United States
                  Environmental Protection
                  Agency
Atmospheric Sciences
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                  Research and Development
EPA/600/S3-85/033  July 1985
x>EPA         Project  Summary
                 Transport of  Pollutants in
                  Plumes and PEPES: A  Study of
                 Transport of  Pollutants in
                  Power Plant  Plumes, Urban  and
                  Industrial Plumes,  and Persistent
                  Elevated Pollution  Episodes
                  William M. Vaughan
                   Because of the increased concern for
                  the regional nature of secondary air pol-
                  lutants (e.g., sulfates, nitrates, ox\-
                  dants, and aerosols) the U.S. Environ-
                  mental Protection Agency (EPA)
                  sponsored a major field program in the
                  northeastern United States during the
                  summer of 1980. Two EPA field pro-
                  grams were actually carried out simul-
                  taneously. One, an outgrowth of prior
                  power plant plume studies, addressed
                  persistent elevated pollution episodes,
                  and the other continued the 1979 north-
                  east regional oxidant study in develop-
                  ing part of the data base for the re-
                  gional oxidant model. Field activities
                  were based in Columbus, OH.
                   Ten research aircraft and several mo-
                  bile and stationary surface monitoring
                  platforms from three EPA contractors,
                  seven Federal agencies, and four Uni-
                  versities participated in the intensive
                  measurement program between 16
                  July  and 15 August 1980. Pollutants
                  measured included SO2, NO, NO?, 03,
                  sulfate, nitrate, and aerosols. This re-
                  port  describes the contractors' activi-
                  ties. Their aircraft logged over 350 flight
                  hours in 100 missions ranging as far
                  east  as Laconia,  NH, as far south as
                  Montgomery, AL, as  far west as
                  Texarkana, AR, and as far north as Sag-
                  inaw. Ml.
                   Descriptive analyses are summarized
                  for urban plume missions and regional
missions. The quality assurance pro-
gram is described, showing the efforts
made to develop a well coordinated
data base. Sources for reports and data
are provided. Many subsets of the data
base can be used in model develop-
ment of transport, transformation, and
removal processes.
  This Project Summary was devel-
oped by EPA's Atmospheric Sciences
Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
Park, NC, to announce key findings of
the research project that is fully docu-
mented in a separate report of the same
title (see Project Report ordering infor-
mation at back).

Introduction
  Increasing concern for the regional
nature of formation and transport of
secondary pollutants (e.g., sulfates, ni-
trates, oxidants, and aerosols) has led
the EPA to conduct major field studies
since the mid 1970's. The project report,
here summarized, describes activities
during the summer of 1980 that ad-
dressed the occurrence of Persistent El-
evated Pollution Episodes (PEPES) and
continued the Northeast Regional Oxi-
dant Study (NEROS). These activities
are known as The 1980  PEPE-NEROS
study.
  The PEPE-NEROS study involved two
field programs coordinated from head-
quarters in Columbus, OH. PEPE opera-

-------
tions involved regional-scale missions
to characterize air masses transporting
aged pollutant mixtures. NEROS opera-
tions involved regional characterization
missions to provide parameterizations
for the Regional Oxidant Model (ROM)
as well as urban plume missions to de-
scribe  inputs to the ROM. Common
weather forecasting, communications,
and data  processing supported both
studies. Platforms were deployed for
PEPE or  NEROS missions, dependent
on forecast conditons.
  The prime contractor for this study
was Environmental Measurements, Inc.
with strong sub-contract support from
AeroVironment, Inc., SRI International,
and Washington University Technology
Associates. The project  report  focuses
on the activities of this contractor team.

Field Study

Participants and Platforms
  The organizations that participated in
the PEPE-NEROS  study are shown in
Table 1. Table 2 shows the nature of
their participation and the principal in-
vestigators involved.

Operations
  Depending on weather conditions,
platform  status, and study objectives,
specific PEPE or NEROS missions were
planned and executed. These missions
involved various mixes of activities and
geographic coverage.
  The NEROS missions for urban and
regional  studies  involved release of
clusters of small tetroons at various alti-
tudes (97 tetroons were released and
tracked by NCAA-Idaho Falls), and re-
lease of a large EPA tetroon to be
tracked by FAA centers. The position of
the large tetroon  could be phoned to
field headquarters in Columbus from
the FAA centers. Once the transport was
marked be tetroons, the aircraft and sur-
face platforms were deployed to docu-
ment the air  quality and mixing condi-
tions in the air mass. CHOPPER and the
NOAA  turbulence aircraft were princi-
pally dedicated to urban plume surveys.
The EPA Lidar plane mostly carried out
plume-oriented studies, but occasion-
ally conducted regional studies outside
Ohio. Moving Lab conducted frequent
ground-level surveys near Columbus,
but was also deployed to West Virginia
and  Kentucky for PEPE-oriented re-
gional surveys.
  NEROS regional measurements were
made  between about 70  and 85° W
longitude, and 38 and 45° N latitude to
characterize the northeastern grid used
in the ROM.  SCOUT, CHEM-1,  and
CHEM-2 made frequent flights  across
various parts of this NEROS area. They
were usually vectored to the location of
the large EPA tetroon in order to mea-
sure the  aging of the air mass in  the
vicinity of this  specific marker.
  ELECTRA was deployed for  its re-
gional surveys from Wallops Island, VA
in support of NEROS and PEPE regional
measurements. CHEM-3 provided cor-
relative in  situ measurements at se-
lected  locations beneath ELECTRA's
flight path as it had done earlier in the
program for LAS-Queenair flights.
  PEPE regional surveys  were less  re-
stricted, involving flights  into stagnant
air masses  (two to five days old) or into
moving air masses characterized by re-
gional visibility degradation,  as re-
ported by  FAA and National Weather
Service wire services and as detected by
satellite imagery. These  regional sur-
veys extended into New York and  New
England during the first week of August
1980, following  development  of
wide-spread haziness in the area. In the
middle of the  second week of August,
several flights into Tennessee,  Ala-
bama, and Arkansas were carried out to
characterize  a maritime tropical air
mass associated with an extension of
the Bermuda high that had been station-
nary over Georgia  and Tennessee for
four days. Measurements were  also
made as this aged  air mass moved out
to the Atlantic.
  Both internal and external quality as-
surance  activities were carried  out
throughout the field measurement pro-
gram. The  contractor team referenced
its platform measurements to a  master
calibrator separate from  each contrac-
tor's  internal  quality assurance pro-
gram. The team addressed the altitude
and time response of various  instru-
ments and developed a uniform  ap-
proach to data processing. Aircraft fly-
bys were conducted to provide in  situ
platform  comparisons. In addition, EPA
provided an external audit of most of
the project platforms through the  ser-
vices of Research Triangle Institute and
PEDCO.

Data Base
  The Project  Report gives a  summary
description of the  data base that was
created at the Special Studies  Data Cen-
ter at Washington University. This data
base is also available at EPA's  Meteorol-
ogy and Assessment Division. These
Table 1.    Participants in the PEPE
           NEROS Study
              Agencies

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

   ESRL - Research  Triangle Park
   EMSL - Research Triangle Park
   EMSL - Las Vegas

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin-
  istration (NOAA)

   Boulder Laboratories (BL)
   Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
   (INEL)

National Science Foundation

   National Center for Atmospheric Re-
   search (NCAR)

National Aeronautics and Space Adminis-
  tration (NASA)

   Langley Research Center (LRC)
   Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
   Wallops Island

Department of Energy

   Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency


             Contractors

Environmental Measurements, Inc. (EMI)
AeroVironment, Inc. (AV)
SRI International
Washington  University Technology Associ-
  ates (WUTA)
MESOMET, Inc.

Battelle Columbus Laboratories (BCD
Research Triangle Institute
PEDCO Environmental


             Universities

Washington University
Harvey Mudd College
Ohio State University
Others, supported by the Agencies

             International

Atmospheric Environment Service of
  Canada
Millan M. Millan of Barringer Research
N.D.  van Egmond, Rijks Instituut voor de
  Voksgezondheid
Bertin & Cie

-------
Table 2.    Platforms and Operations During PEPE-NEROS

     Airborne Platforms                  Source
                       Principal Investigator
CHEM-1 (Chemistry Aircraft)
CHEM-2 (Chemistry Aircraft)
SCOUT (Chemistry Aircraft)
ELECTRA (Lidar Aircraft)
CHEM-3 (Chemistry Aircraft)
LASC Queenair
EPA Lidar
Turbulence Aircraft
Cloud Chemistry Aircraft
CHOPPER (Chemistry Aircraft)

Surface Platforms

Moving Laboratory
Doppler Sodar ^ and 2
Aerosol Laboratory
Lidar Van
Tethered Balloon
Benin Sodar
MARSd

Other Operations
EMI
AV
SRI
NASA/LRC-
Wallops Island

NASA/LRC
NASA/JPL
EMSL Las Vegas
NOAA/BL
NCAR
EPA-TVA-EMI
EMI
AV
U. of Minnesota
SRI
NASA/LRC
Benin & Cie
NASA/JPL
Willian Vaughan
Ivar Tombach
Bruce Cantrell
Ed Browell (UV-DIAL)a
Jeffrey Scroga (HSRL)b

Gerald Gregory
Mike Schumate
Jim McElroy
Brad Bean
Al Lazrus
Willian Vaughan
Gary Klauber
Michael Chan
Peter McMurry
Ed Uthe
Otto Youngbluth
Pierre Huguet
Bruce Gary
Small Tetroon Tracking
Large Tetroon Tracking
GC Laboratory
Photochemistry Precursors
/VOX Ozone Network
Dry Deposition Experiment
Sun Photometer Network

Data Center
Weather Center
NOAA/INEL
SRI
ESRL
Harvey Mudd
EMI-BCL
ANL
NASA/LRC-
U. of Miami
WUTA
SRI
Gene Start
Walt Dabberdt
William Lonneman
Gregory Kok
William Vaughan
Marvin Wesley
Joe Prospero

Noor Gillani
William Viezee
aUV-DIAL Ultraviolet Differential Absorption Lidar
bHSRL    High Spectral Resolution Lidar
CLAS     Laser Absorption Spectrometer
dMARS   Microwave Atmospheric Remote Sensor
magnetic tape data are in standard for-
mat and are available by individual plat-
form or by day with all measurements
linked by time.
  The magnetic tape data  base has a
companion hard copy data base with
data volumes for  contractor platforms
and for special study measurements.
An overview volume  summarizes
meteorological conditions and mea-
surement activities for each day.

Observations
  As noted above, both urban plume
and regional missions were carried out.
These collections of data were reviewed
and assigned a priority based on appar-
ent quantity and  quality of data. De-
scriptive analyses  were then prepared.
  AeroVironment  prepared a  descrip-
tive analysis report for the urban plume
surveys on 30-31 July and on 4,12, and
113 August 1980. Because of budget con-
straints, these analyses were focussed
      on the flights of CHEM-2. SRI  Interna-
      tional prepared regional descriptive
      analyses for the regional missions on 1
      August and on 7-11 August 1980.

      Urban Plume Descriptive Anal-
      ysis
        The data from CHEM-2 were closely
      reviewed for chemistry information,
      and the  data from  Lidar Van,  Sodar-1
      and -2, NWS  soundings from  Dayton,
      and from tetroon releases were used to
      evaluate the meteorological data.  Air
      parcel trajectories were constructed for
      the five urban plume days noted above.
      The air quality parameters measured by
      CHEM-2 were summarized for the times
      when CHEM-2 was considered to be in
      the urban plume from Columbus.
        The vertical extent of the plume was
      determined from aircraft soundings and
      was used to select the altitude  range of
      winds for trajectory calculations. The
      width of the urban plume was graphi-
cally  presented to show plume maxi-
mum and  average concentrations as
well as background values to either side
of the plume and upwind of Columbus.
Seven air quality parameters were tabu-
lated  for each traverse of  the plume.
Values for  the plume were  sometimes
difficult to  determine because of small
gradients, and often required subjective
judgements. Ozone served as the  best
indic&tor of the urban plume.
  On  several occasions, trajectory eval-
uation indicated  that  measurements
may have been made to the side of the
urban plume. Measurements within the
urban plume indicated that higher
ozone levels tend  to occur in the lower
portion  of the plume, and that the
plume width, defined by elevated ozone
values, does not vary greatly, averaging
20 to  30 km. Some transects at greater
distances showed apparently narrower
ozone plumes, probably  because only
the core  of the plume was distinguish-
able  from  background values. Data
from  other platforms may improve the
overall plume resolution.
  The Columbus plume was much
easier to detect and track with a flow of
clean  continental air from the northwest
than  with a southwesterly  flow when
the plumes from Cincinnati and Dayton,
OH made up the background air mass.

Regional Descriptive Analysis
  Separate meteorological descriptions
were  prepared for the time periods ex-
amined by  SRI International. An exten-
sive array of meteorological data  was
evaluated  for each period, including
probabilistic treatment of trajectories
that were transporting the air.
  The general measurement activities
of the surface and airborne platforms
were  summarized in  graphic form.
Tables were prepared summarizing the
average, maximum, and  minimum
values of up to six air quality parame-
ters (O3, NOX, S02, bscat, sulfate, and ni-
trate)  along various segments of the tra-
verses.
  The 1  August 1980  measurements,
primarily by CHEM-2, involved follow-
ing an air mass of low visibility that was
exiting the  east coast. It did not linger
over the Ohio Valley long enough to be-
come  a major PEPE over that region.
Sampling  proceeded  eastward from
cleaner  air over Ohio  into  the  dirtier
trailing edge of the air  mass.  Because
the flight was approximately parallel to
the transport wind, measurements in
the eastern portion of  the flight were

-------
  made in older air parcels that had been
  over Ohio 6-12 hours earlier. Definite
  trends of increasing ozone, sulfate, ni-
  trate, and light scattering show the pen-
  etration  of aged air parcels. Ozone, in
  units of ppb, increased from about 90 in
  eastern  Ohio to about  115 in eastern
  Pennsylvania and  New Jersey, light
  scattering,  in  units of  10~4 nrr1,  in-
  creased from 1 to 5; 2;'s aerosol sulfate,
  in units of n,g m~3, increased from 23 to
  a peak of 50, then dropped to about 32;
  and nitrate,  in units of ppb,  increased
  from 3 to 8. Vertical profiles showed lit-
  tle stratification within the mixed layer.
  The   return  flight  documented  the
  cleaner air to the west, but also showed
  dirtier air toward the surface as  the air
  stabilized after sunset. Aerosol sulfate,
  in units of (xg rrT3 dropped from about
  35 in New Jersey to about 15 in central
  Pennsylvania, but increased to about 31
  below 900 m elevation in eastern Ohio.
    Meteorological conditions of 7-11 Au-
  gust led to a broad region over the
  southeast of relatively stagnant air that
  was strongly influenced by the diurnal
  heating cycle, with daytime convection
  distributing the low visibility air near the
  surface into a deep layer. This mixing
  prevented the buildup of aerosols in a
  layer  near the surface that would have
  led to even lower visibilities. In addition,
  thunderstorms and associated washout
  led to a patchy pattern, in both the hori-
  zontal and vertical, of low visibility and
  increased pollutant levels.
    The northern part of the stagnation
  region was  initially monitored  on  7-8
  August following a  Regional Air Mass
  Characterization scenario, with a  shift to
  regional PEPE missions as the stagnant
  air mass developed. The PEPE missions
  were  conducted  through  11 August,
      when an approaching cold front termi-
      nated the episode. During the episode,
      three regions of low visibility and high
      ozone were characterized by measure-
      ments. NEROS platforms obtained mea-
      surements in one of  these areas, over
      the Washington, D.C. to New York,  NY
      corridor. Contractor platforms charac-
      terized areas over the southeast portion
      of the Ohio River valley, and then over
      northern Alabama. Ozone values in  the
      main PEPE area to the west of the Ap-
      palachians were generally above 90 ppb
      and reached  150 ppb in some areas.
      Light  scattering   coefficients  up   to
      5 x 10~4 m"1  were measured.

      Recommendations
        The extensive,  relatively homoge-
      neous,  and accessible  data base that
      now  exists as a result of the PEPE-
      NEROS field program is primed for fur-
      ther use. It is a valuable data  base  be-
cause great care was taken to integrate
it into a coherent whole, from design
concept through field  implementation.
This data base is a singular collection of
atmospheric measurements that ad-
dress:
  •  Transformation  processes  associ-
    ated with acid rain issues
  •  Transport processes associated
    with regional oxidant and visibility
    issues
  •  Mixing and removal mechanisms
  •  Aerosol growth  by heterogeneous
    and homogeneous mechanisms
  •  The  interaction of forecasts and
    realtime trajectories with  field sam-
    pling strategies
  •  Other topics to be defined as atmo-
    spheric process investigators and
    modelers become aware  of this re-
    source.
         William M. Vaughan is with Environmental Measurements, Inc., University City,
           MO 63124.
         Francis Pooler, Jr., is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
         The complete report,  entitled "Transport of Pollutants in Plumes and PEPES: A
           Study of Transport of Pollutants in Power Plant Plumes, Urban and Industrial
           Plumes,  and Persistent Elevated Pollution Episodes," (Order No. PB 85-191
           666/AS; Cost: $10.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
                National Technical Information Service
                5285 Port Royal Road
                Springfield, VA 22161
                Telephone: 703-487-4650
         The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory
                U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Research  Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/S3-85/033
           0000329    PS

           U  S  ENVIR PROTECTION  flGENCY
           REGION  5  LIERARY
           230  S  DEARBCRN  STREET
           CHICAGO                IL    60
-------