United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Environmental Research
Laboratory
Duluth MN 55804
                   Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-83-097 Jan. 1984
SERA         Project Summary
                   Toxicological  Studies with
                    Herbicides,  Selected  EPA
                    Priority  Pollutants and  Related
                    Chemicals  in Aquatic
                    Organisms
                   Daniel J. Call, Larry T. Brooke, Raymond J. Kent, Nasim Ahmad, and Joseph E.
                   Richter
                     Toxicological studies were conducted
                   in two areas: (1) the toxicity, biocon-
                   centration potential and metabolism of
                   five herbicides in fish;  and (2) the
                   toxicity and/or metabolism of priority
                   pollutants and related chemicals in
                   various aquatic organisms.
                     The test herbicides included alachlor
                   [2-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N- (methoxy-
                   methyl) acetanilide], bromacil (5-
                   bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil), din-
                   oseb [2-(5ec-butyl)-4,6-dinitrophenol],
                   diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1 -
                   dimethylurea], and propanil (3,4-di-
                   chloropropionanilide). Acute toxicity
                   (through 192 hr), early life-stage
                   toxicity (58-64 day), and bioconcentra-
                   tion studies were conducted with
                   fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas)
                   in Lake Superior water. Herbicide
                   metabolism was investigated in rainbow
                   trout (Salmo gairdneri] both in vivo and
                   in vitro.
                     Twenty-two chemicals from the EPA
                   priority pollutant list were studied for
                   their acute and/or chronic toxicity to
                   selected freshwater organisms. These
                   included 1,2-dichloroethane,  1,1,2-
                   trichloroethane,  1,1,2,2,-tetrachloro-
                   ethane,  tetrachloroethylene,  1,2-
                   dichlorobenzene, 1,3-dichlorobenzene,
                   1,4-dichlorobenzene,  hexachloroben-
                   zene, hexachlorobutadiene, di-n-butyl-
                   phthalate, pentachlorophenol, hep-
                   tachlor, chlordane, toxaphene, arsenic*3,
                   chromium*6,  lead+2, mercury+2, nicker2.
silver*', selenium*4, and cyanide. Fresh-
water species tested included the
fathead minnow, rainbow trout, bluegill
sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). flagfish
(Jordanella floridae). Daphnia magna.
scud (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus),
midge (Tanytarsus dissimilis) and green
alga  (Selenastrum capricornutum).
Toxicity tests were also conducted with
pentachloroethane, hexachloroethane,
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, pentachloro-
benzene, methanol and dimethylforma-
mide. The uptake by fish  of di-n-
butylphthalate from water, its metabo-
lism and elimination were investigated.
Comparative  metabolism of 1,1,2-
trichloroethane, chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-
trichloroethylene, chloroform, and
carbon tetrachloride was studied in rain-
bow trout and Daphnia.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Environmental Research
Laboratory, Duluth. MN. to announce
key findings of the research projects that
are fully documented in separate reports
of the same title  (see Project Report
ordering information at back).


Introduction
  Many different agricultural and indus-
trial chemicals enter aquatic ecosystems
each  year.  For the protection of aquatic
biota, it is important to evaluate the
hazard potential of these chemicals.
Toxicological studfes collectively repre-

-------
sent one component of a hazard evalua-
tion scheme.
  Extensive toxicological investigations
have been carried out for only a small
fraction of the thousands of chemicals in
production. Generally, the most extensive
aquatic toxicological  data bases have
been generated on a select few chemicals,
where a combination of use, production
volume, frequency of occurrence in water
and/or biota, environmental persistence,
and known adverse effects have dictated
a need for toxicological data.
  It is important to develop data bases on
such chemicals  to  the extent that
judicious environmental risk documents
can be prepared. The major focus of this
research project consisted of toxicological
studies on  individual  chemicals where
data bases were considered insufficient
for hazard evaluations.

Methodology
  Flow-through toxicity tests with  fish
and scuds were conducted in proportional
diluters using either Lake Superior water
or dechlormated city water. Toxicity tests
with Daphnia magna  were static tests
using Lake Superior water in which the
toxicant solutions were renewed at 24 hr
intervals. Midge acute toxicity tests were
conducted in chambers in which toxicant
solutions in Lake Superior water were
continuously replaced from reservoirs
above the test chambers at a slow  drip
rate.
  In  the acute tests, observations were
made  at  selected time intervals for
mortalities and gross behavioral effects.
LCso and ECso values were calculated by
several methods (trimmed Spearman-
Karber,  probit, moving average, or
binomial) depending upon the character-
istics  of the data. In the fish early  life-
stage toxicity tests, observations were
made for mortalities, abnormal develop-
ment, and growth. Data were analyzed by
one-way analysis of variance in conjunc-
tion  with Dunnett's procedure to deter-
mine "no-effect" concentration ranges
In Daphnia chronic life-cycle  studies,
observations were made of  mortalities,
number of offspring  produced,  and
growth. Data were analyzed to determine
"no-effect" concentration ranges.
  Algal toxicity tests were run in flasks
under  uniform conditions of light, tem-
perature, and aeration.  Dry weights were
measured after 96 hr of exposure, and the
concentration that inhibited growth by 50
percent was determined by the trimmed
Spearman-Karber method.
  Studies on uptake,  bioconcentration,
elimination, and metabolism of  selected
organics  in fish  and  Daphnia were
conducted  using 14C radiolabeled com-
pounds. Five herbicides  (alachlor, brom-
acil, dinoseb, diuron, and propanil)  and
the plasticizer, di-n-butylphthalate, were
studied in  fish. The compounds 1,1,2-
trichloroethane, chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-
trichloroethylene, chloroform, and carbon
tetrachloride were studied for their
relative tendencies to be metabolized by
fish and Daphnia.

Results and Conclusions
  Results of the acute toxicity, early  life-
stage toxicity, bioconcentration  studies
for the five herbicides are summarized in
Table  1  Dinoseb  was  the most toxic
herbicide  on an  acute  basis, while
propanil was most toxic on the basis of a
longer exposure encompassing the early
lifestages.  Parent  herbicides  did  not
appreciably accumulate  in fish tissue.
Metabolism studies  indicated  that  fish
quite readily metabolized the herbicides.
Mass spectral analysis of extracts from
the bile of fish exposed to diuron  and
propanil aided in the characterization of
metabolites
  Toxicity data for EPA priority pollutants
are presented in Table 2. LC5o values
were not determined for hexachloroben-
                          zene due to insufficient mortalities at
                          concentrations  in water approaching
                          solubility.
                            Radiolabeled  di-/?-butylphthalate was
                          rapidly accumulated and metabolized by
                          fathead minnows. It was concentrated in
                          fish tissue approximately 600 times its
                          concentration in the water. The radiolabel,
                          which  consisted largely of metabolites,
                          was slowly eliminated from the fish upon
                          transfer to clean water.
                            Chloroform was more readily metabol-
                          ized in vitro by rainbow trout and Daphnia
                          than was carbon tetrachloride,  chloro-
                          benzene, 1,1,2-trichloroethylene or
                          1,1,2-trichloroethane. Metabolism  by
                          enzyme  systems from both species
                          resulted  in similar percentages  of total
                          14C that  were hexane-unextractable  for
                          carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, and
                          1,1,2-trichloroethylene. A greater per-
                          centage  of total 14C-chloroform was
                          hexane-unextractable with  the Daphnia
                          enzyme  system than with the trout
                          system; while the converse applied  for
                          1,1,2-trichloroethane. Higher percentages
                          of total 14C were protein bound with trout
                          systems  than with Daphnia systems  for
                          all compounds. Assays indicated that
                          both  species  possess  active  mixed
                          function  oxidase systems.
Table 1.    Toxicity and Bioconcentration Potential of Five Herbicides With the Fathead Minnow
Herbicide
  Acute Toxicity
 (96 Hr. LCso. and
95% C.I.. ma • L~'l
 Early Life-Stage Toxicity
 (58-64 Day "No Effect-
  Concentration Range.
	ua -Z.'V	
 Bioconcentration
	Factor
Alachlor
Bromacil
Dinoseb
Diuron
Propanil
  5.0(4.5-5.6}
  182(177-188)
  0.7 (0.6-0.7)
 14.2(13.4-15.0)
  8.6(7.7-9.5)
      520-1.000
         1.000
       14.5-48.5
       33.4-78.0
        0.4-0.6
       6X
     <3X
       1X
       2X
       2X

-------
Table 2. Toxicities of Selected EPA Priority Pollutants to Freshwater Organisms



Chemical
1,2-Dichloroethane
1, 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1. 1 ,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
"

Tetrachloroethylene/ DMF
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene

1 , 3 -Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Hexachlorobenzene/DMF
"
"
Hexachlorobutadiene

Di- n -butylphthalate
Pentachlorophenol
"
Heptachlor

Chlordane
Toxaphene
Arsenic*3


Arsenic *3
Selenium**
Chromium*6
"
Lead*2
"
Mercury*2
Nicker
Si/ver^
"
"
"
CAT



Organism
Daphnia magna
Daphnia magna
Daphnia magna
Daphnia magna
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Salmo gairdneri
Salmo gairdneri
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Salmo gairdneri
Daphnia magna
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Salmo gairdneri
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Salmo gairdneri
Lepomis macrochirus
Salmo gairdneri
Lepomis macrochirus
Daphnia magna
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
Selenastrum capricornutum

Daphnia magna
Selenastrum capricornutum
Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
Daphnia magna
Pimephales promelas
Jordanella floridae
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
Tanytarsus dissimilis
Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
Pimephales promelas
Daphnia magna
Tanytarsus d'ssimilis
Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
Pimephales promelas
Jordanella floridae
Tanytarsus dissimilis
/-Cso
Concentration
mg • L"1
(Test Duration)
268,315*
186,174*
62.1,56.9*
18.1,9.09*
308
4.99
5.84
12.0
1.58
7.43,7.23*
13.0
1.12
>H2O Sol.
>H2O Sol.
>H2O Sol.
0.320
0.324
3.7
46.0
0.280
0.0381,
0.0282t>-c
0.035
0.38"
0.875
1.54. 4.83"
14.2
14.4
42.5
57.3
0.0671
224
0.140
0.150
0.915
3.17
0.0045
0.0107
0.0092
2.36. 2.49"




(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)

(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
(48 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(96 hr)
(48 hr)
"No Effect-
Concentration
Range
mg • L'1
(Test Duration)
10.6-20.7
13.2-26.0
6.85-14.4
0.505-1.11





0.689-1.45















0.63-1.32
2.1-4.3
2.1-4.1





<0.00021











(28 days)
(28 days)
(28 days)
(28 days)





(28 days)















(28 days)
(30 days)
(30 days)





(35 days)






"Results from assays in which organisms were unfed and fed, respectively.
''Calculated concentration that inhibited algal growth by 50 percent.
cECso values for two separate tests.
"ECso values from assays in which organisms were unfed and fed, respectively.
"Expressed as HCN and free CN~, respectively.

-------
      D, J. Call, L T  Brooke, P. J. Kent, N. Ahmad, and J. E. Richter are with the
        University of Wisconsin, Superior, Wl 54880.
      John Teasley is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
      This Project Summary covers two reports, entitled:
          "Toxicity and Metabolism Studies with EPA Priority Pollutants and Related
          Chemicals in Freshwater Organisms," (Order No. PB 83-263 665; Cost:
          $14.50, subject to change)
          "Toxicity,  Bioconcentration,  and  Metabolism of Five Herbicides in
          Fresh water Fish,'' (Order No. PB 83-263681; Cost: $ 13.00, subject to change
      The above reports are available  only from:
              National Technical Information Service
              5285 Port Royal Road
              Springfield,  VA 22161
              Telephone: 703-487-4650
      The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
              Environmental Research Laboratory
              U S Environmental Protection Agency
              6201 Congdon Blvd.
              Duluth, MN 55804
                                                  *US. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE' 1984-759-015/7278
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
i i 11    x&n^s • U.S. OH: :Cf At MAIL
1111   X>*     >>\    .....  pr-jTi^q    i
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
                                                                                        rf,    .r.   <   ''>-r  •«  "••
                                                                                        FEt]  '•• 8 -\   I   K»7t ! = U  --  • j i    !
        CHICAGO

-------