United States
                                 Environmental Protection
                                 Agency
                                  Industrial Environmental Research
                                  Laboratory
                                  Cincinnati OH 45268
&EPA
                                 Research and Development
                                  EPA-600/S2-82-012 August 1982
Project Summary
                                 The Effect  of Total Water
                                 Reuse and  Alum  Control on
                                 First  Pass Retention
                                 Michael D. Strutz
                                  The escalating cost of raw materials,
                                 coupled with more stringent effluent
                                 limitations, have led papermakers to
                                 consider wet end chemistry optimiza-
                                 tion as a solution to these problems.
                                 They have also become aware of the
                                 possible benefits to be derived from
                                 increased Whitewater reuse. While
                                 certain construction paper and paper-
                                 board manufacturers have used total
                                 water reuse to solve their problems,
                                 other categories of paper manufactur-
                                 ing  have not been so successful.
                                 Product quality deterioration, caused
                                 by  poor wet end control and  the
                                 resulting build up of dissolved inorganic
                                 and organic contaminants, have ham-
                                 pered achieving complete water reuse.
                                 A previous study at Miami University,
                                 dealing with fine paper complete
                                 water reuse, cited the control of first
                                 pass retention as the key to a success-
                                 ful total water reuse strategy.
                                  By using  pulp-derived dissolved
                                 organic material as a variable, the
                                 current study makes use of a dynamic
                                 retention/drainage jar to show the
                                 negative effects of these compounds
                                 on retention. The negative effects can
                                 be overcome by controlling the alum
                                 concentration to satisfy the  cationic
                                 demand which this material exhibits.
                                 Excessively high alum concentrations,
                                 however, are shown in the study to de-
                                 crease retention in a system where a
                                 high molecular weight cationic poly-
                                 mer was used. Controlling alum con-
                                 centrations will  reduce the negative
                                 effects of dissolved organics in closed
                                 systems and achieve maximum effi-
                                 ciency from costly polymer retention
                                 aids.
                                   Interferences to the alum titration
                                 technique for measuring alum in
                                 Whitewater samples were investigat-
                                 ed. Iron and pulp-derived organic
                                 material were found to  interfere
                                 slightly with  the method, causing
                                 higher results than the actual alum
                                 concentration in the sample. However,
                                 the method was found to be suitable
                                 for control purposes.
                                   Various  levels of pulp-derived or-
                                 ganic material tended to hold zeta
                                 potential at zero over a wide range of
                                 alum concentrations. This phenome-
                                 non occurred at organic concentrations
                                 above approximately 200 ppm. This
                                 factor should be taken into considera-
                                 tion when using zeta potential as a wet
                                 end optimization parameter.
                                   A retention control strategy for total
                                 water reuse is proposed. It is based on
                                 the measurement and manipulation of
                                 alum concentrations  in the  stock
                                 chest, in low shear systems where no
                                 polymer is used  — to control the
                                 electrokinetic balance for proper
                                 coagulation, and in high shear systems
                                 where polymers are used — to eliminate
                                 the negative effects due to alum/poly-
                                 mer interactions.
                                   This Project Summary was developed
                                 by EPA's Industrial Environmental
                                 Research Laboratory, Cincinnati. OH,
                                 to announce  key findings of the
                                 research project that is fully  docu-
                                 mented in a separate report of the same
                                 title (see Project Report ordering
                                 information at back).

-------
Introduction

  The pulp and paper industry is facing
the implementation of stricter effluent
limitations proposed by the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency. By 1984, the
industry may be  required to reduce its
effluent discharge of Biochemical
Oxygen Demand and Total Suspended
Solids from current levels. In meeting
the previous Best Practicable Treatment
Technology regulations, industry en-
vironmentalists  recognized  the cost-
effectiveness of in-process recycle/
reuse techniques for reducing effluent
loadings. In fact, many  mills  in several
subcategories of  the  industry have
implemented total water reuse strategies
for the  complete elimination of their
discharge. It is the purpose  of this
research to investigate the possibility of
total water reuse in the non-integrated
fine  paper su beat ego ry, specifically in
the manufacture of a high opacity offset
grade.
  Miami  University investigated  a
totally closed Whitewater system during
the production  of  an offset grade in
19771. The  buildup of  dissolved  and
suspended solids  in the Whitewater
system was monitored  over a 96-hour
period. Paper samples were collected at
regular  intervals during the trial  and
various quality analyses were performed.
The  study concluded  that  problems
would  arise  in  the areas  of sizing,
brightness reversion,  and first pass
retention.  The authors  recommended
that these problems could be controlled
by optimizing  wet end chemistry,
thereby controlling first pass retention.
By computer simulation, they observed
that this strategy would, in turn,
eliminate the sizing and brightness
reversion problems. The key  is control-
ling retention.
  In the study of retention, it has been
observed that small amounts of dissolved
organic  material  can  decrease  the
effectiveness of cationic retention aids.
These dissolved materials can be lignin,
hemicellulose, fatty and resin acids, or
lignosulfonic  acids. Their presence in
the  papermaking  system  causes a
higher cationic  demand, thereby  in-
creasing the amount of cationic retention
aid required to reach optimum floccula-
tion. According to classical electrokinetic
theory,  the buildup of  dissolved inor-
ganic materials  in closed Whitewater
systems would decrease the  amount of
cationic retention aid required to reach
optimum flocculation. This was shown
to be true by Unbehend2 using mono-
valent  and divalent cations,  such as
sodium chloride and magnesium chloride.
  Dissolved  organic and  inorganic
materials in the system can be consid-
ered controlled or uncontrolled variables
from a process control standpoint.
Those materials coming into the system
from the raw water or raw materials are
generally considered not controllable. A
process control variable such as alum,
however, may become uncontrolled in a
closed system. That is, if the concentra-
tion of alum in the system is not closely
watched, a situation may develop where
retention is adversely affected. Avery3
demonstrated this by decreasing the
alum concentration in a system using
cationic starch. Retention on the
machine was significantly improved.
This same phenomenon has also been
shown to occur with  synthetic organic
retention aids.  Excessive amounts  of
these retention aids in  the system will
also cause  stock dispersion  and poorer
retention4.
  It becomes increasingly clear from the
previous  discussion that the control  of
retention will become more complicated
in a total closed system. In the  1977
machine trial  at Miami University,
dissolved organic and inorganic solids,
as well as alum, continued  to build up
during the run. Based on this information,
the objectives of the current study are:
to determine how the alum demand
changes under wet  end  conditions
found  in a totally closed  system;  to
determine if the higher concentrations
of dissolved organic  and inorganic
solids  will  interfere with  the  alum
titration measurement  technique; and
to investigate alum control as a  tech-
nique to improve retention  in a totally
closed system.

Phase I - Bench Scale
Retention Analyses
  A series of experiments was performed
to observe the effects of  dissolved
organics, dissolved inorganics, alum, and
shear on the retention of fines in a vaned
Dynamic Retention/Drainage Jar5.  A
76  micron,  14.5% open area electro
deposited nickel screen  was used in the
jar. The furnish used  is shown in Table
1. A 33 factorial design was  used at the
low shear  level,  300  revolutions per
minute (r.p.m.),  and two  23 factorial
experiments were performed at the
medium and high shear levels (600 and
900 r.p.m.). All experiments were
performed at room temperature and pH
4.50 ± 0.02 units. The pH was adjusted
using HCI or NaOH. The levels for the
independent variables are shown  ir
Table 2. Dissolved  inorganics  were
treated  cumulatively as the total  o
various  levels of calcium, magnesium,
manganese, and iron  derived frorr
observations during a previous totall\
closed  machine  run. The individual
levels for the dissolved inorganics are
shown in Table 3. The dissolved organics
used  in the study were obtained  by
beating  bleached kraft fiber, filtering ofl
the  solids,  and concentrating the
dissolved organic material in the filtrate
using reverse osmosis.  The levels  of
dissolved organics used  correspond
approximately to levels of volatile
dissolved solids  measured  during  a
previous closed  machine run  on this
paper grade.
 Effect  of  Organics
   Figure 1 shows the data plotted at the
 low dissolved inorganic level  and the
 negative effect of increasing concentra-
 tions of dissolved organics on retention.
 At 1 % alum, 300 r.p.m., and 1100 ppm
 organics, the decrease in retention was
 approximately 24%. The effect at 600
 r.p.m. was about 6% and at 900 r.p.m.
 there was no significant  decrease in
 retention (95% confidence limits for all
 the data was ± 3.4%) The fines retention
 at 600 r.p.m. was 35%, whereas at 900
 r.p.m. it was about 25%.

 Effect  of  Inorganics
   Figure 2 shows two distinctly different
 effects  from increasing levels of dis-
 solved inorganics. At the low dissolved
 organic level, an increase in the level of
 dissolved inorganics causes a decrease
 in retention, while at the medium and
 high levels, adding the dissolved inor-
 ganics causes an increase in retention.
 Although the zeta potential results  do
 not correlate perfectly with the results
 obtained, a general relationship can be
 observed. That  is,  depending on the
 initial zeta potential of the system, the
 addition of dissolved organic or inorganic
 compounds may cause either an increase
 or decrease in retention. Adding dis-
 solved inorganics to a system exhibiting
 a  positive  zeta potential will  cause a
 decrease in retention, whereas adding
 them to a system exhibiting a negative
 zeta potential will cause an increase in
 retention. This would agree with clas-
 sical electrokinetic theory which states
 that maximum coagulation  occurs  at
 zero zeta potential.

 Effect  of Alum
   Figure 1   illustrates how the  alum
 demand of the system changes according

-------
Table 1.    Experimental Furnish

Component              	
                                                            % 
-------
   90


   80


   70


* 60


   50
.o
|
  30


  20


   10


    O
        +26
                             Legend

                            ®  0 ppm organics

                            &  550 ppm organics
                            (3  1100 ppm organics


                             Note:  All data @ 300 R.P.M., pH 4.5. 1% alum


                             Zeta potential, in millivolts,  adjacent to data point
       Low                       Medium

                  Dissolved organics, relative concentration
                                                               High
 Figure 2.  Effects of organic and inorganic concentrations on retention.
  90


  80


  70


  60
.
I50

I
  40
  30


  20


  10
                   -10
                                                                      0
       -20
                   -10m Note: Alldata @ 30°. R-P-M., pH4.5, 1100ppm
                               organics, low inorganic cocentration

                               Zeta potential, in millivolts, adjacent
                               to data point
                               Legend

                               ® Fines retention

                               • Ash retention
                          10         15         20
                            Alum concentration, %
                                                          25
                                                                      30
 Figure 3.  Effects of alum concentration and Zeta potential on ash and fines retention.

                                  4
                                                                               of fines  and  ash decreases. \l  i
                                                                               apparent from a papermaking point o
                                                                               view that the retention of fines and asl
                                                                               takes precedence and alum should bi
                                                                               controlled on that basis.
Effect of Dissolved Organics or
Zeta Potential
  In the previous experiments, many o
the data points, particularly the pointsa
the  intermediate and high dissolve!
organic  levels, exhibited zero zeti
potential.  Separate experiments wen
conducted to determine if this pheno
menon was characteristic of a systerr
containing  quantities of dissolvee
organic material. Various quantities o
this  material were added to  a  typica
furnish, the fiber  was filtered off, anc
the zeta potential of the fines determined
Figure 4  shows  the results of this
experiment which was conducted with
distilled  water. Figure 5 shows the
results of the same experiment conduct
ed with tap water.
  In both cases, tap water and distillec
water, similar curves were  obtainec
using alum and no organic material. The
charge on the particles changed frorr
negative to positive at approximately 2%
alum. The curve peaked at about +15
mV zeta potential then steadily decreaseo
with further increases in alum concen-
tration.  This phenomenon  has been
previously illustrated in the literature6
and  has been attributed to formation ol
aluminum hydroxide and the increasing
sulfate ion buildup.
  Figure 4  also  illustrates  that the
increase  in the  dissolved organic
material in the sample has the effect of
suppressing the  zeta potential  and
increasing the alum demand, i.e., the
amount  of alum required to reach zero
zeta potential. The suppression of the
zeta potential can also be seen in Figure
5. This  phenomenon  seems to be
characteristic of the organic material and
not  of aluminum  hydroxide formation
and sulfate ion buildup. There seems to
be a point around 200 ppm  of organics
where the charge on the particles will
not  reverse,  i.e.,  will  not  become
positive. It is theorized that a neutrally
charged  organic polymer  is being
formed  and is coating the particle
surface. This effect, coupled with
neutrally charged aluminum hydroxide
formation and sulfate ion  buildup, is
creating a  stable,  neutrally charged
structure resistant to charge reversal. It
is acting in a similar manner in which
starch forms a protective colloid.

-------
 +20


 + /0
3-20
*
j
 -30


 -40


 -50
                   Legend
                   ©  0 pp/n organics

                   A  //O ppm organics

                   (3  220 ppm organics


                   Note; All data @ pH 4.5, in distilled water.
                          10        15          20
                            Alum concentration, %
                                                          25
30
Figure 4.  Effects of organic and alum concentration on Zeta potential in
          distilled water.
   +50
   +40
                      Note: All data @ pH 4.5 in tap water.
   -30
                       Legend
                          Alum, Oppm organics
                          Aluminum chloride, 0 ppm organics
                          Alum. 220 ppm organics
                          Aluminum chloride. 220 ppm organics
o
0
5
21.4
Alum concentration* %
42.8 64.2 85.6
Aluminum Concentration, ppm
25
107.0
30
128.4
Figure 5.  Effects of organic and alum concentration on Zeta potential in tap water.
  These results make one question the
usefulness of zeta potential even in this
purely ionic system. It would be benefi-
cial at low alum levels, i.e., below the
isoelectric point, but would lose signifi-
cance as a control tool at higher levels.

Effect of Polymer
  Two experiments were conducted to
test the hypothesis that the decrease in
retention  observed during the 1977
closed machine run at Miami University
was caused by the effect of high alum
concentrations on the  effectiveness of
the cationic polymer retention aid which
was used. These two experiments were
conducted with a high molecular weight
cationic acrylamide copolymer (Hercules,
Inc. Reten 210). The furnish contained
30%  ash  in  the  form of filler clay;
otherwise, it  was the same  as the
experimental  furnish  previously used.
Two shear levels,  300 and 600 rpm's,
were  investigated.
  Figure 6 shows the results at the low
shear level,  300  rpm. The retention
curve  for  the  "no polymer" situation
shows a  characteristic trend with
retention increasing sharply and reach-
ing a peak at 86%, with additional alum
not resulting  in any further increases.
Retention  levels off at approximately
85%.  For the situation where polymer is
used at 0.05% on  fiber, the results are
much different. Retention is best at 0%
alum  and continually decreases  at
higher alum concentrations, from a
maximum fines retention at 98% atO%
alum, to  a low of 65% at 20% alum.
Retention  with the polymer is consis-
tently  worse than without the polymer at
alum concentrations above about 5% on
fiber.  Alum  evidently  has a negative
effect on the bridging retention mecha-
nism  of the polymer.
  Figure 7 shows the experimental
results  at the higher  shear level,
600 rpm. The same decreasing trend in
retention with the polymer is evident
with the magnitude of the effect being
much greater. Retention decreased
from a maximum of 85% at 0% alum, to
a minimum of about 15% at 30% alum.
With  no  polymer, retention peaked at
30% at 4% alum, and showed a gradual
decreasing trend with  increasing alum
concentrations.

Phase II • Alum Titration
Method Interference Analysis
  The series of experiments conducted
during Phase I illustrated the fact that
the alum demand of the system changes
according  to the chemistry of the wet

-------
  700
   90
   80
   70

 c
£
   60
   50
   40
    30
    20
With high molecular weight cationic polymer
A Dynamic retention/drainage jar, polymer @ 0.05%
• Dynamic retention/drainage jar, no polymer
A Pilot paper machine, polymer @ 0.05%
                                   10
                            Alum, % on fiber
                                                                20
Figure 6.  Retention vs. alum with and without cationic polymer (low shear/.
end, at least at the low shear levels. It
was hypothesized that any compound in
the system besides alum might present
the possibility of  interfering with the
flouride titration either by reacting with
the fluoride (a positive interference), or
by reacting with the alum and making it
inaccessible to the fluoride (a negative
interference). The  objective of this
phase was to determine whether or not
the concentrations of dissolved inorganic
and organic compounds expected to be
found in  totally closed systems would
interfere with the titration.
  A series of simple comparison experi-
ments were conducted holding the alum
concentration constant at a low level
                        (100 ppm) and the suspected interfering
                        compounds at high levels. The interfer-
                        ences investigated were organics, iron,
                        calcium, magnesium and  manganese.
                        Each experiment was  replicated five
                        times.
                          Table 4 shows the average difference
                        associated with each variable. In the
                        case  of  the  organic concentrate and
                        iron,  a positive interference of 19 ppm
                        and 5 ppm was observed. If both were
                        present, an interference of 24 ppm  as
                        alum may result from their presence in
                        the sample.  Therefore,  if this sample
                        had been  taken from the headbox  of
                        machine operating of 0.5% consistency,
                        the titration would have predicted
approximately one  half of a percent
more alum than was actually present.
The interference due to iron was due to
the greater affinity to fluoride, having a
higher charge density  than  the other
inorganic  ions evaluated. The organic
concentrate used for the study  also
contained  a substantial  quantity of
metal ions,  especially calcium,  which
could possibly explain the positive
interference which it exhibited.
  From a process control point of view,
the titration is sufficiently accurate to
enable monitoring and control of alum,
based on  the parameters used  in this
study. The papermaker should be aware
of possible interferences  in their
particular system and  screen  any
additives  for possible  interference to
allow proper interpretation  of results
from the titration.

Summary and Conclusion
  In developing a wet end optimization
strategy for total water reuse, a paper-
maker should consider how a particular
retention control strategy will ultimately
affect paper quality  and  machine
runability.  Porwal7 has  shown the
contribution of alum to scale problems
on  machine wires.  Other  researchers
have shown how excessive alum
concentrations can adversely affect the
action rf  synthetic organic  retention
aids. This  study has demonstrated how
excessive  alum  concentrations alone
will adversely affect retention. Work is
continuing at Miami University on how
excessive  alum  concentrations  will
affect paper quality.
  From  a  retention point of view, the
following  conclusions  can be  drawn
from this study:
  1. In  a  totally closed system, some
     means  of controlling  the alum
     concentration  will be necessary.
     This  will involve measuring the
     concentration  of alum prior to its
     point of addition,  and making
     adj ustments to the addition rate to
     maintain the  proper quantity of
     alum in the system. The optimum
     alum level will vary with system
     conditions.
  2. In a totally closed system, the
     buildup of dissolved  organic and
     inorganic compounds may  or may
     not  adversely affect  retention
     depending on the relative concen-
     tration of each. The  negative
     effects of  increasing organic
     concentrations can  be overcome
     by properly adjusting  the alum
     level, or they may be overcome  if

-------
  80
   70
   60
   50
 c
 o

  30
   20
   10
600 RPM
4.50 pH
                        10                 20
                          Alum, % on fiber
                           30
Figure 7.  Retention vs. alum 1ith and without cationic polymer (medium shear).

Table4.    Alum Titration Interferences
Substance (ppm)                            Average Difference
	  	               Volume Titrant (mis)      Alum Equivalent (ppm)
Organic concentrate (1 WO)
Iron (14)
Calcium (130)
Magnesium (40)
Manganese (5)
 +0.138
 +0.034
   0
   0
   O
+ 19
+ 5
  0
  0
  0
    parameter and may cause a false
    interpretation of where theoptimum
    alum concentration occurs.
  4. At  high shear levels,  polymer
    retention aids will be required to
    achieve satisfactory retention.
    Computer simulation  of the data
    collected during the 1977 machine
    trial at Miami University predicted
    25% ash retention as being satis-
    factory. Ash retention  levels at
    medium and high shear levels
    during  the  current  study were
    below 25%. Alum levels in polymer
    systems should be closely watched,
    especially where cationic polymers
    are being used, to achieve maximum
    retention benefits, based on the
    data collected during this study.
  5. For control purposes, the alum
    titration, using a fluoride selective-
    ion electrode, is sufficiently accu-
    rate based on the variables consid-
    ered during this study. The paper-
    maker should be aware of possible
    interferences in  their particular
    system  and screen any additives
    for possible interference to allow
    proper  interpretation of results
    from the titration.


Material and  Methods
  One experiment tested the filtration
concentration and chemical analysis of
ten kilograms of bleached kraft  pulp.
The results are shown  in Table 5. The
data shows  that carbohydrates repre-
sent approximately 23% by  weight of
the identified organic material. Xylans
account for over 80% of this fraction.
Uronic  acids are the next largest
fraction  at  2.78%  followed by acid
insoluble lignm  and acid soluble lignin
at approximately 2% each. Of the
inorganic material identified, calcium
represents the largest fraction at 6.3%
by weight followed  by sodium at 3%.
These two elements represent almost
85% of the identified inorganic material
in the sample. About 40% of the organic
material and 19%  of the  inorganic
material remains unidentified. Addition-
al analytical work is being performed to
account for this  material.
    other inorganics build up in the
    system  in  appropriate  amounts.
    The  particular organic/inorganic
    balance in  the system should be
    recognized  prior to alum addition.
    Zeta potential may be measured
    for this purpose if organic concen-
    trations are not excessively high.
      3. When  using zeta potential  as
         retention optimization parameter,
         the papermaker should be careful
         not to equate a zero reading with
         optimum conditions in the wet
         end. The level of dissolved pulp-
         derived material has a significant
         effect on the measurement of that
                 References
                 1.  Heller, P., Scott, W.E., and Springer,
                    Under Conditions of Complete Water
                    Reuse" TAPPI 62(12):79-84 (1979)
                 2.  Unbehend,  J.E., "Mechanisms of
                    Soft  and Hard  Floe Formation in
                    Dynamic  Retention Measurement"
                    TAPPI 59(10):74-77 (1976)
                                                                               . S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1982/659 -095/540

-------
     3. Avery, L.P., "Evaluation of Retention
       Aids - The Quantitative Alum Analysis
       of a Papermaking Furnish and the
       Effect of Alum on Retention" TAPPI
       62(2):43-46(1979)
     4. Beck., U.,  et al., "Theoretical and
       Practical Contributions to the Elucida-
       ation of Retention Problems" Woc-
       henblatt Fur Papierfabrikation 105
       (11/12):391-398 (June 1977)
     5. Britt, K.W., "The Fines Fraction of
       Paper Stock" TAPPI  CA Report No.
       57:89-97(1975)
     6. Lindstrom,  T., and  Soremark, C.
       "Electrokinetic  Aspects  of Internal
       Rosin-Sizing" Svensk Papperstidning
       Nr. 1:22-28(1977)
     7. Porwal, S.K., Springer A., and
       Proctor, A., "Scale Deposits  on the
       Fourdrinier Wire of a Fine-Paper
       Machine" TAPPI 63(6):67-69
       (1980)
         TableS.    Organic Concentrate Analysis
         Compound
          Weight (%)
         Acid Insoluble (Klason) Lignin
         Acid Soluble Lignin
         Total Carbohydrate
             Araban
             Xylan
             Mannan
             Galactan
             Glucan
         Uronic Acid
         Oleic Acid
         Linoleic Acid
         Tetrachloroguaiacol
         Chloride
         Sulfate
         Aluminum
         Calcium  .
         Iron
         Magnesium
         Manganese
         Sodium
         Ash I550°C)
         Unidentified
             2.085
             1.950
            22.750
             1.150
            18.400
             0.650
             1.000
             1.550
             2.780
             0.003
             0.001
             0.033
             0.192
             0.020
             0.301
             6.300
             0.394
             0.288
             0.03 J
             3.030
            30.100
            59.842
                                               Michael D. Strutz is with Miami University. Oxford, OH 45056.
                                               Paul de Percin is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
                                               The complete report, entitled "The Effect of Total Water Reuse and A lum Control
                                                 on First Pass Retention," (Order No. PB 82-231 309; Cost: $10.50, subject to
                                                 change) will be available only from:
                                                       National Technical Information Service
                                                       5285 Port Royal Road
                                                       Springfield. VA 22161
                                                       Telephone: 703-487-4650
                                               The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                                                       Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                                                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                                       Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED
                      US  EPA  REGION  V
                      CHICAGO  IL  6060U
                                             ST
                                                                                                  Third-Class
                                                                                                  Bulk Rate

-------