure  was
measured between 8:00 and 9.00 h.
Colonic  temperatures  were   taken
immediately  prior to placing the animal in
the Plexiglas holder  for exposure  and
again at the  end  of the  exposure period.
In the first  phase, the rat  exposure
schedule  was  repeated three  times
resulting in three rats in each of the 24
conditions.   The mouse  exposure
schedule was repeated twice resulting in
two mice  in  each of  the  18 exposure
conditions.
    In  the second phase,  the  same
procedures were  followed for the 1 and 3
hour exposure periods. The exposures
began  on Day  12 of gestation  and
continued through Day 18. Each day, a 1
hour and a 3 hour exposure  session was
conducted.  Morning  and  afternoon
exposures  were counterbalanced  for
exposure  groups.  After the  exposure
session on Day  18, the  maternal subject
was placed in  a plastic maternity  cage
and monitored  until the day  of  birth of
the litter  At this  time  the pups  were
counted, weighed, and assigned to either
the seizure or huddle study.
    On day  two of  age the  pups  were
counted and all pups  in  a  litter  over
seven were chosen  randomly and  used
in  the seizure study.  The seizures  were
observed by placing the pup in a beaker
inside the circularly polarized  waveguide.
The pre-exposure  skin  temperature, the
post-exposure   skin  temperature,  the
condition of  the pup, and  the ambient
temperature were all recorded.
    The huddle sizes were measured at
5,  10, and 15 days of  age  On each of
the three days,  six pups were removed
from the home cage and  placed  in a
plastic test  cage. After a  15  minute
acclimation  period,  huddles  were
photographed  from  directly  overhead
using  a tripod-mounted  35  mm camera.
One  photograph was  taken  every  15
minutes until four photographs had  been
taken of each litter.  The  developed slides
were projected  onto  a  chalkboard  and
the outer circumference of the huddles
was traced onto a sheet of paper taped
to  the board. Two methods for measuring
the size of the  huddle  were  used   The
method termed perimeter  measures
traced the perimeter  of  the huddle as if
the pups were enclosed in a rubberband
resulting  in a  convex  polygon entirely
enclosing all pups  in the litter. The  other
measure is referred to  as the individual
pup  measure  and was obtained  by
tracing the circumference of  the huddle
including the outline  of the pup without
extended tails and  limbs.


Results and  Discussion
    In general  the  average temperature
change  (post-minus   pre-exposure
colonic temperature) for the exposed
Long-Evans  rats  reflected  increased
colonic  temperatures.   With   two
exceptions, (SAR 2W'kg for 4 or 5 hours)
the colonic temperature  increased during
the exposure.   For  a  given  SAR, the
temperature  change   did   not  vary
considerably as an effect of  duration of
exposure.  However, the sham exposed
rats  showed a decrease  in  colonic
temperature that  is  more  evident  for
longer exposure durations. Any exposure
longer than one  hour resulted  in a
colonic  temperature decrease  in the
sham exposed rats.
    The  correlation  between  pos
exposure colonic temperature  and  SA i
significant (r -  0 46, p <  0.0001) as i
the correlation  between post  exposur
colonic temperature  and SAR  (r = 0.75
p  <  0.0001). It  is of interest to note the
SAR is a  much  better  predictor of pos
exposure  temperature  in   the  ra
accounting for  62%  of  the  variance
While SA  is significant, it only account
for  21%  of the   variance. Of th
correlations  between  duration   o
exposure  and  post  exposure colom
temperature  at  each of the  four SAI
levels,  only  the  2  W/kg  condition wa
significant (r  =   -055,  p  <   001), an>
this correlation was negative.
    These same  comparisons  wer
made for the CF-1  mice. For duration
of exposure longer than  one or  two noun
all of the mice had  lower  post exposur
colonic temperatures  The   averag
temperature change  for the  shar
exposed mice also reflected a decrease
    The   post  exposure   coloni
temperature was not related significantl
to SA and was only mildly  related to SAI
(r  = 0.43, p <  0 005). The correlation
between  duration of exposure  and poj
colonic temperature were all negative an
only the 2 W/kg condition  was  significar
(r   =  -0 57, p <   0.03)   The  pos
exposure temperature was lower than th
pre-exposure temperature  for all but fiv
mice and  the relationship between pos
exposure temperature  and  duration  c
exposure (r  =  -057, p  < 00001)  a
well as  the  relationship  betwee
temperature change  and duration  c
exposure (r  =  -0.35, p  < 0.02) wer
significant.
    The  average for the whole  bod
average SAR was  10.45  W/kg (±  1.0
SD)  The  highest SAR value  was  12.
W/kg and the lowest was 8.5 W/kg. Dat
from 59 gravid  dams  were  used in  th
analyses;  18 cage control,  21   shar
exposed and 20  microwave exposed
    All treatment variables associate'
with  the  characteristics of the maternj
subjects  and  their  exposure as well  a
the variables associated  with   the litte
characteristics and  behavioral  measure
were analyzed  using  a  three  factc
analysis  of  variance.  Post   hoc  test
(Tukey HSD) were performed  only whe
a significant mam effect was followed  b
a significant interaction
    Although  the average mass  of  th
dams in  the different treatment group
did not differ,  there was a statistical!
significant difference in  the mass  game
from Day 1 through Day 18 (F  = 5 87, ,
< 001).  This difference was due to th
sham exposed groups gaming  more tha

-------
the microwave exposed groups. The
cage control group was  not different  in
weight  gain  from  either  the  sham
exposed or the  microwave  exposed
group.  Time of day  of  exposure  and
duration of exposure were not significant.
    As  expected,  the  microwave
exposed groups experienced an increase
in  colonic  temperature during  exposure.
There was a  significant difference  in
temperature change associated with all
three of the major variables:  exposure
condition  (F  =  289.98, p  <  0.001),
duration of exposure (F =  11.8, p  <
0.002), and time of day of exposure (F  =
4.21,  p  <   0.05).  The  average
temperature change for  the  microwave
exposed groups was  2.04°C. The sham
exposed groups had a decrease in tem-
perature with  an  average of -051°C.
The  one hour groups increased more
than the 3  hour groups while the morning
exposure groups increased  less than the
afternoon  Groups.  There  were  no
significant  interactions.
    Litter sizes for the pups at  birth were
not significantly different with averages  of
1122,  11.76,  and  1060 pups for the
cage control, sham   exposed  and
microwave exposed groups. Pups from
each litter  were selected for the seizure
study when they  were  2 days of age.
There were no differences for the mass
of  the  pups, the  pre-   and  post-
treatment skin   temperature,  the
difference  between the  post-  and pre-
treatment  skin  temperature or  the
average latency to seizure.
    Huddle sizes were analyzed on days
5,  10, and  15 of age.  Both the perimeter
measurement  (F = 3.51, p <  0 05) and
the individual   pup measurement  (F  =
40.42, p < 0001) produced  significant
differences based upon  the age of the
pups. Older  pups form smaller  and
smaller huddles.  The  proportion  of
variance  accounted for by the  two
measurement  techniques   was
calculatedusing the  efa2  method
suggested by  other  investigators  The
perimeter measure accounted for 8% of
the variance in huddle  size across the
three  age groups while the individual
measure accounted for 57%.


Conclusions and
Recommendations
    Under identical exposure conditions
and identical rates of energy deposition
(SAR) the thermal response as measured
by colonic  temperature is dramatically
different for the mouse and the rat.  Mice
actually decrease their body temperature
while  being dosed with energy at  2, 4,
and 8  W/kg even when the duration of
exposure is as long as 6  hours.  The
thermal response  of the  microwave
exposed mice is not distinguishable from
that  of sham  exposed  mice  when
measured by colonic temperature.
    The rats did not  display this efficient
thermal regulation of body temperature
under  these  conditions of exposure.
Levels of radiation at 2, 4, 6, and 8  W/kg
raised body  temperature  to  a given
degree and the rats maintained  this
increased temperature for  durations of
exposure as  long  as 6  hours Sham
exposed rats showed a reduction in  body
temperature at all durations of exposure
greater than one hour.
    The use of colonic temperature as
an indication  of thermal  responsivity
results in opposite  results  in  sham
exposed  and microwave exposed  rats
but does not indicate differences in sham
and microwave exposed mice. Such  a
dramatic species  difference  under
identical laboratory  exposure conditions
argues for extreme caution  in attempting
to generalize to  human exposure
conditions. In particular, biological effects
observed  in  only  one  non-human
species should  be used in establishing
human exposure conditions only when
the procedure allows for the inclusion  of
considerable caveats  regarding the  lack
of essential data. The  procedure  should
also ensure  that these caveats will be
included in the tables or figures used by
practitioners  in attempting to abide by a
recommendation.
    In  phase 2 there  were  significant
differences  in weight gain between the
microwave and  sham exposed maternal
subjects. However, this  difference  was
not accompanied by differences in either
litter size or pup mass.
    The results  of the second  phase
indicated that post-natal  measures  of
thermally induced seizure  sensitivity  or
huddle size  in  pre-natally  exposed rat
pups were  not  significantly effected by
the microwave exposure at  10 W/kg.  Two
measures were used to determine huddle
size.  The  age  of  the  pups  was  a
significant variable and  the proportion  of
variance accounted for was much greater
for one of the two measures. Behavioral
research  often  demonstrates  the
importance  of  operational  definitions  in
which  variables and  procedures  are
defined by the methods  used to measure
them.  Like  species differences,  the
importance  of  operational  definitions  in
laboratory research and its interpretation
is a basic experimental  principle learned
by  most investigators in  the most
elementary  research methods  courses.
However, bioelectromagnetics research is
replete with  investigations relying on one
species  and  one   experimental
measurement technique.  Some  of the
ambiguities  in  the data  base  might be
explained  by  these  two   basic
experimental principles.

-------
   Mary Ellen O'Connor and Robert Strattan are with The University of Tulsa, Tulsa,
        OK 74104.
   Ezra Barman is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "Behavioral Effects of Microwaves: Relationship of
        Total  Dose  and Dose  Rate,"  (Order No.  PB 89-118 6401 AS; Cost:
        $15.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield,  VA22161
            Telephone:   703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Health Effects Research Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
BULK-RAT^-
   ;-&-F
   EPA
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S1-88/005
              0000329
                                       IL   60604

-------