United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
Environmental Research
Laboratory
Duluth MN 55804
 Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-81-003  Apr. 1981
Project  Summary
 Effects of  Fluctuating,
 Sublethal  Applications  of
 Heavy  Metal  Solutions
 Upon  the  Gill  Ventilatory
 Response  of  Bluegills
 (Lepomis macrochirus)

 John Cairns, Jr., Kenneth W. Thompson, and Albert C. Hendricks
  This study demonstrates the use of
minicomputers for continuously
observing the ventilatory behavior of
fish in order to monitor the quality of
the water passing through fish sensing
chambers. The water source could be
an industrial effluent,  agricultural
runoff, or a carefully controlled
laboratory source as in this study.
  Situations of complex, fluctuating
toxic effluents were simulated in order
to describe responses that could be
expected. These results were then
compared with those of control fish
which were not exposed to toxic
effluents.
  Not only did ventilatory rates
significantly increase in response to
laboratory effluents (sublethal con-
centrations of heavy metal solutions),
but also the amplitude of the ventila-
tory signal was reduced considerably.
This is a promising system that could
be developed into a useful, on-line
environmental monitor for industrial,
agricultural, or  other purposes.
  This Project  Summary was devel-
oped by EPA's Environmental Re-
search Laboratory, Duluth, MN and
it's Newtown Fish Toxicology Station,
Cincinnati, OH, to announce key
findings of the research project that is
fully documented in a separate report
of the same title (see Project Report
ordering information at back).

Introduction
  This project was undertaken to
investigate the feasibility of using
ventilatory behavior as a monitor of
environmental quality. The weak electrical
signals produced by the movement of
the muscles in the branchial region as a
fish ventilates its gills can be detected
by submerged non-contact electrodes
placed at either end of a holding tank
(Figures 1 and 2). The primary objectives
were to describe the average ventilatory
behavior as well as the response to
sublethal amounts of various heavy
metal solutions.
  Most previous studies of the effects of
environmental changes on the ventila-
tory behavior were carried out by visual
observation of short, intermittent strip
chart recordings. Interfacing with a
minicomputer allows the continuous
accumulation of data and, thus, a more
complete picture of natural variability as
well as of the response to toxicants.
  In this study, the ventilatory signals
from 16 fish at a time were amplified

-------
AM
Figure 1.
                                        B
A  bluegill in a ventilatory sensing chamber. Water flows into the
receiving chamber (A), through the sensing chamber (Bl. and out the
drain (C). The elctrodes are the S-shaped wires at either end of the
sensing chamber. The signal is carried to an amplifier (AM).
                                 Lepomis macrochirus
                                   (Bluegill Sunfish)
  +3 -i
.2  0
•C
•2
Q)
   -3J
                             10
                                      20
30
                                     Seconds
Figure 2.    An example of the amplified ventilatory signal of a bluegill ventilating at
            approximately 20 times per minute.
 using high-grain amplifiers which were
 interfaced to a PDP8/E minicomputer.
 These data  were  accumulated contin-
 uously, and  both the ventilatory signal
 and the average amplitude of the
 ventilatory  signal were recorded on
 magnetic tape for later analysis.
  Most fish  toxicity data are based on
 96-hour, constant concentration
 laboratory tests,  usually for a single
 toxicant at a time. Actual industrial or
 agricultural effluents are  usually
                            complex mixtures that vary in composi-
                            tion and concentration, and the present
                            study investigated the effects of
                            fluctuating as well as constant toxicant
                            applications.
                             The fish were exposed to sublethal
                            concentrations of divalent zinc, divalent
                            copper, to mixtures of zinc and copper,
                            or to mixtures of zinc, copper, divalent
                            nickel, and hexavalent chromium.
                            Median lethal concentrations  (LC50)
                            were determined with 96-hour continu-
                                                                  ous flow toxicity tests (Table  1). The
                                                                  toxicity of the two mixtures was found to
                                                                  be additive.

                                                                  Table 1.    Ninety-six Hour Median
                                                                             Lethal Concentrations
                                                                             (LC50) of the Various
                                                                             Toxicants Used in This
                                                                             Study
                                                                                            95%
                                                                                LC50    Confidence
                                                                    Toxicant*   (mg/l)      Limits
MixA
Zn*2
Cu*
/V/+2
Cr+6
Zn+2
Ci/2
MixB
Zn+*
C
-------
                                          Fish 7 Treated
                                        c
                                        Fish 14 Treated

                                     Fish 9 Control
                                          Fish 14 Treated

                                        Fish 13 Treated
                                     Fish 9 Control
                                                                   *v
                                                                       L*
^e
0°°
v°
KO
120
«0
.
4
P
(60
120
60
40
/
* f^-^t
%VV »
T* *o
> ^"'
O>''»
-is::-
«t •:
JSc


^ 	 p "A______^__J^2j ./*•
._, ~~- ^.^
£.^^* -^/^j^*^"-^-/ /**
* •"•- " ^'"'""-Oj^J^v^-^voC /r* , ., _
^^— _^— ^^^^—^^ 	 / Fish 3 Cc
/? /4 Treated
4 Treated
ntrol
                                                              * 0   24  48  72   M  120  144  m  1*2
                                                                          Time (Hours)
           72   96  120  M4  M  IM  M
            T/'/ne (Hours)
                                                                            M  120  144  *•
                                                                          TYme (Hours)
                                                                                                     7s/7 16 Treated
                                                                                                 f/s/7 70 Treated

                                                                                               Fish 15 Control
     Vfc\V> „„
    a?  ^  ::
 /V  xH
^V  -'»:
                                          Fish 16 Treated

                                        Fish 8 Treated

                                     Fish  12 Control
             Time (Hours)
                                                                      1«
                                                                 V  "°1E"
                                                                                                         /6 Treated

                                                                                                        Treated
                                                                              120  M4  I
                                                                              (Hours)
                                                                                               Fish 3 Control
Figure 3.     Examples of the variability seen in the ventilatory rate response of the bluegill to solutions of Zn++ and Cu++. The first
             fish in all six cases are untreated controls while the remaining two were chosen to give examples of the range of the
             variability of response to the toxicant solutions. The solid line on the fourth vertical plane in each case indicates the
             shape, duration, and concentration of the toxicant application.
  The addition of dissolved salts to the
water in the holding chamber caused a
reduction in the electrical  resistance
and this, when carried to extremes (i.e.,
sea water), can cause a large reduction
in the signal amplitude. However, none
of the toxicant concentrations used in
this study could be shown to cause more
than a 10% reduction in amplitude, and
most would  cause less  than 2%
reduction. Thus, the observed amplitude
reduction indicates a  significant
response to the toxicant  solutions—a
response that can be  used  to monitor
water quality, or more significantly, to
enhance the use of ventilatory rate for
that purpose.
                                         Chi squared goodness of fit tests and
                                       Cochran's C statistic indicated that
                                       within each interval (pre-exposure,
                                       exposure, post-exposure) the average
                                       rates and amplitudes were normally
                                       distributed and the variances were
                                       homogeneous. Thus, it was appropriate
                                       to compare the results between fish
                                       using an analysis of variance (ANOVA).
                                       The indication from these tests was that
                                       there was  little or no statistical
                                       difference between the fish before or
                                       after  exposure, but, during the exposure
                                       period, a considerable difference
                                       existed between the exposed and
                                       control fish. This was true for both rate
                                       and amplitude  studies. Statistically
differentiating between the responses
to the various patterns of application
was difficult  due to the extreme
smoothing of  data.  However, it is
significant to note that the fish are
capable of responding in similar manner
to repeated exposures to toxic effluents
(Figure 3).
Conclusions
1.  The ventilatory response of the blue
   gill was shown to be measurably
   affected by sublethal concentrations
   of zinc, copper, and complex mixtures
   of heavy metals.
    4 US GOVERNMENT POINTING OFFICE H61-757-OU/7055

-------
    2. The typical response of this species
      was an elevated ventilatory rate and
      a reduced ventilatory amplitude in
      the presence of sublethal concentra-
      tions of the various toxicant solutions.
    3. Fish are  capable of responding
      similarly to repeated  exposures of
      toxicant solutions, indicating the
      feasibility of an environmental
      monitoring system based on ventila-
      tory behavior.
    4. The amplitude response was primar-
      ily due to a real change in ventilatory
      behavior of the fish, not to a change
      in electrical  properties of the water
      due to the addition of the toxicant
      solutions.
    5. The ventilatory data met the require-
      ments for parametric statistical
      analyses when comparing individ-
      uals. Thus, when sample size is large
      enough, conventional methods such
      as the analysis of variance can be
      employed.
           John Cairns, Jr.. Kenneth W. Thompson, and Albert C. Hendricks are with the
             University Center for Environmental Studies,  Virginia Polytechnic Institute
             and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
           William B. Horning, II, is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
           The complete report, entitled "Effects of Fluctuating, Sublethal Applications of
             Heavy Metal Solutions Upon the Gill Ventilatory Response of Bluegills
             (Lepomis macrochirus),"fO''Qte''/Vo. PB 81-150 997; Cost: $11.00, subjectto
             change) will be available only from:
                  National Technical Information Service
                  5285 Port Royal Road
                  Springfield, VA 22161
                  Telephone: 703-487-4650
           The EPA Project Officer can  be contacted at:
                  Newtown Fish Toxicology Station
                  Environmental Research Laboratory—Duluth
                  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
                  Cincinnati, OH 45244
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED
                                                                     U
                                        0000329
                                     S  ENVIK  P
                                          J b LIBKAkY
                                        $  OEARBOK'M  STREET
                                 CHICAGO  i l_
                                                                                                      AQENCf

-------