United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Municipal Environmental Research
Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
Research and Development
EPA-600/S2-82-087  Nov. 1982
Project  Summary
Feasibility Study of
Granular Activated  Carbon
Adsorption and On-Site
Regeneration
Richard Miller and David J. Hartman
  A cooperative study was under-
taken by the Cincinnati Water Works
(CWW) and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to investi-
gate the feasibility of municipal water
treatment using granular activated
carbon (GAC) adsorption and on-site
regeneration. The project was to
determine whether the use of GAC in
either deep-bed contactors or conven-
tional-depth  gravity filters  with on-
site carbon regeneration (reactivation)
would be a feasible means of removing
trace organics from Ohio River water
at a reasonable cost and without
adverse effects on the level of treat-
ment provided by the existing plant.
  GAC removed a broad spectrum of
organics from Ohio River water, and it
functioned as well if not better than
sand in removing turbidity. Reactiva-
tion restored the GAC to  its virgin
adsorptive capacity. Because  GAC
removes all free chlorine and all but a
trace of combined chlorine, a post
chlorination facility and additional
clean/veil capacity would be needed
for  adequate disinfection.  Costs for
implementing GAC treatment at the
CWW  facility were estimated to be
$12.5 million per year for  the filter
option and $8.5 million per year for
the contactor option.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Municipal Environmental
Research Laboratory, Cincinnati. OH.
to announce key findings of the
research project  that is fully docu-
mented in a separate report of the
same title (see Project Report ordering
information at back).

Introduction
  In August 1977, the CWW entered
into a cooperative agreement with the
EPA to pursue a feasibility study of
municipal water treatment using GAC
adsorption and on-site regeneration.
This project is one of only a few in the
country to use full-scale filters,  post-
filtration contactors,  and a granular
carbon regeneration (reactivation)
furnace, all on site.
  The  water treatment plant has  a
design capacity of 10.2  mVsec (235
mgd), and is a typical alum coagulation,
rapid sand filter plant with two large
presettling basins having a combined
capacity of approximately 1.4 million m3
(372 million gallons) and a retention
time of 2 to 3 days. The  resulting
finished water from the treatment plant
is  low  in turbidity  and  meets all
maximum contaminant levels (MCL's)
as established under the Safe Drinking
Water Act. Average daily pumping rates
are currently 6.1 mVsec (140 mgd). As
such, this  system  is the largest  com-
munity water system on the Ohio River.
  The main objective of the project was
to determine whether the use of GAC in
either post-filtration deep-bed contactors

-------
or conventional-depth, sand-replace-
ment gravity filters with on-site carbon
reactivation would be a feasible means
of removing trace organics from Ohio
River water  at a  reasonable cost and
without adverse effects on the quality of
treatment provided by the existing plant.
  A secondary objective was the deve-
lopment of plant design  and operating
parameters for full-scale plant conver-
sion to GAC treatment. Additional
aspects of the project included the study
of various filter-adsorber configurations
and types of activated carbon  in pilot
and full-scale applications.
  The  project was  divided into three
phases conducted over a period of 3.5
years. In the first phase  of the project,
three existing rapid sand  filters  (1.7
L/sec • m2 or 5 mgd) were converted to
GAC  filter adsorbers. Various GAC
types and bed depths  were studied to
compare organic  removal  efficiencies,
bed lives, general water  quality char-
acteristics, the need for a sand under-
layer, and operational  problems.
  The second phase involved the use of
pilot-scale components  to  investigate
the  effects  of  reactivation on the
activated carbon's adsorptive ability and
to determine the  reliability of pilot
columns as indicators of the performance
of full-scale components. The relative
performance of lignite and bituminous-
based GAC was also studied.

  In the  last phase of this project, the
relative performances of carbon filters
and 0.3 L/sec-m2 (1 mgd} post-filtration
carbon  contactors  were studied, the
most advantageous empty-bed  contact
time for the  GAC was determined, and
the effectiveness of on-site reactivation
was evaluated. Pilot columns were also
operated in  parallel with the full-sized
units to assess again  their usefulness
as predictors of full-scale operation.
Finally, a significant aspect  of this
project was the development of prelimi-
nary cost estimates for full-plant
conversion to the GAC adsorption
process.
  The first three GAC filter adsorbers
went on line in  February 1978. While
data and experience were being gained
on GAC filters and pilot-scale filters and
contactors, contracts  were negotiated
for the  construction of plant-sized
contactors  and  a carbon reactivation
furnace. Contactor operations started in
October 1979, and furnace shakedown
operations commenced in March 1980.
All operations were carefully monitored
and recorded to  permit  a  rational
evaluation of the costs, effectiveness.
and  problems to  be expected in  full-
plant utilization  of  GAC with on-site
reactivation.

Significant Findings
  1.  GAC is  effective  in  removing a
     board spectrum of organics from
     Ohio River  water.  Though many
     specific organics  were investi-
     gated, they were generally present
     in such low concentrations (ng/L
     or parts per trillion) that evaluation
     of the effects of GAC was possible
     only with rather elaborate  and
     newly developed analytical tech-
     niques GAC proved to be effective
     on all but a few of the organics
     investigated.
  2.  Since it is  nearly impossible to
     monitor daily for all of the com-
     pounds present in the raw water
     (many of which are  naturally
     occurring), more general criteria
     were needed with which to deter-
     mine the life cycle (or exhaustion)
     of a GAC adsorber bed. The criteria
     selected included the existing
     MCL of 0.10 mg/L trihalomethanes
     (THM's)and 1.0 mg/L total organic
     carbon (TOC), which was developed
     in accordance with design criteria
     in the proposed EPA GAC regula-
     tion (now rescinded), Control of
     Organic Chemical Contaminants in
     Drinking Water, Federal Register,
     February 9, 1978.
  3.  GAC functioned  as well as or
     better than sand in  removing
     turbidity. Filter beds that contained
     part sand and part GAC did not
     function as well as either a full
     sand or a full GAC bed. In all cases,
     the filter medium was  supported
     by a coarse sand underlayer, and it
     was virtually impossible to prevent
     removing some of this  sand with
     the carbon for reactivation. A sand
     separator was included in the
     reactivation equipment, but it was
     not efficient  enough for  this
     application. Sand carryover caused
     frequent shut-downs of the furnace
     by  plugging  the  fluidizing gas
     ports. This problem was not asso-
     ciated with contactor operations.
     Data indicated that floe removal by
     GAC filters  had little effect on the
     carbon's adsorptive capacity when
     compared with a similar contact
     time in a contactor.
  4. Longer contact times resulted in
     more than a proportionately longer
     service  life,  thus affording  more
     efficient use of the GAC. Overall,
   the data indicated that the optimum
   empty-bed contact time was 7 to
   15 minutes under average condi-
   tions and greater than 15 minutes
   during critical summer conditions.
   These results tend to support the
   use  of contactors  that can be
   constructed with the  optimum
   contact time.
5. Reactivation restored the GAC to
   its virgin  adsorptive  capacity with
   respect to both the various organic
   parameters and carbon character-
   istics studied.
6. The cost of buying carbon to make
   up for that  lost in the process of
   removing it from the bed (filter or
   contactor), reactivating Jt, and
   returning it to the bed would be a
   significant  factor in the overall
   costs of implementing carbon
   treatment.  The average bed-to-
   bed GAC  loss for nine reactivation
   cycles for contactors was  15.3%
   compared  with  18.5% for  six
   reactivation cycles for filters. By
   contrast, earlier estimates by
   furnace manufacturers  and the
   EPA were about 5%.
7. The National Institute of Occupa-
   tional Safety and  Health (NIOSH)
   conducted a survey for working
   conditions. GAC is not considered
   hazardous,  and the  level of dust
   present was well below the accept-
   able level  for  nuisance  dusts.
   Though  noise  levels outside  the
   control room  exceeded the stan-
   dards for continuous exposure,
   noise was not  deemed a  hazard
   because the operators spend only
   brief periods  outside the control
   room.
   An  independent laboratory under
   contract  sampled and analyzed
   the furnace off-gases. The  South-
   west Ohio Air Pollution Authority
   reviewed the  laboratory's report
   and determined that  the emissions
   were well within the limits estab-
   lished for a process plant. In-house
   analysis of samples from various
   waste effluents contained no
   contaminants at levels significant
   enough to  require  special treat-
   ment before disposal.
8. As expected, GAC removes  all free
   chlorine  and all  but a  trace of
   combined chlorine. These removals
   permit the growth of  bacteria
   within the carbon bed with poten-
   tial for carryover into the distribu-
   tion system. Thus, though  it may
   not be necessary  to increase the

-------
     amount of chlorine used through-
     out the entire treatment process, it
     would be necessary to construct a
     post-chlorination facility and add-
     itional clearwell capacity to provide
     sufficient chlorine contact time for
     disinfection with full-scale  GAC
     conversion.
  9. GAC implementation costs were
     projected for the CWW facility as it
     exists today. The annual cost of
     GAC treatment will depend on
     which treatment  alternative is
     selected — the application of GAC
     in existing but modified filters or in
     newly  constructed contactors
     following normal sand filtration.
  Under the sand-replacement option,
about $37 million would be needed for
capital costs and about $8 million for
operating  expenses (in 1981  dollars).
The annual amortization of the capital
expenditures would bring the  total
annual cost to about  $12.5  million,
adding about 180 per  hundred cubic
feet to the cost of water to both city and
suburban customers.
  Under the post-filtration contactor
option, about $38 million would be
needed for capital costs, but only about
$4  million for operating  expenses (in
1981  dollars). The annual amortization
of the capital expenditures would bring
the total  annual cost  to about $8.5
million, adding about 130 per hundred
cubic feet  to the cost of water.
  The full report  was submitted in
fulfillment of Cooperative Agreement
No. CR805443 by the City of Cincinnati
Water Works  under the sponsorship of
the U.S.  Environmental Protection
Agency.
Richard Miller and David J. Hartman are with the Cincinnati Water Works,
  Cincinnati, OH 45232.
Jack DeMarco and Ben W. Lykins. Jr.. are the EPA Project Officers (see below).
The complete report consists of two volumes,  entitled "Feasibility Study of
  Granular Activated Carbon Adsorption and On-Site Regeneration."
    "Volume 1. Detailed Report," (Order No. PB 83-121 731; Cost: $25.00,
    subject to change)
    "Volume 2. Supplemental Figures and Data," (Order No. PB 83-121 749;
    Cost: $43.50, subject to change)
The above reports will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield,  VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officers can be contacted at:
        Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268

-------
                                                                          GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:  1982	659-O17/O869
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                                    Center for Environmental Research
                                    Information
                                    Cincinnati OH 45268
    Postage and
    Fees Paid
    Environmental
    Protection
    Agency
    EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED
                                                                                    2
ION  AGENCY

-------