vvEPA
                                                                                            
-------
lates and soluble materials are carried
downcurrent. Substantial dilution may
take place in the discharge pipe before
the mud is discharged.  Drilling mud
concentration,  measured   as  total
suspended  solids,  percent  transmit-
tance, or concentration of particulate or
soluble  mud-associated   metals,
decreases rapidly with distance from
the rig. Background values for total
suspended  solids  and  soluble/
particulate  metals  concentrations are
usually  reached within  100 to 1,000
meters (m)  downcurrent  of  the
discharge. Using ultratrace techniques
for particulate barium, it is possible to
trace a drilling mud plume for several
km.  Percent   transmittance  values,
indicative of fine  suspended clay-size
particulates, usually reach background
somewhat  further downcurrent than
suspended  solids  concentrations.  The
time required for the drilling mud plume
to  be  diluted  and  dispersed  to
background levels is 30 to 100 minutes.
  Rate of dilution  to background of
discharged  drilling mud  is affected by
the rate of  drilling mud  discharge,
current  speed  and  turbulence, water
depth  and   other  hydrographic
parameters.  Dilution  rate   can  be
controlled somewhat by controlling rate
of mud discharge and discharge pipe
design  and  position  in  the  water
column.
  Virtually all of the drilling mud solids
and some of the  soluble components
eventually are deposited on the bottom
under  and  downcurrent  from  the
discharge pipe. Maximum drilling mud
accumulation  on  the bottom  usually
occurs a short distance downcurrent
from the discharge. The most useful
tracer of distribution of drilling mud in
bottom sediments  is barium. Surficial
sediments (upper 1 cm) up to about 2 km
downcurrent  from the mud  discharge
may contain elevated concentrations of
barium.  Elevated   concentrations of
chromium, lead, and zinc may occur in
bottom sediments near the discharge.
Concentrations of  these  metals in
sediments  fall to  background  con-
centration at a much shorter distance
from the discharge than does sediment
barium concentration.
  The  major environmental concerns
about discharge of used drilling mudsto
the ocean are that they may be acutely
toxic  or cause deleterious  sublethal
effects  in  sensitive  organisms  and
ecosystems and  that  heavy metals
associated  with drilling  muds may be
accumulated  by  marine organisms to
dangerous concentrations.
  A  majority  of  major drilling  mud
ingredients are biologically inert or have
a very low order of acute toxicity. Of the
major  drilling mud ingredients,  only
chrome- and  ferrochrome-lignsulfonates
can  be considered  at  all toxic. Their
toxicity is quite  low to all  but a few
sensitive species (e.g.,  some corals).
Minor  ingredients of  some environ-
mental  concern  include sodium
phosphate salts, detergents, biocides
(chlorinated  phenols  no  longer  are
permitted  for  offshore  disposal),
chromate salts and asphalt/oil-based
ingredients. Ordinarily, these materials
are not used in large enough quantities
to cause concern. Their concentrations
should be kept  low in drilling muds
destined for  ocean  disposal.  Where
possible, less toxic substitutes should
be used.

Results and Conclusions
  To  date,  the   acute  toxicity  and
sublethal biological effects of more than
20 drilling  muds used offshore  have
been evaluated  with  more than  60
species of  marine  animals from the
Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf  of Mexico and
Beaufort Sea. Representatives of five
major   animal   phyla   were   tested,
including  Chordata, Anthropoda,
Mollusca,  Annelida,  and Echino-
dermata. Larvae and other early life
stages, and oceanic species (considered
to be more sensitive than  adults and
estuarine species to pollutant stress)
were included. In all but a  few cases,
acute toxicity, usually measured as 96-
hr.  LCso, was 10,000  ppm or higher
drilling mud added. The  lowest acute
LCso value was  500 ppm  for  stage  I
larvae  of dock shrimp Panda/us danae
exposed to a high density ferrochrome-
lignosulfonate drilling mud  from  Cook
Inlet,  Alaska. Chronic or sublethal
responses were observed i n a few cases
at concentrations as low as 50 ppm.
  Field studies of  drilling mud plume
dilution and  dispersion revealed that
drilling  mud concentrations  high
enough to cause  acute or sublethal
damage to the most sensitive species
and  life stages should occur only in the
immediate vicinity of the drilling mud
discharge (to  less than  1,000  m
downcurrent) and only for a very brief
time during bulk discharges (generally
less  than 2 hours). Therefore, we can
conclude that adverse impacts on water
column organisms of discharge of used
water-based drilling muds to the ocean
should  be  moderate  and  of  short
duration.
  Benthic fauna may be vulnerable to
damage from settling drilling mud and
cuttings  solids,  through  burial  or
chemical  toxicity.  Accumulation  of
drilling  muds  in  coarse   bottom
sediments   may   change   sediment
texture and thereby affect recruitment
to the benthos of planktonic larvae. At
environmentally  realistic  levels  of
drilling  mud  in  sediment,   species
composition of the benthic community
changes  toward  a more  silt/clay-
tolerant assemblage. The species most
sensitive to drilling mud in the water or
sediments appear to be very sensitive
high suspended particulates concentra-
tions. Limited field studies indicate that
recovery of  the  benthic community
from any effects of discharged drilling
mud is likely to be very rapid (within a
few months).
  Heavy metals associated with drilling
muds have a very limited bioavailability
to marine  animals. Chromium is  the
most  bioavailable   of  the  mud-
associated metals. Accumulation from
drilling  mud  of  small  amounts of
barium, lead, cadmium  and copper was
demonstrated a few times when marine
animals  were  exposed  to  high
concentrations   of  drilling  muds or
drilling mud ingredients. Field studies in
the vicinity of drilling mud discharges
have not  provided any  convincing
evidence  of metal  accumulation by
resident marinefauna. More research is
needed on the long-term bioavailability
to benthic marine organisms of metals
from sediments  comtaminated with
realistic amounts of used drilling muds.
  Discharge   of   used  water-based
drilling  fluids to the ocean or exposed
coastal  waters, where rapid dispersion
and  dilution are possible, poses no as
yet measurable hazard of more than
very localized and transitory impact on
the marine  environment.  Even in  the
small temporal and spatial domain in
which  an  adverse impact  can  be
observed or predicted, damage is likely
to be of a low order of magnitude and
restricted primarily to the  benthos.
Metals  associated  with  used drilling
fluids have a very limited bioavailability
to marine organisms, so there is little
danger of food-web transfer or biomag-
nification of mud-associated metals to
commercial  fishery species  or  Man.
These conclusions apply to standard or
typical  water-based   drilling  fluids

-------
currently in use for exploratory drilling
in  U.S.  coastal  waters  and  outer
continental shelf. Higher  modified or
specialized   mud  formulations  or
completely   new  formulations  or
ingredients that might be introduced
may behave  quite  differently in the
marine environment than the majority
of drilling muds evaluated to date.
  Jerry M. Neff is  with  Battelle New England Marine Research Laboratory.
    Duxbury, MA 02332.
  Thomas M. Duke is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  The complete report, entitled "Fate and Biological Effects of Oil Well Drilling
    Fluids in the Marine Environment: A Literature Review," (Order No. PB 82-
    240 391; Cost: $16.50, subject to change/ will be available only from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
          Environmental Research Laboratory
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Gulf Breeze, FL 32561
                                                                                   > UB. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1962-559-017/0803

-------
United States                           Center for Environmental Research                                        Fees Paid
Environmental Protection                 Information                                                             Fnuirnnmental
Agency                                Cincinnati OH 45268                                                    Protection
                                                                                                              Agency
                                                                                                              EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

-------