OOON92002
nine 1. No. 2
Up Front
WITH HANK HABICHT
I
n his State of the Union address,
President Bush asked each
federal agency to review its regu-
lations over a 90-day period (January
2 8-April 28) to reduce any regulatory
burdens not necessary to meeting our
environmental protection goals and
that may be hampering the nation's economic
recovery. Here at EPA, we see this as a welcome
opportunity to further develop the use of innovative,
cost-effective regulatory approaches to environmental
protection. We'll also be looking for ways to encour-
age innovation and speed pro-growth activities within
EPA'sjunsdiction.
The Administrator and I have asked Dick
Morgenstern to head up this important effort, which
will involve all programs and regions. We intend for
this review to be open and inclusive. Among the areas
that will be fruitful to explore include:
• Proposals for providing flexibility with small
communities and small businesses;
• Increasing incentives for the use of clean fuels,
such as natural gas;
• Reexamining whether existing programs are
effectively meeting intended objectives, such as
looking again at the pending RCRA "mixture and
derived from" rule;
• Expanding market-based approaches to regulations;
• Accelerating inclusionary riHemakings (particularly
Continued on page 3
U.S. Speeds Up Timetable for CFC Phaseout
by Daniel Blank, OAH
On February 11, President Bush announced
that the United States will accelerate —
from the year 2000 to 1995 — the phaseout
of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, carbon tetra-
chloride and methyl chloroform.
The announcement came in response to new find-
ings pointing toward increased stratospheric ozone
depletion. In early February, NASA released prelimi-
nary results from its Arctic stratospheric expedition
indicating extremely high levels of chlorine monoxide
and bromine monoxide over the Arctic and northern-
mid latitudes. These two substances are major causes
of the "ozone hole" over Antarctica.
The President also announced that the United
States will re-examine the phaseout schedule of
hydrochlorofluorocarbons (1 ICFCs), which are less
harmful substitutes for CFCs for some uses, and will
consider recent evidence suggesting that methyl
bromide be phased out. OAR and OPPTS are already
looking into potential substitutes for methyl bromide.
These developments should play a major role in
the upcoming negotiations of the Montreal
Protocol, the international agreement limiting
o/,one-depleting substances. Seventy-five countries
have agreed to the protocol, including the United
States. Negotiations are scheduled to take place in
April 1992 in Nairobi, Kenya.
Inside
Heads Up 2
HRCorner with John Skinner 3
Paths to Promotion 4
Mexican-U.S. Agreement 5
On the Hill 6
People and Progress 7
Calendar 8
Printed on Recyded Paper
-------
Up
A QUICK LOOK AT EPA NEWS AROUND THE NATION
EPA LABORATORIES
y Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las
Vegas — Supervisors at EMSL-LV are doing some
things differently with the Agency's performance
appraisal system. As a part of a 3 -year pilot program
that began last October, the supervisors are:
• keeping performance agreements to one page;
• appraising employees during the month of their
service computation date;
• eliminating numerical scores altogether; and
• rating employees as Outstanding, Highly Successful,
Fully Successful, Needs Improvement, or Unsatisfac-
tory. (Contact: Pat Wunder, FTS-545-2530.)
J Environmental Research Lab, Athens — The Society
of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry recently
presented its highest award to Dr. Samuel W.
Karickhoff, a research chemist at ERL-A. Dr.
Karickhoff is an internationally recognized expert on
the interaction of pollutants with sediments.
/ Health Effects Research Lab, RTF — Scientists at
HERL/RTP have developed a rapid and cost-effective
method for determining if chemicals damage the
central nervous system. This system, which relies on
measuring a biochemical marker linked to nervous
system damage, is included in EPA's revised Neuro-
toxicity Test Guidelines. (Contact: James
O'Callaghan, FTS-629-7779.)
/ Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab,
RTF — AREAL/RTP recently announced a new
clean-up method for contaminated canisters used for
trace-level air sampling. Available canisters, which
were needed for a study of the bioremediation of a
Superfund site near Houston, Texas, had been
severely contaminated from previous studies. In lieu
of purchasing new canisters, scientists developed a
water rinse/extraction method of cleaning the
canisters. (Contact: J.D. Pleil, FTS-629-4680.)
EPA REGIONS
Region 2 — EPA and the Department of the Army
recently signed a consent order that requires the
Army to build a wastewater treatment facility to serve
both McGuire Air Force Base and Fort Dix in New
Jersey. Under this order, the Army could be penalized
up to $3,000 a day for non-compliance. EPA Regional
Administrator Constantine Sidamon-Eristoff said
any penalties could go into an environmental fund to
protect New Jersey's Pineland ecosystem. (Contact:
John Kushwara, FTS-264-9826.)
' 4 — Pat
Tobin, DRA, recently
gave the new "Points
of Light" Award to 25
employees at the
Region's first
Volunteer Awards
Ceremony. Two employees, Cory Berish and Brian
Holtzclaw, have also been nominated for EPA bronze
medals for their service to the community. (Contact:
Norman Black, FTS-257-3004.)
Region 5 — To promote environmental protection in
his native Lithuania, Regional Administrator Val
Adamkus recently established an annual prize of
$1,000. Since Lithuania does not yet have its own
currency, American dollars are highly valued.
(Contact: John Rapsys, FTS-886-6693.)... The U.S.
Postal Service is scheduled to launch in Chicago on
Earth Day a new, 29-cent envelope. Made from
recycled paper, the envelopes will display a "Protect
the Environment" theme.
Region 6 — EPA's regional office in Dallas has a new
Regional Administrator, B. J. (Buck) Wynne. For-
merly head oi the Texas Water Commission, Buck
recently told employees that among his top priorities
are implementation of the Clean Air Act, Border
environmental quality, enforcement, the Gulf of
Mexico, and wetlands. (Contact: Linda Thompson,
FTS-255-6560.)
EPA HEADQUARTERS
EPA Administrator Bill Reilly recently visited Bertie
Backus Junior High School in Northeast D.C., which
is EPA I leadquarters' "partner" in the Partners-In-
Education Program. OARM is heading up efforts to
enlist employees to participate in activities scheduled
through the end of this school year. (Contact: Danny
Gogal, FTS-260-0392.).... The U.S. State Department
recently recognized six EPA employees for their con-
tribution to the U.S./Canada Air Quality Agreement
of 1991: Eileen Claussen-OAR; Brian McLean-
OAR; Dennis Leaf-OAR; Patricia Embrey-OGC;
Wilson Riley-OIA, and Pete Christich-OIA.... HQ
employees will be happy to know that construction of
the ICTC building will not be delayed and that the
Administration remains firmly behind consolidating
EPA within this building. Employees are encouraged
to read the updates on this issue available in the HQ
Library, room M2904. (Contact: Susan Laing,
FTS-260-3581.)
EPAlnSight • March 1992
-------
HKComer
EPA's ability to meet the complex environ-
mental challenges of the future will depend
on the quality of its people. While good
technical, scientific, legal, administrative, and clerical
skills are very important, they are not enough to deal
with the cross-media environmental issues that cut
across many EPA offices and affect different sectors
of society. The EPA Human Resources Council
believes that the future success of the Agency de-
mands the development of people who are:
Change Agents—who inspire and motivate change;
Catalysts for Quality—who lead reforms for
improving productivity and customer satisfaction;
Technological and Innovation Leaders—who under-
stand the power, scope and utility of new technology
and its impact on the workforce;
Team Builders—who are effective in fostering
Up Front
from page 1
negotiated rulemakings, or "reg negs");
• Speeding up rules that reduce the regulatory
burden on the economy;
• Exploring ways to accelerate biotechnology
reforms; and
• Looking with the States at the potential cost
savings from integrating numerous separate State
and Federal monitoring, reporting, permitting and
other process requirements.
As the review goes forward, it's important to keep
in mind that nothing that has been proposed is inconsistent
with EPA priorities. It's also important to note that
many of EPA's regulations are exempt fi~om the morato-
rium because of statutory or judicial deadlines. Both
Michael Boskin, Chairman of the White I louse
Council of Economic Advisors, and Boyden Gray,
the President's Counsel, have assured us that the
exemptions also include 'Any proposals necessary to
meet such deadlines.
This effort is an important way to demonstrate
that we are sensitive to minimi/ing unnecessary costs
of all our programs and that we are asking and listen-
ing to all our constituencies to ensure that we are as
effective as possible. Once this 90-day review process
is complete, we'll let you know, through EPA InSight
and other communication vehicles, what we have
accomplished and what is left to do. In the meantime,
if you have ^ny questions, please contact Dick
Morgenstern's office at FFS-260-4332.
WITH JOHN SKINNER
cooperation and sharing of ideas;
Human Resource Developers—who
can motivate, empower and bring out
the best in others, and
Advocates for Cultural Diversity—
who actively promote understanding
and appreciation of a more diverse
workforce and foster a positive envi-
ronment for the selection, development and retention
of talented women, minority and physically chal-
lenged employees.
Management commitment is essential to establish
an Agency culture that will nurture the development
of people with these skills. EPA managers must
demonstrate the necessary leadership by:
•^ Planning strategically
•^ Communicating in all directions
•^ Empowering employee decision-making
/" Leading teams
^ Encouraging and supporting innovation
»^ Recognizing and rewarding employees
•^ Coaching and giving feedback
Developing an EPA workforce with these charac-
teristics is the vision of the EPA Human Resources
Council.
National Women's
History Month
As recently as 1977, women's history was virtually unknown
as a topic of study in the K-12 curriculum. To correct this
omission, the Education Task Eorce of the California Sonoma
County Commission on the Status of Women started a
"Women's 1 listory Week" in 1977 for the county's schools.
The week of March 8 was chosen to incorporate "Interna-
tional Women's Day," an established event.
In 1981, SenatorOrrin Hatch (R-UT) and then-Repre-
sentative Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), now a Senator herself,
co-sponsored the first Joint Congressional Resolution for
National Women's History Week. Gradually the idea spread
across the country and gained support from many women's
organizations, colleges and universities, and state departments
of education. As a result, in 1987, the national observation was
expanded and renamed "National Women's History Month."
EPA is celebrating Women's I listory Month throughout
the Agency. Eor more information about this event, please
contact your Eederal Women's Program manager.
EPA InSight • March 1992
-------
to Promotion
Enhancing Support Staff Careers
by Edna Rodriguez, OHRM
^L s you may remember from last month's edition
l—\ of EPA InSigbt,John Skinner announced
_A_ . »• that the Agency's Human Resources Coun-
cil had issued a report on ways to help administrative
support staff advance in their careers. Hank Habicht
signed the report and said in a recent memo to all
EPA managers, "This report should serve as a valu-
able tool in providing the motivated and highly-
skilled employees we need to meet the demands of
the EPA office of the future."
Entitled "The Administrative Support Career
Management System," the report is, in effect, a prac-
tical guide for the Agency's administrative support
staff and their supervisors. It outlines the responsibili-
ties of both groups to do some real training needs
identification — especially in the areas of office auto-
mation and program support. The guide also pro-
vides supervisors with easy-to-use guidance on job
restructuring.
The "Administrative Support Career Management
System" is the result of collaborative efforts between
all parts of EPA, especially Regions 8 and 9, the Hu-
man Resources Council, and the Secretarial Advisory
Council. Properly used, this guide can enhance the
careers of the administrative support staff and im-
prove the efficiency of EPA administrative processes.
If you have any questions about this material,
please contact your Human Resources Officer.
Stepping Through the "Looking Glass"
by Grace Sutherland, OHRM
Ever thought about being a top corporate man-
ager for a day? Well, now you have the
chance. OHRM is offering a week-long
course called "Looking Glass" for non-supervisory
employees, grades 13-15. This course is designed to
help employees assess their effectiveness in the EPA
culture and identify' specific ways to enhance their
leadership abilities.
Five-Year Federal Pay Projections from
the White House:
1994
1995
1993
4.7% Raise
4.7% Raise
..37% Raise
1996 4 5% Raise
1997 3 5% Raise
NOTE: Starting in 1994, many Federal employees will also get
supplemental raises based on local private-sector pay.
During the course, participants act as the top lead-
ers of a fictitious company, Looking Glass, Inc. Par-
ticipants are given background information on the
company and their position, a desk, a telephone and
an in-basket brimming with crises, problems and op-
portunities. The participants then "manage" the com-
pany in a six-hour simulation. For the next two days,
the trainers and participants evaluate their effective-
ness as a management team and as individual per-
formers.
After the simulation, each participant receives a
"Letter from Home." This letter contains feedback
on the employees' skills, based on the results of ques-
tionnaires that the participants distributed to their
bosses and peers prior to the course. From all this in-
formation, participants are expected to more clearly
assess their leadership strengths and weaknesses. Fi-
nally, each participant develops an action plan for her
or his future development.
EPA is the first agency to tailor this program
for grade 13-15 employees, who represent the
major feeder group into management positions. The
next course is scheduled for June 22-26 in Lancaster,
PA. Tuition is $1,000 per person plus travel. The EPA
Institute will pay for room and board. For more
information, please contact your Training Officer or
Ron Rago or Brian Smith, OIIRM, FTS-260-6678.
EPAlnSight • March 1992
-------
International Newe
CALIFORNIA
ARIZONA
NEW
MEXICO
TEXAS
TAM ULfPAS
Descontaminacion
de la Frontera
Entre los EE.UU.
y Mexico
traducidopor Cynthia Burke, OAR/SEEP
Cleaning Up the
U.S./Mexico Border
by Richard Kiy, 01 A
On February 25, in Los Angeles, President
Bush, along with Administrator Bill Reilly
and U.S. Trade Representative Carla
Hills, released the Integrated Environmental Plan for
the Mexico/U.S. Border Area. Simultaneously, Secre-
tary Patricio Chirinos, the Administrator's counter-
part in Mexico, released the plan in Tijuana.
The goal of the plan, the first of its kind, is to pro-
tect human health and the natural ecosystems within
the Border area. About 2,000 miles long, the Border
area stretches roughly 60 miles wide into both coun-
tries. Nearly 10 million people live in the Border area.
Highlights of the plan are:
y A U.S. commitment of $241 million in FY 1993
to address environmental problems, including $80
million for wastewater treatment projects. Other
areas to be funded are enforcement,transboundary
air pollution monitoring and mitigation, environ-
mental health, and emergency planning and
response.
J A $147 million commitment from the Mexican
government for environmental infrastructure
projects. Another $6 million has been earmarked
to administer the Border Plan. For the period
1992-1994, Mexico has committed a total of $460
million to finance the plan's objectives.
«/ An agreement to work together to increase public-
awareness of the Border's environmental problems
and to encourage public participation in imple-
menting the plan.
For additional information, please contact me on
FrS-260-0791.
El 25 de febrero, en Los Angeles, el Presidente
Bush, acompanado por el Administrador Bill
Reilly y la Representante de Comercio, Carla
Hills, anuncio el estreno el Plan Integrado sobre el
Ambiente en el Area Fronteriza entre Mexico y los EE.UU.
A la vez, el Secretario Patricio Chirinos, el colega
mejicano de Reilly, tambien proclamo el plan en Tijuana.
Este plan, el primero de esta fndole, tiene como
objetivo la protection de la salud publica y los recursos
ecosistematicos de la region fronteriza. Aproximada-
mente 3.000 kilometres de largo, el area recorre unos
100 kilometres de ancho en ambos lados de la frontera.
Casi diez millones de almas habitan esta region.
Los puntos salientes de este plan son:
/ Los EE.UU. se ha comprometido invertir 241
millones de dolares en el ano fiscal de 1993 con el
fin de afrontar los problemas ambientales regiona-
les; esto incluira 80 millones para los proyectos de
tratamientos de las aguas contaminadas. Otros
proyectos para financiar seran el hacer regir las
regulaciones actuales; someter a vigilancia y
mitigation la contamination atmosferica y de salud
ambiental, como tambien planificar rcacciones en
casos de emergencias.
/ El gobierno mejicano se ha comprometido invertir
147 millones de dolares para proyectos de infraes-
tructura ambiental. Ademas, se ban destinado seis
millones de dolares para la administration del Plan
Fronterizo. Fn total Mexico compromete 460
millones de dolares para financiar los objetivos del
plan, durante el transcurso de los anos 1992 a 1994.
/ Acuerdan las dos naciones trabajar conjuntos para
amphar el conocimiento del piiblico sobre los
problemas ambientales y urgir la participation de
la poblacion en implementar el plan.
Si se necesita information adicional, favor llamar al
senor Richard Kiv, OIA, FFS-260-0791.
RPAlnSight • March 1992
-------
On the Hill
Appropriations Hearings
House — The Appropriations Subcommittee on
HUD, VA, and Independent Agencies (Chairman
Bob Traxler, D-MI) has scheduled hearings on
EPA's budget for March 10, 11 and 12.
Senate — The Appropriations Subcommittee on
HUD, VA, and Independent Agencies (Chairwoman
Barbara Mikulski, D-MD) has scheduled its hearing
on EPA's budget for March 26.
RCRA Reauthorization Hearings
House — The Energy and Commerce Subcom-
mittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materials
has scheduled a hearing for March 10. Chairman
Al Swift, D-WA, who is introducing his bill in parts,
plans to have bill language written and introduced at
this hearing. Sections dealing with municipal solid
waste have already been introduced.
Senate — The Senate is currently revising S. 976,
the comprehensive RCRA bill sponsored by Sen.
Max Baucus (D-MT) and Sen. John Chafee (R-RI).
Staff has circulated a revised recycling portion that re-
quires "responsible entities" to utilize recycled mate-
rials in their products. Other major components of
the bill are expected to cover pollution prevention
(including an expansion of TRI and other toxics use
and source reduction provisions), interstate waste,
and municipal landfills.
TSCA Reauthorization Hearing
Senate — The Environment and Public Works
Subcommittee on Toxic Substances, Environmental
Oversight, Research and Development (Chairman
Harry Reid, D-NV) has scheduled a hearing for
March 25 to look at the possibility of amending
TSCA. The hearing may be the first of many steps in
the process.
Science Hearing
House — The Science, Space, and Technology
Committee (Chairman George Brown, D-CA) has
scheduled a hearing for March 19 to discuss the
Science Advisory Board's recent report on safeguard-
ing the future and the relationship of ORD's budget
to the report's recommendations. (EPA InSight will
cover this report in the April issue.)
EPA's Planning Meeting: A Quality Event
by Lea Swanson, OPPE
Bill Reilly and Hank Habicht are pleased with
the success of this year's Annual Planning
Meeting. And most of those who were there
came away feeling that they had accomplished some-
thing. Why? What went right?
To begin with, the right people participated. Career
office directors and regional division directors were
invited. In prior years, only EPA's political leadership
attended the planning meetings.
Another reason for the meeting's success was the
process — small-team discussions on each of EPA's ten
strategic themes:
V Strategic implementation of statutory mandates
Science/data: EPA's knowledge base
Pollution prevention
/ Geographic targeting
i/ Economic incentives and technological innovation
•/ Multi-media enforcement
/ State and local program capacity
/ International activities
S Education and outreach
/ Management and infrastructure
Using Total Quality Management techniques,
each of the ten teams developed cross-program initia-
tives to overcome barriers that they felt impeded EPA
from achieving its environmental goals. Greer
Tidwell, RA for Region 4, likened the barriers to
"ten-foot high brick walls with alligators on the other
side"! Still, the results of the teams' efforts were im-
pressive: they identified almost 80 potential initiatives
for fiscal year 1994.
Now it's up to the participants to "get the word
out" about the meeting and the recommended initia-
tives, get employee feedback, and start things rolling.
We will report on follow-up activities in future issues
of EPA InSight.
EPA InSight • March 1992
-------
People and Procpeee
EPA: People You
Can Really Bank On
./ j—*•-
E>
:
by Jan Moneysmith, Region 6
: year my wife suffered a major heart attack and
received a heart transplant. She spent many
f weeks in ICU and I spent many hours in the
waiting room and at home trying to take care of the
family. Since I had been with EPA for less than a
year, it did not take long for my leave balances to go
into the hole.
Without my knowing it, my colleagues worked
diligently with human resource experts both in die
region and at Headquarters to get me approved as a
leave recipient under the Agency's Leave Bank Pro-
gram. You can't imagine how surprised and grateful I
was the day I found out, which was shortly before my
wife's transplant operation. While I had been worry-
ing about everything else, my friends—and many who
did not know me at all—made it happen for me.
I can assure you that, without the Leave Bank, I
would be in serious financial difficulty today. And I
would have been worried sick about my leave situa-
tion. It's amazing how quickly the leave disappears!
The Leave Bank gave me not only the ability, but also
the peace of mind I needed, to get me through my
wife's ordeal. Happily, she is doing fine now and it's
good to have my family together again.
My sincere thanks to my friends in Region 6 and
to all of you who have donated leave for people like
me. You really made a difference.
A Gold Medal is Great...
but it isn't the whole story!
by Tom Hartlage, RTP/AREAL
Just as an Olympic athlete's gold medal for a
single event doesn't tell you how much work
and cooperation went into it, the same can be
said about the medals my five colleagues and I
received from the Polish government and EPA. For
Ronald Drago, Thomas Logan, Thomas Lawless,
Steve Scarabin, Ray Ballard and me, it's a story of
international
cooperation and
friendship.
It began in
February 1988, when
Erich Bretthauer,
AA for ORD, went to
Poland to plan
research projects
under the U.S./
Polish Science and
Technology Agree-
ment. When he
returned, he asked
for volunteers from
ORD laboratories in
Cincinnati, Las
Vegas and RTP to
evaluate Poland's systems for dealing with air and
water pollution and solid waste.
We responded without hesitation. And when we
got there, later in 1988, we established relationships
with air quality experts in Poland that turned out to
be invaluable when President Bush announced a plan
to give Poland $15 million in environmental aid.
Since we knew by then what the country needed in
terms of monitoring technology, we were able to
move quickly to implement the air portion of the aid
project: a state-of-the-art network for Krakow that
measures air pollutants and concentration levels
throughout the year. In only 13 months, we bought
and tested the equipment, shipped it to Poland, and
trained the people to operate the entire network.
We still have much work left to do. But we made a
lot of friends in Poland and we carried out an impor-
tant segment of the project from beginning to end.
The recognition we've been given has been great, but
the experience itself was the real reward.
EPA team celebrates project completion with American
and Polish officials
Cartoon contributed by Tom Ward, OHHM
F.PAhSight • March 1992
-------
Calendar
M
W
T
Women's
History
Month
see page 3
1
8
15
22
29
2
9
3
Interior Dept
established 1849
4
"All Hands"
Meeting with
Bill Reilly,
Region 6
March 9-12:
8th Annual Conference on Statistics
(Contact. John War
16
23
ren, OPPE, FTS-260
17
#
March 23-25: EPA's Human Resources
Council Mtg. (Cont
ORD, FTS-260-74*
act. Linda Smith,
55)
31
March 29-Apnl 2:
National Volunteer Water Monitoring Conference
(Contact: Alice Mayio, OW, FTS-260-7018)
2683)
18
EPA's Awards
Board Meeting
25
5
12
19
6
13
First Anniversary
US/Canada Air
Quality Agreement
20
Spring's here!
March 25-27.
EPA's Natl. Wome
(Contact: Dommiqi
n in Science and Engu
ic Lueckenhoff, Regio
leering (WISE) Mtg.
n3,FTS-597~6527)
7
14
21
28
1992 - "Year of the Gulf of Mexico" (Public Law 102-178, Dec. 18, 1991)
1992 - "Year of
Bush, Octob
Clean Water" 0o
er 12, 1990)
mt Resolution of Con
rress and President
They're Ba ... ack!
April is the month for Mid-Year Performance Reviews
EPA at a Glance
(as of October 1991)
./ 49% of EPA's permanent workforce are women
EPA Female Employees by Occupation
95%
Women
100 -
0
£
0
3
— •
£ •
—
o
*o
c
03
0
1
0 -
/
'//fy''
'/sstf1
yyy/y/ 54<>/0
yfffl/j' Women 47%
^f//S f^f^'jX A ->no
W//S ^^/X^Bp/^X/^J w ° ^°'/0 25%
XX%? '///^-S^K/ft^^/-^^/^^ Women
*s/2ss/ iW^^^BK^/^MK^^'^^Kx^xflb^X'X^B
wiw v/^^lK^/^0lK^'''^il^^^lK''^''^m
ySs'/SS 'f%KwGw'//JwGff^fflryj%f/wrYtfMWT
Clerical Environ Attorneys Scientists Managers Engineers
Workfoice Protection
Specialists
EPA InBight
Bill Reilly
Administrator
Hank Habicht
Deputy Administrator
Lew Crampton
/L4, Communications,
Education, and Publn Affairs
Charlie Osolin
Director,
Editorial Sen'tces Division
Kym Burke
Erf/ftw-
Bob Drummond
Field Editoi (Feb-Apr 1992)
ERL/Diiluth
EDITORIAL BOARD
Lah/I'icld Offiin
Elaine Sarnvell, RTP/HERL
Gloria Koch, RTP/AREAL
Pat Sharpe, RTPA\EERL
Bob Rvans, Athens
Carroll V\'ills, NKIC:
Nonna C>ase, Cx>nalhs
Mike (Truenteld, Fdison
Tom Osberg, Env. Photo
Patricia Wunder, 1A7EMSL
Patti C.ooke, Cincinnati
Tnid\ Oln'er, Stenms
Boh Drummond, Duluth
Jan Prager, Narragansett
Bcttv Jackson, (nilf Breeze
William Witson, CJulf of Me\.
Regions
Frank Mclntyre, Region 1
Marilyn Qumones, Region 2
Carolyn Szumal, Region 3
Norman Black, Region 4
John Rapsys, Region 5
Linda Thompson, Region 6
Rowena Michaels, Region 7
Linda Adams, Region 8
John Duff, Region 9
Jean Baker, Region 10
Headquarters
Betty Wonkovich, AO
Karen Smith, OAR
Kathy Hutson, OARM
Diana White, OCLA
Rosa Morales', OCR
Bill Frank, OE
Wanda Ford, OEX
Craig Annear, OGC
Dale Medeans, OIA
Tom Maloney, OIG
Edgar Thornton, OPPF.
Tom Kean, OPPTS
Mary Wigginton, ORD
Lew Kerestesy, OROSLR
Scott McMur'ray, OSWER
Mary Lou Soscia, OW
DESIGN/EDITORIAL
SERVICES
lose A. Gonzalez, OARM
Steve Delaney, OCEPA
Gilah Langner
Free Hand Press
EPAlnSight • March 1992
------- |