United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Chesapeake Bay
Program
Annapolis MD 21403
Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-82-083  Dec. 1982
Project Summary
 Historical  Review  of
 Water  Quality and
 Climatic  Data from
 Chesapeake  Bay with
 Emphasis  on Effect of
 Enrichment
Donald Heinle, Christopher D'Elia, JayTaft, John S. Wilson, Martha
Cole-Jones, Alice B. Caplins, and L. Eugene Cronin
  Review of the available data on wa-
ter quality in Chesapeake Bay has re-
vealed changes over recent decades
caused by enrichment with nutrients.
In the upper and middle Bay, and sev-
eral tributaries, concentrations of al-
gae present during the summer months
have increased since the mid-1960s.
There have been decreases in the clar-
ity of the water associated with in-
creased algal stocks. Nutrient concen-
trations have  also increased, phos-
phorus more notably so than nitrogen.
In some of the tributaries, such as the
Patuxent for which we have the most
historically complete data, increased
algal production has led to reduced
concentrations of oxygen below the
halocline in the middle part of the estu-
ary. The variations in concentrations
of oxygen are now more extreme in
surface waters than in the early 1960s
in the  Patuxent. Oxygen concentra-
tions in  the  open  Bay have not
changed greatly, with the possible ex-
ception of extreme conditions, as dur-
ing  periods of extensive ice cover.
There have been historical variations
in the abundance of commercial fishe-
ry stocks that may be closely related to
climatic variations.  From 1969 to
1980, however, stocks of many ana-
dromous species and marine spawn-
ers representing higher trophic levels
have declined to new long-time lows.
The principal exceptions are menha-
den (marine-spawning planktivorous
fish) and bluefish  (marine-spawning
top predators). That same time inter-
val has, however,  been a period of
above average rainfall  and corre-
sponding reduced salinities in the Bay,
making  conclusions concerning ef-
fects of enrichment difficult to achieve.
  This Project Summary was devel-
oped by EPA's Chesapeake Bay Pro-
gram. Annapolis. MD, to announce
key findings of the research project
that is fully documented in a separate
report of the same title (see Project
Report ordering information at back).

Introduction
  Enrichment of Chesapeake Bay wa-
ters by nutrients from sewage treatment
plants and agricultural and urban runoff
emerged as a major water quality issue
during the 1950s. Population growth
and the related changes in land use, the
increasing reliance on secondary treat-
ment of municipal  wastes, and the

-------
centralization of sewage treatment
services in the region's growing urban
centers all contributed to increased
nutrient loadings in some segments of
the Chesapeake  Bay,  particularly the
upper  Potomac River and Baltimore
Harbor. By 1960 blue-green algae were
creating  nuisance conditions in the
upper Potomac, and problem quantities
were common in northern sections of
the Bay ten years later.
  The  relationship between nutrient
loadings from various sources and algae
production have  been  reviewed by  a
number  of  Bay-area scientists,  but
trends  and the extent of water quality
changes   have  not been  thoroughly
documented. This report, sponsored by
the Environmental Protection Agency's
Chesapeake Bay Program (Grant No.
R806189010),  includes  a historical
review of Chesapeake Bay water quality
and climatic data and documents
nutrient-related changes that have
occurred. The emphasis is on the effects
of enrichment by the major nutrients in
sewage,  nitrogen and phosphorus.
Climatic cycles are examined as well as
the effects  of one unusual climatic
event, Tropical Storm Agnes.

Procedure
  Temperature and rainfall data appli-
cable to  the  Chesapeake  Bay region
were compiled and examined for long-
term trends and possible relationships
to the 20 year solar cycle. Fluctuations
in annual mean water temperature
were analyzed to determine the general
trends  and the frequency of extremely
cold winters.  Rainfall  and freshwater
flow data for the Bay proper and major
tributaries were examined to determine
cyclic trends and nutrient input factors.
The frequency and intensity of  major
storm events  were  also examined and
compared to  detailed  data  describing
the effects of Tropical Storm Agnes. All
precipitation  data  were used in the
analysis  of short-term variations  in
freshwater flow. Long-term flow trends
were determined by analysis  of fixed
point salinity data.
  The  scientists  developed estimated
nutrient  input values for  municipal
wastewater treatment facilities cur-
rently on-line and rated as capable of
providing secondary  treatment. The
loading figures for each major tributary
in the  Chesapeake Bay Basin (shown
below)  are based on  the  assumption
that every  one million  gallons  of
secondary effluent contains 73.8 pounds
of phosphorus and 182.6 pounds  of
nitrogen.  The estimated total  point
source loadings, based  on  permitted
flow, for the entire basin are included in
Table 1.
  Flow data and an inventory of known
point sources were used to produce the
baseline estimates for flow in the drain-
age basin and the  percentage of flow
that  is treated sewage effluent.  (See
Table 2.)
  Trend analysis was based on a review
of demographic statistics,  land use
changes, and water quality data, the lat-
ter gathered by a number of organiza-
tions  involved in sampling  of Chesa-
peake Bay waters as far back as 1940.
All data, unless  clearly erroneous  or
suspect were used. The  investigators
attempted to document all  analytical
techniques,  identify data  sources and
senior scientists, and discuss the validi-
ty and comparability of various analyti-
cal techniques.

Results/Conclusions
  Many of the Chesapeake  Bay water
quality changes, particularly in the
tributaries, occurred prior to implemen-
tation of pollutant discharge permit and
monitoring programs called  for by the
1972 Federal Water Pollution Control
Act.  Trends  for historic problem  areas
are difficult to identify, but data clearly
indicate nutrient loadings are  increasing
in historically enriched areas and
throughout the Bay. Phosphorus load-
ings are increasing at a more rapid rate
than nitrogen, possibly because of the
use  of  phosphorus compounds  in
detergents.

  Carbon loadings are also continuing
to increase despite  efforts to upgrade
solids removal capabilities at municipal
wastewater treatment facilities. Remov-
al capabilities were  improved  between
1960 and 1969 through construction of
secondary treatment modes at public
wastewater  treatment systems. Total
carbon  loadings  have, however,  con-
sistently increased throughout  the
1970s. Improved removal capabilities at
sewage treatment systems have been
outpaced by increases in  regional
population and increases in the percent-
age of population serviced by centralized
treatment.

  The population increases and related
land  use changes have  not  been
uniform throughout the region. The
lower Susquehanna River  Basin,  for
example,  experienced  a 10 percent
growth  rate  between 1960 and 1970.
The population  in the Patuxent River
Basin nearly doubled during this same
period.  Effluent  discharged to  the
Patuxent rose at a more rapid rate than
the population,  increasing from  2.6
million gallons a  day (mgd)  in 1963 to
26.6 mgd by 1973.
Table 1.    Point Source Loadings for the Chesapeake Bay Basin
                              Nitrogen
                Phosphorus
River
Susquehanna
Patuxent
Potomac
Rappahannock
York
James
Chesapeake Bay
(including
tributaries)
Kg day'1
28,841
2,203
38,864
795
323
16,151

108,916

1069 yr"1
70,527
804
14,185
290
118
5,895

39,754

Kg day'1
12,061
890
14,495
321
131
6,528

44,020

106g yr-1
4,402
325
5,290
117
48
2,383

16,067

Table 2.    Baseline Estimates for Flow and Its Percentage of Sewage Effluent in the
            Chesapeake Bay Drainage Basin
River
Susquehanna
Patuxent
Potomac
James
Chesapeake Bay
27 -yr average
flow (cfs)
38,800
1.085'
13,900
10,100
75,200
Point sources
of sewage (cfs)
557
41.15
670
302
2.034
Percent of freshwater
that is sewage
1.4
3.8
4.8
3.0
2.7
1 Patuxent flows were taken from the Johns Hopkins University (1966) rather than the
U.S. Geological Survey Data.

-------
  Changes in  Chesapeake Bay  water
quality  attributable to land use and
demographic changes are not uniformly
distributed throughout the Bay.  Upper
Bay phosphorus concentrations, variable
and seasonal in the past, have increased
and are now relatively uniform all year.
Nitrogen  concentrations have also
increased, but some of the increased
loadings appear to be passing through
the nutrient pool or are  lost  through
denitrification.  Nitrogen appears to be
the limiting nutrient in the upper Bay,
but low light  intensity in this  turbid
region could be restricting algae produc-
tion. Overall,  algae production  has
increased.
  The effects of nutrient enrichment in
the middle Bay  are modest but early
signs of change are present. Current
phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentra-
tions are  slightly higher than historic
measurements and primary  algae
stocks show signs of increased produc-
tion. Dinoflagellate blooms are now
common and  some  data  suggest that
the deep water dissolved oxygen mini-
mum  is changing. The effects  of the
altered  dissolved oxygen regime  on
remineralization from sediments are
significant  and  may  be driven  by
particulate organic  matter deposition
rates.
  The lower Bay is relatively unaffected
by nutrient inputs although phosphorus
concentrations have increased slightly.
The  negligible increase in nutrient
levels may be  attributable to  dilution,
which is significant in this region due to
the massive exchange of  water  at the
mouth   of  the  Bay.  Another  possible
explanation is  that nutrients are being
trapped and utilized in upper sections of
the Bay. If light  restricts algae production
in these upper regions, the nutrients
might begin to progress further down
the Bay and stimulate algae production
there. Increases  in  algae productivity
are now  being  observed below the
Potomac River.
  Concentrations of both major  nu-
trients and chlorophyll a have increased
in all  parts of  the Patuxent River  and
demonstrate  a distinct downstream
progression. Ambient concentrations in
the upper, turbid portion are relatively
high all year. Although chlorophyll a has
increased somewhat, light  may  be
limiting  primary  production. Low dis-
solved oxygen concentrations in the
upper Patuxent appear related to high
concentrations of particulate carbon,
not chlorophyll.  Both nutrient and
chlorophyll concentrations have  in-
creased in  the  lower  river  segments.
Dissolved oxygen levels in the surface
waters are increasingly variable and
extended periods  of  near  anoxia  in
bottom waters are now being observed.
Patuxent plankton demonstrate a high
dependence on recycled nitrogen during
summer months, which  suggests that
restricting total  annual input may limit
primary production. The changes now
being observed in the river will probably
progress further  as loading  rates
increase with population growth in the
basin.
  Changes  in the upper Potomac cannot
be  documented because  dissolved
oxygen and  algae problems were
present before systematic sampling
programs were put  in  place.  Algae
production  is increasing  in the lower
reaches,  however,  and major changes
might occur next nearthe upper limits of
salt intrusion.
  The Rappahannock  and York  Rivers
have  both  experienced increases in
phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentra-
tions. Trends for nitrogen  cannot  be
determined. Minimum dissolved oxygen
concentrations in the lower York bottom
waters have decreased, but secondary
effects have not been thoroughly
studied. Periodic anoxia  in the lower
York has resulted in cyclic changes in
rates  of  remineralization from sedi-
ments.
  Conditions in the upper James are
similar to those in the Potomac. Historic
conditions and  changes are not well
documented so trends  could  not be
determined. Concentrations  of  both
major nutrients have increased in the
lower James, but there has not been a
concurrent increase in chlorophyll a.
Low dissolved oxygen  levels in bottom
waters have been observed recently,
but trends cannot  be established.
Recommendations
  Natural dissolved  oxygen regimes
have been altered by nutrient inputs to
some segments of the Chesapeake Bay.
Enrichment problems are occurring in
some areas of the Bay but  are  not
apparent throughout most of the estuary.
Prudent, conservative management can
prevent continued degradation.
  Sensible  efforts  to reduce  nutrient
inputs  should continue.  Projected
population projections for the watershed
and  present evidence  suggest there
could be continued  changes  on  the
ecology of the Bay unless strategies for
reducing nutrient inputs, such as land
application  of  municipal sewage,  are
sought and pursued.
   Donald Heinle. Christopher D'Elia, Jay Taft, JohnS. Wilson, Martha Cole-Jones,
     Alice B. Caplins, and L Eugene Cronin are with the University of Maryland,
     Solomons, MD 20688.

   Thomas Pheiffer was the EPA Project Officer (for information,  see contact
     below).
   The complete report, entitled "Historical Review of Water Quality and Climatic
     Data from Chesapeake Bay with Emphasis on Effect of Enrichment," (Order
     No. PB 82-265 471; Cost: $19.SO, subject to change)  will be available only
     from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield,  VA 22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
   For information contact David Flomer at:
          Chesapeake Bay Program
          2083 West Street, Suite 5G
          Annapolis, MD 21403

-------
                                                            U,B, POVERNMENT MINTING OFFICE:  1982—659-O17/O872
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300
             PS   0000329
             U  S  ENVIK  PRQTtCTION  AbElNCY
             REGION  5 LIBRARY
             230  S  DEARBORN  STRtET
             CHICAGO  IL 606U4

-------