United States
                 Environmental Protection
                 Agency
 Industrial Environmental Research
 Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                 Research and Development
EPA-600/S7-83-049 Dec. 1983
4>ERA        Project  Summary
                 Long  Term Optimum
                 Performance/Corrosion
                 Tests  of Combustion
                 Modifications for Utility Boilers-
                 Host Site:  Columbus and
                 Southern  Ohio  Electric
                 Company  Conesville No. 5
                 P.S. Natanson
                  The report gives results of part of a
                 study of corrosion in large utility boilers
                 burning high-sulfur coal, as  possibly
                 affected by combustion modifications
                 for decreased nitrogen oxide (NO,)
                 emissions. During the first part of this
                 study, each boiler was characterized to
                 learn the short term effects of various
                 combustion modifications on boiler
                 operation and emissions. Later, a Level
                 1 environmental assessment (EA)  of
                 boiler operation was performed, followed
                 by tests to measure corrosion rates in
                 the furnace. Abo, two 30-day continuous
                 emission monitoring (CEM) tests were
                 performed. This report discusses work
                 on  Boiler No.  5 at Columbus and
                 Southern Ohio Electric Co.'s Conesville
                 (OH) generating station. During the
                 short-term characterization tests, full
                 load NO, emissions (as equivalent NO»)
                 were reduced from  263 to 152  ng/J
                 without adverse side  effects. NO,
                 emissions during the 30-day CEM tests
                 were log-normally distributed with a
                 mean of 180-224 ng/J and a geometric
                 dispersion of 1.13 - 1.19. The Level 1
                 EA revealed no unusual environmental
                 hazards resulting froivi low-NO. opera-
                 tion. For the nearly 2-year study,
                 waterwall corrosion rates (measured
ultrasonically) were similar to rates
under normal operation at about 1-2
mils/yr.»
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Industrial Environmental
Research Laboratory. Research Triangle
Park, NC. to announce key findings of
the research project that is fully
documented in a separate report of the
same title (see Project Report ordering
information at back).

Introduction
  For coal-fired utility boilers, NO,
emission regulations can often be met by
using such combustion modification
(CM) techniques as decreased total
excess air flow. However, this could lead
to a chemically reducing atmosphere in
the furnace and an increased corrosion
potential. Under this program, methods
of decreasing NO, emissions were
studied (characterization testing) from
environmental and corrosion points of
view. To this end, the program included
four parts: boiler characterization. Level
1  environmental assessment (EA), corro-
"Reeden mart femitter with metric unit* nay use
 the conversion fectors ft the end of thi*
 Summery.

-------
sion testing,  and 30-day continuous
emission monitoring (CEM). Several
large utility boilers were studied during
this long-term performance/corrosion
study. This report deals with the No. 5
boiler at Columbus and Southern Ohio
Electric Co.'s Conesville (OH) generating
station.

Background
  NO,  has  long  been considered  an
undesirable  component  of the earth's
atmosphere. In parts-per-million concen-
trations, NO, is  considered  to  be a
precursor to acid precipitation, photochem-
ical smog,  and  irritation in  human
respiratory  systems.  Since the  early
1970s, after coal-fired utility boilers were
identified as a major NO, source, EPA has
supported research  for NO, control at
these large boilers.
  Under the sponsorship of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Exxon Research  and Engineering Co.
studied  the  effects  of boiler  operating
conditions on NO, emissions. These and
similar studies led to improved operating
procedures for NO, reduction. The new
procedures (known as combustion modifica-
tions (CMs)  included decreased excess
air flow and staged combustion. However,
these CMs could increase the chemically
reducing nature of the gases  in certain
regions  of the furnace,  increasing the
corrosion rate on the fireside of the
boiler's  waterwall tubes,  especially in
boilers burning high sulfur coal.
  The program reported  here was a
follow-on to the earlier work. During this
program, furnace wall corrosion was
studied at several coal-fired utility boilers
designed to use CM for  reducing NO.
emissions. Some of the CMs included the
use of overfire air and low-NO, burners to
meet the applicable new source performance
standards (NSPS) for NO, emissions (301
ng/J as N02).

Work Plan
  The  test  program contained four
phases: boiler characterization; corrosion
testing  by  probes,  panels,  and wall
measurements; Level 1 environmental
assessment; and 30-day continuous NO,
monitoring.
   During boiler characterization, effects
of various boiler CMs were assessed and
their ability  to reduce  NO,  emissions
without causing short-term, adverse side
effects (such as increased slagging) was
evaluated. This resulted in  optimized
operating procedures for NO, control and
system  flexibility. During this time, flue
 gas emissions and fuel and ash composi-
tions were monitored. Also, furnace gas
composition was monitored at various
locations along the furnace wall (furnace
gas  tap sampling) to identify locally
corrosive environments for further study.
  Corrosion testing was  initiated after
boiler  characterization. Three  methods
(corrosion probes, corrosion panels, and
wall thickness mapping)  were used  to
evaluate corrosion.
  Corrosion probes were used to evaluate
short term (30 to 1000 hour) corrosion
effects. In  this method, pieces of  wall
tube material (called corrosion coupons
or test rings) were inserted at  five
different locations in the furnace for
various times and then weighed  to
determine the rate of metal loss.  This
qualitative indirect method did not give a
true reading of actual wall losses, but it
was an economically attractive alternative
to methods which require entering the
furnace during an outage to measure the
tubes directly,  as discussed below.
  The corrosion  panel  method  was
probably the most reliable method used
for measuring  corrosion. In this method,
eight sections  of the boiler wall were
removed, and  replaced by new sections
(called corrosion  panels)  on which the
tube wall thickness had  been  carefully
measured. About 2 years later, the
furnace was  re-entered (during an
outage) and the panels were remeasured.
The  wall thickness measurements were
made  ultrasonically,  a nondestructive
test in which high  frequency  sound
•waves are bounced off the inner wall of
the tube and the thickness is determined
from the echo  time delay.
  Wall thickness  mapping  involved
ultrasonic thickness (UT) measurements
of walls throughout the furnace. The first
set of such wall measurements occurred
during the outage in which the corrosion
panels were installed, and the second set
was about 2 years later (coincident  with
the final panel measurements).
   During these long term corrosion tests,
an EPA Level 1  environmental assessment
(EA) test was performed. It  included
physical, chemical, and biological (toxicity)
analysis of the major streams entering
and leaving  the boiler. The Source
Assessment Sampling System (SASS)
train was used to sample the flue gas
stream, while EPA Method 17 was  used
to measure paniculate removal efficiencies
(i.e., electrostatic precipitator [ESP]
collection efficiency). Other  streams
sampled included sluice water,  coal, and
ESP hopper ash.
   Twice, during  the 2-year corrosion
exposure period, NO, and other  flue
gases were  monitored  continuously for
30  days using a continuous emission
monitoring (CEM)  system.  The 30-day
CEM tests quantified flue gas emissions
over normal  boiler  load cycles and for a
longer period than was possible during
the characterization tests.  These tests
also indicated how CEMs may be expected
to perform (reliability, accuracy, mainte-
nance needs, etc.) in similar situations.

Boiler Description
  Conesville No. 5 is  the fifth boiler
constructed  at Columbus and Southern
Ohio Electric Company's (C&SOE) Cones-
ville (OH) generating station. Burning
nearly 200  tons/hr of  high-sulfur  coal
(high corrosion  potential) to generate
more than 400 MW of electric power, its
20  burners  use tangential firing  in a
single-compartment,  balanced-draft,
waterwall boiler to produce about 3,000,
000 Ib/hr of  super heated steam (1000°F,
2800 psi). Designed by Combustion Engi-
neering (CE) Inc., it uses CMs (e.g., over-
fire air) to guarantee compliance with the
applicable NSPS  for NO, emissions  (301
ng/J NO, as N02), and  is one of the first
utility  boilers  to be governed by  this
NSPS.

Results
Boiler Characterization
  During the first part of this study, Exxon
evaluated several CMs which could be
used  to  reduce  NO, emissions. Three
were selected for detailed study: decreased
total excess  air flow, increased overfire
air  flow, and upward overfire air nozzle
tilt.
  By optimizing these parameters (Figure
1), full load NO, emissions (as equivalent
NO2) were decreased from 263 to 152
ng/J without  adverse, short-term  side
effects. (The applicable NSPS emission
rate is 301 ng/J as NO2.)
  In addition, by  using the data from the
boiler characterization tests, an improved
operating procedure was  adopted for
medium and full  load operation.
  As expected, flue gas  and fuel analysis
for  sulfur confirmed that most fuel sulfur
is converted  to S02 and then delivered to
the scrubber for subsequent cleanup.
  Furnace gas  sampled in the combustion
zone (near  the furnace waterwalls)
showed that  the lowest CO concentrations
were in the hopper zone, and that the
region where  corrosion was most likely
(low Oz, high CO) was in the chemically
reducing environment around the burner
zone. After  the  characterization work,
corrosion in this and other  regions  was
studied in greater detail using corrosion

-------
 I
 d
600


500

446

400


300
259

200


700
              !  "As Found" Operating Point
             93
                                     Load	Full
                                     OF A Tilt	0
                                     Burner Tilt  	0
                                                         Normal Air (-4.3% Ot)
                                                   •-A- Low Air (-3.0% Ot)
Note:                      12
By decreasing the total excess air
flow, and opening the overfire air
dampers to divert some of the air
to the top of the furnace, NO,
emissions were decreased from
446 to 259 pp_m.	i
                                                 Improved
                                                 Operating
                                                 Point
                         25              50
                          Overfire Air (OFA) Dampers. % Open
                                                     75
                                                         too
Figure 1.    NO* versus overfire air, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Co., Conesville No. 5.
probes and ultrasonic tubewall thickness
measurement methods.
  In the  "as-found" condition,  NOX
emissions from the  Conesville No. 5
boiler were well within  the  applicable
NSPS limit (301 ng/J). As a result of this
program, the full load  NOX emissions, as
NOa were reduced 42% (from 263 to 152
ng/J). These data were used to set up
and "fine tune" the boiler, resulting in
improved operating  procedures  with no
adverse,  short-term side effects. Long-
term effects (such  as corrosion) were
studied in detail as the program continued.

Level 1 Environmental
Assessment (EA)  Testing
  The Level  1 EA test at Conesville No. 5
involved the major inlet and effluent
streams  crossing the plant's process
boundaries. The streams sampled included
the inlet and outlet of the electrostatic
precipitator (ESP), the  ESP hopper catch,
the fuel feed, and the sluice water flush-
ing the furnace  hopper.
  The Level 1 test was performed  as a
screening study to determine potential
pollutants in the various streams and
included three  types of  analysis: (1)
chemical analysis was used to determine
the chemical composition of the various
streams; (2) physical analysis of particles
entrained  in various  streams provided
information  on  shape  and size; and (3)
biological  analysis provided information
on the toxic or mutagenic effects of the
various streams on living  matter.
  The test  showed that,  as expected,
most of the flue gases leaving the
combustor and going to cleanup devices
                                     are fixed gases (02, CO& Nz, etc.). Other
                                     components of this stream include sulfur
                                     compounds, hydrocarbons, and entrained
                                     paniculate matter.
                                       Measurements taken at  the ESP'
                                     showed that the particulars matter (fly
                                     ash) in the flue gas stream represents
                                     more than 60% of the total ash leaving
                                     the system (the rest, slag or bottom ash,
                                     exits by another stream; e.g., the sluice
                                     water stream to the settling pond). Also,
                                     more than 98% of the fly ash (mostly the
                                     larger  particles) is removed by cleanup
                                     devices, never reaching the stack.
                                       The  particulate matter and entraining
                                     flue gases contained low  levels  of
                                     organics (mostly alkyl esters): concentra-
                                     tions of most metals were near or below
                                     detectable levels. (Table 1 lists the metals
                                     data for solid and liquid samples; EPA
                                     priority metals for wastewater are shown
                                     first.)  Organic  matter on particulate
                                     favored the smaller particles.  At the
                                     precipitator inlet,  the particles  were
                                     generally spherical, and composed
                                     mostly of silicate material.
                                       The fly ash particles sampled from the ESP
                                     hopper were less spherical than the parti-
                                     cles at the ESP inlet, ranged from 1 to 40
                                     //m, and, like the ash entering the ESP,
                                     contained mostly silicates.
                                       While these  tests were underway,
                                     supplemental  tests were  performed  by
                                     Acurex Corporation under separate EPA
                                     contract. The Acurex data shows that, as
                                     the sluice water passes through the
                                     system, there is an  increase in acidity,
                                     total suspended solids, chemical and
                                     biological  oxygen demand,  and  total
                                     organic carbon. The effluent sluice water
samples contained very low levels  of
metal anions.
  The  coal extract was separated into
seven fractions, but the spectra of each
fraction were generally too complex to be
analyzed by EPA  Level  1  procedures.
Instead, the major peaks are listed in the
full report, and show that the extract was
highly  aromatic,  highly  oxygenated
material containing phenolic material,
carboxylic acids, amides, and aliphatics.
Most aromatic rings  had two or more
substrtuents. Mono-substituted aromatics
were rare.
  Biological tests  (using living matter)
were used to assess the environmental
effect of process effluents on life forms.
These tests indicated (Table 2) that the
coal, ESP hopper ash, and  sluice water
are  not mutagenic. The Rat  Alveolar
Macrophage (RAM) assays were also
negative. The Chinese Hamster Ovary
(CHO) cell assay yielded toxic responses
with coal  leachates and sluice water.
Moderate to high toxicity was also
recorded for some  of the aquatic assays.
Sluice water caused no toxicity in any of
the aquatic species studied, but stimulated
the growth of algae.

Corrosion Tests
  To more fully evaluate the longer term
side effects of low-NO« operation, corrosion
testing began after the characterization
period,  and included  corrosion probes,
corrosion panels,  and wall thickness
mapping.
  With  corrosion  probes,  as exposure
time increased, the rate of metal loss
seemed to decrease from more than 70 to
less  than 20 mils/yr; thus, the loss rate
for the probes approached the  loss rate
for the furnace walls (which the probes
were designed to simulate). The corrosion
panels had an average loss rate of 1.04
mils/yr,  which compares well  with the
average wall loss rate (Table 3) of 1.39
mils/yr.
  Table 3 seems to indicate that tubes in
the burner zone corrode faster than non-
burner-zone tubes. However, the difference
is small, and no strong correlation was
found between corrosion rate and location
in the  furnace. Also,  no eccentric tube
wear or  loss of roundness was noticed,
and the tubes close to the burners did not
corrode  measurably faster than those
farther from the flame. On the average,
the rate of corrosion in this boHer was
such that it would require more than 30
years for the  tubes to lose half their
thickness. Therefore, corrosion rates,
while operating in compliance with NSPS
NOx regulations, appear to be acceptable.

-------
Table 1.    Metal Concentrations and Emissions in Various Conesville No. 5 'Process Streams

                             (Results in ftg of metal/g of each stream.)
                   Flue Gas Stream
Element
Ag
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
Tl
Zn
Al
Ba
Ca
Co
Fe
K
Li
Mg
Mn
Mo
Na
P
Si
Sn
Sr
Ti
V
10 and 3 ion
Fly Ash
Particles*
<1.8
83."

-------
 Table 2.  Conesville No. 5 Boiler Bioassay Results (Summary)  fcont.J
Bottom Precipitator ESP Outlet
Ash/Water Slurry (ESP) Hopper Ash Coal To Stack (XAD-2)

Magna (Water Flea)
Fresh Water Algae
£Csoc (Dose
that kills 5O%)
EC™ (Dose
that kills 95%)
Exxon Acurex Exxon
Data Data Data
U H
2.5 to
6.7
mg/L
4.4 to
16.2
mg/L
Acurex Exxon Acurex Exxon
Data Data Data Data
H
328 to
367
mg/L
830 to
963
mg/L
Acurex
Data

 'Not mutagenic, but toxic to cells. (Up to the time of cell death, no mutations had been observed.)
 "Dose = 1000 mg of sample/liter of culture.
 ^Bottom ash affected acidity in Acurex's algae test:
 O ash, pH = 7. /, and
 25 mg/L, pH = 3.6.

 Key
 H = High toxicity
 M = Moderate toxicity
 L  = Low toxicity
 U = Undetected
 -  = Not tested (usually due to insufficient sample)
Table 3.    Conesville No. 5 Boiler
       Long Term Corrosion Results
        (On-line Time = 12.OOO hr)
                         Wall Loss
Location
mils    mils/yr
Nose
Burner
Zone
Hopper

Averages:
 Burner Zone
 Non-Burner Zone
 Grand Average
0.8
2.0

2.1
1.8
2.9

1.5
 2.3
 1.4
 1.9
0.6
1.5

1.6
1.4
2.2

1.1
1.7
1.1
1.4
and  182 ng/J for the first and second
tests. The standard deviation was about
10 percent  of the mean value. The
statistical parameters in Table 4 are in
good agreement with the probability plots
shown in the full report.
  Similarly, for the second test, the NO«
emissions rate and excess oxygen levels
were fairly steady: both showed standard
deviations of about 9 % of the mean value.
  The CEM system (utilizing an extractive
sampling system) passed the EPA perfor-
mance specifications for accuracy, drift,
response time, etc. and provided accurate
gaseous emissions data  for the test.
However,  both  calibration of the instru-
Table 4.   Statistical Parameters for Conesville Unit No. 5
             30-Day Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) Tests

                                         First 30-Day Test
Thirty-day Continuous
Emission Monitor (CEM) Tests
  Twice during the long-term operating
period, flue gas emissions were measured
for 30 days using continuous emissions
monitors (CEMs). The data proved useful
for evaluating boiler  emissions  over
normal load cycles for longer periods than
during the earlier characterization tests.
The CEM data also helped to evaluate the
abilities, potential problems, and perfor-
mance limitations that might be associated
with CEMs  in similar situations. Table 4
summarizes the data.
  Although the boiler steam load varied
widely  (e.g., from about  80 to 40% of
maximum capacity during the first CEM
test),  the NO  emission rate was fairly
steady with mean values (Table 4) of 226

Mean
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Standard Deviation
Percent Deviation
Variance
Count
Load
MWth
490.7
646.0
311.4
334.6
101.1
20.6
10.214
29
02
6.3
5.7
8.6
2.9
0.9
13.0
0.81
29
COi
11.5
10.2
12.5
2.3
0.7
6.1
0.49
29
CO
ppm'
320
0
914
914
280
87.5
78400
29
ng/J
114
0
329
329
100
87.5
WOOD
29
ppm'
387
303
447
144
40
10.3
1600
29
NO
ng/J
226
177
261
84
23
10.3
52.9
29

b/irfBtu*
0.526
0.412
0.607
0.195
0.053
10.3
1.230
29
                                                          Second 30-Day Test

Mean
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Standard Deviation
Percent Deviation
Variance
Count
Load
MWo,
647.2
445.1
801.9
356.8
87.7
13.6
7693.0
35
Ot
%
5.63
4.5
7.0
2.5
0.524
9.3
0.275
35
COt
%
11.94
10.5
13.2
2.7
0.558
4.7
0.312
35
CO
ppm'
49.2
14
135
121
25.07
52.0
628.6
35
ng/J
17.2
5.0
48.0
43.0
8.86
52.0
78.56
35
ppm'
310.1
233
381
148
28.46
9.0
96172
34
NO
ng/J
182.1
137.0
223.0
86.0
16.32
9.0
266.3
34

Ib/KfBtif
0.42
0.32
0.52
0.20
0.04
9.0
0.0016
34
                  'Corrected to 3% Oa dry.
                  "As N02.

-------
ments on a daily basis and maintenance
of the sampling system were necessary.

Conclusions
  Combustion modification effectively
reduces NO, emissions from coal-fired
utility boilers, without adverse side
effects. On the average, for the Conesville
boiler, tube wall corrosion rates from low-
NOx operation will not decrease or limit
the useful life of the boiler. The Level 1
test confirms that no unusual environmen-
tal hazards result from Iow-N0« operation.
  The  30-day  CEM tests  show that,
through a good maintenance and calibration
program, CEMs can be made to meet the
EPA performance specifications.

Recommendations
  When possible, combustion modifications
(CMs)  should  be  considered as  an
effective approach to NO* control on coal-
fired utility  boilers.  However,  slagging
and other possible side effects should be
monitored to ensure that satisfactory
operation continues.
  Because CM for NOX control  requires
close  observation and tight control  on
boiler operations, a well maintained contin-
uous  emission  monitor  (CEM) for  CO
should be used  to help decrease excess
air to optimum levels.

Conversion Factors
  Readers more familiar with the metric
system may use the following factors to
convert  units to that system:

 Non-metric    Times    Yields metric
     °F
     Ib
     mil
     psi
5/9(°F-32)
  0.454
   24.5
  0.070
  °C
  kg
  //m
kg/cm2
                             P. S. Natanson is with Exxon Research and Engineering Co.. Florham Park, NJ
                               07932.
                             David G. Lachapelle is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
                             The complete report, entitled "Long  Term Optimum Performance/Corrosion
                               Tests  of Combustion Modifications  for Utility Boilers; Host Site: Columbus
                               and Southern Ohio Electric Company. Conesville No.  5," (Order No. PB 84-
                               102 698; Cost: $26.50, subject to change) will be available only from:
                                     National Technical Information Service
                                     5285 Port Royal Road
                                     Springfield. VA 22161
                                     Telephone: 703-487-4650
                             The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                                     Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                     Research Triangle Park. NC27711

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati-OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
                                                                                              U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-759
                                                                                                                                   102/BCJ

-------