v°/EPA
                                 United States
                                 Environmental Protection
                                 Agency
                                 Environmental Monitoring Systems?
                                 Laboratory
                                 Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                                 Research and Development
                                 EPA-600/S4-82-059  Dec. 1982
Project  Summary
                                 Sampling  Air for  Gaseous
                                 Organic  Chemicals  Using
                                 Solid Adsorbents.
                                 Application  to  Tenax

                                J. F. Walling, R. E. Berkley, D. H. Swanson, and F. J. Toth
                                  A simple input-output model for a
                                two-phase flow system with fixed bed
                                was applied to Tenax adsorption of
                                atmospheric contaminants. The model
                                fit laboratory data acceptably and
                                relationships with previous approaches
                                were stated. Chromatographic reten-
                                tion volumes are used in this model
                                which provides a means of scaling
                                adsorbent bed dimensions and flow
                                rates  to preserve desired output
                                characteristics.
                                  Suggestions are made about how to
                                use the model for rational sampling
                                design when quantitative information
                                is needed. Practical limitations of field
                                operations and fundamental know-
                                ledge and the heed to evaluate every
                                datum lead to practical suggestions
                                for sampling. At least two samples
                                collected simultaneously but at very
                                different flow rates are suggested as
                                necessary for quantitative work.
                                  This Project Summary was devel-
                                oped by EPA's Environmental Monitor-
                                ing Systems Laboratory Research Tri-
                                angle Park, NC, to announce key find-
                                ings of the research project that is fully
                                documented in a separate report of the
                                same title (see Project Report ordering
                                information at back).

                                Introduction
                                 Solid adsorbents are very convenient
                                to use in field sampling and therefore
                                have been employed  extensively to
                                concentrate trace organic pollutants in
                                 sampling ambient air. It was usual to
                                 assume that standard Chromatographic
                                 theory could be applied. Since the main
                                 objectives of chromatography are not
                                 the same as those of field sampling with
                                 solid adsorbents, that theory was not
                                 developed with the goal of solving the
                                 practical problems of establishing field
                                 sampling procedures. Variables that are
                                 critical  in the field situation are not
                                 explicitly handled in a convenient way
                                 and a huge fundamental data base is
                                 needed  for application.
                                  The objectives of this work were:

                                  1. To obtain  a simple alternative
                                 model which incorporates a minimum
                                 number of adjustable parameters and
                                 establishes a relationship among im-
                                 portant  sampling variables:
                                    (a) weight of adsorbent
                                    (b) adsorbent bed (sampling tube)
                                      geometry
                                    (c) flow rate
                                    (d)  input concentration to the
                                      adsorbent bed
                                    (e) adsorbent bed output concen-
                                      tration
                                    (f) elapsed sampling time
                                  2. To test the accuracy of the function
                                 obtained in describing a few simplified
                                 controlled laboratory experiments; and
                                  3. To  design  a  simple practical
                                 scheme for sampling and data interpre-
                                 tation which also can provide evidence of
                                 consistency in the results.

-------
Procedure
  The model investigated can be written
as:
   1n
   K L
C  _o

C0  VL
  C is the bed's exit concentration at
  elapsed time t, g/cm3
  C0  is the bed inlet  concentration,
  g/cm3
  Ko  is a pseudo first-order rate con-
  stant, min~1
  L is the adsorbent bed length, cm
  VL  is  a superficial  flow velocity,
  cm/min
  t is the elapsed time after beginning of
  sampling, min.
  ts is the elapsed time required to reach
  the adsorbing capacity of the bed. Un-
  der restricted conditions it is equal to
  ratio of the familiar chromatographic
  retention  volume to  the  volumetric
  flow rate.
  The model is an approximate relation
 applicable to any adsorbent. However,
 its  validity is  limited  to a range of
 elapsed times from perhaps O.K t_ <
 0.8.                           ts
  The utility of the model was.tested by
 simulated sampling using a permeation
 tube system to supply known concentra-
 tion of cleaned pollutant doped air at
 various  flow  rates.  Flame ionization
 detection of the output of  the Tenax
^cartridge  was utilized  to obtain a
 relationship between elapsed time and
 concentration  of  the pollutant  in the
 effluent from the cartridge. The effects
 of  changes in concentration tempera-
 ture, flow  rate,  and  bed  size were
 investigated. Chloroform, trichloroethy-
 lene, benzene, tetrachloroethylene,
 toluene, 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,3-
 dichloropropane were  used  in  the
 experiments.
  Computation of the retention volume
 and  Ko  from the constants  of  the
 empirical fits was  done  by  simple
 rearrangement of the basic equation to
 match the empirical form and identifying
 the appropriate collection of variables
 with the empirical constants.
were observed on the same chemical
systems  at  10°C. K0 was less  well
behaved and characterized but exhibited
a typical value of about 200 min"1.

Conclusions
  The model is  capable of giving a
reasonable and compact description of
the sampling behavior  of the Tenax
cartridges over  a range of  variables
likely to be met in the field:
  35 cmVmm  < flow  rate <  500
  cmVmin
  1.25 cm < bed radius < 0.6 cm
                when
         2<
                                               Bed Length
                                               Bed Radius
                 and
30 cm/min <  Flow Rate _ 400 cm/min
            n (Bed Radius)2
Recommendations
  A suggested simplified approach for
routine sampling is as follows:
  1.  Use a  fixed cartridge  size. (At
present GC/MS sample desorbers limit
severely the  options with respect to
cartridge size.)
  2.  Allow the single substance, whose
determination is required and which
has  the smallest published  retention
volume at 38°C (100°F),  control the
sampling calculations.  If necessary,
divide the  list into ranges of retention
volumes and sample independently for
each range.
  3.  The desired sample averaging time
is usually specified by the situation.
  4.  Compute a flow rate conservative-
ly using the model and  an acceptable
value of C/C0. Or, more simply, use the
published retention  volume divided by
the desired sampling time. If ambient
temperatures are expected to be cool,
use the value computed. If they are near
29°C (85°F) or higher, use one-half the
computed value.
  5.  Present evidence in every situation
of the  data credibility. Complete every
sampling in at least duplicate (parallel)
at different flow rates, e.g., the flow rate
computed  in  4 above and another at
perhaps half of that value. "Agreement"
of  the  analyses on  duplicate samples
would  be  an indication of  adequate
retention.
   The EPA authors J. F. Walling, R, E. Berkley. D. H. Swanson. and F. J. Toth
    are with the Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Research Triangle
    Park, NC 27711.
   The complete report, entitled "Sampling Air for Gaseous Organic Chemicals
    Using Solid Adsorbents. Application to Tenax," (Order No. PB 82-262 189;
    Cost: $8.50, subject to change} will be available only from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield. VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA authors can be contacted at:
          Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park,  NC27711
 Results
  Agreement of  computed  retention
 volumes with published values was
 generally  within ±25 percent.  No
 concentration dependences or changes
 due tothepresence of another substance
 were observed at 38°C. Both effects

-------
                                                                         •& U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:  1982—• 659-O17/O875
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

-------