United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
 Industrial Environmental Research
 Laboratory
 Cincinnati OH 45268
                    Research and Development
 EPA-600/S7-83-008  Apr. 1983
<&EPA         Project  Summary
                    An Assessment  of the  Effects  of
                    Active Solar Thermal
                    Technologies  on  Urban
                    Emissions
                    Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
                     This study analyzes the fuel displace-
                    ment potential of solar technologies to
                    determine the benefits of emission
                    reduction which might result in urban
                    areas from use of solar energy.  Fuel
                    displacement by  solar energy was
                    found to be greatest in the residential
                    water-heating and in electric end-uses
                    in all three cities investigated (Hous-
                    ton, Chicago, and Philadelphia).  Fuel
                    displacement increased from 1985 to
                    1995, as solar energy  became more
                    competitive with other fuels. However,
                    emissions reductions attributable to
                    the expanding market for solar energy
                    were relatively small in all three urban
                    areas, generally less than one percent
                     This Project Summary was developed
                    by EPA's Industrial Environmental Re-
                    search Laboratory. Cincinnati. Ohio, to
                    announce key findings of the research
                    project that is fully documented in a
                    separate report of the same title (see
                    Project Report ordering information at
                    back).

                    Introduction
                     Solar energy systems can have a posi-
                    tive impact on air quality by displacement
                    of fossil-fired energy conversion sources.
                    The objective of this study was to analyze
                    the fuel  displacement potential of solar
                    systems and to determine the associated
                    emissions reductions in metropolitan areas.
                    The  study considered emissions reduc-
                    tions of particulates, sulfur  oxides, nitro-
                    gen  oxides, hydrocarbons, and carbon
                    monoxide resulting from fossil fuel dis-
                    placemnt by solar energy. Three metro-
                    politan Air Quality Control Regions (Chicago,
 Houston, Philadelphia) were analyzed for
 two future points in time:  1985  and
 1995. Analysis of solar technologies was
 limited to active  solar thermal systems
 because of their commercial readiness
 and their widespread applicability to urban
 energy markets.
  The study was divided into five sequen-
 tial tasks:  market  definition, technical
 assessment of solar systems, economic
 analysis, sensitivity tests, and emissions
 impacts. Fuel use which could be poten-
 tially displaced by solar systems was ident-
 ified and disaggregated into market seg-
 ments, consisting of a matrix of end-uses
 and fuel types (e.g., one market segment
 would be gas-fired space heating in single-
 family detached residences).  These mar-
 ket segments reflect both technical factors
 (e.g., process temperatures) and economic
 factors (e.g.,  ownership status), which
 affect solar competitiveness. The  end-
 uses   considered  in  the  residential,
 commercial, and public sectors included
 space heating and  cooling,  and water
 heating. These market segments account
 fora large portion of energy consumption
 in all these  sectors.  In the industrial
 sector, market segments were restricted
 to space heating and process heat at less
 than 816°C(1500°F).
  Atechnical assessment helped to define
 viable  solar systems for each end-use
 market segment and to identify perform-
 ance factors affecting end-use solar ener-
 gy utilization.  For example, collector land
 use is expected to limit the size of solar
 systems in a number of situations. Tech-
 nically viable  solar systems  were com-
pared with conventional systems on the

-------
basis of a life-cycle cost analysis. When
the ratio of levelized price of displaced
fossil fuel to annualized solar cost of an
end-use exceeded one, the solar system
was considered competitive in that market
segment.  When a solar system was com-
petitive, the entire amount of energy con-
sumed by the particular market segment,
adjusted by a solar load factor, was con-
sidered displaced.
  A sensitivity analysis was conducted to
determine how  fuel displacement would
be affected by different economic assump-
tions  and to establish a fuel displacement
range. Six scenarios were constructed by
pairing three solar  cost estimates  (low,
medium,  and high) with two fuel-price
projections (mid-range and high).  Two
scenarios received particularattention:  a
"base-case" scenario (medium solar costs
and mid-range fuel price projections) that
was considered the most  likely reflection
of future  market conditions, and a "best-
case" scenario (low solar  costs and high
fuel  prices)  that was considered  most
favorable  for solar penetration  of the
market place.

Findings

Fuel  Displacement
  Under the base-case scenario, fuel dis-
placement in the residential, commercial,
and public sectors resulted primarily from
the capture of part of the oil and electric
hot water heating markets in 1985.  Dis-
placement increased substantially in 1995
with the capture of certian space-heating
market segments (see Figure 1).  More
fuel displacement occurred in the residen-
tial  sector  than in  the commercial and
public sectors,   due to the  size of  the
residential water and space heating mar-
kets and the competitiveness of residential
solar systems. The fraction of total com-
mercial and residential energy consump-
tion displaced in 1 985 was  1.43, 0.70,
and 1.79  percent for Houston, Chicago,
and Philadelphia, respectively.  Fuel dis-
placement was  less than five percent of
the total consumption for these sectors in
1995, for each  AQCR investigated.
  Industrial  fuel  displacement was  not
significant in the base-case scenario; in-
dustrial solar systems were not competi-
tive with any fuel type in  1985 and only
marginally attractive in 1 995.  The rela-
tively low fuel displacement levels in both
years are attributable to:  1) land restric-
tions  which limit solar system size and
output, 2) industrial coal use, 3) low solar
load fractions, and 4) limited low-process-
temperature applications  where  solar is
competitive.
32-

30-

28-
26-

24-
« 22-
-S
'I 20-
•S 18-
iK.
qj
,c 16-
Uj
Q)
c\
| 14-
.&
Q
72-

70-
8-

6-
4-
2-












31.2
(29.6)




Note: One petajoule equals 0.948 trillion Btu.

1985 V]
1995^














7.0
(6.6)

4.0
(3.8)


20.9
(19.8)
mm
\
\
m
I
•
m
I
m
I
m
I
9.1 n
(8.em



3.8
(3.6)
^
A
/
/
/
/
/
/


\


14.4
(13.6)









0






6.8 5.5
(6.5) ,5.2) 57
n (5.4)
J
iL

























- 34


-28


-24


-20 Sj
0
S5
.c
j^
-16 fe
^,
l*j
8
•2
.§•
-72 Q



- 5

.
- 4
Electricity Fuel Gas Electricity Fuel Gas Electricity Fuel Gas
oil
Houston
oil
oil
Philadelphia Chicago
Figure 1.    Displaced energy in residential, commercial, and public sectors by air quality control
           regions — base-case economic and fuel-escalation scenario.
  In the sensitivity tests, fuel displace-
ment increased substantially in all three
Air Quality Control Regions (AQCR) under
the more favorable solar scenarios.  Gas
displacement in the residential, commer-
cial and public sectors was most noticeable,
because  in 1985, under the base-case
scenario, no  gas was displaced.   The
fraction of total commercial and residential
energy consumption accounted for in the
1985 best-case scenario was 3.2 percent,
5.9 percent, and 6.3 percent for Houston,
Chicago,  and  Philadelphia,  respectively.
Industrial fuel displacement was  also
larger  under  the more favorable solar
scenarios.  In these cases, solar became
competitive with gas and oil space  heat
systems, process heat, and some steam
applications.  However, best-case fuel dis-
placement in the industrial sector in 1985
amounted to  less than one percent of the
industrial energy consumption in any of
the AQCR's.

Emissions  Reductions
  The  emissions reductions under  the
base-case scenario in 1985 and 1 995 are
identified  in Table 1, along  with the per-
centage attributed to each fuel type. These
percentages reflect  the relative competi-
tiveness of solar systems  to  different
fuels, as well as the emissions characteris-
tics of the displaced fuel. In most cases,
electricity displacement had the largest

-------
Table 1.    Displaced Emissions, Tonnes/Year (Tons/Year)8
AQCR
Source Category
Houston
Total Tonnes/Year
(Tons/Year)
Percent
Electric0
Gas6
Oifi
Industrial Gas
Industrial Oil
Chicago
Total Tonnes/Year
(Tons/Year)
Percent
Electric
Gas
Oil
Industrial Gas
Industrial Oil
Philadelphia
Total Tonnes/Year
(Tons/Year)
Percent
Electric
Gas
Oil
Industrial Gas
Industrial Oil
Particulates
1985

336.1
(370.6)

99
0
1
0
0

78.7
(86.8)

100
0
0
0
0

200.7
(221.3)

20
0
80
0
0
1995

370.6
(409.6)

76
8
1
0
15

365.7
(403.2)

17
35
48
0
0

346.0
(381.5)

32
29
27
neg
9
Sulfur Oxides
1985

1236.9
(1366.2)

99
0
1
0
0

1495
(1648)

100
0
0
0
0

1140
(1257)

31
0
69
0
0
1995

2555.4
(2821.6)

96
negd
neg
0
4

1700
(1874)

70
neg
30
0
0

2191
(2416)

15
neg
83
neg
2
Carbon Monoxide
1985

44.3
(48.8)

96
0
4
0
0

38.6
(42.6)

100
0
0
0
0

165.2
(182. 1)

16
0
84
0
0
1995

128.7
(141.9)

44
44
2
0
10

373.9
(412.2)

8
68
23
0
0

393.9
(434.3)

6
25
65
2
1
Hydrocarbons
1985

10.2
(1 1-2)

90
0
10
0
0

13.6
(15.0)

100
0
0
0
0

98.2
(108.3)

12
0
88
0
0
1995

51.8
(57.1)

35
44
2
0
19

165.7
(182.7)

7
62
32
0
0

244.7
(249.7)

5
8
85
1
2
Nitrogen Oxides
1985

1135
(1251)

100
0
neg
0
0

287.8
(288.0)

100
0
0
0
0

998.7
(1101)

67
0
33
0
0
1995

1760
(1940)

72
12
neg
0
15

1858
(2049)

37
52
11
0
0

7030
(7751)

9
15
74
1
1
aBase-case scenario.
b Percent of emissions by source category displaced.
                                     cResidential, commercial and public sectors by fuel type.
                                     dNeg = negligible.
impact on  emissions because solar was
most competitive with electricity,  which
has a higher emissions output than gas or
fuel  oil.  The increase in emissions from
1985 to 1995, and the shift in source
category shares of emission reductions
reflect solar's greater capture of gas and
oil market segments in 1995.
                                 The range of displaced emissions brack-
                               eted by  the base-case and  best-case
                               scenarios is shown in Table 2.  The best-
                               case scenario increased emissions  dis-
                               placement  for a given  pollutant and city
                               from 19  percent to more than 700  per-
                               cent over the base-case scenario.   The
                               best-case scenario offered the greatest
emissions displacement in the 1995 time-
frame, where space-heating and industrial-
process applications are just marginally
competitive under the base-case scenario.
  In the cities investigated,  the potential
for reduction of emissions resulting from
solar fuel displacement appears limited.
As shown in Table 3, the overall impact of
 Table 2.
Displaced Emissions Range, Tonnes/Yr (Tons/Yr)

            Particulates           Sulfur Oxides
                                                               Carbon Monoxide
  Hydrocarbons
Nitrogen Oxides
                   Base-Case Best-Case  Base-Case Best-Case  Base-Case  Best-Case   Base-Case  Best-Case   Base-Case  Best-Case
Houston AQCR
1985
1995
Philadelphia AQCR
1985
1995
Chicago AQCR
1985
1995
NOTE 1 Tonne = 7

336.1
(370.6)
371.5
(409.6)
200.7
(221.3)
346.0
(381.5)
78.7
(86.8)
365.7
(403.2)
metric ton =

441.8
(487.1)
665.4
(733.6)
1 157.6
(1276.3)
1341.2
(1478.7)
693.9
(765.0)
1435.6
(1582.8)

1236.9
(1366.2)
2555.4
(2821.6)
1 140. 1
(1257.0)
2190.9
(2415.6)
1494. 7
(1648.0)
1700.1
(1874.4)

1384.6
(1529. 1)
5008. 1
(5530.8)
2699.6
(2976.4)
2933.8
(3234.6)
2882.2
(3177.7)
3767.5
(4153.8)

44.3
(48.8)
128.7
(141.9)
165.2
(182. 1)
393.9
(434.3)
38.6
(42.6)
373.9
(412.2)

84.6
(93.3)
303.8
(335.0)
561.0
(618.5)
731.0
(806.0)
584.8
(644.8)
1 156.0
(1274.5)

10.2
(1 1.2)
51.8
(57. 1)
98.2
(108.3)
226.6
(249.7)
13.6
(15.0)
165.7
(182.7)

27.5
(30.3)
133.2
(146.9)
310.2
(341.8)
389.3
(429.2)
257.0
(283.3)
537.1
(592.2)

1 134.9
(1251.3)
1 759.3
(1939.7)
998.7
(1101.1)
7030. 1
(7750.9)
261.2
(288.0)
1853.4
(2048.0)

1511.2
(1666.1)
3640.4
(4013.7)
4028. 1
(4441.1)
8955. 1
(9873.3)
4164.9
(4591.9)
7457. 1
(822 1. 7)
1. 102 short tons.

-------
Table 3. Total Displaced Emissions as Percent ofAQCR Total3
1985 (tonnes/year)
Houston Chicago
Pollutant
Particulates
Sulfur Oxides
Carbon Monoxide
Hydrocarbons
Nitrogen Oxides
Total
Tonnes/year
336.1
1236.9
44.3
10.2
1 134.9
Percent
displaced of
total emissions''
0.2
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
Total
tonnes/year
78.7
1494. 7
38.6
13.6
261.2
Percent
displaced of
total emissions13
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Philadelphia
Total
Tonnes/year
200.7
1 140. 1
165.2
98.2
998.7
Percent
displaced of
total emissions1'
0.1
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
  aBase-case scenario.
  bBased on total 1975 emissions data for each AQCR.
  active solar thermal technologies on total
  AQCR emissions in the base-case in 1985
  is less than one percent for each pollutant.
  Under the best-case scenario,  emission
  reductions are never greater  than  two
  percent of total emissions of any pollutant
  Emissions reductions as a percentage of
  total  AQCR emissions are  low, mainly
  because of the large percentage of emis-
  sions from market segments where solar
  is not competitive, or from other sources
  of emissions, such as road dust

  Conclusions
    For the metropolitan areas considered
  in this study, emissions reductions which
  occur throughout the AQCR  due to solar
  thermal energy development are likely to
  be relatively small. The same is  expected
  to be true for other cities with similar fuel
  costs, fuel mixes, insolation and incentives
  for solar energy use. However, some other
  urban areas of  the country have high
  insolation, which favors  capture of  the
  energy  conversion  market by solar  sys-
  tems. Also, state and local incentives for
  solar energy  use  are stronger in some
  regions  of  the  country,  increasing  the
  economic attractiveness of solar systems
      and their potential impact on  fuel con-
      sumption. The resulting emissions reduc-
      tions may also be greater,  but this will
      depend on the fuel prices, space heating
      and hot water fuel mix, and industrial mix.
         Even in the three AQCR's considered
      here, solar  energy  has  the potential to
      displace a small amount of fossil fuel in
certain market sectors during the next ten
to fifteen  years.  Solar energy  is most
competitive with water heating and electric
end-uses in the residential, commercial
and public sectors. Area source emissions
reductions (which are typically difficult to
achieve) might ead to significant reduc-
tions in urban background pollutant levels.
         This Project Summary was prepared by the staff of Energy and Environmental
          Analysis, Inc., Arlington,  VA 22209.
         Benjamin L. Blaney is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
         The complete report,  entitled "An Assessment of the Effects of Active Solar
           Thermal Technologies on Urban Emissions," (Order No. PB 83-156 927; Cost:
           $13.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
                 National Technical Information Service
                 5285 Port Royal Road
                 Springfield, VA 22161
                 Telephone: 703-487-4650
         The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                 Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Cincinnati. OH 45268
                                              
-------