SEPA
                               United States
                               Environmental Protection
                               Agency
                               Environmental Sciences Research
                               Laboratory
                               Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                               Research and Development
                               EPA-600/S2-80-203  Mar. 1981
Project Summary
                               Metal Particulate  Emissions
                               from  Stationary  Sources

                               Volume 2.  Characterization  of
                               Collection  Filters
                                The literature on filtration theory
                               and  past experimental  work  was
                               reviewed and critiqued with regard to
                               the needs of EPA relative to stationary
                               source sampling. A laboratory evalua-
                               tion of aerosol collection efficiency
                               and flow resistance of filters potential-
                               ly useful in EPA sampling programs
                               was designed with respect to several
                               variables, including  particle  size
                               (0.05,~0.1 and 0.5 um mass median
                               diameter - MMD); gas velocity (4,12.
                               30, 83 and 126 cm/sec);  and aerosol
                               composition  and density (g/cm3) -
                               dioctyl phthalate (OOP) 1.0, sodium
                               chloride (NaCI) 2.17, beryllium sulfate
                               (BeSO4  2H2O) 2.36, lead nitrate
                               [(Pb(NO3)2] 4.53, and cadmium iodide
                               (Cdl2)  5.67. Filter collection
                               efficiencies were measured for the
                               various evaluation parameters with a
                               DOP penetrometer  or sodium flame
                               photometer.  With  two  exceptions,
                               collection efficiencies of greater than
                               99 percent were obtained for all filters
                               and test conditions. The  exceptions,
                               tested with  0.3  um MMD  NaCI
                               aerosol,  were Millipore Mitex and
                               Whatman 41 filters, with collection
                               efficiencies of  75 to  50 percent,
                               respectively. The other membrane
                               filters (Millipore AA and Fluoropore)
                               exhibited high flow resistance at 30
                               and 83 cm/sec and could not be
                               tested at higher flow rates.
                                This Project Summary was devel-
                               oped by EPA's Environmental Sciences
                               Research  Laboratory, Research
                               Triangle Park. NC. to announce key
                               findings of the research project that is
                               fully documented in a separate report
                               of the same title (see Project Report
                               ordering information at back).
                               Introduction
                                The objective of this phase of work
                               under EPA Contract No. 68-02-1219, is
                               to  identify filter  media having
                               acceptable properties for the efficient
                               collection  of particles  containing
                               potentially hazardous metals for the
                               following  range  of conditions
                               encountered in stack sampling:

-------
Variable
Particle size

Gas velocity

Particle composition and
  density (g/cm3)

Temperature
Electrostatic charge

Aerosol concentration and
  filter loading

Gas pressure and composition

Gas humidity
0.05, 0.1-0.2 and 0.5 /jm MMD

4, 12, 30, 83 and 126 cm/sec
 OOP (1.0), NaCI (2.17),
(2.36), PbN03 (4.53) and Cdl2 (5.67)

Pretreatment at 500°C (effects of high
temperature exposure is measured rather
than efficiency at high temperature)

Not evaluated (aerosol charge neutralized)

Not to be varied. Convenient concentrations
and clean filters will be used.

Not to be varied. Ambient air will be used.

Not to be varied. Dry air will be used.
  This report also presents a review of
the following filter characteristics to aid
in the selection of the most promising
type for stack sampling:
Media
Composition
Type
 Millipore AA
 Millipore Fluoropore FA
Gelman Spectro Grade
  (without silicone treatment)

Mine Safety Appliance Co.
  1106BH
mixed cellulose ester


teflon-polypropylene


glass


glass
 membrane (0.8
 micron pore size)

 membrane (1 micron
 pore size)

 fiber
 fiber
Arthur D. Little/Balston
"Microquartz"
Millipore Mitex
Whatman 41
quartz
teflon
cellulose
fiber
membrane (10
micron pore size)
fiber
  A collection efficiency of at least 99
percent  for  the  hazardous  metal
containing   paniculate  was  deemed
adequate.
Conclusions
  Several types of filters suitable for
stack  sampling were  evaluated  for
aerosol collection  efficiency and flow
resistance.  From  this  work,  the
following conclusions can be drawn:

•  Filter media including MSA 1106 BH,
   Gelman Spectro Grade (without sili-
   cone),   Arthur   D.  Little/Balston
   Microquartz,  Millipore  AA   and
         Millipore  Fluoropore  FA  have
         collection efficiencies greater than
         99 percent for the following ranges
         of conditions.

          Aerosols: 0.3 ,um OOP and NaCI,
          BeSCv4H2O, Cdl2 and Pb (N03)2.

          Sizes: 0.03 to 1.3 /urn MMD with
          geometric standard deviations of
          1.4 to 1.9.

          Flow rate: 12 to  125 cm/sec.

         The membrane-type filters, Millipore
         AA and  Fluoropore FA,  exhibited
         high flow resistance at 30 and 83
         cm/sec,  respectively  (i.e., 78 and
                          114 mm Hg) and could not be test(
                          at  higher flows.

                       • Within the limits of measuremer
                          sensitivity, there was no different
                          in  efficiency for variations in aerosi
                          density (1.0 to 5.7 g/cm3) or size (0.
                          to  1.3 yum MMD).

                       • Millipore  Mitex  membrane  an
                          Whatman 41 cellulose  fiber filtei
                          with  efficiencies of 75  and 5
                          percent  (for  0.03  /am   NaCI)  ar
                          unsuitable  for  stack  samplin
                          applications.

                         In general, the filter media tested (e:
                       cepting Millipore  Mitex and Whatma
                       41)  have  adequate collectio
                       efficiencies   for   the   collection  i
                       particles containing hazardous metal
                       Other factors (such as thermal stabili
                       and  background  levels  of trac
                       elements) may influence  filter selei
                       tion  for a  particular  stack  samplir
                       application.
 Recommendations
  Areas in which further work is recod
 mended include the following:

•  Measure  filter efficiencies for
   selected  particulate  challenj
   sample as a  function of prior filt
   loading, aerosol  charge  and  g<
   humidity.

•  Measure the utility of organic men
   brane filters at temperatures of 121
   150°C for  times up to two  hours,
   simulation  of  stationary  soure
   sampling. For example, the  test filti
   could be backed up by a quartz filti
   maintained at ambient temperatur
   nitric  acid digestion and atom
   absorption  spectrophotometr
   analysis of the metal component i
   the particulate challenge for the tw
   filters would  provide a measure i
   efficiency.

•  Carry out efficiency measuremen
  for trace levels of hazardous met
   particulate (10-100 A*g/m3) in tl-
  presence  of  typical   levels  <
  particulate  emissions  froi
  stationary  sources (20-200 mg/m
  to determine if there is a preferenti.
  penetration  of  hazardous  met
  particulate   during  particulal
  sampling.

-------
•  Screen candidate  filters for their
   suitability  in  carrying  out  trace
   hazardous metals analysis by various
   analytical methods, including x-ray
   fluorescent  analysis  and   atomic
   absorption spectrophotometry.
   This Project Summary was authoredbythe Staff of the Center for Environmental
    Research Information. USEPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
   Roy L. Bennett is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "Metal Paniculate Emissions from Stationary
    Sources: Volume 2.  Characterization  of Collection Filters,"  (Order No.
    PB 81-121 154; Cost: $8.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
          Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                                                       > U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1961-757-012/7007

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
    r
         Region 5 Library
         US  EPA
          230 Sť Dearborn St.
          Chicago, IL  60604

-------