United States
                  Environmental Protection
                  Agency
Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory
Las Vegas NV 89193-3478
                  Research and Development
EPA/600/S4-89/007 Sept. 1989
&EPA         Project  Summary
                   Biological  Monitoring
                   Systems  for  Hazardous  Waste
                   Sites  (Production and
                   Analysis  of Analytical
                   Reference  Materials)
                  V. R. Bohman, C. R. Blincoe, G. C. Miller, R. L. Scholl, W. W. Sutton, and
                  L. R. Williams
                   Portions of EPA programs  in
                  pesticides, toxics,  and  hazardous
                  waste have a need for various types
                  of analytical reference material. The
                  current project has emphasized the
                  collection  and analysis of urine, fat,
                  and blood  from cattle exposed  to
                  selected toxicants for ultimate use as
                  reference samples. The project also
                  addressed the  practicality of using
                  certain metabolites produced by the
                  cattle to indicate  previous exposure
                  to chlorinated hydrocarbons and the
                  likelihood that these metabolites
                  could serve as conditions of expo-
                  sure even if an animal had ingested
                  small amounts of  many other chem-
                  icals such as might be present in the
                  vicinity of an uncontrolled hazardous
                  waste site.
                   The reference samples of urine, fat,
                  and other tissues can, with verified
                  compound concentrations, ultimately
                  be used as qualifying samples when
                  selecting  an analytical  laboratou
                  from among several candidates  jrj
                  when selecting the best technique'to
                  use for  a particular analysis. How-
                  ever, the reference materials may  be
                  of greatest benefit when used  by
                  laboratories to  determine analytical
                  accuracy  for samples  of human
                  urine, blood, etc. This is because the
                  standards, like the unknown samples,
                  will contain pollutant compounds and
                  associated  metabolites (all In vivo
incorporated) in an appropriate te»o-
logical matrix.    <
  Dairy animals were used during
this study primarily because substan-
tial  quantities of tissues and  body
fluids could be collected from the
previously dosed cattle.  WhMe  none
of (he individual study phases
included a thorough evaluation of
doslnq compound retention, excre-
tion, and/or metabolic degredation,
each animal was given daily  oral
doses of selected toxicants so that
the  urine, blood, etc., would contain
detectable concentrations of the
dosing compound(s) and some of the
associated  major metabolites.  Aliq-
uots of the respective large-volume
samples  were chemically analyzed
and, based on the  initial analytical
results, some of the samples  were
then selected, as potential reference
materials. Several confirming  anal-
yses (not part of this specific project)
wilj,  ultimately be conducted before
any  sample Is actually distributed as
an analytical reference  or quality
assurance material.
  The project report contains several
data summaries organized by individ-
ual animal  and by individual dosing
compound. Analytical and sample
preparation steps are discussed and
the analytical detection limits are in-
cluded for  each dosing  compound
and  for each sample type. Some of

-------
the samples  provided by this  study
have  already been  used  in  an  on-
going EMSL-LV program for analytical
method optimization.
  This Project Summary  was devel-
oped by ERA'S Environmental Monitor-
ing Systems  Laboratory,  Las Vegas,
NV, to announce key findings of the
research project that is  fully  docu-
mented in  a  separate report of  the
same title  (see  Project Report  order-
ing information at back).

Introduction
  Assessing current and potential prob-
lems at uncontrolled  hazardous  waste
sites  has  been  very  difficult  due to
several factors including (1) the  complex
chemical mixtures found at most sites
and (2) the  fact  that toxicity  and
environmental  transport data are  limited
for  many of the compounds present at
the site, especially for those that are by-
products of organic synthesis (rather  than
commercial  chemicals).  Similarly, when
samples of  urine,  blood, milk,  etc., are
collected and  analyzed in an attempt to
assess exposure  and  uptake, it is  very
difficult  to  determine the  accuracy of
these analyses due to  a lack of adequate
reference materials. Under conditions of
mammalian  exposure, many of  the
pollutants would be partially  metabolized
and several conjugation or  degradation
products would be present in a collected
sample. The currently available standards
are usually prepared by  adding  the
pollutant compound(s) to  an uncon-
taminated sample of biological tissues or
fluids. While this approach  provides  a
reference  compound in  the  correct
sample  matrix, it does  not include the
array  of associated compound degrada-
tion products,  many  of   which  can
interfere with an accurate analytical
determination  and some of which  may
have high toxicological significance.  Por-
tions  of  EPA programs in pesticides,
toxics,  and hazardous waste  have  a
defined  need for analytical reference and
quality assurance  materials.
  This study was conducted to determine
(confirm)  the retention and excretion
pattern of selected hazardous waste site
chemicals  and  to provide analytical
reference and quality assurance samples
that contain both  a representative  con-
centration of the  pollutant  compound(s)
and representative concentrations of the
associated  metabolic  degradation prod-
ucts.  Cattle were  used  as  experimental
animals throughout the study (1) because
of their  potential selection as a biological
monitoring  species for  chemical pollu-
tants  in agricultural areas, (2)  because
they provide major  food products  for
human consumption (i.e., milk and beef)
and,  perhaps  most importantly,  (3)
because  substantial quantities of mam-
malian tissue and body  fluid could  be
collected and prepared for  subsequent
use as reference materials. In each phase
of the project, cattle were given daily oral
doses  of compounds that are  of  regu-
latory interest to one or more of the EPA
program offices. Samples of urine, blood,
milk,  feces, and  sacrifice tissues  were
subsequently collected and  portions of
the respective  samples were  analyzed
using computer assisted gas chromatog-
raphy/ mass spectrometry. The selection
of chlorinated hydrocarbons,  emphasized
in phases I and II, was based on results
from a 1980 Love Canal (Niagara  Falls,
New York)  monitoring program and on a
preliminary  survey of toxic chemicals
frequently present in hazardous wastes.
  During the first part of this project,
some brief  method evaluation tests were
conducted to select the specific analytical
and sample preparation procedures that
would be used  during subsequent  study
phases. Another objective of the  initial
effort concerned the practicality of  using
certain metabolites to  indicate  previous
exposure  to chlorinated  hydrocarbons
and whether these metabolites could be
used  if an  animal had ingested  not only
chlorinated hydrocarbons  but  had also
ingested  small  amounts  of  many  other
waste site  chemicals.  Indicator  com-
pounds would include those compounds
and  metabolites that, when  detected in
urine, blood, etc.,  suggest previous  expo-
sure to chlorinated hydrocarbons.
  The second part of the  overall project
(and  the  phase  for  which there is a
continuing  EPA program office interest)
emphasized the collection and analysis of
blood, fat, and urine samples for ultimate
use  as analytical reference materials.
Substantial quantities of body fluid were
easily obtained from  the  dairy  animals.
Each animal was given daily oral doses
of selected pollutant  chemicals  so that
the tissues and  fluids,  would  contain
detectable  concentrations  of the dosing
compound(s) or associated major metab-
  ttes. Aliquots  of the respective  large
  nume samples  were chemically ana-
lyzed  and,  based on these initial ana-
lytical results, some of the samples were
then  selected  as potential reference
samples. Confirming  chemical  analyses
will ultimately be conducted before final
sample selections are made and before
any sample aliquots  are  distributed as
reference or quality assurance materials.
  The  reference samples,  with  ver
compound  concentrations,  can be
as performance evaluation samples v
selecting an  analytical  laboratory
among several candidates  or w
selecting the  best technique to use I
particular analysis.  However,  the r<
ence  materials  may  perhaps  b<
greatest benefit when used by lab
tories  to determine  analytical  accui
for samples of human urine, blood,
As mentioned previously, this is bec<
the standards, like the unknown samr.
will contain  pollutant compounds
associated  metabolites (all  in vivo in
porated) in  an appropriate  biolog
matrix.


Sample Collection
  Dosing groups for  the four  indivic
study phases are shown in Tables 1, 2
and  4, respectively. No dosing adji
ments  were made for individual variatii
in  animal  weight.  However,  individ
animal  weights were taken before dos
began  and at time of sacrifice. All anim
received  a commercial  feed preparat
and had continuous access  to water fr
individual automatic watering units.
  In  phase I,  dairy  cows  were on
dosed  with  a mixture of  chlorinal
hydrocarbons (2,4-dichlorophenol,  1
dichlorobenzene,  lindane,  1,2,3,4-tet
chlorobenzene, and  pentachlorophem
Selected  tissues  (e.g., liver,  kidnc
muscle, fat, and blood), milk,  urine, a
feces were analyzed for both  the pare
dosing compounds and for some of t
major metabolic conjugation/ degradati
products. During phase II, eight anim;
received various  combinations of tl
phase  I chlorinated hydrocarbons and
liquid  dose  that  had  originally  be<
collected from an actual hazardous was
site.  While the waste site liquid  was  n
toxic at the amounts administered, it d
contain a broad array  of organic cor
pounds. Large volume samples  of urii
were  retained for possible use  i
analytical references and, as in phase
all collected sample types were analyze
for the chlorinated hydrocarbon dosin
compounds and for some  of  the maj<
metabolic degradation products.
  Phase III and phase IV were  conducts
strictly to  provide  samples for  ultima!
use  as analytical  reference and qualil
assurance  materials  and,  in  some ir
stances,  to provide  sample material fc
use in  a continuing EMSL-LV program (
analytical method optimization.  The divei
sified  group  of phase III and phase  I'
dosing chemicals  included a  carbamalj
insecticide,  some  polycyclic aromati*

-------
Table 1.     Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Doses Administered to Phase I Dairy Cattle

                                           Dose Per Cow
       Dosing Groups
Daily dose per
   animal
Total dose for
  28 days
 mg/kg/day
(approximate)
 Two Animals (Group I)
 lindane

 Two Animals (Group II)
 lindane
 1,2 -dichlorobenzene
 2,4-dichlorophenol
 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene

 Two Animals (Group III)
 lindane
 1,2-dichlorobemene
 2,4-dichlorophenol
 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene
 pentachlorophenol
   4.0 grams       112 grams
   2.0 grams
  20.0 grams
  20.0 grams
   2.0 grams
   1.0 gram
  20.0 grams
  20.0 grams
   2.0 grams
   1.0 gram
   56 grams
  560 grams
  560 grams
   56 grams
   28 grams
  560 grams
  560 grams
   56 grams
   28 grams
                   6 mglkg
    3 mglkg
   29 mg/kg
   29 mg/kg
    2 mglkg
    2 mg/kg
   29 mg/kg
   29 mg/kg
    3 mg/kg
    2 mg/kg
Note:   Samples  from this phase have already been  used  as  part of the EMSL-LV
       program  for analytical  method optimization (Marsden, PJ.,  EN. Amick, F.L
       Shore, L.R. Williams, V.R. Bohman. and C.R. Blincoe.  1986. Characterization  of
       Bovine Urine and  Adipose  Interlaboratory  Performance  Evaluation Samples
       Containing Biologically Incorporated Chlorophenols. Journal of Agriculture and
       Food Chemistry. 34:795-800)
 hydrocarbons, an  ether,  a phthalate, an
 azobenzene  dye,  and an  amme.  Large
 volume samples  were again  collected
 from the  animals, but at  less frequent
 intervals  than in phase  I  and  II. In
 addition, less attention was given to the
 identification  of specific  metabolic prod-
 ucts  that resulted from  the respective
 dosing compounds  and,  since  the
 materials  of  primary interest  were urine,
 blood and carcass fat,  fewer  types of
 samples were collected.
   Throughout the  project, samples  were
 placed in  Teflon containers and stored at
 -23°C. Blood samples were collected by
 jugular  venipuncture  using a 14 gauge
 syringe needle which allowed the blood
 to drain directly into  the Teflon sample
 container. Portable machine milkers were
 routinely used during those  times when
 the  milk collection was  not  retained for
 chemical  analysis. When milk samples
 were collected for analysis,  the animals
 were milked by hand so that the milkwent
 directly  into the sample  collection
 container. Urine samples were typically
 taken before  dosing  began  and  for the
 first week of dosing.  In some instances,
 the  cows were  cathetenzed  within
 dwelling,  inflatable urinary catheters and
 the  urine would  drain  through  poly-
 ethylene  tubing into  Teflon  containers
 located at the rear of each  stall.  When
 tissue  samples  were  collected,  the
 animals were sacrificed  two days  after
 the last dose.
             Sample Analysis
               A continuing, though secondary, objec-
             tive of this  project was  to improve the
             applicability  of  currently available proce-
             dures for the more difficult sample types,
             i.e., those with  a significant lipid content
             such as  milk,  milk fat, carcass  fat, and
             liver. Some  of the extraction  steps  were
             modified primarily during the  second
             phase of the study, and additional proce-
             dural  revisions were  made  when  ana-
             lyzing for the  more diversified  group of
             chemicals present  in  the phase  III and
             phase IV samples.
               The  amount of  sample,  or  starting
             material,  used  during  an analysis was
             typically  200 grams for  urine and  milk:
             50 grams each for  liver,  muscle, kidney,
             and blood:   10 grams for fat:  and,  100
             grams  for feces and  animal  feed. The
             sample  analysis plan typically  included
             homogenization of  the sample  material,
             enzymatic hydrolysis,  solvent extraction,
             cleanup  and  concentration  of  solvent
             extracts,  extract derivatization, and instru-
             ment analysis. Samples of animal tissue,
             feed,  and  feces  were initially  hortSo-
             genized using  a tissue grinder.  With the
             exception of carcass fat and animal feed
             samples, the sample  material  was fre-
             quently  treated   with  a  commercial
             enzyme preparation to hydrolyze glucur-
             onide and  sulfate  conjugation products.
             The hydrolyzed samples were  then ex-
             tracted with  organic solvents at  high and
             low pH to partition the base- neutral and
acidic  compounds.  Extracts  were  then
concentrated  using  either a  Buchi
rotoevaporator  or a  Kuderna-Danish
apparatus.  The acid fraction was  then
derivatized to improve the stability of free
hydroxy  compounds (i.e.,  compounds
resulting  from the  derivatization  step).
The sample extracts were then analyzed
using  computer assisted gas chroma-
tography/mass  spectrometry.  The
approximate detection  limits  that  were
achieved during the study are shown in
Table 5 and a precision estimate, based
on the analysis of 10 aliquots of a single
urine collection, is shown in Table 6.
  The specific  analytical  and  sample
preparation steps that were  used during
each phase of the study are  included in
the project  report.  Dosing  compounds
and a  few  of the metabolite  compounds
(those  that were commercially available)
were added to some of  the  samples in
order  to allow  for a subsequent estimate
of compound recovery. The resulting
compound  recovery data are also  pro-
vided  in the project report.

Confirming Analysis
  This study has  provided  many  large
volume samples and aliquots oft  these
samples have received an initial analysis
Consequently,  some of the sampte*\ have
been  tentatively  selected  as potential
reference  material and  the  remaining
samples, collected as part of this overall
effort, have been discarded.  Carcass fat,
blood, and urine  represent the  pre-
dominant  number  of  sample  types
retained.
  The next step will be to assess the sta-
bility of compound  concentrations  under
typical storage conditions.  This  is ob-
viously a critical area and analyses will be
conducted  at  various intervals of  time
and, perhaps,  under different  storage
temperatures. Another series  of analyses
is planned to  assess the variability  in
compound concentration between ali-
quots  of the same sample. The samples
would not necessarily serve  as  a
reference material for each in vivo incor-
porated pollutant  compound  and/or as-
sociated metabolite  that might be present
m a given  sample,  but  rather would be
used for one or more of the  compounds
where  extensive confirmation analyses
have been conducted.  These  confirming
analyses are frequently  conducted by
more than one analytical technique.

Conclusions
  None of the study phases was  con-
ducted  as  typical  metabolism experi-

-------
Table 2.    Phase II Cattle that Received Doses of an Actual Hazardous Waste  Site
           Liquid as well as the Previously Administered Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
                                     Liquid Material from Hazardous Waste Site"
   Number of         Chlorinated      	
     Animals      Hydrocarbon Dose"     Dose/Animal/Day     Total DoselAnimal
2
2
2
2
2
tratment A 80 ml
treatment A 160 ml
1/2 tratment A 160ml
80 ml

1120ml~"
2240 mr~
2240 ml"
2240 ml~"

   "Chlorinated hydrocarbon dose  (treatment A) composed  of  lindane  -  1  gram/
    animal/day; i,2-dichlorobenzene  - 20  grams/animal/day; 2,4-dichlorophenol  -  20
    grams/animal/day; 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene - 2 grams/animalldays and pentachlo-
    rophenol - 1 gram/ animal/day.
  "Waste  site material  contained  many  semivolatile organics  at mgli  to  figli
   concentrations, i.e.,  benzaldehyde; benzoic  acid;  pentachlorophenol;  9,10-
   anthracenedione; flouranthene;  pyrene; p-phenylcarbamlic  acid: 1 -methoxy-1 -
   methyl9thO>v-2-propanol; 4-methoxy 2,2,6-trimethyl cyclohexanone;  4-hydroxy-3-
   methoxy-benitldehyde; phenanthrene; anthracene; carbazole;  biphenylene;  4-
   methylphonol; 2-butoxyethanol; flourene;  1,2-benzenedicarboxylic  acid,  1-
   ethoxytwt*n»;  trans-2-ohlorocyclohexanol; phenoxyacetic acid: 4-hydroxybenzene
   ac«*c  acid; mtthylcycloheptane; 5-methyl-l,2-haxadiene; 3-ethyl-i,4-hexadiene:
   pftarMntfiridtorm: phenol: 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol; 2-methylanthracene; dibenzofuran;
   and  M-acHytfwnzamide. Numerous  inorganics (mg/1  concentrations)  were also
   present i.9, aluminum • 420; cadmium •  14; calcium - 200; chromium - 440; cobalt -
    t30f copper - 710; iron - 470; lead - 3; magnesium - 690; manganese - 38; molyb-
   d9jtum - 21; nickel -130; thallium - 20; and zinc - 48.
              by rumen catheter (material given last 14 consecutive days. i.e.. day 14-

              by rumen catheter (material given for 28 consecutive days)
ments  where all major  metabolic degra-
dation  products are identified  and their
retention and  excretion quantitated.
However, various  data  summaries are
included in the project report that present
individual compound concentrations  for
each animal and for each tissue or body
fluid. Some progress was also made with
the analysis of  milk fat and  carcass fat
samples where  most of  the  initial
analytical difficulty was encountered. The
analytical procedures are also thoroughly
addressed in the project report.
  Mammalian  patterns of chlorinated hy-
drocarbon metabolism suggested that the
five compounds administered in phases I
and  II, would  yield several  degradation
products, e.g.,  3,4-dichlorophenol;  2,3-
dichlorophenol; 2,4-dichlorophenol; 2,3,5-
trichlorophenol; 2,4,5-trichlorophenol;
2,3,4.6-tetrachlorophenol;  2,3,4,5-tetra-
chlorophenol;  2,4-dichlorophenylmer-
capturic  acid;  3,4-dichlorophenylmerc-
aptunc  acid;  pentachlorooyclohexanol;
3,4-dichlorocatechol; 4,5-dichlorocate-
chol; and  tetrachlorohydroquinone.
Several  of these compounds were in fact
noted in  the  urine samples  collected
during this study. If animals were used as
biological  monitors for these  waste site
chemicals,  the  most  likely  indicator
compounds (i.e., compounds that indicate
previous exposure to a  given group of
chemicals)  would probably  be  the
presence of various phenols in the urine
and long-half-life  lipophilic compounds in
the carcass fat.
  The specific samples collected  during
this   project  may, or  may not,  be
distributed as  actual reference materials
depending upon  user  needs.  However,
the  analytical   procedures  and  the
Sequence of confirming analyses  (neces-
sary  for sample  verification)  have been
established  or  improved during the
various  phases  of this  project. Large
volume samples with in vivo incorporate
toxicants can be  provided in subseque
efforts if additional material is  needed f
actual distribution. The reference ar
quality assurance samples are  intends
for use as performance evaluation mate
ials for use  in  selecting an analytic
laboratory from  among several  cand
dates  or when selecting the  best tecl
nique to use for a particular analysis. Th
EMSL-LV has already used the  carcaj
fat and urine  samples in  its  ongom
analytical  method development  an
optimization program.  Many laboratorie
routinely analyze  human  urine  sample
and the use of these  reference material
should improve the accuracy of  thes
determinations. Difficulties  in  obtamin
"safe" human  blood  in bulk quantities
and in finding laboratories willing to wor
with it, provides additional interest in th<
use of bovine  blood  for method am
laboratory performance evaluations.

-------
'able 3.    Dosing Regime and Sample Collection Schedule for Phase III Cattle

                                       Hereford Heifers         Adult Holstein Cows

Compound
Daily dose
per animal
(grams)
Total dose
per aminal
(grams)
Daily Dose
per animal
(grams)
Total dose
per aminal
(grams)
3retreatment
Week 1



Veeki



Veek 1




Veek 1








hexachlorobenzene
yellow dye no. 3
dioctyl phthalate
ethoxyethyl acetate
hexachlorobenzene
yellow dye no. 3
dioctyl phthalate
polychlorinated btphenyls
hexachlorobenzene
yellow dye no. 3
dioctyl phthalate
methylene dianiline
polybrommated biphenyls
hexachlorobenzene
yellow dye no. 3
dioctyl phthalate
ethoxyethyl acetate
polychlorinated biphenyls
methylene dianiline
polybrommated biphenyls
carbaryl
pentachlorophenol
2.5
25
5.0
10.0
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
2.5
2.5
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
10.0


2.5
2.5
25
05
(see
final
total
below)









70
70
175
40
40
35
33
18
4
5
5
10
20
5
5
10
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
20


5
5
5
1
(see
final
total
below)









140
140
350
80
80
70
65
35
7
Samples Collected
Urine Milk Blood
XXX



XXX



XXX




X







XXX

 'ofe: Ethoxyethyl acetate doses  were discontinued  after 4 days because  of apparent  toxicity. The  PCS doses  were
     administered until the supply of the PCS aroclor was exhausted (8 days).  The PBB doses were not administered on
     the first day of week 4 due to a shortage of the PBB mixture.
 able 4.    Compounds Given to Phase IV Dairy Cattle.

 Number of Animals            Compunds              Dose, Animal/Day
Total Dose/Animal
one
one
one
one
2-chlorodiphenyl ether
hexachlorobenzene
perylene
polychloronaphthalene no. 1099
i , 3,5-trichlorobenzene
diethylhexyl adipate
polychloronaphthalene no. 1014
n -dioctyl pthalate
fluorene
fluoranthene
arochlor 1260 (PCB)
tnphenyl phosphate
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
1 gram
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams
21 grams •
21 grams
21 grams
Vo(ep Solids were  administered  orally  in gelatin capsules  and  liquids  (diethylhexyl adipate,  2-
     chlorodiphenylether,  and dioctyl  pthalate) were infused through a rumen catheter. Blood
     serum, urine, carcass fat, and liver samples were collected from  the animals for ultimate use
     as analytical reference materials.

-------
Table 5.      Estimate of Analytical Detection Limits Achieved During the Current Study when Analyzing the Various
             Types of Sample Material (Best Estimate Values Presented as uglg of Sample Material)

                                                          Detection Limits (uglg)
                                                 Achieved Using Different Sample Materials
Compound
tetrachlorobenzene
carbaryl
methylene dianiline
dichlorophenols
trichlorophenols
tetrachlorobenzene
dioctyl phthalate
lindane
yellow dye no. 3
polychlorinated biphenyls
polybrommated biphenyls
ethoxyethyl acetate
pentachlorophenol
dich/orobenzne
hexachlorobenzene
Blood
Serum
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.5
Milk
0.01
NO
ND
0.01
0.01
0.01
ND
0.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
0.01
ND
Milk Fat
ND
0.05
0.5
ND
ND
ND
0.1
ND
1.0
0.02
0.05
ND
0.2
ND
0.01
Urine
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.01
Feces
0.01
ND
ND
0.01
0.03
0.01
ND
0.05
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
0.01
ND
Liver
0.01
0.1
ND
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.20
0.03
1.0
0.5
0.5
ND
1.0
0.01
0.1
Kidney
0.01
No
ND
0.01
0.02
0.01
ND
0.03
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03
0.01
ND
Carcass
Fat
0.03
0.1
ND
0.03
0.1
0.03
02
0.01
1.0
0.5
0.5
ND
1.0
0.03
1.0
Note:  Varying amounts of analytical interference were typically encountered from sample to sample and the above
      values are presented as an approximation of the detection limits actually achieved when analyzing the different
      types of sample material. Carcass fat, milk, and milk fat were probably the most difficult of the samples to
      analyze. The notation ND (not determined) means that a detection limit estimate was not achieved when using
      the indicated sample material.
Table  6.     Determination of Analytical Precision Based on Analysis  of  10 Separate Aliquots of a
             Single  Urine  Sample. (Precision Expressed as Coefficient of Variation for 11 in vivo
             Incorporated Compounds Present in the Urine.)
Compound
tetrachlorobenzene
tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-trichlorophenol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
3,4-dichlorophenol
2,3- and 2,4-dichlorophenol
lindane
phenol
methyl phenol
tetrachlorohydroqumone
pentachlorophenol
Number of
Determinations
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Mean
Concentration
(pg'g)
0.05
27.78
5.74
0.13
7.07
8.27
0.19
3.39
7.65
2.42
42.70
Coefficient of
Variation (%)
40
35
38
15
44
33
37
44
56
44
35
Note: Ten aliquots of a single urine sample were taken and sequentially analyzed. Sample preparation
      steps, GC/MS analysis, and routine quality control steps were conducted for each aliquot.

-------

-------
    V. R. Bohman, C. R. Blincoe, G. C. Miller, and  R. L. Scholl are with the University
     of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557; the EPA authors,  W. W. Sutton (also the EPA Project
     Officer, see below)  and L R. Williams, are  with the Environmental Monitoring
     Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, NV 89193-3478.
    The complete report, entitled "Biological Monitoring Systems for Hazardous Waste
     Sites (Production and Analysis of Analytical Reference Materials)," (Order No. PB
     89-t*9204/AS; Cost: $21.95,  subject to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
    The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Las Vegas, NV 89193-3478
    United States
    Environmental Protection
    Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
I   	
'    Official Business
,    Penalty for Private Use $300

    EPA/600/S4-89/007
            CC0085833   PS
                                             'SE'CI

-------