United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                    Research and Development
EPA-600/S7-83-006  March 1983
&EPA         Project Summary

                    Survey and Analysis of
                    Current  European
                    Technologies for
                    Wood  Combustion
                    Werner Martin and Daniel R. Koenigshofer
                      This report summarizes current Euro-
                    pean technologies and air pollution
                    policies pertaining to wood combustion.
                    Twenty concepts  for  wood burning
                    equipment are described. Also included
                    are section diagrams, size ranges, and
                    comments regarding efficiency and
                    convenience. Many of the system types
                    are not currently available on the U.S.
                    market. A list of  manufacturers and
                    their addresses is included. The report
                    also contains emission data for many of
                    the systems described. European emis-
                    sion regulations and test procedures are
                    presented. Finally, a brief overview of
                    health research related to suspected
                    carcinogenic materials  in wood com-
                    bustion emissions is presented. This
                    information was gathered both in the
                    U.S. and in Europe by engineers familiar
                    with wood combustion on both conti-
                    nents. The work was funded by EPA's
                    Industrial Environmental Research Lab-
                    oratory to supplement  their other ac-
                    tivities relating to air  pollution from
                    wood combustion.
                      This Project Summary was developed
                    by EPA's Industrial Environmental Re-
                    search Laboratory, Research Triangle
                    Park. NC, to announce key findings of
                    the research project that is fully docu-
                    mented in a separate report of the same
                    title (see Project Report ordering infor-
                    mation at back).

                    Introduction

                      Unlike in the U.S., use of wood as a fuel
                    has not dramatically increased in recent
                    years in Europe. Rather, it has always
been an important fuel for certain appli-
cations. This long history combined with
the relative scarcity of wood has resulted
in a wide variety of efficient wood burning
equipment on the European market. Some
of the systems are not presently available
in the U.S.
  This report examines 20 wood firing
systems. Their operation is described and
displayed graphically. Typical  manufac-
turers are listed and comments are made
regarding their efficiency, ease of opera-
tion, and applications. Pollutant emission
data are presented for all system types.
Finally, specific regulations and support-
ing health research are discussed briefly.
  Trends in European fuel wood use for
the most part are a continuation of
previous applications. Only in Sweden is
there strong encouragement for increased
wood combustion. This is manifest in the
recent construction of several wood-fired
district heating plants  in Sweden. Else-
where wood continues to be an important
fuel in rural areas where it is often burned
with coal. Wood related industries (such
as cabinet shops, furniture, and pulp and
paper) are the prime consumers of waste
wood. They,  too,  often supplement the
wood with coal. Another interesting trend
is found in urban/suburban areas where
multi-fuel boilers have become popular.
The unique aspect of this is that wood is
seen  as an auxiliary, emergency fuel to
back up oil or gas.
  In the residential and small commercial
market, down- and cross-draft units have
displaced up-drafters. Thermal storage in
masonry or water has also become rela-
tively common. Industrial wood combus-

-------
tion  equipment appears to be moving
toward cyclone burners and fluidized-bed
combustors. Several companies  have
gasifiers in  the  pilot stage. The  main
emphasis appears to be to use the gas to
fire internal combustion engines, often to
generate electricity.
  Emission regulations tend to be simple
and  not particularly  stringent.  Great
emphasis is placed on  enforcement.
Probably the most remarkable aspect of
the pollution control strategies is the
requirement of regular inspection and
maintenance by licensed chimney sweeps
and  other technicians. This policy has
resulted not only in decreased emissions,
but also in improved efficiency and safety.
Boilers  must be  inspected and tested
annually. Those failing must undergo the
required adjustments to be certified.
Through the  inspection/maintenance
program the user gains an understanding
of the equipment and its proper operation.
This may be as valuable as the adjust-
ments.
  As in the U.S., equipment manufac-
turers strenuously oppose emission stan-
dards. Their main contention is that to
meet any standard the equipment must
be designed for a very specific type of fuel
when in fact  the consumer demands
versatility.  In Switzerland  and  West
Germany, multi-fuel  boilers have outsold
single-fuel gas or oil boilers for the past 5
years. This flexibility in fuel types usually
results in a decrease in overall efficiency.
  Since wood  is  relatively scarce,  Euro-
pean officials do not appear particularly
concerned about  emissions from  wood
combustion.  With  the  exception of
Sweden, research on health effects of
Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) and Poly-
cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) has
been aimed at auto and industrial  emis-
sions and occupational exposure rather
than at  wood  combustion. Sweden has
done some research specifically on PAH
emissions from wood heaters.  Unfortu-
nately, the results were inconclusive.

Air Pollution Considerations

  Most  standards applicable to  wood
combustion derive from early European
concern about particulate emissions from
coal combustion. Since  many  types of
coals were used, categorization was
necessary to accommodate their different
emission characteristics. Percent volatile
matter became an accepted distinguish-
ing feature. Wood then was included with
other high  volatile fuel such as brown
coal briquets. Since smoke output is
generally proportional to volatile matter
content, wood and  other  high volatile
fuels became known as "smokey fuels."
Eventually  regulations  and equipment
design reflected this distinction between
"smokey" and "smokeless" fuels.
  The authors reported that down-draft-
ers produced significantly less pollution
than up-drafters. This early knowledge
was the basis for German regulations for
small stoves, and resulted in the universal
application  of the "slow combustion" or
Dauerbrenner stove.
  Since emissions from wood combus-
tion have  not been of  great national
concern in any of the European countries,
regulations relating to wood are a part of
those pertaining to particulate emissions
from coal. As in the U.S., in recent years
there has been increasing concern about
emissions from residential appliances.
Visibility problems   have  been  docu-
mented in alpine valleys which are sub-
ject to frequent  inversions.  To date,
however, these problems  have  not re-
sulted in any regulatory action.  There has
also been increasing concern  about the
effects of  PAH emissions from wood
combustion as reflected by recent con-
ferences and health research.
  In Germany combustion emissions are
regulated by the Federal Air and Noise
Protection Law of 1974. Switzerland  is
still awaiting passage of its federal en-
vironmental protection law so  emissions
are controlled by guidelines established
by insurance companies and professional
organizations (e.g..engineering societies).
Some local governments  have  passed
ordinances but enforcement is possible
only through nuisance complaints.
  In Sweden only large equipment (>900
MJ/h) is regulated by the federal En-
vironmental Protection Act. The National
Environmental  Protection  Board can,
however, recommend standards or regu-
lations for any pollution source.


Reported Emissions

  Most of  the emission data found  in
Europe  are produced  by government
agencies who are responsible for testing
and certifying equipment. Most of this is
done  using VDI (Association of German
Engineers) standards. References may be
found in  Appendix E of the full report.
Manufacturers are required to test their
own equipment and verify that it meets
the regulations.
  Table 1 summarizes available emission
data.
Residential and
Commercial

  Two fireplaces were tested by Rudling
and Ahling (1). Braskamin I was a fire-
place without a warm air heat exchanger,
but with a glass door and outdoor com-
bustion  air.  Braskamin II had a built-in
warm air heat exchanger. Pollutant con-
centrations in the stack gases of the two
fireplaces were very similar. The higher
thermal efficiency of the Braskamin II,
however, resulted in  loweremission rates
per unit of  heat output (mg/MJ  out).
Emission rates from Braskamin II were
about half those from I. Note that in both
cases the reported efficiency was much
higher than commonly reported  in the
U.S. literature.
  All of  the residential boilers described
in the full report  had to meet the West
German TSP standard. Capacities and
efficiencies were based on information
from the manufacturers; therefore, no
specific  data was available. All that is
known is that the standard was met.
  A detailed emission analysis of two
types of residential boilers  was also
performed by Rudling. Emissions from a
prechamber boiler were compared with
those from a standard-grate-fired boiler.
Both of them were fired with wood chips,
controlling for firing rate, moisture con-
tent,  and excess air.  Tables  2  and 3
contain  the significant data from that
study.
   In the standard-grate residential boiler
the only factor influencing TSP and POM
was the excess air level. The highest CO
value was  accompanied by  extremely
high PAH values. The moisture content of
the wood and the firing rate appeared to
have little  influence  on the  pollutant
concentrations.
   The prechamber system was composed
of the standard-grate-fired boiler used in
the first system,  but with a gravity fed
prechamber. It was  difficult  to  draw
conclusions from the  data presented in
Table 2, since too many variables changed
from one test  to the  next. Again, the
excess  air level, as  indicated by the COz
concentration,  seemed to be  the most
important variable  associated with the
changes in TSP and PAH concentrations.
In Test 4 the excess air seemed to be too
high to maintain adequate combustion
temperatures at  the  given  firing rate.
Rudling concluded  that increased firing
rates would produce higher TSP and POM
emissions and that higher moisture con-
tent would  result in higher PAH emis-
sions.

-------
Table 1. Summary of Emissi
Equipment Type
Residential
Fireplaces
Braskamin 1
Braskamin II
Tile Stoves

Boilers
Multifuel (1 Firebox)

Multifuel (2 Fireboxes)
Solid Fuel
Solid Fuel w/DHW tank

Pre-Chamber (for Logs)
Pre-Chamber (for Chips)
Commercial
Boilers
Handfired/Susp. Comb.
Pre-Chamber, Handfired
Moving Grate (Chips)
Industrial
Boilers
Retort, Stoker
Cyclone Burner
FluidizedBed
Inclined Moving Grate
Handfired/Susp. Comb.
Dutch Oven Type
Gasifiers


ion Data of Wood-Fi
Output
Capacity
MJ/h


21.5
43.0
2.6-6.3


61-600

61-600
60-1420
60-146

125-2000
125


277-2-103
250-3-1 03
1.4-6-103


3-5-103
1-50-103
1-50-103
16-103

2.6-16.2-103
3-1 03


ired Equipmt
Efficiency
%


40-45
70-80
75-85


65-85

70-85
70-85
50-85

70-85
80-85


70-80
75-85
75-85


75-84
84-88







>nt in Europe (fc
Manufac-
turers







1.2

1.2
1.2
1

3
14


4.5.6
15
6


7.8
9.10
16
6.11
6
6
11.12.13


>r manufacturers, see Appendix D of full report)
Average Emissions
(ug/J)
TSP


5.7-170
16-78



<79*

<79*
<79*
<79*

<79*
45-7600


<156*
< 79*
<756*


794
26-77
2.0
28
77-155
103-252



POMs Others Remarks
W/J


0.3-17 CO:0.6-7.3 (5)
0.3-7 CO:1. 1-0.8 (5)
Capacity in
MJ/m2h{6)

lower efficiency
for oil


lower efficiency
summer

0.004-8.3 CO:0.06-5 (5)







w/ multi-cyclones (4)
0.001 w/elec. precip. (7)
w/baghouse (10)
fired w/wet bark (8)
(4)
(4)
CO/7. 26 pollutants measured
Ald.:0. 76 in exhaust gas of/C-
engine (9)
*Standard of West Germany.

  It was difficult to compare emissions
from the two systems since moisture
content and firing rates were not well
controlled.  At design capacity (7 kg/h)
TSP  concentrations in the prechamber
system were reported to be lower by a
factor of 1.5 to 5. PAH  concentrations
were also reported to be much lower in
the prechamber configuration.

Industrial

  There is  a wide variety of industrial
combustion equipment. Retort under-fed
stokers  are very common  in the lower
capacity ranges. They reach efficiencies
up to 85% and can handle dry and green
chips.  TSP  emission  is  not  excellent
because the forced combustion air carries
all the ash through the boiler. Manufac-
turers claim, however, that the particulate
matter passing through the multi-cyclone
is exclusively light fly ash.
  Tests of a Swedish cyclone burner
revealed very low TSP and POM emis-
sions (4). The burner is part of a district
heating system  in southern  Sweden
(Vaxjo) and burns a mixture of wet bark
and green chips. The cyclone burner
exhausts to a normal oil-fired boiler. The
system is equipped with an electrostatic
precipitator.
  Afluidized-bed plant has been tested in
Eksjo, Sweden (5). The plant is equipped
with a baghouse and fires wet bark and
green chips and, for a few hours every
day, municipal solid waste. This multi-
fuel approach with fluidized-bed combus-
tors has created great interest in Sweden.
The Swedish National Board of Environ-
mental Protection conducted an emission
test  on  that particular unit and found
average TSP concentrations as low as 5
mg/m3, or approximately 2 mg/MJ.
  Inclined moving grate boilers are often
found in pulp and paper mills where wet
bark and even  waste water treatment
plant sludge is burned. One particular

-------
Table 2.   Emissions from a Standard-Grate-Fired Wood Chip Boiler
       Parameter
                                Units
                                                Test 1
                                                          Test 2
                            Test 3
Firing Rate
Moisture Content of Wood
Stack Gas Temperature
CO2
CO
H,Cy
TSP
PAH
kg/h
%
°C
%
ppm
ppm
mg/m3 (at 1O%COd
tig/ m3 (at 10% COd
7.0
14
200
8.0
8,000
NA
360
16.000
7.0
14
200
5.7
6,000
NA
120
25,000
13.0
36
190
5.0
6,500
NA
260
2,800
Table 3.   Emissions from a Prechamber Wood Chip Boiler
        Parameter
                                Units
                                               Test 1   Test 2   Test 3   Test 4
Firing Rate
Moisture Content of Wood
Stack Gas Temperature
COa
CO
r/xCy
TSP
PAH
kg/h
%
°C
%
ppm
ppm
mg/m3(at 1O%COd
Iig/m3(at 10% CO,)
4.2
21
150
6.5
60
30
72
<6.8
7.0
48
190
6.7
700
50
72
42
7.0
48
190
7.0
2.100
110
80
220
7.0
48
180
4.0
2,500
400
2,300
2,300
boiler of this type has been tested for
particulate matter (6). Average TSP emis-
sion was found to be only 28 mg/MJ
using simple mechanical filters.
  The Swiss  Federal Materials Testing
and Research Institute (3) has done an
emission field survey among typical wood
fired industrial  boilers in Switzerland.
Dutch-oven, suspension burner, and stok-
er retort boilers were the most prevalent.
The investigators suggested that a na-
tionwide TSP emission standard of about
85 mg/MJ  could be justified since more
than half of the tested installations met
such emission levels. In some cases 85
mg/MJ can  be  reached  using only  a
settling chamber.

Combustion Technologies
  The combustion equipment presented
here is divided  into  three categories:
Residential Space Heating,  Commercial
Applications, and Industrial Applications.
The  equipment described represents a
good cross-section of the technologies
available on the European  market. For
each piece of equipment, a brief explana-
tion of its specific use and a description of
the equipment is followed by a list of its
special features  and their influence on
efficiency, emissions, and convenience.
Residential Equipment

  Unlike in the U.S., free-standing metal
wood stoves are not extremely popular.
Instead, wood is usually burned in one of
four types of appliances: a masonry/tile
stove, a combination cookstove and boil-
er, a multi-fuel boiler, and, in some cases,
fairly efficient fireplaces.
  Since most of the forests are owned by
local government, wood is normally gath-
ered and prepared by the user rather than
by commercial wood dealers. Towns issue
permits to cut trees  which have been
marked by the town forester. This results
in professionally managed forests which
produce far  greater  yields than most
privately  owned forests in the U.S. In
Switzerland, a law requires planting new
trees  on  a one-for-one basis even  on
private land.  A permit is required to clear
cut anywhere. This concern for preserva-
tion is also manifest in the wood burning
equipment commonly found in Europe.

Commercial Equipment

  Wood working shops  have created a
demand for wood residue burners. These
are used to  burn sanderdust, sawdust,
shavings, and all sizes  of scrap wood.
Space heating,  wood  dryers, and hot
water needs are the most common end
uses.  The great variation of fuel  size
created in these shops has resulted  in
rather  complex combustion  equipment
design. Shavings, sawdust, and sander-
dust are burned in suspension, whereas
larger pieces of wood are fed manually
and burned on a grate.

Industrial Equipment

  The larger combustion installations are
located either in  industrial  or utility
plants, including district heating plants.
Wood fired boilers are most often found in
the pulp and paper and in  the wood
working industry. A more recent applica-
tion of wood  fueled boilers is in district
heating or public cogeneration plants,
where wood waste is available.
  There are only a few major manufactur-
ers of industrial-size wood-fired boilers in
Germany, Switzerland, and Scandinavia.
There, specialization  in  wood  and/or
other  solid  fuel  fired equipment  has
brought them international recognition.

References

 1.  Rudling,  L. and B. Ahling. Chemical
    and  Biological  Characterization  of
    Emissions from Combustion of Wood
    and Wood Chips in Small Furnaces
    and Stoves; for the National Swedish
    Environmental Protection Board  by
    University of Stockholm, September
    1980.
 2.  Swiss Firewood Commission. "Tile
    Stove Central  Heating  Systems."
    Advisory Office for Wood Combus-
    tion, SVW, Solothurn, Switzerland.
 3.  Swiss  Federal  Office for Environ-
    mental Protection. "Suspended Par-
    ticulate Matter Emissions from Auto-
    matically  Fed Installations Burning
    Wood Waste." Measurements done
    by  Federal  Material  Testing  and
    Research  Laboratory (EMPA),
    Dubendorf, Switzerland,  November
    1975.
 4.  National Swedish Environmental Pro-
    tection Board. Measurement Proto-
    col of Emission Test  at Vaexjoe
    District Heating Plant, unpublished,
    1980.
 5.  National Swedish Environmental Pro-
    tection Board. Measutement Proto-
    col of Emission Test at Eksjoe  Flui-
    dized Bed Plant, unpublished, 1980.
 6.  Papermill Utzensdorf. Measurement
    Protocol for Lambion Bark-Fired Boil-
    er. Association for Enhancement of
    Water and  Air  Pollution Control,
    Zurich, Switzerland, May 1979.

-------
7.   TUV Baveria.  "Emission Measure-
    ments on  a Gasifier Using Wood
    Waste and Fueling a  Gas Engine."
    DI-WUL 30-stra-ru 116 4317, Tech-
    nischer Uberwachnugsverein Bayern
    e.V., 8000  Munchen  40, West
    Germany.
  Werner Martin and Daniel R. Koenigshofer are with Integrated Energy Systems,
   Inc., Chapel Hill, NC27514.
  Michael Osborne is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  The complete report,  entitled  "Survey and Analysis  of  Current  European
   Technologies for Wood  Combustion," (Order No.  PB 83-156 729;  Cost:
   $11.50, subject to change) will be available only from:
         National Technical Information Service
         5285 Port Royal Road
         Springfield, VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
         Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                                            •fr U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983/659 -095/1904

-------

-------
United States                     Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection             Information                                               Environmental
Agency                         Cincinnati OH 45268                                        Protectlolf
                                                                                    Agency
                                                                                    EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
                                  PS   0000329
                                  US  ENVIR  PROTECTION AGENCY
                                  REGION  5 LIBRARY
                                  230  3 DEARBORN  STREET
                                  CHICAGO IL 60604

-------