United States
                     Environmental Protection
                     Agency
Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                     Research and Development
EPA/600/S4-86/046  Apr 1987
oEPA         Project Summary
                    Laboratory and Field  Evaluation
                    of the Semi-VOST Method
                    J. Margeson, J Bursey, J. Steger, M. Palazzolo, D. Benson, J. Homolya,
                    R. McAllister, J. McGaughey, and D. Wagoner
                      Laboratory studies and a second field
                    evaluation have been completed to
                    assess the performance of the Semi-
                    Volatile Organic Sampling Train (Semi-
                    VOST) method for measuring concen-
                    trations of principal organic hazardous
                    constituents  (POHCs) with boiling
                    points greater than 100°C emitted from
                    hazardous waste  incineration.  The
                    Semi-VOST Methodology was tested
                    initially through a series of laboratory
                    experiments and  a field  test at a
                    hazardous waste incinerator. In the first
                    field test method  precision and bias
                    were shown to be compound specific.
                    Laboratory studies demonstrated that
                    method precision and bias were related
                    to the  distribution and recovery of
                    POHCs throughout the components of
                    the sampling train.  Distribution and re-
                    covery of a POHC are related to boiling
                    point, water solubility, and chemical
                    functionality.
                      Laboratory experiments have demon-
                    strated that, since  basic organic com-
                    pounds form salts by reaction with the
                    acidic and wet environment found in
                    stack emissions  sampled  with the
                    Semi-VOST method, these compounds
                    can be recovered by appropriate treat-
                    ment of aqueous train components. A
                    screening procedure was developed to
                    select the extraction  solvent and to
                    estimate the analytical recovery of the
                    test compounds from acidic water con-
                    densate  using the sample preparation
                    methodology.
                      A second field test was performed at
                    a hazardous waste incinerator using five
                    gaseous  deuterated compounds to
                    dynamically spike four simultaneously
                    operating semi-VOST trains. Estimates
                    of method precision and bias are given
for ds-pyridine, ds-toluene, d5-chloro-
benzene, d10-o-xylene, and d2-1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane. Results of distribu-
tive volume experiments to compare
chromatographically determined com-
pound retention  volumes with values
determined in the field are presented.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Environmental  Monitoring
Systems Laboratory, Research Triangle
Park, NC, to announce key findings of
the research project that is fully docu-
mented in a separate report of the same
title (see Project Report ordering in-
formation at back).

Introduction
  The Solid Waste Disposal  Act, as
amended by the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1975 (RCRA), re-
quires that the U.S  Environmental Pro-
tection Agency (EPA) establish a national
regulatory program  to ensure that haz-
ardous wastes are managed in a manner
which does not endanger human health
or the environment.  The statute requires
EPA  to promulgate performance stan-
dards for hazardous waste management
Included in the  regulations that have
been promulgated  are provisions for
waste disposal by incineration and re-
quirements that hazardous waste incin-
erators be so operated that the principal
organic hazardous constituents (POHCs)
are destroyed and/or removed  with a
minimum efficiency  of 99.99 percent To
determine destruction and  removal ef-
ficiency (ORE),  EPA has designated the
Semi-Volatile Organic  Sampling Train
(Semi-VOST) Method as the method for
measuring  flue gas concentrations of
POHCs with boiling points greater than
100°C.

-------
  The Quality Assurance Division of the
EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory (EMSL) has responsibility for
evaluating and standardizing EPA source
test  methods.  Under contract to EMSL,
Radian Corporation is providing technical
assistance in evaluating  the Semi-VOST
Method. The objective of the Semi-VOST
program is to provide the data necessary
to determine the bias, precision, applica-
bility, and limitations of the method.
  The technical approach used to collect
these data is a multi-task effort involving
literature,  laboratory,  and  field  studies.
An initial field test, which utilized a quad-
train approach, provided preliminary data
on method bias and precision. As a result
of the recommendations developed from
the first field study, additional laboratory
studies and a second  field  test at a
hazardous  waste   incinerator were
performed.
  The experimental design of the labora-
tory evaluations and  the second semi-
VOST  test was  based  on  experience
gained from  the initial test and  data
gathered from laboratory  studies. The
second test again utilized a quad-train to
evaluate  the  method performance  by
sampling flue  gas from  a  full-scale in-
cinerator while spiking test compounds
into the sampling trains. The objectives
of the program were to:

  •  design and conduct an experimental
     laboratory program to evaluate com-
     pound stability  in  the  extraction
     solvent and the effect of water
     solubility and compound functionality
     on the recovery of selected  test
     compounds;
  •  develop a screening procedure for
     Appendix  VIII water-soluble  com-
     pounds to provide  information for
     selecting  an extraction solvent and
     for estimating  recovery  of water-
     soluble compounds  from the acidic
     water condensate;
  •  design, construct, and evaluate the
     performance of  a dynamic spiking
     system  using   deuterated  test
     compounds;
  •  carry out a second field test  at a
     hazardous waste incineration facility
     to provide additional data on method
     precision and bias for additional test
     compounds; and
  •  compare  retention  volumes deter-
     mined in the laboratory for selected
     test  compounds  on XAD-2®  resin
     with values determined in the field
     by a  series of  distributive volume
     experiments sampling flue gas from
     a hazardous waste incinerator.
Procedures


  In the  application of the Semi-VOST
method, gaseous and paniculate compo-
nents are isokinetically withdrawn from
an emission source and collected  in a
multicomponent  sampling  train.  Key
elements  of the  train  include a  high-
efficiency particulate filter and a packed
bed of a porous polymeric adsorbent resin
(XAD-2®). The filter is used to separate
stack gas particles  from gaseous sub-
stances which are then adsorbed onto
XAD-2®. Following sample collection, the
train components are extracted with sol-
vent, the extracts  concentrated,  and
specific compounds are identified/quanti-
fied using high resolution gas chromato-
graphy coupled with low resolution mass
spectrometry. After returning the samples
to the laboratory, all fractions are spiked
with surrogate standards prior to extrac-
tion, concentration, and analysis. Surro-
gates provide a measure of the efficiency
of the sample preparation procedures.
The  surrogate  compounds  should be
stable isotopically-labeled analogs of the
compounds of interest or compounds that
would  exhibit  properties similar to the
compounds of interest,  be easily chro-
matographed, and not interfer with the
analysis.  Potential surrogate  spiking
compounds  include: deuterated ethyl-
benzene, naphthalene, chrysene, phenol,
nitrobenzene, chlorobenzene and toluene.
  Previous evaluation of the Semi-VOST
method has shown that method precision
and bias are compound specific. Labora-
tory experiments demonstrated  that
method precision and bias are related to
the distribution and recovery of  a  par-
ticular POHC throughout the components
of the sampling train. Sample distribution
and  recovery of  a POHC are related  to
boiling point, water solubility, and chemi-
cal functionality.
  With these  parameters in mind the
following  laboratory experiments were
performed prior to the second field test in
order to:
  •  Define XAD-2® adsorbent resin in-
     teractions and/or analytical proce-
     dure  interferences  responsible for
     poor  and/or variable  recoveries  of
     particular POHCs.
  •  Evaluate method  interferences due
     to interaction with or  in the solvent
     matrix by determining the stability
     of aniline,  pyridine,  phenol,  and
     resorcinol in the extraction solvent
     (methylene chloride).
  •  Develop a  method  for  screening
     Appendix VIII POHCs  to identify in-
    teractions with Semi-VOST analyti-
    cal procedures.
  • Determine the retention volumes of
    toluene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane,
    chlorobenzene, pyridine,  and  q-
    xylene on XAD-2®resin to estimate
    breakthrough volumes for field dis-
    tributive volume experiments.
  The second Semi-VOST field evaluation
was designed based on experience and
data  gained from  the  initial field and
laboratory studies.  Both the first and
second field tests utilized a Semi-VOST
train  in a quad train  configuration  to
evaluate  method performance by sam-
pling flue gas from a full-scale incinerator
while spiking test compounds into the
sampling trains. The  objectives of the
second field test were to: 1) provide addi-
tional data on method bias and precision,
2) compare  laboratory retention volume
data for selected compounds to field data,
and 3) evaluate the stability of selected
compounds spiked onto the XAD-2®resin
by both dynamic gaseous spiking and
liquid spiking.

Results and Discussion
  Toluene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, and
chlorobenzene were included in the first
field test. Pyridine was selected based on
its potential to form salts in the presence
of hydrochloric acid. o-Xylene was added
due to its large retention volume on XAD-
2® resin and its use as an internal stan-
dard in the Semi-VOST laboratory experi-
ments. To assess any interferences due
to solvent interactions, the stabilities of
aniline, pyridine, phenol, and resorcinol
in methylene chloride  were  evaluated.
The concentrations of the four test com-
pounds remained within 10  percent  of
the original value for  up to  118 days.
Therefore, no major solvent-compound
interactions were  observed during the
typical Semi-VOST sample storage time.
Aniline and pyridine, which are basic
organic compounds, will react in an acidic
environment to form salts. These  salts
are insoluble in methylene chloride but
are soluble in water, which is also present
in the system.  These  reactions to form
salts and the Soxhlet extraction procedure
are partially responsible for poor and
variable recoveries from  XAD-2® resin.
Acid/base extraction must be performed
on the aqueous phase from the XAD-2®
resin  to  obtain good  recovery of salt-
forming compounds.
  Breakthrough or specific  retention
volume (Vg) is the sample volume required
to elute a compound which is  introduced
onto a XAD-2® resin bed. Before break-

-------
through occurs, the amount of spiked
material adsorbed on the resin bed is
directly proportional to the volume sam-
pled.  Moreover, the adsorbate-sample
volume relationship must pass through
the origin. After the breakthrough volume
has been  reached, the amount of ad-
sorbate is no longer proportional to the
sample volume, but approaches a  hori-
zontal asymptotic value equal  to the
equilibrium loading.
  In the present study, laboratory mea-
surements  were made at several  tem-
peratures and values of In (V/T) vs. I/T.
These values were fitted by linear regres-
sion  to obtain an equation from which
the breakthrough volume estimates could
be made.  The resin employed for the
laboratory studies was from the same lot
as the resin used for the subsequent field
study. Carrier flow rate for the laboratory
studies was selected to simulate the face
velocity at the adsorbent  cartridge. Lab-
oratory retention volumes, breakthrough
volumes, and breakthrough times for five
compounds are summarized in Table 1.
The data in Table 1  indicate that for the
2-hour precision and bias tests performed
in the field, none of the compounds was
expected to break through the XAD-2®
resin  except pyridine. Pyridine  is water
soluble and would be expected to pass
through the resin and be collected in the
condensate.
  Three quad-probe distributive volume
tests  were conducted  to compare the
results of laboratory breakthrough volume
studies to data obtained in the field. Dur-
ing these tests, three of the trains  were
spiked at 100 MOL with five deuterated
compounds and one train was operated
unspiked. The three spiked trains provided
a triplicate set of samples for breakthrough
analysis and the unspiked train a blank or
background sample. Table 2 presents the
distributive volume data generated from
the field test.
  The data  of Table 2 were  tested to
determine  if the breakthrough volume
had been reached using an  F statistic
which measured the lack of fit of the data
to a  straight line through the origin. If
there were no lack of fit, the breakthrough
volume had not been reached. If there
were  a lack of fit to the linear relationship
the breakthrough volume had been ex-
ceeded. The field test distributive volume
data demonstrated that d10-o-xylene and
d2-tetrachloroethane did  not break
through the XAD-2® resin bed and that
the retention volume determined experi-
mentally in  the laboratory was not ex-
ceeded. The field test distributive volume
results for ds-toluene and d5-chloroben-
                                         Table 1.    Retention Volume
Compound
Toluene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetra-
chloroethane
Chlorobenzene
Pyridine
o-Xylene
Retention
Volume
mL/gat20°C
137,277
1,430,672
450.473
68.896
1.021,676
Sampling
Flow Rate
cfm'
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Breakthrough
Volume
nr>(ft3)
2.72(96)
28.6 (101 1}
9.001318)
1.36(48)
20.4 (720)
Time for
Breakthrough
h
3.2
33.7
10.6
1.6
24.0
 '0.50 cubic foot/minute (cfm) is equivalent to O.OO0236 rrf/s.
 Table 2.    Distributive Volume, Adsorption Results
Sample
Volume
m3
1.66
1.64
2.66
5.05
5.00
5.00
9.98
10.04
10.14
Adsorbate
da-toluene
ng
934
954
1291
2297
1698
2071
3041
1698
2037
d5 -chlorobenzene
ng
174
173
323
632
553
615
781
647
607
d;0-o-xylene
ng
937
924
1315
2764
2553
2805
6908
5584
4737
d2-tetrachloroethane
ng
94
92
192
291
290
270
492
530
462
zene confirmed that, for sample volumes
greater than the retention volumes deter-
mined in  the laboratory, the total com-
pound mass collected on the resin departs
from a linear correlation with the sample
volume. For the distributive volumes used
in the field test, about 88 percent of the
d5-pyridine was found in the  water
impingers following the XAD-2® adsorp-
tion bed. These results show that break-
through had occurred, confirming  the
laboratory measurements.
  Five tests were performed with  the
quad-probe to assess method precision
and bias.  Five deuterated  compounds
were spiked into the sample trains at the
100 MDL level during the five tests to
provide data on precision and bias. Table
3  summarizes  the  results of precision
and bias determinations. Bias was cal-
culated relative to percent recovery of the
spiked compound, and precision in terms
of standard deviations and percent coef-
ficients of variation of  the  percent re-
coveries for each spiked compound. The
bias ranged from -29.0 percent for d5-
pyridine to 0.9  percent for d,0-g-xylene.
Pyridine was the  only compound tested
which has significant  water solubility.
Because of the high moisture content of
the stack  gases, several liters of water
condensate were extracted for prepara-
tion of the samples. Recovery of a water-
soluble  compound is far less  efficient
when it must be extracted from a large
volume using  multiple extraction and
concentration steps. An analysis of vari-
ance of compound recovery showed the
mean percent recoveries were not equal
at a level of significance less than 0.005.
Method bias, therefore, was  compound
specific, or at  least specific  by  classes,
e.g., water-soluble.
  Precision in terms of percent coefficient
of variation ranged from 8.1  percent for
d,0-q-xylene  to 32.9  percent  for  d2-
tetrachloroethane. A Bartlett Test for
homogeneity of compound variances of
percent recovery showed that there was
essentially zero probability that the com-
pound  variances were  equal. From  the
results of this study it was not possible to
give an overall, or pooled, variance, stan-
dard deviation, or coefficient of variation
for  all  compounds  tested. Rather,  the
precision  was  compound  specific. The
percent coefficient of variation for ds-
pyridine was not significantly different
from that of d8-toluene or d5-chloroben-
zene for these three compounds, as the
precision did  not seem to be related to
the water-solubility characteristics.
  Two quad-probe samples were collected
to provide information on sample stability.
Two trains were spiked with the five
deuterated compounds using the dynamic
spiking system. The other two trains re-
mained unspiked during  the flue  gas

-------
Table 3.    Summary of Precision and Bias Results
                                                              Precision
Compound
ds-pyridine
dg-toluene
ds-chlorobenzene
d,0-o_-xylene
d2-tetrachloroethane
Number
of Valid
Samples
16'
13*
13
13
13
Mean%
Recovery
71.0
85.1
86.2
99.1
81.5
Percent
Bias3
-29.0
-14.9
-13.8
-0.9
-18.5
Standard
Deviation
12.6
12.4
11.8
8.0
26.8
Percent
Coefficient
of Variation
17.7
14.6
13.7
8.1
32.9
 ' Run 03B samples went to dryness in preparation; data were discarded.
 2 Runs 01 A. 01C. and 01D were discarded because of the sequence of extractions  and
 concentrations. For all of the remaining samples, the Soxhlet extract of the XAD-21* was the final
 aliquot concentrated.
 3 Percent bias = Mean % recovery-100
sampling, but were spiked with a liquid
containing the same five compounds
using a  syringe immediately after  the
sampling. The liquid spiked samples were
analyzed with other samples  collected
during the testing and  were used to
assess compound  loss  due to sample
transport, preparation and analysis. The
two  dynamically spiked  samples were
stored for five weeks and nine weeks  and
then analyzed. Results are shown in Table
4. The data from  the two quad-probe
stability samples show that the holding
time (up  to 63 days) between  sampling
and analysis does not significantly affect
the results obtained. Greater  variation
was encountered between different sets
of recoveries  obtained  from  duplicate
liquid spiking experiments than  when
two  sets of  recoveries  obtained from
dynamic  spiking are compared or when
dynamic  spiking was compared to liquid
spiking.
Conclusions and
Recommendations
  Several conclusions and recommenda-
tions have been made regarding the use
of the Semi-VOST method for the mea-
surement of POHCs with boiling points
greater than 100°C that are emitted from
hazardous  waste incinerators. These
include:
  • Method  precision and  bias were
    shown to be compound specific and
    could  not be generalized  for all
    classes of organic compounds. Lab-
    oratory and field experiments dem-
    onstrated that method precision and
    bias are related to the distribution
    and recovery of a particular POHC
    throughout the components of the
    sampling train.
• Sample distribution and recovery of
  POHCs are related to boiling point,
  water solubility, and chemical func-
  tionality. Field studies verified these
  conclusions using a variety of POHCs
  exhibiting a range of boiling points,
  water  solubilities, and chemical
  functionalities.
• XAD-2® adsorbent samples must be
  extracted immediately after removal
  from the resin cartridge for optimum
  analyte recoveries. Samples that are
  allowed to stand in Soxhlets at room
  temperature prior to extraction may
  lose compounds. The compound loss
  due to volatilization is related to its
  vapor pressure.
• Dynamic spiking of the Semi-VOST
  train  using deuterated compounds
  was demonstrated  as a  viable ap-
  proach to  determine method  bias
  under field conditions. In the absence
  of  measurable stack emissions of
  POHCs, dynamic spiking can be used
  to measure method precision.
• Method precision for d5-pyridine was
   17.7 percent coefficient of variation.
  This  value was derived from  16
  determinations of  percent  recovery
  from field test data using the dynamic
  spiking  system. Method bias  cal-
  culated from these data was -29.0
  percent.
•  Method precision for d8-toluene was
   14.6  percent coefficient of variation
  and method bias was -14.9 percent,
  derived from 13 determinations of
  percent recovery during the second
  field  test.  These  values compare
  favorably with a method bias of = 1.0
   percent determined for  toluene in
  the first field study.
• Method precision  for d,0-o-xylene
   was 8.1 percent coefficient of varia-
   tion and method bias was -0.9 per-
  cent, derived from 14 determinations
  of percent recovery for the same
  field test.
• Method precision for d2-tetrachloroe-
  thane was 32.9 percent coefficient
  of variation and  method bias was
  -18.5 percent, derived from 13 deter-
  minations  of percent recovery for
  the same field test. An  estimate of
  method bias from the first field study
  was -16.0 percent.
• Method precision for ds-chloroben-
  zene was 13.7 percent coefficient of
  variation and method bias was -13.8
  percent, derived from 13 determina-
  tions of percent recovery for the
  same  field test. In the first  field
  study,  method precision for chloro-
  benzene was estimated to be 19.9
  percent. Method bias for chloroben-
  zene was not determined in the first
  field study because of the large con-
  centration  of chlorobenzene in the
  stack gas.
• All compounds  spiked  on  XAD-2®
  resin  with the  exception of d2-
  tetrachloroethane exhibited better
  precision and recovery than pyridine,
  which  was  collected  in  the  con-
  densate and impingers. The poorer
  precision for d2-tetrachloroethane is
  in part due to the variability in the
  measurement of this compound near
  the method detection limit.
• The field  test  distributive  volume
  experiments demonstrated that d,0-
  o-xylene and d2-tetrachloroethane
  did not break through  the XAD-2®
  resin  bed  and  that the  retention
  volume determined experimentally
  in the  laboratory was not exceeded.
  Therefore, the  Semi-VOST method
  is adequate  for the sampling and
  analysis of  d10-g-xylene  and d2-
  tetrachloroethane.
• The field  test  distributive  volume
  experiments for d8-toluene and d6-
  chlorobenzene  confirmed that, for
  sample volumes greater than the
  retention volumes determined in the
  laboratory, the total compound mass
  collected on the resin departs from a
  linear  correlation with  the sample
  volume. The result  verifies that
  laboratory data can be used to pre-
  dict field  retention  volumes for
  POHCs.
• Retention volumes  determined
  chromatographically in the laboratory
  were  used to  determine sampling
  volumes for the field  test. Experi-
  mental data from the field test sup-
  port the use of laboratory-determined

-------
Table 4.    Semi- I/OS T Field Test Percent Recovery Results
                                               Run 08
                               Dynamic Spike
                   Liquid Spike
Compound
ds-pyridine
da -toluene
d5 -chlorobenzene
dw-o-xylene
d2-tetrach/oroethane
Train A
54.3
948
956
997
1146
Tram B
699
990
983
101 2
1070
Train C
1043
111 6
859
972
86 1
Tram D
1049
1129
1000
989
91 1
Run 08
Compound
                               Dynamic Sp/ke
                   Liquid Spike
                            Train A
                                         Train B
              Train C
Train D
ds -pyr/dme
d8- toluene
ds- chlorobenzene
dw-o-xylene
d2 - tetrachloroethane
840
785
91 8
1063
1439
1002
850
943
107 1
1349
944
67 1
633
77 7
554
856
709
704
798
822
    retention volumes  to  predict field
    breakthrough volumes.
    Pyridme is a basic organic compound
    that reacts with aqueous hydrochloric
    acid to form an organic chloride salt,
    which is highly water soluble  Ap-
    proximately  88 percent of  the
    pyridme is collected in the back-half
    (impinger solutions) of  the  Semi-
    VOSTtram.
   1 A difference in holding time before
    extraction for dynamically spiked
    XAD-2® samples (35  days vs. 63
    days) does not result in a significant
    difference in recoveries for all of the
    compounds spiked
    If the volume of condensate requires
    multiple extractions and  concentra-
    tions,  the extract of the aqueous
    tram components should be com-
    bined  with  the  XAD-2® extract at
    the final concentration step
    A comparison was made between
    observed values and expected levels
    of five compounds spiked onto XAD-
    2® quality control samples provided
    by  the Research Triangle Institute
    The percent bias ranged from -1.84
    percent to -8.90 percent with refer-
    ence to the RTI values Average per-
    cent  bias was -4 68 percent. The
    agreement is excellent, showing that
    the recovery of organic compounds
    from XAD-21"1 resin using the Semi-
    VOST methodology is favorable.
    The use of surrogate standards dur-
    ing sample preparation and analysis
    is necessary to obtain the best repre-
    sentation of test  compound re-
    coveries Deuterated analogs, when
    available, are the best possible sur-
    rogates because they behave exactly
    the same as the compounds of in-
    terest and will be truly representative
    of test compound recoveries.
  On  the  basis of laboratory and field
studies, the following recommendations
are made1
  • A literature review  should be con-
    ducted to categorize Appendix VIII
    compounds  according to  water
    solubility, chemical similarity  and
    adsorption  strength (retention  vol-
    ume) on XAD-2® to allow estimates
    of method precision and  bias  for
    compound  classes, since method
    bias and precision have been shown
    to be  compound specific. Predicted
    values  should  be  verified  by
    experiment
  • Laboratory studies have  demon-
    strated that low compound recoveries
    can be  attributed  to either poor
    chromatographic properties,  selec-
    tion of  inappropriate  solvent  for
    extraction,  or compound  reaction
    with the aqueous components of the
    sampling train which become acidic
    during sample  collection  Further
    laboratory studies are warranted to
    extend these observations  and to
    use Semi-VOST screening proce-
    dures to determine the applicability
    of the  sample  preparation  and
    analysis steps to other Appendix VIII
    compounds or classes of compounds
  • Earlier laboratory studies demon-
    strated  low compound  recoveries
    associated with NOX flue gas levels.
    Variation in compound recovery with
    NOX level should  be studied using
    solutions of pitric acid to simulate
condensate and impinger contents
for  evaluating compound reactivity
with NOX The results of the labora-
tory studies could then be used to
plan an additional field evaluation of
the  method to  include  artifact
formation
Laboratory and  field studies should
be  performed to differentiate be-
tween resin artifacts and Products
of  Incomplete  Combustion  (PICs)
present  in XAD-2®  resin resulting
from sampling  of stack emissions
from hazardous waste combustion
Paniculate  filters  from selected
Semi VOST  trains should be  chal-
lenged with known  POHC concen-
trations to evaluate POHC-particulate
matter interactions  during sample
collection
Further laboratory and field evalua-
tion studies should include an
evaluation of the applicability of the
Semi-VOST method to the measure-
ment of  Appendix VIM aldehydes,
aromatic amines such as diphenyla-
mine, and compounds that can only
be  analyzed  by high  performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) with
a selective detector

-------
     r/je EPA author, John Margeson (also the EPA  Project Officer, see below)
       is with Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Research Triangle
       Park, NC27711; andJ. Bursey, J. Steger, M. Palazzolo. D. Benson, J. Homolya.
       R. McAllister. J. McGaughey, and D. Wagoner are with Radian Corporation,
       Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
     The complete report,  entitled "Laboratory and Field Evaluation of the Semi-
       Vost Method, "(Order No. PB 87- 145934/AS; Cost: $30.95, subject to change)
       will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300
EPA/600/S4-86/046
                0000329   PS
                U S  ENVIR  PROTECTION  AGENCY
                !!soTol.!iS5Sa«!T5EET
                CHICAGO               IL   60604

-------