United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory
Las Vegas NV 89114
Research and Development
EPA/600/S4-86/010  July 1986
Project  Summary
National  Surface  Water  Survey:
Eastern  Lake  Survey
Phase   I—Synoptic  Chemistry
Field  Operations  Report

Franklin A. Morris, David V. Peck, Michael B. Bonoff, and Kevin J. Cabbie
  The National Surface Water Survey is
 a  three-phase program designed  to
 address  increasing concern over
 potential  acidification of U.S. surface
 waters by atmospheric deposition.
 Phase I of  the Eastern Lake  Survey
 (ELS-I) was  conducted during autumn
 1984 as a synoptic chemical survey to
 characterize lakes located in regions of
 the  eastern  U.S.  believed to be
 susceptible  to the effects of acidic
 deposition.  This document describes
 planning  activities  and  summarizes
 field operations of the Eastern Lake
 Survey—Phase I.
  Prior to Phase  I  field operations,
 preliminary experiments and pilot field
 studies were conducted to test field
 sampling methodology and assumptions,
 laboratory procedure and methodology,
 and logistical constraints. Eight locations
 in the eastern U.S. were selected as field
 station sites  for the ELS-I.  Lake water
 samples and in  situ chemical  and
 physical data from 1798 lakes were
 collected using helicopters. Field
 sampling methodologies are described
 in the final report. Water samples were
 returned to mobile laboratories located
 at  the field stations.  Certain analyses
 were performed  at the mobile
 laboratories, and the samples were split
 into  aliquots and  preserved for later
 analyses at contract analytical
 laboratories.
 In  general, field  sampling and field
 laboratory activities proceeded
smoothly. Pertinent results, observations,
and recommendations for improvement
regarding field operations are included.
These recommendations and observations
may  be valuable to planners of similar
projects.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Office of Acid Deposition,
Environmental Monitoring and Quality
Assurance. Washington. DC. to
announce key findings of the research
project  that is fully documented in a
separate report  of the same title (see
Project Report ordering information at
back).

Introduction
  The National Surface Water Survey
(NSWS) is a three-phase program
designed and implemented by the U.S.
Environmental Protection  Agency (EPA)
as part of the National Acid Precipitation
Assessment Program (NAPAP) to address
the  increasing concern over potential
acidification of U.S. surface waters by
atmospheric deposition Phase I of the
Eastern Lake Survey  (ELS-I)  was
conducted during the fall  of 1984 as a
synoptic chemical survey to characterize
lakes, at one point in time, located in
regions  of the Eastern United States
believed to be susceptible to the effects of
acid deposition. The EPA's Environmental
Monitoring Systems Laboratory—Las
Vegas, Nevada (EMSL-LV) was charged
with overseeing and supervising the field
operations for the ELS-I. Logistical and
personnel support for ELS-I was provided
by Lockheed Engineering and Management
Services Company, Inc. (Lockheed-EMSCO).
The  final report  describes the planning
activities and  summarizes  field
operations of the  ELS-I.

-------
  The research plan for the ELS-I, drafted
in October 1983, was reviewed by more
than 100 scientists  and other potential
data users. A meeting of 50 scientists and
policy-makers  was  held in  December
1983 to review and  modify the research
plan. The revised research plan and  its
statistical design was subjected to further
peer review before field operations
began. Sampling and analytical
methodologies,  the  quality  assurance
plan, and the  logistics plan  were
developed for  the ELS-I  based on the
revised research  plan.

Preliminary  Activities
  Helicopters were chosen as the ideal
tool to sample  a  large number of lakes
over a broad geographic area in a short
period of time.  Because only one sample
was to be taken from each lake, the most
suitable time to  sample  was a period
when the lakes would be mixed and the
samples would be most representative of
the chemistry of  the entire lake.  These
mixing periods occur during  the spring
and again during the fall through early
winter.
  Two   pilot studies  were  conducted
during the winter and spring  of 1984 to
assess the proposed research and field
operations plans  of  the ELS-I. The pilot
studies provided an  opportunity  to
establish  the  expected  range  of
concentrations of the chemical  vanbles,
and to  test the proposed  analytical
methods. The pilot studies also allowed
evaluation  of other   aspects of the
research plan: lake  selection, proposed
sampling protocols, quality  assurance
program, and  data  management. The
winter survey  demonstrated that sam-
pling  lakes  through the ice was  not
an effective  procedure, due to the
difficulty of finding  lakes covered  by
snow,  sampling under hazardous
conditions,  and the   increased  time
needed to  collect samples at low
temperatures. The spring pilot study was
more successful, leading to the decision
that sampling  during  the fall  turnover
period only would achieve the objectives
of ELS-I.
   During the pilot studies, several other
assumptions related to field sampling
were  experimentally tested.  One major
concern was that the helicopter's
exhaust fumes,  might  contaminate  the
samples. Samples were taken from a lake
using a boat, then from a helicopter. No
significant differences were  found
between the  means   of 22 chemical
parameters  (n=7) from  the  boat  and
helicopter samples, and it was concluded
that the helicopter had no effect on the
quality of the water samples collected.
  Preparation for  field  operations
included procurement  of all the
necessary equipment, training of the field
and  laboratory personnel,  base site
selection, and  laboratory transportation
and  set up.  All Lockheed-EMSCO
personnel were trained in Las Vegas for
aspects of  either  field or  laboratory
operations, including safety.  Field
samplers provided by  EPA regional
offices and state agencies were trained at
several field stations Eight field stations
were selected in the eastern U.S  where
the   mobile  laboratories  were
located: Bangor,  ME; Lake Placid,  NY;
Lexington, MA; Mt. Pocono, PA; Duluth,
MN; Rhinelander, Wl; Asheville, NC; and
Lakeland, FL Remote  base sites were
also established at some field stations as
a  base  for  helicopter  operations,
generally for sampling  lakes outside  a
150 mile radius from the field station

Field Station Operations
  Fifteen people staffed each field
station, including management
personnel, helicopter  pilots  and
mechanics,  and   laboratory  and  field
crews. All personnel reported to the base
coordinator, who was responsible for the
overall operation of the field station  Each
station  had  a communications  room
where the field sampling activities could
be  closely  monitored  for  safety and
coordination. A communications center
in Las  Vegas  was  used to track the
number  and  type  of  lakes sampled,
compile helicopter flight hours and
weather forecasts, coordinate and track
quality assurance (QA)  and analytical
samples, and ship supplies to the field
stations
Field Sampling Operations
  Strict QA measures were followed to
maintain consistency  in field sampling
protocols,  and to ensure that field data
and water samples would yield results of
a  high and  known  quality  Hydrolab
4041* water quality analyzer units were
calibrated every morning  and checked
before and after sampling with solutions
of known pH and conductivity. Each field
team collected a field blank sample every
day  to  provide estimates of analytical
detectibility and check for contamination
in their sampling procedure. Duplicate
samples were  also collected daily  for
'Mention of trade names does not constitute en-
 dorsement by the U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency.
each field station to estimate the overall
precision of ELS-I methodologies.
  When a lake was approached from the
air, the lake identity  was verified from
maps and from the LORAN-C guidance
system in each helicopter, and then the
lake was photographed. If the lake was
accessible,  the helicopter  would  land,
and the pilot would locate the deepest
point in the lake by use of a depth finder.
Secchi disk transparency was determined
using a Secchi disk. Temperature (for
determination of the stratification status
of the  lake), pH, and conductivity  were
measured in situ with the Hydrolab unit.
Water samples were collected from  1.5m
with a 6.2 L Van Dorn bottle.  Two 60-ml
syringes were rinsed and filled with water
from the Van  Dorn bottle. pH  and dis-
solved  inorganic carbon (DIG) were de-
termined using these samples at the field
lab. A 4-LCubitainer was rinsed and filled
with water  from the Van Dorn. All field
data was recorded on standardized forms.
The  data forms,  syringes,   and  water
samples were delivered to the field labo-
ratory within 8 hours of collection.

Field  Laboratory Operations
  Field laboratory crews processed and
preserved samples as soon as possible
after collection,  and  conducted certain
analyses  Every trailer contained a
laminar flow hood used as a contaminat-
ion-free work area, a high-quality  water
purification unit, freezer and refrigerator
space, instrumentation to  perform
measurements of DIG, pH, turbidity, and
true color. Each laboratory was staffed by
five  persons each  with  clearly defined
responsibilities, lab coordinator, lab
supervisor, and three analysts.
   The  samples  were organized  into a
batch  for  processing  as   they  were
received from field sampling crews. Audil
samples of known composition were alsc
added to the routine, duplicate, and blank
samples from the field for quality
assurance  All the information from eacr
batch, including  the results of  the
chemical analyses performed on site
were recorded onto a standardized batch
form. Seven aliquots from each samplf
were prepared and preserved for mor<
detailed chemical analyses.  Preparatior
involved filtration  (0.45 /jm membrani
filters) of or pouring aliquots of sample
into amber  polyethylene  bottles. Ar
aluminum  extraction procedure using 8
hydroxyquinolme  and methyl  isobuty
ketone was carried out to  prepare oni
aliquot.  The  preserved  aliquots wen
shipped the next day for delivery to one o
four contract analytical laboratone

-------
within 24 hours. Additional aliquots were
also  prepared and  sent  to  the
Environmental Research Laboratory  in
Corvallis,  OR  for elemental analyses
Some field laboratories prepared aliquots
that  were  shipped  to  laboratories  in
Norway and Canada. Data forms were
sent daily  to Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, where the  data  base  was
managed and to quality  assurance
personnel in Las Vegas.  A shipping form
for each container of samples sent was
also  sent daily to  the  NSWS sample
management office

Summary of Field Operations
  Of the  1876 lakes  initially selected for
sampling during ELS-I, 1763 were visited
and 1612 were actually sampled. Some
of the selected lakes were not visited due
to time constrictions coupled with bad
weather. Visited lakes were not sampled
if they  were ice-covered, had  a
conductance  over  1,500^8 cm"1, had
flowing water, or if landing  conditions
were hazardous. Only 5 percent of the
lakes sampled were themally stratified
when they were sampled. An additional
199  lakes were selected as  "special
interest" lakes on recommendation from
various federal and state  agencies.
Samples were collected from 186 special
interest lakes.
  Field laboratories delivered 2,399
samples  to the contract analytical
laboratories, at an average daily
processing rate of 20 samples per field
laboratory per day.
  Field operations for the ELS-I were
conducted such  that the  project  was
completed  on schedule  A sufficient
number of lake samples were collected
and analyzed to satisfy the objectives of
the research  plan.  To assist others
planning operations  similar to  ELS-I,  a
summary of pertinent cost information,
observations, and recommendations are
provided in the final report. Similarly, the
final  report contains  a section on
recommendations and  observations  to
improve the field operations of future
NSWS  activities or other similar surveys.
  This  report  is submitted  in partial
fulfillment of contracts 68-03-3050 and
68-03-3249 by Lockheed Engineering
and  Management Services  Company,
Inc.,  under the sponsorship of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.

-------
    Franklin A. Morris, David V. Peck, Michael B. Bonoff, and Kevin J. Cabbie are with
      Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Co., Inc., Las Vegas,  NV
      89109.
    Robert E. Crowe is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
    The complete report, entitled "National Surface Water Survey: Eastern Lake
      Survey, Phase I—Synoptic Chemistry—Field Operations Report,"(Order No. PB
      86-196 680/AS; Cost: $ 11.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield,  VA  22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Project Officer  can be contacted at:
            Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Las Vegas,  NV 89114
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
                                                                                                             w .;„  t..
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S4-86/010
               0000329    PS
                CHICAGO

-------