United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Chesapeake Bay
Program
Annapolis MD 21401
Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-83-080  May 1984
Project  Summary
Intensive  Watershed Study:
The  Patuxent  River  Estuary


Charles Bostater, Diane McCraney, Stephanie Berlett, and David Pushkar
  This study was one of five intensive
watershed  studies designed  by  the
Chesapeake Bay Program's Eutrophica-
tion  Work Group to provide detailed
non-point source export rates and
ambient water quality data within the
Chesapeake Bay drainage area.
  The study was conducted within the
Patuxent Estuary Watershed and con-
sisted of estuarine slack tide surveys.
intensive 24-hour water quality surveys,
primary productivity measurements,
sediment oxygen demand and sediment
nutrient flux measurements,  phyto-
plankton and nitrifying bacterial longi-
tudinal  surveys,  non-point  source
monitoring at five subwatersheds,
current speed and direction measure-
ments, as well  as  rainfall quality and
quantity measurements.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Chesapeake  Bay Program,
Annapolis, MD,  to announce key
findings of the research project that is
fully documented in a separate report of
the same title (see Project Report
ordering information at back).

Introduction
  This study was one of five watershed
studies funded by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay
Program. The study was designed to
provide non-point source chemical export
data for typical subwatersheds within the
Chesapeake  Bay Basin,  as well as to
provide  information concerning the
ambient concentrations of nutrients
within the tidal river and estuary of the
Patuxent River  Basin. This estuarine
system was chosen for study by the State
of Maryland, Department of Natural
Resources and  the Chesapeake Bay
Program because of concern for main-
taining an economically important fishery
and  shellfish industry. Recent reports
have indicated that land  use activities
have increased nutrient enrichment. The
Patuxent Basin has experienced greater
population  increases and land use
changes than most other watersheds
within the  Chesapeake  Bay system.
Therefore, a research monitoring study
was  selected for this  basin in order to
provide additional information for man-
agement of  its  water and biological
resources.
  The results of the study have been used
by the Chesapeake Bay Program for
developing baywide non-point source
(NPS) data  used for calibrating the
Chesapeake Bay Basin Non-Point Source
Model and for characterization of the
nutrient enrichment  of the Patuxent
estuary, relative  to other subestuaries
within the Chesapeake Bay Basin. Data
from this study are currently being used
for water quality modeling purposes  by
other programs.
  This report constitutes an initial interpre-
tation to date  of what  is the most
intensive study of this estuarine system.
Careful documentation  of the data
collection efforts has been included in this
report for future nutrient enrichment and
habitat assessment evaluations.

Monitoring Program
  Estuary and tidal  river sampling
stations were monitored between June
1980 and August 1981, This program
included 17 slack water surveys and two
24-hour surveys. Figure 1  indicates the
locations  of the sample sites.  The
intensive water quality surveys (IWQS)
were designed to provide information
concerning lateral and vertical homogene-
ity of water column variables, as well as

-------
                         South River
WXTOO45
Western
BRWW
Nottingham tS PXT0402
   XED949oli:°wer Marlboro
        Patuxent River
         0123 Miles
                       RT4
 Figure 1.    Mainstem of Patuxent River and
            Estuary showing locations of
            major sampling stations.

 temporal  changes  within  several tidal
 cycles. All data were stored in STORET.
 Variables  measured included stage
 height, current velocity, wind, light
 penetration, pH, dissolved oxygen, tem-
 perature,  relative humidity, secchi disc,
 chlorophyll-a, pheophytin, BOD5, BOD 20,
 total organic  carbon, dissolved  organic
 carbon, chemical oxygen demand, total
 persulphate phosphorus, orthophospho-
 rus,nitrate,  nitrite,  total  suspended
 solids, dissolved reactive silicate, ammonia,
 alkalinity, and chlorides.  Separate moni-
 toring included additional measurements
 of sediment oxygen demand, total partic-
 ulate  nitrogen, total paniculate  carbon,
 and sediment nutrient  fluxes.  Several
 longitudinal surveys were conducted in
 order  to  determine the  genera and to
 some  degree, the species of algae along
 the estuary.
   Five subwatersheds  in the basin were
 selected for measurement of chemical
 export representing non-point source
 contributions from the land surface
 during rainfall events. Chemical export
 measurements were determined for
 ammonia,  nitrate  plus nitrite, total
 nitrogen,  total phosphorus, orthophos-
 phorus, BOD5, BOD30, total suspended
 solids, total organic carbon,  chemical
 oxygen demand and alkalinity. Four
 subwatersheds  were predominantly
 agricultural and one was an undisturbed
 forested site. The subwatersheds ranged
 in size from 34 to 144 acres, with three
 sites in the coastal plain province and two
 sites in the piedmont province. Samples
 were collected using  automated flow-
 compositing techniques and equipment.
 Flow control devices, (H-S flumes or V-
 notch weirs) were installed at each site.
 At each site, a recording tipping bucket
 raingauge was installed. All  equipment
 was run  by installation of alternating
 current  electricity. Agricultural sites
 were dominated by corn and tobacco or
 field corn and pasture  land uses.
                                         Results and Summary
                                           Data collected during this study indi-
                                         cate that the Patuxent estuary sediment
                                         oxygen  demand  measurements are
                                         among the highest values measured and
                                         reported in the literature (Figure 2)*. High
                                         sediment oxygen  demand is a classical
 •D-Elia, C.F., et al., 1981. Benthic Nutrient Studies
 on the Lower Patuxent River, Final Report, DNR
 Contract #39753.
     Patuxent River
 Selby Landing 80-8 J
      Jones Pt 79-80
      Potts Pt 78-79
      Potts Pt 79-80
           example of secondary impacts from
           nutrient enrichment.
             Nutrient budgets were calculated from
           the data collected during this intensive
           study in order to indicate to managers and
           researchers the potential major sources
           of nutrient  enrichment.  The results of
           these budgets shown in Figures 3 thru 7
           indicate the major sources of nutrient to
           the  estuary during this study. Data
           indicate  the major sources  of total
           nitrogen are from fluvial sources at  Rt.
           50,  followed by the lower  estuary
           sediment flux and NFS loads. The data
           also indicate that there is a net exchange
           of total nitrogen put of the estuary. Figure
           4 shows the dissolved NO2 + N03 budget.
           This budget indicates  that  the largest
           source to the estuary is also from fluvial
           sources  above Rt. 50, followed by the
           source from Chesapeake Bay.
             The ammonia budget (Figure 5) indicates
           that the sediment flux  in the upper and
           lower river  may be the greatest source
           followed by the source from Chesapeake
           Bay. The total phosphorus budget (Figure
           6) indicates that the lower  estuary
SOD Rates in a Variety of Estuarine Ecosystems
   Buena Vista 78-79
   Buena Vista 79-80

     Marsh Pt 73-80

     Marsh Pt. 80-81
     Jacks Bay 80-81
Broomes Island 80-81
  Softerly Point 80-81
 St Leonard Cr. 80-81

  Other Ecosystems
     Sublittoral Area
     Georgia
       Brackish Lake
        Louisiana
     New York Bight

     Chesapeake Bay
          Maryland
    Narragansett Bay
       Rhode Island
   La Jolla California

      Carstle Harbor
          Bermuda
         Long Island
          New York
   Sea Loch Scotland

        Puget Sount
         Washington
                                                                                        -Q-
                                       -B-
           -Q-
             -Q-
                                       Q	V9.7
                 -B-
                                Sediment Oxygen Demand fgO2m~1d''lJ
 Figure 2.    Sediment oxygen demand rates in estuarine systems compiled by D'Elia, et al. for
            this study.

-------
 sediment flux and non-point sources in
 the lower estuary may be the same order
 of magnitude and represents the largest
 sources. The dissolved orthophosphorus
 budget indicates that  the lower estuary
 sediment flux and fluvial sources above
 Rt. 50 are the major sources followed by
 the potential source  from  Chesapeake
 Bay.
   Theoretical conservative  mixing dia-
 grams also  indicate potential sources of
 nutrients in the estuary. These diagrams
 indicated high variability from month to
 month  but  on a  seasonal  and annual
 basis trends were apparent. A mid to
 lower estuary  peak was observed from
 station averages for orthophosphorus,
 total phosphorus, and silica conservative
 mixing diagrams. These diagrams support
 the view,  as well as the  phosphorus
 budgets that a source of phosphorus to
 the estuary water column exists  in the
 area of the turbidity maximum.
   The estimated flushing time of the tidal
 river and estuary is around 315 days. This
 information,  in  conjunction with  the
 dissolved nitrogen conservative  mixing
 diagram, indicates  that  the estuary
 serves  as a sink for most of the  fluvial
 nitrogen. Conservative mixing diagrams
 for nitrate, nitrite, and dissolved nitrogen
 also indicated a sinkof nitrogen in the mid
 to upper estuary and a source near the
 mouth of the estuary.  If this is the case,
 one would expect high sediment-nutrient
 fluxes of inorganic nitrogen,  especially
 ammonia, due to remineralization of
 organic matter,  and  associated high
 sediment oxygen demand due to settling
 out and resulting decay of organic
 material. The budget for ammonia (Figure
 5) indicates a major source of ammonia in
 the estuary  is from the sediments.
  Data  also  indicate that  ammonia
 behaves as  a conservative substance in
the water column, except in the  lower
 estuary where a source is indicated (due
to higher bottom concentrations).  Thus,
the fate of nitrogen introduced into the
estuary appears to be that it remains in
the system for a relatively long period and
is probably remineralized by sedimentation
and biological  processes, yielding high
ammonia concentrations  in bottom
waters.
  Thus, the role that sediments play in
 regulating water column concentrations
 in the  Patuxent  estuary appears  to be
 important, as reported by other studies.
 As part  of this  study,  D'Elia  et al.
 calculated that the sediments may supply
 approximately  30% of the daily  phyto-
 plankton demand for water column
 ammonium. This fact also indicates that
              Net Exchange is
 16.05 X 1(f Ibs (20.9%)       T
 from C. Bay to the Estuary
1
>
i


 Figure 3.
Figure 4.
 Western Branch WWTP^
 3.83 XI0s Ibs. (5.0%)   \

                                 Atmosphere 1.13X105 Ibs. (1.5%)


                                         Fluvial Sources Above Rt. 50
                                           Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                            21.23XI0*Ibs. (27.7%)
                                           Storm Events 3.42 X 1O* Ibs.
                                            (4.5%)

                                       * Fluvial Sources Below Rt. 50
                                           Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                            4.89 XI0s Ibs. (6.4%)
                                         Storm Events 5.43 X 10s Ibs.
                                            (7.1%)
                        Sediment Flux
                          Upper River 2.02 X  10s Ibs (2.7%)

                          Lower River 18.56X 105lbs. (24.2%)

 Patuxent Estuary estimated total nitrogen budget for April thru October.
   Western Branch
   1.41 XI0s Ibs. (4.8%)

                                  Atmosphere 0.89 X 10s Ibs. (3.1%)

                                           Fluvial Sources Above Rt. SO
                                             Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                              13.97X1'O5 Ibs. (47.8%)
                                             Storm Events 1.06 X 10s Ibs.
                                              (3.6%)
                                          , Fluvial Sources Below Rt. 50
                                             Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                              1.62 X 10sIbs. (5.6%)
                                           Storm Events 1.68 X 70s Ibs.
                                              (5.7%)

                          Sediment Flux
                            Upper River -1.98X 10s Ibs (-6.8%)

                            Lower River 0.46 X 10s Ibs. (1.6%)

Patuxent Estuary dissolved NOi + NOa budget for April thru October.
               Net Exchange is
 10.12 X 10s Ibs (34.6%)
 from C. Bay to the Estuary
I
*•


            Western Branch WWTP ^
            0.68 XI0s Ibs. (1.7%)
              Net Exchange is
6.60X10s Ibs (16.0%)
from C. Bay to the Estuary
                                           Atmosphere 0.12 X 10s Ibs. (0.3%)
                                         Fluvial Sources Above Rt. 50
                                          Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                        >  5.67 XI0s Ibs. (13.8%)
                                          Storm Events 0.33 X W* Ibs.
                                           (0.8%)
                                                   * Fluvial Sources Below Rt. 50
                                                      Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                                       0.38 XI0* Ibs. (0.9%)
                                                    Storm Events 0.53 X /0s Ibs.
                                                       (1.3%)
Figure 5.
                                   Sediment Flux
                                     Upper River 8.74 X 10s Ibs (21.2%)

                                     Lower River 18.1 X 10s Ibs. (44.O%)
                                                     Patuxent Estuary dissolved NH3 budget for April thru October.

                                                                                   3

-------
the sediments  may  be responsible for
controlling water column concentrations
occasionally.
  A typical concern in estuarine manage-
ment is  determination of the  limiting
factors to plant or algal production.
Although temperature is one of the most
dominant controlling factors, knowledge
of the controlling nutrient has been used
to help focus management scenarios for
point and non-point source nutrient
controls.
  Unfortunately, the limiting nutrient
affecting plant production is not consis-
tent spatially  and  temporally which
makes management strategies difficult to
develop  as well as  to determine their
effectiveness. An  evaluation  of the
redfield ratio (N/P ratio) was conducted
using data collected during this  study.
This analysis showed that the apparent
limiting nutrient varies longitudinally as
well as monthly. A  multiple regression
analysis indicated that approximately 75%
of the variability of the redfield ratio could
be  explained  by location (i.e.  nautical
mile), salinity, timing of the survey to the
previous storm event and characteristics
which describe the size of the previous
storm event, i.e. peak daily CFS, average
daily CFS during storm event, and sum of
daily CFS from beginning to the end of the
storm. From this  analysis,  as  well as
examination of the data, it can be inferred
that storm events and their associated
export of nutrients cause pulses of
nutrients to enter the estuary, which in
turn determine the limiting  nutrient.
From a  management  perspective,  this
clearly shows the need for considering
the effect of storm events and associated
chemical export from land use activities
on  the  management of  the estuarine
resources. It also supports the fact that
nutrient limitation would be poorly
estimated from steady state eutrophication
models.
  One measure of the suitability of an
aquatic habitat for fisheries and shellfish
production is the  level of dissolved
oxygen needed for growth and reproduc-
tion. The effects of nutrient enrichment
can be expressed in the dissolved oxygen
found in the water column. One effect of
increasing nutrient enrichment should be
observed through low dissolved oxygen in
bottom  waters. Historical dissolved
oxygen  measurements (approximately
5,000) were collected from historical
reports and  studies conducted  in the
mainstem Patuxent River. Statistical
analyses were  performed  in order to
determine trends.  A  mean dissolved
oxygen deficit occurred throughout the
mainstem estuary. Monthly average
           Western Branch WWTP,
           0.65 XI (fibs. (3.9%)
           Net Exchange is
0.45X 10s Ibs (2.7%)        "^
from C. Bay to the Estuary
I1
b
*
i

                                          Atmosphere 0.25 X J 0s Ibs. (1.5%)
                                        Fluvial Sources Above Ftt. 50
                                         Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                          3.46X1'0sIbs. (20.7%)
                                         Storm Events 2.62 X 103 Ibs.
                                          (15.7%)

                                      • Fluvial Sources Below fit. 50
                                         Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                          0.81 X 10s Ibs. (4.9%)
                                       Storm Events 4.16 X 10s Ibs.
                                          (24.9%)
                      Sediment Flux
                        Upper River - 0.56 X W* Ibs (3.3%)

                        Lower River 3.76 X 10s Ibs. (22.5%)
Figure 6.    Patuxent Estuary total phosphorus budget for April thru October.
         Western Branch
         0.31 X 10* Ibs. (4.4%)
          Net Exchange is,
-0.03 XI 0s Ibs (-0.4%)
from C. Bay to the Estuary
                                       Atmosphere 2400 Ibs. (0.3%)
Figure 7.
                                     Fluvial Sources Above Rt. 50
                                      Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                     2.23 X 10s Ibs. (31.3%)
                                      Storm Events 7,200 Ibs. (1.0%)

                                    ' Fluvial Sources Below Ftt. 50
                                      Avg. Freshwater Inflow
                                        10,300 Ibs. (1.4%)
                                 ^  Storm Events 11.500 Ibs. (1.6%)

                    Sediment Flux
                     Upper River -0.56X10s Ibs (7.7%)

                     Lower River 3.76X10s Ibs. (52.7%)

Patuxent Estuary dissolved orthophosphorus budget for April thru October.
summer deficits are around 2 mg/l with
a maximum average deficit around 2.3
mg/l in September. The mean dissolved
oxygen deficit is around 3 mg/l in the
lower river (10-24 ppt salinity) at depths
greater than  30  feet.  Yearly mean
dissolved oxygen plots show no apparent
trends for the  entire  river. However, a
strong trend towards lower dissolved
oxygen is observed for a river segment
above the Western  Branch  tributary
based upon seasonal mean dissolved
oxygen. A low dissolved oxygen trend is
observed when  historical  dissolved
oxygen deficits are regressed for the
upper estuary. A similar trend is indicated
in the lower estuary when all values are
regressed versus time, although it is not
as apparent as in the upper estuary. A
detailed  analysis of  dissolved oxygen
                              deficits categorized by months,  depths
                              and time of day clearly showed the lack of
                              consistent monitoring in the estuary,
                              especially in deeper waters in the lower
                              estuary where dissolved oxygen reaches
                              anoxia level. Lack of consistent historical
                              measurements indicates ambiguous
                              results when  more  detailed statistical
                              analyses of dissolved oxygen deficits are
                              performed.
                                The relative importance of freshwater
                              flow effects on  nutrient concentrations
                              was examined by conducting regression
                              analysis between station  nutrient con-
                              centrations,  surface to bottom salinity
                              differences,  and  transformations of
                              average freshwater inflow before the
                              estuarine water quality  surveys. This
                              analysis was performed to indicate the
                              effect of  advective processes on  water

-------
 column stratification. The results of this
 analysis indicated that  stratification at
 each station may be uniquely controlled.
 In addition, water column stratification
 (indicated by surface to bottom salinity
 differences) and freshwater inflow
 explained approximately 50% of  the
 variability of nutrient concentrations.
 Further analyses should be performed to
 more fully explain dominant physical
 processes at different  longitudinal sta-
 tions.
   The relative importance of NFS loads to
 the basin is  indicated  by the nutrient
 budgets. The NFS chemical export data
 indicated that the predominant NFS loads
 of total phosphorus and total nitrogen
 may come from agricultural lands (Table
 1). These data are consistent with other
 estimates. Table  2 shows the  ratio of
 agricultural to forested chemical export
 during storm events. Data from this study
 indicate that total phosphorus is six to
 seven times higher in agricultural runoff
 than from forested land runoff.  Total
 suspended  solids (representative of
 suspended sediment)  was  five times
 higher in agricultural runoff than in the
 forested site monitored in this study.
   Fluvial sources  above Rt. 50 are the
 major source of NOi + NOi with Chesa-
 peake Bay being the major source. Non-
 point  source export of ammonia on  a
 basin-wide basis  appears insignificant.
 Total phosphorus NFS export is indicated
 as the major source to the  estuary as
 shown in Figure 6. NFS chemical export
 of orthophosphorus   is insignificant
 compared to the  sediment flux in the
 estuary.
   The duncan multiple  range test was
 applied to the data for characterizing zones
 of chemical  similarity.  This test clearly
 shows  river  segments which  have
 relatively unique concentrations. In many
 cases, this analysis identified the surface
 water concentrations as a uhique class in
 the turbidity maximum region of the
 estuary. Unique zones were identified in
 the turbidity maximum region for silica,
 salinity,  BOD5, total  suspended  solids,
 and total organic  carbon. Unique zones
 were  identified in the lower estuary for
 surface water pH; bottom water alkalinity
 and chlorophyll-a  near the mouth of the
 estuary; and silica in bottom water and
 surface  water at the  mouth of  the
 estuary. It is interesting to note a unique
 zone in the lower  estuary was identified
 for dissolved oxygen  and dissolved
 nitrate.  This  zone showed the lowest
 average concentrations for both dissolved
 oxygen and dissolved nitrite. This zone or
 region of the estuary occurs downstream
'of the mid-estuary sill.  This zone is also
Table 1.
Estimated A verage Potential Watershed Chemical Export for Total Phosphorus During
Storm Events to the Patuxent River Basin
Land Use Activity
Agricultural
Forested
Other (i.e. residential,
commercial, industrial,
and idle)
All Activities
Estimated
Acres In
Basin*
205,743
272,738
58,843
537,324
Potential
Load
Ib/yr.
532.813
104,131
37,574
674,518
Loading
Rate
Ib/acre/vr
2.5897
.3818
1.180
Source
this study
this study
*
"Provided by Maryland Department of State Planning.
Table 2.





Variable
BODS
BOD30
TSS
/VO2
N03
NO2NO3
NH3
TKN
TKND
TPHOS
TPHOSD
DPO,
TOO
COD
ALKLIN
Relative Comparison of Estimated
Average Agricultural to Forested
Wastershed Chemical Export
Ratio of average
Agricultural to Average
Forested Export f/b/acre/
inch of rain)
2.7
2.3
5.2
0.3"
1.6
4.2
3.2
3.0
1.8
6.8
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.8
3.6
"Suspect data due to holding time and analy-
 tical procedure used.

the region where lower estuary dissolved
oxygen  values have  historically been
close to zero. Observations from the slack
water survey data indicate that this may
also be  a  region of upwelling of anoxic
bottom water due to a combination of
advective and tidal mixing. The existence
midriver of the sill (near nautical mile 25)
as well as the fact that the rate of change
of water depth increases in  this area,
makes the region susceptible to upwelling
phenomena.  Plots of temperature and
salinity  profiles in this region of  the
estuary  indicated inversions,  i.e. higher
salinity and lower temperature in surface
waters. High  chlorophyll-a values in this
region of the lower estuary may also be
due to upwelling of nutrient rich bottom
waters. Dinoflagellates (cells/ml) increase
in this  region where  upwelling  may
predominate under certain mixing condi-
tions. The  predominance  of  marine
dinoflagellates in the region just below
the apex of the midriver sill and upstream
of the bottom water D.O. minimum, as
well as  vertical instability of  the water
                               column,  is one  of the most  interesting
                               findings  of the study. Figure 8 (a and b)
                               shows that  low dissolved oxygen has
                               historically occurred downstream of the
                               region where upwelling processes are
                               indicated.
                               Conclusions
                                Data  collected and  initially analyzed
                               under this grant indicate that a trend
                               exists for lower  dissolved oxygen above
                               Western Branch, based on a seasonal
                               analysis. Fluvial inputs (including point
                               source  loads)  represent the greatest
                               sources of NOa + NOs, orthophosphorus,
                               total  nitrogen,  and total phosphorus.
                               Simple nutrient  budgets indicate Chesa-
                               peake Bay may be a major source for N0z+
                               NO3(34.6%), NH3(16%)andtotal nitrogen
                               (20.9%). A significant source of total
                               phosphorus from NFS chemical  export
                               (40% of  the  total) to the estuary  is
                               indicated. The data suggest that upwelling
                               of lower estuary water, rich  in nutrients
                               from  sediment-nutrient fluxes  may be

-------

8.
!§•
c *•
1
5
18.
0 <°
"8,
Q

8
0
Year 1936(aJ

x
x
X „ X
X K X
x xx *xs,2 ,,*« xx

*;*„ *
X * » X
X X
X
X
.00 6.00 12'00 18.00
                                            Year 1980(b)
                                         o.oo
               Salinity (ppt)
       6.00     12.00
          Salinity(ppt)
                                                                     raoo
Figure 8.   Historical dissolved oxygen versus salinity for years 1936(a) and 1980(bl in the
           Patuxent Estuary.
responsible for episodes of high chloro-
phyll-s in the lower estuary.

Recommendations
  • Investigations should continue to
    determine the future trends of lower
    dissolved  oxygen in the  upper
    estuary.
  • A statistically based monitoring
    program  should  be  established
    around Sheridan point and above, in
    order to determine if historically low
    dissolved  oxygen  is increasing in
    extent and frequency of occurrence.
  • The above monitoring  should be
    coupled with dynamic monitoring in
    order to determine to what extent
    lower estuary high chlorophyll-a
    may reflect periods and processes
    related to upwelling of bottom, and
    nutrient rich  waters, characteristic
    of phytoplankton derived from Ches-
    apeake Bay.
  • Continued monitoring of sediments
    and sedimentation is necessary for
    developing a baseline of SOD and
    Sediment Nutrient Fluxes.
  • Once completed, the variability over
    time with respect to SOD  and
    Sediment Nutrient Fluxes should be
    monitored to determine the dominant
    processes involved, as well as the
    effectiveness of point and non-point
    source controls.
  • Monitoring of dissolved oxygen in
    oyster bed areas will  be needed to
    determine if these living resources
    are being impacted by point or non-
    point source land use activities and
    low dissolved oxygen.
  • Data collected during  this study
    should be used to calibrate and
  validate a real-time model of water
  quality and hydrodynamics.
  Real-time hydrological simulation
  modeling will be needed in order to
  prioritize subwatersheds in the
  basin for applying best management
  practices. Data from this  study
  should be used for this purpose.
Charles Bostater, Diane McCraney, Stephanie Berlett, and David Pushkar are
  with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Coastal Zone  fC-2),
  Annapolis, MD 21401.
James Smullen is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Intensive  Watershed Study: The Patuxent River
  Estuary." (Order No. PB 83-251 470; Cost: $64.00. subject to change) will be
  available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield. VA22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Chesapeake Bay Program
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        2083 West Street. Suite 5G
        Annapolis, MD 21401

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
                                                                                             U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984-759-102/985
                                                                                                4

-------