United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-87/011 May 1987
Project Summary
Reburning Application to  Firetube
Package Boilers

J. A. Mulholland, E. E. Stephenson, C. Pendergraph, and J. V. Ryan
  A pilot-scale experimental research
program has been conducted to examine
the physical and chemical phenomena
associated with the NOX control tech-
nology of reburning applied to gas- and
liquid-fired firetube  package boilers.
Reburning (staged fuel  combustion)
diverts some of the fuel and combustion
air from the main burner(s) for injection
into the post-flame gases, resulting in
three distinct zones in the boiler radiant
section:  a fuel-lean  primary zone, a
fuel-rich reburning zone, and a fuel-lean
burnout zone. NOX is reduced both by
reduction  of  NOX formation and by
destruction of primary flame NOX by
secondary fuel radicals.
  Several hypotheses were evaluated.
Results indicate that the overall NO,
reduction via  reburning has a reaction
rate order of about 1.5 with respect to
primary  NOX.  Secondary fuel-bound
nitrogen is found to  reduce  reburning
effectiveness. An overall gas-phase re-
action time constant of 50  ms  is ob-
served for the reburn zone nitrogenous
species; the characteristic time constant
is greater for  liquid fuel reburning due
to droplet vaporization requirements.
Increased temperature  increases N2
formation in  the  fuel-rich  zone, but
decreases N2 formation in the burnout
zone.  Secondary fuel injector design
does not significantly influence reburn-
ing effectiveness in the firetube package
boiler class  because  of large-scale
turbulent structures in the reacting flow
that dominate secondary fuel jet pa-
rameters.  Nitrogen-free fuel oil  yields
slightly greater NO, reductions than
natural gas in reburning application.
These results were obtained on a 1.0
MW (3.5  x 10' Btu/hr) research boiler
simulator and verified on a commercial
Scotch package  boiler (2.5 x  106
Btu/hr).
  It is shown that, with minimal facility
modification, NOX  emissions from  a
firetube package boiler can be reduced
by 50% or more from an initial level of
200 ppm (measured dry, at zero % O2)-
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
Park, NC, to announce key findings of
the research project that Is fully docu-
mented In a separate report of the same
title (see Project Report ordering In-
formation at back).

Introduction
  Experimental research  has been con-
ducted to study the physical and chemical
phenomena associated with gaseous and
liquid fuel reburning applied to two fire-
tube package boilers. The test results
show that reburning is an effective way
to control the emission of  oxides of
nitrogen (NOX), even at  low initial NOX
levels. For initial NOX levels of >100 ppm,
50-80% NOX reductions  have been ob-
tained. Reburning can be coupled with
other NOX control technologies to yield
NOX emissions of<100 ppm.
  Reburning (staged fuel combustion) is
an in-f urnace NOX control technology that
diverts some of the fuel and combustion
air  flows from the main burner(s) for
injection into the post-flame gases. With
this combustion  modification, three
stoichiometrically distinct zones are es-
tablished in the boiler radiant section: a
fuel-lean primary zone,  a fuel-rich re-
burning zone, and  a fuel-lean burnout
zone. NOX reduction via reburning occurs
both by the molecular destruction of NOX
formed in the primary combustion zone
through reactions with secondary flame

-------
radicals and by an overall reduction of
NOX formed due to distributed mixing of
fuel and air. Figure 1 is a cartoon depicting
this process.

Bench-Scale and  Other Tests
  Bench-scale tests performed elsewhere
identify the important  reburning  NOX
reduction mechanisms. It has been shown
that the methylidyne  radical (CH") result-
ing from pyrolysis of the staged fuel reacts
with NO (formed in the primary combus-
tion zone) to form hydrogen cyanide (HCN).
       In  the reburning  zone,  HCN  reacts to
       form amines which can react with nitric
       oxide (NO) to form molecular nitrogen.
       Alternatively, fixed nitrogen species can
       oxidize in the  reburning  and burnout
       zones to form NOX.
         Full-scale field  tests  in Japan  in the
       late 1970s and early 1980s showed that
       50% NOX reduction is  achievable with
       reburning over a wide range of initial NOX
       conditions burning gas, oil, or coal in the
       reburning zone. These promising results
       raised fundamental questions leading to
                    Reburning /V0« Destruction Mechanism:
             CH
      /VO«
                    HCN
NH,
            NH3
                                                              NO
       Burnout
         Air
       Reburn
        Fuel
       Main
      Burners
Figure 1.   Reburning.
further research and development in the
U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
(EPA), the Department of Energy (DOE),
the  Electric  Power  Research Institute
(EPRI), and the Gas Research Institute
(GRI) have sponsored various parametric
reburning studies.


EPA Tests
  To bridge the gap between fundamental
study of reburning mechanisms and full-
scale reburning application, the U.S. EPA
conducted in-house reburning tests from
May 1983 through May 1985  at  its
Environmental  Research Center in Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. Two pilot-scale
firetube package  boiler test facilities (a
research simulator and a commercial
unit) were modified for reburning applica-
tion, with these key characteristics:
  • Nominal firing rate — 0.6 - 0.9 MW
     (2-3x106Btu/hr).
  • Fuels — natural gas  and light and
     heavy fuel oils.
  • Low primary NOX levels — 50 - 250
     ppm (all NOX concentrations reported
     dry, at zero % 02).
  • Low reburning zone  temperatures
     — 1300 - 1600 K (1900 - 2400°F).
The test facilities simulate the thermal
environment and turbulent diffusion flame
aerodynamics of small firetube package
boilers. The  simple furnace  geometry,
with a single centerline burner mounted
to a horizontal, cylindrical  boiler, results
in  a nearly  two-dimensional system,
allowing for complete spatial (and tempo-
ral) characterization of the combustion
gas temperature, velocity,  and composi-
tion. Natural gas and light and heavy fue
oils were fired in the primary and reburn-
ing burners, with ammonia and pyridine
dopants used as fuel nitrogen surrogates
A schematic  of  the  research package
boiler simulator is shown in Figure 2.
  Baseline conditions  were establishec
to focus study on low primary NOX level:
for two reasons:  (1)  to  evaluate  ar
apparent discrepancy in results reportec
by various investigators, and (2) to targe
most likely  candidates for  reburninj
application. First, laboratory and field dat;
reported by Japanese  investigators  in
dicate that NOX reduction by reburning i;
independent of initial NOX level; however
data from bench-scale tests conducted ii
the  U.S. indicate that  NOX reduction b'
reburning decreases as initial NOX level:
decrease. Second, application of reburnini
is likely to be coupled with  primary flami
NOX control (e.g., low NOX burner). Cos
effective primary combustion modifica
tions exist to reduce NO, levels to betweei

-------
                                                           cxhaus<
       Primary
        Air
                                                                     Burnout
                                                                       Air
               Low NO* \
             Drecombustion
               Chamber
                Burner
                             Primary^* Reburning    Burnout
                               Zone        Zone       Zone
  Primary
   Fuel
 Figure 2.    Package boiler simulator schematic
                                                                   Reburnmg
                                                                     Fuel
200 and 400 ppm; reburning can then be
applied to reduce NOX  emission  by an
additional 50%
   Reburning parametric tests  included
both input/output and detailed sampling
of combustion gas temperature, velocity,
and speciation. The test matrix included
variation of the following parameters to
evaluate several hypotheses:
able reburning fuel nozzles were used to
adjust secondary fuel mixing rates. The
temperature in the boiler was changed
by insulating portions of the radiant zone.

EPA Findings
  Several findings  from  the  research
boiler simulator reburning experiments
were significant. Figure 3 shows the ef-
Primary Zone
• Initial NOX concentration
• Stoichiometry
• Fuel type
• Flame shape
Reburning Zone
Stoichiometry
Fuel nitrogen content
Residence time
Temperature
Mixing rate
Fuel type
Fuel staging location
Burnout Zone
• Stoichiometry
• Temperature
• Mixing rate
These parameters were varied indepen-
dently to as great a degree as possible.
Primary NOX concentration was controlled
by  varying  the level  of  primary fuel
dopant;  primary zone Stoichiometry,  by
primary combustion  air flow rate; and
primary flame  shape,  by  primary axial
and radial  air  split.  Reburning zone
Stoichiometry was varied by varying the
amount of secondary fuel addition (with
primary load held constant)   Reburning
zone residence time was varied by varying
the location of burnout air addition. Vari-
fects of initial NOX concentration, reburn
zone  Stoichiometry,  and fuel nitrogen
content. The overall  reburning reaction
rate order with respect to primary NOX is
about  1.5, as NOX reductions decrease
with decreasing levels of primary  NOX.
There  is  an optimum reburn zone Sto-
ichiometry for NOX reduction, dependent
on  initial  NOX level and  reburning fuel
nitrogen content. The optimum Stoichio-
metry  for  primary  NOX  destruction is
about 0.9; however, dilution effects from
staged combustion typically result in an
optimum reburn zone Stoichiometry for
overall NOX reduction in the range of 0.7
- 0.9. Secondary fuel nitrogen content is
shown to have  a large  impact  on re-
burning effectiveness,  significantly re-
ducing NOX  reductions for primary NOX
levels less than  250 ppm. However, at
high initial NOX levels (i.e., greater  than
500 ppm), reburning fuel nitrogen can
actually enhance NOX reduction.
  Figure 4 shows reburning effectiveness
as a function of reburn  zone residence
time for reburning  with natural  gas,
distillate fuel oil, and a distillate/residual
fuel oil mixture. A minimum reburn zone
gas-phase reaction rate time was found
to  be 50  msec,  which  translates  to a
reburn zone length of 0.61  m (2  ft) and
reburn zone bulk residence time  of 200
msec in the firetube  package  boilers
tested. Fuel oil reburning required longer
residence times  to  allow for  droplet
vaporization.
  Other important findings included the
lack of significant overall  effects of tem-
perature and mixing rates in these tests.
Over the limited  range tested, tempera-
ture was  not found to  have a major
influence on overall reburning effective-
ness.  While increased temperature
increased N2 formation in the:reburnmg
zone, N2 formation in the burnout zone
was significant under low temperature
reburning conditions.  Reburning  fuel
nozzle  design did not  significantly in-
fluence reburning effectiveness in these
tests because of large-scale} turbulent
eddy structures in the reacting flow that
dominated reburning fuel mixing. Thus,
secondary fuel jet parameters did  not
control reburning zone mixing rates in
these  tests.  Detailed  probing  in the
furnace of temperature, velocity,  and
speciation provided a deeper understand-
ing of the reburning process. The time-
resolved nitrogen species profiles  shown
in  Figure 5 demonstrate the  kinetic and
mixing  limitations of reburning.

Conclusions
  These  results,  characterizing  the
dependence  of reburning effectiveness
on major parameters, were found to be
consistent for natural gas and fuel oil
firing in the commercial boiler. Light fuel
oil was found to yield slightly greater NOX
reductions that natural gas in reburning
application. With minimal facility  modifi-
cation, Figure 6 shows that NOX emissions
can be .educed  by 50 - 60% from an
initial level of 200 ppm with either  natural
gas or fuel oil reburning.  Reburning is a
way to control  NOX emissions  with a

-------
minimum fuel-rich zone length. However,
for reburning to be effective,  secondary
fuel must  be staged downstream of the
primary combustion zone, which requires
sufficient boiler length.
  NOX formed during combustion by the
reduction  and  oxidation of  molecular
nitrogen and nitrogen contained in the
fuel contribute to the degradation of air
quality as  well as to acid deposition and
forest damage. Reburning is one of many
NOX control technologies presently avail-
able. While NOX control strategies exist
that can meet current New Source Per-
formance  Standards (NSPS) for NOX
emissions,  few technologies  exist that
can control  NOX emissions to < 100 ppm.
Natural gas reburning can be coupled
with other  NOX control technologies to
achieve this low emission level. Of course,
in selecting a NOX control strategy for a
particular application, cost analysis must
be  considered along with  technical
feasibility.  Reburning, while  more  ex-
pensive and/or difficult to implement than
some other in-furnace NOX control tech-
nologies (such as  air staging or low NOX
burners), is still  much  less  expensive
than pre-combustion fuel  cleaning and
post-combustion catalytic reduction.
      700
       30
         0.7
Figure 3.    Natural gas reburning effectiveness.

                                    4

-------
      700
       90
       80
                        100
                       Reburn Zone Bulk Residence Time, msec

                              200            300   	  400
    I
    Q)
    Q.





    I



    i
70
       60-
       50
       40
                                Distillate/Residual Mixture Fuel Oil
          Natural Gas
               /VOP,,= 185 ppm

               SRR=0.89
                                             \
                    0.25       0.50        0.75        1.00

                                  Reburn Zone Length, m
                                                            1.25
                                                                      1.50
Figure 4.    Reburning zone residence time effect.

-------
           200
           775
           750
           725
       s
       &
       c,-   700
       •3>
       
-------
                              S«R = O.S4
                                     Primary Fuel: Distillate/Residual Fuel Oil Mixture
                                              Uncontrolled NO, = 265 ppm
              46%
   Primary Fuel: Distillate Fuel Oil:
    Uncontrolled NO, - 125 ppm
§
g 50

I

i 25

I
         Gas Distillate  Distillate/Residual
             Fuel Oil      Fuel Oil
                                                          61%
                                                                51%
                                                Natural Distillate Distillate/Residua/
                                                  Gas  Fuel Oil     Fuel Oil
Figure 6.    North American boiler reburning application test results
  J.  Mulholland. E. Stephenson, C. Pendergraph, and J. Ryan are with Acurex
    Corporation. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
  Robert E. Hall is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  The  complete  report,  entitled "Reburning Application to  Firetube  Package
    Boilers." (Order No. PB  87-177 515/AS; Cost: $36.95, subject to change}
    will be available only from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield. VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
          Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
          U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

-------
United States                          Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection               Information
Agency                               Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S7-87/011

-------