United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
                                      Municipal Environmental Research
                                      Laboratory
                                      Cincinnati OH 45268
  Research and Development
                                      EPA-600/S2-82-025  May 1982
  Project Summary
Increasing ARCAT®  Test
en
  Sesitivity  for

  Examination of Potable Waters
",\x vv
  Jenef ir D. Isbister, Jeanne L Aim, Roberta Foutch, Alice DeSouza, Randall S.
  Wentzel, and Judith F. Kitchens
    The report summarized  here des-
   cribes the development of a method
   for concentrating  coliphages from
   potable waters. The method is used in
   conjunction with a rapid  coliphage
   analysis  technique  (ARCAT)* to
   detect 1 coliphage/100 ml of water
   sample.  Seven concentration tech-
   niques were evaluated in preliminary
   feasibility studies, and three methods
   were  selected for  in-depth  study
   based on recovery of coliphages, time
   required for availability of results, and
   ease of performing the techinque.
   Two of the three methods selected for
   in-depth studies  were membrane fil-
   tration  methods  using  positively
   charged and negatively charged fil-
   ters. The third method involved ampli-
   fication of coliphages by incubation to
   allow for a lytic burst to occur.
    After in-depth studies and optimiza-
   tion of procedures, membrane filtra-
   tion with the use of positively charged
   filters was selected as the concentra-
   tion method  of  choice.  Positively
   charged filters can be used success-
   fully to  concentrate coliphages pre-
   sent in  potable waters at a level of 1
   plaque forming unit (pfu)/100 ml of
   water  sample  using  the ARCAT
   procedure. The ARCAT amplification
   technique can be used to obtain qual-
  * Mention of trade names or commercial products
  does not constitute endorsement or recom-
  mendation for use.
                                      itative indication of the presence of
                                      coliphage when coliphage numbers
                                      are expected to be < 5/100 ml and
                                      can be run in parallel with the ARCAT/
                                      concentration procedure. Test results
                                      are available in 6.5 hours at an approx-
                                      imate cost of $4.12 per test. ARCAT
                                      results can be used to estimate the
                                      number of fecal and total coliforms in
                                      the water sample or may be used inde-
                                      pendently as  an indicator of water
                                      quality.
                                       Examination of the effects of physi-
                                      cal treatment of water indicated that
                                      settling  and filtration are effective
                                      means for  reducing  levels of  coli-
                                      phages and total and fecal coliforms in
                                      natural waters. Coliphages appeared
                                      to be less efficiently removed by these
                                      processes  than  total and  fecal
                                      coliforms.
                                       Disinfection studies indicated that
                                      chlorine dioxide was effective as a vir-
                                      icide and bactericide. At ozone levels
                                      achieved  in this study, reductions in
                                      coliphages  and coliforms  were  not
                                      consistent. Ozone disinfection effec-
                                      tiveness was both concentration and
                                      exposure-time dependent.
                                       This Project Summary was devel-
                                      oped by  EPA's Municipal Environ-
                                      mental  Research Laboratory.
                                      Cincinnati, OH, to announce key find-
                                      ings of the research project that is
                                      fully documented in a separate report
                                      of the same title (see Project Report
                                      ordering information at back).

-------
Introduction
  Waterborne diseases can be spread
rapidly by bacterial and/or viral con-
taminants  in any  waters  used for
human  consumption.  Community
water supplies are treated to remove or
reduce  these contaminants by  such
methods as settling, filtration, and dis-
infection. Although the most probable
number (MPN) and the membrane fil-
tration (MF) procedures for detecting
total coliform bacteria  (indicators of
fecal contamination) are standard tests
for determining the quality of treated
water,  the minimum  time  for results
from these procedures is 24 ± 2 hours.
A rapid  test  to evaluate the sanitary
quality of water could be used to decide
whether or  not  additional  treatment,
such as booster chlorination in the sys-
tem, would be necessary.
  Under contracts with the U.S. Depart-
ment of the Army, Atlantic Research
Corporation  (ARC) developed  a  rapid
test to determine the number of bacteri-
ophages of a given bacterial species in a
water sample within 4 to 6 hours. The
detection of coliphages was of particu-
lar interest, and a quantitative relation-
ship between coliform bacteria  and
their coliphages  (infective for Escheri-
chia coli C) was established.
  Field tests of the coliphage method,
ARCAT,  were conducted in 1977 and
1978.  The  quantitative relationship
between coliphages  and conforms
established in the earlier studies was
confirmed and shown to be valid for nat-
ural waters  sampled throughout the
United States.
  Under a National Science Foundation
Grant, the test procedure was simpli-
fied and conditions for coliphage repli-
cation   and  plaque   formation  were
optimized. The sensitivity of ARCAT fol-
lowing these modifications was 5 coli-
phages/100  ml  of water  (based on
plating four 5-ml aliquots of the water
sample). At this sensitivity, the method
was not suitable for determination of
water  quality in the potable water
range. The study reported here focused
on increasing the sensitivity of ARCAT
to the level of 1 coliphage/100 ml.

Results and Discussion
  The concentration techniques evalu-
ated to  increase the  sensitivity of
ARCAT to detect 1 coliphage/100 ml of
water sample are listed below:
  • Concentration by filtration through
    positively charged filters
  • Concentration by filtration through
    negatively charged filters
  • Osmotic filtration (dialysis)
  • Controlled lytic bursts
  • Adsorption on inorganic salts
  • Polymer two-phase separation
  • Magnetic filtration
  • Electrophoresis
  From  Table  1, the percent of coli-
phage recoveries achieved by the con-
centration  techniques,   the  relative
complexity of the method, and the time
factor increase over the ARCAT test
alone can be compared.
  Three methods were selected for in-
depth study based on recovery of coli-
phages, time  required  to obtain test
results,  and  ease  of  performing the
technique. Concentration using posi-
tively charged and negatively charged
filters yielded good coliphage recover-
ies and  added 0.5 hour and 1.5 hours,
respectively, to the time required  for
ARCAT. A third method, amplification of
coliphages by incubation to allow a lytic
burst to  occur, increased  the  time
required for availability of test results by
70 minutes.
  Concentration of  coliphages  with
positively and negatively charged filter
methods was  initially evaluated with
the  use of sterilized  water  samples
seeded  with known concentrations of
stock coliphages. Both filter types dem-
onstrated good adsorption,  and coli-
phage recoveries of greater than 70%
were generally obtained. These filtra-
                 tion  techniques were optimized with
                 respect to coliphage adsorption and elu-
                 tion conditions. Because of occasional
                 clogging  of the negatively charged fil-
                 ters and the additional hour required to
                 concentrate the sample using the nega-
                 tively  charged  filter,  the  positively
                 charged filter was selected as the filtra-
                 tion method of choice. The AMF Cuno
                 Zeta Plus 60S positively charged filter
                 consistently had the best coliphage
                 adsorption (80% to 100%) and recover-
                 ies (>90%). The filter performed  best
                 when the water sample was adjusted to
                 pH 6.0 before filtration. Recoveries of
                 the coliphages from the filter were con-
                 sistently  high when 3% Trypticase Soy
                 Broth adjusted to pH 8.5 was used as
                 the eluent.
                   Concentration  of  coliphages from
                 natural waters using the Zeta Plus 60S
                 filter was evaluated. Coliphage recover-
                 ies from the  positively  charged filter
                 were  compared  with   coliphages
                 detected  by plating 100 ml of the water
                 sample in the  ARCAT procedure. Table
                 2 shows coliphage recoveries from nat-
                 ural water samples; percentages reco-
                 vered were more variable than those
                 obtained  using samples spiked with T2
                 and 0174 coliphages (93% to  100%).
                 The types and densities of coliphages
                 present in  the water samples were a
                 factor  in the  variable  recoveries. A
                 severe drought during  much  of  the
Table 1.     Comparison of Concentration Methods
    Concentration
      Technique
 Additional"
Time Required
% Coliphage
 Recovered
Complexity of
 Technique b
Positive filters
    SOS
    70C
    1MDS
Negative filters
    Cox 2 fjm
    Cox 0.45 fjm
    Bio-Rad 0.2 fjm
Osmotic filtration
Lytic burst
Adsorption on
  inorganic salts
Polymer two-phase
  separation
Magnetic filtration
     30 min
     40 min
     15 min

     15 min
  30-60 mm
    >2hr
      8hrc
       1 hr

       2hr

  18-24 hr
       1 hr
      13-73
      27-65
    42-108

       3-47
      0-125
       0-71
      0-1 SO
        0-9

        100
     0-37.5
      2
      2
      2

      3
      3
      3
      2
      2
      4
      4
* Time in addition to that required for ARCAT. (Includes the set-up and performance
  of the concentration techniques.)
b Comparedwith ARCATat complexityof1'. Complexity increased by additional manip-
  ulation of samples and materials preparation or increased length of time needed for
  processing.
c At least 8 hours were required to achieve a 2-fold concentration of 100 ml.
" This technique involves amplification of bacteriophages present, not recovery by
  concentration.

-------
Table 2. Correlation of Coliphage Results from ARC AT and Zeta
Plus 60S Concentration/ ARCAT Methods.


Date Sample
8/20 Occoquan raw
8/26 Accotink
Holmes run
8/27 Accotink
8/28 Potomac raw
8/29 Accotink
9/02 Cherokee
Cherokee
9/04 Potomac raw
Potomac raw
Potomac settled
9/08 Cherokee
9/09 Potomac raw
Potomac raw
Potomac raw
Potomac settled
Potomac settled
Potomac settled
9/15 Potomac raw
Potomac raw
Potomac raw
9/15 Potomac filtered
9/16 Potomac raw
Potomac raw
Potomac settled
Potomac settled
9/17 Potomac raw
Potomac raw
Potomac settled
Potomac settled
9/18 Potomac raw
Potomac raw
Potomac settled
Potomac settled
9/19 Potomac raw
Potomac settled
Potomac settled
9/22 Potomac settled
Potomac filtered
9/23 Potomac raw
Potomac settled
" Plaque forming units.
Volume
Filtered
(ml)
750
500
500
500
500
500
500
100
500
100
1000
500
10O
500
WOO
100
500
1000
100
500
WOO
500
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
200

Coliphage pfu

ARCAT "
3
6
1
4
60
6
8
8
41
41
14
3
27
27
27
8
8
8
21
21
21
4
15
15
2
2
;5
15
5
5
807
907
295
295
241
72
72
3
1
9
5


Eluatec '
7
39
12
19
337
16
58
15
143
22
29
3
26
111
162
1
15
141
77
258
335
22
10
15*
1
1*
21
10*
5
8*
620
391*
295
159*
239
19
9*
3
2
40
6

Coliphage
% Recovered d
31.1
130.0
240.0
95.0
112.0
53.3
145.0
187.5
69.8
53.6
20.7
20.0
96.3
82.2
60.0
12.5
37.5
176.3
366.7
245.7
159.9
110.0
66.7
100.0
50.0
50.0
140.0
66.7
100.0
160.0
76.8
48.4
100.0
53.9
99.2
26.4
12.5
100.0
200.0
222.2
120.0

b Coliphage pfu/100 ml determined by A RCA T.
c Coliphage pfu in eluate. "*" indicates 10ml eluate volume plated; all others were 20
ml.
" Eluate pfu

x 100.


ARCAT pfu (multiplication factor)
Multiplication factor is number of 100 ml volumes equal to
for concentration.






original volume filtered


initial concentration of coliphages fil-
tered. The accuracy of the Zeta Plus
concentration method in predicting col-
iphages present in the original water
sample is illustrated in Table 3; calcula-
tions were made using the regression
line equation: Ypred =1.2853 X - 3.61.
Detection of low level (1 to 5 pfu/100
ml) coliphage contamination in water
samples using ARCAT without concen-
tration was done by amplifying the coli-
phage(s) present in the sample.
Nutrient addition and addition of the £
coliC host to a final concentration of 1 x
108 cells/ml in the amplification flask
were required. Incubation of the ampli-
fication sample (100 ml, 200 ml) for 70
minutes at 35 °C before plating in
ARCAT provided optimum amplification
of coliphages for which E. coli C is a
suitable host. The amplification tech-
nique was most valuable when used in
conjunction with the standard ARCAT
procedure for waters expected to con-
tain less than 5 coliphages/ 100 ml (the
detection limit for the standard ARCAT
procedure). If coliphages were not
found by the standard ARCAT proce-
dure, the amplification technique
allowed the user to determine if any
coliphages were present. Thus, the
amplification technique yielded only
qualitative results at the 1 to 5 coli-
phage/ 100 ml level.
Physical treatment of water (settling,
• filtration) reduced coliphages, total coli-
forms, and fecal coliforms by 90% to
100%. In a brief study of the effects of
ultraviolet light, chlorine dioxide, and
ozone disinfectants, coliphages
appeared to be as sensitive to ultraviolet
light as were total coliforms and fecal
coliforms. At a concentration of 5 mg/L,
chlorine dioxide was effective as a vir-
icide and in reducingfecal and total coli-
forms. Reduction of coliphages, total
coliforms, and fecal coliforms by expo-
sure to ozone was time and ozone-
concentration dependent. Bacterio-
phage and coliform reductions were not
consistent at the ozone concentrations
achieved during this study.
The ARCAT concentration procedure
for detecting 1 coliphage/100 ml of
water is given below:
study period resulted in unusually low
or variable coliphage occurrences com-
pared to previous nondrought periods.
  Least squares linear regression anal-
ysis of the data shown in Table 2 was
used to determine how well  the Zeta
Plus concentration  method  predicted
the  number  of coliphages originally
present in the  natural water sample.
The  regression (Figure  1) was highly
significant with a coefficient of determi-
nation of 0.8516, indicating that more
than 85% of  the variation in the coli-
phage determination was related to the
Adjust water sample (100 to 1000
ml) to pH 6.0 with 0.1  M  or  1.0
M HCI
Filter water sample at pH  6.0
through the Zeta Plus 60S filter
with vacuum
Remove flask containing the filtrate
and replace with a sterile flask

-------
     500  -
                                               /? = 0.5225
                                               R2 = 0.8516
                                               Slope  1,2853
                                               Intercept = -3.61
                     100         200         300
                                 X ( recovered)
                                              400
500
Figure 1.
Least squares regression line ofcoliphages recovered versus coliphages
filtered.
Table 3.    Predicted Coliphage Versus Coliphage Applied.
Coliphage (pfu)
Detected by
ARCAT Concentration
m
1
2
3
5
6
8
10
12
15
16
21
22
Coliphage
(pfu)
Predicted a
(Y)
—
—
0.23
2.8
4.1
6.6
9.2
11.75
15.59
16.87
23.3
24.6
Coliphage
(Pfu)
Applied

2,2
1
3
5
10
5
15. 15
5
8. 15
30
15
20.41
a The sensitivity of the method is > 3 pfu applied to the filter.
b Coliphage applied was determined by plating 100 ml in the regular ARCAT
 procedure.
  • Apply 10 ml of trypticase soy broth
    at  pH  8.5   to  the  filter,  and
    allow  a  contact  time  of  5
    minutes  before  vacuum  is
    applied
  • Apply a second 10 ml aliquot of TSB
    at pH 8.5 to the filter
  • Wash the filter  with  three 1-rrtl
    aliquots of sterile distilled water
  • Divide  the total  eluate  (20 ml)
    between four tubes each contain-
    ing  5.5  ml   of  molten modified
    nutrient agar
  • Add 1 ml of E. coli C host to each
    tube
  • Mix the  contents of each tube and
    decant  into  a sterile  Petri  dish;
    allow agar to solidify and  incu-
    bate  at 35° C for 6 hours
  • Enumerate plaques at  6 hours

Results
  In summary, the use of the Zeta Plus
60S positively charged filter to concen-
trate low  levels of coliphages in a water
sample provided the increase in ARCAT
test sensitivity  needed   for routine
examination of potable waters for coli-
phages. Test results were  obtained  in
6.5 hours at an  approximate cost  of
$4.12 per test. The ARCAT results can
be used to estimate the number of fecal
and total  coliforms in the water sample
or may be used independently as an
indicator  of water quality.

Recommendations
  1. ARCAT  sensitivity  has  been
increased using the Zeta Plus 60S con-
centration method for determination  of
water  quality in the  potable  water
range.  This method should  be field
tested in water quality laboratories  in
various geographical areas in the Uni-
ted States.  Laboratories selected for
testing should examine a wide variety of
water samples, treatment processes,
and testing  expertise. Each laboratory
should evaluate at  least  50 samples
during a  1 -year period. Data for each
sample should include: 1) water pH and
turbidity, 2)  sample volume, 3) number
of coliphages detected,  4) number  of
fecal and total coliforms detected, and
5) virus data, if available. Data should be
collected  and evaluated at a central
laboratory.
  2. Amplification of coliphages in nat-
ural water samples can detect low level
contamination but does not allow for
quantification of the actual coliphages
present in the original sample. Further
study of coliphage morphology, plaque
size, burst size, and the significance of

-------
the presence of any one coliphage type
in a water sample is needed. The types
of coliphages present in natural waters
must first be  isolated and identified,
however.  Correlation  of specific coli-
phages with epidemiological informa-
tion should  yield a predictive test  for
waterbone disease outbreak.
  3. Coliphages survive physical water
treatment processes as well as or per-
haps better  than coliform bacteria. A
study to correlate enteric virus and coli-
phage survival through water treatment
processes is recommended. One or two
enteric viruses should be  selected  for
initial studies to compare survival of the
viruses with that of the coliphages fol-
lowing  water  treatment  processes
under controlled conditions. Survival of
the viruses and coliphages should then
be  evaluated under actual treatment
conditions.
  The full report was submitted in ful-
fillment of Contract No. 68-03-2914 by
the  Atlantic  Research  Corporation,
under the sponsorship of the U.S. Envir-
onmental Protection Agency.
J. D. Isbister. J. L Aim. R. Foutch, A. DeSouza, R. S. Wentsel. andJ. F. Kitchens
  are with the Atlantic Research Corporation, Alexandria. VA 22134.
Donald J. Reasoner is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Increasing ARC A T® Test Sensitivity for Examina-
  tion of Potable Waters," (Order No. PB 82-196 163; Cost: $12.00. subjectto
  change) will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield. VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268
                                                                                          OUSGPO: 1982 — 559-092/3404

-------
Untied States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED
                                                     PS   0000329
                                                     U  S  ENVIR  PROTECTION  AGENCY
                                                     REGION  5 LIBRARY
                                                     230  S DEARBORN STREET
                                                     CHICAGO  IL  60604

-------