United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
 Research and Development
EPA/600/S4-85/029  May 1985
Project Summary
Development of  Methods for
Pesticides  in  Wastewaters

J. S. Warner, T. M. Engel, and P. J. Mondron
  The project covered by the full report
involved the development of monitoring
procedures for the analysis of 33 pesti-
cides in relevant industrial waste waters.
The procedures were modeled after
existing 304(h) procedures, specific yet
as simplified as possible. Common
techniques such as packed column gas
chromatography (GC) and high perform-
ance  liquid chromatography (HPLC)
with specific detection systems were
used  in conjunction  with standard
work-up procedures based on separa-
tory funnel-methylene chloride extrac-
tion. Kuderna-Danish (K-D) concentra-
tion, and silica gel or Florisil cleanup
whenever possible. Method detection
limit (MDL) and the applicable analytical
range were determined from spiked
reagent water samples. Precision and
accuracy of the  methods were deter-
mined in relevant industrial wastewaters
where possible.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's  Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati,
OH, to announce key findings of the
research project that is fully docu-
mented in a separate report of the same
title (see Project Report ordering infor-
mation at back).


Introduction
  The  methods described in the full report
were developed to meet USEPA's respon-
sibility to promulgate multi-residue test
procedures for the analysis of pesticides
in industrial wastewaters. This protocol
was modeled after the form and philos-
ophy of existing  and proposed 304(h)
methods. Common techniques and equip-
ment were employed and although speci-
ficity was required, the procedures were
kept as simple as possible with a minimum
number of steps. The preferred determin-
ative step was gas chromatography; high
pressure liquid chromatography was the
second choice.
  The compounds investigated were cat-
egorized according to:

• Similarities in structure
• Similarities in determinative step
• Co-occurrence in relevant industrial
  wastewater

  The protocol had the following goals:

• 1 f/g/L gas chromatographic detection
  limit or 10#g/L HPLC detection limit,
  and
• 85 percent recovery of analytes  from
  reagent water.

Chromatography
  The first step in development of  each
test procedure was the  experimental
determination of a detection system that
met the sensitivity requirement for  each
one of the compounds to be analyzed in a
given group. Chromatographic columns
and operating parameters were selected
that would separate the compounds
expected to co-occur in a given industrial
waste sample. The separation had to be
sufficient for quantitation while keeping
the  analysis time under 1  hr. In some
cases,  more than one system  was re-
quired for  a  given wastewater.  This
occurred when a single industrial facility
manufactured either structurally  very
similar  or very  dissimilar  compounds.
Problems requiring the development of a
second chromatographic system were
coelution, retention times of more than 1
hr, and inadequate sensitivity for one or
more compounds produced at  a single
site.

-------
Model Verification or
Modification
  After chromatographic conditions were
selected, the applicability of the model
procedure suggested by existing 304(h)
methods was tested for each compound.
The model utilized 1 -liter sample volumes
extracted with three aliquots of methylene
chloride followed by K-D concentration
and standard column cleanup techniques,
if required.

Extraction and Concentration
  The percent recovery of each compound
from deionized water at neutral  pH was
determined, and adjustments in the pH of
the water or the volume of the extraction
solvent were used to maximize the per-
cent recovery value of this step.

Cleanup
  The appropriate solvent fortified with
each compound was applied to a standard
adsorbent column and the column eluted
with various solvent mixtures. The elution
pattern  and percent  recovery value for
this procedural step were determined for
each  compound. Variations  from the
cleanup step of the model procedure
included changes in the composition of
elution mixture, water deactivation of the
sorbent, and use of various  sorbents.
Often, further method modifications were
required to separate the compounds  of
interest from interferences found in the
relevant wastewater. The systems devel-
oped and described in each report must
be considered only as a starting  point in
effecting an adequate cleanup.


Application to Relevant
Industrial Wastewater
  After  extraction  and cleanup proce-
dures were developed using fortified
reagent water,  industrial wastewaters,
which reflected the matrices in which the
studied compounds were  likely to be
present, were analyzed. Further modifi-
cations were made as necessary. Selected
compound groups were then fortified at
detectable levels into relevant industrial
wastewater samples and percent recovery
values from this matrix were determined.
  Precision  and accuracy  were deter-
mined from the analysis of seven repli-
cates of fortified relevant industrial
wastewaters. Method  detection limits
were  determined in fortified  reagent
water samples. Analytical curves were
generated to determine and  demonstrate
the linearity of recovery of the compounds
from reagent water.
  Table 1 lists the  methods developed
and the compounds within each method.
The compounds within a  method desig-
nation are grouped according to similar
analytical characteristics.

Table 1.    Pesticides  Grouped by EPA
          Method Numbers

604.1   Phenolic Pesticides

       Dichlorophen
       Hexachlorophen

616    Neutral C. H & O Pesticides

       Cycloprate
       Kinoprene
       Methoprene
       Resmethrin

618    Volatile Pesticides

       Chloropicrin
       Ethylene dibromide

620    Diphenylamine

622.1   Thiophosphates

       Dichlorofenthion
       Famphur
       Fenitrothion
       Fonofos
       Phosmet
       Thionazin

633.1   Neutral Nitrogen Containing Pesticides

       Fenarimol
       MGK - 264
       MGK - 326
       Pronamide

634    Thiocarbamate Pesticides

       Butylate
       Cycloate
       EPTC
       Moilnate
       Pebulate
       Vernolate
       Giv Card

635    Rotenone

636    Bensulide

637    MBTS and TCMTB

638    Oryzalin

639    Bendiocarb

640    Mercaptobenzothiazole


  Table 2 lists some  chromatographic
systems  and  parameters  utilized in the
methods. Stability studies (holding times,
etc.) were not specified in this contract.

-------
Table 2. Chromatographic Systems and Parameters Developed for Methods
MDL Chromatographic
Method Compound (ug/L) Detector Column
604.1

616



618


620



622.1






633.1



634





635

636

637

638

639

64O

Dichlorophen
Hexachlorophen
Cyc/oprate
Kinoprene
Methoprene
Resmethrin
Chloropicrin
Ethylene Dibromide

Diphenylamine



Aspon
Dichlorofenthion
Famphur
Fenitrothion
Fonofos
Phosmet
Thionazin
Fenarimol
MGK-264
MGK-326
Pronamide
Butylate
Cycloate
EPTC
Molinate
Pebulate
Vernolate
Rotenone

Bensulide

MBTS
TCMTB
Oryzalin

Bendiocarb

Mercaptobenzothiazole

1.0
1.2
21
18
22
36
0.8
0.2

1.6



0.6
0.7
19
2
0.7
1
1
4
2
6
4
0.6
1.6
0.9
0.6
0.8
1.1
1.6

1.6

0.5
1.0
0.5

1.8

1.7

UV/254

FID
FID
FID
FID
ECD
ECD

NPD



NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
NPD
UV/254

UV/270

UV/254

UV/254

UV/254

UV/254

5 u. Spherisorb-ODS,
250 x 4.5 mm
3%SP-2250on100/120
mesh Supelcoport


1%SP-1 000 on Carbopak B
f 60/80 mesh), 1.8 m x 2 mm
ID, glass column
3% SP-2250 on Supelcoport
1 100/120 mesh). ISOcmx
2 mm ID, glass column

3% SP-2250 on Supelcoport
(100/200 mesh) 1.8 mx 2 mm
ID, glass column




1 3% SP-2250 on Supelcoport
(100/200 mesh) 1.8 mx
2 mm ID, glass column

3% SP-2100 on Supelcoport
(100/1 20 mesh) 1.8 mx
2 mm ID, glass column



5uZorbax-CN
250x4.6 mm
Su, Spherisorb-ODS,
250 x4.6 mm
Su, Dupont Zorbax-CN.
250 x4.6 mm
Su, Spherisorb-ODS,
250 x 4.6 mm
5fj. Spherisorb-ODS,
250 x 4.6 mm
Su, Spherisorb-ODS,
250 x 4.6 mm
Operating
Parameters
65/35 acetonitrile/water .05%
HsPO4 at 1 mL/min
Programmed from 180° to
240° at 8°/min,
Injector - 280
Det. = 300°
1 35° Isothermal


Column temp, held at 80° for
4 min programmed to 300°C at
8°/min and held at 300° for
4 min
Column temp, held at 80°C for
4 min and programmed to
300°C at 8° /min and
held at 300° for 4 min



Column temp, at 80° for 4 min
and programmed to 300° at
8° /min and held for 4 min

Column temp, at 80°C for 4 min
programmed to 300° at
8° /min and held for 4 min



30/70 methylene
chloride/ hexane, at 1 mL/min
55/45 acetonitrile/water.
1 mL/min
15/85 methylene
chloride/ hexane, at 1 mL/min
40/60 acetonitrile/water
at 1 mL/min
40/60 acetonitrile/water
at 1 mL/min
50/50 acetonitrile/water
at 1 mL/min
Retention
Time (min.)
4.2
9.7
3.6
4.4
5.5
8.4
5.6
9.9

18.1



22.6
21.4
28.1
23. 1
20.5
30.0
18.3
30.6
23.0
21.9
19.9
18.2
24.2
17.9
23.8
20.2
19.6
8.6

14.1

6.6
9.3
6.2

9.3

8.4


-------
     J.  S.  Warner,  T. M.  Engel, and P. J.  Mondron are  with Battelle Columbus
       Laboratories, Columbus, OH 43201; the EPA author Thomas A. Pressley (also
       the EPA Project Officer, see below) is with the Environmental Monitoring and
       Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
     This Project Summary covers 13 separate reports, entitled:
       "Determination of Thiophosphates in Industrial and Municipal Wastewaters—
        Aspon, Dichlorofenthion, Famphur,  Fenitrothion,  Fonofos, Phosmet, and
        Thionazin," (Order No. PB 85-189 017/AS: Cost: $10.00)
       "Determination of Thiocarbamates in Industrial and Municipal Wastewater—
        Butylate, Cycloate. EPTC, Molinate, Pebulate, and Vernotate,"(Order No. PB
        85-189 009/AS; Cost: $10.00)
       "Determination of Neutral Nitrogen-Containing Pesticides in Industrial and
        Municipal Wastewaters—Fenarimol, MGK 264, MGK 326, and Pronamide,"
        (Order No. PB 85-189 157/AS; Cost: $10.00)
       "C, H, and O  Compounds—Cycloprate,  Kinoprene. Methoprene, and Res-
        methrin."(Order No. PB 85-188 951/AS; Cost: $10.00)
       "Determination of Volatile Pesticides in Industrial and Municipal Wastewaters,"
        (Order No. PB 85-189 918/AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination of Bendiocarb in Industrial and Municipal Wastewaters,"
        (Order No. PB 85-188 159/AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination ofBensulide in Industrial and Municipal Wastewaters, "(Order
        No. PB 85-188 9777AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination ofRotenone in Industrial and Municipal Wastewaters." (Order
        No. PB 85-188 993/AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination of Oryzalin in Industrial and Municipal Wastewaters," (Order
        No. PB 85-188 985/AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination of Diphenylamine in Industrial and Muncipal Wastewaters."
        (Order No. PB 85-190 874/AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination of Mercaptobenzothiazole in Industrial and Municipal Waste-
        waters." (Order No. PB 85-191 120/AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination of Hexachlorophene and Dichlorophen in Industrial and
        Municipal Wastewaters."(Order No. PB 85-188 209/AS; Cost: $8.50)
       "Determination of MBTS and TCMTB in  Industrial and Municipal Waste-
        waters," (Order No. PB 85-189 025/AS; Cost: $8.50)
     The above reports will be available only from: (cost subject to change)
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield. VA22161
             Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
             Environmental Monitoring  and Support Laboratory
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Cincinnati, OH 45268
                                                                                  U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1985-559-016/27
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300



-------