xvEPA
                                  United States
                                  Environmental Protection
                                  Agency
                                  Environmental Sciences Researe*fc,
                                  Laboratory                 '^4,
                                  Research Triangle Park NC 2771 l£r
                                                              f i
                                  Research and Development
                                  EPA-600/S3-82-080 Dec. 1982
Project  Summary
                                  Method  for  Measuring
                                  Carbon  Fiber Emissions
                                  from  Stationary Sources

                                  W. M. Henry, C. M. Melton, and E. W. Schmidt
                                    Carbon fibers are  small, highly
                                  conductive,  and lightweight. When
                                  released as emissions from produc-
                                  tion, manufacturing, processing and
                                  disposal sources, they are readily
                                  airborne and  can be dispersed over
                                  wide areas. Because of their high
                                  electrical conductivity, carbon fibers
                                  settling out of the atmosphere onto
                                  electronic or electrical components
                                  can cause malfunctions and damage.
                                  This research program was initiated to
                                  develop techniques to identify and
                                  measure carbon fiber concentrations
                                  emitted from manufacturing,
                                  processing, fabricating and incinerat-
                                  ing sources. The overall objective of
                                  the  research  was  to develop  a
                                  measurement  method  to meet
                                  possible emission source regulations.
                                    Because fiber count, fiber size range,
                                  and  total fiber mass concentration
                                  were required,  a method  based on
                                  light microscopy was selected for test
                                  and development.
                                    Experimental work, carried out on
                                  laboratory  and  field  site samples,
                                  showed that  carbon fibers could be
                                  readily  recognized and  counted
                                  without extensive  separation from
                                  other particulate "debris" collected
                                  during  source  sampling.  Although
                                  fibers were reduced in diameter during
                                  oxidative and thermal processes such
                                  as incineration, the size reductions
                                  were not beyond the resolution power
                                  of light microscopy.
                                    The method was tested on samples
                                  collected from  various  stationary
                                  emission  sources and on  samples
                                  collected from a pilot-scale in-house
                                  incineration facility and the results of
                                  these  emission  measurements  are
                                  reported.
                                    This Project Summary was developed
                                  by  EPA's Environmental Sciences
                                  Research Laboratory,  Research
                                  Triangle Park,  NC, to announce key
                                  findings of the research project that is
                                  fully documented in a separate report
                                  of the same title (see Project Report
                                  ordering information at back).


                                  Introduction

                                    The rapidly developing use of carbon
                                  or graphite* fibers incorporated  into
                                  resin matrix composites is a  potential
                                  environmental  problem.  Present
                                  generation fibers are small in diameter
                                  (typically 5 to 15 ^im), and very light-
                                  weight (1.5 to 2 g/crn3); they are
                                  chemically inert and are excellent elec-
                                  trical conductors. Therefore, when the
                                  fiber filaments are separated from their
                                  composite  forms, they  are readily
                                  airborne and can be transported long
                                  distances   by   normal  atmospheric
                                  motion. The principal environmental
                                  concern is the  potential of  released
                                  fibers to settle out of the atmosphere
                                  onto  electrical and  electronic
                                  *The term "carbon fibers" is used in this report to
                                   include both carbon and graphite fibers resulting
                                   from pyrolysis of fibrous materials which have
                                   been heat treated to temperatures higher than
                                   the decomposition temperature of the precursor
                                   polymer (typically  1,000 to 1,200°C for carbon
                                   fibers and above 2,000°C for graphite fibers)

-------
components, causing short circuits and
arcing  and  damagirj  or destroying
equipment. Manufacturers, processors,
and  fabricators of carbon fibers and
composites are aware of these potential
hazards and take measures to minimize
fiber emissions. Despite these control
measures, fibers  are released during
fiber manufacture, composite formation
machining and grinding, and other
fabrication and processing operations.
Additional fiber contamination hazards
can  occur during waste disposal of
consumer goods by incineration, which
can  thermally decompose the matrix
material  and release fibers  into the
atmosphere via stack emissions.
  While current production and use of
carbon fiber composites (estimated as
less  than 500 T in 1980) may present
only a limited hazard, large increases in
demand   are foreseen  for these
lightweight,   high-strength  materials,
especially in the automotive and aircraft
industries to  achieve fuel savings via
weight reductions. For this reason, the
Federal  government  has   instituted
various programs to study all aspects of
carbon fiber  production, usage, and
disposal. The research project described
herein  is one of several  initiated by the
U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
(EPA).  The risk  potential for carbon
fibers  released  to the  atmosphere is
relatable to the size range, number, and
mass of fibers emitted.  In this study,
fibers with a length-to-diameter ratio of
5:1  were of primary concern, although
the research  showed that particles of
lower  length-to-diameter ratios could
be identified and counted readily.

Conclusions and
Recommendations
  Studies of available analytical tech-
niques for measuring carbon fiber emis-
sions from stationary sources indicate
that  light microscopy will provide the
necessary fiber mass, number, and size
range data.
  Since extraneous particulate matter
collected with carbon fibers  does not
interfere  with   the  carbon  fiber
identification  measurements,  rigorous
separation procedures are not required.
Still, separating the carbon fibers from
other particulate matter might reduce
the  time  required  for  analysis and
improve the  accuracy and precision of
the method; for that reason, the use of
cyclones  preceding  a   filter  backup
sampling  system  warrants  further
investigation.
  Although sampling methodology was
not  explored  in  depth,  the use  of
membrane   filters  as  a  collection
medium  may  be  warranted.  The
membrane filter can be readily removed
from the collected particulate prior to
microscopy with the use of simple nitric
acid  digestion treatment. For sampling
at  incineration  sites,   where   a
membrane filter is not thermally stable,
the use of cyclones preceding a quartz
or glass  filter  results  in  most of the
carbon fiber emissions being collected
in the cyclones and in the probe portion
of  the  sampling  systems,  thus
simplifying  the  measurement
procedure.
  If  necessary to support  regulatory
actions on carbon fiber emissions, the
methodology  is compatible  with the
personnel  skills  and  equipment
available at most Federal  and local
regulatory  and  industrial  testing
laboratories. As with any newanalytical
technique based  on microscopy (even
light microscopy),  the   skill  and
experience of the operator is paramount
in obtaining reliable data. To establish
precision  and  accuracy   data,  the
method  should  be  evaluated   by
intercomparisons  among several
laboratories.
  The  field site  and  incinerator
emission data  in  the  final  report are
among the first such  data available, and
should be  useful in  guiding control
practices and risk evaluations of carbon
fiber emissions.

Procedure and Results
  The field sampling procedure involved
drawing  the fiber-laden air through
high-efficiency filters  with  a vacuum
pump.  A cellulose acetate  (Millipore)
filter (pore size = 5.0 urn; diameter = 47
mm) was used.
  Light  microscopic   analyses  were
performed over a  selected radial filter
area; typically, one-eighth of the47-mm
filter  area  was analyzed. All  carbon
fibers observed in the  radial section
being  analyzed   were  counted  and
individual lengths and widths were
measured. These  data were combined
with the known  sampling times  and
flow rates  to calculate fiber number
concentrations.   The   corresponding
mass concentrations were calculated as
follows: mass concentration = (number
concentration) • (average fiber volume
[determined by length and width meas-
urements]) •  (an  assumed  density of
1.85g/cm3).
  Table 1 summarizesthedata obtained
from  the various field samples.  The
carbon  fiber  concentrations  ranged
from 100 ng/m3 to 5500 ng/m3.
  In all samples  the fiber width  was
relatively constant, but the fiber length
varied greatly from process-to-process
and was widely  distributed within a
given sample.
  For the field samples analyzed, no
treatment to  remove extraneous
particulates  was  required,  a  result
which  can  be  expected  for  most
emission samples from noncombustion
processes.  Treating  the specimen in
boiling  HN03 (or another appropriate
treatment)  would be  necessary  only
when the NIOSH  clearing method does
not  produce  a specimen suitable for
light microscopy.  The  NIOSH clearing
method  is a  standard procedure for
asbestos  analysis  and  involves
dissolving the Millipore filter in a 1:1
mixture of diethyl oxalate and dimethyl
phthalate.
 Table  1    Carbon Fiber Analyses of Field Collections
Operation
Winding™
Prepregging ""
Shuttle Loom Weaving
Machining1^
Machining
Rapier Weaving™
Average
Length
(fjim)
69.5
213.1
749.4
30.9
32.8
706.0
Average
Width
(»m)
6.5
6.1
6.7
6.6
6.2
3.9
Number
Concentration
(fibers/m3)
46
24
88
823
1.212
340
Mass
Concentration
(ng/m3)
482
356
5,497
2.062
2,812
6,831
(a) A verage of four samples taken in work area.
"" Unless otherwise noted, all samples are of outside emissions.
lcl Work area sample.
ldl Outside ambient, downstream of baghouse. Some fibers appeared damaged.

-------
  A  stoker-boiler  designed  and
constructed  to  study  combustion
processes   was  used  to   simulate
combustion conditions likely to occur in
a municipal incinerator. After reaching
a steady-state combustion rate of 75
Ib/h  of  refuse, 1  Ib of carbon fiber
composite  was fed onto  the burning
hearth over  a 1-min period and the
combustion continued for 60 min.
  Sampling employed two simultane-
ous modes  of  collection: a  Source
Assessment  Sampling System (SASS)
train using three  cyclones preceding a
filter, and a Method 17 (in-stack) filter
sampling system. The Method 17 filter
was changed every 15 min in order to
provide  information  on  the rate of
carbon fiber emissions with time. Care
was taken to maintain an  isokinetic
sampling period.
  The samples consisted of three types:
(1)  bulk  paniculate brushed from the
cyclone catches, (2) cyclone and probe
washings   deposited  on  DM-450
(Gelman) filters,  and (3)  Method 17
samples and the SASS train collections
on  quartz  (2500  OAST)  filters. For
analyses of the incineration samples,
the basic sample preparation consisted
of sonicating the weighed  bulk sample
and/or  filter  in a  measured volume
(~10 ml) of filtered deionized water for
15  min. Twenty-five milliliters  of hot
(180°F) concentrated  nitric acid were
added  to destroy extraneous organic
materials  in the sample  that  might
interfere with the microscopic analysis.
After  cooling  to  room  temperature
(25°C),  the  nitric  acid mixture  was
diluted to 1000 ml  and redeposited in
aliquots of 100, 200, and 700 ml  on SM
Millipore filters  (pore size = 5.0 /urn;
diameter = 47 mm). When thoroughly
dry, each  deposit-bearing filter  was
transferred to a glass slide (2x3 in). The
sample  was then  cleared using the
standard  NIOSH  solution  (dimethyl
phthalate and diethyl oxalate at 1:1 plus
0.5 g/ml Millipore  filter) and covered
with either glass cover slips or slides.
  Analysis was performed by screening
samples  and original  quartz filters at
250 to 400X magnification on a Leitz
Orthoplan microscope with transmission
objectives.
  The analysis showed that fibers are
oxidized  during incineration and  that
the widths  are reduced,  resulting in
width variations.  When they are not
oxidized (as in the aforementioned field
samples),   fiber  widths  are   quite
uniform.  Oxidation of  carbon  fibers
during incineration occurs nonuniformly.
                                        700
                                      I
producing dimples or notches  in the
fibers. In the laboratory, it was noted
that  as  oxidation   proceeds,  each
notched fiber is cut in two at the site of
the notch,  leaving fibers of relatively
short length  and pointed ends. Thus,
most  oxidized fibers of small diameter
also are relatively short.
  Table 2  shows  the results  of the
incineration study in terms of emission
rates.  The  total   emission  rates    p /o
measured  by the SASS train  (55.6    u
mg/dscm particulate; 0.998 mg/dscm   ;§
carbon fiber) agree quite well with those
measured  by  Method  17  (73.0
mg/dscm particulate; 0.840 mg/dscm    4>
carbon fiber), given the nature of the   ,£
experiment. Inspection of the Method    c
17  emission  rate data also reveals a   -2
decay in fiber emission rate with time as   -S3
would be  expected   considering the   ^ 1.0
single-point  (with  respect to  time)
introduction of the fiber composite into
the stoker.  This phenomenon is shown
graphically in Figure 1. The carbon fiber
emission  rates display a  nearly
exponential decay in time, whereas the
total  particulate  emission  rate   is
constant  within  normal  operating
bounds.
  Table 3 is a breakdown of the results      0.1
by individual sample.  It is interesting to           -15
note that nearly all of the carbon fibers
(99.6%) were captured in the first two
cyclones,  whereas  only  a relatively      Figure  1.
small  portion  (17.1%)   of the total
particulate  matter was  collected  by
these  cyclones. This  pattern  is not
surprising,  given the   aerodynamic
diameter  of  these carbon  fibers
(approximately   twice  the  physical
diameter given  in Table 1, or 10 /urn).
This observation suggests that cyclones
may be used to separate  the carbon
fibers  from  extraneous  particulate
material, thus facilitating analysis.
Table 2.    Incineration Test Emissions Rates
                                                 Relatively Constant
                                                 Rate of Total Emissions
                                                 60 ± 20%
                                                                 ///,
                                                     Decreasing Rate of\
                                                     Fiber Emissions   I
                                                    0
                                       Fibers Introduced
15  30  45  60
 Time, minutes
                                                    Rates of carbon fiber and
                                                    total particulate emissions.
Sample
SASS Train
Method 1 7
Pretest
0-15 min
15-30 min
30-45 min
45-60 min
Nozzle Rinse
Total Method 1 7
Sample
Volume
(dscm)
7.88

0.295
0.293
0.291
0.287
0.286
1.452
1.452
Total
Particulate
(mg/dscm)
55.6

57.6
63.8
70.1
52.6
47.7
14.6
73.0
Carbon Fiber
(mg/dscm)
0.998

0.003
1.40
0.62
0.45
0.24
0.30
0.84
(fibers/dscm)
4310

—
—
—
—
—



-------
    Table 3.    Results of Incineration Stack Sampling



Sample
SASS Train
10 urn Cyclone
3 fjm Cyclone
1 iim Cyclone
Probe
Filter

Total
Paniculate
fmg)

58.3
16.7
0.4
13.3
391.8

Carbon
Fiber
(mg)

6.33
1.50
0
0.03
0.0005

%
Carbon
Fiber

10.9
9.0
0
0.23
0

% of Total
Carbon Fiber
Sample

80.5
19. 1
0
0.4
0
Carbon
Average
Length
(fjm)

5534
1320
—
108
55
Fiber
A verage
Width
(fjm)

4.98
3.45
—
2.94
5.6
          Total SASS           438.2

    Method 17

      Pretest                    17.0
      0-15 min                  18.7
      15-30min                 20.4
      30-45 min                 15.1
      45-60 min                 13.6
      Nozzle Rinse               21.2

          Total Method 17       106.0
           7.86
           0.001
           0.41
           0.18
           0.13
           0.07
           0.43
           1.22
1.79
2.19
0.88
0.86
0.51
0.20

1.15
 0.1
33.6
14.8
10.7
 5.7
35.2
                                               W. M. Henry, C. M.  Melton, and E. W. Schmidt are  with Battelle Columbus
                                                 Laboratories. Columbus, OH 43201.
                                               Roy L. Bennett is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
                                               The complete report, entitled "Method for Measuring Carbon Fiber Emissions
                                                 from Stationary Sources," (Order No. PB 83-118 760; Cost: $8.50, subject to
                                                 change) will be available only from:
                                                      National Technical Information Service
                                                      5285 Po£ Royal Road
                                                      SpringfieHf,  V'A 22161
                                                      Telephone: 703-487-4650
                                               The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                                                      Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory
                                                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                                      Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
                                                                     U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983	6S9-O17/O8E
                                    Postage and
                                    Fees Paid
                                    Environmental
                                    Protection
                                    Agency
                                    EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300


-------