&ER&
                               United States
                               Environmental Protection
                               Agency
                                Environmental Sciences Research
                                Laboratory
                                Research Triangle Park NC 2771:
                                Research and Development
                                EPA-600/S4-81-021  July 1981
Project Summary
                                Development  of  Methods and
                               Analysis of  Particulate
                                Sampler Data  from  RAPS

                                Sandor J. Freedman and William M. Yeager
                                 Methods were formulated, tested
                               and demonstrated to statistically
                               analyze and graphically process ana-
                               lytical data derived from dichotomous
                               particulate samplers operating at ten
                               Regional Air Monitoring System
                               (RAMS) stations in the greater St.
                               Louis area.
                                 Statistical techniques and computer
                               programs are documented in this
                               report and  the sample outputs are
                               presented for the following tasks:
                                 • Time series plots of total mass
                                   and sulfate 24-hr averages for
                                   high volume and dichotomous
                                   sampler instruments
                                 • Means and standard deviations of
                                   total mass and sulfate by station
                                   by quarter for high volume and
                                   dichotomous samplers
                                 • Correlations between high volume
                                   and dichotomous sampler mea-
                                   surements of total mass and sul-
                                   fate at each station
                                 • Scatterplots of high volume vs.
                                   dichotomous sampler measure-
                                   ments for total mass and sulfate
                                   at each  station
                                 • Frequency distributions for the
                                   fine/total ratio of total mass, sul-
                                   fate, and lead at each station for
                                   dichotomous sampler measure-
                                   ments
                                 • Correlations between the fine
                                   and coarse fractions for 23 ele-
                                   ments plus total mass at each
                                   station for dichotomous sampler
                                   measurements
                                 • Correlations among six selected
                                   elements and total mass at each
                                   station by fraction for dichoto-
                                   mous sampler measurements
                                 This report was submitted by System
                               Sciences, Inc. in fulfillment of Con-
                               tract No. 68-02-2495 with the U.S.
                               Environmental  Protection  Agency.
                               The technical effort reported commenced
                               on January 13, 1977, and was com-
                               pleted on September 12, 1980.
                                 This Project Summary was developed
                               by EPA 's Environmental Sciences Re-
                               search Laboratory. Research Triangle
                               Park, NC. to announce key findings of
                               the research project that is fully docu-
                               mented in a separate report  of the
                               same title (see Project Report ordering
                               information at back).

                               Introduction
                                 A recently developed technique, using
                               the dichotomous sampler coupled with
                               X-ray fluorescence analysis of samples,
                               has facilitated the determination of the
                               mass and elemental in concentrations
                               for particulate matter collected from
                               ambient air in two different size ranges.
                               The data consist of  measurements
                               taken in the years 1975, 1976,  and
                               1977 at ten sites in the greater St. Louis
                               area. Continuous sampling was con-
                               ducted,  and periods between filter
                               changes ranged from 2 to 12 hours. The
                               sites coincided with 10 of the 25 sites of
                               the Regional Air Monitoring System
                               (RAMS), a part of the Regional Air
                               Pollution Study (RAPS). Site locations

-------
ranged from  urban to rural areas at
varying distances from  a variety of
industrial point sources as well  as
sources of emissions from mobile vehi-
cles.  Data generated by the  RAMS
monitoring program include paniculate
mass  and sulfate from a  standard  hi-
volume sampler as well as a variety of
measurements of other atmospheric
conditions.
  The data provide a unique opportunity
for investigating relationships between
air quality and emissions as well as the
spatial and temporal characteristics of
ambient pollutant concentrations. The
work  reported herein consists of the
development and implementation of
computer-assisted methodology for pre-
sentation and analysis of dichotomous
particulate sampler data. The analyses
include the following:
  • Time series plots, scatter plots, and
    correlations of 24-hour averages of
    total  mass and sulfate for high
    volume and dichotomous sampler
    data at each station
  • Means and standard deviations of
    total mass and sulfate by station by
    quarter for high volume and dichoto-
    mous samplers
  • Frequency  distributions for  the
    fine/total ratio of total mass, sulfate,
    and lead  at each station for dichot-
    omous sampler measurements
  • Correlations between the fine and
    coarse fractions for 23  elements
    and total mass at each  station for
    dichotomous sampler  measure-
    ments

Monitoring
  The RAMS  network consisted of  25
stations strategically located through-
out the greater St. Louis area. Dichot-
omous samplers and hi-volume samplers
were operated at ten of the sites (See
Table  1). These sites  lay along four
concentric  circles centered  in down-
town St. Louis with radii of 4,10,20 and
40 kilometers, respectively.  The sites
represented a diverse range of sampling
environments from heavily trafficked,
inner city areas to industrial locations to
agricultural settings.  Choice of site
locations was based primarily upon the
extent of surrounding pollutant emis-
sion sources (stationary or mobile) and
the significance of topographical fea-
tures  capable of influencing local air
flow.
  The automated dichotomous sampler
operates  on  the  principle of virtual
impaction. That is, particles are impacted
into a  slowly pumped void thus elimi-
nating the problem of particle bounce on
collection surfaces. The device collected
particles in two size ranges: fine«2.4/um)
and coarse  (2.4 to 20 yum). Filters from
the dichotomous sampler were sent to
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL),
Berkeley, CA for mass and elemental
analysis.
  X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy was
employed at LBL to determine the ele-
mental composition of samples in both
fine and coarse fractions. The composi-
tion of a sample was determined by irra-
diation with a beam of X-ray and obser-
vation of the emissions of characteristic
K and L X-rays. The procedure was well
suited for analysis of elements heavier
than Mg in atomic weight. The following
elements were analyzed: Al, Si, P, S, Cl,
K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr,  Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga,
As, Se, Br, Rb, Sr, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, and Pb.
A  beta gauge was used to determine
total mass for both fine and coarse frac-
tion  samples. The beta gauge method
for aerosol mass determination had an
accuracy of 12 jig/m3 for 2-hr samples
and  2 ug/m3 for 12-hr samples. The
reproducibility of the X-ray fluorescence
measurements was found to be within
5% for major elements.
  Hi-volume particulate samplers were
also operated at each of the 10 dichoto-
mous sampler sites in the RAMS  net-
work. Samples were  collected for 24-
hour periods every third day. Hi-volume
samples were analyzed by Rockwell In-
ternational for total particulate mass, sul-
fate and nitrate concentrations. Dichot-
omous samplers and hi-volume samplers
were operated simultaneously side-by-
side; pollutant data collected simul-
taneously were matched for compari-
son of the two types of instruments.

Results
  Tables  1  and 2 show comparisons of
the high volume and dichotomous sam-
pler results. For both total mass and sul-
fate, the high volume instrument collects
significantly greater amounts than does
the dichotomous sampler.  Overall, the
ratio of high volume and dichotomous
sampler results is 1.87 ± .03 for total
mass, 1.47 ± .02 for sulfate. There are
no significant differences between sta-
tions in the ratios for either mass or
sulfate. The central sites have the largest
concentration of both mass and sulfate.
In general, the mass concentrations
were highest during the second quarter
(April-June); the sulfate concentrations
were highest during the third  (July-
September). For total mass the overall
correlation  coefficient is 0.671, varying
from 0.377 at station  120 to 0.860 at
Table 1.    Linear Regression Analysis Hi-Volume Mass vs. Dichotomous Total Mass
Station
Number
103
105
106
108
112
115
118
120
122
124
All
No. of
Cases
120
118
95
91
115
111
104
97
112
77
1040
Mean
HV/DS
Ratio
1.93
2.04
1.76
1.96
1.73
1.57
2.18
1.71
1.72
2.17
1.869
S.D.
HV/DS
Ratio
0.85
0.78
0.82
1.09
O.71
0.52
1.33
1.09
0.92
1.32
0.970
Corr.
Coeff.
0.637
0.646
0.666
0.708
0.722
0.860
0.514
0.377
0.594
0.433
0.671
Intercept*
(ug/m3)
43.99
49.46
29.40
31.50
21.11
14.33
37.02
31.06
22.27
28.33
27.04
95% Conf.
Interval
-16.28~104.26
+ 0.24- 98. 68
-20.88- 79.68
-24.23- 87.23
-37.26- 79.48
-12.56- 41.22
-15.01- 89.05
-28.80- 90.92
-26.49- 71.03
-23.56- 80.22
-25.81- 79.89
Slope*
0.902
0.786
0.967
1.051
1.143
1.074
0.809
0.682
0.861
0.919
1.020
95% Conf.
Interval
0.703-1.101
0.615-0.957
0.744-1.190
0.830-1.272
0.938-1.348
0.953-1.195
0.544-1.074
0.340-1.024
0.640-1.082
0.478-1.360
0.951-1.089
 'The intercept of the regression line is the predicted value of the HIVOL mass when the dichotomous sampler mass is zero.
 "The slope of the regression line is the predicted change in HIVOL mass for unit change in dichotomous sampler mass.

-------
Table 2.    Linear Regression Analysis Hi-Volume Sulfate vs. Dichotomous Sulfate
Station
Number
103
105
106
108
112
115
118
120
122
124
All
No. of
Cases
132
141
103
105
143
129
110
106
121
78
1168
Mean
HV/DS
Ratio
1.47
1.39
1.35
1.47
1.39
1.35
1.53
1.80
1.53
1.45
1.47
S.D.
HV/DS
Ratio
0.65
0.34
0.45
0.66
0.83
0.46
0.75
1.35
0.66
0.55
0.72
Corr.
Coeff.
0.857
0.964
0.937
0.811
0.818
0.904
0.854
0.637
0.702
0.952
0.838
Intercept
(M/m*)
4.574
2.815
2.983
4.647
2.927
3.418
4.725
3.705
3.711
2.695
3.620
95% Conf.
Interval
-1 .893*1 1 .041
-0.796* 6.426
-3.435* 9.401
-3.990*13.284
-6.576*12.430
-1.979* 8.815
-1.870*11.320
-9.418*16.828
-8.715*16.137
-2.932* 8.322
-4.481*11.721
Slope*1
0.791
0.939
0.916
0.778
0.928
0.808
0.706
0.949
0.888
0.951
0.864
95% Conf.
Interval
0.708*0.874
0.896*0.982
0.848*0.984
0.668*0.888
0.819*1.037
0.741*0.875
0.624*0.788
0.725*1.173
0.724*1.052
0.881*1.021
0.832*0.896
 'The intercept of the regression line is the predicted value of the HIVOL mass when the dichotomous sampler mass is zero.
 "The slope of the regression line is the predicted change in HIVOL mass for unit change in dichotomous sampler mass.
station 115. The correlation coefficients
for sulfate  are higher, with an overall
value of 0.838, varying from 0.637 at
station 120 to 0.964 at station 105.
  Differences between the measure-
ments by high volume and dichotomous
samplers  may be at least partially
explained by differences in the design of
the two instruments. The high volume
sampler had essentially no upper cutoff
for particle size, but the dichotomous
sampler rejected particles with diam-
eters greater than  20 um. Although
particle size distributions were not
measured  by the RAMS instruments,
previous studies have shown that aero-
sol particles have a bimodal size distri-
bution, with different sources'for each
mode. The fine particle mode (< 2 ton in
diameter) is primarily due to combustion
products. The coarse particle mode (> 3
//m in diameter) results from dispersion
of mechanically generated particles,
especially soil. The greater total mass
measured by the high volume samplers
may be due to particles larger than 20
ion diameter in St. Louis aerosol. Known
sources of dust in the area include road
dust, rock quarries,  cement manufac-
turing, and wind erosion of soil. Applica-
tion of a chemical  element balance
model to the dichotomous sampler data
from St. Louis indicated that crustal
components account for 43% of the total
mass.
  Another difference between the high
volume and the dichotomous samplers
is  in the filter media. The former used
glass fiber filters while the latter used
cellulose ester membrane filters. Glass
fiber filters  are known to collect artifact
SO4 in the presence of SOZ gas. This
may account for the larger amounts of
sulfate  collected in the high volume
samplers. The higher correlations be-
tween the high volume and dichotomous
measurements of sulfate probably result
from the fact that most of the sulfate
(89%) is in the fine fraction, which is not
affected by differences in inlet design.
  Other differences between the two
instruments include the lack of symmetry
in the gable roof of the volume sampler,
which makes its collection efficiency
sensitive to wind direction. The dichoto-
mous sampler used inlets having axial
symmetry. The high volume samplers
were operated from midnight to mid-
night on a three or six day cycle; filters
remained in the instrument for several
hours after the air flow was shut off,
which could have allowed some addi-
tional particles to have settled onto
them.
  The  analysis of the dichotomous
sampler data by size fraction showed
that the total mass was approximately
equally divided between the fine and the
coarse fractions. There was no signifi-
cant site dependence in the ratios of fine
to total mass and elemental concentra-
tions. Overall, the ratio was 0.518 ±
.001 for mass, 0.885 ± .001  for sulfur
and 0.799 ± .001 for lead. The correla-
tion between fine and coarse fractions
was highest for bromine and titanium,
lower  for lead and sulfur, and even
lower for total mass. The correlations
among elements were highest for sulfur
with total mass in the coarse fraction,
for  iron with total mass in the fine
fraction, and for lead with bromine in
both fractions. The high correlation
between lead and bromine is expected,
since both are due to auto emissions.
   Sandor J. Freedman and William M.  Yeager are with System Sciences, Inc.,
     Chapel Hill, NC 27514.
   Thomas G. Dzubay is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "Development of Methods and Analysis of Panicu-
     late Sampler Data from RAPS," (Order No. PB 81-179 327; Cost: $17.00,
     subject to change) will be available only from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
          Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory
          U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                                                     > US GOVERNMENT PfUNTINO OFFICE. 1(61 -757-OU/7Z07

-------
United States                     Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection             Information
Agency                         Cincinnati OH 45268                                        Protect
                                                                                     Agency
	EPA 335

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
       PS   0000329
       U S ENVIR PROTECTION  AGENCY
       REGION 5  LIBRARY
       230 S  DEARBORN  STREET
       CHICAGO  IL 60604

-------