United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory
Las Vegas NV 89193
                    Research and Development
 EPA/600/S4-87/016 Aug. 1987
&EPA          Project Summary
                    Survey of Vendors of  External
                    Petroleum  Leak  Monitoring
                    Devices for Use with Underground
                    Storage Tanks
                    B. Eklund and W. Crow
                     Underground storage tanks (UST's)
                   and their associated piping are major
                   potential sources  of environmental
                   contamination. Since the 1984 Amend-
                   ments to the Resource Recovery and
                   Conservation Act (RCRA) require regu-
                   lation of underground storage tank
                   systems, the U.S. Environmental Pro-
                   tection Agency (EPA) is  currently in-
                   vestigating topics related to UST's to
                   aid in developing regulations. EPA has
                   contracted with the Radian Corporation
                   to compile information on the various
                   types of external (out-of-tank) moni-
                   toring systems or techniques which can
                   be used to detect leaks or spills of
                   petroleum hydrocarbon products. The
                   compiled data were used to categorize
                   external petroleum leak  monitoring
                   devices or techniques by functions and
                   type, and the data will aid in the future
                   development of uniform  performance
                   criteria for commercially  available ex-
                   ternal leak monitoring methods. The
                   present study, which is limited to ex-
                   ternal (outside-the-tank) petroleum leak
                   monitoring devices, supports the EPA
                   effort by providing information on the
                   number, type,  and performance capa-
                   bilities of available leak monitors.
                     The literature was searched to collect
                   general information on external petro-
                   leum leak monitors and, more specifi-
                   cally, to develop a list  of vendors.
                   Additional information was collected
                   from equipment vendors, trade groups,
                   and other researchers.
                     This Project Summary  was devel-
                   oped by EPA's Environmental Monitor-
ing Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas,
NV. to announce key findings of the
research project that is fully  docu-
mented in a separate report of the same
title (see Project  Report ordering
information at back).

Introduction
  Underground storage tanks (UST's) and
their associated piping are major potential
sources of environmental contamination.
Since  the 1984 Amendments to  the
Resource Recovery and Conservation Act
(RCRA) require regulation of underground
storage tank systems, the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA) is cur-
rently investigating topics related to UST's
to aid in developing regulations. EPA has
contracted with the Radian Corporation
to compile information on the various
types of external (out-of-tank) monitoring
systems or techniques which can be used
to detect leaks or  spills  of petroleum
hydrocarbon products. The compiled data
were used to categorize external petro-
leum leak monitoring devices or tech-
niques by function and type, and the data
will aid in  the future development of
uniform performance criteria for com-
mercially available external leak moni-
toring methods. The present study, which
is limited to external  (outside-the-tank)
petroleum leak monitoring devices, sup-
ports the EPA effort by providing informa-
tion on the number, type, and performance
capabilities of available leak monitors.
Procedures
  The  literature was searched to collect
general information on external petroleum

-------
leak monitors and, more specifically, to
develop a list of vendors. Additional in-
formation was collected from equipment
vendors, trade groups, and  other re-
searchers. A questionnaire soliciting in-
formation on leak monitoring devices was
developed  and sent  to  the  identified
vendors. The questionnaire covered six
topics: principle of operation, detection
specificity, detection capability,  experi-
ence, cost, and recommended procedures.
The vendor list included vendors of LIST
monitoring systems and detectors that
could potentially be used for the detection
of petroleum hydrocarbon leaks or spills.
It should be noted that this survey does
not necessarily represent a complete list
of  vendors  that  manufacture external
monitors for detecting petroleum leaks or
spills from  underground storage tanks
and piping. Some vendors were likely to
have  been  inadvertently  omitted, and
devices that are currently being marketed
could have  changed  since this  survey
was performed. However, these data will
be  useful  in identifying  the different
categories of commercial leak monitoring
devices and aiding in the development of
performance criteria for each monitoring
category.  This report  summarizes and
tabulates vendor responses to the ques-
tionnaire. The report also includes a dis-
cussion of related issues that remain to
be  resolved before  final  performance
criteria can be established.
  The data  collection  approach used in
this study has limitations. Reliance on
vendor-supplied data was necessary be-
cause of a  lack of published, objective
evaluative test results. However, since
these vendor data  have  not been in-
dependently  verified,  it is possible that
some of these data are erroneous, biased,
or self-serving.

Conclusions
  The literature search yielded relatively
little useful  information on  external leak
detection monitoring devices. The vendor
survey,  however, was successful in gain-
ing information from  approximately 70
percent of the vendors that were queried.
Except for a notable lack of data regarding
any common interference, operational,
or  maintenance  problems, vendor re-
sponses were generally thorough.
  A total  of  49 vendors was identified
that manufacture devices  related to the
out-of-tank  measurement of  petroleum
hydrocarbon spills or  leaks  from UST
installations. Vendor specifications were
received for  63 of 69 (91  percent) dif-
ferent  products. Survey  forms were
completed by 30 of the 42 vendors that
were queried. Survey forms were received
for  44 of the 62  (71 percent) devices
covered by the survey.
  Vendor responses provided a basis for
dividing the external (out-of-tank) leak
monitoring devices for UST systems into
four categories: intermittent liquid-phase
detection, intermittent gas-phase detec-
tion, continuous liquid-phase detection,
and continuous gas-phase detection. An
examination of vendor survey data yielded
the following information:

  • Commercial  external  (out-of-tank)
     leak monitors are designed primarily
     to detect leaks or spills of petroleum
     hydrocarbons;
  • Most leak monitoring systems can-
     not immediately distinguish between
     surface spills and leaks;
  • Most leak monitoring devices do not
     measure  leak rates, although some
     devices  (gaseous  detectors)  are
     capable of measuring  hydrocarbon
     concentrations;
  • No uniform performance  specifica-
     tions exist for external leak moni-
     toring devices;
  • Most leak monitoring  systems  re-
     quire the installation of observation
     wells or boreholes;
  • Vendor responses were limited with
     regard to:
     — Operational problems,
     — Interferences,
     — Maintenance problems, and
     — Performance testing procedures;
  • Most leak monitoring  systems can
     be retrofitted at existing UST instal-
     lations;
  • Intermittent monitoring techniques
     are more labor-intensive than con-
     tinuous techniques, but may be more
     reliable;
  • Gas-phase detection can be more
     sensitive than liquid-phase detection,
     but the instrumentation may be more
     subject to false alarms and subject
     to interferences.
  • Equipment and installation costs (for
     permanent external leak  detection
     systems)  may vary considerably as
     these costs are dependent on the
     type  of devices selected and  the
     number of sensors used in each
     installation, local construction codes
     and permitting costs, and local labor
     costs; and
  • Operational and maintenance costs
     for permanent external leak moni-
     toring systems may vary also but are
     thought to be low based on informa-
    tion  obtained  from equipmen
    vendors.
  The  performance  characteristics fo
each leak detection  category are sum
marized in Table 1. The data presented ir
Table 1 are based on information obtainec
from vendors and have not been verifiec
by independent testing; therefore, these
data may be biased.

-------
Table 1.    Characteristics of Leak Detection Sensors
                                                                   Leak Detection Category

Type of Compounds Detected
Detection Adjustable for
Specific Compounds
Potential Interferences
Severity of Interferences
False Positives or Negatives
Temperature Range
Can Systems Be Retrofitted?
Are Wells Required?
Can Devices Be Used in Wet Soils?
Years on Market
Detection Limits
Lower
Upper
Response Characteristics
Lag Time
Rise Time
Fall Time
Drift
Precision
Intermittent
Liquid-Phase
Liquid hydrocarbons
Generally not
None
Low
Unlikely
X)°C
Yes
Yes
Yes
>5
7/64 to 1/32 in.
None
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Continuous
Liquid-Phase
Vapor/liquid
hydrocarbons
Generally not
Physical and chemical
Variable
Unlikely
-45 to 120°C
Yes
Usually
Yes
0-15
1/32 to 1/8 in.
None
1 sec. to 10 hr.
1 sec. to 60 sec.
1 sec. to ?
N/A
Unknown
Intermittent
Gas-Phase
Hydrocarbon vapors
Varies between
techniques
Chemical
Potentially high
Both possible
-20 to 60°C
Yes
Usually
Yes
2-10
0. 1 to 15OO ppm
20OOppm to 100% LEL
1 sec.
3 sec. to 30 sec.
5 sec. to ?
Negligible to <1%/ day
full scale
5% to unknown
Continuous
Gas-Phase
Hydrocarbon vapors
Generally not
Chemical
Potentially high
Both possible
-70 to 70°C
Yes
Usually
Yes
0-20
10 to 100 ppm
1% to 100% LEL
1 sec. to 10 min.
1 sec. to 20 sec.
20 sec. to several minutes
Negligible to <1%/day
full scale
5% to unknown
 NOTE: The information presented in this table is based on information provided by vendors of monitoring devices and not on actual performance
       data which has been independently verified.
  B. Eklund and W. Crow are with Radian Corporation, Austin, TX 78766.
  J. Jeffrey van Ee is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  The complete report entitled "Survey of Vendors of External  Petroleum Leak
    Monitoring Devices for Use with Underground Storage Tanks," fOrder No.
    PB 87-212 346/AS; Cost: $18.95, subject to change) will be available only
    from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
          Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
          P. 0. Box 93478
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Las Vegas. NV89193

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
        .
	   "-
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S4-87/016
                                                          '
                                                                             ««""

-------