United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Research
Laboratory
Athens GA 30613
Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-82-032 Sept. 1982
Project Summary
Field-to-Stream Transport of
Agricultural  Chemicals and
Sediment  in an  Bowa
Watershed:  Part I.  Data
Base for Model Testing
(1976-1978)
H. P. Johnson and J. L. Baker
  Data on the field-to-stream transport
of sediment and chemicals from an
agricultural watershed were collected
in a three-year study to provide
information for testing and evaluating
mathematical models under develop-
ment for predicting agricultural non-
point source pollution. These models
are prepared as tools to evaluate the
effectiveness of different farm man-
agement practices in controlling
losses of nutrients, pesticides,  and
sediment in field drainage to receiving
waters. In  the study, data were
collected for small corn, soybean, and
pasture fields; for two larger mixed-
cover watersheds; and at three drain-
age-stream sites.
  During the study (1976-1978),
annual rainfall (753 mm) and stream-
flow (124 mm) averaged a little below
normal.  Sediment  losses were also
low because of a lack of intense rains,
averaging 2.6 t/ha from row-crops
and 0.9 t/ha from the watershed as a
whole. Soluble chemical losses (NH4-
N, NO3-IM, PO<-P, Cl  and TDS) in
surface  runoff were less than that
deposited with rainfall. Because IMO3-
N, Cl and TDS were concentrated in
subsurface drainage, losses from the
watershed as a whole due to stream-
flow (surface plus subsurface drainage)
were significantly larger than losses
from surface runoff alone.
  Average annual pesticide  losses
from the field were least for the
shortest-lived herbicide (0.2% of that
applied) and  greatest for the most
persistent (1.6%). No runoff event
occurred within a week of application.
On the basis  of percentage applied,
losses or export from the watershed as
a whole were about 25% of the losses
from the two individual fields studied.
With the exception of the strongly
adsorbed paraquat, at least 80% of the
losses occurred in the water phase as
opposed to that adsorbed on sediment.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Environmental Research
Laboratory. Athens. GA, to announce
key findings of the research project
that is fully documented in a separate
report of the  same title (see Project
Report ordering information at back).

Introduction
  Concern about  potential pollution
from agricultural  land drainage and
associated land erosion has increased
due to some recent trends in agriculture.
Increases in intensive row-crop farming,
higher fertilizer application rates, and

-------
 larger areas treated with pesticides tend
 to increase the nonpoint source pollution
 potential.  Other trends, however, such
 as increasing use of conservation tillage
 and less persistent pesticides, should
 reduce the pollution  potential  from
 agricultural lands.
   During  the past decade, environ-
 mental scientists  and engineers have
 accepted  simulation  modeling  as a
 technique for  predicting  effects of
 weather and  management changes on
 the  quality of  agricultural drainage
 water.  Using relatively  limited site-
 specific information, simulation models
 can provide required water  quality
 management information, for the con-
 trol of nonpoint pollution in a  specific
 watershed.  These models, however,
 must be calibrated and verified using
 data from carefully monitored water-
 sheds. Although some water flow and
 quality  data are often  available from
 either  small areas, e.g., plots, or large
 river systems, comprehensive data sets
 that define areal and temporal changes
 from the field to the stream are rare.
   The  primary objective  of the study
 summarized here was to collect data on
 stream hydrology and on  sediment,
 nutrient, and pesticide transport from
 field to stream for intensively cropped
 agricultural watersheds, ranging in size
 from a few hectares to about 50 km2,
 and at the same time provide additional
 understanding of the physical and
 chemical processes  occurring that
 influence chemical losses.
   The  study area was located in the
Dipper  portion of the Four Mile Creek
 watershed in northwest Tama County,
 Iowa (Figure 1).  Data were collected for
 the crop years 1976 to 1978, for small (5
 to  6  ha)  pasture, corn and soybean
 fields,  for two larger mixed-cover
 watersheds, and at three stream stations.
 Soil profile sampling on the three fields
 was performed to determine the amounts
 (concentrations) and location (depth of
 migration) of nutrients and pesticides as
 a function of time.

 Results
   Table  1  presents a summary of
 inventory data for the Four  Mile Creek
 watershed for the three  years of the
 study and includes data from a previous
 study  (1970) for comparison. It is
 obvious that the watershed was being
 more intensively farmed during  this
 later study, with 55% of the area m corn
 and 22% in soybeans, with nearly all the
 row-crops receiving  herbicides. In
 addition, 73% and 97% of the corn was
                                             A  Gaging Station
                                             •  Rain Guage Location

                                             •°- Weather Station
                                      Field
                                      Site 2
Figure 1.  Four Mile Creek watershed instrumentation.
Table 1.     Four Mile Creek Watershed Inventory
                          1970
 1976
1977
1978
Corn (% area )
fertilized (%)
N (kg/ ha)
P205 (kg/ ha)
herbicide (%)
insecticide (%)
Soybeans (% area)
fertilized (%)
P20s (kg/ha)
herbicide (%)
40
87
115
59
71
54
17
10
69
75
55
98
159
55
99
58
20
12
49
94
54
97
166
62
98
80
24
24
58
95
55
97
174
57
98
80
22
14
55
97
the pasture, which averaged 9 mm/yr of
treated with insecticides and fertilizer,
respectively. Nine herbicides accounted
for over 95% (by mass) of the herbicide
used; five  insecticides accounted  for
over 98% of the insecticides. About  1%
of the watershed was terraced; a few
farmers used  conservation tillage,
contouring and strip-cropping. Table 2
presents a summary  of precipitation,
flow,  sediment and soluble  chemical
data.  Precipitation during the study
averaged 92% of normal;  in  one 12-
month period,  the study area received
only 56% of the average annual precipi-
tation. Average annual stream-flow
from the whole watershed  was 124
mm,  26 mm  below  the  long  term
average  of  about 150  mm.  Surface
runoff from the two, small, row-cropped
fields averaged 36 mm, of which over 50
was snowmelt The same was found  for
surface runoff. Annual sediment yield
from the  pasture, soybean  and corn
fields averaged 0.03, 1.3 and 4.5 t/ha,
respectively. Sediment loss  or  export
from the whole watershed of 50 km2,
averaged  0.9 t/ha.  No really severe
storms occurred during the  study
period.
  In  general, concentrations of  NH4-N
and PC>4-P were higher in surface runoff
water than in subsurface drainage; the
reverse was found for N03-N, Cl  and
TDS. Average surface  runoff losses
from pasture, corn, and soybean fields
of all dissolved chemicals were less than
the amounts deposited by precipitation.
The amounts of NOa-N, Cl, and TDS lost
annually with  the streamflow  which
included shallow  subsurface drainage
and base flow as well as surface runoff,
were equal to or  greater  than  the
amounts  deposited in  precipitation

-------
Table 2.
Nutrients and Sediment in Precipitation, Surface Runoff. Tile, and Creek Flow

Precip.
Year
1976
1977
1978
Amount
mm
554
828
878
NHA-N
ppm kg/ha
.78
.87
.78
4.20
7.20
6.85
NOyN
ppm kg/ha
0.8
1.0
0.8
4.1
8.3
6.8
P04-P
ppm kg/ha
.054
.028
.063
.290
.230
550
Cl
ppm kg/ha
1.5
1.5
2.0
8.2
12.5
17.6
TDS Sediment
ppm kg/ha ppm kg/ha
33
51
50
179 — —
420 — —
439 — —
Runoff
Corn:
Site 2
Site  1
Site 2
     1976
     1977
     1978
51.3
11.9"
47.3
 .42
2.66
 .43
.22
.32
.20
5.3
0.7
3.0
                    2.7
                    01
                    14
 .047
 .819
 .112
  024
  097
 .053
 2.1
 7.6
 1 7
  1.1
  0.9
  0.8
165
134
 58
85
16
27
10210  5387
43373  5558
 5173  2488
Soybeans:
Site 1
Site 2
Site 1
     1976
     1977
     1978
58.6
 0.9
46.4
 .09
 .06
 .24
.05
.11
3.5
0.2
1.7
                    2.1
                    0.8
 .029
 046
 .349
 .017
<001
 .162
 7.3
 0.9
 8.0
 43
<0 1
 37
134
 83
 80
78
 1
37
 4739
20457
 1869
2779
  180
 867
Pasture:
Site 3
     1976
     1977
     1978
 13.1
                          6.1
 .20
 .62
 .54
.03
.05
.03
0.8
04
05
                    0.1
1 154
  898
1.051
  .151
  .078
  .064
 4.0
 1.7
 3.2
  0.5
  0.1
  02
133
 56
 89
 17
  5
  5
   305
   312
    79
   40
   27
    5
Tile drainage
Intra basin
Site 7§
284 ha

Site 8§
149 ha
     1976
     1977
     1978
     7376
     7377
     7S7S
     7376
     7377
     7375
 6.7
 2.6
32.7
 89
 9.2
42.0
.11
.13
.10
 .02
1 00

 .22
 .71
.32

.02
.30
                     10.2
                     14.0
                     13.4
0.5
3.0
                  <0.1
                    1.0
                            .069
                            .116
                            .102
 .173
1.361
 .004
 .437
0.9  <0.1
3.7    1.5
                           .174   .016
                           .570   .240
                                  144
                                  20.2
                                  17.9
 3.6
 90

 2.3
10.0
  0.1
  2.9

  0.2
  4.2
                                         330
                                         352
                                         312
108
148

 68
115
 3
47

 6
48
  992
  585

 7966
 2029
   26
  188

  736
  852
Creek
Site 6§
345 ha

Site 5§
3575 ha

Site 4
5055 ha


1976
1977
1978
1976
1977
1978
1976
1977
1978

13.1
69.9
250.5
13.5
52.1
203.5
122.7
43.6
197.4

.02
.14
.15
.02
.40
.38
24
.23
.37

<01
.10
.38
<01
.21
.77
.29
.10
.74

5.8
11.2
11.3
5.8
11.6
12.5
7.9
10.0
11.0

0.8
7.8
28.3
0.8
6.1
255
9.7
4.4
21.6

.029
.201
149
.027
.299
.161
066
.114
.107

.004
.141
.374
004
.156
.328
.081
050
.212

11.0
12.0
13.2
179
23.1
17.1
12.1
17.3
15.3

1.4
84
33.0
2.4
12.1
34.7
148
7.6
30.1

317
306
280
349
434
308
277
330
278

42
214
703
47
226
627
333
144
549

59
602
793
52
182
793
1274
171
509

8
421
1988
7
95
1614
1564
74
1004
*40% of this runoff occurred within 24 h of fertilizer application and incorporation.
t-4 very localized rain caused 98% of this runoff.
§0nly one sample taken on sites 7 and 8; limited number on sites 5 and 6 since flow monitoring began 5/29/76 for these sites.
(particularly greater for NOa-N). The
amounts of NH4-N and PO4-P lost with
the annual stream flow were still less
than  the  amounts deposited with
precipitation. Concentrations of N and P
associated with sediment were some-
what dependent on the concentrations
of sediment in runoff; the higher the
sediment concentration, the lower the
nutrient concentration in the sediment.
On average, about 2 kg of N and 1 kg of P
were lost per tonne of sediment
                               The herbicides alachlor, metribuzin,
                             and paraquat were soil applied without
                             incorporation at planting to the soybean
                             field. Similarly,  propachlor, cyanazine
                             and paraquat were  applied to the corn
                             field. Spray, filter paper, and  soil tests
                             were run  to determine the  amounts
                             actually applied. At no time during the
                             three-year study did  a runoff event
                             occur within one week of application,
                             and therefore, runoff losses were low
                             As shown in Table 3, losses ranged from
                                                       0% to 3.2% of the herbicide applied The
                                                       least losses occurred with the shortest-
                                                       lived herbicide, propachlor; the greatest
                                                       losses occurred  with the longest-lived
                                                       herbicide, paraquat Soil core samples
                                                       taken  during  the  growing  season,  in
                                                       addition to providing information on
                                                       persistence, showed that the pesticides
                                                       essentially remained in the top 7.5 cm of
                                                       the  soil  With the exception of the
                                                       strongly adsorbed  herbicide, paraquat,
                                                       over 80% of the herbicide runoff losses

-------
Table3.
Year
1976

1977

1978

Percentage of Applied Herbicides Lost
Site Alachlor Metribuzin
field
4 mi watershed
field
4 mi watershed
field
4 mi watershed
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.0
0.0
04
0.1
Propachlor
0.2
0 1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.1
Cyanaz/ne
1.0
0.1
0.005
0.0
0.8
0 1
Atrazine
_
0.2
0.0
0.0

0.3
Paraquat
3.2
1.0
02
00
1.4
0.1
occurred in the solution phase. Losses
of the herbicides with streamflowfrom
the whole watershed, on a percentage
of applied basis, were about 25% of the
edge-of-field losses.
  Stream cross sectional areas were
measured at several pointstodetermine
what portion of the total sediment load
could be attributed to bank erosion
and/or channel degradation  Compari-
son to areas  measured in a previous
study indicated that about 25% of the
sediment transported from the water-
shed came from the channel.

Conclusions

  • Snowmelt can be a  significant
    portion of annual surface runoff
    (averaged about 50%).
  • Recent tillage is an important
    factor  affecting rainfall-runoff
    amounts.
  • Good rainfall distribution data,
    areally and with time, are critical to
    runoff modeling.
  • Rainfall-runoff and sediment losses
    from grassland are very low (sedi-
    ment yield was less than 50 kg/ha
    yr'1).
  • For row-cropped watersheds, sedi-
    ment sizes and concentrations in
    runoff increase with rainfall inten-
    sity.
  • On  a relative basis, sediment size
    was coarsest in runoff directlyfrom
    the field and finest after passage
    through a good grassed waterway.
  • Streambank  erosion can account
    fora significant portion of sediment
    yield from the watershed (up  to
    25%).
  • Soluble nutrient amounts deposited
    in precipitation are significant (and
    in  this study are larger than)
    relative to losses in surface runoff.
  • Significant portions of NH4-N and
    PO-t-P losses can occur with snow-
    melt (in one year 75%).
  • Annual NO3-N losses, associated
    primarily with subsurface drainage,
    can be significant (up to 22 kg/ha).
  • Concentrations of PO4-P can exceed
    1.0 ppm  in  runoff  where  animal
  wastes, decaying vegetation and P
  fertilizer are deposited on the soil
  surface
  Nutrient losses associated  with
  sediment  usually exceed those
  associated with water.
  Pesticide losses are  usually less
  than 1% of that applied if a runoff
  event does not occur within one
  week of application.
  With the exception of very strongly
  adsorbed pesticides, the great bulk
  of pesticide loss takes place in
  solution
The limited data indicate a signifi-
cant attenuation of losses between
field and stream.
Work on methods of chemical
application to improve efficiency of
use and  to  decrease losses to
surface waters is  needed
Means  to implement improved
agronomic management practices
relative  to chemical use (amount
and timing) and their application
methods need to be devised (similar
to the means of implementation of
soil conservation practices)
H. P. Johnson andJ. L. Baker are with Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
Charles N. Smith is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The  complete report, entitled  "Field-to-Stream Transport of Agricultural
  Chemicals and Sediment in an Iowa Watershed. Part I: Data Base for Model
  Testing (1976-1978)," (Order  No. PB 82-254 046; Cost: $40.50. subject to
  change) will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Environmental Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        College Station Road
        Athens, GA 3O613

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
        PS   0000329
        U  S  ENVIK  PROTECTION AbENCY
        REGION  5 L18RAHY
        230  S DEAR80KN STREET
        CHICAGO 1L  60604

-------