80 Nu = A.Re °-34.Pr °-5 (10) For the desorption of hydrogen sulphide at Re< 80 Nu = A.Re. O-5*8 .Pr 0-5 (n) The value of coefficient A for the desorption of carbon sulphide for the term, Re < 80, is equal to 2.3 in vacuum 600mm Hg and 2 mm in vacuum from 200 to 0. For the desorption of hydrogen sulphide they are equal to 0.7 in vacuum 600 Hg and 0.6 in vacuum from 200 to 0. The A values are also defined for the terms when Re ) 80. The degassing rate of various types of wastewaters is generally 98-99 per cent (the residual content of the volatile component is 0.4 - 1.5 mg/1). In their case the post-treatment of wastewaters from volatile components is not required. In the course of degassing at normal 54
-------
pressure the wastewater saturation with air oxygen takes
place in the apparatus that is very significant.
   The treatment cost of I cu.m. of wastewater (without
considering the utilization  of valuable matters and the
decrease of the BOD value) in the apparatus, operating
in vacuum, is I copeck, but  at normal pressure it  is 5
copecks. The given cost may be considerably reduced, if
the volatile components are the valuable products.

Desorption in the spraying apparatus

   The  hollow apparatus  similar to the  nozzle-type
desorber  is   proposed   for  removing  the  volatile
components from the wastewaters by the liquid spraying
process. The desorption in the hollow spraying apparatus
is realized  at the  expense  of diffusion  of volatile
components through the surface of drops at  their fall, as
well as partially, at  the expense of the false bottom
operation as  a fall-through plate, and insignificantly, at
water flow through the inside surface of desorbers.  The
height  of drops fall (up to  the false bottom) is 4 m. For
liquid spraying various types  of nozzles with the 10 mm
outlet opening are used. The hollow desorbers operate at
the spraying density 12-120 cu.m/sq.m.hr.
   When defining the contact surface  of phases while
spraying the  wastewater with the used nozzles (with the
10  mm Cutlet opening) it is assumed that  the average
diametejKjof drops is equal, to 1.5 mm. The drop velocity
of such a drop is  4.5 m/sec., that significantly exceeds
the air velocity at the counter current for the given cases
of treatment wastes in the desorber.
   Using the known formula for the definition of the
contact surface of the  phases  a =  6 /Wk.d cp  and
substituting the accepted values in it, we shall obtain for
the  discussed   cases  of  wastewater  treatment  the
following:
                    1000 M

                    1.125
where  a - unit contact  surface of phases in I cu.m. of
hollow spraying apparatus;

     H - spraying density, cu.m/sq.m.sec.

   The desorber operation results show that the achieved
rate of water treatment is 80-85 per cent, but in some
cases it is up to 92%.
   The mass  transfer factor is inversely proportional to
the spraying  density. It remains practically constant at
air consumption more than 800 cu.m./sq.m.hr. (the unit
consumption is about 30). When feeding the waste liquid
through the perforated pipeline (instead of nozzles) the
treatment effect is reduced in 10-15 per cent.
   The Kx coefficient is dependent on the vacuum value.
It is also increased at the ejector air inlet to the pipeline
ahead  of the  nozzle.  The  main amount of volatile
components (up to 70-80 per cent) is removed from the
Applicat:
LJ
eas

r~
i

.on field of various type degassors

OfPT*











hollow spraying, normal pressure
"worlc * um^ opt • * 02
K^ = 0.00035


1
hollow, spraying, vacuum = 600 mm Hg
H work =I*7 m« v unit opt=I0' nO2r°'ali
K2 =0.0004


barbotage, normal pressure
Hsfe =I*' m5 vunit opt =1°: hox=°-
K~ = O.OOIIj



barbotage, vacuum = 600 mm Hg i
Hgt = I m; Vunit opt = 5; hox = 0.22; K^ = 0.002?;






With nozzle of Eashig's rings; normal
^nozzle = I m; Yunj-h opt = 10; h-^. =0.
KT =0.0023



With the nozzle of Eashig's rings; vacuum = 600 rnnHg;
Hnozzle = I m; V viD±t opt = 3; h^ = 0.2; K^.004;








64;



pressure
34;

-?o° 2 4 6 s fa' 2 4
Concentration. CS2, mg/1


Liquic
gas.CvGL'10

£ 8 fo £
.,GI
Eg/

                                                       55

-------
wastewater when the drops are falling at the distance of
0.7-1 m from the nozzle.
   The optimum  pressure ahead of the nozzle is a liquid
head equal to 0.7 -1 atm. On the basis of generalization
of the operation data on the plant-scale and full-scale
hollow spraying-type apparatus the criterion equation is
obtained for trie desorption  process of carbon sulphide
from wastewaters.
where A - for vacuum 600 m. Hg - 400, for vacuum 200
mm Hg - 250, for normal pressure - 200 mm Hg. In the
criteria  of Nussolt and Reynolds average drop diameter
is accepted for the typical dimension. Since the lower
concentrated mixture is formed in the spraying desorber
the cost of  valuable  components as returned to the
manufacture  will  be higher than for the nozzle-type and
the barbotage-type apparatus.
   When generalizing  the  performance  results  of the
nozzle-type  desorbers of Rashig's rings with barbotage
layer  of liquid  and  hollow  sprayer-type  ones, it  is
necessary to  note that these  data allow to compare the
discussed desorbers as to the achieved efficiency of the
wastewater disinfection, they afford the opportunity to
perform the process design  of these facilities  and to
recommend   them  for wastewater  treatment  practice
from   various   industries.   In the   above-mentioned
desorbers the waste liquid depth (under otherwise equal
conditions)   is clearly shown  in  the  figure  2.  The
selection  of the  wastewater treatment  process  is
performed  depending  on the local  conditions.  The
discussed methods of desorption and  designing appara-
tuses  have  recently found the application in chemical,
pulp  and  paper and  food  industries. The schematic
diagram of one of industrial  installations is given in the
figure 3. The  performance of this  installation  provides
for the high-rate treatment of water and vapour and gas
mixture. In addition  the  return of valuable substances
takes place.
   The application field of various types of desorbers is
being expanded with the increase of requirements to the
sanitary protection of waters and atmosphere from gas
emission contaminations.

List of inscriptions to figures

Figure I. Barbotage-type  degassor:  1,4 - water supply
pipeline; 2  - spraying nozzles; 3 - barbotage liquid layer;
5 - removable  barbotage unit; 6 - drop removing layer; 7
-   pipeline  for vapour  and  gas mixture  outlet;  8  -
explosion-proof  device; 9 - pipeline for  treated water
outlet; 10 - vat for separation micro bubbles from liquid;
I-I3  -  Pipelines for outlet  from  the  apparatus;  12  -
Hydiaulic vat.

Figure 2.  Application field  of various type degassors.
Spraying density    = 12 cu.m/sq.m.hr, t = 60°C; spray-
ing device  -  controllable  cylindrical  nozzle (C.C.N.);
concentration  of carbon sulphide in the vapour and gas
mixture CVGM  =100 mg/1; mass  transfer factor = Kx
kilomole/sq.m.sec; concentration of carbon sulphide in
water, Cj - at  the apparatus inlet, €2 - at the apparatus
outlet;  H nozzle  -  height  of the  nozzle, hox -  unit
                      ito viin-
      wastewatfir     Tt~l.-l.ioi
       	~->	L_syj' f;snij
               Shematic diagram of industrial desorption  installation
                                                       56

-------
transfer height; U unit opt. - unit air consumption.

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of industrial installation for
desorption  of carbon  sulphide,  hydrogen sulphide with
carbon sulphide recovery.

I. Water intake tank;  2 - pump; 3  - heat exchanger; 4 -
degassor; 5 - hydraulic gate valve (barometric vat); 6 -
cooler; 7 -  condensate collector; 8 -  vacuum pump; 9 -
Adsorber for hydrogen sulphide; 10  - adsorber for carbon
sulphide;
2. Hollow, spraying, vacuum = 600 mm  Hg H work =
   1.7 m; V unit opt. =  10; hox = 0.81; Kx = 0.004
3. barbotage, normal pressure H s^ = 1.5 m; V unit opt.
   = 10; hox = 0.64; Kx = 0.0011
4. barbotage, vacuum = 600 mm  Hg Hst  = I m; V unit
   opt. = 5; hox = 0.22; Kx = 0.0027;
5. With nozzle  of Rashigs rings, normal pressure H
   nozzle = 1  m; V  unit opt.  = 10; hox  = 0.34; Kx =
   0.0023
6. With the nozzle of  Rashig's rings; vacuum = 60 mm
   Hg; H nozzle = I m; V unit opt. = 3; hox = 0.2; Kx =
   0.004;
                                                      57

-------
     DESIGN   OF   FACILITIES   FOR   PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF RAW WASTEWATER
                          Presented by Gordon L. Gulp at Technology Transfer Seminars
                          Sponsored   by   the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency.
INTRODUCTION
The various approaches  to physical-chemical treatment
of raw wastewater as described by other speakers in this
session, all  involve  the use of the  same basic unit
processes  of coagulation and settling for  removal  of
suspended solids and, in  some cases, phosphorus; the use
of filtration for further removals of suspended solids and
phosphorus;  and carbon  adsorption  for removal  of
soluble organics.

This paper will discuss: typical design parameters for the
unit processes involved in physical-chemical treatment of
raw wastes; how the  design engineer may  determine the
design criteria best suited for a given wastewater; criteria
being  used for full-scale  plants; and the results obtained
in studies in several locales.

PLANT PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS

For purposes  of providing an illustrative example for
discussion  of  design considerations,  the  raw  waste
characteristics and effluent requirements shown in Table
1 have been assumed. The effluent standards cannot be
met  with secondary   treatment  alone  as  chemical
coagulation would be required to meet the  phosphorus
standards  and, at least, filtration of a secondary effluent
to meet  the  BOD and  SS requirements.  On the other
hand, the effluent standards are not so stringent to know
for certain that physical-chemical  techniques  must be
used in series with  biological treatment. Therefore, a
design engineer faced with the above situation should
conduct  the  necessary tests  to determine if the above
standards  could be met  by physical-chemical treatment
alone, and if so, what design criteria should be used. The
unit processes involved  are  proven to the  degree that
extensive, on-site pilot tests  are not necessary for most
wastewaters  and  design criteria  can  be obtained in
laboratory tests. Of course, if time and funds permit, an

                       TABLE 1

   WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFLUENT
              QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
 BOD
 COD
 Suspended Solids
 Hardness, as CaCOj
 Phosphorus
 Alkalinity
Influent,
 Average
(mg/1)

   180
   520
   250
   150
   11.5
   220
   Effluent,
   weekly
Average (mg/1)

     15
     30
     10
                               on-site pilot test over several months will permit an even
                               more accurate determination of design criteria under a
                               wider  variety of operating conditions. Should  on-site
                               pilot studies  be  considered, the scale of the equipment
                               can  be tailored  to  meet  the  individual needs  of  the
                               project.  Small diameter  filters and  carbon  columns
                               (about 6-inch diameter) are adequate for column studies
                               and  can often be obtained  from suppliers of carbon and
                               filter manufacturers  on a loan or rental basis. Pilot
                               clarifiers of 6-10 feet in diameter can usually be rented
                               from clarifier manufacturers. In a like  manner, pilot
                               sludge thickening and dewatering equipment can also be
                               rented. The overall cost of pilot studies will vary widely
                               depending  upon  the extent of the data collected. A
                               meaningful study should  span several months if any
                               seasonal  variations   in  raw  wastewater  quality  are
                               anticipated.  Although pilot  studies   unquestionably
                               provide a firmer basis of design, the author's experiences
                               indicate  that,  except in  unusual  circumstances,  the
                               design criteria for the physical-chemical unit  processes
                               undei  consideration  here  can  be determined with
                               suitable accuracy in  properly conducted laboratory tests
                               on representative raw waste samples.
PRELIMINARY DATA COLLECTION

In order to proceed with the design on a rational basis, a
characterization of  the raw  wastewater in terms of its
amenability  to physical-chemical  treatment must be
made. The following description of tests on wastewater
illustrates  techniques which may be used. Four 24-hour
composite samples collected  during four different weeks
are used in the example.

The  goals of  these  tests are to answer  the  following
major questions which must be  answered before the
design can proceed:

•  What is the best  coagulant?
•  How much sludge is produced?
•  How well does the sludge dewater?
•  Is coagulant recovery practical?
•  What is the nonadsorbable fraction of organics in the
   raw wastewater?
•  How  much carbon contact  time  will be required?
•  What effluent quality can be  expected?
SELECTION OF COAGULANT

There are four major classes of coagulants which may be
considered singularly or in combination:
                                                      58

-------
1. Polymers.  Some investigators have reported success-
ful coagulation of raw sewage with polymers alone. The
author has examined polymers as the primary coagulant
on many wastewaters without finding them economic-
ally attractive when compared to the inorganic coagu-
lants available. The cost of polymers is $l-$2 per pound.
When used as the primary coagulant, polymers do not
provide phosphorus removal.  One  of the following
inorganic coagulants is required if phosphorus removal is
of concern.  Polymers used  in conjunction with an
inorganic coagulant are effective settling and filtration
aids.

2. Iron Salts. Ferric chloride or ferric sulfate may be
used for both suspended solids and phosphorus removal.
Experience has shown that efficient phosphorus removal
requires the stoichiometric amount of iron (1.8 mg/1 Fe
per mg/1 of P) to be supplemented by at least  10 mg/1
of iron for hydroxide formation. Typically, 15-30 mg/1
as Fe  is required to provide  phosphorus reductions of
85-90 per cent. When considering iron for coagulation of
raw wastes, it must be remembered that in an anaerobic
environment,  as  may be encountered in a  downstream
carbon column, iron sulfide may be formed. This  black
precipitate  is obviously  not  desirable  in the  final
effluent.

3. Aluminum Salts. Both aluminum  sulfate (alum) and
sodium aluminate have been used for  coagulation of
wastewaters.  Alum  is generally a much more effective
coagulant  than   sodium  aluminate.  Alum  doses of
200-300 mg/1 are typically required for 85-90  percent
phosphorus removal (an aluminum to phosphorus ratio
of 2-3). Disadvantages of both the iron and aluminum
salts are (1) both form gelatinous hydroxide floes which
are difficult to dewater in many cases; (2) no techniques
are available  for  recovery and reuse of the coagulant
when  phosphorus removal is required;  and (3) large
amounts of ions  (chlorides or sulfates) are added to the
wastewater.

4. Lime. Lime has  been  successfully used in several
locales  for  wastewater  coagulation  and  phosphorus
removal.  The amount of lime required is independent of
the  amount  of  phosphorus  present; rather,  it  is a
function  of  the wastewater  alkalinity and  hardness.
When the pH  reaches 9.5 due to the addition of lime, the
orthophosphate  is converted  to an  insoluble form. In
some  cases,  additional  quantities  of  lime  may be
required  to form a readily settable floe. Lime has been
recalcined  and  reused  in  some cases  when  used to
coagulate secondary effluent. However,  as will be illus-
trated later,  recalcining and reuse may often  not be
practical  when it is used to coagulate raw  wastewaters
due to the  large  amount of inert materials present  in the
combined raw sewage-chemical sludges. In any case, lime
sludges usually dewater more readily than those resulting
from iron or aluminum coagulation.
The  choice  of coagulant can usually be  made  rather
quickly by laboratory jar tests. The following illustrative
example is based on data collected on a raw wastewater
from a community in the Midwest.

In the  technique used,  six one-liter  samples are dosed
with the  coagulants  being studied while being rapidly
mixed  with a jar test device. In this example, 0.5 mg/1 of
an anionic polymer  (nopcofloc 930, manufactured by
Diamond  Shamrock) was added as  a  settling  aid.
Following a  60-second rapid mix, the samples are slowly
mixed  for about 5 minutes. These are then allowed to
stand quiecently to permit settling of the floe. Samples
of the  supernatant are then obtained with a pipette from
a point just  below the liquid surface in  the jar. This is
done to avoid including  any of the floating solids which
are invariably found in raw  sewage. This supernatant
sample  is then  analyzed  for  turbidity,  pH, hardness
(when  lime is used as a coagulant), and  phosphorus. A
portion of the remaining supernatant is filtered through
a Whatman No. 2 filter paper. The filtrate is analyzed for
turbidity,  phosphorus,  and in some  cases, TOC, COD,
BOD and  suspended  solids. Past experience has shown
that  the filtrate  quality  obtained  with this filter paper
will be  about the same  as that which will be achieved
with a mixed-media filter.
Lime Coagulation

By plotting the jar test data, it was determined that the
lime dosages required to achieve  a filtrate  phosphorus
concentration of one mg/I were as follows:

         Sample No. 1 = 132 mg/1 as Ca(OH)2
         Sample No. 2 = 100 mg/1 as Ca(OH)2
         Sample No. 3 = 110 mg/1 as Ca(OH)2
         Sample No. 4 = 130 mg/1 as Ca(OH)2

One  mg/1 phosphorus was achieved at a pH of 9.1-9.5.
The  lime  dosage  required for optimum solids removal
varied from 100-130 mg/1. In general, a somewhat higher
dose of lime  was required for optimum solids removal
than was required for phosphorus  removal. A lime dose
of 200 mg/1 achieved adequate solids removal for all four
samples  and this dose will  be  used  in  subsequent
calculation of the cost of lime coagulation.

Suspended solids analyses showed that settled superna-
tant contained less than 5 mg/1 suspended solids at this
dose and the filtered supernatant generally contained no
measurable suspended solids.  A lime  dose of 200 mg/1
results  in an effluent phosphorus  concentration  of
0.07-0.26 mg/1  and a  pH of 9.6-10.1. The  lime  and
polymer dosage  produced a rapidly  settling floe, as it
does in most wastewaters.
                                                      59

-------
Alum Coagulation

The  alum  dosages  required  to  achieve  a  filtrate
phosphorus  concentration of one mg/1 were as follows:

              Sample No. 1 = 120 mg/1
              Sample No. 2= 153 mg/1
              Sample No. 3 = 165 mg/1
              Sample No. 4= 150 mg/1

The  pH  was  reduced  to 6.7-7.1  by the above  alum
dosages.

Adequate solids removal was achieved  at  alum doses
equal to  or less  than  that  required for  phosphorus
removal.

Iron Coagulation

The  ferric chloride dosages required to achieve a filtrate
phosphorus  concentration of one mg/1 were as follows:

            Sample No. 1 = 20 mg/1 as Fe
            Sample No. 3 = 27 mg/1 as Fe
            Sample No. 4 = 23 mg/1 as Fe

The  required   Fe/P ratios  were  2.7,  2.4,  and 2.5
respectively.  It  appeared that the dose  required for
phosphorus removal would equal or exceed that required
for solids removal.

Comparison  of Coagulant Costs

The  cost  of  the various coagulants at  the plant site is as
follows:

              Lime = $16.75/ton of CaO
                  Alum = $70/ton
     Ferric Chloride = $90/ton (or $262/ton of Fe)

The  estimated costs for coagulation with the following
doses are as follows:

       200 mg/1 lime [as Ca(OH)2] =  $10.60/mg
             160 mg/1 alum = $46.50/mg
               23mg/lFe = $25.10/mg

It is apparent that lime is the lowest cost coagulant, even
when the lime  dosage involved reduces the phosphorus
to less than 0.3 mg/1.

Of  course,  the total economic  comparison must also
include the  relative cost of  sludge disposal associated
with each coagulant. Nearly always the lime sludges may
be  disposed of at significantly lower costs than the
sludges resulting from either  alum or iron coagulation.
Thus, in  the above example, there is little doubt that
lime will remain the most economical coagulant when
sludge disposal costs are included.

The general dewatering characteristics of the sludge may
be  determined by laboratory tests. A  100 ml sludge
sample is dewatered with a Whatman No. 2 filter paper
in  a  Buchner  funnel  with  laboratory  vacuum.  The
volume  of filtrate versus time  is  then plotted  and
compared to similar data  for sludges for  which field
experience has  also been obtained. Figure 1 presents an
example  comparison  which shows that  the  sludges
resulting from coagulation of this wastewater dewatered
even more  readily in the  lab than did another sludge
which later proved to dewater very well in a centrifuge.
Thus, the dewatering of the sludge does not appear to be
a limiting factor in this case.

It  is  difficult to  obtain  an  accurate  gravimetric
measurement of sludge  quantities in a  laboratory test
due to loss of solids during decanting, etc. However, it is
possible to estimate the quantities of lime  sludge from
the chemistry involved and the data collected from the
jar  tests. As shown in Table  2, about 4,050 pounds of
solids per million gallons would be expected with a lime
dose  of 200  mg/1. Following  incineration,  the  ash
quantities would be about 2,165 pounds  per million
gallons.

With this information, it is then possible to determine
the feasibility of recalcining and reusing the lime. From
Table 2, it is  apparent that if one were to recycle all of
820 pounds  of the  lime  recovered per mg, that  one
would   also  recycle  1,345  pounds of inert  ashes.
Assuming that  a 20 percent blowdown  were practiced,
one would  recycle 670 pounds lime and 1,080 pounds
inerts. After the second cycle, there would not be 1,345
+  1,080  pounds of inerts in the  furnace discharge or
2,425 pounds of inerts. Table 3 presents an illustrative
calculation  of the buildup of inerts through  11  cycles
with 20 percent blowdown of the furnace product.

Eventually,  one  will be  dewatering and  incinerating
about 6,500 pounds of inerts per mg in order to recover
only 670 pounds  of  lime. The solids handling system
would have to be sized for a solids load corresponding to
a nonvolatile  fraction of about 7,300 pounds/mg rather
than the 2,165 pounds/mg  if the sludge  was merely
incinerated and thrown away. One would  be spending
far more to recover the lime than it would  be worth. A
higher  blowdown  rate still does  not make recalcining
practical in this example. It is far cheaper to use the lime
once and dispose of the sludge. Until a means is available
for very efficient separation of lime from the inerts in
the combined raw sewage-chemical  sludge,  lime recycle
will often not be practical when coagulating raw sewage
unless very high lime doses are involved. Envirotech is
developing a dry classification technique for  this purpose
                                                      60

-------
                                                    300018
                                       i 3 tin old
S3"wwvs soams iw ooi
       S3SV3 H108 Nl
OE6 301d03dON I/DIM S'O
  (HO)
           091
   wmv 1/ow 091
      ISON033S) 3WU
     )02  	OS1
                                                                001
                                                                           OS
                                             •30ndlblN33
                                    NI aiavasivwaa Aiiov3a
                                     Q3AOUd HOIHM I/DIM 002
                                    HUM Q31WinOVOO 30.SVAA
                                             3oams awn
                                                                                      OS
                                                                                      oo
                                                                                      Oi
                                                                                      08
                                                                                      06
                                                                                      001
                                        TABLE 2
                         ESTIMATE OF LIME SLUDGE QUANTITIES
          Raw Sewage Suspended Solids =250 mg/1
          Raw Sewage PO4 = 34.5 mg/1
          Add 200 mg/1 lime as Ca(OH)2 or 108 mg/1 Ca
          Assume all 250 mg/1 raw sewage SS removed
          Assume lime reacts with PC>4 to form
                 Ca5(OH)   (P04)3
          Weight of Ca5(OH)  (PO4)3 formed =
                 Ca5(OH)   (P04)3m.w. x Po  conc = 502
                      (OP4)3 m.w.
          Raw Hardness           =

          Treated Hardness        =
          Ca lost in effluent        =

          CainCa5(OH)  (PO4)3 =

          Ca in CaCO3 sludge      =
          Quantity of CaCO3      =
             285
                  x 34.5 = 61 mg/1
x  (185-150)   =   14 mg/1
150 mg/1 as CaCO3 [as measured on Sample No. 4
                   with 200 mg/1 Ca(OH)2]
185 mg/1 asCaCO3
 40
100
200
502
108
100
 40
x  61 mg/1

-  (24+ 14)
x  70
=   24 mg/1

=   70 mg/1
=  175 mg/1
          Sludge Composition
            Raw sewage Solids  = 250 mg/1
            Ca5(OH)   (PO4)3  =  61 mg/1
            CaCO3            = 175 mg/1
     2080 Ibs/mg   x   .4
      5101bs/mg   x 1.0
     1460 Ibs/mg   x  .56
     4050 Ibs/mg
                                  835 Ibs/mg
                                  510 Ibs/mg
                                  820 Ibs/mg
                                 2165 Ibs/mg
                                           61

-------
                      TABLE 3
EFFECT OF RECYCLING RECALCINED MATERIALS
                   Pounds per Million Gallons

                               Recycled Material
            Furnace Discharge   with 20% Slowdown
 Cycle No.     Lime    Inerts
     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
    10
    11
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
1345
2425
3285
3975
4525
4965
5315
5595
5825
6005
6145
Lime

 670
 670
 670
 670
 670
 670
 670
 670
 670
 670
 670
Inerts

 1080
 1940
 2630
 3180
 3620
 3970
 4250
 4480
 4660
 4800
 4915
Assumes 100% calcium recovery from sludge and makeup
lime to maintain 200 mg/1 lime dose

but no operational data are yet available. A plant under
construction in Contra Costa, California will make use of
this  dry  classification  technique  on sludges  resulting
from lime coagulation of raw sewage.

CARBON ADSORPTION

There are organics (i.e., sugars) which may be readily
biodegradable but  which  are difficult to adsorb on
carbon. The  amount  of these nonadsorbable  materials
will  vary greatly from wastewater to  wastewater and
their presence will be the governing factor concerning
the quality of effluent which  can be achieved by carbon
adsorption.  The  same physical-chemical process  may
produce a BOD of 10 mg/1 in one locale and 30 mg/1 in
another  due  to  this  fact. The ability to remove the
soluble organics may be measured in the laboratory by
two methods.        /

One of these methods is a batch process in  a beaker
while  the  other  is a  flow-through,  carbon column
experiment. In the first case, the raw sewage is contacted
with 1,000 mg/1 of Aqua Nuchar A, a powdered carbon,
for  one  hour. Alternately, a sample  of  the granular
carbon under consideration may be ground and applied
to the sample. The sample is then coagulated, settled and
the  supernatant filtered through  Whatman No. 2  filter
paper prior  to analysis. Past work done with powdered
carbon indicates that an Aqua Nuchar dose of 600 mg/1
and a contact time of five minutes is generally adequate
for removal of all adsorbable  organics.  Thus, the above
conditions insure that  all adsorbable materials are, in
fact, removed. The above technique is a quick method of
determining the nonadsorbable fraction of organics. The
isotherm technique described  by other speakers in this
session will provide more information.

The  column  test may  be  conducted  using Calgon
Filtrasorb 400  carbon  or equivalent in  five %-inch
diameter columns in series. The columns are sized  so
that  cumulative contact times  of 7.5,  15, 30,45 and 60
minutes  are  provided  at the  end of the  respective
columns.  Four  to  five  gallons  of raw sewage  are
coagulated  with  either  lime  or  alum,   settled,  the
supernatant decanted (the pH adjusted to 7 when lime is
used), and the clarified  wastewater pumped through the
columns. This quantity  of sewage  will provide several
days of  operation in columns  of  this  size.  The tests
should be continued as long  as possible  to accurately
determine the effects of biological  activity. The sludge
should be saved for analysis. The results from these small
columns have been found by the author to be  consistent
with those obtained  in larger units.  For example, in one
study spanning several  months, the results concerning
contact time from small laboratory  columns in the first
four  weeks  of  the  study were essentially  the  same
observed from both 6-inch diameter and 3-foot diameter
columns operated over several months.

The  reasons   for  preferably  conducting  both  the
powdered carbon and column tests are  to determine if
the effluent from the columns could be lower in BOD
than that achieved  by adsorption alone  due to  the
biological growth in a column and to determine  the
effects of contact time on column performance.

Powdered Carbon Results

The  effluent quality achieved by the  powdered carbon
technique above  should  closely represent  the  non-
adsorbable fraction of the organics contained  in the raw
waste  sample  tested. The results  obtained  with  the
wastewater in question are as follows:

The three parameters show similar trends from sample to
sample, with the fourth sample containing  substantially
less nonadsorbable organics than Samples 2 and 3 and
somewhat less than  Sample 1. It appears that the BOD
of 2 mg/1 measured for  Sample 4 may be low as  the
COD/BOD  ratio is  considerably out  of line with  the
other samples. The COD appears valid as the COD/TOC
ratio compares closely with the other samples. However,
it is  possible that there was a change in the nature of the
unadsorbable  organics so that, in fact, a smaller portion
was biodegradable.

The  nonadsorbable BOD ranged from  2-18 mg/1 with an
average of 12.2 mg/1  for the four samples.
                                                     62

-------
Column Tests

Figures  2 and 3 summarize the data collected from the
laboratory columns. As can be seen from the figures, the
benefits achieved  by contact times greater than  30
minutes are slight. The  carbon column  effluent  BOD
values after 60 minutes contact ranged from 5 to  15
mg/1 and averaged 11.0 mg/1. The BOD samples collected
at a 30-minute contact time averaged 12.5 mg/1.

An estimate of the required carbon dosage can be made
by  assuming  that  carbon will   be withdrawn   for
regeneration  when  the carbon loading is 0.5 pounds of
COD removed per pound of carbon. This loading  has
20
10
0
Ol
kt_ ORGANIC CARBON
o S
H
O
0
20

10
0
c

DAY 1
"\ ;


DAY 2
\
°

. °v DAY 3
o
X. •;
o 	
1 I
20 40 6C
CARBON DETENTION TIME. WIN.
30
20
10
0
D>
M. ORGANIC CARBON
S JJ
O
H
0
20

10
0
(

\ DAY 8
• -J

DAY 10
v
^o

-\ DAY 14
\^\
^^X ^v
_ \v. °-~-__^
DAY 22 X^^^ ^ ^£







) 20 40 60
CARBON DETENTION TIME. WIN.
FIGURE 2
PILOT CARBON COLUMN DATA
                                                    63

-------
                                             CARBOK CONTACT TIME, MINUTES
                                                    FIGURE 3

                                             PILOT CARBON COLUMN DATA
been  achieved  in  several studies.  An  average  soluble
influent  COD  of 86 mg/1 was  achieved with  lime
clarification in  the four series of jar  tests. The  average
COD achieved in the four powdered carbon tests was 23
mg/1  and averaged 24 mg/1  after 30 minutes contact in
the columns. Thus, an average COD removal of about 62
mg/1   would  be  expected from   these  tests,  The
corresponding  carbon  dosage  is  1,030 pounds/mg.
Carbon dosages calculated from short-term laboratory
column  tests  are  usually conservatively   high,  as
biological action  usually  results in greater  permissible
loadings in a continuous, plant scale operation.

PROCESS DESIGN

The purpose of this  section is to  discuss those design
criteria necessary for plant design. Figure 4 illustrates
the flow  sheet upon  which the following discussion is
based.

Flow

Both the average and peak flows are of  concern. In a
physical-chemical plant, there is a substantial volume of
flow  recycled  to the  head  of the  plant  from   the
following major  sources: (1) furnace scrubber under-
flow, (2) filter  and activated carbon backwash flows, (3)
sludge thickener  overflow,  and (4)  sludge dewatering
filtrate or centrate. For example, a 15 mgd average flow
rate  may  be associated with a peak hourly rate of 30
mgd.  To  these  values must be added the volume of
recycle streams.  If these recycle streams total 3.5 mgd in
the above example, then the design hydraulic flow rates
become 18.5 mgd average and 33.5 mgd peak hour.

Preliminary Treatment

Comminution and grit  removal facilities designed in
accordance  with  standard sewage  treatment  design
practices should  be provided.

Chemical Feed, Rapid Mix and Flocculation

These functions may all be carried out in accordance
with standard practices followed in the water treatment
field for years.

Proper rapid mixing is important to efficient utilization
of the coagulating chemicals.  The use of a mechanical
rapid mixing  device  in  the basins with a total of 2
minutes   detention   time   of  the  average   flow  is
recommended. When  using lime as coagulant, scaling of
the  mixer shaft will occur and  may cause  excessive
bearing wear if not  cleaned  regularly.  In any case,
provision  of two parallel rapid mixing units each with a
nominal capacity of one-half the design flow is prudent
to provide flexibility in operation. Should one mixing
unit  be down for repair, the entire flow  can be passed
                                                      64

-------








J






r





0

RAW ^
SEWAGE

Q PEAK HOUR!








COMMINUTION
AND
GRIT REMOVAL









[A] DESIGN FLOW BASED ON



[*•

c








•}








RAPID MIX
AND
FLOCCULATION


t

COAGULANT(S)




Q PEAK HOUR PLUS















(A)


SLL






DGE

L


Q RECYCLE




SURGE

BACKWASH WASTEW-ATERS
t 1
1 1
i i
i i
i i






RECAHBONATON
COAG USED)


CHLORINE

POND I81 IB)


ASH , ,


1 t I
-
SLUDGE
THICKENING
(OPTIONAL!
SLUDGE CARBON
~* DEWATERING * INCINERATION DEGENERATION
1 1 1 1
1 CENTRATE crfjimnpo SCRU3TER
OVERFLOW OR UNDER 'lO-V UNDERFLO* AND
FILTRATE UNULK LUA< CA-,CON WA£J WA-rERS
_i __* _J _t

FIGURE 4
ILLUSTRATIVE SCHEMATIC OF
A PHYSICAL - CHEMICAL TREATMENT PLANT
through the remaining basin which will still provide one
minute mixing with the above criteria.

A  mechanically  mixed  flocculator  with  15  minutes
detention is generally adequate for wastewaters. In many
cases, the flocculation  resulting from the large coagulant
doses  added  to  wastewaters  results  in  very  rapid
flocculation and  even shorter  detention times may be
feasible.  Provisions should be  made  to add up to one
mg/1  polymer at the rapid mix or at the flocculator inlet
or outlet or split among these points.

Clarifier Sizing

The critical design parameter is the peak hourly surface
overflow rate.  Gross carryover of solids can cause  the
downstream filter or adsorption processes to fail due to
excessive headloss which, in turn, will result in  a total
failure of the plant. Thus, it is of little consolation to
know the  clarifier will perform properly under average
flow  conditions only  to have  a  carryover  of excessive
solids during the peak hourly flow shut the entire plant
down. A maximum peak hourly rate of 1,400 gpd/ft^
for conventional horizontal or radial  flow  clarifiers is
recommended  when  using  lime  as  a  coagulant unless
pilot  tests  indicate that  other  rates should be used. A
maximum  average rate of 900 gpd/ft^ is recommended.
Whichever  of  these two criteria results in the larger
clarifier size should be  used.
Several  attempts have been made  to use upflow, sludge
blanket  type   clarifiers  on   coagulated  primary  or
secondary  effluents.  Difficulty  in  holding a  sludge
blanket  has  been  reported in every  case.  Successful
operation has been achieved with these units by lowering
the overflow  rate  to conventional clarifier rates and
eliminating  the  sludge  blanket, which in  essence,
converts the unit to  a conventional radial  flow basin.
The  instability of the sludge  blanket  or solids contact
units is due to  the organics found in the raw  sewage and
the wide variations in incoming flow. These units  have
been  most  successful  in treating   groundwaters  of
uniform composition at a constant flow rate.  The author
does not recommend their use  on  coagulated waste-
waters.
Provision should be made for recirculation of controlled
amounts of sludge  from the bottom of the clarifier to
the rapid mix  inlet. The high  pH of lime-treated water
will  form deposits of calcium  carbonate on structures
and in  pipelines which it contacts. Lime sludge suction
lines should  be  glass  lined to  facilitate cleaning.  Pro-
visions  must also be  made for regular cleaning of  all
other pipelines which carry the high pH effluent. Use of
the new  polyurethane cleaning pigs should  be  com-
patible  with the layout of the  pipelines.  Mechanical
sludge  collection equipment used  in lime settling basins
should  be  of the bottom  scraper type  rather  than the
vacuum pickup style because of the dense sludge to  be
handled.
                                                       65

-------
Recarbonation

lime  treatment of wastewaters for phosphorus removal
often  raises the pH to values of 10-11. At this pH, the
water  is  unstable  and  calcium  carbonate  floe  will
precipitate readily. This floe is very tenacious and would
encrust any downstream filters or carbon particles to a
serious degree. The pH may be lowered by injecting €62
gas obtained from the incinerator stack gases. Primary
recarbonation is used to reduce the pH from 11 to 9.3,
which is near  that of minimum solubility for calcium
carbonate. In domestic wastewater,  primary recarbon-
ation  to pH  =  9.3 results in the formation of a  heavy,
rapidly   settling  floe  which  is   principally  calcium
carbonate, although some phosphorus is also removed
from  solution  by adsorption on the floe. If sufficient
reaction time, usually about 15 minutes in cold water, is
allowed for the primary recarbonation reaction to go to
completion,  for  the  calcium carbonate floe does not
redissolve with  subsequent  further lowering of  pH in
secondary  recarbonation.  If lime is to be reclaimed by
recalcining and reused, this settled  primary recarbon-
ation  floe  is a rich source of calcium oxide, and may
represent as  much as one third of the total recoverable
lime.  If the pH were not reduced to less than about 8.8
before  application  to  the  filters  and  carbon  beds,
extensive deposition of calcium carbonate would occur
on  the  surface  of the  grains. This could reduce filter
efficiency,  and  could   also  drastically  reduce  the
adsorptive  capacity  of granular activated  carbon for
organics.  It  would produce rapid ash buildup  in the
carbon  pores  upon  regeneration  of the  carbon, and
would lead to early replacement of the carbon.

It is possible to  reduce the pH of a treated wastewater
from  11 to 7 or to any other desired value in one stage
of  recarbonation. Single-stage recarbonation eliminates
the need for the intermediate settling basin which  is used
with two-stage  systems. However, by applying sufficient
carbon  dioxide  in one step for the total pH reduction,
little, if any, calcium is  precipitated with the bulk of
calcium  remaining  in  solution,  thus  increasing the
calcium hardness of the finished water, and, in addition,
causing the loss of a large quantity of calcium carbonate
which could  otherwise be settled out, recalcined to lime,
and reused.  If lime  is to be reclaimed or  if calcium
reduction  in the effluent  is desired,  then two-stage
recarbonation  is required.   Otherwise,  single-stage re-
carbonation  may be  used with a  substantial savings  in
initial cost, and a reduction in the amount of lime sludge
to be handled.

In our example wastewater discussed earlier, there would
be  no need  for two-stage recarbonation because (1) no
reuse of lime is planned, (2) the phosphorus goals can be
achieved without the slight additional phosphorus which
may be provided by two-stage recarbonation, and  (3) the
low  lime dosage  required  does not add a significant
quantity of calcium to the effluent.

If two-stage recarbonation is being considered only for
the purposes of lime recovery, one should compare the
value of the lime recovered  against the cost of providing
two-stage recarbonation. Peak hourly overflow rates for
the  intermediate  clarifier  in  two-stage  recarbonation
should  not  exceed 1,400 gpd/ft^. Provision should be
made for polymer addition  to the intermediate clarifier
influent.

The  details of design for recarbonation systems may be
found in Advanced Wastewater Treatment.

Filtration

Whether or not  filtration is needed prior to  activated
carbon  adsorption is subject  to debate. There  is no
question that filtration  ahead of a downflow granular
carbon  adsorption bed will reduce the rate at which the
pores of the activated carbon become plugged with inert
materials. Also,  the  use  of an efficient filter permits
downstream use  of  upflow, packed carbon beds which
may  be operated in the  more efficient countercurrent
mode discussed later. The question is whether or not the
cost  of providing  the  filtration  exceeds the benefits
mentioned above. Only long-term  operating data from
plants using granular carbon  with and  without prior
filtration will answer this question. In the interim,  a
conseivative design will include filtration prior to carbon
adsorption. In addition to protecting carbon pores from
plugging by inerts, mixed media filtration also provides a
more efficient means  of solids removal than carbon
alone, resulting  in a higher effluent quality. Filtration
Equipment  is  available  which  will  provide simple,
reliable  and  automatic  operation.  Carbon  is  not  a
particularly  effective filter because it acts as basically a
surface  type filter  and as such, is  subject to all the
shortcomings  of  other  surface   filters  applied  to
wastewaters. Any high solids loading will blind a surface
type  filter in short order.  The  use  of dual media  or
mixed,  tri-media filters provides a much  more efficient
filtration device which  is capable of tolerating a  much
higher  solids  loading than  is  a  surface  type  filter. A
discussion of alternate  filtration devices and  a detailed
discussion  of filter  system design  may  be  found  in
Advanced Wastewater Treatment.

In instances where  an  upflow  expanded  bed carbon
contactor is used, the filter  may be located downstream
of the carbon column to remove the bacterial floe which
is flushed from the carbon.

It is desirable to  precede the filtration step with a flow
equalization pond so that the filters may be operated at
essentially a constant rate. Provisions should be made for
                                                       66

-------
a feed of polymer directly to the filter influent as a filter
aid.  Filter  effluent turbidity  and head loss should be
monitored  continuously with high filter head loss being
used to initiate an automated backwash program.

Granular Carbon Adsorption

Because  of the unproven  economics of recovery and
reuse of powdered carbon, the use of granular carbon is
the  only  current  practical   technique  available  for
removal  of   soluble  organics from  coagulated raw
wastewater. Chemical oxidation techniques are not yet
practical for  the large quantities of organics involved.
The major design decisions facing  the engineer  is the
selection of a contact time (30 minutes in the example
discussed earlier), what dose of carbon is required (can
be  conservatively  estimated by assuming a removal of
0.5  pounds  of COD per  pound  of  carbon  prior  to
regeneration)  and the configuration  of carbon contactor
to   be   used.  Typically,   the  carbon  doses  will  be
substantially higher than when granular  carbon is applied
to coagulated and filtered  secondary effluent. In  the
earlier example, a carbon dose of  slightly more than
1,000  pounds per million gallons was estimated. This
magnitude of dose is not unusual when applying carbon
to coagulated raw sewage.

Contact time of about 30 minutes has been reported by
many investigators as marking the point of diminishing
returns. That is, a drastically longer contact time would
not  provide any   proportionately  greater removal  of
organics.

The two major  alternate contactor configurations to
consider are open  concrete vessels of either an upflow or
downflow type or  upflow,  countercurrent columns in
steel  or  concrete  vessels. The  countercurrent approach
(see Figure  5)  offers a more efficient utilization of the
carbon as only the  most saturated carbon is withdrawn
for generation. This result is aided by the fact that as the
carbon becomes  saturated  with  organics, it  becomes
heavier.  When  the  carbon  column  is backwashed, the
                                                                       CARBON COLUMN
                                                                      -BYPASS VALVE
                                                                       CLOSED
                                                                      CARBON COLUMN
                                                                      INFLUENT HEADER
                                                                      VALVF-OPF.N
                                           TYPICAL ARRANGEMENT FOR UPFLOW.
                                         COUNTER CURRENT CARBON CONTACTOR
                                                  (MtOV LUI P a GULP)
                                                         67

-------
more saturated, heavier carbon  tends to maintain  a
position  at the bottom  of the  column  where it is
withdrawn  for  regeneration.  A semi-countercurrent
approach  can also  be achieved  by using two  downflow
columns in series. As indicated on Figure 6, water is first
passed down through  Column  A, then down through
Column B. When the carbon in  Column A is exhausted,
the carbon in Column  B is only partially spent. At this
time,  all  carbon  in  Column   A  is  removed  for
regeneration and is replaced with fresh carbon. Column
B then becomes  the lead column in the series. When the
carbon in Column  B is spent, the carbon is removed for
regeneration and is replaced with fresh carbon. This type
of  operation  gives only  some of the advantages  of
countercurrent operation because  only the carbon near
the  inlet  of  the  lead  bed  is  fully saturated with
impurities removed from the water and some capacity is
unused in much of the  rest  of the carbon sent  to
regeneration. Also,  the  piping  and   valving is  more
complex  and costly than for an upflow, countercurrent
column. Unless one is attempting to use the carbon for
the dual purpose for filtration and adsorption (which the
author does not recommend for most cases), there is no
advantage to using the downflow approach while there
are the disadvantages discussed above. The Technology
Transfer  Manual, "Process Manual for Carbon  Adsorp-
tion" (second edition, dated  October, 1973) contains
several illustrative contactor designs.

The choice of contactor design is also dependent upon
the  method  selected for control of hydrogen sulfide
generation in the carbon columns. The hydrogen sulfide
is  produced by sulfide-reducing bacteria under anaerobic
conditions.  Conditions  promoting  or accelerating the
production  of hydrogen  sulfide in carbon contactors
include:

•  Low concentrations or absence of dissolved oxygen
   and nitrate in the carbon contactor influent.
•  High concentrations of BOD and sulfates.
•  Long detention times.
•  Low flow-through velocities.
                                                                               TO CARBON
                                                                               RECLAfMfi'ir'
                                                    PIPING DlftG'tAM
                                                  FIRST
                                                 -  FLOW A TO B,
                                                   RENEW CARSON IN A

                                                  THEN,
                                                   FLOWB TO A,
                                                   RENEW CARBON IN B
                                                  THEN,
                                                   FLOW A TO B AND
                                                 — CYCLE IS COMPLETE
                                            TWO DOWNFLOW CARBON CONTACTORS IN SERIES
                                                       (FHOM CUI P & (Ul I1]
                                                      68

-------
It may be possible  to prevent  or  correct problems of
hydrogen sulfide  generation by eliminating one or more
of  the  conditions necessary to sustain growth of the
sulfate-reducing  bacteria.  Most   of  the   preventive
measures  must be provided in the design of the carbon
contacting system, but there are  also  some corrective
measures  which can  be  taken in plant operation. The
amount  of actual  plant  operation experience  in this
regard is limited.  To provide flexibility for dealing with
problems of hydrogen sulfide production in packed beds
of  carbon, facilities for application of chlorine to the
influent  should be  provided.  In  addition, in  upflow
expanded  beds it  may  be desirable  to  provide for
introduction  of  air,  oxygen  or sodium  nitrate (as a
source of oxygen). Because of the  mass of cell growth
produced,  it may be less desirable to introduce air  or
oxygen ahead of  packed  beds because of  potential
physical plugging of the beds. These growths are flushed
through expanded upflow beds,  but may be removed in
sections  of the plant which follow  such  as  filters  or
claiifiers.

Some  measures available in the operation  of carbon
facilities for control of hydrogen sulfide are:

•  Columns may  be  backwashed  at  more  frequent
   intervals or backwashed more violently by use of air
   scour or surface wash.
•  Detention time  may be  reduced by  taking some
   carbon contactor units  off the line, provided that the
   reduced carbon  contact  time is  still  sufficient  to
   obtain the desired removal of organics and that head
   losses in the carbon columns remaining on the line do
   not become excessive.
•  Chlorination or oxygen addition may be initiated.

In  operations  at the PCT  pilot  research facility  at
Pomona, California where the carbon influent consisted
of  chemically  clarified raw  wastewater, it  was  found
that:

•  Continuous chlorination of the carbon column influ-
   ent at  dosages up to 50 mg/1 reduced  significantly
   but did not stop I^S production.
•  Intermittent backwash,  surface  wash and  oxygen
   addition  reduced but  did not completely  eliminate
   H2S.
•  Intermittent backwash, surface wash and continuous
   oxygen addition  to DO = 4 mg/1  reduced  sulfide
   formation but  stimulated biological growth and head
   loss in the carbon bed.
•  The  addition of  air wash to normal backwash and
   surface  wash was not  effective  against H2S and  7
   inches of carbon was lost from the bed.
•  The  continuous addition of  sodium nitrate  to the
   carbon column influent at the rate of 4 to 5 mg/1 as
   N03—N completely inhibited H2S generation in the
   column.
At  the Cleveland Westerly  pilot plant,  all efforts to
eliminate sufide odors in carbon columns following PCT
were found to be impractical. However, the BOD of the
carbon column influent at this plant ranged from 80 to
100 mg/1  as opposed to around 40 mg/1  at Pomona.
The control methods used were: (1) daily backwashing
at  10  gpm/sq. foot plus surface  wash at 2 gpm/sq. foot
for 28 minutes, (2) continuous addition  of NaN03 to
the influent, and (3) backwashing with water containing
27  mg/1 of chlorine  (from NaOCI). At dosages of 100
mg/1 of NaNOg (expressed as NO^) sulfide production
was climated  but this high dosage was not considered
economically practical.


Sulfides in the carbon column effluent can  be removed
by  precipitation  with iron or by addition of chlorine.
However, at this time the most effective means of coping
with the H2S problem appears to be  to maintain aerobic
conditions  in the carbon contactors rather  than  trying
to remove  H2S after it is formed. If the BOD applied to
the carbon is less than 5 mg/1 as is the case  in most
tertiary treatment schemes, the H2S problem  is easily
controlled. For applied  BOD values substantially  higher
than  this,  it  appears  that  use  of  upflow,  aerobic
expanded  contactors  followed  by  sedimentation  or
filtration is preferable.
Also, breakpoint  chlorination, prior to downflow beds,
although expensive, has been reported effective at Blue
Plains in controlling hydrogen sulfide. Since most of the
nitrogen can be expected to be on the ammonia form in
PCT applications, efficient nitrogen removal could also
be  achieved  with  this  approach. Higher  operating
pressures and hence, greater carbon depths may be used
in steel  pressure contactors. As  a result,  a concrete
contactor generally has a shallower carbon depth and a
greater  surface area  of carbon  to maintain the same
contact  time.  Thus,  there  is   substantially  more
underdrain area and  influent and effluent headers per
unit of contact time  in the gravity concrete structures.
Economic  comparisons between  the  two approaches
show that there is not a great deal of cost difference in
most cases. When using steel contactors, it is imperative
that the interior be properly protected from the very
corrosive effects of partially dewatered activated carbon.
Two 8-mil thick coatings of a coal tar epoxy has proven
to  be effective  at Tahoe  over 4  years of continuous
operation.  Fiberglass-polyester coatings would also  be
effective although more costly  than the coal-tar epoxy
coatings. Costs for shop-applied coatings will  vary from
about  $0.50/ft2  to   $2.00/ft2  depending upon  the
material  and thickness selected. Costs for field applied
coatings will be about twice as high. Also, in most cases,
the costs for fabricating steel vessels in the field will be
substantially higher per pound of  steel than for a shop
fabricated vessel.
                                                      69

-------
Carbon Regeneration

As  granular  activated  carbon  adsorbs  organics from
wastewater,  the  carbon  pores  eventually  become
saturated and the carbon must be regenerated for reuse.
The  best way to restore  the adsorptive capacity  of the
carbon is by  means of thermal regeneration. By heating
the  carbon in a  low-oxygen  steam  atmosphere in a
multiple-hearth furnace at temperatures of 1,650-1,750
degrees F,  the dissolved  organics  are  volatized and
released  in  gaseous form.  The  regenerated carbon is
cooled by water quenching.  By proper treatment, carbon
can be restored to near virgin adsorptive capacity while
limiting burning  and attrition losses to 5-10 percent.
Regeneration furnace off-gas odors can be controlled by
afterburning, if necessary, and particulates and soluble
gases can  be   removed  by  use  of  Venturi  or  jet
impingement  type  scrubbers.  Figure  7  illustrates a
typical regeneration system.

The  carbon furnace should be sized with recognition of
the fact that substantial downtime may be required for
maintenance of the furnace. An allowance of 40 percent
downtime  in  selecting  the  furnace  size  provides a
conservative basis for  furnace selection. Details on  the
design and operation  of carbon regeneration systems
may be found in Advanced Wastewater Treatment and in
the EPA Technology Transfer Manual, "Process Design
Manual   for   Carbon  Adsorption"  (second  edition,
October, 1973).
                          MAKEUP
                          CARBON
                          CARBON
                          SLURRY BIN


t— p
'*
\

Jk- —
*
T



==» SPENT CARBON DRAIN
AND FEED TANKS
. SCREW
/ CONVEYORS

X A





a
i r
i
                                                                         SPENT CARBON FROM
                                                                         'CARBON COLUMNS
                                                                        CARBON
                                                                        REGENERATION
                                                                        FURNACE
                                                          CARBON
                                                          SLURRY
                                                          PUMPS
                                                                     QUENCH
                                                        REGENERATED CARBON
                                                        DE-FINING AND
                                                        STORAGE TANKS
                                                                        . REGENERATED CARBON
                                                                         TO CARBON COLUMNS
                                                     FIGURE 7
                                        ILLUSTRATIVE CARBON REGENERATION SYSTEM
                                                  (FROM CUI P 6 CULP)
                                                        70

-------
ALTERNATE SYSTEMS
Several  alternate  approaches  now   being  used  or
investigated for use in various parts of the country are
summarized  in  Figure  8 and some specific  cases are
described  below.  The exact  effluent  quality by each
process  will depend  on  the  specific  influent  quality
involved; however, the effluent quality  achieved in each
previous study indicates the general capabilities of each
process.

Rocky River, Ohio Study
Rizzo and Schade studied a physical-chemical system for
application at Rocky River, Ohio in a 10 mgd plant now

               TABLE 4
              under construction. The raw sewage was coagulated with
              an anionic polymer  (about 0.3 mg/1) settled, and then
              applied to granular carbon columns essentially using the
              schematic shown in Figure 8-C. The downflow carbon
              columns  serve  the  dual purpose of adsorption  and
              filtration. In order to provide the phosphorus removal,
              an inorganic coagulant must be used in conjunction with
              the polymer. The full-scale plant at Rocky River will use
              ferric chloride in addition to  the polymer to  provide
              phosphorus removal.
              Rocky River pilot tests with four small carbon columns
              in series were  performed over a 31-day period.  The
              following table summarizes the results.

                       CARBON CONTACT
                       TIME, MINUTES
                                                 CLARIFIER
                                         RAW    EFFLUENT
                          14.0    23.4    32.6
               Suspended Solids, mg/1
               BOD, mg/1
               COD, mg/1
107
118
235
 65
 57
177
13
21
67
15
11
50
44
                                 COAGULANT
PRELIMINARY

/»











CLARIFICATION


fXPANDED
CARSON
ADSORPTION


FILTRATION


DISINFECTION
                                                 CARSON   I
                                                REGENERATION I
                                ^COAGULANT
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
!,

CHEMICAL
CLARIFICATION


CARBON
ADSORPTION


DISINFECTION
CAR3
HtGENER
DN
ATION
                                               FIGURES

                               TYPICAL PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL TREATMENT SCHEMES -
                                                     71

-------
Ewing-Lawrence Studies

Weber, et al, have reported on studies conducted at the
Ewing-Lawrence Sewerage  Authority  plant near Tren-
ton, New Jersey.  The  raw  sewage  was  coagulated,
settled, filtered and passed upward through an expanded
carbon bed  (Figure 8-b).  Filtration was also evaluated
following the  carbon  treatment.  The  degritted  raw
sewage was coagulated with an inorganic coagulant and
then pasted  through a  sedimentation  basin at a rate of
about  700  gpd/sf. Weber  found  that  there  was no
significant difference in the adsorption efficiency of a
downflow, packed  carbon bed and an  expanded upflow
bed. The expanded beds offered the  advantage of not
requiring backwash for removal of biological solids. The
wastewater used  in these studies was  very weak as
reflected by the primary effluent BOD of 40 to 60 mg/1,
with a clarified effluent BOD of only 10  to 20 mg/1
being applied to the carbon. The initial value of soluble
BOD is much lower than  usually  found  in municipal
wastes.   The   soluble  BOD  applied to   the  carbon
stimulated biological growth within the carbon columns.
The biological activity  is enhanced by  the  overall
capacity  for removal of organics by oxidizing a portion
of  the adsorbed  organics. However,  the  benefit  was
accompanied  by a problem of generation  of hydrogen
sulfide  under  the anaerobic conditions encountered in
the columns.  Addition of hypochlorite  to the carbon
influent  was  moderately  effective   in  reducing  the
hydrogen sulfide odor. Aeration  of the carbon influent
partially   reduced   the  odor but  produced  enough
biological floe to  plug the packed bed adsorbers. The
approach  finally used  was to bleed  oxygen into the
influent of an expanded, upflow bed whenever there was
evidence  of hydrogen sulfide in the product water. The
5-day BOD of the carbon effluent averaged 2 to 3 mg/1.

Z-M Process

The basic flowsheet for this  process consists of lime
coagulation  at high pH (11), settling,  recarbonation,
filtration  and granular carbon adsorption. The basic
flowsheet of  the  type shown in Figure 8-a with the
requirement of high pH being an integral part of the
approach.  The  process  developers  claim that  the
adsorption of the organics found in raw sewage may be
improved with the addition  of  lime  to raise  the  raw
sewage  pH to a very  high value.  They feel that  this
causes   hydrolysis  of  high-molecular-weight   organic
molecules with  resulting lower  weight  organics being
more readily adsorbed. Effluent  COD values of 2 mg/1
have been claimed. The  pH required to  achieve the
claimed  hydrolysis reaction varies from wastewater to
wastewater but is generally in the range  of 11.8 and
higher.

Biological growths  occurred  in the carbon columns in
laboratory and pilot tests. Carbon  contact time was 67
minutes in the pilot plant. The resulting potential
problem  was  controlled by backwashing the carbon
columns  whenever  the D.O.  dropped  more than 0.5
mg/1  during  the  passage  through the  column. With
stronger wastewaters, more typical of municipal wastes,
backwashing of the columns based on that D.O. would
be impractical. In addition  to backwashing on the basis
of D.O. decrease, the last portion of the backwash water
was chlorinated to minimize biological growth.

During the "best monthly period" of  the  pilot plant
operation,  the  carbon  influent COD  of 65 mg/1 was
reduced to 2 to 14 mg/1 (average of 8.6 mg/1). During a
"stable  period"  of three  weeks, the   effluent  COD
averaged 11 mg/1. The COD of 65 mg/1 applied to the
carbon  is  lower  than  will  be   the  case for many
coagulated and settled raw municipal wastes.

For the Z-M process, large quantities of lime are required
to raise the pH to the desired range. Lime requirements
of 600 to 800  mg/1  are  not unusual.  This results  in
larger quantities of sludge to be handled when compared
to the required coagulant dose for  good coagulation and
phosphorus removal only.  Also, the quantities  of C02
required   for  pH  adjustment  are  increased.  Weber
reported on tests in which  no benefit resulted from use
of the high pH proposed in the Z-M process. Similarly,
on-site pilot tests at Cleveland, Ohio which are described
below, did not show any benefit from use of a high pH
prior  to carbon adsorption. Thus, extensive tests should
be conducted  on any given wastewater to determine if
any benefits occurring by  raising the  pH to these high
values offset the additional  costs.
Cleveland, Ohio Study

Laboratory  investigations and  pilot  plant  studies of
physical-chemical  treatment  of  raw  sewage  at  the
Westerly plan in Cleveland, Ohio were conducted from
July 1970 to April 1971. The study goal was to develop
design   criteria  for  a  50  mgd  plant  now  under
construction. The basic processes used were coagulation,
settling, filtration and granular carbon adsorption(Figure
8-a).

The  raw sewage BOD averaged  235 mg/1 and the COD
523  mg/1 during the pilot study. The BOD applied to
the carbon averaged about 90 mg/1 and the COD 150
mg/1.

BOD and COD  removals averaged 86.5 percent and 92.4
percent,  respectively, which correspond to  an average
effluent BOD of 31 mg/1  and COD of 40  mg/1.  Severe
problems  with  generation of hydrogen sulfide  in the
carbon  columns  also  occurred, and no  satisfactory
solution was developed during the pilot study.
                                                     72

-------
Blue Plains Study
   FULL SCALE APPLICATIONS
Physical-chemical  treatment of  raw  wastewater  was
among the  alternates  studied by the  EPA  in  their
Washington, D.C.  pilot  plant. The process consisted of
lime coagulation,  sedimentation, filtration and granular
carbon adsorption (Figure 8-a). The raw sewage had an
average BOD of 129 mg/1 and a COD of 307 mg/1. Raw
sewage was lime coagulated in the pH  range of 11.3 to
11.7.  About 80 percent BOD removal  was achieved by
lime coagulation only.  Thus,  the  BOD applied to the
carbon was 20-30 mg/1.

Average carbon contact time  was 27  minutes in four
series columns of downflow, packed bed  configuration.
Hydrogen  sulfide  problems  could not be controlled by
daily  backwashing  of  the lead  column.  A caustic
backwash (600 mg/1 NaOH  for 30 minutes) of the lead
column every other day reduced  the biological activity
somewhat  but  F^S persisted at  the  2.5  mg/1 level.
During early tests, the  COD was reduced from 41 to 8
mg/1 but later reductions were substantially less, with an
effluent COD of 20 mg/1. At  a carbon loading of 0.46
pounds per COD per pound  of carbon, the carbon from
the  first two columns was replaced.

Physical-chemical  treatment  of raw wastewater at Blue
Plains (consisting of 2-stage lime precipitation, filtration
and carbon adsorption) produced the following average
effluent quality over a  10 month period: BOD of 6.2
mg/1  (95% removal), COD  of 15.5 mg/1 (95 percent
removal), and 0.13 mg/1 total phosphorus (99 percent
removal).   The   f^S   problem   was  controlled   and
ammonia removed by breakpoint chlorination ahead of
the  carbon. Backwashing of the  lead column everyday
coupled with feeding of  15 mg/1 oxygen to  the lead
column and lesser amounts to each downstream column
also controlled the F^S problem.
   Table 6 summarizes the status of several major projects
   utilizing  physical-chemical  treatment  of  raw waste-
   waters. The  effluent data  in  Tables 5 and 6 and the
   author's  experience  in   the  evaluation  of  many
   wastewaters  in  the laboratory indicate that the PCT
   approach is best suited for cases where the effluent BOD
   requirements  are  in  the  7-20 mg/1 range. Most raw
   wastewaters  contain  enough  non-adsorbable BOD to
   prevent consistent achievement of BOD values of 1-7
   mg/1   unless biological  treatment  precedes  carbon
   adsorption. However, as indicated in Table 6, there are
   many instances where regulatory requirements fall in the
   range which can be met by PCT.

   SUMMARY

   Physical-chemical  treatment of raw wastewaters offers
   performance advantages over  biological  treatment, in
   that  somewhat higher removals of BOD are generally
   provided  while  substantially  higher removals of  sus-
   pended solids and phosphorus  are provided. The process
   is not adversely  affected by toxic materials. Substantial
   savings in space  are achieved with physical-chemical
   treatment. Under some conditions, it  may also  offer
   economic advantages.

   Not  all organics  found  in municipal wastewaters are
   adsorbable on carbon. Thus, the limitation on BOD and
   COD removal will depend on the quantities of these
   non-adsorbable materials present in a given  wastewater.
   Generally, 90-95 percent BOD and COD removal can be
   achieved. Techniques  are presented which enable the
   design engineer to  evaluate  the quantity of nonadsorb-
   able  organics present in a given wastewater. Techniques
   for evaluation of alternate  coagulants and the handling
   of the resulting sludge are also presented.
                                                 TABLE 5
                          SUMMARY OF EFFICIENCY OF PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL
                                  TREATMENT OF RAW WASTEWATERS

                                                        INFLUENT*         EFFLUENT*
                                                   CHARACTERISTICS  CHARACTERISTICS
                TEST SITE
BOD COD SS
     BOD COD SS
                Rocky River, Ohio
                Eqing—Lawrence, New Jersey
                Z-M Pilot Plant at New Rochelle, N.Y.
                Cleveland, Ohio
                Blue Plains, D.C.
118
100
-
235
235
—
220
523
107
_
—
207
—
10
7.6
5.4
8
2-3
_
24
44
_
2-14
50
129  307  -
                13
3.4   6.2   15.5  -
1
0.2
0.5
0.13
                                                     73

-------















1
0-
»r*
z
IU
3E
IU
ec
<
ui
x
u
j
<
u
V)
->
X
fl






















IW
«,
^g
c.
5 o
O U! Z
tig
"2 *
"9
z
§s
5"
U
 _
c 5 " -

> E* < ~
< S



c
zS
0 z
3i5
°£

Sc
(A



kU
1-



tJ

F
0
o

o
n






<-,

g





0




£
O «,
a £


C?






?
ril
o


1


>;
_^
^
o

-*

w
< < Cl

%. % u
E E E
«n O O
a o o
o o o

0 g 0

Ml
^ « 0




« -

ia ** o
r* n »»

-

.. —
~
^- •- n§




1. 1. 1
g! e= |g
.§£ |S a §
O tt OCL 3 O


o « *o
m *- n


B
c

Ji 5 •»
F !«, i
1 ?| £ s
£. E5 £ =
u 
J I i
-3 0 ^ *~.
I1 1 1
u £ O
CN> (-> •«

kt

- ^ ^ ^.
r r r t
o ? -- ?
O O Cl Q
O 0 0 0
O O ci 3

s s e s
- '
0 W
£ 0 0 0 |




ft n *>» cv

X
K S S S ^





r* •- e% r» _E




l- S. , ***
= = c? 12 |c5
i= Is =^ c*s
5* of c." =.o»
oc. o c» — «: =>o£


» 0 °
— v o


c
2

* - »- 6 "
1 Is 11 ?- II
i !| n til
-i O*o < Z CD u«  2f £ 5
Z "•» ^
1 1 I 1
J Z O OC
iff O rJ (O

0

c
0
o

s

^




n

g





-




Oownllow
?ronur«


0
•~





•5 ^
S =
" 2
— <

C
o
ConiiruC

o
6
^
O
1C
"

r>

tQ ^
"o
is

0
—
tt>




0

„



-

-




Upflow
'Extended


«
~~





S
c
ui
2


§.
s
o


i
CJ
o
>
o


















--
-r -


!
g


s








N

|
0
S.
I
I
n
|
"w
2
3
1
>
S
E
tu

^



















e
E
ll
II
1 ii

3 E ^

^ "* i
X S













•9
ll
111
s S *
|3g
III
a U i-

000
SO O
O 1-

SI

-------
Design   considerations   for  the   unit  processes   of
coagulation,   settling,   filtration,   carbon   adsorption,
carbon  regeneration and sludge handling are discussed.
Design  and operational considerations for the control of
hydrogen  sulfide  generations within carbon contactors
are also discussed.

Experiences gained at several locales in  pilot  tests are
presented  as well as a tabulation of the  design criteria
being employed in several full-scale installations.
REFERENCES
 1.  Gulp,  G.L., "Chemical Treatment of Raw Sewage," Water
    and Wastes Engineering, p.61 (July 1967) and p.54 (October
    1967).
 2.  Pearse, et al,  "Chemical Treatment of Sewage,"  Sewage
    Works Journal, p. 997 (1935).
 3.  Culp,  R.L. and Culp, G.L., Advanced  Wastewater Treat-
    ment. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1971).
 4.  Rizzo, J.L. and Schade,  R.E., "Secondary Treatment with
    Granular  Activated Carbon," Water and Sewage Works, p.
    307 (August 1969).
 5.  Anonymous,  "Carbon Makes Debut in  Secondary  Treat-
    ment, " Environmental  Science  and Technology,  p.  809
    (1969).
 6.  Kugelman,  I.J. and Cohen, J.M., "Chemical-Physical Proc-
    esses,., presented  at  the Advanced Waste Treatment  and
    Water Reuse Symposium, Cleveland, Ohio (March 1971).
 7.  Weber, W., Hopkins, C.B., and Bloom, R.,  "Physiochemical
    Treatment of Wastewater, " Journal Water Pollution Control
    Federation, p. 83 (1970).
 8.  Zuckerman, M. and Molof, A.H.,  "High Quality Reuse Water
    by Chemical-Physical  Wastewater Treatment (Discussion by
    W. Weber)," Journal Water  Pollution Control Federation, p.
    437 (1970).
 9.  Molof, A.H. and Zuckerman, M.,  "High Quality Reuse Water
    from  a   Newly  Developed  Chemical-Physical  Treatment
    Process," presented at the  Fifth International Water Pollu-
    tion  Research  Conference,  San Francisco,  California (July
    1970).
10.  Shuckrow,  A.J., Bonner, W.F., Prescan,  N.L., and Kaz-
    mierczak,  E.J., A Pilot Study of Physical-Chemical Treat-
    ment  of  the  Raw Wastewater  at the  Westerly Plant in
    Cleveland, Ohio (unpublished, 1971).
11.  Bishop, D.F.,  et al, "Advanced Waste Treatment at the EPA
    District of Columbia Pilot Plant." Paper presented at the
    68th  National  Meeting  of the AICHE,  Houston, Texas
    (March 1971).
12.  "Chemical-Physical Wastewater  Treatment  - Phase 2, Acti-
    vated Carbon Adsorption and Polishing,"  Technical Paper
    No.  17,  New York  State Department  of Environmental
    Conservation (January 1972).
13.  "Miniature  Treatment Plant Operates  m  Housing Com-
    munity,"  p. 102, Water and Sewage Works, (May 1973).
14.  "Town's (Garland, Texas) Sewage Treatment Plant Will Use
    Ultra-High-Rate Filtration," Engineering News Record, p.
    21 (February 22, 1973).
15.  "Process  Manual for  Carbon  Adsorption," Office of Tech-
    nology Transfer,  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    second edition (October 1973).
                                                            75

-------
                              SYNTHESIS OF CATIONIC POLYELECTROLYTES
                          FOR TREATMENT OF NATURAL AND WASTE WATERS.

                                        Korshak V.V., Zubakova L.B.,
                                        Gandurina L.B.

                                        Mendeleev D.I. Moscow Chemistry
                                        Technological Institute
                                        VNIIVODGEO
   Nowdays reagent treatment of waste waters with the
use of highly-molecular  organic material-flocculants is
one of the most popular  methods in practice of natural
and waste waters treatment.
   Flocculants used together with  mineral coagulant or
alone afford intensification of water treatment  pro-
cesses,  improving  its  quality, reducing  of  mineral
reagents doses and quantity of formed slime correspond-
ingly, improving of filtering and mechanical character-
istics of sludge.
   The  charge   of colloidal  particles and flocculant
macromolecules  is of great significance for adsorption
and flocculation.
   Coagulation  process is facilitated at the  expense of
electrostatic attraction of contrary charged  particles in
case if charge of colloidal particles and macromolecules
of polymers is different by its sign. The best way to treat
natural and waste waters is to use polyelectrolytes with
highlybasic  ionogenous  groups, since the most waste
waters pollutants have negative charge.
   In  connection with this the problem of new cationic
polyelectrolytes  synthesis  and  investigation  of their
physical-chemical properties is of great practical interest.
   Besides it must be noted that  there is extremely a
small  number of  polymers  having  high  efficiency in
processes  of water and  waste treatment of industrial
effluent.
   Existing methods of cationic polyelectrolytes synthe-
sis may be directed into two main groups:
   -  polymersimilar transformation  of  polymerization
and poly condensation linear polymers,
   -  polymerization  of nonlimitive  ionogenous  mono-
mers.
   In the first case cationic polyelectrolytes are received
as the  result of  polymers chemical transformations
non-containing  ionogenous  groups (polystyrene, poly-
vinyl  toluene) or containing lowbasic ionogenous groups
(poly vinylpiridine, polyvinylhynoline).
   Nonionogenous polymers are chloreme thy late d  and
amminated  by various  tertiary  amines:  triethylamine,
triethanolamine etc. For  the purpose  of receiving highly
basic  polyelectrolites at the  base of polymers containing
lowbasic  functional  groups, they   are   treated with
different alkylating agents  (halogen  alkyls, dialkylsul-
phates etc.).
   However given  methods  of cationic polyelectrolytes
synthesis are distinguished by their multistage character,
complicating technological scheme of receiving them, by
existence  of accessory  reactions  leading to  structure
formation  of  polymers  and creation  of unregular in
content polymers.  Besides  received cationic  polyelec-
trolites, are characterised by comparatively low values of
molecular weights.
   Therefore one stage  process of ionogenous unsatu-
rated monomers polymerization is more perspective as
far as it affords receiving highly molecular anionites with
maximum ionogenous groups content.
   The initial  material used for the  synthesis  of highly
basic water-soluble  polyelectrolytes were  quaternary
vinylpyridine salts (QVPS) on vinylpyridine and various
alkylating  agents base  that conditioned by extremely
high  reactivity of  these salts  and also availability of
source of raw materials.
   Monomeric  vinylpyridine  salts  easily  enter  into
polymerization  due  to high  polarization  of double
connection when positive charge on nitrogen  atom. As
the  double connections are more  polarizated  in the
ortho-and para-positions it is not possible in most  cases
to receive  unlimited quaternary salts on the base  of 2
and 4 vinylpyridines because the polymeric products are
immediately released in this case.
   At the same time as  a result of reaction of 2-methyl
and   5-vinylpyridines (2M5V)  and  various  alkylating
agents the stable quaternary vinylpyridine salts (Q  VPS)
are  formed due to  the less  activity of the double
connection.
   It was established that the releasing of poly-I-alkyl-2
methyl -5 - vinylpyridine halides (2 MSV - RX) and poly
-  1.2  demethyl  -   5   - vinylpyridine  - n  - toluene
sulphonates (2 MSV -  METSA) is determined by  the
conditions of  carrying  out of the reaction:  medium
polarity, temperature, duration and so on.
   A great effect has the  nature of alkylating agents
(table No I).
                       Table I
   Releasing (weight in  p.c.) of QWS depending on the
nature of halide alkyl and radical length.

           R    CH3 C2H5    C3H7    C4H9
     J
     Br
     Cl
80
78
15
65
60
40
5.0
15.0
60
42
                                                      76

-------
   Vinylpyridine salts polymerization was performed by
three methods:
   -  Spontanous QVPS  polymerization  in concentrated
water solutions by specific ion mechanism;
   -  radical  QVPS  polymerization in  water ethanol
solutions;
   -  radical  QVPS polymerization  without their inter-
mediate isolation.
   QVPS polymerization by  three methods affords not
only exposing the  influence of synthesis method choice
on  yield  and properties of received  polyelectrolytes
(molecular  weight,  ionogenous  groups  concentration
etc.),  but  also   comparing efficiency  of  different
synthesis  methods   for  the   purpose  of  receiving
polyelectrolytes  suitable for natural and waste waters
treatment.
   Till now  general attention of researches was directed
at studying of spontanous polymerization of quarternary
vinylpyridine salts.
   Kabanov  discovered  that the reaction is  going by
specific anion mechanism after detailed kinetic investiga-
tions of non-limitive quarternary salts at the base of
vinylpyridine  with dimethylsulphate spontanous poly-
merization reaction.  In  result quarternary polymer salts
of highly molecular weight are formed and it's significant
at their use  as flocculants for natural and waste waters
treatment.
   The fact  that reaction is performed without initiators
at low lemperatures (25-30°C) is highly significant.
   Investigations  showed  that  there was rapid fall of
polymerization speed at  reducing  of  monomeric  salt
concentration in solution.
   It  should be noted  that  at  QVPS  concentration I
mole/1 and lower the reaction doesn't proceed.

                TABLE 2
                            Analogical  dependence  has  place  for  molecular
                          weights of received polymers (drw.I).
                            The  nature  of antiions has  great  influence  on
                          spontanous polymerization QVPS speed.
                            If at  2M5V-METSA salt  polymerization for 4 hours
                          yield  is   17%  of theoretical,  at  2M5V-CH3B  salt
                          polymerization yield is 52%; and that is highly probable
                          that  it's  the  result  of  different  nucleophility  and
                          mobility of anions, initiating spontanous polymerization
                          reaction.
                            Total duration of spontanous polymerization reaction
                          in concentrated water  solution is floatuating from 24 to
                          48 hours.  Depending  on the character of polymerized
                          monomer salt (table 2).
                            The second  method   of cationic  polyelectrolytes
                          synthesis     radical  polymerization   of  QVPS,  is
                          distinguished by high productivity (table 2).
                            It is seen at given data  that reaction duration in this
                          case is 6-10 hours.
                            However, molecular weights characteristic viscosities
                          of synthesized polysalts  are significantly lower  than
                          those values for polyelectrolites, received by spontanous
                          polymerization. Characteristic peculiarity of quarternary
                          vinylpyridine   salts  radical polymerization   is   the
                          influence of media in which the reaction  is performed
                          (3).  First   of  all  it's  conditioned by  existence  of
                          ionogenous groups and the strength of inter-ionous and
                          inter-molecular interactions  of reacting particles  and
                          activity  of reaction centres  depend on the degree of
                          these groups dissotiation.
                            The speed of I - ethyl - 2  - methyl - 5 - vinylpyridine
                          bromide   in   water-spirit   solutions.   -   increases
                          approximately  4  times at transfer to less ionizing solvent
                          (absolute standard) comparing  with the same value in
                     Dependence of reaction duration and
                     poly vinylpyridine salts viscosity.
                     Characteristics on the way of receiving them.
                Salt
                descrip-
                tion
Synthesis method
Reaction   Polymer
duration   yield
   hr         %
Polymer
hund. ml/g
                2M5V—
Spontanous polymeri-
zation.                       24         95         8.7
Radical polymerization        10         93         0.7
Without isolation of
monomer salt.                12         93         0.3

Spontanous polymeri-
zation.                       48         91         3.9
Radical polymerization         8         98         0.6
Without isolation of
monomer salt                 12         97         0.24
                x)   Characteristic viscosity — 0.05 normal solution KBr.
                2M5V—
                                                      77

-------
highly polar solvent (water).
  QVPS  radical  polymerization  speed depends  on
monomer salt nature.
  So radical  length increase  at  QVPS  nitrogen  atom
from CH3  to  €3^  lead  to reducing  reaction  rate
approximately three times.

Table 3     Values of initial rates and total constants
           of QVPS polymerization in 50% water ethanol
           solution.

      Initiator - asodiisobutyronitrile.

  Monomer      Temperature    VQ10 4mole/sec    K-102
2M5V-CH3J
2M5V-C2H5J

2M5V-CH3Br
2M5V-C2H5Br
2M5V-C3H7Br
              70
              70
              75
              75
              75
              75
2.14
2.96
1.50
0.99
0.57
9.84
5.56
7.70
3.90
2.57
1.49
   Comparing    of   iodine    and   bromine    salts
 polymerization rates constants shows that bromine salts
 are polymerized slower than iodine salts (table 3). In all
 probability the  difference of kinetic characteristic of
 these  salts  is  connected  with  different  degree  of
 monomers    molecules    ionization    and   growing
 macroradicals (3).
   Water  soluble highly basic polyelectrolytes can be
 received not only by methods of spontanous and radical
 polymerization  of non-limiting  QVPS, but  also  by
 radical polymerization of the latter ones, withouf'their
 intermediate isolation.
   This one stage method  of cationic  polyelectrolites
 synthesis is of interest by two reasons:
   Firstly  using  this   method   of  receiving  cationic
polyelectrolytes monomer vinylpyridine salts isolation is
not required that simplifies the process significantly.
  Secondly, this method of polyelectrolytes synthesis is
unchangeable  in  cases when monomer salts  are received
with low yields or can't be isolated from reaction sphere.
For  example, monomer  salts  at  the base, of 4  -
vinylpyridine  and  different haloid  alkyls  couldn't be
isolated  and  therefore  the  last method  is  the only
possible  of all  above  mentioned  ways for receiving
cationic polyelectrolytes.
  Therefore   it  should  be concluded  that  all  three
methods may  be  used.
   The choice of method is defined by definite area and
synthesized polymers application conditions.
   Properties and application of cationic
   polyelectrolytes at the base of 2-methyl-
   -3-vinylpyridine.

   For preliminary appreciation  of  cationic  polyelectro-
lytes application possibilities as flocculants investigation
of  their behaviour  in water  solutions is significant. In
particular, investigation of viscous  and  electrochemical
properties of  polyelectrolytes  solutions reveal the struc-
ture condition of polymer macromolecules in solution,
its  ionogenous  abilities,  associations  of antiions  and
polyions.
   As the result of these investigations it was established
that for water solutions of polymer quarternary  salts at
vinylpyridines base non-linear increase of the viscosity
with  dilution usual  for  polyelectrolites   is observed.
However for  polyelectrolites  of  highly molecular weight
received  by spontanous polymerization of quarternary
vinylpyridine  salts  viscosity isotherms pass  througn"
minimum   at   definite    concentration    (Cg)   of
polyelectrolytes in  solution, (drw.  2). At CQ concentra-
               -io    is
                           20    J~5~*To
51.
            Itoaoner cooc8Htratioa,mole/L

            Relationship between initial Bpeed of salt
           polymerization 2ICY - CgH^Br and molecular
            of resulting polyaeridea and initial concentration
            of Bononer. Temperature - 25*0.
                                                                                            } - h.O;  '1- - 8.J !
                                                        78

-------
tion the  increase of the viscosity  is observed, which is
explained by aggregation of  macromolecules  at the
expence of intermolecular interactions.
   Studying  of electroconductivity  of polymer  and
monomer vinylpyridine salts  shows  their  significant
difference.
   Firstly,  equivalent  electroconductivity  of polymer
salts  is  lower  than  manomers  (table  4).  Secondly,
isotherms of electroconductivity  for  polymers  have
curvilinear concave character.
Table 4
          Equivalent electroconductivity of water
          solutions of QVPS and polyelectrolites
          at their base at concentration 0.015
          mole/1.
Description . Equivalent electrical

polyelectro-
lite
HPS-I
HPS-6
HPS-7
HPS-8
HPS-10
HPS-1 1
i

Monomeric —
salt 1
2M5V-METSA
2M5V-CH3J
2M5V-C2H5J
2M5V-C3H?J
2M5V-CH3Br
2M5V-C2H5Br
conduction

i
monomer |
49
88.5
83.5
80.5
92.0
85.0



polymer

hund.
ml/g

16 2.0
17.9 1.0
15.2 1.2
12.85 0.9
30.6 3.2
36.5 4.0
   These features of electrochemical properties of solu-
tions are conditioned by series of specific characteristics
distinctive only for polyelectrolytes (counterion connec-
tion, association  of ions). Values of seeming constant
ionization calculated with the help of Kachalcky-Spitnik
equation have extremely high values with the range 3.9-
4.85 indicative of presence of counterion association in
polyelectrolytes water solutions.
   Investigations associated with the treatment of natu-
ral  and  waste water  with  utilization  of  synthesized
polyelectrolytes showed their high efficiency.
   So  the  investigation of  flocculating capability of
polimeric halogen  containing vinylpyridine  salts for
removing of humus substances from natural water was
carried out together with Voronezh State University of
Lenin's Komsomol.
   The investigations  were carried out with water solu-
tions of humic acid and fulvic acid with 2-10 mg/L
concentration. The concentration of ionogenous groups
of  fulvic acids  was 5.57 mg.equiv/g. The content of
carboxylic  groups and  the  summery concentration of
carboxylic and fenolic groups of humic acids are turned
out  to be 1.41 mg.equiv/g and 3.52 mg.equiv/g. HPS-6,
HPS-7; HPS-II were used in  salt  and OH-form  as the
flocculants. The conversion into the OH-form is accom-
panied by yield of weakly basic  groups in polyelectro-
lytes.
   It is determined by isomerization of hydroxide alkyl
vinylpyridine formed when changing the gallogen-ions to
OH-groups;  as a result the methylene bases  containing
tertiary amino groups are formed.
   Exchange volume of polyelectrolite found according
to the highly basic groups and the summary of highly
and weakly basic groups is given in Table 5.
   The flocculants volume determined on  the  basis of
data of potentiometric titration.

Table 5

      The flocculants volume determined on the basis of
 data of potentiometric titration.
Flocculant
description
Volume mg. eqiv./g
                                                                       ace. to highly basic
                                                                            groups
                                    ace; to summary of
                                    highly and weakly
                                      basic groups
                                         E2
HPS-6
HPS-7
HPS-H
2.41
3.45
3.45
4.27
4.32
5.50
   The presence of acid groups in humus substances and
general  functional  groups  in  flocculants  permit  to
suppose that the yield of humic acid and  fulvic acid is
occured at the expense of chemical interaction of these
groups.  In this case the polymer consumption should be
calculated according to the formula:
                         •C
G - polyelectrolite dose, mg/L

C - concentration of humic and fulvic acids in the water,
mg
Ep ; EPA ; EHA - exchange volumes of the flocculant;
fulvic acid and humic acid, mg. equiv./g.

   However,  the  designed  doses for polyelectrolites in
OH — form extremely exceed the experimentally -found
doses of flocculants. (table 6).
   It points to the  fact that the flocculation process is
determined not only by the volume of humus substances
and  polybasic but  the  size  of  molecule  of these
compounds.
                                                      79

-------
                                                      Table 6
                               Designed and experimentally-definite doses of flocculants.

Designed doses of flocculants
Flocculant
description




mg/mg

i
EIHA l

HPS-6 0
HPS-7 0
HPS-II 0
I
59
41
42
EIF
i
E2HA|
1
1.46
1.02
1.06

[
EFA i
1
2.30
1.62
1.70

1
EIHA i
i
0.31
0.32
0.25


E

0
0
E2F
1
2HA ,
1
82
81
0.64
1
1
1

EFA 1
l
1.30
1.25
1.1
Experimental
doses
m

of acids
g/mg
1
humic 1
acid
0.8-0
0.9-1
0.6-1
1
i
9
0
2

fulvic
acid
0.6-0.7
0.6-0.7
0.6-0.7
   As it was established the cationic polyelectrolites on
the basis of vinylpyridines may be used successfully for
industry waste  water treatment.  But highly molecular
polyvinylpyridine salts obtained with the help of sponta-
neous  polymeryzation  of QVPS are the most efficient
flocculants.
   So the utilization of HPS-II flocculant with 700000
molecular weight permit the  treatment of waste water
containing acid  dyes, petroleum products, dissolved and
emulsificated organic substances  for 95-100%. The  re-
sults of using of synthesized polyelectrolytes for  indus-
trial wastes treatment are given in  the  report "Investi-
gation   of  the waste water  treatment  with flocculant
utilization" made by I.N. Myasnikov;  L.V. Gandurina;
and L.N. Butseva.
LITERATURE

1.   V.A.  Kabanov, T.I. Patrikeeva; V.A. Kargin; The report of
       USSR Academy of Sciences, 168, 6, 1350 (1966)
2.   V.A.  Kabanov, O.V. Kargin;  V.A.  Petrovakaya.  Highly
       molecular compounds, 13, 1, 348 (1971)
3.   V.R.  Georgieva; V.P. Zubov; V.A. Kabanov. The Report of
       USSR Academy of Sciences, 190, 5, 1128(1970)
                                                       80

-------
         Physical - Chemical Treatment of Wastewaters from the petroleum Refininj - Petrochemical Industry*
                                        by
                                        William J. Lacy and Allen Cywin**
Introduction
   Let us define  wastes, for the  moment, as misplaced
resources of human industry. I say momentarily because
all wastes have use  in  some  time frame  and in some
ecosystem. The time frame is impacted by technology
and  need,  time,  need,  place, and technology then, all
determine  the scope  of  industrial  wastes problems.
Yesterday's moldy  bread  is today's  penicillin.  Last
month's  paper mill  wastes could be tomorrow's road
binding materials, cooking sauces, medicinals, or acti-
vated carbon.  Pollutants may, therefore, be considered
as the wrong substances  in the wrong places at the wrong
time.
   Industrial   wastes  are  principal   point  sources  of
controllable waterborne  wastes. In terms of the generally
quoted measurements of BOD5 for strength and volume,
the  gross wastes of manufacturing establishments are
about three times greater than those  of the U.S. sewered
population. Moreover, the rate of U.S. industrial produc-
tion, which gives  rise to  industrial wastes, is increasing at
about 4.5 percent per year or over four times faster than
the  population growth  rate. Add to this the extensive
variations of composition of industrial  wastes, and one
realizes that the solution to industrial water pollution is
of paramount  importance  in the environmental protec-
tion effort.
   Some  large  refining and petrochemical  plants in the
United States  treat their wastes economically. However,
the use of the  same  technology may not be economical
for  the  treatment  of wastes produced in similar  but
smaller plants.
   At present, some  34  refineries discharge their wastes
to the community sewer system  and depend upon the
municipal sewage plant for the  treatment. However,
most refineries  do  not  have sewer systems readily
available  and  thus  must  provide  their own treatment
facilities. It thus becomes important that more econom-
ical  methods for  the treatment of control of wastes be
developed by  industry.   Ideally,  a process for treating
wastes from an industry  should:

   1. Effect the  removal of the  pollutant at minimum
cost.
* Presentation of the Joint  US-USSR meeting on P-C treat-
ment, Cincinnati, Ohio November 1975.
** Respectively, Principal Engineering Science Advisor, Office
of Research and Development and Director Effluent Guidelines
Development Division Office,  EPA, Washington, D.C. 20460
   2.  Provide   for  the  economical  recovery  of  any
valuable by- or co-products.
   3.  Comprise  a  technique  that would  permit  the
recycling of recovered materials, including water, back
to the production operation.
   4.  Be simple and require minimum operating labor.
   5.  Require relatively low capital investment.

   Reduction  of  industrial waste discharges is often
accomplished efficiently  and  economically by process
modivications,  improved  housekeeping,  and   reuse-
recycle water management practices. During the period
1954-1968,  total  water  use  by  all  U.S. industries
increased 70 percent, but water intake only increased 34
percent. All U.S. industries achieved a reuse ratio 2.30 in
1968. The plants with the 20  best recycling  rates in
1970  have very high recycling rates because of low  raw
water dissolved solids, low ambient air temperatures, and
use of high temperature  cooling, all of  which permit
higher recycle  ratio  (2).  By  contrast,  the  Organic
Chemicals Industry  (which  includes the petrochemical
industry and is categorized herein by SIC 2815: Cyclic
Organic Chemicals) had a  reuse ratio of 1.90 in 1968, a
net decrease of 4 percent over that of  1964  census.
Although  the  total  water usage increased only  20
percent, water intake increased 25 percent, indicating an
ineffective  utilization by this  industry  of potential
recycled water and/or multiple use of water. In compari-
son, petroleum refining has  achieved an  average reuse
ratio of 5.25 in 1968, an increase of 63  percent since
1954.
   In  1970, industry produced  15.3 trillion gallons of
wastewater, compared to 5.3  trillion  gallons for the
sewered population of the U.S. (3). The industry process
water use  only was equivalent to 63  percent  of all
domestic consumption (4). It  would appear that exten-
sive wastewater reuse by industry should, therefore, have
a substantial impact on water conservation in the U.S.
This is of particular significance now in water shortage
areas and, in the future, in water-abundant areas.
   Although water reuse  has  remained  essentially con-
stant  during  1964-1968  for  the Organic  Chemicals
Industry, absolute and substantial  increases in the reuse
ratio are potentially possible under appropriate circum-
stances.  Past  occurences  of  water reuse  have been
motivated by the pressures of limited water supply, poor
water quality, and more recently, environmental consid-
erations.  The  latter, particularly in  view  of  existing
legislation, should accelerate  the  trend  in the  near
future.
   Gross water  demand  projections  for  the next  50
years  were  made  on the  basis  of  industry  growth
                                                      81

-------
projections and on the assumption that the goal of
pollution  discharge"  is  achievable by the vear  1
(Table  1).
                                   year
                                         'no
                                        1985
1970
1985
2000
2020
                TABLE 1
GROSS WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS

     Gross
Water Demand Consumption    Intake Discharge
              (Billion gallons per day)
   11.6          0.42         4.20      4.8
   23.2          0.84         0.84       0
   35.8          1.30         1.30       0
   72.4          2.62         2.62       0
   It is obvious that after achieving closed loop systems
by 1985 that the volume of intake required approaches
being equal to consumption.
   After 1985,  intake rates are expected to increase in
direct  relation  with  industrial  production  and  gross
water demand.
   Now,  let  us speak more  explicitly of the  petro-
chemical and petroleum refining industries. The major
sources  of pollution in these industries may be deline-
ated as shown (5):
    1. Crude oil processing: distillation; desalting
    2. Cracking Processes:  catalytic and thermal; coking
    3. Hydrotreating
    4. Petrochemical operations
    5. Lube oil manufacturing
    6. Boiler and cooling tower blowdowns
    7. Sour water stripping
    8. Contaminated storm runoff
    9. Intake water treatment
   10. Storage and transfer
   11. Leaks and spills

Such wastewaters may  contain various salts, acids and
alkalies, ammonia,  sulfides, solids, and  mixtures of
organics of varying biodegradability, phenols and other
taste- and odor-producing chemicals, and heavy and light
oils. Furthermore, wastewaters so generated typically
exhibit a BOD and COD range of 100 to 10,000 mg/1
and 200 to 15,000 mg/1, respectively, with an average of
1,150 mg/1 BOD and 3,100 mg/1 COD (6), (7), which is
                       TABLE 2. TYPICAL REFINERY AND PETROCHEMICAL WASTEWATER
                                           CHARACTERISTICS (7) (8) (9)
             Petrochemical
             Principal Products
             Phenol, Ethylene
             Aery Ion itrile
             Fatty Acids, Esters, Glycerol
             Azo & Anthraquinone dyes
             Ethylene, Alcohols, Phenol
             Acrylonitrile, Acetonitrile, Hydrogen Cyanide
             Butadiene, Alkalate, MEK, Styrene, Maleic Anhydride
             Butadiene, Maleic Acid, Fumaric Acid,
             Tetrahydrophthalic Anhydride
             Phenols
             Acids, Formaldehyde, Acetone,
             Methanol, Ketones, Nitric
                 Acid, Nylon Salt, Vinyl
                 Acetate, Actaldehyde
             Isocyanates, Polyols, Urethane
                 Foam
             Acetaldehyde
             Ethylene, Propylene, Butadiene,
                 Alpha Olefins, Polyethylenes
             Butylene Isomers, Butadiene,
                 Maleic Anhydride, Fumaric
                 Acid, Tetrahydrophthalic
                 Anhydride, Alkalate, Aldehydes, Alcohol

              Refinery — Class A
              Refinery — Class B
              Refinery — Class C
              Refinery — Class D
              Refinery - Class E
                                                          Waste Flow   BOD
                                                             mgd

                                                             2.0
                                                             0.302
                                                             0.10
                                                             0.94
                                                             5.9
                                                             3.9
                                                             2.0
                                                             3.605

                                                             0.215
                                                             3.46
                                                             0.57

                                                             1.15
                                                             0.750

                                                             1.50
                                                              .22
                                                              .99
                                                             2.98
                                                             4.35
                                                             7.93
                                                                             mg/1
                                 COD
                                 mg/1
           SS
          mg/1
300
—
10,000
352
1,700
390
1,870
959
1,200
1,200
14,000
1,760
3,600
830
—
1,525
300
239
—
152
610
106
10
-
                       6,600
                         530
                         421

                      20,000
                         155

                        1,960
                          20
                         250
                         300
                         160
                         200
13,200
10,130
 1,200

50,000
   380

 2,980
   120
   750
 1,080
   510
   520
160
 50

200
120
 40
180
240
130
 90
                                                    82

-------
indicative of the strength of the wastewaters. In Table 2
are listed some typical wastewater characteristics result-
ing from these industries.
   The  treatment of  wastewaters  from refineries  and
organic chemicals manufacture becomes apparent  with
evaluation of the nature of waste to be treated — that of
its   relative   biodegradability  and  normally  higher
strength. Figure 1 is an empirical diagrammatic represen-
tation  of the biodegradability of wastes encountered in
this portion of petrochemical  industry.  Organics in
general and  petrochemicals in particular may be charac-
terized typically as to their respective abilities to degrade
biochemically:  Type  (a)  classical log growth  curve,
similar to domestic waste; Type (b) requiring a longer lag
or  retention time  for  the  enzymatic  systems of the
micro-organisms  to become  more fully developed  — a
semi-biodegradable  waste; Type  (c) a  long period of
"seed"   acclimation  required before  assimilation  of
organics  proceeds — a semi-refractory waste; and Type
(d) essentially no biochemical action due to a refractory
waste.  Petrochemical wastewaters generally fall into the
range of a type (b)-Type (c) waste  as  depicted by the
cross-hatched  area  in  the figure. Several explanations
have been postulated for this anomalous behavior (11):
(a) reaction rates of individual components (organics)
may differ markedly, (b) the bio-mass present may not
utilize  some of the constituents  due to the absence of
the proper enzymes (catabolic and biosynthetic enzymes
and permeases  must all be present in proper concentra-
tions), and (c) there may exist materials causing inhibi-
tion or repression (interference in the natural metabolic
pathway). An additional factor that must be taken into
account, and one that may be the most significant, is the
formation of  intermediates and end-products of meta-
bolic pathways that diffuse out of or are released by cell
lysis. These products may exhibit a profound effect on
the  biodegradability of the waste. Extracellular quan-
tities of these intermediates and metabolites often  are
indistinguishable from the original waste components,
and due to the non-specificity of either the BOD or COD
analysis,  such a  change  in  concentration  cannot  be
monitored directly and "a waste which is biodegradable
may appear to be  'hard'  because of the intermediates
which have passed  into the  medium during the  given
detention time" (11, p. R488). Table 3 contains a list of
24 organic  compounds found to be  biorefractory (12).
Similar compounds have been identified in the municipal
raw water intakes (Mississippi River and tributaries) and/
or  finished  water  supplies at  or near  New Orleans,
Louisiana  (13).  Therefore, it  is apparent  from  the
previous  discussion  that  petrochemical  and  refinery
waste treatment practices present the  environmental/
chemical  design  engineer  with a formidable challenge
including what  physical-chemical treatment  process to
utilize.

 TABLE 3.  REFRACTORY INDUSTRIAL WASTES (12).
*nitrobenzene
 trichloroethane
 tetrachloroethylene
 chloroethyl ether
 chloromethyl ethyl ether
 chloropyridine
 chloronitrobenzene
 dichloroethyl ether
"benzene
*toluene
 camphor
 veratrole (1, 2-ditnethoxy
   benzene)
 guaiacol (methoxy phenol)
 borneol (bornyl alcohol)
 isoborneol
*ethylene dichloride
 chloiobenzene
 bromobenzene
 dichlorobenzene
 bromochlorobenzene
*ethylbenzene
 chloroform
*styrene
 isopropylbenzene
 butylbenzene
 dibromobenzene
*isocyanic acid
*methylchloride
 bromophenylphenyl ether

*dinitrotoluene
 methylbiphenyl
 acetone
 2-ethylhexanol
 2-benzothiozole
                 TYPES OF PETROCHEMICAL WASTEY'CvTER
                 AND THEIR RELATIVE BIODEGRADAB'LITY
                 (10)
"These compounds also have been found to impart taste and
odor to drinking water supplies in trace amounts (13).

      There are indications that industry  is well aware
of  the  benefits of recyling  cooling  tower blowdowns
(14).  One such example concerns  a Class "E" refinery
where "the  cooling towers  are  used  to reduce  the
concentration of organics and  to  concentrate  the un-
desirable precipitates. Thus,  all  wastewaters originating
from  plant operations and storm water runoff are either
recycles into the process streams and reused or recycled
in the cooling towers" (15,p.  242). If wastewater reuse is
developed and implemented to its maximum potential, it
could provide  industry  with  a  viable technique  for
pollution control, which could conceivably be the  least
expensive  alternative  for fulfilling  future  regulatory
requirements. In fact, if no discharges of wastewater are
achievable and practicable, the need to obtain a  permit
                                                       83

-------
                 TABLE 4     NET RAW WASTE LOADS FROM PETROLEUM REFINING
                               INDUSTRY CATEGORIES (50 Percent Probability of Occurrence)

                                     KILOGRAMS/1000 M3 (LB/1000 BBLS)
                 SUBCATEGORY      BODS       OIL/GREASE   PHENOL        AMMONIA
                 TOPPING
                 CRACKING
                 PETROCHEMICAL
                 LUBE
                 INTEGRATED
to discharge effluents would be precluded. Add to this
the water conservation aspect and the potential savings
resulting from reduced effluent monitoring,  and the
total recycle concept has even greater appeal.
   As shown  in  Table 4  the largest percentage  of the
waste load entering our waterways is derived  from the
more complex types of refinery operations. It should be
evident that more than half of each of the five important
water pollution  loads  originate  from  Class  D  to  E
refineries.
   The data presented in Table 5 show that Class D and
E refineries account for about one third of U.S. refining
capacity. It is, therefore,  evident  that, generally speak-
ing,  unit waste loading per barrel of crude processed
increases with increasing refinery  complexity.  This
would indicate the need for higher efficiency  pollution
control  systems for the more complex refinery  as
necessary, should it be desired to achieve  the same water
discharge load per  unit of capacity as for less complex
refineries. This data also indicate that the more complex
refineries have larger capacities  and are the larger point
sources of waste loads.
3.43(1.2)
72.93(25.5)
171.6(60)
217(76)
197(69)
8.29(2.9)
31.17(10.9)
52.91(18.5)
120.1(42)
75(26)
                                                   0.034(0.012)
                                                   4.00(1.4)
                                                   7.72(2.7)
                                                   8.3(2.9)
                                                   3.8(1.3)
                                                   1.20(0.42)
                                                   28.31(9.9)
                                                   34.32(12)
                                                   24.1(8.5)
                                                   20.5(7.2)
                                        TABLE 5.  DISTRIBUTION OF REFINING CAPACITY
                                                BY REFINERY COMPLEXITY (9)
                                       Refinery
                                       Classification

                                         A
                                         B
                                         C
                                         D
                                         E
                                     Number of   Capacity   % of Total U.S.
                                     Refineries    MBCPD   Crude Capacity
                                         13
                                         72
                                         27
                                         11
                                         13
                                              13
                                              46
                                             116
                                              92
                                             227
                                                  2
                                                 25
                                                 25
                                                  8
                                                 24
                                         Table 6 shows treatment control efficiencies possible
                                       with  use  of applicable technologies such as biological
                                       systems and activated carbon adsorption, as compared to
                                       the overall industry average being achieved at this time.
                                       It illustrates that substantial improvements to pollution
                                       control may  be attained by  the  refining industry by
                                       application  of  either well-demonstrated  technology
                                       (biological systems)  or newer and emerging physical-
                                       chemical  technology  such as  activated  carbon adsorp-
                                       tion.
TABLE 6
Typical Removal Efficiencies for Oil Refinery Treatment Processes
                  PROCESS	
                  INFLUENT  BOD5   COD    TOC
                                                     REMOVAL EFFICIENCY
                                          ss
                                    OIL    PHENOL AMMONIA SULFIDE
API Separator
Clarifier
Raw Waste
1
5-40
30-60
5-30
20-50
NA
NA
10-50
50-80
60-99
60-95
0-50
0-50
NA
NA
NA
NA
Dissolved Air
Flotation
Filter
Oxidation Pond
Aerated Lagoon
Activative Sludge

Tpickling Filter
Cooling Tower
Activated Carbon

Filter
Granular Media
Activated Carbon

Data Not Available
    1
    1
    1
    2,3,4
    2,3,4

    1
    2,3,4
    2,3,4
   5-9
   5-9 plus 11
20-70
40-70
40-95
75-95
80-99

60-85
50-90
70-95
 NA
91-98
10-60
20-55
30-65
60-85
50-95

30-70
40-90
70-90
 NA
86-94
 NA
 NA
 60
 NA
40-90

 NA
10-70
50-80
50-65
50-80
50-85
75-95
20-70
40-65
60-85

60-85
50-85
60-90
75-95
60-90
10-85
65-90
50-90
70-90
80-99

50-80
60-75
75-95
65-95
70-95
10-75
 5-20
60-99
90-99
95-99+

70-98
75-99+
90-100
 5-20
90-99
 NA
 NA
0-15
10-45
33-99

15-90
60-95
 7-33
 NA
33-87
 NA
 NA
70-100
95-100
97-100

70-100
 NA
 NA
 NA
 NA
                                                    84

-------
   In addition to  wastewater  treatment  technology,
refineries  also  have  pollution  control concerns  with
process  sludges, waste chemicals and thermal discharges
in the form  of  cooling water.  The question of toxic,
hazardous, and/or taste and odor constituents in refinery
discharges of any sort must also be faced.

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

   Table 7 illustrates the technological areas that are, in
general, pertinent to effective pollution control for the
Organic Chemicals  and Petroleum  Refining  Industries.
The  specific  solutions available to each plant will be
determined by several factors—and  economics (overall
economics) will  oftentimes be  the  most  important of
these. By and large,  one must  recognize  the need to
detoxify and/or degrade toxic wastes, control discharges
of nutrients  and  salts (possibly  through  by-product
recovery techniques), and reduce or eliminate inadver-
tent  high strength wastewater releases to quantities that
                             produce  little  or no ecological  effects on  receiving
                             streams.  Where the receiving waters are too sensitive to
                             any  permissible waste discharge, the development  and
                             implementation of "no discharge" systems of pollution
                             control may be required as the means to meet local or
                             national  environmental standards (presently and in the
                             future).
                                Physical  and  chemical  and lower cost methods of
                             control will, of necessity, continue to be developed and
                             demonstrated.  Improving  performance  and upgrading
                             existing  treatment technology in conjunction  with sup-
                             plemental  advanced   wastewater  treatment  physico-
                             chemical add-on processes (i.e., tertiary treatment) may
                             be necessary, particularly for special side streams diffi-
                             cult  to treat by biological methods, as well as alternative
                             methods  for  implementation  by both old  and  new
                             facilities.  Sludges  and chemical wastes, specific pollu-
                             tants, (e.g., halogenated hydrocarbons, heavy and toxic
                             metals, etc.,) and comprehensive water pollution control
                             methods, including regionahzation, also must be further
TABLE 7.   POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY STATUS IN THE PETROCHEMICAL
            AND PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRIES.
Technology
Biological oxidation
              NEED FOR
Research  Development  Demonstration
                             some
               some
                                                         yes
Sludge disposal
 yes
yes
yes
Advanced treatment
                             yes
                                           yes
                              yes
Closed loop systems
Comprehensive approach
 yes
                                           yes
               yes
               yes
               yes
                              Applications & Objectives
(1) Multi-stage biox systems
(?) To achieve and maintain 90-95%
   BOD removal for single stage systems.
(3) Need pre- and post-treatment process/
   operations to improve performance
   and reliability of both single- and
   multi-stage Biox.

(1) Solids disposal:
   a) Land assimulation
   b) Incineration (fuel value)
   c) Catalytic oxidation
   d) Solvent extraction
   e) Wet oxidation and pyrolysis

(1) Biox alternatives
(2) To achieve and maintain 95-99%
   pollutant reductions
(3) By- and co-product recovery
(4) Refractory organic removal
(5) Biox supplement

(1) No discharge (closed cycled systems)
(2) Cost of water
(3) Water  conservation and resue
(4) Containment of trace toxic chemicals

(1) Total environmental effects
(2) Basin planning
(3) Joint treatment
(4) Synergistic benefits
                                                      85

-------
developed and improved.
   As a result of the EPA perspective of the state-of-the-
art, the Industrial Pollution Control program developed
to date in the Petroleum Refining and Organic Chemicals
Industries is depicted in Table 8. In recent years, a total
of 29 grants/contracts  have  been awarded covering
RD&D projects  concerned with wastewater characteriza-
tion and treatment costs, base level of treatment (biox),
advanced waste treatment applications,  and recovery
(by-product and recycle/reuse) techniques. EPA support
amounted to $5,428,700 or 47 percent of total estimat-
 ed project costs of $ 11,481,600.
   One recently completed development project (Project
No. 12020 EEQ) resulted in the successful operation of
a completely mixed activated sludge process for treat-
ment of a  propylene glycol process wastewater. This
wastewater  was  characterized  by a high salt content
(8-10 percent  NaCl), a  pH of  11-12, relatively high
concentrations of the glycol (500-1,000 mg/1), together
with small  quantities of  related  reaction products (in
concentrations  amounting  to  less  than 100  gm/1),
namely, the oxide, the dichloride, the chlorohydrin, the
                  TABLE 8. EPA RDGD GRANTS FOR POLLUTION CONTROL IN THE
                   PETROLEUM REFINING AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES
Grantee
C.W. Rice**
Engineering Science**
Engineering Science**
E.I. du Pont
State of Louisiana
MCA
Union Carbide
State of Louisiana

Datagraphics**

Univ. of California
Texas A&M Univ.
Univ. of Missouri

Ga. Tech.

Union Carbide
Dow Chemical
Celanese
Dow Chemical

State of Louisiana
Dow Chemical

Delaware R.B.C.

Union Carbide
B. F. Goodrich
Dow Chemical
State of Alabama
CIBA - Geigy
General Tire & Rubber
International Ozone Inst.
Dow Chemical
Union Carbide
TOTAL
Total Cost
($1,000)
56.3
11.2
17.0
874.5
69.0
60.0
67.1
67.3

6.7

86.7
38.5
38.5

76.1

314.9
282.5
600.0
226.6

827.6
196.4

995.7

554.1
823.1
1300.4
989.5
1268.3
938.7
15.0
181.1
498.8
11481.6
EPA Grant
($1,000)
56.3
11.2
17.0
150.1
48.3
42.0
46.9
32.5

6.7

81.2
34.9
36.4

71.4

220.4
197.7
395.3
142.3

457.8
108.3

646.7

231.8
364.9
509.8
314.5
392.6
461.9
8.0
110.0
231.8
5428.7
Primary Effort Technological
R DV DM Objectives
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X

X
X
X

X






X










X
X


Treatment costs-general
Wastewater characteristics
State of the Art
Ocean dispersal of salt waste
Recovery: Membrane systems
Effects of Ci2 on treated organics
X *Biox: Anaerobic inhibitors
Concentration of wastes by
dialysis
Treatment costs-organics
Recovery: Volatile solvent extrac-
tion of organics
Recovery : Solvent extraction
AWT: Carbon sorption &
regeneration
AWT: Radiation treatment of high
strength chlorocarbon wastes
X X *Biox: Refractory organic wastes
X Biox: Polyhydric/saline wastes
X Biox: Chloraldehyde wastes
X Biox: Optimization thru
automation
X AWT: Refractory chlorocarbon wastes
X AWT: UV Cl2 of organic acids in
waste brines
X AWT: Joint industrial/municipal
wastes
X Recovery: Cooling water blowdowns
X Biox: PVC wastes
X AWT: Phenol/Acetic acid waste brines
X Deep well disposal of wastes
X *Biox: Plastic media trickling filters
X Recovery: Distillation for renovation
AWT: Ozone
X Zero discharge: R.O.— Electrodialysis
X X Zero discharge: voided processes

** Contract   * Multi-stage systems
                                                    86

-------
chlorinated  ether, and  some acetol and acetic acid.  A
unique mixed culture, which tolerates high salt content
and  utilizes glycols  as  the  only  carbon  source,  was
developed; however,  an acclimation  period  of  6 to 8
weeks was required. TOD removal efficiencies of over 90
percent were obtained at retention times of 8.0 to 9.0
hours and loadings of 2.0 to 3.0 Ibs TOD/lb MLVSS-day.
Based upon  such favorable results and  the demonstration
of the  consistent  reliability  of  the TOD  and  TOC
parameters for correct interpretation of the behavior and
fate  of the  organics in  the wastewaters  and for the
evaluation of the treatment process, a subsequent grant
was  awarded (Project No. 800766) to develop control
systems such that an activated sludge process could be
operated  as efficiently  as a  chemical  process on  a
continuous  basis; the premise  being that the  perfor-
mance  of an activated  sludge  process  can be  further
improved  and its  reliability increased  under steady state
conditions.  Such  conditions  can only be  achieved  by
instrumentation   to  control:  (a)  the food  to  micro-
organism ratio  in the aeration vessel; (b) the nitrogen
and  phosphorus  requirements; and  (c)  the biomass/
organics  reaction temperature.  An additional require-
ment included the development of a dependable biologi-
cal toxic detector to sense and eliminate (through proper
feed forward and feed  backward controls, the influent
wastewater  may  be  temporarily  diverted to a holding
basin)  a toxic substance  prior to its  entry into the
aeration basin.
   More recently, efforts are being directed toward the
development and  evaluation  of  improved  physico-
chemical  techniques,  both for  pretreatment,  special
segregated side streams, and tertiary  treatment  supple-
mentation for, or as alternatives to, biological systems.
Also, the emphasis continues to be placed upon closed-
loop water reuse technology and  by-product recovery.
There exists  today in an area of southwestern Puerto
Rico, a  large integrated refinery/petrochemical complex,
including  an  electrical generating  facility. The  cumula-
tive  wastewater discharge exceeds 400 MGD (cooling,
process, and   boiler  feed blowdowns)  which  includes
excess heat,   organic  matter,  suspended  solids,  total
nitrogen and  ammonia, oil and grease, and phenol. The
petrochemical complex produces  775 million  #/yr of
ethylene and  derivative products, including butadiene,
ethylene  oxide,  phenol,  cumene, polyethylene, bis
phenol-A, plasticizers, refined ethylene and diethylene
glycols,  ethyl-hexanol,  istobutanol, and butanol  (23)
(24); whereas the integrated refinery processes approxi-
mately 175,000 bbls/day of crudes for the production of
aviation and   motor gasoline, jet  fuel, kerosene,  disel
cyclohexane, isobutanol, propylene, and ethylene(23). It
should be noted that a large percentage of the  total
wastewater flow is cooling water. A grant (Project No.
801398) for a water reuse project  has been awarded by
EPA. The demonstration phase of the proposed study,
which  entails  the  utilization  of  an  optimized AWT
system  that will  deliver treated  water  for use  in heat
transfer  systems, will  be  conducted  at Ponce, Puerto
Rico. One of the major objectives  of this project will be
to  provide  quality  criteria  for  water usage  in  the
petro-chemical industry, including quality  criteria that
TABLE 8.
Grantee
Univ. of Okla.
Texas A&M

Harvard
Illinois Tech
API

A-D-M Co.
American Oil

Shell Oil
American Oil

American Oil

Atlantic-
Richfield Oil

BPOil

TOTALS
Total Est.
Cost ($1000)
18
234

16
12
85

245
355

100
1738

226

1160


2625

6844
EPA Grant
($1000)
14
40

15
35
51

107
170

70
337

74

275


350

1538
Primary
R&D
yes
yes

yes
yes
yes

yes
yes

-







yes on
water
reuse
Effort
Demo





Pilot
Plant
yes
yes

yes
yes

yes

yes


yes


Technology
State of the Art
Catalyzed Oxidation of Phenol and
Amines
Pretreatment for Biox (Oil removal)
Pretreatment for Biox (Oil removal)
Improved Biox Assimulation
of oil
Pretreatment for Biox (Oil removal)
Oily Sludge and Chemicals Disposal
(fluid bed incineration)
Oily sludge disposal (soil cultivation)
Post-treatment for Biox (chem coag,
dissolved air flotation)
Post-treatment for Biox (mixed media
filtration)
Advanced treatment
(Activated carbon with joint treatment
alternate)
Advanced treatment (Rapid Sand
Filtration with Activated Carbon)

                                                       87

-------
are limiting factors with respect  to  reuse of renovated
wastewaters, namely boiler-ffed  water,  cooling water,
service water, and process water. The successful comple-
tion of this project will  have immediate  and obvious
impact on the environment of south  central and western
Puerto Rico, and it is anticipated that the results should
show that a significant step can be achieved toward total
recycle and reuse of petrochemical wastewaters.
   In a  recent grant with the Dow Chemical Company
(Project No. 803085)  the  problem of  zero  discharge
from petrochemical plants is being studied. This project
will  focus  on the removal  of refractory organic con-
taminants  and  the  recovery  of industrially reusable
brines by a reverse  osmosiselectrodialysis process. The
proposed  use  of these brines  is  in the  production
chlorine which can be  utilized for production back in
the plant.  If successful, this  project will  evaluate the
total reuse of petrochemical wastewaters.
   The main objective of total water pollution control
within an Organic Chemicals Industrial complex is based
on  the  concept  that  water pollution  abatement  and
water conservation are economically compatible, partic-
ularly for the  long term.  As water availability becomes
more critical,  the reuse of water will  be dictated  by
economics,  with  attendant  inherent  treatment costs
merely a normal operating expense.
   A  Los Angeles area refinery impounds  the periodic
storm flow, treats it by contact with granular activated
carbon,  and then discharges  it  into  a  local channel.
Because of the highly seasonal nature of the rainfall, it is
essential that the  treatment system  be able to start up
and  shut down without delay  or difficulty. Of course,
this  eliminated any  possibility for the use  of biological
systems. The operation of this plant demonstrated the
reliability, economics, and efficiency  of activated carbon
treatment of wastewaters on an intermittent basis.
   At another refinery, the full  scale  activated  carbon
plant was not performing  as well as had been expected.
The  addition  of  a  Bio-Disk  pilot  plant prior  to the
carbon  columns greatly improved the  effluent quality.
This follows logically, since the  hydrocarbons that are
not removable by activated carbon (polar molecules) are
highly biodegradable.  The  reverse is  also  true, those
materials that are refractory usually show amenability to
carbon removal.
   In another  recently  completed grant (12050 EZG)),
the disposal of oily sludges from petroleum refineries by
land  spreading  was evaluated. Some micro-organisms
normally present  in soil  will attack petroleum hydro-
carbons and utilize them as their sole source of carbon.
Poorly aerated soils  become anaerobic, and under these
conditions, the micro-organisms decompose oily material
very slowly. Aeration of soil by frequent cultivation is a
means of supplying oxygen  essential for the more rapid
acting aerobic microbes. Temperature,  moisture,  soil
properties, oily  sludge properties, and nutrient content
all  influence the rate at which  the hydrocarbons  are
decomposed.
   According to an EPA national analysis of the indus-
try, the attainable concentrations from  the application
of  best practicable control technology  currently avail-
able aie shown on table 9.

                      Table 9

     Attainable Concentrations from the Application of
   Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available
     Parameter

     BOD5
     COD
     TOC
     ss
     O&G
     Phenol
     NH3-N
     Sulfide
     CrT
     Cr6
Concentration mg/1

   15
   80-115
   (2.2XBOD,)
   10        5
    5
   0.1
   2-10
   0.1
   .25
   .005
CONCLUSION

   The  Research,  Development, and  Demonstration
grants program of EPA has been implemented to meet
current  and emerging needs for water pollution control
and energy conservation in the Petroleum Refining and
Organic Chemicals Industries.
   Since the trend  toward industrial water  reuse has
already  commenced (e.g., the Petroleum Refining Indus-
try), the exception ocurring in some areas of the Organic
Chemicals  Industry, acceleration of  the trend  would
provide  a sound  basis for future industrial expansion.
Since current and future environmental standards are
expected  to  increase  greatly  the pressures to reduce
dramatically, or eliminate altogether, pollutional loads
and effluent discharges, reuse and recycle to the point of
providing  an  industrial  closed water cycle  should be
planned. On  this point,  Federal legislation calls for the
elimination of the discharge of pollutants into navigable
waters by  1985, as a goal.
                                                      88

-------
                                                     REFERENCES
 1. Industrial Water  Reuse Future Pollution Solution, G. Key,
   W.J. Lacy, A.  Cywin, Environmental  Science  and Tech-
   nology, Sept.  1971.
 2. 1967 Census of Manufacturers: Water Reuse in Manufactur-
   ing, April 1971, U.S. Department of Commerce.
 3. Achieving Pollution  Abatement, K.L.  Kollar and  Robert
   Brewer,  Construction Review, Department of Commerce,
   Vol. 19, No. 7, July 1973.
 4. The Water Encyclopedia,  O.K.  Todd, ed.,  1970. Water
   Information Center, Port Washington, New York.
 5. Minimizing Waste in  the Petrochemical  Industry, S.K.
   Mencher, 1967, Chemical Engineering Progress, Vol. 63, No.
   10, pp. 83-84.
 6. Petrochemical Effluents  Treatment  Practices,  Summary
   Report, February 1970. Engineering  Science, Inc., Austin,
   Texas,  FWPCA Contract No. 14-12461, pp. 35-37.
 7. Projected Wastewater Treatment Costs in the Organic Chem-
   ical Industry, July 1971. Datagraphics,  Inc., Pittsburg, Pa.,
   EPA Project No.  12020 GND, p. 54.
 8. Extended Aeration  Activated  Sludge Treatment of Petro-
   chemical Wastes  at the Houston Plant of Petro-Tex Chemical
   Corporation,  Pruessner, R.D.  and Mancini, J., 1966. Paper
   presented at  the 21st Annual Purdue Industrial Waste
   Conference, May 1966, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indi-
   ana, p.  2.
 9. Petroleum  Industry  Raw Waste  Load  Survey, December
   1972. Committee on Environmental Affairs, American Petro-
   leum Institute, 1801 K. Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
10. The EPA Program for Environmental Control in  the United
   States  and Puerto Rican Petrochemical Industry,  desRosiers,
   P.E., and G.  Rey,  1972.  Papter  presented at the Water
   Pollution Control Federation Reconvened Session, San Juan,
   Puerto Rico, October 15-18.
11. Factors Responsible  for Non-Biodegradability of Industrial
   Wastes, Irvine, R.L. and A.W. Busch, 1969, JWPCF, Vol. 41,
   No. 11, Part 2, pp. R482491.
12. EPA Research and Tertiary Treatment, Myers, L.H. and L.F.
   Mayhue,  1972. Paper presented at the 65th Annual AIChE
   Meeting,  November 26-30,  1972, New York City,  P.4.
13. Industrial Pollution  of  the   Lower Mississippi River in
   Louisiana, 1972. EPA Region  VI, Dallas, Texas. Surveillance
   and Analysis Division, April 1972.
14. Industrial Water  Closed Cycles  Research Progress and Needs,
   Rey, G. and W.L. Lacy, 1972. Paper presented at September
   12, 1972, Seminar:  Closed Cycle  Operations by Industry,
   Rider College, Trenton, New Jersey.
15. Water  Reuse  in  Industry,  Gloyna,  E.F., D.L. Ford, and J.
   Eller, 1970. JWPCF, Vol. 42, No. 2, Part  1, pp. 237-242.
16. Pilot Plant Activated Carbon Treatment of Petroleum Re-
   finery  Wastewaters, Short, T.E. and L.H. Myers, Robert S.
   Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,  Ada,  Oklahoma.
17. Anaerobic Treatment  of Synthetic Organic Wastes,  January
   1972.  Union Carbide Corporation, South Charleston, West
   Virginia,  EPA Project  No. 12020 DIS.
18. Treatment of Wastewater from the Production of Polyhydric
   Organics,  October 1971.  The Dow Chemical  Company,
   Freeport, Texas,  EPA Project No.  12020  EEQ.
19. Biological Treatment  of Chlorophenolic Wastes, June 1971.
   The City of Jacksonville, Arkansas, EPA Project  No. 12130
   EGK.
20. Interim Report - Deepwater Pilot Plant Treatability Study,
   July 1971. Delaware River Basin Commission, Trenton, New
   Jersey, EPA Project No. 12130 DRO.
21. Anaerobic Degradation of Selected Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
   Pesticides, Hill, D.W. and P.L. McCarty, 1967. JWPCF, Vol.
   39, No. 8, pp. 1259-1977.
22. Biological Degradation of  Tertiary Butyl Alcohol, Horn,
   J.A., J.E. Moyer, and J.H. Hale, 1970. Paper presented at the
   25th Annual Purdue Industrial Conference, Purdue Univer-
   sity, Lafayette,  Indiana.
23. Environmental  Effectus of Petrochemical Waste Discharges
   of  Tallaboa and Guaynilla Bays, Puerto  Rico, Lair,  M.D.,
   R.G. Rogers, and Weldon, M.R.,  1971. Technical Study TS
   03-208-02.  EPA,  Region,  IV,  Surveillance and  Analysis
   Division, Athens, Georgia.
24. Wastewater  Control  Facilities in  a  Petrochemical Plant,
   Rucker, J.E. and R.W. Oeben, 1970. Chemical Engineering
   Progress, Vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 63-66.
                                                            89

-------
              EXAMINATION OF OIL-CONTAINING WASTE WATERS CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
                              AFTER THEIR TREATMENT IN AERATION TANKS.
                                      by V. A. Panova, N. S. Goriatchev and
                                      U. U. Lurie
                                      All-Union Scientific-Research Institute
                                      VODGEO

   On  the basis  of examinations  carried out  at  the
Institute VODGEO waste waters from oil-refining plants
after being treated in aeration  tanks were found still
toxic. To  prevent their detrimental effect on acquatic
life they must be diluted 16-60 times.
   Up  to  now  it was not  possible to  answer what
determines this toxicity  and what kind of substances
present in  waste water is toxic.
   We  should note  that  oil-containing waste  waters
composition is changeable and depends on the degree of
treatment, that  is why  for  determination of organic
substances in biochemically treated oil-containing waste
water four methods of concentrating were used with the
simultaneous division  of organic substances mixture into
several groups depending on chemical  composition  of
separate components: I) extraction by diethyl ether, 2)
adsorbtion on  activated  carbon  with  desorption by
various  solvents,  3) distillation  from alkaline medium
with the application of freezing for neutral compounds
concentrating, 4) distillation from acid medium with the
application of  the same  freezing  process for neutral
compounds.
   In all cases this division is based  upon  specific affinity
of the  mixture  components towards solvents and on
their various acidic and basic properties.
   It had  been  stated before, that evolution  of organic
substances from  biochemically treated oil-containing
waste water by  direct extraction  method with diethyl
ether and  sorption on activated carbon leads for several
reasons  to the considerable loss of some part of volatile
organic  compounds. Besides, at direct extraction method
too low  degree  of organic  compounds removal from
waste waters is obtained owing  to  the fact that many of
these  compounds have low  distribution factor in  the
water - diethyl ether system.
   Schemes developed by the authors were used in the
investigations carried out for  separating  and concentrat-
ing of organic substances from waste water and for their
division into groups.
   According  to  these  schemes  waste  water  to  be
analysed is suggested  to be subjected to thrice-repeated
concentrating in  order to raise extraction efficiency of
organic  substances from water by ether. Separation is
commenced with the  distillation  of volatile bases and
neutral  compounds  from alkaline or  acid  medium.
Therevy all acids and phenols in the form of their salts
remain  concentrated in a small volume of the distillation
residue. The  distillation  residue is being acidified and
extracted repeatedly at water to ether ratio 1:1. At such
extracting practically all volatile acids are being evolved
by ether. All oxy- and polyacids with the distribution
factor =0.1 polyalkohols, aminoacids, sulfoacids, sugars,
urea remain in the water layer. Then separation of acids
from phenols is being conducted, and after this in each
group obtained  further  division on volatile and non-
volatile substances is being carried on.
   The group of organic bases is concentrated the same
way. After acidification of the distillate in which volatile
bases and neutral compounds are present, the latter are
distilled  and salts  of  volatile bases being  repeatedly
extracted  by  ether  after  acidification  remain  in the
distillation  residue in a small  amount. And finally the
group of neutral compounds is subjected to concentrat-
ing by freezing  with their subsequent extraction with
diethyl ether.
   At a slow freezing losses of neutral compounds with
ice were determined to make up no more than 10%. At a
rapid freezing, when the solution is placed directly into
the freezing chamber of the refrigerator,  losses make up
40-50%.
   The  group of hydrophilic compounds   (oxy-  and
polyacids, polyalkohols, sulfoacids, aminoacids, sugars,
urea etc.)  practically  not extracted by ether  (Their
distribution factor  = O.I) is extracted  at first together
with the mineral salts and then after being evaporated
dry is treated by  dewatered ethanol for separation from
mineral  substances.  This group of compounds may be
subjected to further analysis for division into acids, bases
and neutral compounds with the help of cephadexes and
ion-exchange celluloses.
   As a  result  of such treatment  organic compounds
from oil-containing waste waters treated are divided into
four large groups: neutral, acidic, basic and hydrophilic
compounds. These groups are  divided in  their turn into
separate  subgroups:  volatile phenols, non-volatile phe-
nols, volatile acids, non-volatile acids, including naphthe-
nic acids,  volatile  organic bases, non-volatile organic
bases,  volatile  and non-volatile  neutral compounds.
Quantitative characteristics of each separate group of
compounds  evolved  are represented in Table  I. Oil-con-
taining waste water of an oil-refining plant was examined
after being biochemically  treated. The  result  of the
analysis is given in Summary Table 2.
   Analysis of the organic  part of oil-containing waste
water was  not  limited by determination of weight of
separated  groups of organic compounds: investigations
                                                     SO

-------
 Table I   Organic compounds in oil-containing waste water after biochemical treatment.

          Separated groups of compounds
          Neutral            aldehydes and ketones
          compounds        oily substances
                             quinones
                             other neutral compounds
                             The sume of neutral compounds

          Acidic             Strong organic acids         44—67
          compounds        including: volatile
                                      non-volatile
                                      napthenic
                             other non-volatile acids

                             Very weak organic acids      6—8
                             phenols
                             other very weak organic acids
                                  sum total of all acids

          Basic              Basic compounds in the form of
          compounds        hydrochloric salts

                             Compounds soluble in water and
                             not-extracted by ether (aminoacids,
                             oxyacids, sulfoacids, polyalkohols,
                             urea, sugars etc)

                             Sum total of all  organic compounds
                      fluctuation of component
                      during observation period
                      mg/1 (1971, 1972, 1973)

                           1.8-2.0
                           0.8-3.5
                           0.3-1.1
                           6.0-95
                           10-100
                           14-35
                           20-53
                            2-4
                           16-51
                           0.1-3
                           5-8
                           50-75

                           7-55
                           90-102

                           150-330
Table 2    Summarized data of oil-containing waste waters chemical composition.
          Ingredients defined
       Waste water after
sand filtration         biochemical treatment
          Colour
          Odour
          pH
          COD mg 0/1
          BOD, mg 02/1
          oil substances, filtrated, mg/1
          oil substances, non-filtered, mg/1
          Naphthenic acids, mg/1
          Other non-volatile acids, mg/1
          Volatile organic acids, mg/1
          Volatile phenols with vapour, mg/1
          Quinones, mg/1
          Surfactants, mg/1
          Dry residue, mg/1
          Tempered residue, mg/1
          Chlorides (CD, me/1
          Phosphates (PO4^) mg/1
          Sulfates(SO42-), mg/i
          Nitrogen, ammonia mg/1
          Nitrogen, nitrate mg/1
          Nitrogen, nitrite mg/1

          Calcium, mg/1
          Magnesium, mg/1
          Sodium, mg/1
          Potassium, mg/1
          Waste water before treatment in aeration tanks is diluted by sewage
          1.5 - 1.8 times.
dirty-grey
oily
6.9-7.3
270-1050
26-58
—
18-64
8-20
54-140
30-70
1-11
—
8-13
8000-10000
7400-9300
4900-6100
—
_
8-29
0.2-1.3 single
0-0.1 determi-
nations
660
100
340 -
70
light-yellow
light oily
7.2-7.6
80-120
1.6-3.5
0.7-3.5
1.5-5.0
2.0-4.7
15-50
3.0-35
0.01-3.7
0.3-1.1
2.4-6.5
4900-6000
4200-4800
2700-3450
0.6-0.8
43-75
0.4-1.1
7.8-8.4
0.03-0.33

100-370
40-65
200
50
                                             91

-------
were continued within each group. Two very important
groups of  compounds were  tested  in  detail,  that is
neutral and acidic  compounds,  as  they contain sub-
stances causing water  toxicity (quinones,  naphthenic
acids).

Group of Neutral Compounds

   The group contains a  great number of  separate
components,  namely   non-oxidated  hydrocarbones,
ethers  and   esters,  aldehydes,  ketones,   alkohols,
quinones,  anhydrides,  lactones,  fatty  and  aromatic
halogen-bearing compounds.
   Three  groups of neutral compounds were analysed,
namely neutral compounds evolved from water by direct
extraction with diethyl ether; by sorption on activated
carbon and by distillation from acidic and alkaline media
with  the  subsequent concentrating  by  freezing. The
latter method of neutral compounds separation indi-
cated the  presence of more  considerable  amount of
organic compounds  in the group as compared to those
evolved by two other methods. At evolution of neutral
compounds by above mentioned methods their contents
in water  were 21.5, 41  and  100 mg/1  respectively. It
brings the evidence  to the fact, that the used method of
concentrating  of organic compounds by freezing after
removal  of acidic  and  basic  groups of organic  com-
pounds  gives  us  the  possibility to  preserve fully the
high-volatile part of organic compounds, that is neutral
compounds.
   Analysis with the help of IR-spectroscopy has shown
that adsorption spectra of these three groups of neutral
compounds separated from water by various means (by
extraction, sorption and  distillation)  did  not differ
greatly  from  one  another.  The  three  spectra  were
characterized by the presence of a large area of carbonyl
compounds in them.  Spectrum  region at 1680 - 1780
cm"'  testifies  to  the presence of aldehydes, ketones,
esters and lactones.
   Gas chromatographic analysis  of the neutral group of
compounds indicated the presence of 16 components in
it.  In the  group  of  neutral compounds  substances
mentioned below were extracted and defined (see Table
I):
•   aldehydes  and  ketones; their content in  ditterent
water samples varied from 1.8  to 2.0 mg/1;
•   hydrocarbons concentration from 0.8 to 3.5 mg/1;
•   quinones concentration from 0.3 to I.I mg/1;
•   the content of  other neutral compounds in treated
water was 6 - 95 mg/1.
   This group also contains alkohols, esters, lactones.
   Summing  up  the  results   of investigations of the
composition of the neutral group it should be noted that
the  above-mentioned  data  testify  to  the  fact that
intermediate  products of petroleum  hydrocarbons bio-
chemical  oxidation,  lhat  is  oxygen-containing  com-
pounds,  are  very  numerous  and  present  in water in
considerable quantities.
   Special attention should be paid to the high content
of high-toxic  and relatively  stable quinones in waste
water.
   Quinones  appear  as intermediate  products  of aro-
matic  hydrocarbons biochemical  oxidation (oil  from
oil-refining plants bears up to 20% of aromatic hydro-
carbons).
     Examination of  the  neutral  group composition
should be completed by characteristics of those 10-15%
of hydrocarbons resistabt to oxidation and remained in
waste water after biochemical  oxidation.
   Having used a new  gas chromatographic method of
hydrocarbons  determination  with  their  distribution
according to  boiling temperatures  the authors managed
to define which  of hydrocarbons remained in waste
water after biochemical treatment.
   The results of  investigations given  in  Fig.I and in
Table 3 illustrate hydrocarbons distribution according to
their temperatures of boiling and testify to the fact that
hydrocarbons boiling at temperatures lower than 250  -
300°C.  are  practically absent in biochemically  treated
waste water. These hydrocarbons usually have up to Cj4
-  Cj7 carbon atoms in the molecule. They  are mainly
oxidized, partly blown off in the  course of treatment.
The content of hydrocarbons  boiling at higher tempera-
tures decreases considerably  as well. They remain in
quantity of about 15-20% of their initial content.
   Two chromatograms  are given in  Figure  I. The first
one (A)  is given  for waste water  after sand filtration,
that  is before biochemical treatment. The chromato-
grams clearly  demonstrate that before treatment oil-con-
taining waste  waters are polluted by raw oil, what can be
seen from a fractional composition and uniform distribu-
tion of normal hydrocarbons peaks with a small incer-
tion of their isomers and aromatic hydrocarbons.
   As a result of treatment (see chromatogram "B") all
volatile and isomeric hydrocarbons were removed from
waste  water   -  benzine and  kerosene  fractions  are
practically absent in waste water.
   Fig. 2 demonstrates more clearly which hydrocarbons
remain in  waste  water after  biochemical treatment.
Remaining hydrocarbons with 25  carbon atoms in the
molecule give the highest peaks.
   Summing  up  featuring   of  the  neutral group of
compounds it should be men tioned once  more that this
group  is  one of the largest judging by a  number of
components  constituting it.  It consists of  toxic com-
pounds along with non-toxic ones (aldehydes, ketones,
anhydrides, esters and lactones).

Group of Acidic Compounds.

   The group is  divided  into  two  subgroups: strong
organic acids (acids with less than 10 carbon atoms in the
molecule) and weak organic  acids  with pK  value  > 10,
                                                      92

-------
                                                       J n fj-n [ •)
                                 SI
          -4-_.
                                            4 ....
     rr~
TableS.
Distribution of hydrocarbons in  oil-containing waste waters of
an  oil-refining  plant according to  boiling  temperatures.
          Number   Ranges of
            of
          fraction
          T
           boil.
in" C
Waste water
before treatment
(after sand filteration)
Waste water after
biochemical treatment
                                     Hydrocarbons
                                       content
                                                 Hydrocarbons
                                                    content
                                     weight %
                                          mg/1   Weight
                                            mg/1
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          1
          8
          9
          10
          11
          12
          13
          14
          100-130
          130-160
          160-190
          190-220
          220-250
          250-280
          280-310
          310-340
          340-370
          370-400
          400-430
          430-460
          460-490
          490 and more
            1.5
            3
            4
            13
            13
            19
            13
            11
            11
            6
            2.5
            1.5
            1
            0.5

            100
0.57
1.14
1.53
4.95
4.95
7.24
4.95
4.20
4.20
2.29
0.97
0.57
0.38
0.19
—
—
—
_
5
5
10
10
18
22
11
9
5
3
                                                    38.2
                                                 100
                                0.18
                                0.18
                                0.35
                                0.35
                                0.63
                                0.76
                                0.39
                                0.32
                                0.17
                                0.10

                                3.5
                                         93

-------
                                 sas^m xrf ~ q
                                 as -"JK a-f - T
The  group of acid compounds is the main one because
biochemical processes proceed with the  formation of
acids. Various methods of analysis were  used for its
examination.
   As a result of the examination carries out the total
content of all acids, and  non-volatile acids and volatile
acids contents defined separately, the total content of
innnocuous non-volatile acids and the content of some
other acids were found.
   Besides, the  content of naphthenic acids and other
highmolecular petroleum  acids were determined. Sum-
mary data for organic acids content  in waste waters are
given in Table 4.
   Formic,  acetic,  propyonic and butyric acids were
found in all  samples  of oil-containing  waste waters
treated in aeration tanks in the course of low-molecular
monocarboxylic acids determinations by a gas chromati-
graphic method. Valeric and caproic acids were  found
only  in one of the water samples. The  fact  that the
content of acetic acid exceeds that of other acids and
reaches 30-50%  of  all low-molecular monocarboxylic
acids has  appeared general for all water samples. These
data are in agreement with the information on the role
acetate  plays  in the metabolism  of acquatic organisms.
                                                            Special attention was paid to the non-volatile acids as
                                                         the contain both quite innocuous acids usually present
                                                         in water  sources,  and high-molecular acids including
                                                         naphthenic acids responsible for water toxicity.
                                                            Having analysed the  data given in Table 4 one can
                                                         come to the following conclusion: the group of acidic
                                                         compounds has appeared, as  expected, to be quite
                                                         numerous  (up  to  30%  of all organic compounds  are
                                                         included  in it) and  diverse  by its  composition.  It
                                                         contains acids differing in structure, molecular weight,
                                                         chemical and physical properties. Strong organic acids
                                                         content in it varies from 44 to 74 mg/1. From 20 to 50
                                                         mg/1  of this  content fall to the share of non-volatile
                                                         acids and only 24 mg/1 to naphthenic acids.

                                                         Table 4. Organic acids in oil-containing waste water after
                                                                          biochemical treatment.
                                                                                         Fluctuations during obser-
                                                                                         vation period 1971, 1972,
                                                                                         1973 mg/1
I. Strong organic acids 44 - 74
a) Volatile acids 14 - 35
formic acid
acetic acid
propionic acid
butyric acid
Other volatile acids
calculating on valeric
acid
b) Non-volatile acids 20-53
naphthenic acids
lactic acid
amber acid
fumaric acid
glutaric acid
adipinic acid
pyruvic acid
oxalic acid
malonic acid
and other not identified
malic acid
and other acids
not identified
Other high-molecular
acids
II. Very weak organic acids 6-8
a) phenols (volatile with vapour)
b) other very weak organic acids
(phenols with the place substituted in
p-position, estersof
phenolic acids
Sum total of all organic acids


3-8
8-15
3-5
4-7
_



2-4
1 -4


1 -3



1 -4


0.3-5


11-35

0.-3


5-6

50-82
   Summing  up  the  results  of analysis  of  organic
compounds in biochemically treated oil-containing waste
waters it should be mentioned once more that the
composition  of such  waters  is very  changeable  and
                                                      94

-------
depends  on  the  degree  of organic compounds bio-
chemical oxidation.
   The data obtained on  waste waters being examined
testify to the fact  that ether-extracted  compounds to
which special  attention  had  been  attracted before,
represent only a minute part of organic substances, in
order of 35  mg/1  or  10-15% of the total quantity of
organic substances.
Conclusions

   I. Analyses of chemical composition of oil-containing
waste waters carried  out in accordance with the new
schemes  for organic substances removal  from  waste
waters permit to preserve all volatile compounds, while
the methods considered before, such as direct extraction
by diethyl ether and sorption on activated carbon led for
different reasons to the loss of volatile substances.
   2. It is shown that biochemically treated waste water
contains  substantial quantity of various oxygen-contain-
ing organic  compounds  besides hydrocarbons remained.
Volatile, non-volatile acids, including  naphthenic ones
and  neutral   compounds,  such   as  hydrocarbons,
quinones, alkohols,  aldehydes, ketones, alkohols, and
esters were extracted and determined quantitatively. The
total content of such hydrophilic compounds as sugars,
aminoacids, oxyacids, sulfoacids,  polyalkohols  etc.  in
water was found along with the total content of organic
bases. IR-spectrum and chromatograms indicated quali-
titatively several other substances as well.
   3. It  was reaffirmed that about 10-15% of initially
present petroleum  hydrocarbons remain in  waste waters
treated in aeration tanks. Gas chromatographic analysis
has  indicated  that  they  belong   to  the  compounds
containing  more than 14 carbon atoms in the molecule
which is indicative of the  absence  of  hydrocarbons  of
benzine  and kerosene  fractions in  the  waste  water
treated.
   4. The investigations have shown that at biochemical
treatment  of  oil-containing waste waters petroleum
hydrocarbons  undergo  deep chemical  changes. A con-
siderable part  of  them in the form  of  intermediate
products of different degree of oxidation remains in the
waste water and causes  high COD value of  waste waters
treated (in order of 100-150 mg 0/1) and their toxicity.
It was found that the following compounds are responsi-
ble for toxicity of biochemically treated oil-containing
waste water:
•   quinones containing in waste water at concentration
up   to  I  mg/1,  which 10  times  exceeds  maximum
permissible concentrations,
•   neutral compounds at concentration of 25 mg/1 and
more that also  exceeds  their non-toxic  level. Toxicity of
this group is caused apparently, to a considerable extent,
by the presence of quinones in it,
•   minerals salts (water salinity > 5 g/1),
•   phenols, reduced to quinones as a result of biochem-
ical oxidation.
•   As the  toxicity of ciochemically treated waste water
decreases and even fully disappears with the time passes,
detention of treated  waste  waters in ponds before being
discharged is considered to be advisible.
                                                      95

-------
      COMPARISON  OF  ALTERNATIVE  STRATEGIES FOR COKE PLANT WASTEWATER DISPOSAL
                                by ROBERT W. DUNLAP Professor of Engineering and
                                Public Affairs Director, Environmental Studies Institute
                                FRANCIS CLA Y McMICHAEL Associate Professor of
                                Civil Engineering and Public Affairs
Trends in Cuke Making
   Fifty  years ago, the production  of  coke from  by-
product  ovens  first  surpassed  the  production  from
beehive  ovens.  For many  of these same years,  the
by-product  process  was  praised  for two significant
advances  over  beehive  coking;  first,  the  fact  that
by-product  processing introduced significant  chemical
recovery into coke making and second, that by-product
processing  significantly  reduced air pollution problems
associated with  coking.  The last 20-25  years, however,
have  brought  a changed  perspective. While oven-coke
production has remained stable at 54-64 million metric
tons per year over the last  quarter  century,  chemical
recovery has grown increasingly  less advantageous.  In
1950,  twenty-two percent of product values from  the
coke  plant were  associated  with  the value  of coal
chemicals*. By  1973,  coal chemicals represented only
twelve percent of total product value. At the same time
these  changes were  taking place, increasing attention has
been focused on the other principal difference between
by-product and beehive coking, namely the introduction
of  significant  water pollution problems  which  are  a
direct consequence of the gas processing.

Effluent Guidelines

   Coke  plant effluent limitations have been imposed by
the Environmental  Protection Agency2. It is recogniz-
ed that coke plant wastewaters are typically as saline as
sea water  and contain  a  broad  range   of  organics.
Limitations are  set for oil and grease, suspended solids,
pH and  sulfides,  but  the principal  attention  for  the
guidelines are  for the control of ammonia, cyanide and
phenolics. By  1977, the guidelines call for  more than 90
percent reduction of these pollutants from the levels in
typical untreated  process  waters. Further control by
1983  is  expected to reduce discharges of  the three by
more  than 99 percent (Table A).
                       TABLE A
              Effluent Limitations for Selected
              Coke Plant Pollutants (as kilograms)
               per million kilograms of coke)
                       Typical Raw    BPCTCA BATEA
 Pollutant              Wastewaters     (1977)   (1983)

 Ammonia                 914         91.2     4.2
 Cyanide                  120         21.9     0.1
 Phenol                   262           1.5     0.2
 Average Percent Removal     0.0%         91.2%   99.7%
   The intent of this study is to address the coke plant
wastewater problem by examining a number of topics.
What are  the  specific sources of the wastewaters? Can
they  be reduced in  quantity through process changes?
How  do  process objectives and environmental demands
like control of air pollution  influence waste character-
istics? How can we evaluate  the environmental impacts
to  air, water, and  land which result from  process
effluents or are associated with the energy demands of
process control?


Coke  Plant Wastewater Sources

   By-product coke  plants vary widely in size, extent
and type of by-product recovery, and wastewater prac-
tices.  Wastewaters in coking originate from three princi-
pal sources: coal moisture, water of decomposition, and
process waters  added  during  gas  treatment and  by-
product recovery.  The  process waters  are  the largest
fraction of the total wastewaters and typically  account
for 60 to 85 percent of the total flow, which may range
from  500  to 1700 liters per metric ton depending on the
level of process water recycle. Typical gas processing and
recovery steps are  shown  in  Figure A, which indicates
the six categories of wastes normally identified; (1) tar
still  wastewater, (2) excess  or waste ammonia liquor
(WAL) from  the primary cooler, (3) ammonia absorber
and crystallizer blowdown, (4) final cooler  wastewater
blowdown, (5) light oil (Benzol) plant  wastewater, (6)
gas desulfurizer and  cyanide  stripper wastewater. Table
B  indicates the level  of wastewater flow  and mass
emissions  of cyanide, ammonia, and phenol for each of
the wastewater  streams.   Loose or tight  recycle  is  a
measure of the flow reduction achieved  through recycle
and  process modification in  the final  cooler and  the
benzol plant. Mass emissions are essentially the same for
both  configurations with the  exception  of some loss of
pollutants assumed  for tight  recycle due to by-product
contamination, volatilization to the atmosphere in open
cooling towers, and development of corrosion products
in the coke oven gas distribution system.
   The  environmental  impact  of  these  wastewater
streams can be  summed up  by considering the overall
mass  balance of emissions to the air, water, and the land.
The coke  plant  necessarily consists of coke ovens, the
quench towers  for the  incandescent  coke,  the  by-
product plant, and an associated wastewater plant to
treat  the wastes to meet  the  guidelines.  Figure B shows
the principal plant input, coal, and the main outputs of
                                                      96

-------
        Evaporated
Water Water (150 gal/ton)
COKE
QUENCH
i

Coke
^coke COKE gas
OVENS
1

Coal
(4200 tons/day) (6000 tons/day)

\ _ FINAL
/* COOLER
"3

ste
gas

DOO gpm

WASH OIL COOLING
AND


RECYCLE

t
300 gpn (loose)
30 gp
m (tight)
__. PRIMARY COOLER
t TAR DECANTER
.
< — stea

TAR
STILL
am CL)S 9pm
LIGHT OIL


'

WASH OIL
DECANTER

..




G
gas


J

gas





) 100 gpm




BENZOL
PLAN


GAS BLANKETING
AND HEAT EXCHANGE
T




AMMONIA ABSORBER ^/T^
AND CRYSTALLIZER X_/
11


COOLING TOWER
WITH RECYCLE
00 gpm



^3 )lOO gpin
DESULFURIZER
AND CYANIDE
STRIPPER
1

REBOILER

©360 gpm {loos
65 gpm (tigh

Clean
	 "— Gas
10
40 gpm

e
t)

Figure A. Srli"Utlc of Coke Plant Wastes.
Table B. Characteristics of Coke

Basis:
Plant Wastewater Streams
5443 kkg/day coal charged at
10% moisture

with 70% coke yield, equivalent to
3810 kkg/day coke product.
Mass Flow


Flow
Cyanide Ammonia Phenol
Flow tiwh Loose Recycle (gpm) (1pm)
1. Tar Still
2. WAL
3. NH3 Crystallizer
4. Final Cooler
5. Benzol
6. Desulfurizer

Total
5
20
100 380
100 380
300 1140
360 1360
40 150
905 3430
(kg/day) (kg/day)
2
33
8
164
4
246
457
136
3270
6
65
6
0
3483
(kg/day)
132
794
2
63
10
0
1001
Mass Flow


Flow with Tight Recycle
1. Tar Still
2. WAL
3. NG3Crystallizer
4. Final Cooler
5. Benzol
6. Desulfurizer
Flow
Cyanide Ammonia
(gpm) (1pm)
5
20
100 380
100 380
30 1
10
65 250
40 1150
(kg/day) (kg/day)
2
33
8
82
2
246
136
3270
6
33
2
0
Phenol
(kg/day)
132
794
2
40
3
0
                Total
                                  340
1290    373
                                                                3447
                                   971
                                          97

-------
                                COKE OVENS
                                                           QUENCH TOWER
                                UASTEWATER
                                TREATMENT
                                  PLANT
                                                          BY-PRODUCT PLANT
                                         STEAK
                                         ELECTRICITY
                                                                                   COAL CHEMICALS
                                                                                   COKE OVEN GAS
             AIR EMISSIONS
               • QUENCH HATER
               • COOLING TOWER VOLATILES
                                                                      HATER EMISSIONS
                                                                         • PROCESS WASTEWATERS
                                                                       LAND EMISSIONS
                                                                         • TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE
                                                    FIGURE I
coke, coal chemicals, and  coke oven gas.  The  mass
balance  must also include air emissions from the  open
cooling  tower and the quench tower in the form of
volatiles and particulate matter. Water emissions may be
adequately  represented  by  ammonia,  cyanide,  and
phenol.  To control  the  wastewater effluents  to the
degree required  by current  regulations, a new element
must be  added—energy in  the  form of  steam  and
electricity is needed to operate the treatment systems.

Energy for Wastewater Control-Alternate Strategies

   The energy system is examined more closely in Figure
C.  It  consists   of a  power  plant, assumed to  be a
coal-fired  boiler, to raise steam  and to generate elec-
tricity for the wastewater treatment plant. The power
plant  also  produces environmental  emissions  even
though the plant is configured to meet applicable air and
water  regulations. Particulate matter, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, and waste  heat  are emitted to  the air.
Waste heat goes to  the water, while land emissions are
ash  and SC>2 scrubber sludge from  the power plant, as
well as demineralization  or softening sludge from  the
boiler  water treatment plant. An  interesting problem
now arises. It appears that as one problem is solved-the
wastewater effluent problem from the coke  plant-
another emission problem is created, namely the disposal
of effluents produced from generation of the required
steam and  electricity. Furthermore, it  seems obvious
that more and more energy will be required as the level
of wastewater  treatment becomes  more stringent. To
decrease  the effluents from  the coke plant, one must
the  boiler plant.  Several questions are  posed.  Are we
working  at cross purposes?  What  is the  net environ-
mental impact?  How do we obtain an optimum level of
wastewater treatment which achieves  the maximum
environmental improvement,  considering all effects? To
answer  these  questions  it is necessary to  perform a
careful  environmental  assessment  of the coking  opera-
tion, including an examination of alternate strategies for
handling the wastewaters. Table C lists eight alternate
strategies (Cases 0 through 7) for controlling wastewater
discharges.  Each strategy involves one of three levels of
wastewater  treatment  (Raw  wastewater, Level I, Level
II), one of two levels of recycle  (Loose, Tight), and one
of two quenching practices (Clean, Wastewater).
   Flow processes for  the wastewater treatment  strate-
gies are shown in Figures D & E for a hypothetical coke
plant configured for this study. The wastewater flows
are generated  from recovery operations found in many
steel plants. With a daily coal charge  of 6000  tons (5443
kkg) and a daily furnace coke production of 4200 tons
(3810 kkg), such a plant would  be among the largest 25
plants  in  the  country. Level I treatment is wholly a
physical-chemical  system employing a  method of cya-
nide stripping based on existing technology  developed
by Bethlehem Steel Corporation3,   ammonia removal
using a conventional still, and phenol extraction based
on existing technology developed by Jones and Laughlin
Steel Corporation4.  Level  II  is  a higher  level  of
treatment,  combining physical-chemical operations with
biological waste  treatment. The biological plant is  similar
to an existing facility at Bethlehem Steel and is designed
to  reduce  the   carbonaceous  oxygen demand, with
performance primarily set for phenolics reduction. These
treatment  systems  do  not  precisely  correspond to
treatment levels designed to  meet current EPA BPCTCA
or BATEA limits.  However, Level  I  meets BPCTCA
guidelines for cyanide and ammonia; Level II meets all
BPCTCA  guidelines  and the  BATEA  guideline  for
phenol.
   The eight  different control  strategies each result in
 pollutant  emissions to  the air,  water, and land.  Air
 emissions originate  from the coke quench tower, from
                                                       98

-------
                                       ELECTRICITY
                   COAL
                   (FUEL)
                                       STEAK
                                                                 COKE PLANT WASTEWATER
                                                                   TREATMENT PLANT
                                                 ENERGY PLANT
                                  BOILER WATER TREATMENT PLANT
                                  UTILITY AND POWER PLANT
                                  STEAM GENERATION
                                  ELECTRICITY GENERATION
                                            LAND EMISSIONS
                                            • ASH
                                            • SLUDGE
                                            HATER EMISSIONS
                                             WASTE HEAT
                                            AIR EMISSIONS
                                             PM
                                             I'ASTE HEAT
Table C. Coke Plant Wastewater Control Strategies
 Case     Treatment
Level of Recycle    Type Quency
 Loose   Tight   Clean Wastewater
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Raw Wastewater
Raw Wastewater
Raw Wastewater
Raw Wastewater
Level I
Level I
Level II
Level II
X
X






                                 X
                                 X
                                 X
                                 X
                                 X
                                 X
                   X

                   X

                   X

                   X
X

X

X

X
the  open  cooling  towers,  and from the  power plant
supplying  electricity  and/or steam to  the  treatment
process units.  Water  emissions arise from coke plant
wastewaters,  from  blast  furnace  wastewaters  which
account   for   pollutants  transferred  by  wastewater
quenching, and from power plant waste heat discharges.
Land emissions originate at the power plant, the quench
tower, the boiler water treatment plant,  the coke plant
ammonia  still, and the coke plant biological treatment
plant.
   The foundation  of the analysis is the construction of
an inventory of all  principal pollutants emitted to air,
water, and  land  for  each  of  the selected  control
strategies.  Figure  F  shows  the  daily  emissions for a
selected  list  of  pollutants  from  each  of the  active
operations  for  each  control strategy.  Measures were
generated  for  eight pollutants emitted to  the  air, six
pollutants to the water, and five pollutants  to the land.
By itself, this accounting of the  residuals shows  the
relative complexity of the problem. It remains for the
community and the regulatory agency  to  develop an
aggregate summation of these different residuals in order
to select an overall best strategy for the environment as a
whole.

Cross-Media Analysis

   Comparing  the complete inventory of emissions with
the original wastewater loads  (Figure F, Case 0) shows
that the reduction of emissions of ammonia, cyanide,
and  phenol to the water involves  the generation and
discharge  of   many other  pollutants and treatment
residuals  to the  air and land.  A  comparison  of  the
relative environmental impact of the different strategies
demands  the  ability to compare trade-off effects, i.e.,
the effect on  the  environment of reducing mass  emis-
sions  of pollutants to  the water while increasing mass
discharges  of  other pollutants  to  the  air and  land.
Reiquam,  Dee,  and  Choi  at  the  Battelle Memorial
Institute under a contract sponsored by the Council on
Environmental Quality and the EPA developed  a tech-
nique for  this  purpose, termed Cross-Meida Analysis5.
This analysis starts with a mass emission inventory. A
hierarchical arrangement of weights is developed consist-
ing of two levels, media weights and pollutant weights.
                                                       99

-------
The first level of weights for air, water, and land may be
regional or applicable to the country as a  whole. The
second level of pollutant weights establishes a mechan-
ism for allocating relative fractions of each of the media
weight totals to each pollutant. Choices between alter-
nate  strategies are based  on  the relative  values of a
numerical index calculated from the Cross-Media Analy-
sis.
   The environmental degradation index (EDI) is  ihs
arithmetic  sum  of the  weighted  damages  for  each
pollutant in each media,

              EDI -  z"  d>-5 w> MP
where p is the pollutant index and
   dp?s is the damage function for a selected strategy, s,
with
      (0s
-------
air  and water both  ranked above the land.  The CMU
system distributes the pollutant weights less evenly than
BMI and focuses on phenol in water as being the most
critical pollutant to control.
   The  mass emission inventory shown  graphically in
Figure F must be converted to a set of numbers between
0 and 1, to be expressed as the damage function, dn, for
the  cross-meida  analysis.  This  study  examined  the
sensitivity of the environmental degradation index to the
procedure used  for  calculating  damage.  The simplest
damage function imaginable scale damage as a linear
function of  the  mass of pollutant discharged. One  may
choose  damage  functions  to scale  relative  emissions
non-linearly, so  as to place heavy damage on any small
emission or to delay  assignment of damage until  a large
fraction  of  the  largest possible emission  is reached
(Figure  G). The  results  of the sensitivity  of the relative
rank  of the coke   plant strategies  for  nine  damage
functions are shown in Table E. Using either the CMU or
the BMI weighting  functions  and the various damage
functions, the relative ranks of the  coke plant waste-
                               AIR EMISSIONS         c,
                                                [HEAT*
                   10'
                    10
                           /1 \    /, 1I   '  ix—r-3"
                           /\\  !ti\±£r:
                                water  strategies  are  nearly  the same.  By  comparing
                                absolute values  of the  SEI calculations as well as the
                                sensitivity of the ranks for each strategy, it is possible to
                                assemble  a  qualitative  grouping  of the  coke  plant
                                strategies shown in Table F.

                                Comparison of Wastewater Control Strategies

                                   Table G shows that control of coke plant wastewaters
                                does  result  in  environmental  improvement  for  the
                                watercourse to which the plant discharges its wastes.
                                Control strategy Case 0 (loose  recycle,  no wastewater
                                treatment,  discharge to the  river) is chosen as the base
                                case against which all other strategies are compared. The
                                least  desirable  control  strategies  have  negative SEI
                                values, indicating a net environmental damage compared
                                to the base case. In contrast, a large positive total SEI
                                value for a control strategy indicates net environmental
                                improvement compared to the base case. For all control
                                strategies, and either  weighting method,  positive SEI
                                values  occur for  the  water  media, indicating environ-
                                mental improvement over the base case.
                                   Note, however, that environmental improvement for
                                the  watercourse  is  coupled in  every  situation with
                                degradation of the air and land media. Values of zero for
                                the SEI mean that these cases are identical to the base
                                case. Furthermore, in some cases the net environmental
                                degradation  of the air and land media are large enough
                                to negate the improvement which has taken place in the
                                watercourse. Environmental improvement in one media -
                               ' here, water  - is inextricably associated with deleterious
   I    I   I   I    I   I   I
01234567
         CASE

      WATER EMISSIONS
                                                              LAND EMISSIONS
                 EC  y
                 ^ in£
                 o
                 a
                    0.1
                   FIGURE F.  EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR 3S10 KKG/DAY (1200 TON/DAY) COKE PLANT FOR LIGHT
                           SELECTED STRATEGIES.
                                                            •HEAT IN 106 BTU PER DAY
                                                    101

-------
Table D.  Pollutant Weights (Wp) and Modifier Function (Mp)
for Coke Plant Wastewater Study
CMU Weights

Pollutant
To Water:
NH3
1OH
CN
SCN
Cl
Heat
Sum
To Land:
Ash, Coke Breeze
SO2-Lime Sludge
NH3-Lime Sludge
Boiler Water Sludge
Biological Sludge
Sum
To Air:
NOX
SO 2
PM
NHs
tOH
CN
Cl
Heat
Sum
Total
wp


5
321
22
3
1
22
374

41
54
54
54
54
255

30
70
60
26
48
82
25
30
371
1000
Mp


0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5


0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6


0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5


WpMp


3
160
11
2
1
11


20
32
32
32
32


15
49
48
13
19
33
10
15


BMI Weights
wp


52
84
74
56
33
74
373

42
58
58
58
58
274

22
43
56
47
56
60
47
22
353
1000
Mp


0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5


0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6


0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5


WpMp


31
42
37
28
20
37


21
35
35
35
35


11
30
45
24
22
24
19
11


Table E.  Frequency Distribution of Alternative Strategies by Rank
            " for Nine Damage Function Choice^

 Number of Times Case Ranked As Shown (CMU Weights)
"~\Ronk
Case ^-\
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
X
I
X
6
2
X
X
X
2
1
1
X
1
4
2
X
X
3
X
X
X
X
2
7
X
X
4
2
4
1
2
X
X
X
X
5
2
1
5
X
1
X
X
X
6
3
1
3
X
X
X
2
X
7
1
1
X
X
X
X
7
X
8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
Average
Rark
5.00
4.11
5.22
1.78
2.33
2.78
6.78
8.00
   Number of Times Case Ranked As Shown (EMI Weights)
~^^Rank
Case — ~^
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
X
3
X
6
X
X
X
X
2
2
2
X
2
X
3
X
X
3
1
1
2
X
1
4
X
X
4
X
X
2
1
4
2
X
X
5
1
3
5
X
X
X
X
X
6
5
X
X
X
4
X
X
X
7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
8
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
X
Average
Rank
4 67
2.73
4.33
1.56
4.78
2 89
8 00
7.00
                         102

-------
Case
                        TABLE F
        Grouping of Wastewater Treatment Strategies
                    Treatment
         Raw wastewater effluent; loose recycle;
         wastewater quench

         Level I treatment; tight recycle; waste-
         water discharge to watercourse
         Level II treatment; tight recycle;
         wastewater discharge to watercourse
         Level II treatment; tight recycle;
         wastewater quench
Qualitative
 Ranking
  3       Raw wastewater effluent; tight recycle;     Preferred
         wastewater quench               ~
  5       Level I treatment; tight recycle; waste-     Preferred
         water quench
Better
than Base
Case
  2      Raw wastewater effluent; tight recycle;
         wastewater discharge to watercourse       Base Case
  0      Raw wastewater effluent; loose recycle;
         wastewater discharge to watercourse
                                               Not Pre-
                                               ferred
                    TABLE G
     Net Environmental Impact for Two Selected
     Sets of Pollutant Weights and a S-shaped
                Damage Function

                  (a = B = 1.5)

STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS INDEX (CMU Weights).
Case
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Case
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Air
0
-39
- 5
-75
-16
-30
-28
-39
STRATEGY
Air
0
-47
- 3
-89
-12
-34
-20
-40
Water
0
85
3
172
162
170
164
166
Land
0
0
0
0
- 70
- 70
-148
-148
EFFECTIVENESS INDEX
Water
0
77
5
154
92
136
82
120
Land
0
0
0
0
- 76
- 76
-161
-161
Total
0
46
- 2
97
76
70
-12
-21
Rank
5
4
6
1
2
3
7
8
(BMI Weights)
Total
0
30
2
65
4
26
-99
-81
Rank
5
2
6
1
4
3
8
7
                   Figure G  The Dajnage Function
  Domage
  Function
    dP,s
                     Relative Moss Emission
         The damage function is assumed to be the cumulative Beta Function
         based on two parameters, a and p

         Mean of distribution is [a/(u-* p)j and the variance of the distribu-
         tion is  [ap/Ca + p)2 (a + p + 1}] .

         For nil cas>es , the damage function is 1 when the relative emission is
         1, that is the actual emission is maximum  When the actual emission
         is zero, the damage function is zero

         The following ranges of a and p were studied.
^\ p
a ^\
1.0
1 0
3 0
1 0
X
X
X
1 0
X
X
X
3 0
.\
X
X
             cross-media  effects, which may be large enough them-
             selves to provide no net environmental improvement for
             the control effort.


             Conclusions

                The prinicpal findings of this study apply to the coke
             plant problem in particular, but suggest there may be
             grave consequences whenever there is stringent effluent
             regulation  for  separate  media.  Wastewater treatment
             provides  environmental  improvement for  one  media,
             water, but  will  lead  to  the degradation  of the other
             media,  air  and  land.  This  is the phenomenon  of
             cross-media impact; energy  requirements for treatment
             processes  create  new  pollutant residuals which  are
             smeared across  all media. For  some wastewater treat-
             ment practices,  the net environmental improvement  due
             to the practice is negative, i.e., cross-media effects are so
             large as to negate the beneficial effects of improving the
             water media.  The frequency for which  net degradation
             of the environment is forecast from this analysis depends
             on  input  parameter values and assumptions;  this  fre-
             quency  rises sharply with the stringency of wastewater
             treatment.
                It is useful to characterize the coke plant problem in
             three ways - by type of quench water, by level of process
             water recycle, and  by level of treatment selected  for
             wastewaters.  The  cross-media  analysis leads  to  the
             following observations:
                                                        103

-------
•   Quenching with coke plant  effluents,  regardless  of
their  level  of  treatment,  appears to  be  a  preferred
practice  for  the  greatest  net  improvement  of the
environment. This practice is preferred over discharge  of
that  effluent  (at  the  same  level of  treatment)  to
watercourse.
•   Tight recycle of cooling waters rather than  loose
recycle  appears  to  be  preferred  for the  greatest net
environmental improvement.
•   For  the wastewater control  case  in  which  tight
recycle  of  cooling  waters is  employed and  the final
effluent  is  used for wastewater quenching, no waste-
water treatment is a preferred practice over either  Level
I or Level II treatment, if the greatest net environmental
improvement is to achieved.
•   For  the wastewater control  case  in  which  tight
recycle  of  cooling  waters is  employed and  the final
effluent  is  discharged to a watercourse, Level I is the
preferred wastewater treatment,  if  the  greatest net
environmental improvement is  to  be  realized.  For this
case,  this treatment level is  preferred over the alterna-
tives of no treatment of Level II treatment.
•   These results suggest that the  current EPA effluent
standards for by-product  coke  plants,  particularly the
BATEA (1983)  limits, are too stringent to maximize the
net environmental improvement which  can result from
the treatment and disposal of coke plant  wastewaters.
   The results of this study clearly support the conten-
tion  that   levels of  environmental  control  must  be
considered very  carefully if maximum improvement  of
the environment is to take place; stringent control  of
emissions is not necessary  the  best  course of action.
However, this analysis, like  all analyses, is an  approxi-
mation of reality, and not reality itself. In particular, the
cross-media technique requires many assumptions which
are open to question and  interpretation.  Nevertheless,
the results of the study appear robust enough that strong
conclusions can  be  stated regarding current by-product
coke  plant  effluent limitations.  This  analysis is offered
not to  exacerbate  the current  controversy  regarding
treatment and disposal of coke plant wastewaters but to
move the controversy toward more rational emphasis  on
net  improvement  of  the  environment,   rather  than
emphasis on single media regulations and solutions.
                      References

1.  U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United
   States- 1973 (94th Edition), Washington, D.C., 1973.
2.  Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category, Effluent
   Guidelines and Standards, Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 126,
   June 28, 1974.

3.  Kurtz, J.K., "Recovery and Utilization of Sulfur from Coke
   Oven Gas," in Problems and Control of Air Pollution, ed. by
   F.S. Mallette, Remhold Publishing Corp., 1955.

4.  Lauer, F., E.J.  Littlewood, and  J.J. Butler, "New  Solvent
   Extraction Process for Recovery  of Phenols from Coke Plant
   Aqueous  Waste,"  Jones  and Laughlin  Steel Corporation.
   Presented at  Eastern  States Blast Furnace and  Coke Oven
   Association Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pa., February 14, 1969.

5.  Reiquam,  H.,  N. Dee,  and P. Choi, "Development  of
   Cross-Media Evaluation Methodology," Final Report to Coun-
   cil on Environmental Quality and U.S. Environmental Protec-
   tion  Agency,  Contract   No.  EQC315,  Battelle Memorial
   Institute, Columbus,  Ohio, Volumes I and  II, January 14,
   1974 (PB232414/3WP);  also "Assessing Cross-Media  Im-
   pacts," Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No.
   2, February 1975.

6.  Dunlap, R.W. and F.C. McMichael, "Environmental Impact of
   Coke Plant Wastewater Treatment and Disposal," Journal of
   Ironmaking and Steelmaking, in press.

7.  Dunlap, R.W. and F.C. McMichael, "Air, Land, or Water: The
   Dilemma of Coke Plant Wastewater Disposal," Environmental
   Science and Technology, in press
                                                       104

-------
                   STUDIES  ON  OXIDATION PROCESSES OF  CIANIDES AND
          PHENOLS IN WASTE AND NATURAL WATERS BY USING CHLORINE DIOXIDE.

                                    by A.N. Belevtzev, Ju.L. Maximenko.
   Hypochlorite,  chlorine  and  chloride  of lime are
usually used as bactericidal and oxidizing agents in water
and  waste treatment processes. However  their usage
doesn't often produce significant effect.
   Therefore  the intensive searches of new oxidizing and
bactericidal agents for water treatment are lately carry-
ing out.  At the institute VODGEO it  was studied the
possibility  of chlorine  dioxide  utilization  for  above
mentioned purposes in addition to testing for oxidation
processes of various substances contained in natural and
waste waters  by using hypoclorites, ozone oxygen in the
air and other oxidizing agents. This oxidazmg agent was
selected due  to a number of its advantages  over other
oxidizing  agents such  as  relative  stability in  water
solutions, high oxidation potential.
   In the  performed tests the main attention was given
to  studyin  the  oxidation  processes  of simple  and
complex  cyanides,  rhodonides,  sulfides and  phenols
because these compounds often occur in waste effluents
of various industries and  also in stream waters.
   The considered compounds are  strong toxic, posess
offencive  organoleptic properties and are converted to
nontoxic ones during oxidation distruction.
   The present paper deals with the results of investiga-
tions in the field of oxidation of cyanide and phenolic
compounds.

Chemical effects of chlorine dioxide.

   In the case chlorine dioxide interaction with reducers
it gains 1  or 5  electrons and is reduced to chlorite or
chloride ions that may  be described by the following
reactions (1 - 6):
   On the basis of known normal redox potentials of the
systems as 1 (Eg = 1.27 v) and 2(EQ = 1.5) and be using
Luter's rule.
(to - p)- Eonj/p = (m-n) • E om/n •'(ft-p) - E on/p
where m, n, p denote the degtee of valency and m > n >
P

as well as by using Nernet's equation.
where n is the quantity of  transfered electrons the
normal redox potentials  of systems as (3), (4), (5), (6)
were  estimated  that  proved  to  be  equal respectively
0.84V; 1.56v; 1.15v;0.77v.
   The  conducted  calculations allowed chlorine dioxide
reduction  to  be  presented  in  flow  diagram in the
following oxidation reactions as:
in acid media
         :0-'i,27,
                  - 1   1
                     »   1
£0-t,ttt
GO,
in alkaline media
   The schemes show that in acid media chlorine dioxide
should  be mainly  reduced to chlorides as the redox
potential  of system CL02/CL = l.5v more  of that for
systems CL02/HCL02 =  1.21 v.
   In alkaline  media chlorine dioxide is  reduced to
chlorite  ions  at  a faster  rate  as the normal redox
potential  of system CLO CLO2 = 1.15v is more of that
for system CLO2/CL = 0.85v.
   Insofar as the  potential  of  redox  reaction  is a
function  of  several other  factors in the direction of
reactions  it  may be deviations depending on particular
conditions.
   However  the general regularity should be maintained.
By using  the normal  redox potential  we estimated the
reaction potentials of chlorine dioxide interaction with
oxidable  substances under  various conditions, thereby
we selected  the conditions  of  their carrying  out, sched-
uled  the  proposed directions of  reactions  and their
products.

Oxidation of cyanides

   All the water soluble cyanides except for the complex
                                                      CS'
                                                   105

-------
cyanides of iron are very toxic compounds. As a rule
cyanides affected by  oxidizing agents are oxidized  to
cyanates as follows:
which  are  then  hydrolyzed  forming  carbonate  and
ammonium ions that is described by the equation (8).
   The  estimations  based  on  determination  of  the
reaction  potential  difference  show  that during  the
oxidation process of cyanides chlorine dioxide should be
mainly reduced to chlorite ions as in alkaline  media the
potential  difference  of  systems   C1O2/C1O2"  and
CNO'/CN" is  more of that for systems C1O2/C1" and
CNO-/CN-.
   The estimations were experimentally confirmed dur-
ing cyanide  oxidation  of alkaline metals  as  well  as
cyanides bound to complexes with zinc and cadmium.
   The results of researches showed that simple cyanides
and cyanides  bound  to complexes with zinc and cad-
mium were oxidized to cyanates at  the  rate of chlorine
dioxide described by the following equations  as: (9),
(10), (Fig. 1).
                                                 10

where Me = Zn^+ or Cd^+ (5, 2 mg per 1 mg of cyanide
ions).
   In strong alkaline media (pH > 10) the reactions
proceed at faster rate. Oxidation of cyanides bound to
complexes with copper  followed  otherwise. In  spite of
the fact that copper-cyanide complexes are more stable
versus ones  contained  zinc  and  cadmium  they are
oxidized more readily at chlorine dioxide rate decreased
almost by five times.
   The process is effected in two consecutive stages, at
first cyanides are  oxidized to cyanates while  chlorine
dioxide  is reduced to  chlorite ions that's  given  by
equation (1 1).
                                                  n
then the formed chlorite  catalytically  oxidizes the rest
cyanides thereby being  reduced to chloride ions, as
follows:
                                                  12
   In summation the process may be reproduced by the
following equation:
                                        2          13
   So on the basis of conducted investigations we may
state that cyanides bound to complexes with copper are
catalitically oxidized, as a result chlorine dioxide gains
five electrons and is reduced to chlorides.
   The rate of process significantly depends on quantity
of copper in the complex.
   The  catalysis  was  found to  take place  if ratio
/Cu/;/CN-/  corresponded  to complexes  respectively
Cu(CN)^ and Cu(CN)2
   The catalysis was not observed in the presence of the
complex Cu(CN)3" and of free cyanide ions in solution.
(Fig. 2).
   The  estimations  of  constants  concerning  complex
instability and the experimental  data allow the  assump-
                                                            /ro
                                                                 Ion ratio (cjf"):(-l.*l)=  '•:<- 1 o-zre.
                                                                    ]       !       '   2,51- 2 surve.
                                                                    i       !       i   2,j;3,1 - 3 :urve
                                                                    1       '       '   a. = - •*• c-_rve.
     Pig.1. Efiect of Chlorine Dioxide Rote on Oxidation
           Proceaa of Cianidee.
                                                    106.

-------
tion to be made that the catalizators of process are itself
copper-cyanide complexes Cu(CN)2and Cu(CN)?".
   At introducing copper ions into solutions of complex
cyanides of zince and cadmium the  catalytic effect  of
copper-cyanide  complexes on  oxidation process  was
found out.
   The oxidation process of cyanides bound  to  com-
plexes  with nickel  and  cobalt  proceeds with  great
difficulties by the equation (14) and (15) when chloride
dioxide rate is of much above the theoretical one (8-10
mg/mg)
                                                 14
                                             2    15

   It was due to  large losses of CLC>2 as a result of its
destruction caused by the low rate of oxidation process.
   Chlorine dioxide cyanides bound to complexes with
iron are not  oxidized. Chlorine  dioxide effect  on
ferrocyanides results in their oxidation only to ferro-
cyanides, i.e. oxidation of only metall in complex.
   The  formed cyanates produced  from  oxidation of
cyanides are  oxidized by chlorine dioxide with much
more difficulty. The reaction occurs at marked rate only
at pH < 6. The products of oxidation there to proved to
be elementary nitrogen and bicarbonate ions.
   So  chlorine dioxide  is  reduced to  chloride  and
chloride ions as:
                                                 16
                                                 17

   At  the  same  time  hydrolysis  of cyanates with
 subsequent formation of ammonium ions takes place at
 pH < 5. The rates of both processes are proportional at
 pH values in the range of 3.5 - 4.2.
   Chlorine dioxide rate required for oxidation 1 mg of
 cyanate ion is  a function of pH value. It is on average
 equal to 3.4 mg at pH values of 3.5-5.0, theoretical rate
 by the reactions (1 6) and (17) amounts respectively 0.96
 mg/mg and 4.82 mg/mg.

 Oxidation of phenoiic compounds.

   In complex problem of potable  and  waste water
 treatment the  removing of phenols refers to category of
 technologic  processes  that require  to be thoroughly
 investigated. Some  of researches have studied phenol
 interaction with chlorine dioxide. However the obtained
 results are contradictory in  many respects especially as
 concerns kinetics, mechanism and products of oxidation
 reactions.
   The investigators of our country disclosed that in acid
 and neutral media  phenol  (carbolic acid)  is  readily
 oxidized by chlorine dioxide at the rate of 1.2 mg/mg
 (Figs. 3,4);  the  main  products of  oxidation  is  n6-
 benzoquinone.
                                                         a
                                                         o
 o
 a
 o
 o
H
 8
 u
si
 1st
                            dose,mg,per 1mg
                            of phenol.

         Pig.J.  Phenol  concentration vari-
                 ations  ve.CLOp dose.
               60      120      YJ<7     Z1D
                  Time in minutes.


       Fig.4. Kinetics of phenol  oxidation
               by using various CLOg doses.
                                                    107

-------
   The  oxidation  rate  and  the  required excess  of
chlorine  dioxide are functions both  of initial phenol
concentration and of temperature.
   Phenol concentrations vary from 50  to 0.02 mg/1
while the rate  of CL02 increases in the 1.2-2.7 mg/mg
range.
   Lowering  the  temperature  results in  decrease  in
reaction  rate.  An  increase in  reaction  rate  at low
temperatures is achieved either  by adding large  quan-
                                                    tities of CL02 (for complete oxidation of phenol at the
                                                    temperature of 5°C the oxidizing agent is required to be
                                                    2-2.5  times of  that at the temperature of 20°C) or by
                                                    increase in time constant up to 4-6 hours (Figs. 5-6).
                                                       Mechanism of one especially depend on pH value  and
                                                    if in acid and neutral media the oxidation process occurs
                                                    only to benzoquinone whereas in alkaline solution the
                                                    reaction proceeds more  deeply. Quinone formed at the
                                                    first stage is then oxidized to carbonic acid (Figs. 7, 8).
       Pig.5
        2       3       *       S
  CL02 rste Eg per 1  mg of phenol.

Effect of temperature onCLOp rate
required for complete phenol oxidation.
                                                              20
                                                                            to     &D     JD
                                                                            time in minutea.
                                                          .6  Effect  pH  value  and  temperature on phenol
                                                                   oxidation  rate.
     2,5  3
                              6      r
                             pH value
Pig.7   Effect pH value nn phenol  and n-benzoqulnone
       trations at varioue CIOp doees.
       1- 0,7 rag/rae.; 2-1,0 rag/me.t 3-1,2 mg/mg.(


       5-5 mg/ -) rag phenol.
                                                                      SO
                                                                                  Phenol tnc r>- oe::icc--r:i
                                                                                  tratlot vanaticlif. vr.
                                                                                           at •or.  - 1-.C.
                                                      108

-------
   By using physical-chemical methods of analysis for
acid fraction (on absorption  spectre both in the ultra-
violet and polaro-graphically) malcic acid was identified
as a main product  of oxidation.  Oxalic  acid  is also
identified and a group of volatile acids is isolated (acetic
and formic acids are assumed to be among the acids).
   During phenol oxidation chlorine dioxide is  mainly
reduced to chloride ions. The process may be presented
by the following summarized equations:
   in acid and neutral media
                                                  18
   in alkaline media
                         CH-COOH
                         CH-COOH                ,9
   In alkaline media chlorine  dioxide is partly reduced
to chlorite ions as:
                         CH-COOH
                         CH-COOH
                                                  20
   Therefore chlorine  dioxide rate required for oxida-
tion of one weight part  of phenol in alkaline media
constitutes five weight parts that is some more of that
by  equation (19) (2.4 mg/mg) and it is greatly less of
that by equation (2.0), therewith CLC>2 being reduced
to chlorite (12mg/mg).
   Cresols  and  multiatomic  phenols  (hydroquinone,
resorcinol, pyrogallol, pyrocatechol) occur in addition to
simple phenol (carbolic  acid)  in  waste  effluents  of
several industries and hence in  water of  streams into
which the mentioned effluents are discharged.
   During chlorizating process cresols similarly carbolic
acid may  form chloroderivatives the presence  of which
in water  is dangerous in organoleptic respect  as in the
case of phenol content.
   Multiatomic phenols are toxically harmful. Not  so
much important cited in the literature on oxidation both
of cresols and multiatomic phenols either by chlorine
dioxide or other  oxidizing agents justify that  they are
more readily  oxidized than  carbolic acid  especially in
alkaline media. As a result  of their oxidation the proper
compounds  of quinone structure assumed thereto to  be
formed. The data as concerns subsequent conversions of
such compounds  being influenced by various oxidizing
agents are not complete.
   We attempted  to disclose  the mechanisms of oxida-
tion of cresols, quinones and multi- atomic phenols  by
chlorine  dioxide  as well  as to identify the  products
produced during reactions.
   The oxidation processes  are considered on the follow-
ing examples:
   — cresol oxidation on that  of metacresols,
   - quinone oxidation on that of n-benzoquinone,
   -  multiatomic   phenols   oxidation   on  that
resorcinol.
                                                  of
   The studies on metacresol oxidation showed that it is
readily oxidized by chlorine dioxide. Both its oxidation
efficiency and specific rate of chlorine dioxide are only a
slight dependent on pH value in the 3-10 range.
   The  main products  of reaction  are  quinone com-
pounds  (it is likely their methyl-derivatives). However
their  quantity  didn't  correspond  to one  of oxidized
cresol  and  didn't  depend  on  pH  value.  So  during
complete  oxidation  of  cresol  in amounts  of 51 mg/1
quinone  compounds were  determined  to  be  23329
mg/1., i.e.  only 55-60% of  cresol  was  oxidized  to
quinone.
   It is  possible to  assume that  at any pH value cresol
being affected  by  CLC>2 in addition  to oxidation  to
methilquinone  undergoes more deep destruction  by
forming the decomposition products  of benzol zinc (for
example of methylmaleic acid) that are not identified in
our paper.
   Chlorine dioxide rate during oxidation insignificantly
raised as pH value increases (over  the  range  from 3  to
10) and was in amounts of 1.2 - 1.3 mg/mg.
   The tests on n-benzoquinone interaction with chlo-
rine dioxide showed that inter n-benzoquinone was not
oxidized by chlorine dioxide in acid and  neutral media.
The oxidation of n-benzoquinone  effectively occurs  in
alkaline media (pH^lO) at chlorine dioxide rate of 3 mg
per 1 mg of quinone.
   N - quinone  oxidation by chlorine dioxide in alkaline
media was found to be followed by forming carboxylic
acids among which maleic acid is the basic one.
   The  oxidation  process may be  described  by the
equations (21), (22), as follows
     0
                        CH-COOH
                      = If
                        CH-COOH
                         CH-COOH
   During oxidation process chlorine dioxide is reduced
to chlorite and chloride ions that is confirmed by its rate
(3 mg/mg i.e. twice as much of that by equation (20)
(1.5 mg/mg) and 2.5  times as less of that by  equation
(21) (7.5 mg/mg).
   On  the basis  of performed investigations into oxida-
tion both carbolic acid  and n-benzoquinone there may
be  stated that hydroquinone will be oxidized only  to
n-benzoquinone in acid and neutral media.
                                                     109

-------
   In alkaline media  the process proceeds similarly to
oxidation of quinone  by breaking a ring and forming
carboxylic  acid. For  this reason it  was of interest to
study  oxidation  process of  other  biatomic phenols
interarrangement of hydroxylic groups of which proved
to be either in meta or orto position rather than in para
one.
   The  resorcinol  solutions  (m  - dioxybenzol) were
subjected to  chlorine  dioxide  treatment. The investiga-
tion showed  that oxidation intensity of resocinol insig-
nificantly raises as pH value  increases  (Fig. 9).  So at
introducing CLC>2 in amounts of 0.5 mg per one mg. of
resorcinol the last was oxidozed by 84% at pH=3; by
91% at pH=5.5; by 94% at pH=8; by 100% at pH= value
in the range of 10.3-10.6. By using 2 mg of CLC>2 per 1
mg of resorcinol the last was oxidized completely at any
pH value. The  process occurs by forming intermediate
compounds of quinone structure (OXY - para-quinone is
assumed to be).
   In acid  media the formed intermediate compounds
are simultaneously oxidized with resorcinol.  In neutral
acid media the last do not subject to destruction until
the whole resorcinol is completely oxidized.
   The process rate  is enough high and the following
conditions are accepted to be optimal:
   — the rate of oxidizing agent is of order of 1.5-2 mg
per one mg. of resorcinol,
   — pH value is in 5.5 - 8 range.
   — the  contact time is over 20-30 minutes.
   Organic  acids and  CC>2 are  the end products  of
reaction. Both  maleic  and oxalic acids among organic
ones  are  identified  muconic  acid  is assumed  to  be
present.
   On  the  basis  of  carried  out  investigations  into
oxidation of n-benzoquinone  and resorcinol  as well as
after studying the numerous researches works we  can
conclude:
   — The  oxidation  process  rate of  diatomic  phenols
(and  quinones)  depends  on the  interarrangement of
hydroxyl  groups (and quinone  grouping). The benzol
ring  of phenol (or proper quinone) is less subjected to
breaking up under chlorine dioxide action if hydroxyl
groups (or quinone grouping) are in para-position rela-
tive  to each other (hydroquinone,  para-bezoquinone)
and  they  are distructed more readily when the  group
arrangement  is  reproduced  either  in  meta   position
(resorcinol)   or   in   orto  position   (pyrocatechol,
O-quinone).
   Methyl-derivatives  of quinone  do  not undergo to
destruction. Phenols having methyl substituent in  side
chains are  oxidized only to methyl-quinone.
   Having  studied  chlorine  dioxide  reaction in  the
presence  of some specific  substances we examined
chlorine dioxide effect on waste effluents containing
such compounds.
   The biochemically  treated refinery  plant  effluents
that contained nonoxidized oily hydrocarbons and the
products with various degree  of  their  oxidation (COD is
of  100-150 mg/1) were affected by  chlorine dioxide
effect.
   The performed experiments  showed  that the  sub-
stances retained in  mentioned  waste effluents  being
biochemically treated are oxidized only in the presence
of large excess quantity of CLO2 with maximum effect
in strong alkaline media.
   Removing COD by 90-95% is achieved by using
chlorine dioxide rate of 800-1000 mg/1 (5 - 8 mg per 1
mg of removed COD).
   Phenols that contained in refinery  plant  effluents
being biochemically treated and in smallconcentrations
(0.1-1  mg/1) are effectively oxidized by chlorine diox-
ide.  Their complete oxidation is obtained at CL02  rate
of 5  mg/1  over the period of 10-15 minutes.
   The results of comparative tests on phenol oxidation
by calcium hydrochlorite in the  same effluent indicated
that for achieving such effect "the activated chlorine"
required to be twenty times as much (100 mg/1).
   Therefore chlorine  dioxide   utilization holds  much
promise for advanced treatment of waste waters with
phenols content  in small concentrations.
     Fig. 9    3s sor •:-*}:;-  inc. ^uin^i* t3ncs^^r=.:i7n
            ve. CLC-v ^jse a" var» ju3 ^n vdiUC3.
                                                    110

-------
                     CURRENT STATUS AND DIRECTIONS OF  DEVELOPMENT OF
               PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL EFFLUENT TREATMENT IN THE PAPER INDUSTRY
                            Dr. Isaiah Gellman, Technical Director National Council
                            of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement,
                            Inc.
INTRODUCTION
   For purposes of this discussion we feel it is desirable
to advance a definition of physical-chemical treatment
sufficiently  broad  to  encompass   the  following  ap-
proaches :

•  chemical  assistance to separation processes normally
   defined as physical, such as flotation, sedimentation,
   and filtration, particularly for removal of suspended
   materials  and dewatering of a variety of sludges,

•  use of chemical  reactants to remove or chemically
   alter organic constituents of effluents whose presence
   is not desired in the receiving stream,

•  physical  treatment  of  specific  process  effluent
   streams to remove undesired chemical constituents, as
   in steam-or  air-stripping of  spent kraft  or sulfite
   liquor condensates.

   Viewed in these broad terms, physical-chemical treat-
ment is seen to have had a lengthy  history of attention
in  our industry,  and therefore been  the subject  of
changing emphasis as well. Initially it took the form of
coagulant-assisted clarification  of  wastewater, particu-
larly at waste  paperboard mills, for enhanced removal of
waste paper fines, and more highly  clarified Whitewater
for improved in-process reuse.
   More recently the emphasis  has shifted toward (a)
possibilities  for substituting physical-chemical treatment
for biological  treatment as a means of meeting effluent
standards in such areas as fine paper and tissue produc-
tion, (b) removal of biologically refractive constituents
of pulping and bleaching effluents responsible for their
color, (c)   enhanced  dewatering  of  sludges  high  in
content of hydrophilic materials, and finally (d) selective
reduction of oxygen-demanding organic constituents of
particular process wastes as part of an approach toward
optimization of design of wastewater management sys-
tems combining physical-chemical  and biological stages
deployed both within and external to the manufacturing
process.
   The  problems toward which physical-chemical treat-
ment is being  directed are therefore numerous and
include the  following, (a) improved effluent clarity
following  either  primary  or secondary  treatment,  (b)
improved  dewatering of  sludges  generated  in either
treatment system, (c) enhanced opportunities for waste-
water  reuse  in  papermaking through removal of sus-
pended matter and objectionable  organic constituents,
(d) relief of overload conditions at biotreatment facil-
ities, (e) decolorization of pulping and bleaching efflu-
ents to  avoid  receiving water  discoloration  or  other
undesired effects,  (f)  reduced possibilities for odor
emission at  biotreatment  facilities, (g) improved means
for processing neutral sulfite semichemical (NSSC) spent
liquors at non-integrated mills, and finally (h) economic
and technical optimization of wastewater management
systems.
   The technologies included in consideration of phy-
sical-chemical treatment are  therefore also  quite num-
erous   and include (a) sedimentation, (b) flotation, (c)
fine screening, (d) filtration through granular media, (e)
chemical precipitation, (f) chemical oxidation, (g) activ-
ated carbon adsorption, (h) steam or air stripping, (i) ion
exchange, (j) reverse osmosis  and ultrafiltration,and (k)
solvent extraction, and perhaps others as well.
   What  follows  in  this  paper  is  a  systematic  yet
necessarily brief and somewhat  summary discussion  of
this  broad  range of  physical-chemical  treatment  ap-
proaches, and finally some comments as to the  direc-
tions along which their  further  development and applic-
ation may lie.

SEPARATION  OF RESIDUAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS

   As  suggested  earlier, this approach has been pursued
more extensively at non-integrated fine paper and tissue
mills than at integrated chemical pulp and paper mills.
This is  particularly the  case  with  regard  to further
clarification  of  excess machine  white water  before
discharge and has included chemically-assisted flotation,
pressure  filtration, multimedia gravity  filtration and
microstraining.  More recently   consideration  has also
been   given   to   improving  the clarity  of biotreated
effluents from both integrated and non-integrated mills.

Clarification of Non-Biologically Treated Effluent

   Flotation Clarification of Tissue Mill Effluent - One
example of this approach is provided by the Scott Paper
Company facility at Fort Edward, New York. Pilot-scale
trails  at this  tissue  mill  led to a control  installation
consisting of a pressurized air flotation system followed
by continuous  centrifuge  sludge dewatering. Chemical
treatment proposed  for full-scale operation included  a
standard  cationic polyelectrolytic retention   aid  for
flotation, alum and  caustic to aid floe formation and
activated  silica for improved floe strength. Chemcial
                                                     111

-------
treatment costs were  estimated in  1967 at $110,000
annually for treatment of 6  MGD. Since placing the
system in operation in 1972 there  have been  a series of
trails of various cationic polyelectrolytes, substitution of
lime for caustic  for  flocculation  pH  control,  and
modification of the centrifuge as well. It  is believed that
this process  is capable  of removal of  85 to 90 percent of
the suspended  solids remaining after  normal fibre re-
covery and 60 to 80 percent of the  residual BOD.
   Pressure  Filtration  of Fine  Paper  Mill Effluent
Weyerhaeuser's Miquon, Pennsylvania mill produces 250
TPD of fine printing papers using pulps  delivered from
other mills,  and employed 12,000 gallons of water per
ton at the time this control  system was installed. The
mill  was equipped with  an alum and  caustic-assisted
clarifier. Uncertainties  regarding  future  water  supply
sources and  a desire to meet expected effluent standards
by  means other than biological treatment prompted a
program that would lead to  both  improved  effluent
quality  and more extensive  reuse. A  pressure  filter
evaluation program led to a  decision to  employ such a
filter  believed  capable of reducing  clarifier  effluent
suspended solids  from 0.6 Ibs per 1000 gallons by 85
percent to 0.1  Ibs per 1000  gallons. In actual practice,
however, full-scale operation produced only 50 percent
reduction, attributed to floe degradation resulting from
excessive agitation of the filter feed.(l)
   Further improvement has, however,  been effected by
addition of  a starch hydrolysis  enzyme  prior to clarif-
ication  to  eliminate  the turbidity  and suspension-
stabilizing properties of  residual  starch. Under  these
conditions filtered effluent solids have been reduced to
0.05 Ibs per 1000 gallons from a clarifier influent level
of  5.6  Ibs  per   1000  gallons. BOD  reduction  has,
however, remained below 20 percent.
   Microstrainer Clarification of Fine Papermill Effluent
— Currently serving  the Esleeck and Strathmore Paper
Company mills at  Turners  Falls,  Massachusetts  is a
microstrainer system consisting of  two  10 foot diameter
x  10 foot length  units with 23 and 35  micron screen
openings, handling 1.7 MGD. Coagulation and filtration
aids now in  use include an anionic polyelectrolyte at a 1
ppm dosage, and either alum or caustic for  pH adjust-
ment. Coupled with measure to (a) reduce starch usage
and  improve retention,  and  (b)  tighten control  over
water  usage,  turbidity,  suspended  solids  and  BOD
reduction have reached 93, 98  and  88 percent respec-
tively.  Deposition on the screens  which  interferes with
successful operation  is overcome by periodic treatment
with 10  percent phosphoric acid. The sludge produced is
dewatered in a nearby municipal system  at a cost  of $ 1
per ton  of  paper production in addition to the normal
operating costs of $2.50 (1973  data)  for the micro-
strainer system. (2) (3).

   Polishing  Filtration of Primary Effluent -  Studies by
our organization at a coated fine paper mill have shown
erratic results stemming from frequent grade changes
and  resultant changes  in effluent composition. Using
polymeric  addition  to  an alum  and  caustic-assisted
clarifier effluent, BOD reductions during polishing re-
mained below 40 percent while suspended solids and
turbidity were reduced by 80 and 60 percent respective-
ly. No provisions were developed for disposal of the
backwashed solids and this problem still remains to be
resolved. (4)

Clarification of Biologically Treated Effluent

   The specifications of a small full-scale system serving
a tissue mill, and the results of several pilot plant trails
are summarized below.

   Clarification  of  Tissue  Mill  Effluent -  Ponderosa
Products at  Flagstaff, Arizona  currently  produces 40
TPD non-integrated tissue and provides 10 days aerated
stabilization basin treatment followed by effluent polish-
ing in two anthracite/sand mixed media gravity filters
operated at 2 to 4 gallons/sq.  ft./min. The filtrate is
chlorinated and recycled to the mill as process water.

   Clarification  of  Kraft-NSSC  Cross-Recovery  Mill
Effluent — The Great Southern Paper Company at Cedar
Springs, Georgia discharges an aerated stabilization basin
effluent containing 65 ppm suspended solids. Coagula-
tion  tests indicated an alum requirement for flocculation
of 70 ppm. Using multimedia filtration and no chemical
treatment a  reduction of  50 percent suspended solids
was  achieved at 2  gal/sq.ft./min with  no measurable
BOD reduction. Alum dosage produced no  discernible
benefits in either BOD or suspended solids reduction.
Scaleup costs for a 20 MGD system serving a 2000 TPD
mill  indicated that  costs for reducing suspended solids
from 12.5  to 4.2 Ibs per ton product  would exceed $3
per ton. (5).

   Polishing Filtration of Secondary Effluents — Studies
by our  organization  using  three different filtration
approaches indicated modest suspended solids and BOD
reduction benefits  with alum and polymer  additions,
with  the  problems  of  filter  backwash  disposal  still
remaining to be resolved. (4)

   Microstraining of Secondary  Effluent — The micro-
staining process  is currently being commercialized at an
integrated bleached kraft mill practicing activated sludge
treatment. The system will contain three 6 foot diam. x
8 foot units using a 21 micron polyester fabric, loaded at
1300 gal/minute/filter.  Backwash flow is to consume 2
percent of the  throughput. Pilot plant  results indicate
expected removals of 70 percent suspended solids and
30 percent BOD. (6)

Upgrading of Filtered Effluents for Process Reuse

   The  Weyerhaeuser, Miquon  mill has also  explored
                                                      112

-------
reuse possibilities for its pressure-filtered primary efflu-
ent. Filtrate  color presents  one obstacle to such reuse
due to the variety of white and colored grades produced.
This problem has been minimized by filtrate chlorina-
tion at a  3.5  ppm dosage rate. Slime  accumulations
accompanying reuse were also minimized by a special
tank cleaning schedule. A major improvement in resue
capability was,  however, achieved  by introduction  of
enzymes for  residual starch hydrolysis as noted earlier.
Currently, recycled effluent accounts for 50 percent of
total daily water use.

SEPARATION OF  DISSOLVED ORGANIC  MATER
IALS

   Among  the  physical-chemical treatment  approaches
considered here are (a) condensate stripping and process-
ing, (b) NSSC spent  liquor processing and integration of
reverse osmosis in the NSSC machine water system, and
(c) use of activated carbon in papermill effluent systems.

Processing  of Chemical Pulping Liquor Recovery Con-
densates

   Progress has been  recorded recently in this area for
both kraft and sulfite liquor condensates as follows:

   Kraft Condensate Processing — An early approach to
condensate stripping for BOD load reduction  was report-
ed  by  Estridge  (7) in which evaporator condensates,
barometric condenser water and  turpentine  decanter
underflow at an 850 ton per day  linerboard mill were
recycled to a cooling tower. Aeration of these process
streams in this  manner  achieved a  load reduction  of
10,000  Ibs BOD per day due  almost exclusively to air
stripping of methanol  and other volatiles. An inherent
drawback  lay, however,  in the transfer  of odorous
volatiles such as terpenes and  organic sulfides  to  the
atmosphere.
   This  deficiency has been met by  systems employing
either air or  steam  stripping with the stripped material
being burned at a  subsequent combustion  unit.  An
example of such a system  is that in operation at  the
Mead Corporation mill at Escanaba, Michigan. Initially
this 800  ton bleached  kraft  mill  installed  a steam
stripper handling hot water  accumulator overflow, tur-
pentine  decanter overflow, evaporator condensates and
miscellaneous hot odorous streams. The initial objective
was to reduce odor release at the biotreatment system.
This was  accomplished  using a fractional  distillation
column 53 feet high containing 24 trays, and steamed at
a 2.5  percent rate, with non-condensibles and  collected
foul air burned in the lime kiln (8).
   In  1973 a program was begun to  determine whether
the mill BOD load could be significantly reduced as well.
Analysis showed that the stripper bottoms contained 15
to  18,000 Ibs BOD  daily and that  90 percent of this
was  accounted  for  by the  methanol  present in  the
condensates.  Modifications to the system  enabled  the
steam feed to be  increased to 8  percent  so  that  the
residual BOD was reduced to 4 to  5,000 Ibs daily for a
net reduction of 11 to 13,000 Ibs daily. Total steam and
power requirements are reported as 8000 Ibs/hr of 60 psi
steam and 65  HP for pumping condensates.

   Sulfite Condensate Processing - Currently underway
at the  Flambeau Paper Company, Park Falls, Wisconsin
sulfite  mill is a project  directed toward demonstrating
the possibilities  for  recovering methanol,  furfural and
acetic acid as ethyl  acetate from  sulfate liquor evapo-
ration  condensates. The process being  investigated in-
volves steam  stripping and activated carbon adsorption
to achieve removal and separation of these components.
This investigation  expands  on  a project previously
conducted at  the Institute of Paper Chemistry. (9)
   Another physical-chemical treatment approach  perti-
nent to sulfite liquor condensates  involves the upward
adjustment of spent liquor pH prior to evaporation so as
to retain  the  volatile acids in  the liquor  concentrate,
permitting their destruction in the liquor furnace, rather
than allowing their entry into the condensates. Previous
studies have shown that upward adjustment  of liquor pH
from 2.5  to  4.0 could  result in condensate BOD load
reduction from 150 to 200 Ibs per ton to 50 Ibs per ton.
(10).

Processing of NSSC  Spent Liquor and Excess Machine
Water

   Spent Liquor Processing  — Sonoco Products, Inc. at
Hartsville, S.C. recently has patented and  commercial-
ized a novel process which facilitates the incineration of,
and subsequent chemical recovery from its spent sodi-
um-base  NSSC liquor. Essentially, the  NSSC  liquor is
concentrated  in multiple effect evaporators to  40  to 50
percent solids and  mixed  with finely divided reactive
alumina hydrate to form sodium aluminate which results
in solidification of  the liquor concentrate. A rotary
pelletizer  converts the  solidified liquor  to  small pellets
with desirable incineration properties.  First, a reducing
atmosphere  is  maintained  within  the pellet, leading
ultimately to formation of sodium aluminate and SO2.
Second,  elevated  temperature burning is possible  at
1800°F. The ash is dissolved and used to scrub the SO2,
thereby releasing a hydrated alumina  cake for recycle
and  producing sodium  sulfite solution for use in new
NSSC cook liquor. (11)

   Processing of Excess NSSC Machine Water  - Green
Bay  Packaging Company  at Green Bay, Wisconsin  has
made a novel installation of reverse osmosis technology
designed  to assist the operation of a high dissolved  solids
machine  water system. Excess water is bled out of the
system through a small 20 gpm  reverse  osmosis unit
                                                    113

-------
containing  300 separation modules, and reused as fresh
water for pump seals. This has assisted in reducing mill
BOD load to less than 10 Ibs per ton product. (12)

Removal of Organic Materials from Paper Mill Effluents
Using Activated Carbon

   Explorations of activated carbon treatment have been
undertaken at a  number of non-integrated paper mills
involving in several instances combined treatment with
municipal  sewage.  Included  among these are  (a)  St.
Regis, Bucksport, Maine, (b)  Fitchburg Papers, Fitch-
burg, Massachusetts, (c) Mohawk Papers, Wateford, New
York and  (d) Neenah,  Menasha, Wisconsin. Details of
several such projects are as follows:
   Fitchburg,  Mass.  -  Pilot  studies  for a  full scale
project involving 14 MGD from two paper mills and 1.25
MGD municipal effluent were conducted using a process
consisting of chemical coagulation with alum, sedimenta-
tion and  activated carbon column  treatment. Process
results indicated an anticipated  50 percent BOD reduc-
tion through coagulation, followed by 82 and 86 percent
reduction in COD and BOD passing through four carbon
columns at 3.4  gal/sq. ft./min. The activated carbon
process  design  criteria selected  were 7.2  Ibs carbon/lb
BOD  at exhaustion, 30  minutes  contact  time,  and
reactivation in a multiple hearth furnace. Costs were
estimated at $2.1 million for construction of the carbon
system in 1970, and $140,000 for annual operation, of
which 70  percent is  carbon makeup. The facility  has
been  constructed,  but  operating results are   not  yet
available. (13)
   Neenah  - Menasha, Wisconsin —  A pilot plant study
was performed using municipal  sewage containing 80
percent  paper mill effluent. The process studied involved
chemical coagulation with ferric chloride, sedimentation,
high  rate  filtration at  12 gal/sq.  ft/min. to  remove
fibrous material followed by a second filtration stage at
9  gal/sq.  ft/min  through  PVC media, and  upflow
expanded bed filtration  through  1440 mesh carbon at 3
to 5 gal/sq. ft./min. Results obtained by the IPC study
group indicated removals of BOD, COD and suspended
solids prior to carbon  treatment of  76, 83  and  98
percent  respectively. Following carbon treatment, over-
all reductions were increased to 93,95 and 99.5 percent
respectively. Project costs were estimated in 1973 at 17
cents  per  1000  gal capital and  35  cents  per  1000 gal
operating for a total  of 52 cents per 1000 gal for a 10
MGD plant. (14)

DECOLORIZATION  OF  KRAFT  PULPING  AND
BLEACHING EFFLUENTS

   Basic  Elements of Effluent Decolorization Problem
Definition
   Measurement  of Effluent and Receiving Water Color
Levels -  Selection  of methods for measurement of
pulping-  and bleaching-  derived color has  always
proceeded from the observed similarity in hue between
so-called natural water  color  of swmp or decaying
vegetation origin and that of mill effluents. Starting with
color wheel visual  comparators we have evolved most
recently   to  single   wavelength  spectrophotometric
measurements in  the spectral range  of 450 to  480 mu
where  both  effluents and the  cobalt-chloroplatinate
standard display flat adsorption curves.
   The  procedure  most recently  found  useful  (15)
involves pH adjustment  to 7.6 followed by filtration
through an 0.8 micron porosity membrane filter so as to
produce  a  high clarity  sample  without significant  re-
moval of non-filterable color. Color is then determined
by  light  absorption  measurement  at  465  mu  and
expressed  in standard color units read against a calibra-
tion curve prepared with the above standard. While this
procedure  is  not  as yet  incorporated in Standard
Methods it has been recognized by EPA in its proposed
effluent color standards.

   Detectible Changes in Receiving Water Color - One
major problem definition deficiency continues  to exist
in the most important area of all, namely a determina-
tion of  the variability  in level of color detectibility in
different receiving waters, and at different points along
or overlooking such waters. We have recently completed
a pioneering investigation of this problem. These studies
have employed professionally screened observer panels
to determine (a) absolute thresholds of detectible color
level, (b)  perceptible  changes  from  a given  visually
observable reference color level, and (c) the influence of
lighting  conditions,  water depth and quality, and observ-
er angle. The importance of such information in estab-
lishing rational water quality standards and  ultimately
defining the goals of decolorization technology research
is  seemingly  obvious,  yet such work has  not  bee
previously reported.

   Adverse  or Beneficial  Effects  of  Receiving  Water
Color — Aside  from human objection to receiving water
discoloration on  aesthetic grounds, little  of substance
has been heard concerning other adverse effects. Occa-
sional  comments are  made  concerning possible inter-
ference  with  light   energy penetration for support of
photosynthetic primary  productivity processes, yet no
evidence is presented to this effect. On the contrary, our
own  aquatic   biology  productivity  work  using  high
concentrations of biotreated colored effluents indicate
the  absence  of effects  above  color levels  that would
probably  be detected by  humans.  Downstream  water
supply treatment  problems receive only isolated mention
as a basis for setting decolorization requirements.

   Inventory of Mill Process Color Loads and Sources —
Color load inventories are proceeding actively at selected
mills where  decolorization  needs  have  already  been
identified as  a  consequence  of  inadequate receiving
                                                      114

-------
water dilution. Often these reflect application of some
control  measures, and do not therefore provide neces-
sary broad background information. We have recently
completed a field survey of both bleached and unbleach-
ed chemical pulp mills, supplemented by determination
of the color contribution potential of numerous spent
pulping liquors, since these are the major source of pulp
mill color  load. Preliminary findings  for  kraft  mills
indicate a color equivalency of 2 Ibs of color units per Ib
of hardwood  liquor  solids, and  1.2  Ibs for  softwood
liquors. On a mill-wide basis the average pulp  mill color
load appears  to  fall  between 100 and 200  Ibs per ton.
With  regard  to  the bleach  plant  itself,  the survey
indicates that the  first two  stages  (chlorination  and
caustic extraction) account for 200 Ibs color per ton at
hardwood mills, while in softwood operations the load is
350 Ibs.

   Chemical  Precipitation  Processes  for Effluent  De-
colorization

   General  Basis for Precipitation Processes  and  their
Current Variants — The principal approach  to chemical
precipitation  has involved use of lime for that purpose.
More recently magnesium oxide has received attention
for NSSC effluent decolorization, while alum has recent-
ly found application  for kraft effluent.  As  determined
by  fundamental  investigation at the New  York State
College  of Forestry at Syracuse University (16) (17) the
metal ion precipitation processes  are all  dependent  on
the relatively low solubility of the metallic salts of the
colored weak organic acids.
   A number of mill-scale variations on the lime precipi-
tation  process  have  evolved in  the  last fifteen years
including:
   • The  massive  lime process  involving slaking  of
reburned lime in  caustic extract  followed by re-solution
of the  precipitated  color in the recausticizing process
and  ultimately burning of the colored organics in  the
recovery furnace,
   • addition of minimal lime dosages to total unbleach-
ed kraft effluent in the primary clarifier, precipitating
the color and dewatering the sludge in admixture with
the lime mud, and burning the color in the lime kiln,
   • precipitation of colored substances in the caustic
extract  or other specific colored effluents using minimal
amounts of  lime slurry  followed  by  dewatering  in
admixture with lime mud and burning  of  the colored
organics in the lime kiln, or use of lime mud, fortified
with additional reburned lime or hydrate, to precipitate
color and again destruction in the kiln.


   Massive  Lime Treatment -  This process  received
large-scale  studies at  International  Paper's Springhill,
Louisiana mill  from  1970 to 1971 and was foimd to
remove   over  90  percent  of the caustic extract  and
unbleached  decker effluent, or about 60 to 70 percent
the process color load. A dosage of 20,000 ppm lime
produced a  sludge settleable to 18  to 22 percent solids
and filterable to 50 percent for subsequent recausticizing
use.  The demonstration  plant was rated  at 530 gpm
flow. An ability to produce a 740  color unit effluent was
demonstrated using the entire lime kiln output to treat
one-seventh  of the mill  flow.  Costs  were found to
approximate $1.80 per ton of bleached pulp. While the
reuse  of white  liquor  was  not affected, needs for
expansion of pulping liquor preparation and recovery
were  identified.  These  have  included  (a)  15  to  20
percent additional capacity for green liquor slaking and
causticizing,  white liquor clarification  and  lime mud
washing, and  (b)  2  to  8 percent  increases  in pulp
washing, black liquor evaporation, recovery furnace and
accessories,  and  lime  mud  filtration  and  lime  kiln
facilities. (18)
   Since completion  of the  EPA  contract mentioned
above, the demonstration  facilities have been operated
using  the lime mud modification with sweetener lime
added  as needed to meet stoichiometric lime require-
ments.  Both  caustic  extract  and  pulp  mill  decker
effluent  have been  studied with  apparent success as
regards  effluent decolorization and quality of  the re-
burned  lime, although caustic extract alone appears to
be  more readily  decolorized using  the massive lime
alternative.

   Lime Precipitation  of Color  During  Primary  Clarif-
ication  — The  first trial of this decolorization approach
was undertaken by Interstate Paper Company with EPA
support  at  the  Riceboro, Georgia  unbleached  kraft
linerboard mill in 1968. Initial state permit requirements
for discharge to an extremely low flow estuary allowed a
color level  of  30 units, so  as  to  prevent  excessive
discharge of  slowly  degradable  lignin-derived  organic
matter  that  would remain unoxidized  during biotreat-
ment.
   A  lime  precipitation  process  was installed  at the
primary clarifier  of this  initially 4000  TPD  mill  at a
$451,000 cost. A dosage of 1000 ppm lime reduced the
color level from 1200 units to as little as 125 units. The
resultant sludge was sent to lagoon storage. Recarbon-
ation trials  have  shown  that 20 minutes residence time
and lime kiln stack gas  reduces residual lime from 750
ppm  to 120 ppm. During these  trials  recarbonation
occured naturally  in a  large  nonaerated  biooxidation
basin. Here  some color reversion  ocurred, probably as a
result of alkaline extraction from the  lagoon bottom.
Costs were estimated at $2 per ton total. (19)
   The  Continental Can Company,  Hodge, Louisiana
mill recently  completed work  on an  EPA-supported
contract  involving  full-scale  demonstration  of  yet
another  patented lime  process modification (20) (21).
The process involves use of low lime dosages at the point
of primary  clarification  of unbleached  kraft and NSSC
                                                      115

-------
boardmill effluents, followed by solid bowl centrifuga-
tion and  calcining in the lime kiln for both fibrous
sludge  disposal  and  lime recovery. The decolorized
effluent  is recarbonated  and clarified again  with the
additional sludge dewatered  on the lime mud vacuum
filter  before  calcining.  Color  reduction averaged 80
percent during periods of no NSSC production, and at
least 15 percent  less with NSSC pulping operations. The
process is believed capable of over 90 percent decoloriza-
tion when operating on kraft  alone. Operating  costs
alone were estimated  at 50
-------
osmosis processing of a number of pulp and paper waste
streams were reported in 1972 by Wiley et al. (19) (20)
Color rejection from kraft caustic bleach effluent was in
excess of 99 percent at inlet pressures of 500 psi at 35°C,
using cellulose acetate  membranes. Optimum perform-
ance was achieved when concentrating the dilute feed by
a factor of about 10 for further separate processing and
chemical recovery of the concentrate.
   It was, however, not possible to demonstrate sustain-
ed, long-term process operating feasibility in the extend-
ed  life performance  tests of the membrane equipment
available for  these studies because of  the low levels of
reliability of available membrane equipment. A tentative
cost estimate of $0.82  per  1000 gal. of product water
produced  from  caustic  bleach  effluent  was  reported.
Process costs appear quite sensitive to membrane module
replacement  and  maintenance  charges,  to membrane
permeation rates, and to increases in osmotic pressure as
concentration increases. Membrane fouling due to mater-
ial  buildup  on the membrane  surface is also cited as
responsible for permeate yield rate decrease, and may
therefore  require extensive  pretreatment  or cross-flow
application at high velocities.
   Ultrafiltration —  Reduction  of color  in  pulp  mill
effluents  by ultrafiltration has been  examined  by
Champion International Corporation with partial assist-
ance form EPA with a 10,000 gallon per day (gpd) pilot
plant. This  approach was justified on the basis that  the
colored materials are of high molecular weight  (> 1000).
Treated  streams included  decker  effluents  and pine
bleachery  caustic extraction filtrate, which together
comprise  about 80 percent of the color from a bleached
kraft mill.  The  pilot  plant consisted of a  five-stage
circular wound  cellulose acetate membrane  unit. High
color removal  (90 to  97 percent) was  demonstrated
when operating at water recovery ratios of 98.5 to 99
percent. Pilot plant capacity  (membrane flux) was 15 to
20 gal/day/ft-'  when  operation proceeded  smoothly.
However, plugging  of  the  membrane  cartridges  by
residual particulates (even  after precoat  filtration) was
troublesome.
   Several prefiltration, concentrate disposal, and water
reuse alternatives were evaluated.
   Full-scale  plant designs, and approximate capital and
operating costs were estimated for systems of 1 and 2
MGD capacity.  Capital costs were projected at about
$700,000 for a  1  MGD plant,  and $1,200,000  for a 2
MGD plant. Corresponding operating costs were projec-
ted at about 45o:/1000 gal (1  MGD) and 38
-------
agement  concerning  commercialization  of  ozone  de-
colorization.
   An  example  of the chlorination  approach lies  in
limited use  at  perhaps five to ten mills and involves
substitution  of a hypochlorite stage for the conventional
caustic extraction stage. Since the latter contributes at
least 75 to 80 percent of the bleach plant color load, its
elimination  can result in major  load reduction.  The
process  change  does not  appear  to  be  universally
applicable and  results in  substantial   chemical  cost
increments.  Most  recently  investigators  at  Hooker
Chemical have proposed this modification as an "anti-
pollution," or APS, sequence yielding a 62 to 82 percent
color reduction. The change involves using large amounts
of chlorine dioxide immediately before the chlorination
stage in addition to substitution of sodium hypochlorite
for the caustic extraction stage (34).
   A preliminary  investigation  of radiation-enhanced
oxidation of pulpmill effluents for color reduction has
been completed under our sponsorship at the Oak Ridge
National  Laboratory  (35).  The  results indicate  that
exposure to 10   Roentgens in the presence of 500 psi
oxygen can achieve 90 percent decolorization.

DEWATERING OF HYDROUS SLUDGES

   Sludges of a hydrous nature are being encountered
with increasing frequency  as  a  consequence of (a)
improved capture of long-fibre sludge components, (b)
generation of excess biological cell material  sludges in
activated  sludge  treatment, (c)  production of organic
sludges  during  lime  and  alum-assisted coagulation or
precipitation of fibre fines and colored materials, respec-
ively. Polymer-assisted dewatering of such  sludges is
receiving increased  attention, as are efforts to improve
their dewatering characteristics through changes in phys-
ical  state  (freezing  and thawing, and pressurized steam
treatment).
   More  recently interest has been renewed in solvent
addition processes capable of separating water from such
sludges, followed by distillation of the solvent from the
aqueous phase for reuse, as well as its recovery from the
sludge as it is  subsequently  dried. Triethylamine is
currently receiving consideration for this purpose.
   (1)  The  need for  development  of more  efficient
control systems  to match the continued growth in size
and complexity  of pulp and paper manufacturing facil-
ities  at locations presenting substantial water quality
protection problems.
   (2)  The need for new control technologies capable of
removing effluent constituents  that are only minimally
influenced by the more conventional sedimentation-bio-
treatment technology, such as effluent color, and possi-
bly foam generation.
   (3)  The  desire  to assemble optimized waste water
management systems combining  a variety  of control
technologies so as to assure their most cost effective and
dependable operation.
   (4)  The desire to increase opportunities for reuse of
treated process wastewater both for water conservation
purposes and to minimize discharge.
   Some of the areas that suggest themselves for possible
cooperative study include the following:
   (1)  Determination of water quality needs  for both
pulp and paper manufacture as a  guide to development
of specific effluent treatment objectives — hence identi-
fying  further physical-chemical treatment possibilities.
   (2)  Development  of standardized test procedures for
evaluation of polymeric  or other chemical aids  to  the
dewatering of sludges and the clarification of effluents.
   (3)  Examination  of the effectiveness of various in-
process streams  for regeneration  of resin systems used
for decolorization, as well as activated carbon.
   (4)  Examination of chemical recovery steps available
for achieving reuse of calcium and aluminum cations for
precipitation of colored effluent components.
   Finally,  common  attention might  be given to  an
examination of  those environmental quality  problems
confronting our industry which our limited experience
in physical-chemical  treatment leads us to believe should
be addressed by such technology  in proper combination
with the more  widespread sedimentation-biotreatment
technology.
 SUMMARY  -  DEVELOPMENTAL  TRENDS  AND
 POSSIBLE AREAS FOR COOPERATIVE STUDY

   It should be evident from this necessarily brief review
 of physical-chemical treatment applications and possibil-
 ities  that  they  cover  a  wide range  of approaches,
 objectives and technologies. While such treatment is only
 beginning to gain a position in the spectrum of control
 technologies in actual use, the possibilities are encourag-
 ing for their further development.  This stems from four
 basic considerations, as follows:
                                                     118

-------
E.L., U.S. Patent 3,639,206 (February

E.L. "Color Removal and Sludge Re-
   (15) "An  Investigation of Improved Procedures for
Measurement of  Mill  Effluent and  Receiving  Water
Color," NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 253 (December
1971)
   (16) "The  Mechanisms  of Color Removal in the
Treatment  of Pulping and Bleaching  Effluents with
Lime-I Treatment of Caustic Extraction Stage Bleaching
Effluent,"  NCASI Technical Bulleting  No. 239  (July
1970)
   (17) "The  Mechanisms  of Color Removal in the
Treatment  of Pulping and Bleaching  Effluents with
Lime-II Treatment of  Chlorination Stage  Bleaching
Effluents," NCASI Technical  Bulletin No.  242  (Dec-
ember  1970)
   (18) "Color Removal from Kraft Pulp Mill Effluents
by Massive Lime Treatment," EPA Report 122-73-086
(February 1973)
   (19) "Color Removal from Kraft Pulping Effluent by
lime Addition," EPA Technology Transfer, 2nd Capsule
Report (1973)
   (20) Spruill,
1972)
   (21) Spruill,
covery  from  Total Mill  Effluent,"  Tappi 56 (4) :98
(1973)
   (22) Environmental  Applications   of  Advanced
Instrument Analyses: Assistance Project F7 69-71, p. 50
EPA Report R2-74-155 (May 1973)
   (23) Gould, M., U.S. Patent 3,531,370 (September
1970)
   (24) Fuller, R.R., U.S. Patent 3,627,679 (December
1971)
   (25) Berger, H.F.  and  Smith, D.R.,  "Waste  Water
Renovation," Tappi 51 (10) 37A (1968)
   (26) McGlasson, W.G., Thibodeaux, L.J. and Berger,
H.F., "Potential Uses of Activated Carbon for Waste-
water Renovation," Tappi 49 (12) 521 (1966)
   (27) NCASI Stream Improvement Technical Bulletin
No.  199,  "Treatment  of Pulp Mill Effluents  with
Activated Carbn," (1967)
   (28) Wiley, A.J., Dubey, G.A. and  Bansal,  I.K.,
"Reverse Osmosis  Concentration of Dilute Pulp and
Paper Effluents," EPA Final Report Project No. 12040
EEL (1972)
   (29) Wiley, A.J., Schaarpf, K. Bansal,  I.K. and Arps,
D., Tappi55(12} 1671(1972)
   (30) Rohm and Haas Co., "Decolorization  of Kraft
Bleaching Effluents Using Amberlite  XAD-8 Polymeric
Adsorbent," (Aug. 1971)
   (31) Sanks, R.K., "Ion Exchange  Color and Mineral
Removal from  Kraft  Bleach Wastes,"   EPA Report
R2-73-255 (May 1973)
                                          (32) Chamberlin, T.A. etal  "Color Removal From
                                        Bleached  Kraft Effluents," Proc. 1975 TAPPI Environ-
                                        mental Conference
                                          (33) "Preliminary  Laboratory Studies of the  De-
                                        colorization and Bactericidal Properties of Ozone  in Pulp
                                        and Paper Mill Effluents," NCASI Technical Bulletin
                                        No. 269 (January 1974)
                                          (34) Lowe, K.E., "Bleaching at Crossroads," Pulp &
                                        Paper p. 88 (August 1973)
                                          (35) "A Preliminary Investigation of Radiation  and
                                        Enhanced Oxidation of  Pulp Mill  Effluents for Color
                                        Reduction,"  NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 271 (Febru-
                                        ary  1974)
                                   119

-------
              TREATMENT OF CONCENTRATED WASTE WATERS CONTAINING OIL EMULSIONS.
                              by  V.G.  Ponomarev  and  S.B.  Zakharina  Ail-Union
                              Scientific-Research Institute VODGEO.
   For metal cutting in mechanical shops special cutting
oils and coolants are used representing stable emulsions
with the mineral oil content up to 50 g/1.
   For the preparation  of such coolants cutting emul-
sions  are  used, defined  as  concentrated emulsions  of
mineral oil and emulsifying agents of the  type "water in
oil". Various organic matters can be used as emulsifying
agents. When  cutting emulsions are mixed with water,
phase reversel takes place and  "oil in water" emulsion
generates  spontaneously.  Cutting emulsion content  in
the  emulsion  generated  is   equal  to 5-10  per cent.
Sometimes soda is  introduced into  it in quantity  of
0.03%, pH of the emulsions used varies from 7 to 10.
   An Analysis of the emulsion  content in the process of
its use at  the machine-building plant  has revealed that
during its  service-life all its components are present in it
in proportional quantities. Any significant changes in oil
and emulsifying agents contents or  in the alkalinity are
not observed.
   Despite high resistance to degradation, service life of
emulsions  averages about a  month, after this they are
renewed.
   Increase in the coolant's  viscosity  as  a  result of the
liquid phase evaporation  serves  as one of the reasons for
its service  life reduction. To prevent it water is periodic-
ally added to the coolant.
   In the  process  of its use  the  coolant  is polluted by
mechanical impurities, the main part  of which consists
of  metal  particles  and  of grinding  materials. These
admixtures concentration is  constantly increasing, which
can make  the further use of the emulsion impossible. In
order to  prolong its service life  the waste emulsion
should be subjected  to  mechanical treatment.  At  the
Soviet enterprises  waste  emulsion before its  return for
reuse is   usually  fed  to installations for mechanical
treatment, such as settling  tanks,  magnetic  separators
and filters manufactured from different materials.
   Coolant's  decay as a result  of  the anaeobic micro
flora  of sulphate-reducing bacteria growth in it is the
third reason  for  the coolant  service  life  reduction.
Bacteria  reduce sulphate present  in  the  emulsion  to
hydrogen  sulphide.
   To prevent emulsion decay in the course of its service
it is recommended to blow  it  off by air, thus creating
aerobic conditions and  preventing anaerobic  bacteria
growth.
   Blowing off is  recommended to  carry out in collect-
ing reservoires installed near the lathes,  so compressed
air should be fed to the lathes.
   At the  enterprises in operation where construction of
air  conduits  is  not  possible,  for  decay  prevention
bactericidal matters such as hexachlorophen are added
to the emulsion in quantity of 0.02% of the emulsion
volume. As analyses  showed, addition of hexachloro-
phen  prolongs  service life  of the emulsion  up  to  4
months.
   Based on the bench-scale and industrial tests a general
technological scheme  of an  installation for waste emul-
sion regeneration was developed (Fig. I). According to
this scheme polluted emulsion is fed to the setting tank
(I), where  suspended matter and  oil  are  separated.
Floated oil is fed to the oil collector (5), and suspended
matter collected in the conic  part is introduced to the
sludge-holding  tank (4). Treatment of emulsion  from
fine suspended solids  is conducted on filters (2). After
being treated on filters the emulsion is pumped  over to
the seltling-reacting tank (3) to which if necessary and if
there  is odour of hydrogen sulphide 15 mg/1 of KMnO4,
I g/1 of sodium nitrate and 0.2 g/1  of hexachlorophen in
the alkali  solution are added. Besides, to renew emulsion
properties cutting emulsion and water are to be added to
it. After all components were  added to  the emulsion, it
is mixed with the compressed air, then settled to  remove
non-ernulsified  oil  and then  is fed  to the shop. Oil
isolated in the  settling-reacting tank is pumped  over to
the oil collector  (5)  and then is fed to regeneration.
Sludge from the sludge-holding tank is  fed to the  filter
presses for dehydration (6).
   Technical-economic evaluation of the suggested emul-
sion regeneration scheme shows that regeneration of 10
m^/day of the emulsion will permit to save about 21000
rubles per year.
   It waste emulsions  can not regenerate, they should be
decontaminated at the installations for their breaking.
   While  emulsions are settling  within 1-3  months oil
concentration in them decreases only by 10-20 per cent.
Due to high  stability of emulsive  waste  waters  they
should be treated with the use of such chemical-physical
methods   as  coagulation, pressure flotation  with the
addition of reagents and centrifugation.
   In  the  emulsion coagulation analyses ferric salts, salts
of aluminium, calcium, magnesium, which at hydrolysis
give positively charged colloids of hydroxides, were used
as reagents. At their  interaction with the negatively
charged micelles  of the emulsion mutual  coagulation
takes  place  with the formation of suspensions, contain-
ing particles  of   metal  hydroxides, sorbing at  their
surfaces drops of oil and of emulsifying agents.
   Application  of ferric sulfate  with  the addition of
lime,  ferric chlorate with sulfuric acid and aluminium
sulfate with lime or sodium hydrate have appeared to be
the most effective for  emulsion  breaking.  Dosage of
coagulants varies within the  range  of 3-7 g/1 depending
on the emulsified oil content.
                                                     120

-------
                                                                              steaai
                                                                                         chlorophen
                            Fig.I  Scheme  of emulsion regeneration
   As  analyses  indicated,  the  volume of  the  sludge
separated averages 17-20 per cent of the total effluent.
Depending on the oil concentration the sludge can take
different positions in the settling tank, that is to settle to
the bottom of the tank, or to float to the surface. In a
number of cases the sludge formed is located in the form
of floes  along the whole  volume of the settling tank.
That is why the determination of the method for sludge
separation  from the  waste  emulsion  is  one  of the
important problems.
   The method of pressure flotation with the application
of  reagents  was investigated,  and  the investigations
showed that this method is possible to be applied for the
purpose in view. It  was discovered at the pilot plant that
saturation  of  the  emulsion  with  the air should  be
conducted at the pressure of 3 atm., and the saturation
            filter-press             .    ^ regeneration


                   Pig.2  Scheme of emulsion breaking by flotation
                                                      121

-------
duration is 5  minutes and the flotation period should be
abaut 15-20 minutes. Reagents should be added to the
emulsion immediately before the saturator.
   Optimum doses of coagulating agents at the emulsion
oil content of 30 g/1  are equal to:
  aluminium sulfate
  ferrous  sulfate
  ferrous  chloride
g/1
g/1
                                6
                                7
                                4 g/1
  with addition of sulfuric acid 6 g/1

   The volume of the foam formed is equal to 20-25% of
the effluent being treated volume.
   The content of ether soluble matters in  the treated
waste is equal to 0.15 - 0.3 g/1. The analysis showed that
mineral oil concentration was equal to 50-70 mg/1, and
the residual ether soluble matters are emulsifying agents.
   With the  aim of the foam  volume  decrease in view,
tests were carried out with the Soviet flocculating agents
available,  such as  the "Komet" flocculating agent and
polyacrylamide.  It was established that at  these floc-
culating agents dose of  10-100  mg/1 the foam volume is
possible  to   be  decreased by  30-50%.  "The  Komet"
flocculating agent has appeared to be the most  effective.
   As a result  of  the investigations in  the centrifugal
field  ability  for waste emulsion  degradation it was
established that emulsions  were broken at separation
factor of 7500,  centrifugation period being  equal  to
15-60 minutes and depends on the emulsion  composi-
tion.  Before  centrifugation the emulsion  should  be
treated by sulfuric acid to reach minimum pH value,
taking into   consideration corrosive properties  of  the
metal, the centrifuge is made of (Fig. 3).
   Being acidified  to  pH  =  7  emulsions are broken  by
60-80%.  Several types  of the  emulsions used may  be
broken  in the  centrifugal  field  by  90-98%  at their
acidification up to  pH = 3.
   Centrifugation  may   be  used as  an independent
method for emulsive effluent treatment when acid-proof
equipment is available.  Final treatment  of the effluent
may be conducted jointly with the total effluent of the
enterprise.
   On  the basis of the  investigations carried  out, a
scheme of  the  full-scale installation for  waste  oil
emulsions degradation was developed which is now being
built at several industrial plants (Fig. 2).
   According to this scheme waste emulsion  is directed
from the shop to the settling tank (I) to which sulfuric
acid is fed. Mixing with the acid is carried on by means
of compressed air. Thus pH of the emulsion  is reduced
to 6-7. After waste emulsion was settled during an hour
floated oil is fed to the oil collector (2), and the sludge is
introduced to  the sludge-holing tank (3).  Emulsion,
which  was  not broken in the settling tank  is  fed to the
flotation unit, where the second stage of its treatment is
carried on.
   Coagulating  agent,  which is fed from  the dose, is
mixed  with the effluent before the saturator (4). The
saturator should be designed in such  a way, that  all
discharge  of the emulsive effluent passes through it.
Emulsion  saturated with the  air is introduced  to the
flotation compartment  (5).  The condensed foam  is
skimmed off the surface of the flotation compartment
and is  fed  to the foam collector (6). Clarified liquid is
neutralized by means of NaOh, water or lime to pH = 7,
and then is discharged to the sewerage system where it is
mixed  with the  waste  waters  from the enterprises and
goes to  the  treatment facilities of the plant for the
full-scale treatment.
   Foam from the flocculation unit is fed to the burners
for incineration or is mixed  with the  sludge separated
from the total  effluent of the enterprise to  be  treated
jointly.
   Technical-economic evaluation of  the scheme con-
sidered has shown that the cost of the oil and emulsion
bearing effluent by physical-chemical methods is 60-70
copecks/m-'.
   Hyperfiltration as  one  of  the  methods may  be
recommended for the use at  the enterprises discharging
                                                  sludge-holding tank
                                         Pig.3  Scheme of emulsion breaking by separation
                                                     122

-------
small amounts of  emulsive effluents, in order of 1-5
m-'/day.
   Preliminary investigations show that at the initial oil
concentration  of 30-40 g/1 concentration up to 350 g/1
is reached without any decrease of membrane productiv-
ity; oil content in the treated water is 7-8 mg/1 at the
membrane  selectivity of  75-80% by sodium  chloride.
Further concentration may lead to a slip of contamina-
tions.
   Researches  on this method  to be used  for oil and
emulsion containing waste waters are still being carried
on.
   The choice of the method for emulsive waste water
treatment should be made in accordance with the local
conditions  of the  enterprise.  Here  the  ratio between
emulsive  effluent and the total effluent of the enterprise
should be  taken  into  consideration  as well as  the
properties  of  the  emulsions discharged and  also  the
presence  of free industrial areas.  The final scheme  of
treatment should be confirmed  by a technical-economic
calculation.
                                                     123

-------
                            ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FOR AN
                         ORGANIC  CHEMICALS  MANUFACTURING  COMPLEX

                            by
                            Anton C. Marek, Jr  - Chief Sanitary Engineer Organic
                            Chemicals Division
                            William Askins - Environmental Engineer Engineering
                            and Construction Division
ABSTRACT

The  Bound  Brook plant of the American Cyanamid
Company  manufactures  dyes,  chemical intermediates,
organic pigments, plastic additives, Pharmaceuticals, fine
chemicals, agricultural chemicals, elastomers and rubber
chemicals. The  plant's extremely complex wastewater
stream now receives primary and secondary treatment.
Because of State and Federal regulation and because of
the effluent's impact on the receiving water, American
Cyanamid is  designing an advanced wastewater treat-
ment system consisting of trimedia filtration and carbon
adsorption  to further  treat the Bound  Brook plant
effluent.  Alternative treatment  processes  were  con-
sidered in paper studies  and in laboratory bench  scale
studies and were  rejected. Both filtration and carbon
adsorption  processes  were tested in pilot studies, and
selected versions  of  both processes are  being further
evaluated  in  on-going prototype demonstrations. The
full  scale  system  is  currently  under  design,  and the
system will be fully operational in December 1977.
                                            ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

                                            The authors gratefully acknowledge Messrs. W. Allen, G.
                                            Apfel, N.A.  Kaye, H.R. Kemme, S.A. Leshaw, A.G.
                                            Potter, C.P. Priesing, F.B. Van Cor and D.R. Wilcox of
                                            American Cyanamid Company  for their  guidance and
                                            technical  support  throughout  this  project  and  the
                                            preparation of this paper.

                                            The authors also wish  to express their appreciation for
                                            the technical assistance provided by the Calgon Corpora-
                                            tion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;  Gulp Wesner Culp, El
                                            Dorado Hills,  California; E.I. Du Pont de  Nemours and
                                            Company, Wilmington,  Delaware; Envirotech Corpora-
                                            tion, Salt Lake City, Utah; ICI United States, Wilming-
                                            ton, Delaware; Metcalf & Eddy Inc., Boston, Massachu-
                                            setts; Neptune Microfloc, Inc., Corvallis, Oregon;Nichols
                                            Engineering and  Research Corporation, Belle Mead, New
                                            Jersey and Zurn Industries, Rochester, New York.
FIGURES

Figure No.
     1

     2
     3

     4
     5

     6
     7
      9
     10
Flow Diagram — Primary and
   Secondary Treatment Facilities
TOC Isotherm Plot
Flow Diagram - 5-In Diameter GAC
   Pilot Plant
TOC Breakthrough Curve
Flow Diagram - 30-In Diameter Pilot
   Column
TOC Removal - 30-In Diameter Column
Headloss Profile Without Coagulant
   Aid
Headloss Profile With Coagulant Aid
Cluster Filter Configuration
Flow Diagram — AWT Facilities
                                            TABLES
Table No.
   1
   2
Influent Wastewater Characteristics
Typical Removal Efficiencies in Bio-
  logical Treatment System
5-In Diameter GAC Pilot Plant -
  Dissolved Solids Data
5-In Diameter GAC Pilot Plant -
  Ammonia and Organic Nitrogen
  Data
Powdered Activated Carbon Pilot
  Studies I — Performance Summary

Powdered Activated Carbon Pilot
  Studies II - Performance Summary
Summary of Pilot Filter Media
                                                   124

-------
The  Bound Brook,  New  Jersey  plant  of American
Cynamid  Company  employs 2,200  persons  and pro-
duces  over  1,000 different products  including dyes,
chemical intermediates,  organic pigments, plastic addi-
tives, Pharmaceuticals, fine chemicals, agricultural chem-
icals, elastomers  and rubber chemicals.  The multiple
waste  discharges  from  the  production operations are
combined with cooling water, sanitary sewage and storm
water  runoff  from  the  plant area  to form a  single
effluent stream that is  processed in an existing waste
treatment facility. Typical ranges of biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), color
and total organic  carbon (TOC) in the raw waste stream
are shown in Table 1.

                    TABLE 1
          Influent Wastewater Characteristics
Parameter

BOD
COD
TOC
Color
Concentration Range

270-400 mg/1
1,000-1,400 mg/1
260-350 mg/1
400-600 CDAPHA units
Wastewater treatment has  been a major part  of the
Bound Brook operation for over 30 years. As wastewater
technology has progressed with time, the  Bound Brook
Plant  has  made  significant improvements to its waste-
water treatment facilities. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram
of the existing facilities.  In the late  1930's, a primary
treatment  plant was installed at a cost of $500,000. This
plant included  a  19 million gallon (7.2  x 10^ cu m)
equalization basin, a lime neutralization facility with a
capacity  to  neutralize  an equivalent of 30 tons (27.2
metric tons) of sulfuric  acid a day, and a 60 million
gallon (2.3 x 10^ cu m) primary settling lagoon.
   Beginning in 1949, extensive  laboratory and pilot
plant studies were initiated to procure  desing data for
the construction of an activated sludge treatment plant.
This facility was built in 1957 at  a cost of $4,500,000
and placed into operation in 1958. The secondary waste
treatment facilities  consist of six  aeration basins, each
having a capacity of 3-1/3 million  gallons (1.3 x 10^ cu
m),  six  secondary  clarifiers, and a chlorine  contact
chamber. In addition to treating its industrial waste, the
Bound Brook plant  provides secondary treatment for up
to 5 mgd (1.9 x 10^ cu m/day) a day of primary treated
waste from  a regional municipal wastewater treatment
authority  serving  the  region surrounding the  Bound
Brook plant. Our contract with the Authority will expire
in 1977,  and their wastewaters  will not be included in
our advanced wastewater treatment system.


Our  present  waste  treatment  facilities provide better
than a 90%  reduction in the BOD loading and approxi-
mately a 65%  reduction  in TOC  and COD.  The color
bodies present  in  our  raw wastes are  resistant to
biodegradation  and as  a  result, little color is removed
through our existing facilities. Table  2  summarizes  the
BOD, COD and  TOC removals obtained in our treatment
facilities.
                                                    FIGURE 1
                           WASTE  TREATMENT PLANT FLOW DIAGRAM
             PLANT SEWERS          AMERICAN  CYANAMID COMPANY
                                    BOUND BROOK, NEW JERSEY
                                            AERATION BASINS
                INFLUENT
                PUMPS

SOMERSET
RAHITAN VALLEY
SEWERAGE
AUTHORITY
«— CHLORINE
(bfb
AIR BLOWERS
3 	 *
J >
3 	 "
) \
;

"a
* ^
o
1 ^
4
O
'O
4
"o:

2
J
f



i
i
i
i

,Q.
* t=
O
¥
o
o,
.t
i «
o

4
i
t

•

T
1
1
1

6*
* *
o
a s
,f,
0
'a
t
o,

6
J
f






1
1
CLARIFIERS
/~6^\

1



y-i '
/ '/T\ .

/ ^ •
1 ' /^l\
I (Oil
n x_y
" /X^A
11 ' / /^r\
r-Hlf®-
MM /^
i, H IK' /T\
"II 1 1 x
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III
1 1 1 IJ. 1 1 1 ». w
t "Hill '
1 1 1 1 1

CHLORINE
CONTACT
.'CHAMBER
O>TO RIVER
ASTE SLUDGE
PPPCOP RETURN
rrTTTT SVUDGE
RETURN SLUDGE 	 TT f { ( PUMPS
                                                    125

-------
                       TABLE 2

              Typical Removal Efficiencies in
              Biological Treatment System
 Parameter

 BOD
 COD
 TOC
9 Removal

 90-95
 55-70
 60-70
Unfortunately, many of the organic compounds present
in our raw wastewater are resistant to biodegradation,
and significant quantities of nonbiodegradable organics
are present in our secondary effluent. In 1971 it became
evident  that  additional treatment  would be required,
particularly  for  color, odor, toxicity and suspended
solids.

For an understanding of the problem one must consider
the relationship  between the Bound Brook plant dis-
charge and the flow in the receiving stream, the Raritan
River.  The  Raritan River  has an  average  flow  of
approximately 1 billion gallons  per day (3.8 x 10^  cu
m/day) at the location of the Bound  Brook discharge.
Seasonal  variations, however, can be  significant. Mini-
mum low flow is maintained at 90 million gallons per
day (3.4 x 10-*  cu m/day) by release of water form  an
upstream  reservoir. Under  these low flow conditions
which  occur  sporadically  throughout the  year, the
Bound Brook plant effluent  makes up approximately
25% of the river flow.

Two alternatives were  considered  for upgrading the
Bound Brook plant effluent. They  were:  1) heavier
emphasis  on at-source  treatment  or  control in the
manufacturing areas and, 2) additional end-of-pipe treat-
ment  (advanced wastewater treatment) to  supplement
biological treatment. Consideration was given to a study
program to isolate and treat concentrated waste streams
containing refractory organics within the manufacturing
area. However, manpower requirements and costs for
individual waste treatment facilities scattered through-
out the plant would have been excessive. The constantly
changing  product mix, and the possibility of process
upsets and spills during transportation of raw materials
from building to building, contributed  to the doubt that
this effort would be worthwhile. It would have been
extremely difficult  to  predict the  effects  of removing
components from the  main waste stream,  particularly
what new toxicants might be created by the admixture
of waste streams that in themselves are nontoxic. As a
result, it was decided to proceed with further investiga-
tion of advanced wastewater treatment  techniques.

Preliminary  literature reviews and  bench scale  studies
were conducted  to evaluate activated carbon adsorption,
high lime treatment and ozonation. High lime treatment
produced  no significant reductions in either color  or
organic matter. Ozone requirements to reduce the color
and refractory levels to those achievable with activated
carbon were impractical. Capital and operating cost for
an  ozonation  plant were  well beyond that for  an
activated  carbon  treatment facility.  However, carbon
isotherms  conducted during  the  preliminary develop-
ment  work indicated that  carbon would substantially
reduce color, foam and refractory organics.

Since  our preliminary isotherms  were conducted  in
1971, we  have  run approximately 100 additional iso-
therms on samples of our final effluent. Figure 2 shows
the extreme variation in adsorption  capacity of  virgin
carbon that is experienced with  our particular waste-
water.

Both  granular and  powdered activated carbons  were
investigated  in  pilot  plant  studies  to  evaluate  the
feasibility  of their use  of improving  the Bound Brook
effluent. Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption
studies were conducted in pilot units consisting of four 6
ft  x 5 in  inside  diameter (1.8 m  x 12.7 cm) columns
mounted on steel frames and piped with 1/2 in (1.3 cm)
polyethylene  tubing. The  use of polyethylene tubing
                   TOTAL  ORGANIC CARBON

                              ISOTHERMS
              00
              QC
                  0 40
              O
              Q  0 20
              LU
              O
    o 10

    0 03

    0 06
              DC
              (rj  0 04

              O
              o
              I—  0 02
              C/3
                                      40    60   80 100
                                                          200
                       TOTAL ORGANIC  CARBON mg/l
                                                   126

-------
provided the flexibility for connecting the columns for
either parallel or series operation  as a particular test
required. Figure  3 is a flow diagram  of our GAC pilot
system which was used for most of these studies. A side
stream  of  clarified effluent  taken from  one of our
existing  clarifiers was pumped to a temporary storage
drum and  thence  to the pilot  columns. One  set of
columns was  piped for parallel operation and packed
with filtration media  to  prefilter the effluent for test
Runs 2,  3 and 4. The second set of columns was packed
with granular  carbon and  piped for either  series or
parallel  operation depending on the test program. The
adsorption  data obtained from these  studies were used
to develop  the process design for our  full scale granular
activated carbon  facilities.  During each  of  the  runs,
samples   of effluent to  the  pilot plant  system  and
effluent  from each column were analyzed daily for TOC,
COD, color and suspended solids.

Runs 1   and   2  were  conducted for the purpose of
obtaining breakthrough data for TOC, COD and color.
For  these runs, the  5-in (12.7 cm)  diameter pilot plant
was operated in a downflow packed bed mode with the
four adsorption columns piped in series. For Run 1, the
adsorption  columns were fed unfiltered clarified effluent
and  were operated  at  a hydraulic loading rate  of  1.9
gpm/sq  ft (77.3  1/min/sq m). For  Run 2, the influent
was prefiltered through a mixed media of coal, sand and
garnet before  being fed to the adsorption columns. The
flow rate for Run 2 was 3.4 gpm/sq ft (138 1/min/sq m).
Figure 4 shows the breakthrough curve for TOC develop-
ed for Run 2.
In  addition  to the routine TOC, COD,  color  and
suspended solids analyses, special samples from Run 1
were analyzed for dissolved solids, ammonia and organic
nitrogen. Based on 20 analyses performed throughout
Run 1,  the average reduction in total  dissolved solids
through the adsorption columns was only 3%. Ammonia
and organic nitrogen analyses were performed during the
first 16 days of operation. During this period there was
no  observed reduction in the ammonia nitrogen  con-
centration,  however, there was an observed 85% reduc-
tion in the  organic nitrogen concentration. Tables 3 and
4 summarize the dissolved solids, ammonia and organic
nitrogen data collected through Run 1.

Exhaused carbon  from Runs 1 and 2  was sent to an
outside laboratory for regeneration studies and reused in
succeeding  runs.  Run  3 was  conducted  to obtain
adsorption  data using a downflow  moving bed system
with regenerated  carbon. The  feed for this run  was
prefiltered.  In the  run, all four columns were initially
charged   with  approximately 4  ft (1.2 m)  of virgin
activated carbon.  As  the  carbon in  the  lead  column
became exhaused, the column was removed from service,
repacked with regenerated carbon from Run 1 plus a 5%
virgin makeup and placed back on stream at the end of
the four column series.
              5" DIAMETER GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON PILOT PLANT
                                                                             BACKWASH
                                                                          *"    OUTLET
                                                                             FILTRATION
                                                                               MEDIA
                                                                                GRANULAR
                                                                              ACTIVATED CARBON
                                                                                APPROX  1 0'
                                                   127

-------
              BREAKTHROUGH CURVE for TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
                             RUN 2 -  5" DIAMETER COLUMNS
                 90
                 80
             O
             CD
             DC

             O
O
o
_i
<
»-
o
                 30
                                       10
                                                                                 30
                                            TIME - DAYS
As part of our regeneration program, the efficiency of
the regenerated carbon compared to virgin carbon was
evaluated in order to  establish design parameters for a
full scale regeneration  facility. Based on the information

                       TABLE 3
               5-In Diameter GAC Pilot Plant -
                  Dissolved Solids Data
                                      Effluent
                                   Concentration
                                        mg/1

                                      2,843
                                      2,176
                                      2,578
                                      3,802
                                      2,427
                                      2,668
                                      1,863
                                      2,210
                                      2,019
                                      2,017
                                      2,394
                                      2,268
                                      2,524
                                      2,718
                                      2,172
                                      2,341
                                      1,876
                                      2,413
                                      2,470
                                      2,300
                                      2,354 mg/1
                 Average Reduction = 3%
Cumulative Flow


248
5,638
11,115
11,886
13,050
13,807
14,374
14,764
15,567
16,007
18,233
21,237
22,765
23,594
24,344
25,459
25,852
26,616
27,780
28,160
Average Concentration
Influent
Concentration
mg/1
3,002
2,268
2,689
2,913
2,511
2,777
1,942
2,236
2,059
2,068
2,467
2,380
2,529
2,752
2,238
2,361
1,870
2,449
2,595
2,335
2,422 mg/1
                                        available in the literature at the time,  we expected
                                        adsorption activity losses in the range of  10-15% based
                                        on one  regeneration cycle. Comparisons of the  once
                                        regenerated carbon with virgin carbon using the adsorp-
                                        tion isotherms, indicated that activity losses in the range
                                        of 30-50% were being experienced. As a result, our pilot
                                        plant  program was  extended in  order to conduct
                                                           TABLE 4
                                                                               Organic
                                                                          Nitrogen Concentration
                                                                                      3

                                                                                      3

                                                                                      1

                                                                                      1

                                                                                      1

                                                                                      3

                                                                                      2

                                                                                      3

                                                                                      2

                                                                                      1

                                                                                      1

                                                                                      1

                                                                                      t^

                                                                                      2 mg/1
Cumulative Flo'
Gal
641
1.421
1,829
2,209
2,389
2,976
3.353
4,107
4,487
4,861
5,251
5,d38
6,038
Average
5-In Diameter GAC Pilot Plant -
Ammonia and Organic Nitrogen Data
Ammonia
Nitrogen Concentration
rf Influent Effluent
34 33
34 33
27 27
28 28
34 33
41 39
45 42
42 40
51 54
58 56
49 49
45 44
44 43_
41 mg/1 40 mg/1
                                                 128

-------
additional  column  studies during which different  car-
bons  and  regeneration conditions were evaluated for
adsorption capacity through multiple regenerations. For
these tests, the pilot  columns were piped in parallel so
that each column was fed the same wastewater. In each
of the four exhaustion runs  one column was used  as a
control and was  packed  with virgin  carbon; a second
column contained carbon that  had been acid washed
prior   to  regeneration  using  1.5% hydrochloric  acid
solution; a third column  contained regenerated carbon
from  the previous  run without pretreatment; and the
fourth column contained a competitive carbon which
was being used  for comparative purposes. Based on a
comparison of adsorption capacities  for  total organic
carbon after three cycles  of regeneration, a  carbon  was
found that could  be  regenerated  to approximately
75-80% of its  virgin adsorption capacity while keeping
its physical losses to within 7%.

The  use  of powdered  activated carbon to upgrade  the
Bound Brook  plant effluent  was also evaluated  during
two separate pilot plant studies. Both  studies employed
a process in which the controlled addition of powdered
activated carbon (PAC) to aeration chambers in acti-
vated  sludge   units was  evaluated. The  studies  were
conducted  using  the  Bound Brook  primary  treated
effluent as feed to the activated sludge systems.

A preliminary  PAC  study was conducted during the first
quarter of  1973. For this  study the beneficial effects of
adding low dosages  of powdered activated carbon to our
activated  sludge system were  investigated  on a pilot
scale.  At the  time of this evaluation, there were no
proven  techniques  to  separate  exhausted powdered
activated carbon from the  biological sludge to regenerate
it for reuse. The investigation, therefore, was based on
the addition of powdered activated carbon on a throw-
away  basis. For this study two  115-gallon (0.44 cu m)
capacity activated sludge systems were established. Both
units were operated to simulate the existing activated
sludge plant without the addition of the primary treated
waste  from the  Somerset-Raritan  Valley  Sewage Au-
thority.

The pilot plants were operated as plug flow units with a
20-hour detention time, a 30% return sludge ratio and a
mixed liquor  suspended  solids  concentration ranging
from 3,500-5,500 mg/1. Following the initial start-up,
the  units were  allowed  to  run  for 22 days to  reach
steady state  conditions and  a stable BOD  removal
efficiency.

Four separate dosage  levels; 42 mg/1, 84 mg/1, 126
mg/1 and 168 mg/1; of powdered activated carbon were
evaluated in  the  pilot  units. The  second  unit was
operated  as a control throughout  the  study. Table 5
summarizes the results of this 3-month study. In general,
there were no  significant reductions in the TOC or COD
levels in  the effluent of the powdered activated carbon
system even at  dosage  rates of 168 mg of  powdered
carbon per liter  of influent waste.  The most significant
improvement  was in  the color  removal at the  168 mg/1
dosage level. The color removal efficiency was increased
to 33% compared to a 7% level for  the control unit. The
residual color, however,  averaged  331  CDAPHA units
and was still readily noticeable. It was obvious from this
preliminary  investigation  that  much  greater carbon
dosage rates would be necessary in order to  produce a
powdered activated carbon system  effluent that would
be comparable to that achieved  with granular activated
carbon.

The  second PAC process  investigation was initiated  in
January 1974. At that time, powdered activated carbon
had  been  successfully  regenerated  using  a  modified
transport  reactor. As a result of this work,  the addition
                                                 TABLE 5
                          Powdered Activated Carbon Pilot Studies I - Performance Summary
Activated
Sludge Unit

Control
PAC 4 2 mg/1

Control
PAC 84 mg/1

Control
PAC126mg/l

Control
PAC 168 mg/1
BOD
Influent
mg/1
263

350

333

312

Effluent
mg/1
19
25
12
20
24
13
9
9
Removal
%
93
90
97
94
93
96
97
97
TOC
Influent
mg/1
205

280

254

263

Effluent
mg/1
77
77
73
84
81
73
70
60
Removal
%
62
62
74
70
68
71
73
77
                                                                                         COLOR
Influent
CDAPHA

414
                      452
                      417
                      491
Effluent
CDAPHA

430
399

398
332

450
341

459
331
                                            Removal
(4)
 4

12
27

(8)
18

 7
33
PAC = Powdered Activated Carbon
                                                     129

-------
of powdered activated carbon to the existing activated
sludge  plant at dosage rates in excess  of 200 mg/1
became attractive. The purpose of this second study was
to  determine the  powdered activated  carbon dosage
requirements necessary to produce an effluent of similar
quality to that  obtained with granular activated carbon.

This study was conducted using four completely mixed
biounits.  Each unit consisted  of a 6.3-liter  aeration
chamber and a 4-liter gravity clarifier  section. Return
sludge  was  drawn  automatically  from  the  clarifier
bottoms into the aeration chambers. One biounit was set
up as a control, and the other three were run at various
powdered activated carbon feed concentrations. All four
units were operated with an  average detention time of
14 hours and a sludge age ranging from 10-14 days.

Powdered activated carbon feed rates ranging from  340
to  990 mg/1  of  carbon were investigated.  Table  6
summarizes  the results of this study. It was concluded
that the  powdered  activated  carbon   process would
require exorbitant carbon dosages in order to produce a
final effluent with low  color and TOC. It was further
concluded that these  dosage  requirements were neither
economical nor practical.

Data generated in  the 5-in (12.7 cm) diameter column
studies  and the PAC studies were  ultimately  used to
evaluate 17 possible  alternative processes for upgrading
the  Bound  Brook system.   These  processes  included
granular  systems,  powdered  activated  carbon  systems
and combined powdered/granular activated carbon sys-
tems. The  most attractive   process from a technical
standpoint and a  capital and  operating cost  was the
upflow, expanded, pulse-bed design.

To  further test this design  a larger granular activated
carbon prototype was installed in 1974. Figure 5 shows
the flow diagram of the 30-in (76.2 cm) diameter pilot
system. The carbon  column is 30-in (76.2   cm) in
diameter x 35 ft (10.7 m) on the straight side with a 60°
cone bottom and is  constructed of fiber glass. Filtered
wastewater is pumped into the bottom of the column
                                          through five  1-in (2.5  cm) diameter nozzles located in
                                          the cone section. The  feedwater passes up through the
                                          bed  at a  hydraulic flow  rate  of 8  gpm/sq ft (326
                                          1/min/sq  m). Each  day a pulse of exhausted  carbon
                                          ranging from 2.5 to  5%, depending on  the organic
                                          loading, is removed  from  the bottom  of  the column,
                                          while an equivalent amount of fresh carbon is  added to
                                          the top of the bed.

                                          Currently,  the  column is only being pulsed at  a 2.5%
                                          rate.  The bed  depth of the column is maintained at
                                          approximately  30  ft  (9.2 m),  thereby  providing  a
                                          detention  time  of approximately 30 minutes. Presently,
                                          the column is being pulsed  using virgin carbon; however,
                                          by the end of the year, we will begin using regenerated
                                          carbon for pulsing. Our test program is designed to run
                                          through five  complete cycles  of regeneration  with the
                                          carbon now being exhausted. Our  purpose  is to  further
                                          optimize  the regeneration conditions  for our  spent
                                          carbon and to  better define the adsorption capacity of
                                          the carbon after several regenerations.

                                          Exhausted carbon from this column is being regenerated
                                          in a 3-ft (0.92 m) diameter x 6-hearth multiple hearth
                                          pilot   furnace.  Figure  6  shows  recent influent  and
                                          effluent TOC concentrations to the column based on a
                                          2.5% pulse. The TOC  removal through the column for
                                          this period averaged 68%.

                                          Initially it was planned to operate the advanced waste-
                                          water  treatment system without filtration of the waste-
                                          water, and it was believed that the upflow expanded bed
                                          could  accommodate  the  range  of  suspended  solids
                                          loading anticipated from the  secondary treatment  sys-
                                          tem.  However,  two  factors  caused us to  include  a
                                          filtration system  in our  design:  1) stringent limitations
                                          placed by the EPA on  our  effluent suspended solids and
                                          2)  poor operating experience  in our  prototype  carbon
                                          studies caused in part by high suspended solids levels in
                                          the secondary effluent.

                                          The EPA imposed a suspended solid limitation  of our
                                          wastewater  discharge  of 1,950 pounds per day (885
                                                 TABLE 6
                         Powdered Activated Carbon  Pilot Studies II - Performance Summary
                         BOD
Activated
Sludge Unit

Control
PAC 340 mg/1
PAC 580 mg/1

Control
PAC 7 90 mg/1
PAC 990 mg/1
Influent
 mg/1

366
396
Effluent
 mg/1

21
32
28

10
                                   Removal
94
91
92

97
98
98
        Influent
         mg/1

        261
267
TOC
Effluent
mg/1
114
97
76
101
34
33
Removal
%
54
63
71
62
87
88
                                                                                        COLOR
                                Influent
                                CDAPHA

                                502
                                                                435
Effluent
CDAPHA

515
150
 94

465
 73
 67
                                                                                                    Removal
(3)
70
81

(7)
83
85
                                                    130

-------
                30"  DIAMETER  GAG PILOT PLANT SYSTEM
                 CLAHIFIER
                  SUMP
kg/day) daily average and 3,440 pounds per day (1,560
kg/day) daily maximum, which equates to 12 mg/1 daily
average and 21 mg/1 daily maximum at a design flow of
20 mgd (7.6 x  10^ cu m/day). Even with greatly
improved control of the solids concentration in our
aeration basins, we anticipate an average concentration
of approximately  30 mg/1 suspended  solids in the
                  secondary  effluent.  Therefore, it  was necessary  to
                  include filtration of effluent in our design.

                  The second factor was not anticipated and manifested
                  itself  only after the carbon prototype had been in
                  operation for 5 days. Without warning, 13 ft (4.0 m) of
                  the 28 ft (8.5 m) of carbon in the column was carried
                         TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON  REMOVAL
                        30" DIAMETER PILOT CARBON COLUMN
              2
              o
              m
              cc
              <
              o
              o
              2~
              <; D>
              SE
              cc
              O
                         PULSE CONDITIONS:
                           VIRGIN CARBON
                           2.5% per day
                         FLOW RATE:
                           8 gpm/ft2
INFLUENT
                              EFFLUENT
	 . 	 ^ 	 	 	 . 	 — ^X-
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 5

10 15 20 25 30
TIME - DAYS
                                             131

-------
out of the column  by the effluent flow. This phenom-
enon  occurred  two more times  during the initial runs
without effluent filtration. It was postulated that solids
accumulation in the lower portions of the carbon bed
and the  possible buildup of gas bubbles in  the bed
contributed to  these carbon carry-overs. It was decided
that  the  expense of wastewater  filtration was  justified
because large carbon  losses  of the type just described
would be intolerable in the full scale system. Therefore,
independent of the regulatory  considerations, it was
decided to include a wastewater filtration system in our
design and to  place the system  ahead of the carbon
columns.

To determine the type of filtration system that will yield
the best  results at the least cost,  three small  pilot
columns,  an  upflow  prototype   column  and  a larger
prototype  downflow  column  were  utilized. The pilot
columns  were  used primarily to select  the  type of
filter  media for use in a downflow configuration. The
prototype filters were used to decide between an upflow
and downflow  configuration and to  determine  design
parameters, utilizing the media type selected in  the pilot
columns.

The  pilot  columns were leased from  a filter  media
supplier and consisted of 4-1/2 in (11.4 cm) diameter
clear plastic columns with connections for operation in a
downflow  configuration  and for  backwashing  with
                    water. Three  types  of dual  media and  three types of
                    trimedia were  tested. The dual media consisted of a base
                    layer of  sand and a  top  layer of coal. The trimedia
                    consisted of a bottom layer of garnet, a middle layer of
                    sand, and a top layer of coal.  Table 7 shows the grain
                    size ranges of the sand and coal in the  three types of
                    dual media and the grain size ranges of the garnet, sand
                    and coal in the three types of trimedia.

                    It  was  determined  that trimedia Type  C yielded the
                    highest  removal of suspended solids within an acceptable
                    range of head loss. Not that this filtration media has a
                    higher percentage of fine garnet than the other  media
                    tested,  and closely  resembles media  typically used in
                    water treatment.  Examination of the suspended solids in
                    the  secondary effluent shows  that  the particles are
                    smaller  than those in a "typical" secondary effluent and
                    that they lie within a very narrow range of particle sizes.
                    This examination gives strength to the decision for small
                    grain size filter media.

                    The upflow prototype unit consisted of a  16-in (40.6
                    cm) diameter  column filled with 6 ft (1.8 m) of graded
                    media ranging from coarse  gravel to fine  sand. Suspend-
                    ed solids  removal  efficiency,  headloss buildup  and
                    breakthrough  were determined both with and without
                    coagulant aid. It was determined that the unit could be
                    operated at rates  up to 10  gpm/sq ft (407 1/min/sqm),
                    but  that  breakthrough occurred without warning  and
                                                      TABLE 7
                                            Summary of Pilot Filter Media
                       Type
Component   Depth, In
           Effective Size,    Uniformity
               mm        Coefficient
                     Dual Media A


                     Dual Media B


                     Dual Media C


                     Trimedia A



                     Trimedia B




                     Trimedia C
Coal
Sand

Coal
Sand

Coal
Sand

Coal
Sand
Garnet

Coal
Coal
Sand
Garnet

Coal
Sand
Garnet
24
10

24
10

24
12

24
 9
 3

16
 8
 9
 3

16
14
 6
   1.2
   0.5

   1.4
   0.5

1.2-1.4
0.6-0.7

   1.0
   0.45
   0.2

   2.0
   1.0
   0.45
   0.2

   1.0
   0.45
   0.2
1.3
1.3

1.3
1.3

1.6
1.7

1.5
1.5
1.5

1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

1.5
1.5
1.5
                                                    132

-------
that  the  filter could not  be backwashed sufficiently
without expenditure of excessive amounts of energy and
time.  It was also  determined that a  gravity downflow
configuration was more economical to install.

The large prototype downflow  filter  is 4 ft (1.2 m) in
diameter  and  is 35  ft (10.7  m) high.  The filter is
provided  with  instrumentation to measure  flow  rate
through the filter, headloss  across  the filter, differential
pressure drop across 2-3A in (7  cm) increments of bed
depth and backwash flow rate.

Tests were run  to determine optimal feed rate, suspend-
ed solids  removal efficiency, headloss  buildup,  break-
through and backwash water characters!tics. In addition,
profiles of pressure drop through the bed were drawn to
determine how much of the filter bed was being utilized
and whether there  was excessive headloss across  the
media  interfaces.  It was found that suspended solids
removal efficiency varied from 64 to  84% at suspended
solids  feed concentrations varying  from 16 to 37 mg/1.
Headloss  buildup was extremely slow with some filter
runs exceeding 24 hours  before the filter  was  back-
washed. The filter was operated successfully at rates up
to 8 gpm/sq ft (326  1/min/sq m).  Figure 7 shows a
typical headloss profile through the filter  bed with no
coagulant  aid  used. Note  the peaks  occurring at the
media  interface  locations, indicating that substantial
quantities of solids are being trapped at these interfaces.
Figure  8 shows a typical headloss profile through the
bed when a coagulant aid was used. Note that although
solids removal  efficiency remains high, the solids built
up  at  the  surface of the  filter, and filter  runs were
drastically shortened.

It was decided from the results of the prototype studies
that  a  downflow filter packed with trimedia would be
used. Air backwash will be  employed to ensure that the
suspended solids trapped in the lower portions of the
bed  will be  removed. The  backwash  cycle will  be
initiated by headloss buildup rather than solids break-
through.

The  results of all the paper  studies, pilot tests and
            HEADLOSS PROFILE
                  WITHOUT
              COAGULANT AID

           4' DIAMETER PILOT FILTER
                                        COAL
                  FLOW RATE: 6 gpm/sq. It.
                  TPI-MEDIA TYPE C
                                         SAND
                                         GARNET*
          2     4    6    8    10   12    14

            INCREMENTAL HEADLOSS

               INCHES PER 2.75" of

                FILTRATION MEDIA
          HEADLOSS PROFILE WITH
                COAGULANT AID

             4'  DIAMETER PILOT FILTER
  LU
  I
  o
                                                         X  20
                                                         1-
                                                         Q.
                                                         LU
                                                         Q
                                                         Q
                                                         LU
                                                         CD
                                                                       FLOW RATE 6 gpm/sq ft.
                                                                       TRI-MEDIA  TYPE C
                                                                                               COAL
                                         SAND
                                                                                               GARNET
       02    6    10    14    18    22    26    30

              INCREMENTAL HEADLOSS

                INCHES PER 2.75" of

                 FILTRATION MEDIA
                                                  133

-------
prototype  studies  were analyzed to  determine design
parameters for the full scale plant. The trimedia filters
are designed for a hydraulic loading of 5 gpm/sq ft (204
1/min/sq  m) with one filter  cell out  of service  for
backwashing. The backwash cycle will consist of drawing
down of the liquid level in the cell being back washed to
within 6 in (15.2 cm) of the media surface, air scouring
at a rate of 3-5 cfm/sq ft (0.9-1.5 cu m/min/sq m) for 5
minutes,  air scouring at the  same  rate  plus water
backwashing  at  a rate  of 3-5  gpm/sq  ft  (122-204
1/min/sq m)  for 2-3 minutes, water backwashing alone
at a rate of 15 gpm/sq ft (611  1/min/sq m) for up to 10
minutes, and gradually shutting off the backwash water
over a period of 4 minutes in order to reclassify the filter
media.

The  physical configuration of the filters is shown in
Figure 9, and is known as a cluster  filter design. The
actual filter will consist of two of these clusters with the
flow  split between  them. Each cell of the cluster acts as
an individual filter and can be isolated  from the other
seven cells. Each cell will be 22 x 23 ft (6.7 x 7.0 m),
and will contain approximately 900 nozzles set at 9-in
(22.9 cm) centers in a  false bottom. Liquid flows into a
splitter box located above the center column and divides
evenly  among the four  cells  in the  cluster. Flow
continues by gravity through the media and nozzles into
a false bottom, then discharges into an effluent channel,
and drops over a weir into a sump. When backwash is
initiated by  a high water level  above the media,  the
water is drawn down through a siphon.  Air is pumped
into  the false bottom, and is distributed evenly among
the nozzles during the air scour. A water  backwash is
then initiated with water distributing evenly among the
nozzles to complete the backwash cycle.

The carbon columns are designed for a hydraulic loading
of 8 gpm/sq ft (326 1/mm/sq m) with 5% of the carbon
bed volume being pulsed  each day on the average. The
physical configuration of the columns consists of ten
16-ft (4.9  m) diameter x 40-ft  (12.2 m) straight side
columns with 45°  cone bottoms. The ten columns will
be piped in parallel and will be charged with 30 ft (9.2
m)  of  carbon. Waste water will  be introduced  to  the
bottom  of each  column  through eight  inlet ports
projecting into the cone bottom. At the design hydraulic
loading  of 8  gpm/sq ft  (326  1/min/sq m), a linear
velocity of approximately  1 ft/min (0.31 m/min) will be
      DOWNFLOW  CLUSTER  FILTER
                                     Courtesy of General  Filter Company
                                                134

-------
experienced,  and a  contact  time of  30 minutes will
result.  The carbon bed is not restrained vertically, and
operates as an upflow expanded bed. A unique feature
of this design  is that  spent  carbon  can  be removed
simultaneously with  the  addition of fresh carbon with-
out altering the flow rate through the column. The pulse
design  allows operation of the columns in a manner that
approximates countercurrent movement of the waste-
water and carbon, thereby providing efficient utilization
of the carbon.

Figure 10  shows the general arrangement  of the com-
ponents of the advanced wastewater treatment system,
including  the  carbon  transport  system  and carbon
regeneration  system.  A spent pulse  of carbon will  be
transferred as a slurry to a spent carbon storage tank and
then to a dewatering screw. The dewatering screw will
permit the carbon  to   drain  to  approximately  50%
moisture before it is fed  into the 26-ft  (7.9 m) diameter
multiple  hearth  furnace for  regeneration. The  spent
carbon will  be  regenerated  thermally  in a closely
controlled  atmosphere and temperature profile with a
maximum   temperature   of  approximately  1,750°F
(954°C). Steam  will be injected into the furnace  to
enhance  the reactivation step. Following regeneration,
the  carbon will  be  water  quenched  to reduce  the
temperature to below 100°F (38°C). From the quench
tank, the  carbon will be transferred to the regenerated
carbon storage tank for reuse in the system.

Under  average  loading  conditions,   approximately
100,000 pounds (45,400 kg) of carbon per day will be
regenerated. Carbon attrition losses are estimated to be
7% per cycle, so that an estimated 7,000 pounds (3,180
kg)  of  virgin  carbon  will  have to be  added daily to
maintain the carbon inventory. The total carbon inven-
tory in  the system will be 2.5 million  pounds (1.14 x
106kg).

Construction of  the  advanced wastewater  treatment
facilities and a waste activated sludge  disposal plant will
begin in the first quarter 1976.

Mechanical completion is scheduled for June  1977 with
standard operation in December 1977. The capital cost
for these  facilities is estimated to be  $22.4 million and
will bring the total capital investment for water pollu-
tion control for  the Bound  Brook  plant to over  $35
million.  Operating cost  for  water   pollution  control
facilities will exceed $8 million per year.
                                                   FIGURE 10
                                                 AWT
                                                          CARBON SLURRY
                                                                                              TREATED WATER


                                                                                              TO CHLOR1NATION


                                                                                         ADSORBERS
                                                     135

-------
                                  Cost Benefits of Physical Chemical Treatment
                                   by Frank P. Sebastian Senior Vice President
                                   Envirotech Corporation
The Clean Water Act of 1972 established a national goal
and a national policy  for the United States. So far as
industrial water pollution control is concerned, it estab-
lished  a timetable of  1977  for  the  best  practicable
control  technology, and  1983  for  the best available
control technology.

In the  municipal  sector,  the  1977 timetable  is for
secondary treatment,  with  water reclamation and reuse
factors to be considered after June 30, 1974,  and by
1983 the best practicable technology.

In  summary, the  Act  calls  for clean  streams  for
swimming, recreation, and the safety of fish and wildlife,
by  1985, with full consideration for reclamation  and
reuse possibilities for projects after mid-1974.

The technology  exists today to more than meet all the
municipal wastewater requirements. Accordingly, guide-
lines  have been issued for  most industrial  effluent
categories.  Any list  of examples of advanced waste
treatment that might be utilized to bring the nation to
the fruition of its water pollution control goals would
include  Tahoe, Colorado   Springs and Windhoek as
instances  of existing  plants,  as well as Occoquan in
Washington, D.C.;  Garland, Texas, and numerous others,
as examples  of advanced treatment plants under design
and construction in the U.S. Overall there are some 113
plants  under  design  or  construction  utilizing  various
aspects of advanced waste  treatment  to meet the 1977
goals previously established under the 1972 Act.

Let's  take a  closeup  look  at  Colorado Springs as an
example of upgradability of present biological technol-
ogy,  flexibility for  the  future  utilization  of more
advanced technology,  and water reclamation and reuse.
Colorado  Springs was an overloaded 30-million gallon a
day primary secondary treatment plant to which more
biological treatment was added. The Colorado  Springs
facility has also incorporated a two-million gallon a day
tertiary treatment  system  utilizing lime and  granular
carbon.

The lime is  added to a Reactor-Clarifier, the effluent
from which passes through a multi-media filter and then
on  through a battery  of granular carbon columns. The
lime sludge removed  from the bottom of  the Reactor-
Clarifier  tank is recalcined in  a multiple hearth  furnace
for reuse.  In the  same way, the spent carbon, after
having removed soluble organic material, trace pesticides
and refractory organics from the effluent, is regenerated
on site with losses as low as 3% and averaging only 5-7%.

The resulting product from the Colorado  Springs Water
Reclamation plant is a good indication of the potential
payoff that can result from the nation's newly adopted
water pollution goals. The reclaimed water was planned
to be  piped to  an electric  power  station for use as
cooling water makeup. The reclaimed water is valued at
26
-------
step in the process is to separate the liquids and solids by
the use of gravity and lime. This is done in a two-stage
process involving sedimentation  equipment such as a
Reactor-Qarifier. The lime is  mixed with raw influent,
not secondary effluent, as it enters the Reactor-Clarifier.
The lime facilitates  the settling of the solid material and
the clarification  of the effluent. It also  renders the
phosphates insoluble which promotes settling. The car-
bon dioxide,  shown  entering this  basin,  is used to
neutralize the  water  after it has been  made highly
alkaline through the addition  of lime. The  CC>2 source
will be explained later.  The output of this separation
step consists of chemically clarified  water, which  is
shown coming off to the top right; and the settled solids,
that is, sludge and lime, which are shown coming down
from the bottom of the basin. The lime that was used in
the Reactor-Clarifier is reclaimed in a multiple hearth
furnace reclamation process which produces the needed
CC>2 as a product of the stack gas. Thus,  the furnace
stack  gas, which approaches  zero air  pollution levels,
provides  the  carbon dioxide,  which is shown as it  is
bubbled  back through the water to  neutralize  it, as
mentioned earlier.

The principle product  of  the  multiple hearth  lime
reclaiming furnace, which  is  called a  Plural Purpose
Furnace, and on  which Envirotech has process patents, is
the reclaimed lime,  which combined with makeup lime,
is recycled in the process. In this step the insoluble DDT,
PCB, and indeed all the chlorinated hydrocarbons that
settle   out  are  decomposed  and removed from  the
environment. Additionally, there is a certain amount of
ash coming off the lime reclaiming furnace which will be
discussed later.

Although a  principal  source  of energy  in the  lime
reclaiming  furnace is the  fuel value contained in the
sludge solids removed from the wastewater, auxiliary
fuel  is required. The fuel traditionally burned has been
natural gas. However, due to the developing natural gas
shortage, an alternative  fuel  burning  capacity will  be
needed. A  Hydroburner  has  been developed for  use in
multiple  hearth and Plural Purpose furnaces which  is
capable of  burning #2, #4 and #6 oil fuels. The normal
4:1 turndown ratio, flame stability and system control
have been  achieved with this new burner. This innova-
tion  is expected to further enhance the practicability of
recalcining  lime while also reducing operating expenses.

The  next step in the liquid stage is for the chemically
clarified water to be piped to a multi-media filter, which
functions to capture any suspended solids that  remain
after  lime  treatment and neutralization. This filtration
prevents  carryover onto  the  carbon column step  which
follows.

The  carbon adsorption and  regeneration  phases come
next. These processes are the same as the ones that have
been used so successfully at the  Lake Tahoe plant since
1965. These are the steps that remove the taste, odor,
color, detergents, inorganics including the solvable prob-
lems of pesticides, chlorinated hydrocrabons, and trace
organics from the wastewater. After the carbon polishing
phase, the  final product  water is either chlorinated and
put to use, or perhaps returned to the water course. The
spent carbon, laden with the dissolved material  it has
adsorbed from the wastewater in  the next to last stage of
treatment,  is regenerated on  site in a multiple hearth
furnace.  During this regeneration process, the organic
material is  pyrolyzed or  distilled off the carbon and  is
then totally oxidized before being scrubbed and exhaust-
ed so that  the  only highly cleansed air is released into
                                   m   Z-M  PROCESS
                                                     T CHEMICALLY CLARIFIED WATER f
RECLAIMED
LIME

AUXILIARY FUEL

'•C
jK
V
k»l





"JSJ2"




_ *-u
^n?



u

$;i
i*i
•fe-
;VH^


                                                             CLEAN CAS
                                                     CO ,    TO ATMOSPHERE
                                                     137

-------
the atmosphere. It is this regeneration step that the final
trace amounts of pesticides, which were  removed from
the water, are  decomposed and thus, eliminated from
the environment.

PCBs,  which are  the most thermally resistant of these
materials, are appearing in the natural environment in
increasing quantities. According to the October 10,1975
issue of Wall Street Journal, "Persistent PCBs loom as a
worse  menace than DDT." PCBs have recently proved
more resistant to natural degradation than DDT. Many
areas now have PCB accumulations exceeding those of
DDT.  Additionally, researchers have  discovered  that
these substances are more toxic than previously thought.
In fact, the  maximum allowable PCB feed concentration
of  5 ppm, as set by the Food and Drug Administration
in  1973, is  presently  considered  unsafe  by many
scientists. A number of animal studies substantiate the
acute  toxic  effects of PCB.  For  instance, a study
reported by the  Wall  Street Journal article  previously
mentioned found increased incidence  of morbidity in
primates fed PCB doses of only  2.5 ppm. PCBs have
proliferated so widely that they are even being detected
in artificial  lakes having no link to either municipal or
industrial effluents.  Such a lake is  ten-year old Lake
Anne in Reston, Virginia, where fish samples were found
having accumulated significant concentrations of PCBs
(1). Samplings of trout and salmon from Lake Michigan
have averaged 22.9 and 10.5 ppm of PCB, respectively.
Fish samples from the waters of the Hudson, Ohio  and
Milwaukee rivers have also shown worrisome PCB levels.

However, the problems associated  with PCBs can  be
reduced  through  sound technological practices. One of
the best economical methods for  disposing of PCBs is
through  the normal incineration procedure in multiple
hearth  furnaces.  Tests show  that 99.9% of PCBs aie
decomposed in the multiple  hearth  furnace at 1100°F
using  a 0.1 second  exhaust  gas detection  time  (2).
Indeed,  according to a United States Geological Service
survey, there appears to be no other way of removing
these highly persistent  materials from the natural envi-
ronment - except in a sewage treatment plant which has
a furnace incorporated into its treatment process. One of
the recently determined benefits of  the  total oxidation
of sludge in the  multiple hearth furnace is that 95% of
the PCBs are destroyed in the normal operation tempera-
ture of the  sludge furnace - which is only 700° F using a
0.1 second  exhaust gas  retention time. This lowered
temperature represents a substantial fuel savings com-
pared  to alternate  methods,  while at no  additional
expense it  destroys 95% of PCB pollutants and  also
complies with EPA recommended performance stand-
ards for furnaces burning sludges found to contain PCBs.

To illustrate how incinerators perform  in terms of air
pollution standards, I  quote from the June  1975  EPA
Technology  Transfer publication  (4),  "Air Pollution
Aspects of Sludge Incineration," which states:
   ". .. the newly  promulgated Federal NSPS (New
   Source Performance Standards) are based on demon-
   strated performance of an operating facility, indicates
   that  use  of  proper emission controls  and proper
   operation of  the  incineration system will  enable a
   facility to meet all existing particulate matter regula-
   tions."

In connection with  a  Livermore, California, treatment
facility,  the  San  Francisco  Bay  Area  Air Pollution
Control District, one of the most stringent air pollution
control districts  in  this country,  rules  that multiple
hearth incinerators  are an  insignificant source of air
pollution (5).

The  toxicity  of metals has caused increasing  concern
over their discharge  in recent years. In response to the
dangers  of  toxic concentrations  of metals entering
potable water supplies, plus the risks from biomagnifica-
tion,  the EPA has  promulgated standards for metals
discharge (6, 7). IPCT processes like the EPA flowsheet
mentioned and high  lime-carbon processes have demon-
strated the removal of substantial quantities of toxic and
undesirable metals from wastewater. A study by Maruy-
ama et al. (8) used various pilot plants to evaluate raw
sewage metal removal efficiency using IPCT processes. A
high and a low lime  system were utilized. The high lime
system used a lime concentration  of 600 mg/1 with a
resultant pH of  11.5, while the low lime system used a
lime concentration of 260 mg/1 and 20 mg/1 of ferric
sulfate with a resultant sludge pH  of 10. The results of
this study are  summarized in Tables I and II. The "new"

                     TABLE I

       Removal of Metals by Low Lime System
Removal (%)

80
85
90
95

-85
-90
-95
- 100
With New
Carbon Column
As
Zn
Mn
Cr+3, Pb, Ni, Cr+6
With Old
Carbon Column
As, Cr+6
Zn, Cn
Cr+3, Pb, Ni
                     TABLE II

       Removal of Metals by High Lime System
Removal (%)

75
80
85
90
95

- 80
-85
- 90
-95
- 100
With New
Carbon Column

Ba
Zn As
Cu Hg
Cr+3, Pb, Ni
Mn, Cd, Cr+6
With Old
Carbon Column
Zn
As
Ba



Cu Hg
Cr43, Pb, Ni
Mn Cd Cr+3
                                                     138

-------
carbon column was a virgin carbon column, while the
"old" carbon column had been in operation about a year
and was  described as needing  regeneration. Notice that
although each process has different removal efficiencies
for particular metals, the removal efficiencies are gener-
ally greater than 90% for both lime processes.
A physical chemical process that is, again, similar to the-
Tahoe tertiary phase is the high lime-carbon adsorption
process, which has been  demonstrated full scale at the
South Tahoe Water Reclamation  plant (9). Several full
scale municipal plants that will use this process are now
under  construction.  Although not  ideally  suited for
waste  streams,  where  suitable,  there  are  numerous
advantages of using independent physical chemical treat-
ment processes over  conventional biological treatment.
An important advantage  of this process, and  indeed all
lime  carbon  IPCT  processes, is that they are  not
susceptible to toxic or shock  loads as is the case with
conventional biological treatment plants.

Another  variation of the high-lime  carbon adsorption
process is  being  installed in  California at the Central
Contra Costa Water  Reclamation Project  plant.  Sched-
uled for completion in early  1976, the 30 mgd  plant,
with  an   ultimate design  capacity  of  120  mgd,  will
incorporate both the lime addition to raw sewage and
recalcination processes,  but in a modified flowsheet. In
this  modified  process,  removal  of  both metals  and
organics  occurs in the recalcining process.  As I mention-
ed earlier, the  principal  product  of the Plural Purpose
Furnace  is  reclaimed lime, which comes from sludge
heavily laden with organics,  phosphorus, metallics and
other toxic substances. To avoid the overloading on the
solids processing, these substances are removed from the
lime-containing sludge before the recalcination step. This
separation  and   removal process prevents  the  solids
processing facility from  being  overloaded  by metals,
organics  and other inerts. Incidentally, pilot test results
for the  Central  Contra  Costa Sanitary District plant
found that  the removal of suspended solids and biolog-
ical  oxygen  demand  was 99%, while phosphorus  and
nitrogen  removal  efficiencies were 96% and 94%, respec-
tively (10).

Ash, mentioned previously, which is a major product of
both lime  reclaiming and  sludge incineration, is being
used experimentally  at  both  Lower Allen Township,
Pennsylvania, and Japan  for fertilizer. Ash could also be
utilized  for  such purposes as building materials,  and
perhaps even to aid in the salting of winter roads. Table
III contains some typical analyses of ash taken from a
tertiary sewage treatment plant.

The  unique cost saving benefit using independent phys-
ical chemical treatment  for primary  treatment in new
plants seeking to  achieve  clean water goals, is in terms of
making an  equipment investment that  can meet long
term objectives of higher quality effluent. This savings
can be demonstrated  by looking at some cost compar-
isons.

Since the purpose of this discussion is to investigate the
costs  of traditional  primary secondary  and  tertiary
treatment,  hereafter called "tertiary", to independent
physical chemical treatment, IPCT, a hypothetical "aver-
age" wastewater was used. The plant influent parameters
are presented in Table IV. It  is recognized that such an
average waste stream does not exist, except for compara-
tive purposes.  Costs were estimated using the economic
criteria set  forth  in Table V, and were derived  through
the use of the Envirotech computer program (11). In no
way are the costs considered precise or totally reflective
of the  actual expenses, but rather the level of accuracy
has been designed  for comparative analyses. The pre-
dicted  experimental error for capital costs are ± 10%,
while the operational  costs are believed to vary ± 15%.
                 TABLE III

  TYPICAL ANALYSIS OF ASH FROM TERTIARY
  QUALITY ADVANCED WASTE TREATMENT
                 SYSTEM

                                Percent of Total
Content
Silica (SiO2)
Alumina (A12O3)
Iron oxide (Fe2C>3)
Magnesium oxide (MgO)
Total calcium oxide (CaO)
Available (free) calcium oxide
(CaO)
Sodium (Na)
Potassium (K)
Boron (B)
Phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5)
Sulfate ion (804)
Sample 1
Lake Tahoe
11/19/69
23.85
16.34
3.44
2.12
29.76

1.16
0.73
0.14
0.02
6.87
2.79
Sample 2
Lake Tahoe
11/25/69
23.72
22.10
2.65
2.17
24.47

1.37
0.35
0.11
0.02
15.35
2.84
               TABLE IV
        Raw Stream Characteristics
BOD5
COD
Flow
Suspended Solids
Alkalinity and Hardness
250 mg/1
450 mg/1
 30 mgd
250 mg/1
250 mg/1 as CaCO3
                                                     139

-------
             Item
    TABLE V

Economic Criteria

      Basis
     Rate
           Labor

           Benefits
           Fuel

           Power

           Maintenance Labor
           Supplies
           Solids Disposal Hauling
           Amortization
           Lime, virgin
           Carbon, virgin
           Carbon makeup
           Lime recalcination Rate
Amounts per unit from
(1) 168 hr/wk, 52 wk/yr
Amounts per unit from (1)
Amounts per unit from (1)


25 years
$5/hr(3.8 rubles/hr)

20% of labor
$2.80/million Btu (w kopecks/
million kg meters)
2t/KWH(4.1 kopecks/
million kg/m)
$5/hr(3.8 rubles/hr)

$10/ton(.8 kopecks/kg)
7% interest
$40/ton (3.4 kopecks/kg)
47
-------
PRIMARY-SECONDARY  TREATMENT WITH PHOSPHOROUS  REMOVAL
                                                                 LIME
                                                                 MULTIPLE
                                                                 HEARTH
                                                                 FURNACE
                                                                    FJGURF C
     PRIMARY-SECONDARY-TERTIARY TREATflENT PLANT

                   LIME
                         141

-------
                                       PHYSICAL CHEMICAL TREATMENT PLANT
                SLUDGE
                MULTIPLE
                HEARTH
                FURNACE
                       RETURN LIME
Two processes which have been shown to produce a
"drinkable  quality"  water  are  traditional  primary-
secondary  and  tertiary  treatment,  and  independent
physical chemical treatment, IPCT-II (where applicable).
The capital cost of the tertiary process is $32.8 million
for a sample 30-million gpd plant, as compared to $28.7
million  for  the  IPCT-II plant. The  operating  cost,
including  amortization,  of   the   tertiary   plant  is
63.2
-------
costs encountered in IPCT-II facilities over  biological
plants   having   tertiary  treatment  (carbon  columns)
added. Water reclamation, which is now being seriously
considered by more industries and communities in both
the  U.S.  and  Soviet Union,  can  be  a cost effective
procedure  for IPCT plants. The California State Water
Resources Control Board considers the  cost of reclaimed
water as reflective of collection and treatment expenses
incurred through the secondary level of treatment. Since
this  is mandated into law, utilizing this concept yields
reclaimed water at  less than  half  the price  from our
sample  IPCT-II  plant (where  the  influent is applicable)
compared to the same water from the tertiary flowsheet
discussed. The cost for tertiary plant reclaimed water is
14.1
-------
                           PROCESSING AND NEUTRALIZATION OF INDUSTRIAL
                        WASTES FROM IRON AND STEEL EFFLUENTS TREATMENT

                                          O.P. Ostrovsky, U.M. Souproun,
                                          U.N. Reznikov
                                          VNIPIChermetenergoochistka
   The iron and steel enterprises effluents contain some
contaminants  which  are  specific for  the  branch  of
industry. The contaminants may be subdivided into 3
groups:   soluble  and  insoluble  mineral  and  organic
compounds.
   During the effluent treatment and the stabilization of
water supply systems the following waste materials are
formed — sludges, high mineralized effluents and wastes
with organic compounds.

                      Sludges

   The iron and steel plant sludges may be divided as
follows:
   —iron containing sludges. The group involves mill
scale, sludges  from the gas cleaning of sintering, blast
furnace, open hearth, converter and electric steel plants;
   —gypsum  containing sludges. They include  sludges.
They include  sludges which are formed in the lime gas
desulphuration process in the neutralization process of
the effluents containing sulphur  oxides;
   —others. They involve treatment products formed in
small quantities:  sludges from  casting machines, ferro-
alloy  furnace gas cleaning plants, scarfing machines etc.
   The materials ratio is as follows.
   Iron containing sludges including:         — 89,16%
   a/  sintering plants                        - 32,50%
   b/ blast furnace stockhouse               - 10,83%
   c/  blast  furnace gas cleaning  plants        - 19,17%
   d/ open hearth furnace gas cleaning plants  -  3,16%
   e/  converter gas cleaning                 -  3,00%
   f/ electric  furnace gas cleaning plants      —  0,50%
   g/  mill scale                             - 20,00%
   Gypsum containing sludges including:      —  6,67%
   — desulphuration sludges                 —   2,5%
   — sludges from neutralized sulphur effluents    4,17%
   Other sludges and dusts                  -  4,17%
                   TOTAL
-   100%
Sintering plant sludges
   Up  to 90 -  95% sludges  are  formed  in  sintering
housings during hydraulic blasting of gas collectors filter
bags, fan system collectors during hydraulic cleaning of
rooms  and pipelines from dry and wet cleaning units for
waste gases and fan systems.
   The  remaining  5-10% sludges  come  from  other
sintering plant departments: charge treatment housing,
lime calcination  housing,  stock yards, car dumpers and
so on.  The main sources of their  formation are  fan
systems and  charge  materials falls.  The  sludges from
equipment and pipelines washing as well as sludges from
hydraulic  rooms  cleaning are supplied at a time  and
irregularly.
   Great bulk of sludges consists of sinter particles as
well  as  raw materials:  ore, coke, coal, limestone. As a
rule  sintering  plants  products are of rather coarse  size
distribution. Sludges from dust bags of gas collectors  and
hydraulic  cleaning include 60-65% particles > 0,3 mm,
from installations for dry and wet cleaning up to 10%
particles > 0,3 mm, the greatest part of fines is  in the
sludges from fans.
   All sludges contain  a large quantity  (26 to 36%) of
particles sizes  of which are 0,15-0,05 mm. Some sludges
have a  lot of particles < 0,005 mm,  and it may be
accounted  for more  efficient cleaning  process of waste
gases. Solid  phase  density  of sludges from  sintering
plants is 3 to 4 g/cm^.

   Sludges from stock houses of blast furnace shops

   Sources of  sludges formation are falls from conveying
and  production equipment; dust deposition on building
and  equipment elements, as well as  dust from wet  and
dry air cleaning systems.
   Composition of sludges from stock houses  is similar
to those from sintering plants and gas cleaning installa-
tions of blast furnaces. As to the particles size they may
be classified as coarse-sized ones (up  to 60% particles of
0,01-0,05  mm size). Solid phase  density of sludges from
the under-bins premises is from 3,9 to 4,2 g/cm^.

        Sludges from gas cleaning installations
                  of blast furnaces

   Sludges  are formed during the  scrubbing of blast
furnace  gases and they are a mixture of fine particles of
the ore, fluxes, coke, entrained  from the blast furnace
by the  gas stream. Passing through  a reducing zone of
the  furnace  they are partially  reduced  and partially
oxidized and  combine. As a result of it sludges contain
primary ore elements and new compounds created in the
blast furnace.
   Size  distribution  of sludges  from  the  gas cleaning
plants of blast furnaces is similar to the size distribution
of sintering plants sludges and in some cases at the high
efficiency  of  blast  furnace  gases in dry dust catchers,
their particles  are similar.
                                                     144

-------
   As to the chemical composition sludges of effluents
from  gas  cleaning installations of blast furnaces, espe-
cially coarse-sized are  also similar to sintering plants
sludges. Fines contain  a smaller amount of iron com-
pounds  and a greater amount of silicon oxides. Solid
phase density  of sludges from gas cleaning installations
of blast  furnaces is 2,2 to 4 g/cm^.

        Sludges from gas cleaning installations
        of converter and open hearth furnaces
                        shops

   Sludges include the finest particles of oxides of iron,
aluminum, calcium, manganese and other elements. The
main  component  consists  of iron oxides. As  to  the
structure  the  particles  are regular  spheres of different
sizes coated with a thin reddish crust. Size distribution
of sludges is mainly presented  by the finest particles
with a  diameter 0 to 50  . Density of a solid part of
sludges  from the gas  cleaning installations of converter is
3,3 to  4,4 g/cm3, of open hearth  shops - 4,3 to 4,9
g/cm3 due to a high iron content in sludges.

      Sludges from gas  cleaning plants of electric
                  melting furnaces

   Sludge  composition depends on the charge ratio or on
kinds of the output being melted grade of steel, type of
alloy). Sludges include a relatively large quantity of iron
compounds /30  to   40%/,  as well  as  of heavy and
non-ferrous metals (chrome, nickel, manganese, magne-
sium). In  some sludges chrome content may reach 10%,
nickel  -  8%,  manganese -  7%, magnesium - 20%.
Sludges  may also include titanium,  tungstem, vanadium
and  other elements. As to  their  particles  size these
sludges  are similar to sludges  from the gas cleaning of
converter  and open  hearth furnace shops. Solid phase
density  in these sludges makes up 2 to  4 g/cm3.

                     Mill scale

   The sludge  consists of iron  oxides with content 33,0
to 65,0%  FeO and 63,0 to 27,0% Fe2O3- In addition to
the solid  phase  the scale comprises 5 to 20% oil. Mill
rolls, rollers, roll tables,  hot and cold saws cooling water,
descaling  and roll table  pit washing wastes are contami-
nated with scale  and lubricating oils.  The scale content
of wastes  is 2 to 4% rolled metal weight. Scale falling
under mill  and  roll  tables is conveyed  to  a primary
settling  basin which is a scale pit  for settling 80 to 85%
coarse scale.
   Preliminary clarified waste waters are directed  by
gravity from the primary settling basin to a secondary
one where fine  scale is settled in quantity about 10%
coarse one.
   The  scale is  classified  to  coarse  (>10mm),  inter-
mediate which is washed out  from  a pit  under the mill
and brought away along channel bottom (10mm and
less) and fine (<2mm). The amount of intermediate and
fine scale varies depending on mill type and rolled metal
grade.
   Scale solid phase density is 5,15 to 5,0 g/cm^.

                Desulphuration sludge

   The sludge  forms in the process  of wet limestone
scrubbing of sintering off-gases.
   It consists  principally from  calcium  carbonate and
sulphite.
   Sludge particle  size distribution varies greatly and is a
function of limestone grinding fineness while a desulph-
uration suspension  preparing.  The sludge solid phase
density is 2,6 to 2,7 g/cirP.

        Neutralized sulphuric acid waste  sludge

   The sludge  forms while neutralizing  waste pickling
liquors and  pickling line washing waters.  The wastes are
usually neutralized with lime suspension. The neutraliz-
ing  precipitates contain  principally gypsum and iron
hydrooxides. The  sludge solids are very dispersed and
precipitated with great difficulty.

                    Other sludges

   The sludges form in  very small amounts, and  their
utilization is not a serious problem in comparison with a
total volume  of  all solid  wastes through  utilization
methods  are required to be determined in every concrete
circumstances for these wastes too.

       HIGH-MINERALIZED WASTE WATERS

   These wastes include neutralized washing waters and
waste pickling liquors, regeneration and washing waters
of reagent water treating systems, recirculation system
blowing-down waters from  metal working process and
wet  gas cleaning units. The wastes are characterized by
multicomponent  salt  composition  and  salt  content
exceeding sanitary standards. The most of these waters
are saturated  with  CaSO^  The total amount of the
waste waters to be neutralized at steel or metal working
plants can approach 500 m^/h.

                ORGANIC WASTES

Waste rolling oils

   The  wastes  form while  treating  or decomposing
lubricating and cooling emulsions. The lubricating and
cooling emulsion treating oil wastes contain 20 to 50%
water and up  to 10% mechanical impurities.  Oil wastes
that are  formed while decomposing an  emulsion  after
clarifying  contain  up  to  5%  water and about 3%
                                                     145

-------
mechanical impurities. The impurities  consist  mainly
from fine  iron oxides. Oil waste specific yield is 0,5 to
 1,5 kg/t rolled product.

Waste decreasing solutions

   The  wastes include emulsified oils, anorganic deter-
gents (Na2C03, NaOH, Na3P04 etc) as well as different
surfactants. There are up to  0,5% oil,  up to  100 g/1
anorganic  detergents, up to 1% surfactants. The waste
degreasing solutions  yield approaches 3-5 m /h at an
intermediate capacity metal working plant.
     WASTES UTILIZATION, TREATMENT AND
                NEUTRALIZATION

Sludges

   Iron containing sludges can be utilized in sintering,
blast-furnace and steel production processes according to
wastes composition. They can be used at sintering plants
without  any  preliminary  pelletizing and at others in
briquettes  or pellet form. The iron  containing sludges
dumping together  with other sludges  in settling pond as
practicized  at some mainly old works results in metal
losses and surrounding pollution. Therefore modern steel
plants  are  commissioned  in  conjunction  with  iron
containing sludges treatment and utilization systems.
   According to references a total utilized iron contain-
ing sludges amount is now about 63.0%.The sludges are
used the most successfully at sintering plants. The most
of them are the  same  plants sludges.  Sometimes they
include also steel  production and seldom blast furnaces
gas cleaning systems sludges.
   The sludges  using  without any  special  dewatering
units is  hindered  because  their high humidity makes
their  conveyance   difficult,  results  in  the  plant  site,
equipment and hall pollution. A preliminary preparing
operation  in  special units (dewatering and  drying) is
necessary  as well  while utilizing steel  production  gas
cleaning systems sludges in pelletized form (as briquettes
or pellets)  in blast-furnace and steel production proc-
esses.
   Gypsum containing sludges can be efficiently utilized
to reclaim and fertilize  acid soils. The studies performed
have shown corn  crops to increase by 25 to 50% as a
result  of  desulphuration  systems and sulphuric  acid
liquors neutralization units sludges applying in amount
of 4 to 5 t per ha.
   The sludges must be dewatered to 6 to 8% humidity
before being applied. They can be utilized also as a base
for a constructional 250-350 grade cement and further
for constructional concretes and elements.
   Thus,  a  prinicpal condition  of successful sludge
utilization  is special  dewatering  (preparing)  systems
development.
Sludges dewatering equipment and methods

   Sludges dewatering  units  are  following:  classifiers,
vacuum filters, press filters, centrifuges.
   Classifiers.  They  are  used  to  classify  multisized
suspension solids with size  up to 1 to 5 mm into 2 or
more fractions. The classifiers can be of two main types:
settling or  centrifugal  units. As to settling classifiers
horizontal clarifiers, spiral and elevator classifiers are put
in practice  to dewater waste  water sludges.  Out of
centrifugal  classifiers  bent  sieves or  conical  screens,
hydrocyclones and settling centrifuges are employed.
   Horizontal clarifiers are the simplest classifiers. They
are put in rather wide practice of metallurgical  waste
treatment. The clarifiers are not quite efficient. A fault
of them is low sludge dewatering rate.
   Because  of  relatively  low classification rate,  poor
discharge  mechanization and small dewatering rate the
clarifiers are designed no longer but are  to be replaced
by more perfect equipment.
   Spiral classifiers. These devices have been  used for a
long time in ore-treating industry. They are more widely
spread in  the sludge dewatering  practice of metallurgical
plants than all the other types of mechanical  classifiers.

   In designs of  batch  produced spiral classifiers, bath
and  conveyer parameters are chosen  according to the
working conditions on ore pulps, which as a rule contain
a considerable amount  of solid phase. However, in the
conditions  of  dewatering  units  treating metallurgical
plant  sludges,  considerably diluted  suspensions are
mostly supplied  to  the  classification.  The adopted
relations of bath and discharging conveyer parameters of
batch designs are not optimal in  this case.
   Due to  this   fact  one  should  reconstruct  spiral
classifier baths to increase the drainage loading.

Elevator classifiers or dredging sumps.

   These  devices  are  taken from  coal  concentration
industry.  The design is quite simple — they  consist of
sump, in  which the dewatering elevator  boot is placed
for  sedimented  sludge  output.  Their  operation  on
metallurgical  plant sludges is  not practically investi-
gated. The loadings are taken on analogy with those on
coal  concentration  plants,  though  the  difference in
working conditions is even more  in  this case then in
previously discussed one with spiral classifiers.
   Bent and  conical  sieves are  also  taken  from coal
concentration  field.  These  units  are  characterized by
simple design,  high production rate and  operational
reliability. Yet they are rarely used in sludge  dewatering
practice of  treating metallurgical plant wastes, but seem
quite promising.
   Hydrocyclones  are widely used in water treatment
and sludge dewatering practice. Design methods applied
to  different types of ore  sludges are available. As for
                                                       146

-------
metallurgical plant sludges, these methods  need some
specifications.
   Bowl  centrifuges  are  often  treated  as  dewatering
equipment not of classifying type, though practically
they are classifiers, because of  quite low meaning of
boundary  grain  size  and  that  is  why  they  will  be
discussed later on.
   Vacuum filters. Band, disk and drum vacuum filters
are used in the  precipitate treatment of metallurgical
plant.
   Band  vacuum  filters  are used for  coarse  sludge
dewatering as well as for not-classified sludge, when the
unit production   rate is low.  Both  band and drum
vacuum filters are characterized by small filtering surface
per unit of area occupied.
   Disk vacuum  filters are  used for sludge dewatering
with size  0,3 to 0,1 mm  from gas  cleaning units of
sintering, blast furnace and converter processes. They are
most widely spread than other types of filters.
   Drum vacuum filters are  used in the same cases as the
disk ones.  In our country drum filters  are relatively rare.
   Press  filters.  In practice of  waste  water precipitate
treatment of metallurgical plants press filters are  applied
to dewatering of precipitates which are hard to dewater
(sludges of open-hearth gas cleaning units; sulphuric acid
liquor neutralization sludges, etc)
   High  classifying rate  is  guaranteed:  the precipitate
contains a minimum quantity  of moisture, and the
filtrate is of maximum purity. Press filters have relatively
simple design, highly developed  filtering surface per unit
of  occupied area and allow to use high pressure drop
that is especially important when dewatering suspensions
with high-dispersed solid phase.
   In  practice of precipitate dewatering  of metallurgical
plant waste waters automatic chamber type  press filters
with plate clam  of FPACM type (institute  UkrNIIChi-
mmash  and Berdichev chemical machine works "Prog-
ress" design) got some spreading.
   Press filters are produced with filtering surface of 2,5;
5;  10;  25 and  50  m2.  FPACM press  filter  metal
consumption per  weight unit of filtered products is 2-3
times  lower  than  that  of  frame  press filters,  and
production rate  is  4-6  times  higher. All  the  filtering
processes are automatized.
   Centrifuges. Centrifuges are not widely spread in the
practice of waste water  precipitate treatment at metal-
lurgical plants in our country.
   At present investigations are  carried  out on applica-
tion of bowl centrifuges with screw discharge conveyor
for dewatering different sludges.
   Application — of  such equipment provides consider-
able simplification of sludge dewatering methods, as it
allows to  reduce  a  number  of equipment units and
dewatering units room volume.
   Process flow  diagrams.  Conditionally one  can dis-
tinguish three types of process flow diagrams:
    1) for multisized sludge dewatering
   2) for dewatering of monodispersed sludge of inter-
mediate size
   3) for high dispersed sludge dewatering.
   The first type is characterized by sludge classification
to 2-3 fractions, each of them is dewatered separately on
its type of equipment.
   Usually the largest fraction is dewatered in classifiers,
the  fraction of  intermediate  size — in band  vacuum
filters and the  finest fraction in disk or drum  vacuum
filters. Sometimes both intermediate and fine fractions
are dewatered together in disk or drum vacuum filters.
   The second type  diagram is widely used for dewater-
ing of converter  gas cleaning units sludge, and includes
disk and drum vacuum filters as dewatering devices. The
third type can be used for  dewatering of open hearth
and  electromelting  furnaces gas cleaning units sludges
and  for neutralized sulphuric acid sludge; it is character-
ized by press filter application.
   Equipment operational parameters depend on physical
and  mechanical properties of suspension being dewater-
ed.
   For the present a considerable number of studies on
operational  parameters of vacuum filters, press filters,
centrifuges and classifiers for different sludges has  been
carried out.
   Investigations on  sintering sludge  dewatering resulted
in determining band and disk vacuum filters operational
parameters.  For  band vacuum  filters while  dewatering
+0,25(0,3)  mm  sintering  sludge  with  primary  pulp
concentration 400-600 g/1, it is recommended loading
of 4,0 to  5,0 t/m2 h and dewatered precipitate moisture
-13 to 15%.
   For disk vacuum filters loadings  are maintained in
dependence of  feeding  -  30   fraction content  with
concentration of solids 400 g/1.
 Table 1
       Specific production rate of disk vacuum
       filters versus size distribution of solids in
       feeding.
  Specific production rate
  kg/ml h while concentra-
  tion of solids in feeding is
  400 g/1
30 u fraction content
in filter feeding, %
       450
       400
       320
       250
       150
       100
      10
      20
      30
      40
      50
      60
                                                       147

-------
   Following correction factors taking into account the
concentration are introduced: 500 g/1 - 1,05; 600 g/1 -
1,30; 700 g/1 - 1,65; 800 g/1 - 2,20; 900 g/1 - 2,60.
   Dewatered pricipitate  humidity  after disk vacuum
filters  depends  upon the  solid  phase  granulometric
composition, used  vacuum rate, precipitate depth and
other factors. It may vary within close range 18 to 22%.
   While de watering converter gas cleaning system sludge
production rate of disk vacuum filters is 0,07  to 0,1
t/m2/h, dewatered  sludge humidity is within range 27  to
35%. Due to rather high humidity dewatered converter
sludge  is usually  subjected  to  thermal  drying after
vacuum filters.
   While dewatering  sludge  formed in sintering plants
limestone gas desulphuration process on vacuum filters
following data were  obtained:  unit  load - 50  - 125
kg/m2h (corresponding to concentration extreme values
of initial suspension 100  - 500 kg/m2h),  precipitate
humidity 28 to 30%.
   Conditions of press filters working on various types
of  precipitates  were investigated.  The studies were
carried  out on  sludge  of open hearth, converter and
electric  steel furnace gas cleaning systems, on desulphur-
ation units sludge of sintering plants and also on sludge
obtained while neutralizing sulphur acid effluents. Table
2 illustrates data on dewatering of  open hearth, con-
verter and  electric steel furnace  gas cleaning  systems
sludges from different plants.
   Press filter  production rate depending upon physical
and  mechanical  sludge  properties, pulp  concentration
and  cycle characteristic was within  range 40 to 95
kg/m2h at precipitate humidity - 14 to 33%.
   In experiments with dewatering of sludge, formed in
the limestone  gas cleaning desulphuration process, speci-
fic production rate on  press filters FPACM was 150 to
330  kg/m2h (corresponding to concentration extreme
values of initial suspension - 150 to 400 g/1) and
dewatered precipitate humidity - 15 to 18%.
   While  dewatering  sludge  formed  as   a  result  of
sulphuric  acid waste neutralization by lime milk specific
production  rate of press filters was 5 to 12 kg/m2h at
solid content  in  initial  pulp 1,5 to 5% respectively and
                          Data on dewatering of sludge from steel furnaces gas-cleaning
                                      system on filter-press tfTlKM -0,5
                                                                                      Table  2
Typo
of
sludge
1
Open-hearth gas-cleaning
system (plant A)
Open-hearth gas-cleaning
system (plant B)
Open-hearth gas-cleaning
system (plant D)
Converter gas-cleaning
system (plant A)
Converter gas-cleaning
system (plant B)
Converter gas-cleaning
system (plant C)
Electric steel furnace
gas-cleaning system
(plant A)
Electric steel furnace
gas-cleaning system
(plant B)
Electric steel furnace
gas-cleaning system
(plant C)
Solid pha-
se content
in suspen-
sion,
s/i
2
450-470
270-300
250-280
360-J80
250-270
530-350
270-300
370-400
240-260
Working
pres-
sure,
atm
3
4.0
4.5
4.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Cycle characteristic
total
dura-
tion,
min
4
8
16
8
14
15
10
18
9
7
filt-
ration
*ime,
min
5
3
12
4
10
11
6
13
5
3
preci-
pitate
drying
time,
min
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
Obtained data
precipi-
tate
depth,
mm
7
4-5
S-7
4-5
10-12
6-7
11-12
4-5
10-11
8-9
precipi-
tate hu-
midity,
%
8
17-18
20-20.5
19-20
32-33
19-20
25-26
14-15
29-30
21-22
iltrate
olid
ontent,
g/1
9
up to 4
up to 3
up to 3
up to 3
up to 3
ip to 3
ip to 4
ip to 3
ip to 4
pecific
roduc-
ion ratex
.g/m2 h
10
60-70
40-45
55-60
60-65
50-55
90-95
45-50
75-80
75-60
                                                      148

-------
precipitate humidity was 58 to 61%.
   It  was  stated  that  in addition to  physical  and
mechanical solid properties the production rate of press
filters used for dewatering of hot rolling mills scale in
secondary settling  basins  is greatly influenced  by oil
content  in  pulp.  Thus at  a plant in  a process  of
dewatering scale  containing  20% oil (in  reference  to
oiled  solids) specific production rate  on press filters
FPACM  was  10 to 25 kg/m2 h (at  solid concentration
140 to 550 g/1 respectively) while at another plant  with
the same concentrations  of  scale,  containing 8% oil,
specific production rate  was about 25 to 75 kg/m2h.
   Filtration  of  oiled pulp  was shown to  be  greatly
improved by addition of lime milk. While dewatering the
said scale containing 20% oil lime addition to the pulp in
theoretical amount  of  2 g CaO/1  resulted in 2,5  — 3
times increase  of  specific production  rate.  The  lime
addition  did not influence  greatly on precipitate humid-
ity which was within range  10 to 12%.
   Under relatively small oil content in scale (up to 10%)
the lime addition  influence  much less  on production
rate.
   Both  dewatering and  deoiling are  the aim  of the
process of scale treatment before utilization. However,
filtration process cannot provide effective oil separation
since   oil passing  through precipitate  filter layer is
adsorbed on solid phase particle surface, as a result of
which process its considerable part is left in precipitate.
   With  the aim of searching out more effective methods
of such  a sludge treatment the dewatering and deoiling
processes of the  secondary settling  basin scale in  bowl
centrifuges with screw conveyer discharge of sludge  were
studied.  These   studies showed  that  as  to deoiling
the centrifugation process in  bowl centrifuge  has a
considerable advantage in comparison with the filtration
process,  especially  for  the  scale  with  the great oil
content.
   These studies  were carried in full-scale  centrifuge of
NOGSh-32S type.  The  centrifuge throughput on  pulp
was 2.5  to 4.0 rrP/h with  the solids content 50 to 350
g/1.
   The humidity of dewatered precipitate was  in the
range" of 10 to 20%, and the oil content in the range of 2
to 5%.
   The  using  of  bowl  centrifuges  may be  also  very
promising  for  treatment  of  the   other  precipitates.
However, it  requires the carrying out of definite studies
connected with finishing and putting into the practice of
this equipment.
   In  conclusion it should  be noted that in present some
decisions on process flow  diagrams of main steel plants
sludges dewatering  are available and this does not hinder
putting into practice modern dewatering units. The main
factor  decelerating the  construction of these plants are
too slow rates  of construction, although namely these
plants are one of the important resources of raw material
utilizing  methods improving in steel-making industry.
           HIGH MINERALIZED WASTES

   One  of the main trends in high mineralized  wastes
neutralization is thermal desalting. The wastes desalting
problem is  the  complex of problems  connected with
high concentration, obtaining of dry salts, their utiliza-
tion and storage.
   The  most of steel  plants wastes are saturated with
components  capable to  form the scale  on the heating
surfaces, that is why  the main  difficulties  while high
concentrating such  wastes  are  connected  with the
control  of scale formation.
   In  present, in steel-making industry one pilot plant
for thermal desalting is  operated with production rate
100 m^/h. For high concentrating scale-forming  wastes
tubular  vaporizers with forced circulation are applied.
   Studies  data  and plants operation practice for sea
water desalting show the following types of wastes deep
concentrating plants are the most  reasonable.
   1.  Vaporizers with adiabatic evaporators and heating
of  evaporating  water  in contact heaters with  water-
repellent or gaseous heat-transfer agent.
   2.  Vaporizers with  tubular evaporators and prelimi-
nary softening of water by thermal and reagent methods.
   For small production rate plants vaporizers consisting
of two  or  three tubular devices with forced circulation
of water concentrated by evaporation.
   In present,  two  types of vaporizers  for high con-
centrating and drying of drop-forming wastes have been
developed. Multibodied vaporizer with tubular evapora-
tors and thermal softening of initial water which is to be
constructed  at one  of  the  Ural plants,  as  well as a
multibodied  plant with adiabatic evaporators and heat-
ing of  water concentrated by evaporation  in contact
device with water-repellent heat-transfer agent is  also to
be constructed at one of the Ukraine plants.
   The  still residue drying at these plants is provided for
in fluidized bed furnaces.
   The  problems of  salt utilization are being studied in
laboratory conditions.

  WASTES WITH ORGANIC COMPOUND CONTENT

   One  of the main methods of liquid wastes neutraliza-
tion containing organic compounds in different branches
of the USSR industry is flame method. Lately, the most
widespreaded agregates   for  flame  neutralization are
cyclone furnaces.
   For  burning  of oil  wastes and for waste degreasing
solutions flame  neutralization  the  cyclone furnaces of
different  production  rate have  been  developed.  The
cyclone  type devices  are being constructed at  some
steel-making  and metal working  plants.  They are char-
acterized by high  specific parameters. Volume specific
intencity  when  burning  oil  wastes is about  5.10"
kcal/m-%. Volume specific loading while solution neu-
tralizating is approximately 1 t/m^h.
                                                      149

-------
            FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF SELECTING THE METHOD FOR PROCESSING
                    SEWAGE SEDIMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR PROPERTIES
                              Prof. N.A. Lukinykh, D.Sc. (Eng.), Deputy Director of
                              Research for City Water Supply and Treatment
                              I.S.  Turovsky,  Cand.Sc.  (Eng.),  Head  of Sediment
                              Treatment and Utilization.
   One of the most intricate  problems associated with
protection  of water reservoirs  from  pollution is the
treatment of the sediment.
   Sewage sediments belong to the class of hard-to-filter
silt suspensions, their treatment is complicated by their
large size and high humidity.
   The sediment treatment methods include fermenta-
tion in anaerobic and aerobic conditions, drying on silt
pads and ponds; dehydration on vacuum filters, centri-
fuges, filter presses and other  devices, and decontamina-
tion by thermal treatment or incineration.
   Silty pads and silt ponds, which are widely used for
drying sediments, are  extremely inefficient and occupy
large areas in city outskirts.
   The use of mechanical dehydration makes it possible
to considerably reduce the areas and time required for
sediment drying, with simultaneous mechanization and
automation of the process.
   Mechanical  dehydration  can be applied both  to
fermented and unfermented sediments.
   Among  the  methods for  mechanical dehydration,
drum-type vacuum filters are most widely used.
   The  capacity  of vacuum  filters  depends on the
composition and properties of the sediments, the ratio
between  the sediment  from the primary settlers and
active silt in the mixture, and also on the methods for
preparation of  the sediments  for dehydration. Of great
importance  is  the  composition of the  sewage  under
treatment. All these factors differ from aeration station
to another.
   The extent  of water removal from the sediment is
indicated by the specific resistance  of the sediment to
filtration.
   The specific resistance of a sediment is found from
the formula.
where:
              is the specific resistance of the sediment,
              is the pressure (vacuum),
              is the filtering area,
              is the filtrate viscosity,
              is the concentration of dry matter in the
              sediment,
              is  a  parameter   characterizing  water
              removal from the sediment,
              is the filtering time after the pressure was
              set up,
              is  the filtrate  volume  obtained after a
              constant pressure was set up.
   In determining the specific resistance of the sediment
the parameter  "b"  can be  obtained  experimentally,
while the value of "r" can be calculated from Eq.(l) /!/.
   The specific  resistance of sediments at city aeration
stations varies widely. An analysis of specific resistance
values  shows that unfermented sediments in  primary
settlers and uncompacted active silt have  a much lower
specific resistance than fermented sediments.
   A sediment fermented in thermophilic conditions has
the highest specific resistance. It has also been establish-
ed that the higher the specific resistance, the lower is the
capacity  of  the  vacuum-filters and the more  thorough
the treatment which must be undergone by the sediment
prior to mechanical dehydration. /!/.
   Calculation  formulas  have  been  proposed  which
enable  one to determine the amount of eater necessary
for washing  the fermented sediments, the doze of the
chemical reagents required for sediment coagulation, the
expected capacity of the  vacuum filters, and also the
optimum conditions of their operation /2/.
   The specific  resistance of the fermented particles by
washing with water or purified sewage. The curves of
reduction  in  the specific  resistance  of the fermented
sediments in  the course  of  their washing  can be
approximated by the equation
                          R0-
                                 -an
where:
          "o =  ro . 10~1^ is the specific resistance of
             the washed sediment, cm/g;
          RH =  rn . lO'lO is the specific resistance of
             the washed sediment, cm/g;
           n =  is the  amount of washing water, cu m
             per 1 cu m sediment;
           a =  is a  coefficient  depending  on  the
             concentration of the initial and washed
             sediment, the removal of the  suspended
             matter with the  drain  water, and other
             factors,  which varies  within  the  range
             from 0.04 to 0.14.
   The filtering devices show stable operation when the
specific resistance  of the  sediments  reduces from the
initial value to (5  - 50 x  10^ cm/g, respectively. For
most  sediments, the  above reduction is achieved  by
coagulation  or   flocculation with the aid of chemical
reagents.
   The optimum dose of reagents is established from the
curves of reduction in the specific  resistance of the
                                                    150

-------
sediment during experimental coagulation with different
doses.
   The reagent  dose can be tentatively determined from
the formula:                	
              D = k(VIvV-§-- 0.001 alk),           3
where:
         D  is the  reagent dose  in per  cent of the
             sediment dry weight;
         R  r . 10~10 is the sediment specific resist-
             ance, cm/g;
         h  is the sediment humidity, %;
         c  is the concentration  of the sediment dry
             matter, %;
        alk  is the sediment alkalinity, mg/1;
          k  is a coefficient depending on the type and
             chemical  composition  of  the   reagent
             used.
   The efficiency of the drum-type  filters is determined
from the formula:
where:
        LI    is the vacuum filter capacity, kg/m^ per
              hour, with reference to the sediment dry
              matter;
      hi  lid  is the humidity of the initial and dehydra-
              ted sediment, respectively, %
        f    is  the density of the initial sediment,
              t/m3;
        in    is the duration of the vacuum effect in
              relation to the total filtering cycle, %;
        P    is the working vacuum, mm Hg;
        £     is the filtrate viscosity, cp;
       M    is the drum revolution time, min.
   Slimes with a low specific resistance often do not
require  any treatment prior to  dehydration. They can
also  be  used for  reducing  the  specific resistance of
sediments in  city  sewage.  In particular,   such  slimes
include products of neutralization of sulphuric-acid  -
containing etching  solution with lime, and waste from
some industrial enterprises.
   When  choosing  the  sediment treatment  method, a
study into the mechanism of binding of the water the
solid particles of the sediment is of considerable impor-
tance as well as specific resistance evaluation /2/.
   From the classification of the types of water binding
proposed by  Rebinder  it follows that  breaking of the
water-solid bonds requires the expenditure  of a definite
energy. The vacuum at which the sediments are dehydra-
ted on the vacuum filters equals 400 to 500 mm Hg. The
theoretical limit for water removal by vacuum filtering is
the water content  of microcappilaries with  a radius of
not less  than  0.005 mm. Filter pressing or centrifuging
during which  higher pressures are developed removes a
greater  amount of  water from the sediments, and the
filtered sediment has a lower water content as compared
with  vacuum  filtering. The maximum amount  of water
removed from the sediments by mechanical  dehydration
    is  characterized by  the position  of the first critical
    humidity point (Fig. 1) and  depends on the  type of
    sediment and the degree of its readiness for  mechanical
    dehydration.
       It can be seen from the figure that compacted active
    silt contains more hard-to-remove water than a ferment-
    ed sediment, while the latter contains more such water
    than  the  unfermented  sediment  from  the  primary
    settlers.
       The water content of the active silt on  section b,c
    reduces from  98  to  87.5%, that  of the fermented
    mixture,  from  97.5  to  84.6%, and that of the unfer-
    mented sediment from the primary settlera, from  94.6
    to 73%.
       When  sediments are coagulated with chemical  rea-
    gents, part of the water bound by the physicomechanical
    and physicochemical bond is released and the amount of
    adsorption-bound water is reduced. The value of the first
    critical point decreases as well.
       Aeration stations  with a capacity of up to 50 thous.
    nr'/day use the sediment centrifuging method.
       Centrifuging can be effected either with or without
    the use  of chemical reagents. A  disadvantage of  this
    method,  which limits the scope of its application, is the
    large amount of suspended solid carried away with the
    fugate.
       The  efficiency  of retention of the sediment  dry
    matter  during  centrifuging  is  determined from  the
    formula
    where: Csec}, Cc and Cf are, respectively, the concentra-
    tions of the initial sediment, the cake, and the fugate.
       Investigations  show that in approximate calculation
    of the dry matter retention efficiency  one can use data
    obtained on laboratory cup centrifuges.
                                    c - Jrt erttt«»l
                                      dlty polat
    Fig. I. Curve* Of •adl»*nt drying lnt«a«Vtj
        I- compacted active silt
        2- fezwatetf BediMBt
        3- tmfvraeoted sediment,
151

-------
   The centrifuge  capa city index is expressed by the
relation
              E = F  • S,m2,                       6
where:
          F  is  the  surface  area  of the  centrifuge
              draining cylinder;
          S   is the separation  factor.
where:        '    g
          W  is the rotor angular radius, m;
          R  is the rotor radius, m;
          g  is the gravity acceleration, m/sec^.
   In order  to  determine  the type  and size  of the
centrifuge,  one  can  change  the  surface  area  of the
draining cylinder by varying the diameter of the draining
orifice only  within a small range, whereas the separation
factor  can  be varied  up to  2000-3500 for the  same
machine.
   The  sediment  residence  time  in  the  rotor  of an
industrial centrifuge,  which  depends on  the  capacity
index, is  changed mainly by regulating the centrifuge
capacity.  Hence, the principal parameters to be deter-
mined when  simulating  the  process  is the separation
factor and  the  centrifuging  time.  The  effect of the
separation factor and centrifuging time on the efficiency
of sediment separation is easily determined on  a labora-
tory-type cup centrifuge.
   A comparison  of  the results of experiments on  a
laboratory  and  an  industrial  centrifuge suggested  a
method  for  tentative estimation  on the dry  matter
retention efficiency with an  industrial centrifuge from
laboratory data  with the use of the "centrifuging index"
proposed by us /3/:
                   V
where:
           V is the volume of the compacted sediment,
              cm-
           V0 is the  volume  of the initial  sediment,
              cm-',
           C is the concentration of the initial  sedi-
              ment, g/1.
   The results  of the experiments  carried  out on  a
 laboratory-type  centrifuge show  that the  process  of
 separation of all  types  of  sediment is stable when
 centrifuging  lasts over  2 min and  the  speed  of the
 centrifuge rotor is 6000 rpm; the centrifuging index is
 actually independent of the concentration of the initial
 sediment and remains constant for  a definite type of
 sediment.
   Based on  the data obtained with a laboratory-type
 centrifuge    -3 and an industrial centrifuge HO    -325,
 we derived the dependence of the sediment dry matter
 retention efficiency on the centrifuging  index (Fig.  2),
 which is approximated by the expression:
                                                                 14
       12
    °. 10
    X
    4>
    •a
    Ofl

    'So
                                                              §   4
                                                                         10    20   30   40   50   60
                                                                     b - dry matter retention efficiency,
   The  use of  the centrifuging  index as a  criterion
enables  one  to  estimate  the  increase  in dry matter
retention  efficiency in preliminary treatment of sedi-
ments with chemical reagents, by  freezing and thawing,
heating, prolonged aeration, etc.
   Mechanically   dehydrated sediments  belong to  the
group of paste-like,  colloidal,  capillary-porous bodies
whose intensive drying involves  difficulties.
   Investigations  on  thermal drying of sediments  de-
hydrated  on  vacuum  filters, filter presses, and centri-
fuges show that  the drying curves have the same shape
for different types of sediment and differ only  in  the
position of the critical points, which mainly depends on
the initial water content of  the sediments (Fig.  3).
Sediments are dried in two stages, at a constant (period
I) and a reducing (period II) velocity.
               •I - U'i,
              - Mdiaut «t«» eont.nl  u,*,
       Fig. 3. Dr»l"?
                      of dahydratud *t&imm*
                                                      152

-------
   In the  first  stage the  drying  rate  depends on the
conditions of external mass- and heat-exchange between
the surface of the material and the drying agent. In the
second stage the drying rate depends on the conditions
of redistribution of humidity and heat inside the layer of
material.
   To avoid overdrying of the surface layer, the rate of
evaporation must  correspond  to the moisture diffusion
from the inside of the material.
   When intensive drying  regimes are  used, with high
velocities and temperatures of the  drying agent (which is
typical  of the  drying  of sediments in the suspended
state), the first drying  stage considerably reduces.  For
materials which dry like sediments with the formation of
a dry crust on the surface it is advisable to resume the
constant-drying-rate  stage  by  breaking the crust  and
thereby  exposing the  humid  surfaces.  This  kind of
regime is achieved by drying in gas suspension counter-
currents /4/.
   Treatment of experimental  data in criterial  depend-
ence Nuef =f(Re) shows that the  experimental data are
correlated by the  formula Nuef = 9.5 x lO'-'Re within
the  range 200  <  Re <500.
   To complete sediment  drying in the second stage it is
expedient to use the  air  fountain regime.

                     Conclusions

   1. The  main  factors characterizing  water  removal
from sewage  sediments  are the specific resistance of the
filtration  sediment,   the  centrifuging  index,  and  the
position of the first critical humidity point.
   2. Some relations are  recommended which make it
possible  to  select  the sediment treatment method  and
determine  the  degree  of  its  readiness for mechanical
dehydration  and also the  operating conditions  of the
filtering  devices according to the value of the  specific
resistance of the sediment, the  centrifuging index, and
the critical points of  the water-solid bond.
   3. The most efficient technique for thermal drying of
dehydrated  sewage  sediments  is the  method of gas
suspension counter-currents coupled with  the air foun-
tain regime.
REFERENCES

    1. I.S.  Turovsky.  Dehydration of  sewage  sediments  on
drum-type vacuum filters. Stroyizdat, 1966.
    2. I.S. Turovsky. Investigation into the Effect of Properties
of Sewage Sediments in the Course of Mechanical Dehydration
and Drying. Zhurnal prikladnoy khimii, V. XIV, 1972.
    3. R.Ya. Agranonik, I.S. Turovsky. Evaluation of Efficiency
of  Screw-type Centrifuges  in Treatment of  Seage Sediments.
Vodosnabzheniye i sanitarnaya tekhnika, 1970, No. 3.
    4. I.S.  Turovsky,  L.L. Goldfarb.  Investigation  into the
Parameters of Materials Drying in Gas Suspension Countercur-
rents. Inzhenerno-fizicheskii zhurnal, AN BSSR, V.XXIII, No. 4,
1972.
CAPTIONS TO FIGURES

Fig. 1  Curves  of  sediment drying  intensity:   1-com-
       pacted active silt; 2-fermented sediment; 3-unfer-
       mented sediment; c-lst critical humidity point;
       d-2nd critical humidity point; A-drying intensity,
       mg/min.cm  , B-humidity, %.
Fig. 2  Dependence of  dry matter retention efficiency
       on  centrifuging  index in sediment dehydration
       on  centrifuge  HOPP-325 with Q=3 - 4 m3/hr:
       a-centrifuging  index, cm3/g; b-dry matter reten-
       tion efficiency, %.
Fig. 3  Drying kinetics of dehydrated sediments:  a-sedi-
       ment  water content u,  %; b-drying time   T   ,
       min; c-drying  rate     du   s  % 5/min; d-u"cr;
       e-u'cr.                 d r
                                                      153

-------
                                                 PROTOCOL

                             of the second Meeting of the USA and USSR delegations
                             on  the problem of prevention of Water Pollution from
                             industrial and Municipal Sources
                                     (Cincinnati, USA, November 9-23, 1975)
   Between November 9-23 the Meeting of the USA-
USSR  delegations  on  the problem  of waste  water
treatment took place.
   The American delegation was led by Mr. Harold P.
Cahill,  Jr., Director of Municipal Construction Division,
US Environmental Protection Agency.
   The Soviet delegation was led by R.F. Slavolyubov,
Chief of the  Glavpromstroi Proyekt Department, Gos-
stroi USSR.
   The list of participants is attached in Appendix 1.

   In the course  of the  meeting  the  following  was
accomplished:
   1. A symposium on  physical-chemical treatment of
     waste waters.
   2. The accomplishments of the  1975  program of
     cooperation were discussed.
   3. Coordination of the Working Program for 1976.
                         I
   At the Symposium  16  reports devoted to the prob-
lems of physical-chemical waste water treatment were
delivered: the US delegation  delivered  9 reports: the
Soviet delegation 7 reports.
   The list of reports delivered is attached as Appendix
II.
   Of particular interest were papers by Soviet specialists
on new polyelectrolytes and on waste water treatment
from  concentrated oil and emulsion,  and  reports of
American specialists on   activated  carbon absorbtion
waste water  treatment and on physical-chemical with
utilization of coagulants.
   The  delegations have  agreed that  each  side  will
publish  all reports presented at the Symposium in the
necessary number of copies in  its own language prior to
May 1, 1976, and will distribute them among interested
organizations.
                         II
   Concerning the  results  of the  1975  program  of
cooperation, the following was noted:
   The  sides discussed  twice the  results  of current
research, exchanged scientific and  technical  literature
and  carried  out  two  US-USSR symposia on sludge
management  (USSR, Moscow,  May  1975)   and  on
physical-chemical  waste  water treatment (USA. Cin-
cinnati, November 1975).
                         HI
   The  delegations  determined and  coordinated the
program of cooperation for 1976 (Appendix III).
   The sides will yearly execute exchange of information
about  the  course  of the  work. The  questions of the
exchange of results will be  decided for each separate case
in conformity with the existing agreements between the
USA and the USSR in this  field.
   For the preparation of the forthcoming Symposium
"Intensification  of  Biochemical  Methods  of  Waste
Waters Treatment" (USSR, Moscow, May 12-26, 1976),
the following was agreed upon:

   •  each  side will present 5-6 reports to the Sympos-
      ium;
   •  the sides will exchange the report  titles prior  to
      February 1, 1976;
   •  the texts of the reports shall be  exchanged in two
      copies in Russian and  English, prior  to April 15,
      1976;

   Both sides noted that organization work for carrying
out the Sumposium "Waste Water Treatment — Physical-
Mecahnical  Treatment  Facilities" to be planned for
September  1976 in the USA will be considered in the
course of delegations meeting in May 1976.
   Paying great attention to increasing the efficiency  of
cooperation, the  delegations consider it advisable  to
carry out in the future long-term exchange of specialists
on  various problems  of waste  water  and sludge  treat-
ment.
   The delegations  agreed to  carry  out  a long-term
exchange of specialists during  1977:

   •  of Soviet specialists  in the US on the  problem  of
      the  use of technical oxygen  in biological  treat-
      ment, and
   •  of  American  specialists  in the USSR  on the
      problems of  biological treatment  plants'  oper-
      ations.

   The detailed exchange  program will  be  agreed five
months prior to the date of the participants' departure.
This exchange will be carried out on the  basis of equal
and "receiving-side-pays" basis.
   In  the course of  this  visit to the US  the  Soviet
delegation  visited water treatment plants in or around
the cities of Norfolk, Philadelphia, Harrisburg, and Erie,
                                                     154

-------
the Taft Scientific Research Institute and the Cyanamid
Company.
   Both sides  expressed  their  satisfaction  that the
meeting was conducted in an atmosphere of friendship
and in a spirit of mutual understanding,  thus contribut-
ing to  the  further development and strengthening of
cooperation in the field of environmental protection.
   This protocol  was signed  on November 21, 1975, in
Washington, D.C. in two copies, in  English and Russian,
both texts being equally authentic.

From the Soviet Side                 From the US Side
R. Slavolyubov                        Harold P. Cahill, Jr.
Chief of Delegation                     Chief of Delegation
                                                     155

-------
                                             APPENDIX I
LIST OF SOVIET PARTICIPANTS

 1.  R. Slavolyubov


 2.  V. Ponomarev

 3.  I. Myasnikov

 4.  A. Belevtsev

 5.  I. Maksinmenko



 6.  M. Levchenko

LIST OF AMERICAN PARTICIPANTS

 1.  Harold P. Cahill, Jr.


 2.  A. Breidenbach


 3.  A. Paretti

 4.  Jesse M. Cohen

 5.  Walter J. Weber

 6.  Russell Gulp

 7.  Robert Polta

 8.  A. Cywin

 9.  I. Gellman

10 R, Dunlap

11.  A. Marek

12.  F. Sebastian
Chief  of  the  Department,  GLAVPROMSTROYPROEKT,
GOSSTROY, USSR Chairman of the USSR Delegation

Head of the Laboratory, VNII VODGEO, GOSSTROY, USSR

Head of the Sector, VNII VODGEO GOSSTROY, USSR

Senior Researcher, VNII VODGEO GOSSTROY, USSR

Senior  Researcher, Interdepartmental Environmental Protec-
tion Council of State Committee of Scientific and Technical
Affairs

Deputy Manager, Trust "ORGCHIM" MINCHIMPROM
Chairman of the U.S. Delegation, Director Municipal Construc-
tion Division, US EPA Washington, D.C.

Assistant  Administrator for  Water  and  Hazardous Materials,
EPA, Washington, D.C.

Consultant, Water Programs, EPA, Washington, D.C.

U.S. EPA, Cincinatti, Ohio

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Gulp, Wesner & Gulp, El Dorado Hills, California

Metropolitan Waste Control  Commission St. Paul, Minnesota

Director, Effluent Guidelines, EPA Washington, D.C.

NCASI, Pulp and Paper Industry, New York New York

Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa.

American Cyanamid, Bound Brook, New  Jersey

ENVIROTECH, Menlo Park, California
                                                156

-------
                                            APPENDIX II
LIST  OF  REPORTS PRESENTED AT  THE  USSR-US  SYMPOSIUM  "WASTE  WATER TREATMENT -
PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES"

FROM THE USSR

 1. Levchenko, M, N. "Treatment of Waste Water from Chemical Plants"

 2. Myasnikov, I.N., Gandurina, L.V., Butzeva,  L.N.  "Studies on  Waste  Water  Treatment with Flocculants
   Application"

 3. Korshak, V.V.,  Zubakova, L.B., Gandurina, L.B., "Synthesis  of  Cationic Polyelectrolytes for Treatment of
   Natural and Waste Waters"

 4. Myasnikov, I.N., Balakin, B.A. "The  Removal of Volatile Suspended Solids from Waste Waters"

 5. Belevtsev, A.N., Maksinmenko, Yu. L. "Studies on Oxidation Processes of Cianides and Phenols in Waste and
   Natural Waters by Using Chlorine Dioxide"

 6. Panova,   V.A.,  Goriatchev,  N.S.,  Lurie, U.U.  "Examination of  Oil-Containing Waste Waters  Chemical
   Composition after their Treatment in Aeration Tanks"

 7. Ponomarev, V.G., Zakharina,  S.B. "Treatment of Concentrated Waste Water Containing Oil Emulsions"


FROM THE US

 1. Cohen, Jesse M. "An Overview of Physical-Chemical Treatment"

 2. Weber, Walter  J. "The Role of Activated Carbon in Physical-Chemical Treatment"

 3. Gulp, Russell "Design of Facilities for Physical-Treatment of Raw Wastewater"

 4. Polta, Robert "The Operation of the Physical-Chemical Treatment Plant at Rosemount, Minnesota"

 5. Lacy, William, Cywin, Allen "Physical-Chemical Treatment of Waste Waters from the Petroleum Refining-
   Petrochemical Industries"

 6. Gellman, Isaiah "Current Status and Directions of Development of Physical-Chemical Effluent in the Paper
   Industry"

 7. Dunlap, Robert, McMichael, Francis  "Dilemma of Coke Wastewater Disposal"

 8. Marek, Anton, Askins, William "Advanced Wastewater Treatment for an Organic Manufacturing Complex"

 9. Sebastian, Frank "Cost Benefits of Physical-Chemical  Treatment"
                                                 157

-------
                                                    APPENDIX III

 PROGRAM
 USSR-USA COOPERATION Of WORKING GROUP ON PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION
 FROM INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL SOURCES
.No
Title
                         Responible for
Form of Work          From the    From the    Time
                       USSR       USA
                                                                                                  Expected Result
  I  Modernization of existing and
    development of new combined
    facilities with high efficiency
    for wastewater treatment,
    including hydrocyclones, mul-
    tistage settlers, flotators,
    facilities for usage of technical
    oxygen, investigations of usage
    of flocculants and coagulants
     Development of hydrocyclones
     and flotation facilities;
     scheme of usage of coagulants

  -  Development of tubular and
     plate settlers and facilities
     for usage of technical oxygen;
     scheme of usage of flocculants.

  2.  Intensification of wastewater
     process in petrochemical,
     chemical, petroleum refining,
     pulp and paper, and metallurgical
     industries.
     Intensification of wastewater
     treatment process in metallur-
     gical and petroluem-refining
     industries
                       Joint development of
                       themes, scientific
                       information and
                       specialists
                       delegation exchange

                       Symposium on
                       "Improvement of
                       Biochemical waste
                       water treatment
                       methods" (USSR,
                       May, 1976, 16 days,
                       7 specialists)

                       Symposium on theme;
                       "Wastewater treatment
                       Physical-Mechanical
                       Treatment Facilities"
                       (USA, September. 1976
                       16 days, 7 specialists)
                     VNII VODGEO
                     GOSSTROY
                     USSR
EPA  Through 1978
                       Information and dele-
                       gation exchange
                       Information and
                       delegation exchange
                                              VNII VODGEO
                                              Gosstroy
                                              USSR
                     VNII VODGEO
                     GOSSTROY
                     USSR
                                      EPA
EPA  Through 1978
                                              VNII VODGEO
                                              GOSSTROY
                                              USSR
Improvement of
the efficiency
of existing
and development
of new treat-
ment facilities
reduction of
space for loc-
tion, reduction
of reagents as
cost price of
waste water
treatment
Increasing of
wastewater
treatment ef-
ficiency
introduction of
new treatment
schemes, maxi-
mize usage of
treated waters
in recircula-
tion
    Intensification of wastewater
    treatment process in petrochemical
    and pulp and paper industries.
                                                               EPA
                                                        158

-------
PROGRAM
USSR-USA COOPERATION Op WORKING GROUP ON PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION
FROM INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL SOURCES
                                                             Responible for
No           Title                 Form of Work          From the   From the   Time           Expected Result
                                                            USSR     USA
3. Development of highly efficient
   methods and facilities for re-
   moval of nutrients and treatment
   of municipal wastewaters
Development of methods and
facilities for removal of
nutrients and treatment of
municipal wastewaters.

Usage of treated water in
recycling systems at
industrial plants.

Treatment of wastewater
sludges.
   Stabilization and dewatering
   of wastewater sludges
Joint development
of themes, informa-
tionand delegation
exchange
                                                       VNII VODGEO
                                                       GOSSTROY
                                                       USSR
EPA  1977
                                                          VNII VODGEO
                                                          GOSSTROY
                                                          USSR
                                                                                EPA
                                   Information and
                                   delegation
                                   exchange.
                       VNII VODGEO
                       GOSSTROY
                       USSR
Development of
new treatment
facilities for
prevention of
water basin
entrophication
and development
of new treat-
ment systems
with the maxi-
mum usage of
treated water
in recircula-
tion at indus-
trial plants.
                                                               Reduction of
                                                               cost price of
                                                               waste water
                                                               sludge treat-
                                                               ment increasing
                                                               of treatment
                                                               facilities
                                                               efficiency.
   Technology and facilities for
   utilization and treatment of
   wastewater sludges.
                                                                                EPA
5. Exchange of two Soviet specia-
   lists for 4 months in US on
   the problems of usage of
   technical oxygen at bio-
   logical waste water treatment
   plants.

   Exchange of two American
   specialists for 4 months
   m the USSR on the problem
   of biological industrial and
   municipal waste water treatment
   plants.
Study of research
work of American
companies and
organizations,
participation in
scientific studies

Acquaintance with
research work of
the Soviet organiza-
tions and institutes,
participation in
scientific studies.
                                                                             II Quarter
                                                                             1977
                                                                              III Quarter
                                                                              1977
                       Studying of
                       the US
                       experience in
                       the field of
                       waste water
                       treatment.

                       Studying of the
                       USSR experience
                       in the field of
                       waste water
                       treatment.
                                                        159

-------

-------

                           USA-USSR
                          WORKING GROUP
                          ON THE PREVENTION OF
                          WATER POLLUTION
                         FROM MUNICIPAL AND
                        INDUSTRIAL SOURCES

                       NOVEMBER 1975
  SYMPOSIUM ON
 PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TREATMENT
FROM MUNICIPAL AND
INDUSTRIAL SOURCES

 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

-------

-------
                                                                      LU
                  OS  «

                  kU  CO

                  3»  CD
                                       z:

                                       a-
                                  cs   es
                                                  mm*



                                                  I
cs  z:
ca  c=

cs  ^


ej  CD
                                                   eg
                                                       2    '
                                                   -  — - 1

«w   CS
GC   ^M.
                                     zz



                                     CO
                                     CO
                                                                       t "




                                                                       Cnr?

                                                                       C»^<
   us

-------

-------
                                -4-
                  x
                  to
                  
 »>ii »;))?)>' • \

 -• < « |U!!\
 < — umm-A
 2r D »-(^»)>>V
 •J uu _j)))'' >' y"5
 o «r —) n ' i)'/
i1-1 5 u.)>'"'/
)»;> i?1/.");' v.'/
^>
                                               .
                                                co
0oS
U eQ »—
t— Oi V>

  < >•
                                                       U
         v>
CM
CD
    u
    51  ^
    >-  u.
    •-  o
                                                 co
                      •N
                        I



                       t
                       UJ
                                                       LU


                                                       O
                 1S
                 Z ui

                 IS
                 J<
                 UJ UL>
                 0£ Qi
                 a. K-
                           o^xfii
                           )OO- — m>
                           n; «-r «r •! i ii
         •3
         U
         U

         O
         _i
         u-
                      Z
                      <


-------

-------
            ~L^ DRAFT FAN
              *v^

            OT-TTI
  DUST COLLECTOR
                           GAS OUTLET
     CARBON DISCHARGE




     QUENCH TANK-
            STEAM
AIR LOCK FEEDER
  COMBUSTION

  AIR BLOWER
                                   FURNACE

                                    DRIVE
FIG, 6 -  MULT3PLE - HEARTH  REGENERATION  FURNACE

-------

-------
                                                   CCD
                                                     o • j.v
Figure I.  SelationsLip betv;oen the  sev:ass  treatac-nt
           rate  ocJ. the flocculant r.olcc.iiar v/eight
           H3S-II
    I; 2 - rattling
    1} 2' -  flotation

-------

-------
Pigure 2,  Suspended solids content of ballast sewage
           after settling depending on the flocculant dose:
           I - BA - 102;    2 - EA - 212;    3 - ESI;
           4 - BA - 112;
           6 - FIB
5 - EPS - II (Mol.woisiit=726000);

-------

-------
fBO
O      2
Figure 3
               Relationship listvreen. the settlirig. efficiency
               of the ballast COD scwago and the flocculant dose;
               I -  ??A;    2-EEB-II (Molecular 7/eiskl; =726.000);
               3 -  PEI,    4  -  BA - 112;    5 --.BA - 102;
               6 -  BA •- 212.

-------

-------
X
                                CO

                                o
                   en
                  C.
                  o
           ra
           i_
  -*C     C OJ
   c:     o c
   ra  oit— oj
  t—  c  •»-> o>
     ••-  iO CJ
   en i-  i- ex:
   c   -^ 4->  c CJ
»- -o  o  cj en
Or-  X  CTC       >>
•*•> O  O  Ol ra    I/I J-
ra :n o  e£ jc    •— O
C         O  «/l «0 **
t-aja>c;xs-U(O
t- CDCnOUJQJ^- i-
o-d -a JD     5 E o
f— r3=JJ-COOJJ3
JT^-r-  «0  Or—J= 10
cjcococ_>«-_i
                                 UJ
       O» O r— CJ
                        in vo
           U  OJ
           S-  S.
          0
                      tn
   <,rt
   CJ
   O
   O
            r3 3    US «/>
            J-i—    U C
    •*->-4J«/ioO«/)OE
    u o  i- -M <_> i_ *j 5
    tC eg  <1) CO    O» CO r—
 E •*-» 4->  -M    C *J    O
 OCC^-t-O^-J-0
 O O O->- <1J JD •»- 
 J-f— i—  O  CJ -«
                               Q>
                               en
                               (O
                               u
                               X
                 ro
                      in 10 r- oo
                                                                                            I±j.
                                                                                                                           O
                                                                                                                           2-
                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                  o

-------

-------
i;   .£
                                                                                                     or

                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                      CO


                                                                                                      Q
                                                                                                      LU
                                                                                                      Q
                                                                                                      O-

                                                                                                      ra
                                                                                                      v.
       «=   *•*  >   .»
       O   -r  f  -f
       J=   -o /    /
       Li   -O /   /
                                                                                           O
                                                                                          -o
                                                                                          CQ

                                                                                          Ol
                                                                                          C7>
                                                                                          •o
                                                                                          3
.c
o   TD
     >
 u
 QJ
cs:

-------

-------
                                   O
                                   a:
TJ
 (V
 to
 5-
 O



CO
                                                                             CL



                                                                             O.
                                                                             
-------

-------
                                                                                                 r.
                                                                                                 rj
                                                                                                 V.
                                        •o
                                         o
                                         s_
                                         OJ
                                         c
                                         cu
                                         C7>
                                         o
                                                  c
                                                  o
i-

CJ
          c
          rs
          a
          en
                                                                                                   re
                                                                                                  3:
i_
o
                                                                                                                         CO
                                                                                                                         >-
                                                                                                                         on
                                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                                          ca
                                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                                          LU

                                                                                                                          <:
                                                                                                                                       a
                                                                                                                                       $-
                                                                                                                                       cr
                                                                                                                                         C
                                                                                                                                         3
                                                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                                         rr

-------

-------

-------
USA-USSR SYMPOSIUM ON PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TREATMENT FROM
                MUNICIPAL  AND INDUSTRIAL SOURCES
                               ADDENDA

             Figures omitted from the text are attached. They are:

                          Page 4, Figures 1  and 2.
                          Page 8, Figure 6.
                          Page 9, Figure 7.
                          Page 16, Figure 1.
                          Page 17, Figures 2 and  3.
                          Page 20, Figure 1.
                          Page 21, Figure 2.
                          Page 24, Figure 5.
                          Page 25, Figure 6.

-------
  USA-USSR Working Group
             on the
 Prevention of Water Pollution
              from
Municipal and Industrial Sources
          Symposium on
  Physical-Chemical Treatment
              from
Municipal and Industrial Sources
           Taft Center
         Cincinnati, Ohio
       November 12-14,1975
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Region V, Library
      230 South Dearborn Street
      Chicago, Illinois 60604

-------
                                 PREFACE
   The second cooperative USA/USSR symposium on the physical-chemical treatment of waste
waters from municipal and industrial sources was held in Cincinnati, Ohio at the Taft Center
from November  12 through November  14, 1975.  This symposium was conducted in accord
with the protocol of the Fourth  Session  of the  Joint USA/USSR Commission  held in
Washington, B.C. from October 28-31, 1975.
   This symposium was sponsored under the auspices of the Working Group on the Prevention
of Water Pollution from Municipal and Industrial Sources. The United States delegation was
headed by Harold P. Cahiil of the United States Environmental  Protection Agency  and the
Soviet delegation was headed by R. F. Slavolyubov of the Department of Gosstroi in the Soviet
Union.
   The sixteen papers that were presented at the  symposium (nine US and seven USSR) are
reprinted in English in this volume. The two papers presented in Moscow in  May of 1975 by the
Soviets that were never bound in the previous volume are included as an appendix.
   This volume is reprinted in English in accord with the protocol signed  by the  delegation
leaders on November 21, 1975 in Washington, D.C.
                      U,S. Environmental Protection  Agency
                                           11

-------
                                  INDEX
Press Release	v

Opening Address - Dr. Andrew W. Breidenbach	1

Papers Presented at the USA/USSR SYMPOSIUM

 1.  Cohen, Jesse M. and Westrick, James J. (US EPA), "Overview of Physical-Chemical
     Treatment"  	4

 2.  Maysnikov,  I.N.,  Gandurina,  L.V.  and  Butzeva,  L.N.  (Vodgeo),  "Studies  on
      Wastewater Treatment with Flocculants Application"	14

 3.  Polta,  Robert (Metropolitan Waste  Control Commission, Twin Cities Area), "The
     Operation of the Physical-Chemical Treatment Plant at Rosemount, Minnesota"   . .  .20

 4.  Levchenko, M.N. (orgchim), "Treatment of Chemical Plant Effluents"	31

 5.  Weber, Walter J.  Jr. (University of Minnesota), "The Role of Activated  Carbon in
     Physiochemical Treatment"	35

 6.  Miasnikov, I.N., Balakin, B.A. (Vodgeo), "The Removal of Volatile Suspended Solids
     from Wastewaters"  	50

 7.  Gulp, George L. (Gulp, Wesner and Gulp), "Design of Facilities for Physical-Chemical
     Treatment of Raw Wastewater"   	58

 8.  Korshak, V.V., Zubakova, L.B., Gandurina, L.B., Mendeleev, D.I. (Moscow Chemistry
     Technological Institute),  "Synthesis of Cationic Poly electrolytes for Treatment of
     Natural and Waste Waters "  	76

 9.  Lacy, William, J.  and Cywin, Allen  (US  EPA),  "Physical-Chemical Treatment of
      Wastewaters from the Petroleum Refining-Petrochemical Industry "  	81

10.  Panova,  V.A., Goriatchev,  N.S.,  and  Lurie,  U.U.  (Vodgeo) "Examination of
     Oil-Containing Waste Waters Chemical Composition after their Treatment in Aeration
     Tanks"	90

11.  Dunlap,  Robert  W.  and  McMichael, Francis Clay  (Professors,  Carnegie-Mellon
     University), "Comparison  of Alternative Strategies for Coke Plant Wastewater
     Disposal"	96

12.  Belevtzev, A.N., and Maixmenko, Ju.L. (State Committee of Scientific and Technical
     Affairs)  "Studies on  Oxidation  Processes of Cyanides and Phenols in  Waste and
     Natural Waters by Using Chlorine Dioxide"	.105

13.  Gellman,  Dr.  Isaiah (National Council of  the  Paper  Industry for Air and Stream
     Improvement), "Current  Status and Directions  of  Physical-Chemical Effluent
     Treatment in the Paper Industry "  	111
                                         11 I

-------
14.   Ponomarev, V.G. and  Zakharina, S.B. (Vodgeo), Treatment of Concentrated Waste
     Waters Containing Oil Emulsions"  	120

15.   Markek, Anton C. and Askins, William (American Cyanamid), "Advanced Wastewater
     Treatment for an Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Complex"	124

16.   Sebastian, Frank P. (Envirotech), "Cost Benefits of Physical-Chemical Treatment"  .  .136

     Papers submitted late  from May symposium in  USSR

17.   Ostrovsky,  O.P., Souproun,  U.M., Reznikov, U.N. (VNIPI Chermetenergoochistka)
     "Processing and Neutralization of Industrial Wastes from Iron and Steel
     Effluents Treatment"	.144

18.   Lukinykh, N.A. and Turovsky, I.S. (Moscow City Water Supply and Treatment),
     "Fundamental Principles of Selecting the Methods for Processing Sewage
     Sediments in Accordance with their Properties"'	150


Protocol	154

Appendix I  Participants	156

Appendix II  Reports	157

Appendix III  Program	158
                                             IV

-------
JOINT US/USSR SYMPOSIUM
ON PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TREATMENT
AND  US TOUR
NOVEMBER 9  - NOVEMBER 23

   The U. S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency is hosting a joint US-USSR Symposium on
Physical-Chemical Treatment the week of November 12-14, 1975 at the Robert Taft Research
in Cincinnati, Ohio.  The Symposium is being held under the auspices of the Joint US/USSR
Bilaterial Environmental Agreement  signed  in the fall of 1972  by Presidents  Nixon and
Podgorny. As part of their activities in the Cincinnati area, the Soviets will be escorted through
the new facilities (Environmental  Research Laboratory) located at 26 Sinclair Street.
   The program for the  Symposium will include 9 papers on Physical/Chemical Treatment for
the U.S. side and 7 papers from the Soviet side.
   In  conjunction with  the Symposium,  a tour has been arranged for the 6 Soviets of several
East  Coast wastewater treatment facilities. The tour begins on Saturday, November 15 with
visits planned for the Lamberts Point and Chesapeake-Elizabeth plants located in the Norfolk
area. Monday, November 17, the  Soviets  will visit the Williamsburg Treatment Plant. The
Soviets will visit several plants in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania area before leaving for the Soviet
Union on November 23, 1975.

-------

-------
 Improving The Climate for Our International Environment
A SPEECH BY DR. ANDREW BREIDENBACH, ACTING ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR
FOR WATER AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS,
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
TO THE US/USSR SYMPOSIUM
ON PHYSICAL CHEMICAL TREATMENT,
CINCINNATI, OHIO

NOVEMBER 12-14, 1975
INTRODUCTION

   I  am  glad to  be here  today to speak before  this
distinguished bilateral group which is concerned with
bringing about environmental improvement.
   Both the Soviet and United States goals are similar in
our large scale national efforts to clean up lakes, streams,
and coastal waters, and the water that we drink. Both of
our  nations have  had long periods  of history when
economic growth received  such concentrated attention
that the equivalent need to maintain a healthy environ-
ment was often overlooked  and neglected.
   I am happy to say that attention to the environment
has taken a healthy turn for the better in each of our
countries. The work of this group is dramatic evidence
of this fact, and I wish you all success in your efforts.
Already,  the  interchange   of  information  and visits
between  the  USSR  and US participants have led to
worthwhile results.  Each country has its own area of
outstanding  expertise in environmental improvement
that  we can share to our mutual benefit. Each country
has developed leads in technologies for water pollution
abatement  that  would  have taken a long time  and
significant expense to match if the information were not
to be inter-communicated.
   Jointly, we have been determining where each of our
nations stand in  controlling the major industries manu-
facturing iron and steel, pulp and paper, chemicals and
petroleum refining where the major part of our indus-
trial pollution occurs. And  we can begin identifying the
specific  areas of pollution  abatement technology that
would  provide   the  most  benefit to  our respective
nations, so we can concentrate our attention efficiently.
   In municipal wastewater treatment control, we have
passed   this  stage   and   have   begun  to  exchange
information  on  control methodologies that  are most
beneficial. Municipal treatment, of course, is where our
citizens  become  even more directly  involved  in  our
efforts  and where the costs are directly borne through
local, state and federal bonding and tax revenues.
   While on this subject, I am happy to note that citizen
support  for our  environmental improvement  measures
has continued at a high level.
SUPPORT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT

   Certainly, it  is true that  progress in improving the
environment cannot be sustained without the heartfelt
support of the citizens in each of our countries.  I am
greatly encouraged by the fact that  the United States'
program has been characterized by consistent, sustained
public  support for environmental goals and efforts to
achieve those goals.
   As you  may  know, one of the methods we use to
determine the desires and opinions of our citizens is the
polling of public opinion where we go out to segments
of the  public and sample and record the  response. On
the issue  of the impact  and cost of environmental
controls, all along,  public opinion polls have demon-
strated  considerable  support  for  our environmental
programs—even during the recent period of recession and
rising prices. I am most heartened by the fact that this
support has not been fickle. In fact, a survey by a major
opinion research  firm in August showed that 60% of the
public believe it  is more important to pay the costs to
clean up the environment than it is  to keep prices and
taxes down. And 90% say that if the environment is not
cleaned up now, it will cost more in the long run.
   To me this is a dramatic public endorsement of our
efforts. I am happy  to say that President Ford has  given
high priority  to the  environmental  effort and has
repeatedly  supported requests for increased manpower
and funding. The Congress has also consistently acted to
indicate its support. And the States and  local govern-
ments have joined in the national efforts with their own
funds and programs.
GOALS

   The specific goals of the United States program are
swimmable  and  fishable waters by  1983 and no  dis-
charge of pollutants by  1985. The U.S. Congress has had
the National Commission on Water Quality working on
the feasibility of these goals over the last two years and
we  will shortly  be receiving the final  report  of the
Commission. Presently,  the draft report of the Commis-

-------
sion's staff answers the question  as to whether or not
achieving  the goals of  our Federal Water Pollution
Control Act  of 1972 will  be too  expensive  for the
economy of the United States.
   The  staff  report found  that  the  "impacts of the
projected expenditures on water pollution abatement on
the general economy—GNP growth rate,  general price
level, interest rates, etc.—are not significant."
   In an analysis of the price impact of PL 92-500, the
report found that the  annual  price increase, at an
average, would be  3/10 of one  percent—a very  small
price, indeed, to pay for cleaner water.
   And it must  be  remembered  that  the municipal
wastewater   treatment  construction  grant  program,
amounting to  $18 billion,  is creating more jobs, with
some  125,000 on-site and  off-site jobs having already
been  created  as  a result  of the construction grant
program. That figure is expected to rise to 200,000 by
the  end of fiscal  year 1977. The multiplier effect in
other sectors of the economy will considerably augment
that figure.

EVIDENCE OF IMPROVEMENT

   It is well to recognize that the kind of tangible results
we hope and expect to see resulting from PL 92-500 will
not  show up overnight. We are, in a sense, in mid-stream
in  this effort. The  enormity  of the  task  was  not
anticipated either by  the Congress or by the agency, and
we will require the dedication of more resources in funds
and people to the achievement of the goals.
   Meanwhile, we  can take heart  at the successes we are
beginning to record in this effort, all across the nation.
We are moving, and we are moving in the right direction.
   Just a  decade  ago, Lake Erie  in our great lakes had
been  given  up for  "dead"  by biologists.  And  the
Escambia Bay in  Florida faced a similar prognosis. In
both cases, federal, state and local efforts have dramat-
ically  revived both bodies of water to the point where
fish life-and some species not seen for many years-not
only survives but is thriving.
   In these and many other areas individuals are enjoy-
ing  once  again the pleasures of  cleaner water and the
success of the water clean-up effort is being recorded.
   Over 97%  of all water discharges  are either now in
compliance with pollution control standards or are on
definite water clean-up schedules-with these require-
ments backed up  by strong penalties for  violations.
Among this number are almost all of our big industries.
   Over 4,000 individual municipal  wastewater  treat-
ment projects are now underway—and improvements in
the  administration  of the  construction grants program
will move  these and other new  projects to successful
completion.
   We are, in effect, winning the first round in the fight
to end water pollution.
FUTURE EFFORTS

   The next round will be much more difficult and more
costly-because it will deal with pollution from sources
that will require not  only  the application of enormous
resources, but also  the application of technologies that
are still being developed and are not often available.
   In our  construction  grants  program  for building
treatment facilities for urban wastewaters, it is estimated
that only  50%, or some  9,000 of 18,000 municipal
treatment plants, will  provide by  1977/78 the necessary
quality  of treatment. Moreover, these 9,000   plants
represent less than 40% of the 1977 population because
the  larger  cities  will not  have completed necessary
construction by that  time. Our figures  indicate  that it
will  take  over $46 billion to raise treatment   up  to
secondary,  or higher, where required by water quality
standards.

   In the case of industry it is tentatively estimated by
the National Water Quality Commission that it will take
somewhere between $59.6 billion and $174.8 billion to
eliminate  pollution from industry   sources. These are
preliminary figures, however, and they appear to  be on
the high side.
   Also,  while on this  subject, we  are   particularly
concerned  about the  problem of eliminating toxic and
hazardous industrial effluents from wastewaters that are
discharged  directly  into  our waters or which go into
municipal treatment systems which  are not prepared to
treat these special discharges. It will require a complex
and  innovative effort to develop the  necessary tech-
nologies to treat industrial wastes in many cases.

   As  part of our  control effort  for instance,  our
guidelines  for pretreatment standards, which are being
developed, will be  presenting  information on  those
chemicals that would inhibit the treatment plant pro-
cesses. This approach would allow  the  individual plant
manager to set the criteria for influents into his plant to
prohibit any chemical, or level of chemicals, that  would
damage his plant operations.
   The development  of more and more new industrial
chemicals makes this  task of protecting our environment
and public health more and more difficult. Fortunately,
this group gathered here today will help to make the
task more easily and quickly accomplished. The problem
of industrial wastes and  the  special needs of treatment
are common to both  of our countries. The progress that
we make exchanging ideas and innovations will reinforce
pollution abatement progress not only for our nations—
but  for all nations on our earth. I see by the agenda that
the  variety of important subjects and  topics  to  be
discussed   should  significantly  contribute  to further
progress  and achievements, and I am pleased to express
the appreciation of the United States for the participa-
tion of our Soviet colleagues.

-------
THE CINCINNATI CENTER

   One final thought before concluding, EPA is heavily
committed to research efforts in the  field of water
pollution abatement. And health effects research is one
area that  will be receiving increased  emphasis.  I am
happy  to  have been a party to these activities and to
have worked to build the new laboratory center, here in
Cincinnati, which you have toured. Although not quite
finished,  it was  dedicated  by President Ford and Mr.
Train, our EPA Administrator, during the past summer.
   Already, research conducted in Cincinnati has shown
us  how to prevent the growth  of  algae by removing
wastewater nutrients; clean up oil spills; and produce
safe drinking water, among other discoveries. And we
have extended the  improvements through EPA's tech-
nical assistance programs, to communities and states all
across America.
   We  hope  these  and the  future improvements we
expect  to develop  in wastwater  treatment will  be
similarly beneficial to the Soviet  citizens. I  assure you
we will effectively employ advances in research due to
the Soviet efforts,  and  while  we continue these ex-
changes,  I am mindful we are not  only  eliminating
wasteful duplication of effort but communicating the
benefits  of our different  approaches to  improving
abatement controls and furthering the cause of coopera-
tion for environmental improvement  throughout the
world.

   Thank you.

-------
Overview of Physical—Chemical Treatment

Jesse M. Cohen*
James J. Westrick

INTRODUCTION
   A little more than a decade of research has resulted in
significant  changes  in  the  technology  of  treating
municipal  wastewater.  The  design  engineer now has
process alternatives not available to him  in the  past.
These  processes, based largely  on  physical-chemical
principles, have the capability of  treating a wide^variety
of wastewaters to produce effluents ranging in quality
from  "secondary"  as  defined  by EPA  to that which
would meet the most stringent state requirements. These
processes, in  conjunction with biological processes,  are
increasingly being used to  produce effluents  that  are
suitable for reuse, including use as a source for potable
water.
   The  treatment system  which is most  advanced in
development  is the series of unit  processes  illustrated in
Fig.  1  (1,2).  Following conventional pretreatment such
as bar screening and grit  removal,  the raw sewage is
treated  with a  metal coagulant  or  precipitant  which
effectively  removes  suspended  and colloidal solids  as
well as phosphates. This unit process also removes most,
but not all, metals.  Filtration through granular media,
optionally   located   either  before   or  after  carbon
adsorption,  further reduces  suspended solids. In some

-------
plant designs the filtration  step is  omitted, and the
downflow carbon contactors  serve the dual purposes of
filtration and adsorption.
   The  fully clarified effluent from chemical treatment
is  contacted with  activated  carbon which removes
dissolved organic  matter. Where required, disinfection,
usually  with chlorine, completes the treatment system.
When the carbon has been exhausted and can no longer
produce the  desired effluent  quality, it is removed from
the  contactor   and  thermally  regenerated.  Sludges
produced during chemical clarification are processed for
disposal.

CHEMICAL CLARIFICATION

Clarification  Equipment

   Chemical   clarification   is   the   initial   series   of
operations in a  physical-chemical system. The processes
are  essentially the same  as  those traditionally used in
water treatment practice. A common flow scheme for
clarification   is  shown  in   Fig.  2.  Chemicals  and
wastewater  are  mixed in  a rapid  mix  basin which
provides about  one minute  detention at average flow.
Mechanical   mixing is  preferred to  ensure complete
dispersion of the chemical in the wastewater. From the
rapid mix basin the coagulated wastewater then flows to
a gently stirred  basin where it is retained for 10-15 min
to  allow the  particles to  collide, adhere and grow to a
settleable size. Slow paddle  mixers are commonly used
for  this  application.  The  flocculated  water  is then
directed to a clarifier where quiescent conditions permit
the  solids to settle out. In many cases, it is advantageous
to recycle settled  sludge to the rapid mix basin in order
to   assist in precipitation  and  floe formation.  The
remaining  sludge  is  withdrawn for  dewatering and
disposal.

Chemicals for Clarification

   Several   chemicals   may   be  used  alone   or   in
combination  for  wastewater clarification.  These  are
listed in Table 1 and include lime at various  pH's (3,4),
salts of iron and aluminum  (5), and organic polymers.
The choice  of the chemical  to  use  depends on  several
factors listed in Table 2. All factors are ultimately based
on   optimizing process economics to  reach a desired
water quality (6).
   The  chemistry of coagulation-flocculation has been
extensively described in the literature (7). Typical results
of these reactions can be illustrated by a description  of
ferric chloride treatment of raw wastewater shown  in
Fig. 3 (5). Increasing dosage of ferric chloride, expressed
in the illustration  as Fe^ + ,  results in precipitation  of
phosphorus  as ferric phosphate. Here, the optimum dose
for  phosphorus precipitation was about  60  mg/1  of
     1". Concurrently, ferric hydroxide is formed which
coagulates  and flocculates the  suspended and colloidal
solids.   Minimum  residual  turbidity  obtained  here
coincided with the optimum for phosphorus removal at
a dose  of  60 mg/1.  Since  the chemical hydrolysis of
ferric  chloride  consumes  an  equivalent  amount  of
alkalinity, pH of the effluent will decrease, depending on
the  buffering  capacity   of the  wastewater.  In  this
instance, pH decreased  from about  7.8 to  6.5  at
optimum iron  dosage.  In  addition to suspended  and
colloidal solids  flocculation, chemical treatment also
removes 20-35  percent  of dissolved  organic  matter
expressed here as soluble COD.
   Since each wastewater  is unique in its chemistry,  the
exact dosage of chemical required must be determined
for each wastewater.  This determination can readily be
made by appropriate jar  tests  of all chemical options.
After the dosage has been  determined, then other factors
such as cost of chemical and sludge disposal, can be
considered  for the final choice of chemical.
   Use of iron or aluminum salts results in a change in
composition  of total dissolved  solids.  Depending  on
dosage, some 50-100 mg/1 of additional chloride or
sulfate  ion occurs in the effluent, while 20-30 mg/1
phosphate  ion and 50-100  mg/1  of carbon dioxide  are
removed, thus resulting  in  little or no net increase in
total  dissolved  solids. Lime, on  the  other hand, can
result in lowered total dissolved solids through softening
reactions that reduce calcium and  magnesium  content.

                        FIG, 3
     FeC!3 TREATMENT  OF RAW  WASTEWATER
    30
 a
 O
 u
            25     SO     75     100     125

         Ferric Chloride Dosage, mg/i c. s ,- ^ ' J

-------
TABLE   1.    CHOICE    OF   CHEMICALS   FOR
CLARIFICATION

1.    Ferric Chloride
2.    Ferrous Sulfate Plus Base
3.    Ferric Sulfate
4.    Aluminum Sulfate (Alum)
5.    Lime (Single-Stage)
6.    Lime (Two-Stage)
7.    Waste Pickle Liquor Plus Base
8.    Sodium Aluminate
9.    Organic Polymers

Note: Polymers frequently added to assist flocculation

TABLE  2.   FACTORS  AFFECTING  CHOICE  OF
CHEMICALS

1.    Influent Phosphorus Level
2.    Effluent Discharge Standard
3.    Wastewater Characteristics
4.    Plant Size
5.    Chemical Costs Including Transportation
6.    Sludge Handling Facilities
7.    Sludge Disposal Facilities
8.    Other Processes Utilized

Performance of Clarification

   Chemical  clarification,  properly  conducted,  trans-
forms raw wastewater to a fully clarified effluent with
substantially  reduced  concentrations  of phosphorus,
organic matter  and  metals.  Typical results are shown in
Table  3 which provides  data obtained at  five plants.
Clarification  typically  removes  70-80  percent  of the
organic matter, 90-98 percent of suspended solids and
80-98 percent of the phosphate (8). Lesser removals may
be  obtained  when  chemical dosages are reduced  and
when  the  wastewater   contains  a higher-than-usual
proportion of dissolved organic matter.

        TABLE 3. TYPICAL PERFORMANCE
          OF CHEMICAL CLARIFICATION
    Plant
                 Chemical
Organic SS Rem. P. Rem.
Rem. %   %      %
 Ewing-Lawrence   170mg/lFeCl3    80      95    90
 New Rochelle (ZM) Lime pH 11.5      80      98    98
 Westgate, Va.      125 mg/1 FeCl3    70
 Salt Lake City     80-100 mg/1 FeCl3  75       -    80
 Blue Plains        Lime pH 11.5      80      90    95
Sludge Production

   The   addition  of  chemicals  to  raw  wastewater
obviously increases  the  weight  of sludge  produced,
compared to simple gravity sedimentation, because of
greater removals of suspended solids and because of the
presence of  precipitated  hydroxides,  carbonates  and
phosphates. The total weight of sludge produced can be
estimated in several ways: by weighing the sludge from a
jar  test or  pilot facility or by  calculating the amount
from  a knowledge of the precipitation  products  and
suspended and colloidal solids  removed. As  a rough
approximation, the weights of chemical sludge produced
per unit weight of coagulant fed are: 0.86 for ferric
chloride, 0.36 for alum and 1-1.5 for hydrated lime (9).
   Both the  volume  and weight  of sludge produced by
chemical  treatment  of  raw  wastewater  can  vary
substantially  from plant to plant because of  varying
wastewater characteristics, kind  and dosage of chemical
used  and  the  type  and method  of  operation  of
clarification  equipment. Data from several pilot plant
and full-scale  operations are summarized in Table 4.
   In  order  to put chemical sludges in the context of
familiar experience, the combined sludges produced by
conventional  primary and  secondary biological treat-
ment  are included in the summary. In terms of sludge
volume, chemical and biological sludges are comparable.
Low  pH lime precipitation will, in  fact, produce less
than half the volume than combined biological sludge. In
terms of weight of dry solids, lime processes produce 2-4
times  as much of sludge  as biological, while iron and
aluminum precipitation will produce as much or one-half
as much. Another characteristic  shown  in Table  4  is
sludge solids concentration. Lime sludges are characteris-
tically high  in solids  ranging from 4.4-11.1  percent.
Sludges produced by  iron or  aluminum salts range for
1.2-2.25 percent  which are  comparable  to the mixed
primary and waste activated sludge (10).
   Chemical sludges, like primary  and waste  activated
sludges, can  be handled in the usual ways; thickened,
digested  (except   for  high  pH  lime),  dewatered,
landfilled, land spread or incinerated.  All  of these
approaches are being considered in design of full-scale
plants or are  in operation. A more complete description

      TABLE 4.  SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS
    CHEMICAL TREATMENT  OF RAW SEWAGE

               Sludge Solids Wt. of Solids  Volume of Sludge
                  %     Ib/MG KG/m3  Ib/MG  1/m3
Primary & Waste
Activated Sludge
Lime, low pH
Lime, High pH
Aluminum
Iron

1.0
11.1
4.4
1.2
2.25

2,200 0.26
5,630 0.680
9,567 1.15
1,323 0.159
2,755 0.333

22,000
8,924
28,254
23,000
21,922

22.0
8.9
28.2
23.0
21.9
                         Average of data from Blue Plains, Lebanon, Taft Center, Salt
                         Lake City.

-------
of sludge production and disposal is contained in an EPA
Technology  Transfer   publication  entitled  "Process
Design Manual for  Sludge  Treatment  and  Disposal."
(11).

GRANULAR MEDIA FILTRATION

   The effluent from a chemical clarifier operating on
raw sewage will normally  contain  a small  amount of
suspended solids, on the order of 25 mg/1 or less. These
suspended solids can be  removed by filtering  the clarifier
effluent through a bed of granular media (12). In some
system designs, that  granular bed  is a carbon contactor,
acting as both an adsorber of dissolved organics and as a
filter of suspended solids. Carbon contactors, however,
are often quite deep, e.g. 12-16 ft (4-5 m), and cleansing
the bed  of accumulated solids can  be  difficult. Also,
there is no way to protect the carbon against upsets in
the clarifier which could lead to  rapid  plugging of the
bed. Finally, a packed  bed of carbon is an inefficient
filter  because  the  particle  size  gradation will  be
hydraulically classified from finer particles at the top of
the bed to coarser particles  at the bottom. Thus, many
designers prefer to assign the filtration role to a granular
media filter specifically  designed for that single purpose.
   A granular media filter could also be placed after an
adsorption  system  (13).  For example, upflow expanded
bed  granular  carbon systems do  not  remove  solids.
Moreover,  such systems may in  fact produce  a small
amount of additional solids in the  form of sloughing
biomass. Therefore, positioning the filter after fluidized
or expanded bed carbon contacting  would  provide for
removal of clarifier  effluent  solids (which pass through
the fluidized bed) and also any turbidity resulting from
the development of sloughing of biomass on  the carbon.
Granular media  filters  are  almost  essential as a  final
treatment step in powdered carbon systems in order to
prevent  substantial  quantities of the very small carbon
particles from being discharged in the effluent (5).

GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON

   The principal role of activated  carbon is the removal
of soluble  organic  material from wastewater. This is
accomplished  primarily  by  the physical adsorption of
organic molecules on the surfaces of the carbon, which is
a material  uniquely  suitable  for this purpose. The high
capacity  for  adsorption by carbon is derived from its
very large internal surface area (600-100 m^/g) and its
special  surface  properties   which  form   during  the
activation process.  When  the  capacity of  the carbon
surface to remove additional molecules is diminished to
a predetermined extent, the surface can be renewed by
treatment  of the   carbon  in  a  thermal regeneration
system,   where  the adsorbed organic  molecules  are
volatilized or oxidized and driven off the carbon. The
carbon,   thus reactivated,  is  reintroduced into  the
adsorption system and reused. A typical flow diagram
illustrating the series of operations is shown in Fig. 4.

Maximizing Carbon Utilization

   There  are  two  fundamental  objectives of  carbon
contactor design. The first is to maintain wastewater and
carbon  in  contact  for a  sufficient period of time  to
achieve  the desired degree of  organic  removal. Most
studies  on municipal wastewater  have indicated  opti-
mum contact times in the range of 20-40 min (based  on
empty bed volume). The second objective is to provide
that contact in such a way as to maximize the utilization
of the capacity  of the carbon to  remove organics and
thus minimize the replacement rate (14).
   From an adsorption standpoint, maximum utilization
of  the  carbon  capacity  is  obtained by the  use  of
countercurrent  operation.  An  examination  of  the
Freundlich equation,  an empirical relationship that has
been shown to adequately describe equilibrium data, will
show why:
                  __
                   M
                      =  kC
                           1/n
   where   X  = weight of organics adsorbed
           M  = weight of carbon applied
           C  = concentration of organics in
                solution at equilibrium
          k,n  = empirical  constants
   This  equation   shows   that  the  carbon   loading,
M
   (amount  adsorbed  per  unit  weight  of  carbon),
increases  as  the  equilibrium  concentration  of  the
organic  material in the solution increases. In counter-
current  contacting the carbon and the wastewater move
through  the contactor in  opposite  directions.  Thus,
carbon just  leaving the contactor is in equilibrium with

                      FIG,  1
               ACTIVATED CA33ON
              REGENERAT.OiV SYSTEM
              CARBON
            CONTACTOR
                               •PAkE
                           CARSON
                   REGti\ " V.IGN
        /DEWATERING   FURNrtC"
         SCREW
REGENERATED
  CARBON
                                         QUENCH
                                         TANK

-------
wastewater   with  the  highest  carbon  loading, —,
                                                 M
possible. Fresh carbon just entering the system contacts
the wastewater lowest in organics and provides the best
possible effluent  at that contact time.
   Since it is difficult in practice to achieve continuous
countercurrent  contacting,  adsorption  system  designs
approximate  countercurrent contacting by  using pulsed
bed, multiple-staged  series  operation,  or single-stage
parallel contacting.
   Pulsed-bed operation is  a close  approximation  to
continuous countercurrent contacting. Here wastewater
flows up through a packed  carbon bed.  Slugs of spent
carbon are periodically removed from the bottom of the
adsorber and replaced at the top with fresh carbon. The
system is analogous to incorporating a large number of
stages within a  single  contactor. This type  of carbon
contacting is commonly used as a "polishing" step to
handle highly pretreated wastewater essentially free of
suspended solids.
   The  two  most commonly  used designs for  treating
chemically clarified raw wastewater are shown in Fig. 5,
which illustrates single and two-stage contacting. As the
number  of stages increase,  the more closely counter-
current  contacting is  approached. However, more than
two stages generally become uneconomic because of the
complex piping and valving.
   Series contacting essentially divides an adsorber into a
number  of  contactors  in  series. When  the effluent
standard is reached or exceeded, the carbon in the lead
contactor is  removed and replaced with fresh (virgin or
regenerated)  carbon. That contactor is then  positioned
as the trail column and all other contactors  are advanced
one position in the train.
   Single-stage contacting divides the total  contactor
volume   requirement   into   a  number  of  parallel
contactors.  By  starting the  contactors in staggered
sequence, it  is possible to have on stream  at any given
time contactors  in various stages of  exhaustion.  Thus,
poorer  quality  effluents from  more  heavily  loaded
contactors can be blended with higher quality effluents
to  produce  the desired effluent  quality.  When  the
blended effluent quality reaches the allowable limit, the
carbon in the contactor which has been on stream the
longest is removed and replaced with fresh carbon (15).

Biological Activity

   A major factor in  the  operation of granular carbon
systems on chemically clarified raw wastewater is the
potential for  the development  of biological growths in
the carbon. These growths can cause  severe  plugging
problems in  very short  times. Therefore, packed-bed
contactors should be  designed so that they can be very
thoroughly backwashed. Auxiliary backwash aids such as
air-scour and surface wash should also be installed.
   The biological growths  in the carbon columns, which
cause plugging and headloss problems, also can extend
the life  of the carbon. Carbon granules tend to serve as
an  attachment  medium  for the  microbes while also
providing an enriched concentration  of substrate by
adsorption. The  mechanism of the  adsorption-biological
activity  interaction is not  clear, but carbon loadings far
in excess of those predicted by laboratory isotherm tests
have been observed in pilot tests conducted over a long
enough  time for the biological  activity to develop (16).
   An adverse effect resulting from biological activity is
the production  of the highly undesirable compound,
hydrogen sulfide. Several  methods have been  suggested
to cope  with this problem and all have exhibited varying
degrees  of success. The one procedure which has been
successful is addition of oxygen in the form of nitrate,
which can be added as sodium nitrate. At the Pomona,
California pilot  facility, 33 mg NaNC^/l (19 mg/1 as
oxygen) plus daily backwashing of the column to reduce
solids accumulation,  completely prevented  the forma-
tion of  sulfide (17). Concurrently, nitrate was reduced
to nitrogen gas.  An unexpected, but welcome, result of
nitrate addition  was the extension  of the life (capacity)
of the carbon. The carbon column was operated for  18
months  without replacement and  without a significant
decline  in  organic removal efficiency. The  apparent
loading  during  that time  reached a phenomenal 3.5 g
COD removed/g carbon of which  1.54 g/g was soluble
COD. Considering that values in the range of 0.5 g COD
removed/g  carbon are commonly  accepted for carbon
loading  in physical-chemical systems, it is apparent that
the mechanisms of filtration (2 g COD/g carbon due to
particulate  COD) and nitrate assisted biological activity
contributed greatly to the  organics removal.
                                                         Carbon Regeneration

                                                            When activated  carbon can no  longer  produce the
                                                         required effluent quality, it must be removed from the
                                                         adsorption system,  transported to a regeneration system
                                                         and   restored  to  nearly its original  condition.  In
                                                         municipal wastewater treatment,  regeneration of granu-

-------
lar carbon is accomplished thermally in a multiple-hearth
type of furnace (18). A typical furnace is shown in Fig.
6.  The  regeneration  system  consists of  dewatering
equipment,  a  feed  conveyor, the  furnace,  a steam
generator,  a product  quench  tank  and air pollution
control  equipment. Spent carbon enters the top hearth
and is dried. As the carbon progresses down the hearths
and  its temperature increases, adsorbed  organics  are
volatilized or pyrolyzed, leaving a char residue. Steam is
injected into the furnace to oxidize the char residue and
to restore the surfaces of the carbon to nearly its original
condition.
   During regeneration some loss  of carbon is experi-
enced through physical attrition and burning of carbon.
These losses can amount to 3-8 percent or  more of the
volume  of carbon  and are an important  part  of  the
economics  of carbon  technology,  since fresh carbon
must be added to maintain adsorption capacity.
   Additionally, changes in the physical characteristics
of  carbon  are incurred  during successive  loading and
regeneration cycles (19).  These  changes are illustrated in
Table 5. Mineral components of adsorbed organics and

   TABLE 5.  CHANGES IN CARBON PROPERTIES
        ON SUCCESSIVE REGENERATIONS
Cycle
Initial
1
2
3
Ash
Content, %
5.7
7 6
8.6
9.5
I2 No.
1090
1040
935
940
Molasses
No
250
310
290
350
Bulk Density,
g/cc
0.469
0.468
0.469
0.473
particulate inorganic material contribute to the increase
in ash of the regenerated  carbon.  Progressive changes
also  occur in the basic  pore structure of the carbon
particle. Surface contributed by small pores - >10 A-<
28 A as measured by Iodine Number - tends to decrease
while surface contributed by the larger pores - > 28 A
as measured  by  Molasses  Number,  tends  to  increase.
Little or no changes occur  in the bulk density. In spite
of  these  measured  changes,  the  net  effect on  the
capacity  of  carbon to  remove  organics  is  relatively
unaffected.
   Thermal  regeneration of carbon produces a gaseous
effluent containing carbon particles and noxious gases.
Both must  be  controlled  to  avoid pollution  of  the
atmosphere. Air pollution was successfully controlled at
the Pomona, California pilot plant system by the  system
shown in Fig. 7 (17). Flue gases from the furnace first
periodically  discharges  the  accumulated  dust  by
automatic reversal of the air flow. The particle free gases
pass through an afterburner operated at 1300-1400°F
(700-760°C)  which  incinerates  the  organic  material
which was volatilized from the carbon.  Other systems
have  used a water spray system to remove particulates
but also include the afterburner.

POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON

   Activated  carbon  is  also produced  in powdered
form (passing 300 mesh, 85 um). Recent research  studies
have  established that  powdered carbon  can  be used
successfully to  treat wastewater (20,21,22). Application
of this  technology has lagged behind that of granular
carbon primarily because regeneration of powdered  car-
bon has only  recently  been demonstrated.  With  this
development,  application  of powdered  carbon tech-
nology need not be deterred.

Contacting Systems

  Because of its small particle size, powdered  activated
carbon (PAC) must be  contacted with wastewater as a
slurry.  Rate of adsorption onto  PAC  is very fast,
equilibrium  being  reached in less than  10  minutes.
Generally, the same kind of equipment used in chemical
clarification can be used for carbon contacting. A com-
mon type of equipment is a solids-contact clarifier which
can be used to mix, flocculate and  settle the powdered
carbon. In addition, this kind of equipment allows  the
development of a carbon sludge with a residence time in
the contactor of several days, thus promoting the  de-
velopment of biological activity which, as was discussed
earlier,  contributes  greatly  to  carbon's  capacity  to
remove organics (5).
  After gravity clarification, the  wastewater should be
directed to a granular media filter for final polishing and,
more importantly, for  capture  of powdered  carbon
particles that escape the clarifier, and would otherwise
be lost from the system.

-------
                     To atmosphere

Fuel 	 *
>
Air „,. .
Afterburner

7~)-•
r..-i
Combustion air- » 	
1 1 Cyclone
\ / Baghouse
Hearth ^
Furnace I L J
r XX
/Regenerated Dus* to T
S~ carbon out storage drum*
jf «A*
— Make-up water *
Dust to storage drum
I ) Quench tank
To carbon \ / ... ...
column -s 	 ^^A — Motive Water
            Eductor
                         'DIAGRAM OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM
                                    FIG,  7
             PARTIALLY SPENT CARBON
INFLUENT
             SPENT
             CARBON
            1st STAGE
            CONTACTOR
            CLARIFIER
                                      CONTACTOR
                                      CLARIFIER
                                                       FRESH CARBON

_, -•


u. t
9 -0 • ff'
^Pr.»'
.0^3 c
                                                            „ - „ , o
                                                            .C7^^C
 GRANULAR
 MEDIA
 FILTER
— PRODUCT
                               FLOW DIAGRAF^l
                      TWO-STAGE  COUNTERCURRENT
                 POWDERED  ACTIVATED  CARBON SYSTEM
                                  FIG.  8
                                      10

-------
Carbon Utilization

  Adsorption  - and  concurrent  biological  activity -
normally takes place in a completely mixed vessel, which
can consist of a single stage of contact. To obtain higher
carbon loadings, two-stage countercurrent contacting is
desirable for high product quality. The rationale here is
the same as described for granular carbon. A typical two-
stage countercurrent contacting system is shown in Fig.
8. This system can treat raw wastewater directly or be
preceded by a  chemical clarification system much as is
used for the granular  carbon system. Fresh carbon is
added at the downstream clarifier, and is removed  from
the system as a sludge  from the  first contactor.  Carbon
solids separation may be obtained by metal coagulants
or preferably by organic polymers, since the latter con-
tributes no ash when the carbon is regenerated. In some
instances, flocculation occurs unaided and is adequate if
the clarifiers are operated at low overflow rates.

Regeneration

  Within the  past  2-3  years, it  has been shown  that
powdered  carbon  can be   successfully  regenerated
(22,23,24). The  carbon  sludge removed from the solids-
contact clarifier, is generally gravity thickened and then
dewatered.  A vacuum filter has successfully produced a
carbon cake of about 23-25 percent solids. Regeneration
has been demonstrated in  several  types of  thermal
devices, including  fluidized  bed  reactor containing  an
inert medium, transport reactor (commercial installation
regenerating 10 tons/day [9000  kg/day]),  in a multiple
hearth furnace and in a wet-air oxidation system.
and  12 sq ft/1000 gal/day (0.30 m2 /m3 /day) capacity
for extended aeration and low-rate trickling filters. Since
the efficiency of the processes depend upon the laws of
physics and chemistry and not upon the well-being of a
huge  population of living organisms  with various en-
vironmental requirements, the P-C  systems should  per-
form  in a more reliable manner. Operational flexibility
should  allow  more  precise process  control  than is
possible  with  the biological  systems. P-C  processes
remove many  materials  which  are  toxic to biological
systems, and are, in general, unaffected by those toxi-
cants not removed. Removals of phosphorus, refractory
organics and metals are greater  than those obtained by
biological systems.  And finally,  the effectiveness of P-C
treatment is not materially diminished by low waste-
water temperatures.
  From  the  foregoing,   however,   it  should not  be
assumed that  physical-chemical  treatment is universally
applicable.  The  concentration   and  adsorbability  of
soluble organics determine whether  activated carbon
treatment is applicable. The higher  the concentration of
organics, the more carbon will be required and the more
costly the process becomes. Certain  organic material,
especially water soluble, low molecular weight organics,
are poorly  or  not at all  adsorbed.  Thus, physical-
chemical treatment would be unsuitable for treatment of
wastes containing  a high  proportion of non-adsorbable
materials. The basic processes of clarification and carbon
do  not remove ammonia nitrogen, although  high re-
movals of  organic nitrogen  are  obtained.  Physical-
chemical  treatment thus must  be considered  as an
additional option when a wastewater treatment system is
being planned.
APPLICATION OF PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL SYSTEMS

  Extensive bench and pilot  scale research during the
past decade has resulted  in  physical-chemical systems
which  are  technically  and economically feasible alter-
natives to biological systems. At the present time some
fifteen full-scale plants  are in various stages of design and
construction, all of which will treat domestic/industrial
wastewater. Three plants are in  the initial  stages of
operation.  Additionally, at least 12-15 plants  are being
designed or  constructed  which  will apply  physical-
chemical systems to biological effluents to produce very
high quality effluents (15).
  The  reasons for choosing  physical-chemical systems
over the alternative  biological treatment are  generally
based on the several advantages that physical-chemical
systems possess. The area requirements are minimal. As a
rough comparison, the combined  area  requirement of
the  major  liquid  processing units in a  P-C system  is
roughly 2 sq ft/1000 gal/day (0.05 m2/m3/day) capacity
compared  to  values  of  6  sq  ft/1000  gal/day  (0.15
m2 /m3 /day) capacity for  conventional activated sludge
PERFORMANCE OF PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL
SYSTEMS

  At  present  time,  performance  data  from  full-scale
operating plants are  meager, although such information
should  be   available as plants come  onstream.  Per-
formance  data have, however, been accumulated over
the past several years on  fairly large  (~50,000 gal/day
[190 m3/day]) pilot plant systems (2, 13, 16, 17).
  Typical   effluent  quality from  a  physical-chemical
system  treating degritted raw  wastewater  is shown in
Table 6 below. The systems consisted of chemical clari-
fication and granular activated carbon operating with or
without a granular media filter.
  The range in product quality shown in the Table not
only reflects the usual expected variation, but also sug-
gests  the flexibility  that  is inherent  in  the treatment
system.  As an  illustration, organic product  quality —
COD, BOD— can be  allowed to vary over a considerable
range simply  by operating the carbon adsorption con-
tactors  for longer periods thus decreasing the regenera-
tion frequency and concurrently the cost.
                                                      11

-------
        TABLE 6.  EFFLUENT QUALITY FROM
            PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL SYSTEMS
   Parameter
                            Concentration Range - mg/1
Suspended Solids
BOD5
COD
Phosphorus - P
Color - Units
Turbidity - JTU
2-10
5-15
10-25
0.2- 1.0
5-10
<10
   Very high product quality is obtainable when physical-
chemical systems treat biological effluents. The product,
in many  instances,  is  suitable for a variety  of reuse
purposes including use  as supplement to potable water
source.  Product quality anticipated from  this type of
system is illustrated in Table 7.

 TABLE 7. EFFLUENT QUALITY FROM TERTIARY
          PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL SYSTEMS
   Parameter
                              Concentration - mg/1
                                    <
                                       1.

                                       1-2
Suspended Solids
BOD5
TOC
COD
Total Nitrogen — N
Total Phosphorus - P
Metals                       meet drinking water standards
CoUform Bacteria, MPN/100 ml          <  2.2
Fecal Coliform Bacteria, MPN/100 ml      <  2.2
Virus                                   0
                                       2.0
                                       0.1
                                                            TABLE 8. PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL PILOT PLANT
                                                                        POMONA, CALIFORNIA
                                                           Parameter
                                                                           Raw Sewage  Clarifier Effl.   Carbon Effl.
TCOD, mg/1
DCOD, mg/1
SS, mg/1
Turbidity, mg/1
BOD5. mg/1
Color, Units
P, mg/1
N03-M, mg/1
PH
321
49
199



11.1

7.7
96
49
28
23
36
20
1.3
0.9
6.8
19
14
7
6
8
8
0.9
1.3
6.8
Clarifier
   Flow - 60 gal/mm (3.8 I/sec) constant
   Overflow rate - 1180 gal/day/sq ft (48 cu m/day/sq/m)
   Weir loading -  10 gal/min/ft (2 1/sec/m)
   Detention time - 84 min.
   Alum dose - 25 mg Al/1
   Polymer dose - 0.3 mg/1 anionic
   Sludge Production - 2000 Jb/mil gal (250 mg/1)

Granular Carbon
   Flow - 50 gal/min (3.2 I/sec) constant
   Hydraulic loading - 4 gal/min/sq ft (10 cu m/hr/sq m)
   Contactor type - single-stage, packed-bed downflow
   Carbon size - 8 x 30 mesh (3 x 0.8 mm)
   Empty bed contact time - 30 min.
   Sodium nitrate dose — 33 NaNOj/l
   1st cycle  carbon loading  - 3.5  g TCOD removed /g carbon
   (1.5gDCOD/g)
   1st cycle carbon utilization rate - 173 Ib/mil gal (21 mg/1)
  Actual performance of a physical-chemical pilot plant
system operated at Pomona, California, for an extended
time—27 months—is shown in Table 8 (17). Also shown
are the engineering parameters of each of the two major
unit  processes—chemical clarification  and  carbon ad-
sorption systems.
                                                          Note:
                                                             Carbon column ran 18 months (1st cycle) prior to regenera-
                                                             tion and  was not exhausted. Three regeneration runs were
                                                             conducted in order to obtain regeneration data. Performance
                                                             data  shown above is average data over entire  27-month
                                                             operation.
 SUMMARY

    Research during the past decade has provided the
 design  engineer  with an array  of unit processes which
 provide, as never before, a capability to treat municipal
 wastewater to almost any  product quality. Increasingly,
 these unit processes are being  used  alone  or combined
 with biological  processes to satisfy the needs of any
 specific plant. The  number  of  possible combinations is
 large. All that is needed for  a successful operation is the
 ingenuity of the  design engineer.
                                                                            REFERENCES

                                                          1.  Cohen, J. M., Kugelman, I.J., "Physical-Chemical Treatment
                                                             for Wastewater," Water Research (GB), 6, 487 (1972).

                                                          2.  Bishop,  D.  F., O'Farrell, T. P.,  Cassell,  A. F., and Pinto,
                                                             A. P.,  "Physical-Chemical  Treatment  of Raw Municipal
                                                             Wastewater," EPA Technology Series, Washington, D.C.,
                                                             Report No. EPA 670-2-73-070.

                                                          3.  Stamberg, J. B., Bishop, D. F., Warner, H. P., and  Griggs,
                                                             S. H.,  "Lime  Precipitation in  Municipal  Wastewaters,"
                                                             Chem. Engng. Prog. Symp. Series. Water-1970, 67, No. 107.
                                                       12

-------
 4.  Mulbarger, M.  C, Grossman,  E., Dean R. B., and Grant,
    O. L., "Lime Clarification,  Recovery,  Reuse and Sludge
    Dewatering Characteristics," Jour. Water Poll. Control Fed.,
    41,2070(1969).

 5.  Burns, D.  E., and  Shell, G. L., "Physical-Chemical Treat-
    ment of a Municipal Wastewater Using  Powdered Carbon, "
    EPA, Environmental  Protection Technology  Series, EPA-
    R-2-73-264 (Aug. 1973).

 6.  "Process Design  Manual for Phosphorus Removal," EPA
    Technology Transfer, Washington, D C,  (Oct. 1971).

 7.  Cohen,  J. M.,  "Nutrient Removal  from  Wastewater  by
    Physical-Chemical Processes,"Chapter XII, NUTRIENTS IN
    NATURAL WATERS.  Edited  by H. E. Allen and  J. R.
    Kramer. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1972).

 8.  Westnck,  J. J., and Cohen, J.  M., "Comparative Effects of
    Chemical Pre-Treatment on Carbon Adsorption. " Presented
    at 47th Annual Conference, Water Pollution Control Federa-
    tion, Atlanta, Georgia, Oct. 1972 (In Press).

 9.  Isgard, E., "Chemical Methods in Present Swedish Sewage
    Purification Techniques. " Paper presented to 7th Effluent &
    Water Treatment Exhibition   and  Convention,  London,
    1971.

10.  Adrian, D. D.,  and Smith, J.  E., "Dewatering Physical-
    Chemical  Sludges." Applications  of  New Concepts  of
    Physical-Chemical Wastewater  Treatment, Pergamon Press,
    Inc., Sept.  1972

11  "Process Design  Manual for Sludge Treatment and Dis-
    posal. " EPA  Technology Transfer, Washington,  D.C., Oct
    1974.

12.  Culp, R. L., and Culp, G. L., ADVANCED WASTEWATER
    TREATMENT, Van Nostrand  Reinhold Co.,  New  York,
    1971.

13.  Weber, W. J., Hopkins, C. B., and  Bloom, R., "Physico-
    chemical  Treatment of Wastewater,"  Jour.  Water  Poll.
    Control Fed.,42, 83 (1970).
14. Westrick, J J.,  "Physical-Chemical Treatment," EPA Tech-
    nology Transfer Seminar (April 1975).

15. "Process  Design Manual  for Carbon  Adsorption,"  EPA,
    Technology Transfer, Washington, D.C.  (Oct. 1973).

16. Hopkins,  C. B.,  Weber, W. J., and  Bloom,  R.,  "Granular
    Carbon Treatment of Raw Sewage," EPA Water Pollution
    Control Research Series, ORD 17050 DAL (May 1970).

17  Directo, L. S., Chen, C. L., and Kugelman, I. J., "Pilot Plant
    Study of Physical-Chemical Treatment." Presented at the
    47th Annual  Water  Pollution Control Federation Confer-
    ence, Denver,  Colorado (Oct. 1974).

18. Cohen, J. M., and English, J. N., "Activated Carbon Re-
    generation. "  AIChE Symposium  Series,  Water-1974  -
    Industrial Wastewater Treatment No. 144, 70 (1974).

19. Juhola, A. J.,  "Optimization of the Regeneration Procedure
    for Granular Activated  Carbon,"  EPA Water  Pollution
    Control Research Series, 17020 DAO 07/70 (July 1970).

20. Garland,  C. F., and Beebe, R. L., "Advanced Wastewater
    Treatment Using Powdered Activated Carbon in Recirculat-
    ing Slurry  Contactor-Clarifiers," FWQA Water  Pollution
    Research  Series, ORD 17020 FKB 07/70 (1970).

21. Beebe,  R. L.,  "Activated Carbon Treatment of Raw Sewage
    in  Solids-Contact  Clarifiers," EPA  Environmental Pro-
    tection Technology Series EPA-R2-73-183 (March 1973).

22. Shuckrow,  A.  J.,  Dawson,  G.   W.,  and  Bonner,  W. F.,
    "Physical-Chemical Treatment of Combined and Municipal
    Sewage," EPA Environmental Protection Technology Series,
    EPA-R2-73-149  (Feb  1973).

23. Smith,  S. B.,  and Koches, C. F.,  "Plant Scale Thermal Re-
    generation of Powdered Activated Carbon  Used  in Sugar
    Purification. "  Presented  at  31st Annual  Meeting, Sugar
    Industry  Technologists, Inc., Houston,  Texas  (May 1972).

24. Burns, D. W.,  Wallace,  R. N., Cook, D.  J., and  Shell, G. L.,
    "FinalReport EPA Research Contract No.  68-01-0183,"in
    preparation.
                                                          13

-------
                STUDIES ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT WITH FLOCCULANTS APPLICATION.
                                 I. N. Maysnikov, L. V. Gandurina, L. N. Butzeva

                                               (VNH VODGEO)
    The  industry  growth  and the  rise of  populated
areas accomplishment is attended with the formation of
a great  number of wastes, which result in an environ-
ment pollution. In this connection great attention is paid
nowadays on  environment control improvement, in-
cluding  prevention of water sources pollution. Various
chemicals (oil  products, acids,  carbohydrates, alkalis,
cyanides,  sugars, pesticides, detergents  etc.) flowing
together with sewage break the natural processes taking
place  in water  reservoirs  sometimes  cause  failure  of
water supply of populated area and enterprised. Render-
ing such  substances  harmless at the  mechanical and
biomechanical  treatment stations presents considerable
pitfalls, and demands large capital and operating costs.
Besides, the removal effect of some contaminations, for
example oil products, heavy metals,  organic compounds,
biochemically   difficult   oxidizable   biogenous   sub-
stances, is not in accord with sanitary  standards and
causes the necessity of the subsequent post treatment.
   At the  same  time requirements to the quality  of
treated  sewages disposed into the reservoirs or directed
to the reused systems are ever increasing.
   It should be also noted that structures of mechanical
and biological treatment, used in most cases, have the
considerable  sizes, treatment process in which requires
prolonged time  and process control in these conditions
presents some difficulties.
   So, currently, along with the successes achieved in the
field  of mechanical  and  biochemical treatment  other
possibilities  of rising efficiency of rendering contamina-
tions  in  sewage  harmless are   being searched. The
combined use  of mechanical, physical  and chemical,
chemical and biological  sewage treatment is one of such
trends.
   Such  treatment  schemes   find  ever   expanding
application  in  practice of rendering industrial and
domestic sewage harmless. The experience of mentioned
stations use shows that the performance of physical and
chemical, and biochemical treatment structures gives the
possibility to increase the  efficiency of contaminations
removal, significantly reduce  the time of liquid treat-
ment and etc.
   In some  cases,  by application  of mechanical, and
physical and chemical treatment only, the standards for
the treated  effluents, intended for  the reused purposes
may be achieved. The ever increasing attention to the
process of physical and chemical treatment  derives also
from  the  fact, that they have a number of advantages,
for example, in comparison with biological  treatment,
physical and chemical treatment structures  require less
areas for  their location, there is  a possibility to remove
substances,  toxic  for  active  sludge  microorganisms,
difficult oxidizable and biogenous contaminations and
to make the treatment process fully automatic and etc.
   New highly efficient flocculants  formation aids  in
successful use  of chemical  process  in physical and
chemical treatment while neutralizating industrial and
domestic wastewaters.
   As a rule their use in small doses in water treatment
process makes it possible to get less quantity of sediment
and  to intensify all  the technological  processes of the
industrial effluents.
   However,  at present, the majority  of the present
physical  and  chemical treatment  structures still  use
mineral coagulants—aluminium salts, ferrum salts and
lime, which have  some significant disadvantages: large
chemical doze, small strength of flock formation, low
rate   of  hydrolysis  large  sludge volume,  difficulties
related to dewatering and utilizing of large quantities of
sludges.
   The studies show that providing water supply  in-
dustry with highly efficient flocculants makes it possible
to increase more the efficiency of physical and chemical
treatment structures.
   This paper presents the results of studies on waste-
water  treatment  by  applying  flocculants  and their
combinations  with  mineral  coagulants. Experiments
were  carried  out on effluents of such industry fields as
chemical, petroleum chemical and paper and pulp.
   Separation  of  solid phase  (flock)  and  liquid was
performed by  settling in cylinders  for an  hour  or
two  and  filtering  through  paper  filter, model filter
with the sand medium, compression flotation in labora-
tory  installation  with  flotation  camera of 100 mm
diameter and 1500 mm height.
   As the  majority of industrial effluent contaminations
has the negative charge, the  studying  of water soluble
cationic flocculants,  macroion of which is positively
charged,  is of  particular interest. Such  flocculants are
able  to cause  natural coagulation of negatively charged
particles.
   There are also given the results, obtained by a number
of scientists.
   The greatest emphasis in  our  work is placed on  oil
contained sewage  treatment  studying, because of  its
complex  composition  and  substantial  quantity  of
organic substances with the difficulty  oxydized  ones
among them.
       So, in order to study  the  high treatment rate of
oil contained  sewage, the use of highly molecular syn-
thetic flocculants, both independently and together with
                                                      14

-------
TABLE I
Flocculants'
marks



1
HPS-46
HPS-47
HPS-48
HPS-49
HPS-411
HPS-11




HPS-7
Vinylpyndines Alkylat-
ing
agent


2 3
4-vinylpyridine CH3
~"~ C2H5
C3H7
C4H9
-"- C2H5Br
2-methyl-5 vinyl
piridine C2H5fir
_"_ _"_
_"— _"_
_"_ _"_
C2H5
Viscosity
character
/ /
delitre/
IB
4
0.75
0.76
0.70
0.20
0.78

0.4
2.26
4.0
9.4
0.4
M
10-S6



5
__
—
—
-
-

0.112
0.726
1.26
3.24
-
Exchange
volume
mg-equiv/
/g

6
3.94
3.23
3.47
3.48
4.05

4.44
4.2
4.16
3.80
3.5
mineral coagulants-aluminium  sulphate, hydrolysis  of
which occurrs with a rather high rate at pH 6.5 - 75, was
investigated.
   Highly basic water  soluble polyelectrolites  of HPS
serie (highly molecular pyridine salts on vinylpyridine
base). Characteristics of the mentioned polyelectrolites
are presented in Table 1.
   In this case from sewage with COD = 558 mg02/l, 64
mg/1 of suspended solids and 40.8 mg/1 of oil products,

       Note.  Molecular mass of polyelectrolites HPS-II was
 calculated from the following formula

               [n] =7.16°10-6M°94

       In combined raw sewage treatment with the aluminium
 sulphate and flocculants HPS-46, 47, 48, 49 with the subse-
 quent settling during two hours, it was found that HPS-47 ap-
 plication was the most efficient (Table 2).
Table 2
Flocculant
description
       Influence of flocculant type on treat-
       ment efficiency of petroleum contained
       wastewaters with coagulation and set-
       tling. (2 hours)
Dose mg/1
treatment efficiency, %
           Al2(SO4>3   offloccu-  COD  suspended  oil
                       lant             solids     product
                                                 73
                                                 70.5

                                                 69
                                                 77.5
HPS-46
HPS47

HPS-48

HPS-49


48
48
96
48
96
48
48
96
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0
0
23.1
80
33.2
70
33.2
19.7
13.1
26.6
90.8
93.2
96.5
95.4
91.5
86.0
90.5
95.5
 contaminations  are  removed  by 80%, 93.2%  and 73%
 respectively.
    It should be emphasized that in the same conditions
 but without flocculant, the COD value decreases only by
 13.1%. It is supposed, that high treatment efficiency is
 achieved by  interaction  of flocculant with contamina-
 tions found in the water not only in emulsifiable but in
 dissolved condition.
    From the  mentioned materials it is apparent that the
 rate of treatment from suspended solids and oil products
 by  applying HPS-47  is also increased.  Doubling  the
 coagulants dose  in  this condition,  in fact,  does  not
 change  the treatment efficiency  from the suspended
, solids,  yet causes the COD increase from 20 to 70% in
 treated residual water.
    So application of aluminium sulphate and flocculant
 with 50  mg/1  and 2 mg/1 respectively concentrations
 looks more promising in comparison with the usually
 used at oil refineries doses of one coagulant, equaled to
 100-150 mg/1.
    The  possibility  of water  treatment by the use of
 flocculants  only  was  also  studied.  The  preliminary
 experiments  demonstrated  low efficiency  of 4  vinyl-
 pyridine  based  flocculants in settling process of two
 hours   duration.  Consequently,   flocculated  flocks
 removal by filtering was studied.
    The results obtained in wastewater treatment process,
 at COD-52 mg/1 and 58 mg/1 of petroleum  products
 concentration,   and treated  with  10 mhmg/1  poly-
 electrolyte, are given in Table 3.
    It is apparent from the  obtained data analyses  that 2
 methyl-5  vinylpyridine and 4 vinylpyridine based poly-
 electrolytes alky late d with  (ethyl  bromide and  ethyl
 iodide  (HPS47, HPS-411,  HPS-11)  were found  to be
 more  efficient  from   all  polymers  flocculants  in
 flocculation  and  filtration process. These flocculants
                                                        15

-------
application makes it possible to reduce  COD value by
87.5% and oil concentration by 93.4%. Molecular weight
increase of flocculant HPS-11 from 112000 to 726000
results in  COD removal by 50%. This is due to the fact
that macromolecule size increase causes bonding of the
large number of colloid particles to the one polymeride
macromolecule forming therewith large flocks.

   TABLE 3.  TREATMENT EFFICIENCY WHEN
    FLOCCULATION WITH FILTRATION USED.
mg 02/1 COD 40.7-172 mg/1 ether extracted ones, after
treatment  by pressure  flotation and cationic  polyelec-
trolites preliminary introduced into sewage.
 Flocculant
                        Treatment efficiency, %%
type
HPS-46
HPS47
HPS48
HPS-19
HPS-411
HPS-7
HPS-11 1^8=112000
HPS-11 M-V s=2726000
Petroleum Products
91.0
88.4
93.4
91
91
88.4
95.4
92.5
COD
14.1
87.5
37.9
-
87.5
65.6
38.2
87.5
   In an  effort to determine the influence of the floc-
culant  molecular weight  on treatment process, experi-
ments were performed on coagulated wastewater treat-
ment by means of settling and compression flotation.
   Fig. 1  presents gained results.  The displayed  data
demonstrate  that  removal  efficiency  rises  with  the
increase of polyelectrolytes molecular weight. At  the
same time  flotation  during  10  minute provides better
suspended solids removal in comparison with settling for
an hour. So flotation treatment of oil contained sewages
pretreated with polyelectrolyte  HPS-11 (M=3.24.10'6)
and containing 57 and 75 mg/1 of suspended solids gave
their removal  to the  residual concentration 4.0 and 9.0
respectively that constitutes 80.5% and 93%.
   Wastewater COD in the  treatment process decreases
by 70.6  and 75.6%, oil products- by 75%. (Co = 36
mg/1).
   From  other types of polyelectrolites VA-2  (poly-
styrene based  quarternary ammonium salt), P El (poly-
ethyleneimine), cationic polyacrilamide. The comparison
analysis of treatment rate of preflocculated wastewaters
by  settling and filtration method, shows, that P El
(molecular  weight  =  80000)  is  the most  efficient.
Optimum dose of P El determined  by  experimental
coagulating method averaged 5 mg/1.
   Results obtained  during oil contained  sewage treat-
ment with flocculants, are given in Table 4.
   In an  effort to intensify the suspension removal from
water, treated with flocculant PEI (5 mg/1 dose), sewage
treatment by  compressure  flotation method  was  con-
ducted.  The   performed  experiments   demonstrated
considerable  decrease  of contaminations amounts in
sewage with 21 - 36.7 mg/1 suspended solids, 484-600
TABLE 4
     Indices
                                   Sewage composition
After oil separator

1
PH
COD mg/1
BOD mg Oj/l
Suspended solids
mg/1
K - P mg/1
Volatile phenols
with vapour, mg/1
Non ionogenous
detergents, mg/1
Chlorides
PEI mg/1

2
7.1 -
580 -
98.0 -

87.6 -
9.55 -

0.65 -

6.5 -
2950



7.7
1300
-130

- 133
- 155.8

-9.6

16.0
-5700
-
After physical and
chemical treatment
C -5 mg/1
3 PEI
7.1 - 7.8
270 - 660
15.0-24.5

2.1 -4.6
0.75 -5.4

0.6 - 8.9

5.5 - 14.5
—
0.003 - 0.07
                                                     16

-------
   Thus,  suspended solids  concentration  reduces by     possible to evaluate the  influence of flocculant nature
72-95%, etherextracted substances by - 89 - 91% and     and its dose on treatment efficiency.
COD value - by 36 - 56%.                                   Fig. 2, 3 give the curves of suspended solids decrease
   It is  a matter of  general experience,  that reagent
introducing place, plays a leading role  in sewage treat-
ment by  flotation. In  most cases, for removal of the
major  portion  of contaminations, petroleum products
for  example, the  chemical supply  into  saturator is
efficient and in post treatment process of biologically
treated sewages; when  easily broken flocks are removed,
coagulant is supplied to a flotation chamber.
   It turned out in this case that polyethylene  intro-
ducing  place in flotation process has no  practical in-
fluence on treatment efficiency.
   The duration of water presence in flotator is one of
the factors responsible for process economy.
   The  study of influence  of pressure flotation effi-
ciency on time, revealed that the bulk of contaminations
amount is  removed in  5 minutes and in 10  minutes the
process is over. The following water presence in flotation
chamber leads to the foamy layer damage which causes
the water pollution again.
   In ballast and industrial sewage treatment  of petro-
leum transshipping reserves, the efficiency  use of some
flocculants of cationic, anionic, and non ionic character
was studied.
   Among  cationic  polyelectrolites  polyethyleneimin,
poly-1.2 dymethyl-5  vinylpiry dine-methyl sulphate
(PPS), poly—1 ethyl-2 methyl-5 vinylpyridine-bromide
(HPS-11),   polyelectrolites   of  VA  serie:   VA-212,
VA-112, VA-102  were tested. Among nonionogenous
and  anionic flocculants metas  (copolymeride of  meta-
crylamide and metacrylitic acid), polyacrylamide and its
derivatives: PAA-H and RAA-R were used.
   The  comparative  evaluation of mentioned polyelec-
trolites efficiency was made  on the basis of the ex-
perimental sewage clarification for two hours in one litre
cylinders at various dose presence of studied substances.
   When studying the simultaneous effect of aluminium
sulphate with  anionic and nonionic  flocculants on
treatment rate  of ballast  and industrial sewage it was
revealed that the highest treatment efficiency is achieved
by the use of polyacrylamide (C =1.0 mg/1) for ballast
waters and metas (c = 2 mg/1) for industrial waters.
Aluminium sulphate concentration constitutes 8  mg/1
(by aluminium ione). Thus at optimum  chemicals doses
after an hour settling of ballast and industrial sewage of
oil transshipping reserves, suspended solids concentra-
tion  reduces by 68 and 98%, and sewage COD-by 75%
and 30% respectively.
   In order to achieve  the same treatment rate after an
hour settling at  sewage  treatment with  aluminium
sulphate,  chemicals  dose constitutes 25-32  mg/1  (by
ione Al3+).
   Ballast and industrial sewage treatment with cationic
flocculant  and  subsequent  sewage  settling,  makes it
                                                      17

-------
and  ballast  industrial sewage  at settling.  From  the
obtained data it  is clear  that the most efficient were
flocculants VA-112, PPS and H  C = 11 (mol. weight =
726000, the use of which at 5 mg/1 amount allows to
reduce suspended solids concentration by 75-83.5% and
COD-by 40-50%.
   At flocculation and settling of industrial sewage of oil
transshipping reserves, best results were obtained by the
use of PPS strong basic polyelectrolite  of 3 mg/1 con-
centration,  for  example   PPS  flocculant  application
allows to  reduce suspended solids concentration  to 22
mg/1  (with initial =108 mg/1), COD - with initial = 170
mg/1.
   In order to intensify the process of flocculated flocks
separation   and  sewage  clarification,  treatment  by
compressure flotation method was also used, as a result
of conducted  studies  it was found that high treatment
effluency  may be  achieved  either by application of
anionic and  nonionic type flocculant, or by independent
use of cationic flocculants. Thus, flotation treatment of
ballast sewages, treated with aluminium sulphate (C = 8
mg/1  by  A ione) and  metas  (C = 2  mg/1) gives  the
possibility to reduce oil concentration to 1.7 mg/1 (with
the initial = 45 mg/1). The use of one coagulant (C = 8
mg/1) allows to reduce oil products concentration only
to 5 mg/1.
   Among cationic type flocculants at flotation treat-
ment PPS—is the most efficient.  So, at treatment with
the mentioned flocculant  of 3 mg/1  concentration, the
suspended solids amount in sewage decreases from 30.5
to 11.0 mg/1, and petroleum products — from 7.6 to 2
mg/1.
   Investigation of municipal sewage treatment  by  the
use  of PEI,  carried  out  at  the Scientific Research
Institute of municipal water supply and sewage treat-
ment of the Academy of municipal management named
after Pamphilov, demostrated that PEI allows to remove
from sewage  substances,  being  in the water both in
colloid and dissolved condition (dye-stuffs, naphthenic
acids and humic  substances, ions of transitive metals).
The results of one  serie  of experiments, when pre-
coagulated water was  subjected to settling and filtering,
are given in Table  5. Optimum PEI dose, determined by
the experimental coagulation method, ranges from 2 to
80 mg/1  and averages  10 mg/1. The  increase  of dose
higher than optimum one leads to the decrease of sewage
treatment efficiency.
   As  it  was  stated  earlier, the  available  treatment
methods  (mechanical  and biochemical) do  not allow
complete  removal  of difficulty  oxidizable substances
from sewage; acid type dye-stuffs in particular.
   Regarding this,  high molecular flocculant application
for this purpose is of great practical interest.
   Studies carried  out by the  Moscow chemical  and
technological   Institute  named   after  Mendeleyev  in
cooperation   with  the  Central  Scientific  Research
Institute of wool,  demonstrated that  the use of poly-
electielites  of  serie HPS, results in a high degree of
sewage treatment from dye-stuffs.
   Best results were got by using HPS-11 with 1.260000
molecular  weight, as  a  precipitator.  Polyelectrolite
molecular  weight  decrease  is  accompanied  by  the
increase of polymer recipitator  dose. Besides, it should
be  emphasized  that  dependence  degree of dye-stuffs
removal from water solutions reaches its maximum at
increase of the polymeric precipitation dose.
   lonogenous  group presence both in  dye-stuffs  and
polyelectrolites  molecules, gives the reason to expect
that dye-stuffs settling takes place as a result  of chemical
interaction  of  these  functional groups, condition of
which  (dissociation  rate) has  the main influence  on
flocculant settling ability.
   The  increase  of  polyelectrolite molecular weight
results  in  viscosity   increase  and  consequently-in
increase of  size and  efficient charge of polyelectrolite
macromolecule.   Settling  ability   of  flocculant  BBC
changes is also in the same way.
     Optimum  flocculant dose depends on dye-stuffs
concentration and ranges from  2 to  20  mg/1  and
averages 10  mg/1. The  rate of sewage  treatment ranges
from 75 to 100% depending on dye-stuffs' nature.
   Correlating of the experimental results for dye-stuffs
of  different  types (polyelectrolite dose, settling  rate)
points  to the fact that dye-stuff molecules react to some
elementary flocculant links.

Sewage post treatment with chemical application.

   Chemical  treatment  of sewage, biologically treated
with mineral coagulants with the subsequent separation

Table 5
Contamina-
tion type
or factor,
characte-
rising
water qua-
lity
1
BOD
COD
Suspended
solids
Protein
substances
Oil products
Detergents
Alizarine
Indigo
carmine
P205
0,2
Cr2
Ammonia
nytrogen
Water,
flow-
ing to
treat-
ment

2
87-139
200-435

120-168

79-417
10-40
3.1-5.8
0.84

0.63
20-31.5
2.3-4.0
7.7-10.3

8-32
Municipal sewage
Coagulated % of treatment


settled


3
40-61
99-191

26-61

74-98

0.8-3.6
0.64

0.35
12-25.5
0.5-1.6
1.7-3.4

8-28
mg/1

filtered


4
16-24
58-108

0.8-37

6.9-48
0-0.17
09-1.6
0.1

0.15
11-15
0.2-0.5
0.6-1.9

7.5-28

at
settling


5
51.0
53.0

76.7

69.3
_
-
2.38

44.4
38.0
68.0
48.6

5.0

at
settling
and
filtering
6
81.0
73.2

97.8

86.5
99.8
71.3
88.0

76.2
61.6
91.1
79-0

8.3
                                                      18

-------
of  coagulated  contaminations  by  pressure  flotation
method is  one of the efficient methods of post treat-
ment.  Investigations  were  conducted  on biologically
treated sewages of oil refinery (OR), integrated pulp and
paper (IPPM) and chemical mills (ICM).
   Treated water characteristics are given in Table 6.
Table 6
Item
PH
Suspended solids mg/1
Ethersoluble mg/1
Sulphides mg/1
Chlorides mg/1
Phosphate, mg/1
Ammonia nitrogen mg/1
Nitrite nitrogen mg/1
Nitrate nitrogen mg/1
Phenol mg/1
Saltcontent, mg/1
COD mg/1 02
BOD full, mg/1 07
BOD5 mg/1 02
Dissolved oxygen, mg/1 02

OR
7.1
8.0-20.0
14-20
34
610
2
3.5
2.5
12.0
0.35
840
90-200
75
7.0
2.9

ICM
7.0
25.0
-
-
-
-
5.2
0.22
46.7
-
-
40
—
3.0
-

IP.PM
7.0
20-100
-
-
-
1.8



-
-
600
—
20-50
3.0
   As a result of investigations carried  out on coagula-
tion of sewages  intergrated  chemical and oil refinery
mills with aluminium sulphate, and subsequent treat-
ment by pressure flotation method, it was revealed, that
coagulant application at  doses from 2 to 10 mg/1  is
accompanied by  the increase of sewage treatment rate.
Thus,  at  aluminium  sulphate  dose of 10 mg/1, con-
centration of suspended solids reduces to 1.7 mg/1 (with
the initial = 9.0  mg/1;  ethersolubles one-to 6.7 mg/1
(with the initial =  16.7 mg/1) COD value-to 84 mg/1
(with the  initial =188 mg/1).
   Studies on posttreatment sewages of  the  pulp and
paper  industry  by pressure flotation method, were
conducted both with coagulant application and without
it. Aluminium sulphate with concentration ranging from
2 to 20 mg/1 (by  ion A) was used as a coagulant.
   The  optimum  sulphate  aluminium concentration,
consisting 10  mg/1, provides suspended solids removal
by 80-90%, phosphorus ones—by more than 50%.
   BODs  and  COD values therewith reduces by 40% and
70%  respectively.  At the same time water  saturation
with oxygen, the contents of which encreases 2-3 - fold
after a ten minutes flotation, takes place.
   It may be  said in  conclusion,  that in all  cases floc-
culant application for treatment of sewages of different
composition is accompanied by the increase of treat-
ment rate.  At present,  polyelectrolites application  in
sewage  technology is  often in  particular  need and
non-replaceable  and  sometimes  it  is  more efficient
despite the high cost.
                                                       19

-------
          THE OPERATION OF THE PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL PLANT AT ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA

                                              Dr. Robert Polta
INTRODUCTION

   The Metropolitan Sewer Board  of the  Twin Cities
Area was formed in 1969. In 1970 the MSB acquired the
33  wastewater  treatment  facilities  and  320  miles of
interceptor in the 7 county metropolitan area. Of the 33
plants  acquired  only  4 produced treated  effluents in
compliance with applicable water  quality standards.
Twelve plants have been  closed  to date  and several
others  have been upgraded. Three  new treatment facili-
ties have  been put into service since 1972-one being the
Rosemount   advanced  wastewater  treatment  plant
(AWTP).
   The original  Rosemount treatment facility consisted
of a high rate trickling filter plant which discharged to
an  effluent seepage pond from  which  the effluent
escaped by percolation and evaporation. No other outlet
was available for the effluent at that site and the seepage
pond was operating at capacity. Thus it was not possible
to expand  the  plant to meet the increasing hydraulic
loading.
   The new plant was to discharge to Spring Lake which
is  part of the Mississippi River.  At that time however
studies were being made to determine the feasibility of
separating the lake from the Mississippi  River and desig-
nating  it for recreational use.  The evaluation of the
water quality standards and their applicability to receiv-
ing waters of  limited  dilution  capacity  led to  the
adoption of the  following effluent quality  limits for
design criteria:
   BOD
   Suspended Solids
   Total Phosphorus
-10mg/l
-10mg/l
-  1 mg/1
                                                     20

-------
   Ammonia Nitrogen
   Total Coliform Organisms
-  1 mg/1
- lOOOMPN/lOOml
                TABLE 1
ROSEMOUNT AWTP - ON-LINE PROCESSES
   Several design alternatives were evaluated for a design
flow of 0.6 MGD. Estimated owning and operating costs
indicated  that  a  physical-chemical treatment facility
would be most  cost efficient. It was also recognized that
the use  of these new treatment processes would serve to
fully evaluate the feasibility, economics and  application
of individual unit processes for future treatment plant
construction elsewhere.
   The  decision was made in 1971 to build the  Rose-
mount AWTP. The gate opened November 20, 1973 and
the facility has been in operation since that time.

PLANT DESCRIPTION

General

   The  plant  is  composed  of process  units totally
enclosed in a 15,000 sq. ft. steel building. After metering
and coarse screening the flow is pumped to  one or two
parallel  process trains  each with a design capacity  of
300,000 gal/day, Figure 1. The essential treatment units
in each process train  are  presented in Table 1 in  the
order in which they appear in  the plant.
                                  Unit
                           Suspended solids
                           contact clarifier (1)
                           Dual media filters (2)

                           Granular activated carbon
                           colums (3)

                           Dual media filters (2)

                           Ion exchange columns
                           (clinoptilolite)
                                 Function
                     BOD, suspended solids and
                     phosphorus removal
                     suspended solids removal

                     soluble organic removal


                     suspended solids removal

                     ammonia nitrogen removal
                              Considerable operational flexibility exists within each
                           train. The  first stage filters (DMFj) can be bypassed.
                           The carbon columns may be operated in  several modes.
                           The second stage filters (DMF2) may also be bypassed.
                              The flow  from  the  two  trains is  mixed  prior  to
                           chlorination and  discharged  to  the Mississippi  River
                           (Spring Lake) through a forcemain approximately one
                           and one half miles long.
                              The support or off-line processes at the plant include
                           chemical  feed systems, activated carbon transfer and
                           regeneration systems and a zeolite regeneration system.
                                                      21

-------
ON LINE PROCESSES

Clarification

   A suspended solids contact clarifier is the first unit in
each process train. The units are 25 feet in diameter and
have a side water depth of approximately 13 feet-see
Figure 2. At design flow (208 gal per min. per unit) the
surface settling rate is 0.5 gal per min per square foot
and the detention time is approximately 3 hours and 45
minutes.
   Each unit is equipped with a skimmer and grease box
as well as a  rotating sludge  plow.  A variable speed
turbine type mixer is used  to provide turbulence for
mixing the chemicals with the sewage flow. This turbine
also affects sludge recycle through the draft tube. Sludge
is removed  from the  clarifier  on a  flow proportional
basis, by gravity, and discharged to a holding tank. The
sludge is  currently  disposed of by  hauling to another
MWCC facility or by subsurface injection on site.
   The clarifier overflow is collected and discharged to a
weir  box where  sulfuric  acid can  be added  for pH
control as required. The overflow rate is  determined at
this point  to  allow  for flow  proportional chemical
additions in the clarifier.
                                             ©  Rav.
                  (now Distributor]
                  Anthracite Coal
   ©


 V Haste
IE

©
                                          ©
                                        j^20
                 DUAL KEDIft FILTER

                  Rosemouni AUTP
                   Figure 3.
Filtration
   The two primary and two secondary filters per train
are essentially  identical. The backwash water storage
tank is located directly above the filter box as illustrated
in Figure 3. Each filter box is 8 feet  in diameter pro-
viding for loading rates of 2 gal per min per square foot
at design flow. The loading rate doubles when one filter
of a pair is taken out of service for backwash. The filter
media consists of approximately 24 inches of anthracite
coal with an effective size of l.lmm and 12 inches of
sand with an effective size of 0.45 mm.
   During normal operation the raw water enters valve
   (A) and passes through the flow distributor and down
through  the  filtration media and  underdrains, through
valve (B), up through the  backwash storage compart-
ment and over  the  discharge weir.  When backwash is
initiated valves  (A) and (B) close and valve (C) opens to
drain down the filter box  to  that  level. After  this is
accomplished valve (C) closes and valve (E) opens and
valve (D) opens to allow  air to pass up and scour the
media.  Valve (D) then closes  and valve (B) opens to
provide an  upflow expanded bed wash. After backwash,
valve (E) closes and valve  (A) opens. The filter is then
ready for service.
   The  available  head allows for  backwash  rates of
approximately  15 gal per min per square foot. The air
scour rate is  approximately 5 cubic feet per square  foot
per  minute.  Backwash is  presently initiated manually
although a  program timer  is available for automatic
initiation.

Carbon Adsorption

    Each of the three carbon columns  per train is 8 feet
 in diameter and approximately 27 feet high-See Figure
 4. A  nominal  depth of  12 feet  of granular activated
 carbon  (Westvaco 12 x 40 mesh) is maintained in each
 column. The piping and valve arrangement (32 air acti-
 vated valves per carbon column train) allows consider-
 able flexibility in terms of operating modes. Any 2 of
 the 3 columns  may be operated in the following modes:
 series  upflow, series downflow, primary  upflow  and
 secondary  downflow  and  parallel  downflow.  Series
 upflow and series  downflow have been  the  primary
 operating modes to date.
    The carbon columns  are backwashed  on a  routine
 basis to remove debris and to limit the accumulation of
 biomass in the carbon bed. The procedure includes a 30
 minute air scour and a 15 minute backwash at a rate of
  12 gal per square foot per minute.
    When the desired organic removals can not longer be
 maintained  across   the  carbon  column,  one  of the
  columns is  taken out of  service and replaced with a
  column containing regenerated carbon. The spent carbon
  is transported to the regeneration facility by an air aided
  hydraulic transfer.  Water is pumped  through the  back-
  wash entrance  and air supplied to the top of the column
                                                        22

-------
at 12  psi as the valve on  the  carbon transfer  line is
opened. The carbon  slurry is thus forced through  the
transfer line and discharged to the spent carbon holding
tank. The 600 cubic feet of carbon can be transferred in
approximately 20 minutes.

Ion Exchange

   The ion exchange columns are pressure vessels 8 feet
in diameter  and, approximately 14  feet  high.  Each
column contains  a 6 foot depth of the natural  zeolite
clinoptilolite (20 x 50 mesh) supported on gravel pack-
ing and plastic strainers. The  plant  flow passes down
through two zeolite beds in series. When the NH3-N level
in the effluent of the second  column reaches  a pre-
determined  level  the primary column is taken  out of
service for regeneration. The secondary column is  moved
up to the primary position and a regenerated  column is
placed in the secondary position.
          downflow enter
  carbon transfer air enter
underdrains
                carbon depth   12 feet
                                       /
                                     o
                                         upflow header
                                         downflow exit
                                          backwash enter
                                         carbon transfer
     Rosemount AUTP
CARBON COLUHfIS

  Figure 4
OFF LINE PROCESSES

Chemical Feed Systems

Lime
Lime slurry  is  used to  maintain an  elevated  pH  in
the clarifier when required. The lime delivery system as
illustrated in Figure 5 consists of a lime storage silo with
capacity for approximately 30  tons hydrated lime,  a
slurry  mixing  tank with  a  capacity  of about 1650
gallons, slurry  transfer pump, a slurry storage tank of
about  8000 gallons capacity and four, variable  stroke,
diaphram chemical feed  pumps. The lime slurry con-
centration  is  maintained at approximately  2.5%. The
slurry feed pumps have a maximum capacity of 5 gallons
per minute each  and  are used to maintain  flow pro-
portional lime feed.

Ferric Chloride
   Liquid ferric chloride  (approximately 40% FeCl3) is
delivered to the plant and stored in a 6500 gallon fiber-
glass tank. The  ferric chloride is used as a coagulant in
the clarifier. Four, variable stroke,  diaphram chemical
feed pumps deliver the ferric chloride to the clarifiers on
a flow proportional basis. The pumps have a capacity of
15 gallons per hour each.

Polymer
   An  anionic polymer is used as a coagulant  aid in  the
clarifier. The  polymer is delivered  in liquid  form and
diluted to a  concentration of  0.25% in one of two
mixing tanks. Four, variable stroke, diaphram chemical
feed pumps feed  the solution to the clarifier  on a flow
portional  basis.  The pumps have a capacity of 7.5 gal-
lons per hour each.

Chlorine
   Chlorine is supplied to the plant in one  ton cylinders.
Two standard vacuum operated chlorinators with manual
rate control are  used to deliver chlorine solution to the
effluent and  at  several points in the plant. The plant
effluent  is served by  a  unit with a  capacity  of 100
pounds per day. The in-plant chlorine is supplied by a
unit with a capacity of 400 pounds per day.

Activated Carbon Regeneration

   The  carbon  regeneration  system  is  illustrated  in
Figure  6. Spent  carbon is transported to the dewatering
tank  where  gravity  drainage  reduces the  moisture
content to appromately  50%.  A variable  speed screw
conveyer then delivers the carbon to a multiple hearth
furnace. The four hearth furnace is 54 inches in diameter
and is equipped  with a wet  scrubber and afterburner to
control stack emissions. During  regeneration the hearth
temperatures are maintained in the following ranges:
                                                       23

-------
     Hearth
        1
        2
        3
        4
Temp. Range —c
   900 to 1050
  1400 to 1500
  1550 to 1650
  1600 to 1700
Steam is injected  into hearth number 4 to aid in the
regeneration process.
   The  carbon is  quenched as it discharges from the
furnace and  is  transported to a storage tank similar
to the on-line  carbon  columns. Carbon is transferred
from the storage tank to  one of the on-line columns by
the transfer technique previously described.

Zeolite Regeneration

   When an ion exchange column is taken out of service
and  the regeneration process is initiated the sequence is
as follows (Figure  7):
   (1) The column is backwashed, upflow, at a rate of
approximately 8 gallons per square foot per minute.
   (2) The hot brine is pumped through heat exchangers
1 and 2 and  then  the cooler — which protects the ion
exchange  media  against  temperatures  in  excess  of
80 F —  and  up through  the  media.  The spent brine
returns through the heat exchangers and is discharged to
a storage tank.
   (3) After  a clean water  rinse  the ion  exchange
column is again ready for service.

   The spent  brine is rejuvenated by the following pro-
ceduie:
   (1) The pH of the spent brine is adjusted to 11.5 and
sodium carbonate is added. The CaCC>3 and Mg(OH)2
thus formed  is allowed  to concentrate  in  the  tank
bottom and then pumped to the sludge storage tank.
   (2) The desludged brine is then pumped  through heat
exchanger 1 or 2 and discharged to the stripping tower.
   (3) Steam is injected  into  the stripping tower at a
rate of approximately one pound per gallon of brine.
   (4) The volatile NH3  along  with water vapor are
discharged from the top of the tower to an air cooled
condenser.
                                                     24

-------
   (5) The condensate  discharges to a  receiver  at  a
concentration of about 1%NH3-N.
   (6) The regenerated   brine  is  pumped  from  the
bottom  of the stripping tower through the appropriate
heat exchanger and discharged to storage where the salt
concentration is adjusted to 1 normal NaCl.

   Sulfuric acid  and sodium hydroxide  are  added as
required for pH control in the two brine tanks.

PLANT PERFORMANCE

General

   The Rosemount AWTP was put into operation in mid
November  1973  and since that  time has been the only
treatment facility serving the City of Rosemount. During
the approximately 2 years of operation the facility has
produced  a high, although  somewhat variable, quality
effluent as illustrated by the monthly averages presented
in Figures 8, 9 and 10.
   The initial plant start-up which was supervised by the
contractor's  representatives  lasted  approximately  6
weeks.  Steady state operating  conditions were ap-
proached  in January 1975. During 1974, however, the
    plant was plagued by minor equipment failures that were
    related  to design and construction. As a result of these
    circumstances  a number  of operating  modes  were
    utilized throughout the year as required.
      All  of  the on-line  processes were operational in
    November   1973,  however,  the two  major  off-line
    processes, carbon regeneration and zeolite  regeneration,
    were not.  Several attempts  were made to regenerate
    carbon in November 1974 but because of the inability to
    maintain  adequate temperatures in  the  furnace   the
    carbon  was  only  partially regenerated. The first  suc-
    cessful  regenerations were made in January 1975.  The
    zeolite regeneration system has been  used on a sporadic
    basis only because of minor problems which were again
    related to design and construction.

    EPA GRANT PERIOD

    General

      In June,  1973 the  U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency  awarded  the   Metropolitan  Waste  Control
    Commission  a research and development grant.  The
    objectives of the grant are to: evaluate the independent
    physical-chemical treatment facility  at Rosemount  as a
25

-------
whole,  evaluate  the  individual unit  operations  and
processes, and  to determine the costs associated with
operation and  maintenance. The grant was officially
initiated on June 1,  1975. Under the terms of the grant
agreement  the  plant is currently being operated in a
number of modes for 8 week periods to determine the
affect of plant configuration on performance.

Sampling and Analysis

   Flow proportional composite samples of each process
effluent are collected  on a daily  basis.  The  routine
analyses and their frequency are presented in  Table 2.
Other analyses, such as hardness, sulfate, total solids and
heavy  metals,  are  made  on  a less  frequent  basis as
required.  The   analytical  procedures  utilized are as
described in Standard Methods  (1) or Methods for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (2). The total
phosphorus and Kjeldahl nitrogen samples are stored and
analyzed  on  a  weekly  basis  at  the MWCC central
laboratory  using automated chemistry techniques.  All
other analyses  with  the exception of heavy  metals are
performed at the Rosemount laboratory.
                                     TABLE 2
               SAMPLE - ANALYSIS FREQUENCY AT ROSEMOUNT AWTP
                                           Analyses per Week
                                Raw  Clar  DMFj^CC DMF2AEC    Eff
BOD - total
BOD _ filtrable*
COD - total
COD - filtrable*
TOC - total
TOC - filtrable*
Suspended solids
Phosphorus - total
total filtrable**
total ortho
filtrable ortho**
Nitrogen - Kjeldahl
— ammonia
PH
Alkalinity
Chloride
Temperature
Chlorine residual
Dissolved oxygen
*glass fiber filter
**0.45 filter
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
-
-


3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
-
-
3 3
3
3
7
-
-


3
-
3
3
3
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
7
-
-


3
3
3
3
3
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
7
-
-


3
-
3
-
-
3
3
-
-
-
-
3
3
3
-
-
7
-
-


-
-
-
-
-
3
3
-
-
-
-
3
3
3
3
.
7
-
-


 Steam
                                             Air Cooled
                                             Condenser
                                             Ammonia
                                             Solution
                        Heat Exchanger 1  or 2
                                                                      Heat Exchancjer
                              Soda
                              Ash
                                                               Salt
                              Spent Brine
                                 160°F
                               pH = 11.5
               Brine
             1 f!  NaCI
               170°F
             pH = 10.5
                                                                                           Ion
                                                                                           Exchi.r
                                                                                           Column
                       Sludge
                                                                      Heat  Exchanger
                                                                                                      -Cooler

                                                                                                    Fron Filtc
                                                                                                    Water  Scor
                                              To  ;il ter Hater
                                              Scoraqo 1
                   Rosoi'iount AWfP
Zeolite Regeneration System

        Figure  7
                                                      26

-------
Operating Conditions

General
   During the 8 week period June 7, 1975 to August 1,
1975, the plant was operated as follows:
                 clarifier -  lime to pH 10.5, ferric chloride, polymer
                 DMFj   -  in service
                 GCC    -  2 columns, upflow, series
                 DMF2   -  in service
                 AEC    -  in service when available
300


200
CO
CO
1OO


0
v>









'*'''
J









-*«
F










M

—








A
1C










M
57
i —









J
A










J









r-K
A



—






S

— i








O










N






.
w
1
i

C






S
3
u
i.

)


r*i







J

Ra
X







F

w








M




—




—
A
...-i


-^





G
1
M
Q7



—






J
^










J



—






A










SO N D
                         Rosenount AUTP
MONTHLY AVERAGE SUSPENDED SOLIDS CONCENTRATIONS
              Figure 8
                       3QQ
— ..— -..-^.
2QQ

Q
O
CD

10Q


0









_
















1 	










	



•M
C
01
t
c
IQ
i
— —









IS" -'

T-
















— 1

1














^P * "^*^













i
u




s_
QJ
i
(.


j

Raw
X







-^
i1'
-^rw^i
1
—








—










_n





i
— i
r-,
I 	


I
—
-U
*^°"^|___J ' -mrf^n^wj
JFMAMJJASONDJ FMAMJJASOND
                           fiosmunt ,'iMT?
  MONTHLY AVERAGE BOD5 CONCENTRATIONS
            Figure 9


               27

-------
  ID.
 CL

 ra
                 UH
    J FMAMJ J  ASONDJ FMAMJJ ASON
          19 74	1.	
   During this period the raw flow averaged 221,430 gal
per day and the clarifier flow 277,350 gal per day.  The
sources  of recycle flow  in the plant include backwash,
rinse and sample streams.
Clarifier
  The average chemical dosages to the  clarifier  are
tabulated below:
   ferric chloride
   lime
   polymer-Nalco 677
   acid
42 mg/1 FeCl3 or 14 mg/1 Fe
560mg/lCa(OH)2or424
   mg/1 CaO
2.9 mg/1
20,160 lbH2SO4 used
   The pH in the  mixing zone or draft tube was main-
tained at 10.5 based on average of 1290 hourly samples.
Approximately 400,000 gal  of sludge were  removed
from the clarifier at an average concentration of 4.6%.
Filters
   First stage filters number  3  and 4 and second stage
filters number 7 and 8 (all in train 2) were used during
the 8 week period. Because of the limited capacity to
store backwash water in the plant the following schedule
was adopted:
      filter backwash          —  day shift
      carbon column backwash  —  3-11 shift
      zeolite regeneration      —  11-7 shift
   The filters are backwashed in the morning so that the
backwash pit, which is  used to store backwash water
prior to recycle to  the wet well, can be emptied by
1200-1400  hrs.  The raw flow to the plant generally
starts to increase from a low  of about 50 gal per min to
250 gal  per min  at this time. Additional filter back-
washing  may be required during the day depending on
flow  and clarifier  performance. The backwash require-
ments of  the four  filters for  the  8 week period are
tabulated below:
                                                              Filter No.
                                                                 3
                                                                 4
                                                                 7
                                                         No. of Backwash Cycles
                                                                 77
                                                                 77
                                                                 59
                                                                 58
The   backwash  water  requirement  amounted to  ap-
proximately 8.2% of the raw flow.
Carbon Columns
   Carbon columns No. 4 and 5 were used during the 8
week test period. Both columns were put in service May
3, 1975, freshly regenerated, in the series, upflow mode.
Previous experience illustrated  that a backwash  fre-
quency of approximately once every 5 to 7 days was
sufficient to limit biological  growth and the associated
problem of hydrogen sulfide generation.
Column No. 4 was backwashed 11 times and No. 5,  10
times  during  the  8 week period. The  backwash  water
requirement  amounted to  approximately 1.5%  of  the
raw flow.
Ion Exchange Columns
The ion exchange  columns were in service for only 22
days  during  the  8 week  period.  The  ion  exchange
columns  themselves were available  for service  but a
number of failures in  the  zeolite regeneration system
caused the prolonged down time.
Laboratory Data
The laboratory data summary is presented in Table  3.
For the 8 week period the removal efficiencies were:
    Suspended Solids  -    98%
    BOD            -    93%
    Total P           -    95%
    NH3-N           -    21%

TABLE 3
ROSEMOUNT AWTP LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY
           (June 7 to August 1, 1975)
                                pH
                                Alkalinity -
                                Hardness -
                                Chloride
                                Suspended Solids
                                Turbidity - FTU
                                BOD - total
                                BOD - filtrable
                                COD - total
                                COD - filtrable
                                TOC - total (3)
                                TOC - filtrable (3)
                                P - Total
                                P - total filtrable
                                P - total ortho
                                P - filtrable ortho
                                Kjeldahl N

                                Notes
                                   (1)    temp recorders out of service
                                   (2)    DMF2 and AEC samples out of service
                                   (3)    TOC analyzer out of service for 2 weeks
Concentration -
Raw
7.7
i C03 397
:Os 306
267
ds 193
^U
151
3 39
382
B 111
) 77
i (3) 32
11.7
ble 8.3
9.1
tho 8.0
34
mg/1 at Sample Location
Clar
7.5
79
201
314
9
6
21
18
67 6
47
19
15
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.02
-
DMFj
7.6
-
-
-
5
4
16
-
57
44
16
15
-
-
-
-
-
GCC
7.6
-
-
-
7
6
14
10
42
25
10
8
-
-
-
-
-
Eff
7.7
75
187
351
4
5
11
8
36
25
9
8
0.6
0.4
0.3
22
22
                                                     28

-------
These data again illustrate that the major portion of the
removals of suspended solids, BOD and total phosphorus
were accomplished in the clarification process.

Organic removal across  the carbon columns  does  not
appear encouraging.  The effluent BOD of 11 iin Table 3
is slightly higher than the plant design standard. This was
partially  due  to an operational  error when  a  pH
controller was inadvertently left in the standby position
for a period  of about 15 hours. The high pH feed to the
carbon columns  caused desorption of organics and the
effluent BOD rose  to 37  and  22 mg/1 for  two days
before returning  to below 10 mg/1. The average effluent
BOD was  10 mg/1 when these two days are discounted.
During the 22 days the  ammonia removal system was in
service, removals of approximately  60% were  accom-
plished. The low removal  efficiencies were apparently
caused by failure of the zeolite regeneration system to
achieve complete regenerations.

Costs
A  separate cost  accounting system was set up  at the
Rosemount AWTP.  The  plant was divided into 17 cost
centers  as illustrated in Table 4. Fifteen  of the cost
centers  are defined  by physical boundaries.  One cost
center, Laboratory Service, is defined by function. The
last cost center, Indirect Services,  is used to identify
charges that  cannot  reasonably be identified with direct
plant operation.

During normal operation the  three major  costs for  a
                                  plant of this type are chemicals, labor and power. For
                                  the 8 week period, June 7 to August 1, 1975, these three
                                  categories accounted for 82% of the total operations and
                                  maintenance costs, labor - 70%, chemicals -  7%, and
                                  power - 5%. A chemical inventory is completed every
                                  two weeks and usage  determined. All MWCC employees
                                  at the plant fill out two time cards on a biweekly basis,
                                  the regular time card for pay purposes and a second card
                                  to identify hours in  the  various cost centers. Electric
                                  power and fuel usage are metered at the plant entrance
                                  but not at the appropriate cost center.  Fuel usuage in
                                  the appropriate cost centers is readily estimated however
                                  and  electric  power  measurement  instrumentation is
                                  currently being installed on the larger motors.
                                  Labor is by far the major cost factor for the Rosemount
                                  AWTP. The operations and maintenance staff consists of
                                  4  operators,  4  assistant  operators, 1  pipefitter, 1
                                  electrician, 2 laborers. A full time supervisor directs the
                                  operating staff. The plant is staffed  by  a minimum of
                                  two men  around the clock. Maintenance  is  generally
                                  performed during the day shift. The staffing require-
                                  ments of the various cost centers are presented in Table
                                  5. Time spent by the  operator at the plant control panel
                                  is  charged  to Indirect Services. The two  plant processes
                                  that require the most labor time are clarification (cost
                                  center 30) and  clinoptilolite regeneration (cost center
                                  120). It is quite  possible that  the distribution of labor
                                  time throughout  the plant will change  considerably
                                  when all of the 'bugs' are worked out of the individual
                                  processes.
Table 4
COST CENTER
      10

      20
      30
      40
      50
      60
      70
      80
      90
     100

     110
     120
     130
     140
     150
     160

     170
Title and Description
PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - plant inlet to discharge to wet well, includes flow
measurement, bar screens, raw sampling pump
INFLUENT PUMPING STATION - wet well to discharge to SCC
CLARIFICATION & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL - inlet to SCC to weir box on SCC
FILTRATION-1 - weir box on SCC to discharge to Storage^ 1
CARBON ADSORPTION - storage-1  to weir box feeding 2nd stage filters
FILTRATION-2 - weir box to and including storage—2
AMMONIA REMOVAL — ion exchange pumps to discharge from building
CHLORINATION - chlorine system for disinfection and odor control
EFFLUENT DISPOSAL - building to outfall
SLUDGE HANDLING & DISPOSAL - blowdown line (outside SCC) to discharge from
truck
CARBON REGENERATION - transfer and regeneration
CLINOPTILOLITE REGENERATION
AMMONIA RECOVERY SYSTEM  - condenser and storage tank
AMMONIA DISPOSAL  - disposition of stored ammonia solution
LABORATORY SERVICES - sampling, analysis, monitoring
BUILDING & GROUNDS - general systems including water, drain, compressed air,
heating, ventilation, cleaning, etc.
INDIRECT SERVICES  - nondirect labor, plant supervision, project  supervision, clerical
labor, data processing and other indirect services
                                                    29

-------
Table 5
             Cost Center
Man Hours* (June 7 to Aug 1, 1975)
  10—   Preliminary Treatment
  20 -   Influent Pumping Station
  30 -   Clarification & P Removal
  40 -   Filtration - 1
  50 -   Carbon Adsorption
  60 -   Filtration - 2
  70 —   Ammonia Removal
  80 —   Chlorination
  90 -   Effluent Disposal
 100 -   Sludge Handling & Disposal
 110 -   Carbon Regeneration
 120 —   Clinoptilolite Regeneration
 130 -   Ammonia Recovery System
 140 —   Ammonia Disposal
 150—   Laboratory Service
 160 -   Building & Grounds
 170—   Indirect Service

 * excludes vacation, sick leave, clearical and supervision

The total cost of operating and maintaining the facility
for the 8 week period on an actual flow basis was $4.82
per  1,000 gallons.  The unit cost  is extremely  high
because  the  plant  capacity and  plant  flow  are  low
enough to preclude  any economy related to size, yet the
plant complexity requires  full staffing.  For plants  of
moderate size, 5 to  10 MGD, and similar design the unit
cost  of  treatment  would  be  reduced substantially.
Although power  costs  may be proportional  to flow,
chemical unit costs decrease significantly when carload
deliveries are possible. From experience to date it  does
not  apperat  that labor  requirements will be directly
related to flow. If the plant  had  treated the design  flow
of 600,000 gal/day  for the 8 week period the  unit cost
of treatment would have been $2.16/100 gal  assuming
labor cost  constant, chemical and power cost directly
proportional  to  flow  and  other miscellaneous costs
constant.

If  the capacity  and flow to the present  facility was
increased to 2 MGD by using larger units rather than  by
adding more units of the present size, the staffing level
required probably would not increase by more  than 2 or
3 persons. It is obvious  that as the plant capacity and
flow increase the operation and maintenance man  hour
requirements  per unit  of  flow  decreases  thus  further
decreasing the unit cost of treatment.

SUMMARY

The 0.6  MGD Rosemount AWTP was constructed by the
Metropolitan  Sewer  Board  (now  Metropolitan Waste
          maintenance w/o operation
 110
  25
 540
  58
  58
 133
  32
  25
    8
  40
  24
 521
  85
  23
 937
1,249
 970
  Control Commission) to protect potential recreational
  waters adjacent to the Mississippi River and to evaluate
  the  feasibility  and  economics  of the unit processes
  employed. The plant was put into service in November
  1973 and since that time has been the only treatment
  facility  serving the City of Rosemount. The plant has
  consistently discharged a high quality effluent.

  A  demonstration  project  jointly  sponsored  by  the
  USEPA and MWCC  was initiated in June  of 1975. The
  purpose of the project is to evaluate the unit operation
  and unit processes utilized at the Rosemount AWTP and
  to determine the costs associated with the operation and
  maintenance of the facility.

  Operating experience to date illustrates that concentra-
  tions of suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand
  and total  phosphorus can be maintained  at levels of 5
  mg/1,  10 mg/1   and  1  mg/1  respectively. The  ion
  exchange  system used to remove  ammonia nitrogen has
  not yet demonstrated its effectiveness because of numer-
  ous  problems  with  the  zeolite regeneration  system.
  Although the unit cost of treatment is extremely high at
  the current facility it is obvious that larger plants  of the
  same general design would operate at considerably lower
  unit cost because of economic factors related to scale.

                     REFERENCES
  (I)Standard Methods for the Examination  of Water and Waste-
     water, 18th ed., APHA,  1971
  (2) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and  Wastes, USEPA,
     1974
                                                      30

-------
                            TREATMENT  OF CHEMICAL PLANT EFFLUUENTS
                                               M.N. Levchenko
   Science and technology advance giving rise to a swift
growth  of production  volume  during  recent  decades
makes  the  problem of  pollution  control  especially
serious. Water pollution becomes so high that it appears
to be harmful and  even disastrous for water reservoirs
and has an adverse effect on human's health. This leads
to the depletion  of river, lake and underground water
sources on  which  the  modern water  management  is
based.
   Though  our  country occupies one  of the first  places
in the  world as far as fresh water resources is concerned,
uneven distribution across the territory of the USSR and
a  continuous growth of water  consumption  require a
search  for ways of economic consumption of fresh water
and efficient treatment of effluents.
   Chemical industry is one  of the largest consumers of
water and at the same time it disposes  to water reservoirs
large amounts of effluents.
   In a great majority  of chemical   processes  water is
widely used for cooling, material handling and directly
in technological processes.   At the  same  time various
substances are used at  chemical  plants as raw materials,
intermediates and final  products; part of them goes with
effluents to water reservoirs.
   As  a result the chemical industry  being no leader in
terms of pollution quantities is among the  first as far as
pollutants range is concerned.
   The USSR for a long time has laws strictly limiting
pollution  with  effluents. In recent years the legislative
bodies of the USSR and  Union republics have adopted
still  stricter laws  relating  to  pollution  control  and
economical use of natural resources.
   For example,  in accordance  with  published in 1975
new "Regulations  for  surface  water Protection from
Pollution  with  effluents"  in case of  disposal to a water
reservoir of several  substances with the same permissible
concentration and  taking into  account the pollutants
already disposed  to the water reservoir from other
outlets the sum of concentration ratios
                                                 ) of
each substance in the water reservoir to the correspond-
ing maximum permissible  concentrations
should  not exceed 1:
           Cl  +-  C*  4. ... +.   C» ._ < 1
   Taking into account a large range of pollutants at the
chemical plants to be treated it is hardly permissible to
dispose  even  biologically treated effluents to rivers and
other water reservoirs.
   Until recently a  rapid growth of production volume
and range of chemicals produced was accompanied by an
almost proportional growth of fresh water consumption
and effluents amounts. However recent years witnessed a
clear  trend towards the reduction  of fresh water con-
sumption owing to
   a)  the  development  and use of new and improved
traditional  technological processes without effluent for-
mation and with minimum water consumption:
   b)  maximum use of closed water circulation systems;
   c)  use  in  each technological process of local waste
water recycling with water treatment  at a given process
stage and treated water recycling to the process;
   d)  after-treatment and  recycling  to the process of
effluents including conditionally clean and storm water;
   e) a wider use of air cooling instead of water cooling,
etc.
   Work being  done in  this  direction  gives  certain
positive results.  Thus during 1971-75 in spite of appre-
ciable  growth  of  chemical  production  volume  fresh
water consumption in the chemical industry as  a whole
remained at 1970 level.
   Today  biological  treatment is the  main  type of
effluent  treatment at the chemical  plants.  Practically
each plant has its biological treatment facilities or  sends
the effluents to  the municipal treatment plant. As a rule
biological treatment of industrial effluents is conducted
together with the treatment of industrial and municipal
sewage. Effluents and sewage ratio varies greatly  from
1:3 to  1:10  depending on the amount  and  type of
pollutants  in industrial  effluents, total amount  of sew-
age, etc. Treatment efficiency is usually 95:98 per cent.
In our opinion good prospects exist for after-treatment
of biologically  treated waste water with its further use
for industrial water supply. At Severodonetsk chemical
plant  it is  already for a long  time that biologically
treated  waste water is recycled to the process. Industrial
sewage  and effluents and municipal sewage are treated
together at the biological  treatment  facilities with the
capacity  of  about  100000  m /day. The biological
treatment  complex includes  mechanical treatment of
industrial sewage,  mechanical  treatment  of industrial
effluents, biological treatment  including treatment of
residue. After-treatment is carried out in two-step buffer
ponds with total surface area of 16 ha. After three-days
residence  of biologically treated waste water in buffer
ponds it  is  delivered to  the  industrial  water supply
filtration  plant  and then to the  additional feeding of
water  circulation  systems.  Control  of technological
processes  and treatment degree is carried out by chem-
ical and bacteriological laboratories.  According to the
analysis  the  efficiency  of biochemical  treatment of
sewage  and effluents amounts  to 97-98 per cent and is
characterized by  the following values: biochemical oxy-
gen demand(<5/WcJ -4-H2 mg/1,suspended substances-7-12
mg/1, chlorides  -  150 mg/1, sulphates - 100  mg/1,
temperature - 20-22°C, pH - 7-8. This water before the
delivery  to  the  additional  feeding of water circulation
systems is treated with ozone in special contact tanks for
additional treatment from organic contaminants and for
avoiding of biological overgrowing of cooling towers and
                                                       31

-------
other parts of water circulation systems.
   At  the synthetic fibre plant in Chernigov there  are
biological treatment facilities with the capacity of 80000
m^/day. They simultaneously  treat  68000  m-^/day of
municipal  sewage  and  12000  m-'/day of industrial
sewage and eflluents.  After-treatment is carried  out in
three-step cascade  bioponds with  total area of  40  ha.
Waste  water from biological treatment facilities contains
20-70  mg/1 of suspended substances; BriKf is 14-18 mg/1.
After  biological ponds the concentration of suspended
substances lowers to 8-20 mg/l,EflKfto 8-12 mg/1. After
the additional treatment in bioponds 12000  rn^/day of
waste  water are recycled to the process and used for soft
water preparation.
   Two-step   after-treatment   of  biologically  treated
waste  water is used at nitrogen plant in Dorogobooge.
The 1st  step-metallic drum filters with filter cloth  cell
size 0,5x0,5  mm. The 2nd step-sand filters  filled with
16-32  mm gravel  up  to 0,65 m and  with  1-2,5  mm
quartz sand up to 1,2  m. Filtering rate in sand filters -
6-8  m/hr, filtering time - 12-14  hrs, washing  rate -
13-15  I/sec,  m^  washing  time — 6-7  min.  Washing is
carried out with filtered water which is then delivered to
the  head of  treatment  facilities.  Biologically treated
waste  water   contains  up to  50  mg/1  of  suspended
substances;  EDKy    is  15-20 mg/1. After  additional
treatment the concentration of suspended  substances
lowers to 5-6 mg/1, EDK,-    lowers to 4-5 mg/1 and
after mixing  with  fresh  river water the waste water is
sent to  the  water treatment  plant  and  then  to  the
additional  feeding of water  circulation  systems  and
covering other production requirements.
   The experience of the Ministry for Chemical Industry
shows sufficient  reliability and efficiency of biological
treatment of all the sewage and effluents of a  chemical
plant with their further after-treatment and recycling for
industrial water supply. However this is true  for  ammo-
nia, synthetic fibre and  certain other plants where  the
amount and contamination of industrial waste water are
relatively low.  For plants producing  organic, chloro-
organic  and  other products giving a large  amount of
waste  water and a large range of pollutants the optimum
variant  in  our  opinion  would  be  that  of a local
physico-chemical treatment of industrial waste water in
all  the water-demanding technological processes using
their own water circulation system. Industrial  sewage
and partially  industrial  effluents should be treated at
all-plant treatment facilities when a local treatment is
undesirable.
   In the USSR there was developed a complex  route for
treatment  and  recycling  of  waste  water  of a large
production plant  without disposal to open water reser-
voirs.  The  complex  route  includes the  use  of local
treatment plants in the  production of suspension poly-
styrene, chlorine  and caustic soda  by  a  diaphragm
method  and  acetylene by a thermal oxidative  pyrolysis
of natural gas. The waste water treated at local plants is
recycled  to the  water circulation system  and to the
production process.
   The waste water unfit for recycling is separated into
four types:
   - organic polluted
   - mineral polluted — above 3 g/1
   - mineral polluted - under 3 g/1
   sewage,
   Mineral-polluted waste  water  with mineral content
above 3  g/1  after treatment  (softening,  separation of
suspended substances, conversion of insoluble salts into
soluble  ones)  is  sent  to a demineralization unit with
7-step evaporation in  vertical film-type vessels. Deminer-
alized water  with total salt  content  up to 50 mg/1  is
used for feeding  boilers at a central heating-and-power
plant  and  for process requirements.  Concentrated salt
solutions with salt content  up to  50 g/1, formed during
demineralization, are  pumped into deep layers of earth's
crust. Pumping is carried out to the depth of 1650-1750
m where  stratal  water was found with the  same salt
composition but  with a higher concentration  — up to
150 g/1.
   Organic-polluted water and sewage (of the production
plant  and  municipal) are  sent to  biological treatment
plant where they  undergo separate mechanical treatment
and then  joint biological treatment; after that they are
sent to a buffer pond.
   Waste  water with  mineral content  up to 3 g/1 and
storm (rain)  water are sent to the same buffer  pond
without preliminary treatment.
   The complex route includes after-treatment of biolog-
ically treated and low-mineral waste water at adsorption
and ion-exchange units with the production of nitrogen
fertilizers  from solutions used for regeneration of ion-
exchange resins.
   Treated waste water from the  buffer pond with salt
content up to 1500 mg/1  and chemical oxygen demand
XflK— 30-  130 mg/1 is delivered to an adsorption unit for
the separation of chloroorganic and other pollutants. An
adsorbent  is  an  activated  anthracite  with 0,25-1 mm
particle size.  Activated carbon   is suspended in the
adsorber with constant relative expansion of adsorbent
bed being ^  =1,5.
          Nc
   Spent  activated anthracite  is  discharged  from the
lower part of the adsorber and sent to a vacuum filter
for water  separation and then it is delivered to a reactor
of  adsorbent  thermal regeneration.  Regeneration  is
carried out at 850-950T by a mixture of stack gases and
steam. Activated  anthracite losses during the cycle (up
to  10 per cent  of  adsorbent being  regenerated) are
compensated using an anthracite activation unit.
   Water after adsorption treatment goes to quartz press
filters for separation  of entrained carbon dust (particles
up  to 0,25 mm) and then to rapid filters.  Waste  water
treatment in  prefilters and rapid filters is improved by
means of polyacrylamide  introduction (up to  2 g/m^).
                                                       32

-------
Filtering rate in press filters and rapid filters is the same
— 8 m^/m^hr. The filters are periodically washed with a
reverse  water  current. Washing water  is separated from
suspended carbon in precipitation tanks and recycled.
   Waste  water free  of organic impurities and carbon
dust is delivered to the ion-exchange unit for lowering of
salt content.
   A high-acid cationite KY-2 is used as cation-exchange
resin and a high-base anionite  AB-17-8  is used as  an
anion-exchange resin. At H-cationation cationites Ca++,
Mg++ and partially Na+ are extracted from the waste
water.  After  H-cationation  water  is  separated  from
carbon  dioxide in a degasing vessel  by venting off with
air. Water being separated of carbon dioxide undergoes
OH-anionation and then is used for additional feeding of
water  circulation   systems and  for other  production
requirements.
   H-cationite  filters are  regenerated  with 25 per cent
nitric acid;  spent  regeneration  solution  passes succes-
sively through 4  receivers, the  capacity of each  being
about % of the volume of all the regeneration solution.
Solution  from the second receiver,  the most saturated
with salts, is delivered  to a mixer-neutralizer. Solutions
from the  other receivers are successively used for further
regeneration.
   OH-anionite filters are regenerated with 10 per cent
ammonia  liquor. The most concentrated solution after
OH-filters regeneration passes to the  mixer-neutralizer
where the mixture pH is raised to 7 adding, if necessary,
25  per cent nitric  acid or 10 per cent  ammonia liquor.
   As a result of reaction  between  (NH^SC^ and
Ca(NC>3)2 sludge CaSC>4 2^0 is formed in the neutral-
izer; it is accumulated in the precipitation tank, centrifu-
gated for separation of solution and sent to heap.
   The neutralized solution and  centrifugate are collect-
ed in tanks from which they are continuosly sent to  the
production of mineral fertilizers. The fertilizers contain
nitrates  of ammonium, calcium,  magnesium, sodium,
calcium sulfate  and other compounds. Total fertilizer
nitrogen content is about 30 per cent.
   Local plants are rather complicate treatment facilities
providing  for waste water treatment,  after-treatment,  use
and utilization of sludge  and other wastes,  etc. Thus
waste water formed  in acetylene production contains
carbon  black, resin, phenol and other substances. The
treatment is  carried out  in horizontal  vessels  where
carbon black conies to the surface  and by means of a
rake conveyor is delivered to a mixer and then to a waste
combustion  unit.  Water  passed through carbon black
separators contains residual carbon black  as wwell  as
resins, phenols, aromatic compounds and other products
of incomplete  combustion and  methane pyrolysis.  Be-
cause of the lack of treatment methods such waste water
is repeatedly  used in a separate  waste  water circulation
system.   Owing to  water  evaporation  in  the  water
circulation system  because  of cooling  salt  content,
hardness,  alkalinity, etc.  rise and this has an adverse
effect  on the production process. To stabilize recycled
water composition it is necessary to continuously purge
the  circulation system.  However because  of  a high
concentration of pollutants in the recycled water it is
not allowed to send it to biological treatment or dispose
it  directly to a water reservoir. That is why the following
after-treatment was suggested:
   a) coagulation in  a suspended  bed in clarifier using
coagulants  of aluminium sulphate, ferric sulphate and
chloride. To keep the necessary pH value 5 per cent lime
milk is fed to the  clarifier. Waste water treatment is
effected by means  of coagulation on  flake surface and
adsorption by flake  is effected by means of filtering
large carbon  black  particles and small coagulant  flakes
through the suspended bed.
   Sludge formed during treatment (its volume is 0,2-0,5
per cent of the volume of water being treated) contains
carbon  black, phenols, resins, etc; it  is  separated from
water in drum vacuum filters and sent  to  heap.
   b) waste water treated in a suspended bed is delivered
to  a contact  vessel  for  treatment   with ozone that
bubbles through the water layer. Ozone concentration is
20-30 mg/1.
   Bubbling is effected  through  the  system of porous
porolit  pipes  that allows to use  all the ozone. Ozone-
treated water is recycled to  acetylene  production for
cooling of heat exchangers.
   Investments in water supply and treatment facilities
of  a  production   plant  are   lowered  owing  to  the
reduction of  fresh  water consumption by 36  per cent
and  possibility of nitrogen  fertilizer  production makes
operation  of  treatment  facilities profitable  because
operating expenditure would be justified by the cost of
fertilizers.
   Development of  a complex route allowing to com-
pletely  eliminate waste water disposal  to  water reservoirs
indicates practical and economic way for solution of one
of the most  acute problems — that of control  of water
pollution with industrial effluents and economic use of
water resources.
   As far as  mineral  fertilizer plants is concerned there
was  also developed a water supply route  providing for
industrial waste water  treatment  and recycling. These
plants are characterized by use of large amounts of water
for  cooling  and  as  a rule   they  have large   water
circulation  systems.  Water circulation systems  are con-
tinuously fed  with  fresh  water  to compensate  losses
from evaporation,  spray  carrying away and water re-
moval  to keep constant salt concentration of recycled
water.
   Large amounts of water  are also used in production
processes for scrubber refluxing when removing exhaust
gases, for washing of pipelines and vessels, for phospho-
rus washing in storage tanks and precipitators, for dust
removal, etc.  Main pollutants  in  waste  water  here  are
phosphorus compounds,  phenols, cyanides, fluorides,
etc.
                                                        33

-------
   Experience  of operating  mineral fertilizer  plants
shows that it is enough to separate from recycled water
only those impurities that may complicate the produc-
tion process. Thus instead of deep treatment to sanitary
limits it is acceptable to carry out treatment to a degree
allowing to  recycle  water  to various  processes.  So
phosphorus concentration may be 10  mg/1, that of
suspended  substances -  up  to  100  mg/1;  fluorine
concentration 20-30 mg/1. This is much higher than the
sanitary regulations allow  and such water should not be
disposed to open water reservoirs but it may be recycled.
   According to this route treatment plants consist of a
neutralization unit with the necessary reagent equipment
and facilities  for various  mechanical  and  physico-
chemical treatment of waste water.
    Industrial effluents giving as a rule acid reaction (pH
= 1-5)  are  delivered to  a horizontal sand trap for  the
precipitation  of  large-size mechanical impurities. Then
the effluents  are sent to  a tank for  averaging of waste
water amount and composition and levelling out of peak
concentrations of impurities including acids. Averaging is
carried  out for 8 hours.  The averaging tank consists of
two sections with  corrosion-proof coating. There  are
perforated vinyl pipes on the  bottom of the tank for
compressed air delivery (air pressure being 10m of water
gaugs).  The air contributes to better averaging and acid
gas  venting off. Air  flow rate is 2 m-* per 1 m^ of the
averaging  tanks  surface  area. Waste  water  with  the
averaged composition comes to a mixer where  10 per
cent lime  milk  is   continuously  added. There  is  an
automatic pH-meter  at the mixer outlet for the control
of lime milk supply. Waste water from the mixer goes to
the precipitator  where 0,5  per cent polyacrylamide is
added to improve precipitation efficiency and accelerate
phase separation. 20-50 g of polyacrylamide are  added
per 1  tonne  of dry matter  of waste water suspended
substances. Polyacrylamide addition  is controlled auto-
matically depending  on the amount of waste water to be
treated. Neutralization reaction is completed  in a reac-
tion chamber  presenting a round concrete tank with a
capacity - 200 m^. Normal waste water residence time in
the reaction chamber is 30 min. Waste water mixing is
carried  out  by compressed air  delivered by  means of
perforated vinyl pipes. After the reaction chamber waste
water is sent to 1250 up horizontal precipitators for the
precipitation of  suspended substances. Normal waste
water residence  time  in precipitators -  4 hours.  The
neutralized waste water being  clarified, sludge is collect-
ed in the lower conical part of the precipitators (sludge
humidity  is 85-95  per cent). Clarified waste water is
recycled to the production process.
   Sludge  undergoes mechanical water removal in drum
vacuum filters. Filtering area of each vacuum  filter  - 10
m^, vacuum is kept to be 350-420 mm Hg, filter deposit
height - 6-8 mm. Dewa
   Irretrievable  water  losses  with  sludge,  during  slag
granulation, etc. prevent accumulation of undesirable
impurities in a closed water circulation systems. Experi-
ence gained at mineral fertilizer plants indicated possi-
bility  of  water  circulation  system  with a negative
balance, i.e. under such conditions when a closed system
should be continuosly fed with water from outer water
supply sources. As  a such a source it is suggested to use
water removed from circulation system  to keep constant
salt composition of recycled cooling water.
   Today  some mineral fertilizer plants are being con-
verted to  water supply  routes  without  waste water
disposal.
   Practically at each chemical plant there may be used
one of  the above-described water supply  routes charac-
terized by absence of waste water disposal to open water
reservoirs  and minimum consumption of fresh water
mainly  for additional  feeding  of  water circulation
systems and for covering central heating-and-power plant
requirements.  According to the next five-year plan for
1976-1980  wide use  of such  routes is  planned  at
chemical plants.
                                                       34

-------
               THE ROLE OF ACTIVATED CARBON IN PHYSICO-CHEMICAL TREATMENT(*)

                                            Walter J. Weber, Jr.(**)
INTRODUCTION

   Activated carbon is utilized  in a number of environ-
mental process applications. Purification of gases with
activated  carbon  is   an  effective  technique  for  air
pollution control, adsorption of dissolved impurities on
carbon is widely  employed for water purification, and
adsorption  on  carbon  is  an integral  part of  most
physicochemical  process schemes for wastewater treat-
ment and water reclamation.
   The reasons for the choice of activated carbon as an
adsorbent in  these applications are several fold. Carbon
has been demonstrated to  have good sorption charac-
teristics for most organic compounds of interest in these
fields. This is attributable to its dual properties of large
surface area per unit weight (and bulk volume) and high
degree of  surface  activity.  It can  be  produced with
relative  ease and at reasonable cost from  a  number of
different raw  materials and with a variety of surface
properties  to meet the requirements of specific applica-
tions. Finally, activated carbon - particularly granular
activated carbon  - can be  efficiently regenerated  for
multiple  reuse  as an adsorbent. Despite  exhaustive
searches  for  alternatives,  no other material has been
found  which combines the  desirable  properties of an
adsorbent as effectively as does activated carbon.
   This  paper discusses salient features of the role of
activated carbon  in physicochemical  treatment systems
for municipal and industrial wastewaters, highlighting
advantages  over other purification processes, and defin-
ing factors and considerations involved in the use of
carbon adsorption systems.

PRINCIPLES OF ADSORPTION
   Adsorption occurs  in large measure as a resultant of
forces active  within phase boundaries, or surface bound-
aries. These  forces  result in characteristic boundary
energies. Classical chemistry defines the properties of a
system  by the   properties  of its mass;  for surface
phenomena the  significant properties are those of the
surface or boundary.
   Pure liquids tend to reduce their free surface energy
through the action of  surface tension. A large number of
soluble  materials (e.g., detergents) can effectively alter
the  surfaces  tension  of a liquid.  A material  which is
active at surfaces will  decrease the tension at the surface
of a liquid by  virtue of its movement to the surface.
(*) Presented at the U.S./U.S.S.R. Symposium  on  Physical-
    Chemical  Treatment of  Wastewaters, Environmental  Re-
    search Center,  Cincinnati, Ohio, November 12-14,  1975.
(**) Professor of Environmental and Water Resources Engineer-
    ing  and Chairman,  Water Resources Program, College of
    Engineering,  The  University of Michigan,  Ann Arbor,
    Michigan, U.S.A.
Migration to the  surface or boundary results in a net
reduction of the work required  to  enlarge the surface
area, the reduction being proportional to the concentra-
tion of sorbate at  the surface. Hence the energy balance
of  the system favors  the  adsorptive  concentration  of
such surface-active substances at the phase interface. The
tendency of an impurity to lower the surface tension of
water  is referred  to  as hydrophobicity; that is,  the
impurity "dislikes" water.
   Adsorption of a dissolved impurity from water onto
activated carbon may result from the hydrophobicity of
the impurity, or it may be  caused by  a high affinity of
the solute for the  carbon.  For the majority of systems
encountered  in water  and  waste treatment,  adsorption
results from a combination of these factors.
   The solubility of a substance in  water is  significant;
solubility can be  thought  of  as  the chemical compati-
bility  between the water   and the solute.  The  more
hydrophilic  the substance  the less likely it  is to  be
adsorbed. Conversely,  a hydrophobic  substance  will
more likely be adsorbed.
   In the context of solute affinity for the solid, it is
common to distinguish between three types of adsorp-
tion.  The  affinity may be predominantly due to:  1)
electrical attraction of the solute to  the sorbent (ex-
change adsorption); 2) van der Waals attraction (physical
or  ideal  adsorption); or, 3) chemical reaction  (chemi-
sorption  or chemical adsorption).
   Many adsorptions of organic substances by activated
carbon result from specific interactions between func-
tional  groups on the sorbate  and on the surface of the
sorbent.  These interactions  may be designated as "speci-
fic  adsorptions." It is possible  for specific adsorptions to
exhibit a large range  of binding energies, from values
commonly associated  with "physical"  adsorption  to
higher energies involved in "chemisorption." The adsorp-
tive interactions   of  aromatic  hydroxyl and nitro-
substitutes compounds with active carbon, for example,
are specific  adsorption processes  resulting from  the
formation of donor-acceptor complexes of the organic
molecule  with surface carbonyl  oxygen  groups, with
adsorption continuing after  these sites are exhausted via
complexation with the rings of the basal planes of the
carbon rmcrocrystallite.1
   Adsorption  results  in the  removal of solutes from
solution  and their concentration at a surface,  to such
time as the amount of solute remaining in solution is in
equilibrium with that at the surface. This equilibrium is
described by expressing  the amount of solute adsorbed
per unit  weight of sorbent  qe, as a function of C, the
concentration  of  solute  remaining  in  solution.  An
expression of this type  is termed an adsorption isotherm.
   The adsorption isotherm  is useful for representing the
                                                       35

-------
capacity of an activated carbon  for adsorbing organics
from  a  waste, and  in providing  description  of the
functional dependence of capacity on the concentration
of  pollutant.  The  steeper the  isotherm,  the more
effective is the activated carbon; that is, the sharper the
rise of the isotherm  to a given ultimate capacity as
concentration increases, the higher will be the effective
capacity  at  the concentration  level  desired  for the
treated water. Experimental determination  of the iso-
therm is routine practice in evaluating the feasibility of
adsorption for treatment,  in selecting a carbon, and in
estimating  carbon  dosage requirements.  Mathematic
description of the adsorption isotherm for a particular
system — that is, the functional dependence of capacity
of concentration —  is also required for development of
predictive  models for  design  applications.1-2   Details
of the conventional Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm
expressions are readily available  in  the literature.'1'
Mathews and  Weber have recently described the use of a
more   general  and  widely applicable three-parameter
isotherm model.3
   The adsorption  isotherm  relates to an  equilibrium
condition, however, and practical  detention times used
in most treatment applications do not provide sufficient
time  for true equilibrium to obtain. Rates of adsorption
are thus significant, for the more rapid the approach to
equilibrium, the greater is the fraction  of equilibrium
capacity  utilized  in a  given  contact time. There are
essentially three consecutive steps in the adsorption of
materials  from solution  by  porous  sorbents  such as
activated carbon. The  first of these is the transport of
the adsorbate through a surface film to  the exterior of
the adsorbent ("film diffusion").
    Film, penetration, boundary layer, and other theories
have  been postulated  to  explain  mass transfer in the
region  separating a  turbulent bulk solution and a solid
surface. However, the fluid mechanics of this region are
not well defined. Boundary layer theory accounts for  a
velocity  distribution  and  is more  realistic than  film
theory, which assumes a laminar  film surrounding the
particle.  The term "film diffusion"  is  used  here to
generally  describe the  resistance to mass transfer at the
surface of the particle. However, use of this term is not
intended to imply the existence of a definable film nor is
it meant to restrict  treatment of data to the film theory.
The second of the three consecutive steps in sorption by
porous sorbents, with  the exception of a small amount
of adsorption that occurs on the exterior surface of the
sorbent after  transport across  the  exterior film, is the
 diffusion of the sorbate within the pores of the sorbent
and/or  along  pore-wall   surfaces ("intraparticle dif-
 fusion").  The third and final step  is adsorption of the
 solute  on the interior surfaces  bounding the pore and
 capillary spaces of the sorbent.
    Consideration  of rates  at which interfacial  tensions
 are lowered  by chemical compounds representative  of
 organic pollution  materials  gives  indication  that  the
adsorption process itself is probably not rate-determin-
ing,  and that a much slower process must control the
overall rate of uptake by  porous carbon. Under certain
operating conditions, transport of the sorbate through
the "surface  film" or boundary layer to the sorbent may
be  rate-limiting; if sufficient turbulence  is  provided,
transport of the sorbate within the porous carbon may
control the rate  of uptake. One of the most significant
factors to  consider is, therefore, the nature of the step
which controls the speed at which the reaction proceeds,
in order that the process may be described in terms of
appropriate rate expressions and rate parameters.
   Certain  properties of  the  sorbate  are   useful  in
determining the nature of the rate-controlling step. For
example, if intraparticle transport determines the rate of
reaction, the size and structure of an  individual solute
ion or molecule will affect this rate to the extent that it
affects molecular mobility.
   The rate-controlling step can also  be characterized in
part  by the observed activation energy for the process. A
study of the effect of temperature on rate, in addition to
yielding  information  relative  to optimum conditions of
operation,  permits  evaluation of the activation energy
and  is,  consequently, a further means for determining
the nature of rate-limiting reactions.
   For a process in which the overall rate is controlled
by a strictly  adsorptive  reaction the variation  of rate
should be  directly proportional to  the concentration of
solute, and for very simple diffusion the rate is expected
also  to be proportional to  the first power of concentra-
tion. However,  complex  mathematic expressions for
intraparticle  transport  indicate  that  the  relationship
between concentration and the rate of the reaction will
not  be  one  of direct proportionality. 2'3  Since con-
centration  affects a number of the parameters of these
equations,  it is not possible to predict  an exact con-
centration-rate relation for this reaction. Qualitatively, if
diffusion of solute within the pores and capillaries of the
carbon  limits  the  rate,  the variation  of  rate  with
concentration is not expected to  be linear,  whereas a
direct proportionality is  anticipated  for strictly adsorp-
tive reactions. Thus the concentration-dependence of the
rate  of  reaction  may be used  as a  partial test  of
hypotheses regarding the  nature of the rate-controlling
step. The effect  of the concentration of solute on the
speed  at which its  sorptive  uptake proceeds  is also
significant  for  any  prediction of the most efficient
manner in  which adsorption  can be utilized for removal
of the solute  from solution.
   For processes in which the rate-limiting  reaction  is
adsorption on the exterior  surfaces of the  sorbent or
transport through  an external surface  film,  the rate  is
expected to vary as the reciprocal of the diameter of the
sorbent particles for a given total weight of sorbent; this
because  the  rate is in this case a first-order function of
exterior  surface area, which in turn is inversely propor-
tional  to  particle  diameter.  Conversely, according to
                                                       36

-------
appropriate  mathematical expressions  for transport re-
lationships, the rate of diffusion of solute into the pores
of a particle will vary as the reciprocal of some higher
power of the diameter of the particle.  Variation of rate
with particle size is then another method which is useful
for the characterization  of the  rate-limiting  step for  a
particular system. Particle size is an important considera-
tion also for achieving optimum utilization of a sorbent
in treatment operations.

COMPONENTS AND CONDITIONS

Properties of Activated Carbon

   Activated carbon  is a generic term for a broad range
of amorphous carbon-based  materials so prepared as to
exhibit  a  high  degree of porosity and  an extensive
associated surface area. Hundreds  of different  com-
mercial activated carbons with  unique properties, and
therefore different application suitability, exist.
   The  purification  properties  of carbons, or  at  least
charcoal, have been known for over 30 centuries, but the
first commercial  application appears to have been the
use of bone char for decolorization in the cane sugar
industry in  the  1780's, and bone char is  yet the most
commonly   used  sorbent in the cane sugar industry
today.'4)
   During  the  19th  century  different  relatively crude
activated carbons were prepared from  a variety of raw
materials, but manufacturing problems, and the absence
of a real need to find anything  significantly better  than
bone  char stifled product development. The first  acti-
vated carbon preparation and  use  for purification of
potable water occurred in 1862.1^'
   In the late 1890's and early 1900's Ostrejko develop-
ed  two improved processes for the  manufacture of
activated carbon.(*>' The first involved the carbonization
of vegetable substances impregnated  with metallic chlo-
rides; the second the activation  of charcoal with carbon
dioxide and  steam at high temperatures. Virtually all
activated carbons are yet made  by  one or the other of
these  two processes,  either  low temperature chemical
activation  or high temperature  gaseous oxidation. The
low temperature  chemical activation involves chemical
dehydration  and charring of a carbonaceous raw materi-
al, and  usually is carried out at temperatures between
200and650°C.
   Porosity  is developed by the action of dehydrating
chemicals—normally   phosphoric acid, zinc chloride
and/or sulfuric acid-on the cellulose  structure of the
starting material, or  by  the action  of oxidizing gases
generated  in the process.  In  the  high  temperature
oxidation  of a  previously charred  carbonaceous  sub-
stance, a porous structure is developed in the low surface
area carbonaceous starting material by  controlled oxida-
tion at temperatures between 800 and 950°C with steam,
flue gas, or some other oxidizing  gas mixture. Bone
charcoal is manufactured by a different  process, in
which collagen and other carbon containing components
of  bone are  carbonized  at  high temperatures in the
absence  of oxidizing gases  to form carbon  deposits
within the hydroxyapatite structure of bone.
   The properties of an activated carbon depend on the
nature of the raw  material used, the conditions under
which carbonization is accomplished,  the activation
process   and  conditions,  and  post  treatment  of the
product.
   Surface  areas  usually range between 450 and  1500
m^/g. Bone charcoal is  an  exception,  having, in the
freshly prepared form, an area of about  100 m^/g char.
Bone char,  however, contains only 5 to  12% by weight
of carbon, which accounts for 50%  of its surface. The
carbon present is truly in  an activated state, having an
area of between 400 and 1000 m^/g carbon, depending
on the composition of the char.
   The surface areas of some typical  carbons are shown
in Table  1.7

                   TABLE 1.
SURFACE AREAS OF TYPICAL ACTIVATED CARBONS
Name
Origin
                                      Area,
Actibon S
Columbia G
Columbia AC
Darco S51
Darco G60
Darco KB
Filtrasorb 100 & 200
Filtrasorb 300
Filtrasorb 400
Norit
Nuchar Aqua
Nuchar WV-W
Nuchar WV-G
Witco718
Wood
Coconut shell
Coconut shell
Lignite
Lignite
Wood
Coal
Coal
Coal
Wood
Pupl mill residue
Coal
Coal
Petroleum residue
850-
1100-
1200-
500-
750-
950-
850-
950-
1050-
600-
550-
800-
1000-
1100-
900
1150
1400
550
800
1000
900
1050
1200
800
650
900
1100
1200
   Surface area is normally determined by measuring the
volume of nitrogen  gas adsorbed  at  liquid nitrogen
temperature  (-195°C)  at  various pressures.  From this
data  one  can calculate, using the  BET equation,  the
monolayer coverage and the surface  area.1  The actual
area  available for adsorption of a specific compound
from water  can be  considerably less  than the total
surface area determined by nitrogen adsorption.
   For gas adsorbing carbons, for example, most of the
surface  area  is in micropores, and these carbons have
little capacity for molecules too large to enter a pore less
than about 200 A in diameter. As  another example,
bone char has a surface area of about 65 m^/g. Typical
commercial granular activated carbons may have areas in
excess of  100 m^/g; these, however, have only between
5 and 10 times the capacity of bone char in a use such as
sugar decolorization. Based on total surface area alone
they should be over 15 times as active, but bone char has
a much lower  proportion of its surface in  micropores
                                                     37

-------
and thus more readily available for sorption of the large
color bodies. The conclusion that must be reached then
is that total surface area  is not by itself a satisfactory
measure  of available surface for  liquid phase applic-
ations. Rather, it is the  distribution of surface area as a
function of  pore  size  within  the  sorbent  which  is
important.
   Pore volume  distribution  can be determined  by a
combination  of mercury  porosimetry  and  gas  adsorp-
tion-desorption measurements. Gas carbons are charac-
terized  by a  large  percentage  of  pore  volume in
micropores, the  almost  total absence of pore volume in
transitional pores, and a secondary  maximum in macro-
pores. Conversely, liquid phase carbons have a pronounc-
ed  percentage  of  pore  volume  in  transitional pores
together with capacity  in both micro and macropores.
Thus, just  as with total  surface area, total pore volume is
not acceptable by itself as a measure of capacity. Total
pore volumes of gas and liquid phase carbons are similar,
but it is the pore volume in large pores which determines
in large measure the capacity of liquid phase carbons.
Together, total surface  area and total pore volume  thus
given some  measure of the  potential capacity  of a
carbon, which  depends on the distribution of area or
volume with pore size, and the distribution of molecular
sizes to be  adsorbed.
   The chemical properties of the surface of the activa-
ted carbon are also important in determining activity;
that is, capacity  for a  specific adsorbate. The chemical
properties of the surface depend on the starting material,
the activation process,  and the conditions employed in
activation.
   Activated  carbon can  be  considered to consist of
essentially  two  types of  surfaces, excluding contribu-
tions from inorganic impurities.  The  first are planar,
non-polar  surfaces, which  comprise the  bulk of the
surface  for most carbons. Adsorption on  this surface
would be largely  of the van der Waals type. The second
type of surface is comprised of the heterogeneous edges
of the carbon  planes,  which made up  the crystallites,
whereon carbon-oxygen  functional groups formed by
oxidation  in  the  manufacturing process are located.
These groups, which include phenolic  hydroxyl, alco-
holic  hydroxyl,  carboxyl,   n-lactone,  f-lactone  and
chromene  groups,  enable activated carbon surfaces to
undergo halogenation, hydrogenation, oxidation, and to
act as a catalyst in many reactions.
   The surface properties of different carbons can  have
profound effects on both rate and capacity for adsorp-
tion. The surface chemistry of active carbon has been a
subject of  much interest for some time, yet surprisingly
little is known about the nature of the surface functional
groups of this material. Recent work in our laboratories
has provided an  examination of the character of func-
tional groups formed on  active.carbon under different
conditions of activation, using the technique of multiple
internal reflectance spectroscopy (MIRS) as a means for
characterizing surface functional groups.1
   While  the  activity  of a sorbent  is related  to its
distribution of surface area and the chemistry of that
surface, it must be recognized that activity or capacity is
only one  parameter which  must be taken  into account
when selecting a carbon for a particular process. Other
properties to  be  considered include hardness and head-
loss characteristics for granular carbons, filterability and
bulk density for  powdered carbons, water solubility of
impurities, and pH.
   As  already noted  it is not  possible to determine
activity or capacity from basic carbon  properties such as
surface area, not  to relate activity for a water or effluent
application  to capacity for a reference sorbate, such as
iodine or methylene  blue. Activity or capacity must be
determined directly  on  the system  of interest.  For
granular carbons, hardness is probably second in impor-
tance to capacity among properties to be considered in
carbon selection. Hardness determines, in large measure,
the loss on  each adsorption-regeneration  cycle. Losses
result  from attrition on handling and burn-off during
reactivation. For coalbased carbons, losses of about 5%
per cycle  can be  expected; losses for softer carbons can
be as high as 15% or more.
   Head-loss or pressure drop in  downflow columns and
bed expansion in upflow columns of granular carbon are
determined in part by particle size and size distribution;
these properties are therefore factors influencing design
installation and capital costs. In general, the smallest size
of particle that conditions of efficient operation permit
should be used, for this increases the adsorption rate and
thus  reduces  the size  of the  plant required.  For
powdered carbon, which usually must be removed  from
the treated water by filtration, filterability is affected by
particle shape, size and size distribution.
   Bulk density is  also important in the selection of a
powdered  carbon,  for it determines, to a  large extent,
the length of the filtration cycle. Filterability  is impor-
tant, for poor filtration results in the use of more carbon
and filter aid, and the need to provide a larger plant.
   All carbons contain some soluble impurities depend-
ing on the nature of  the starting material, the activation
process, and final  treatment.  The amounts  and the
nature of the compounds which  can be tolerated will be
governed  by  the purity requirements  of the treated
water or effluent.
   The "pH"  of a carbon is actually the pH measured on
a  water  extract  from  the carbon.  It is  a  function
primarily of the  nature of the activation process; steam
activation  usually yields alkaline carbons,  while activa-
tion with phosphoric acid, for example, gives carbon pH
values below  5. The  pH of carbon can be modified by
washing. Steam activated carbons can  be acid washed to
give  products with pH values  between 5  and 7, while
phosphoric acid carbons can be "neutralized" by caustic
wash.  The adsorption of many solutes can be related to
solubility, which  in turn is affected by  pH. The optimum
                                                       38

-------
pH of the carbon, as well as of the solution, can be
determined only by experiment with the specific waste
water to be treated.

Solute Properties

   In general, an inverse relationship between the extent
of adsorption of a solute and its water solubility can be
anticipated. The water solubility of organic compounds
within  a  particular  chemical class  decreases  with
increasing chain length, because the compound becomes
more hydrocarbon-like as the number of carbon atoms
becomes  greater.  Thus,  adsorption   from  aqueous
solution increases as an homologous series is ascended,
largely  because  the expulsion  of  increasingly  large
hydrophobic molecules from water permits an increasing
number of water-water bonds to reform.
   Molecular size is of significance if the adsorption rate
is controlled by intraparticle transport, in which case the
reaction generally proceeds more rapidly the smaller the
adsorbate molecule. It  must be emphasized, however,
that the rate depends on class or series of molecules.
Large  molecules of one chemical  class  may  sorb more
rapidly than  smaller ones of another if higher energies
(driving forces) are involved.1
   Many organic compounds exist, or have the potential
of  existing,  as  ionic species.  Fatty  acids, phenolic
species, amines, and many pesticides are a few materials
having  the   property  of  ionizing  under appropriate
conditions of pH. Activated carbon commonly carries a
net  negative  surface  charge; further, many  of  the
physical and  chemical  properties of certain compounds
undergo  changes  upon ionization.  Most observations
point to the  generalization that as long as compounds
are structurally simple, sorption is  at  a minimum for
charged species  and  at a maximum  for neutral species.
As  compounds  become  more complex, the  effect of
ionization decreases. Studies  of amphoteric compounds
indicate an adsorption maximum at the isoelectric point,
consistent with other observations that adsorption is at a
maximum for  neutral species. A  polar solute will be
strongly  sorbed  from  a non-polar solvent by a polar
sorbent, but  will prefer a polar solvent  to a non-polar
sorbent. Polarity of organic compounds is a function of
charge separation within  the molecule.  Almost  any
asymmetric  compound will be more  or less  polar, but
several types  of functional groups tend to produce fairly
high polarities in compounds. Examples  of  these are
hydroxyl. carboxyl, nitro, nitrile, carbonyl, sulfonate,
and amine. Thus ethanol, C2H50H, is polar, having an
incremental  negative charge  on  the hydroxyl and  a
corresponding  positive  charge  on  the  ethyl  group.
Because  solvation by  water involves formation of  a
hydrogen  bond  from one  of the  positively charged
hydrogens of the water to a group bearing more or less
of a negative charge  along with some bonding in the
reverse direction to the water oxygen, water solubility is
expected  to  increase   with  increasing  polarity.  It
therefore  follows that adsorption decreases as polarity
increases,  even though active carbon is a polar sorbent.
   Because hydrogen and  hydroxide  ions are sorbed
quite strongly, the adsorption of other ions is influenced
by  the  pH of the  solution. Further,  to the extent to
which ionization of an acidic or basic compound affects
its adsorption, pH affects adsorption in that it governs
the  degree  of ionization.  In  general,  adsorption  of
typical organic pollutants from water  is increased with
decreasing pH.
   Adsorption reactions are normally exothermic; thus
the  extent   of  adsorption  generally  increases  with
decreasing temperature.  The changes  in enthalpy for
adsorption are  usually  of  the  order  of  those for
condensation  or  crystallization  reactions, thus  small
variations   in  temperature  tend  not  to  alter  the
adsorption process in water  and effluent treatment to a
significant extent.
   The  organic  components of  a waste  mixture may
mutually  enhance  adsorption,  may  act   relatively
independently, or  may interfere  with  one  another.
Mutual  inhibition  can  be  expected if the adsorption
affinities of the solutes do not differ by several orders of
magnitude and there is no specific interaction  between
solutes  enhancing  adsorption.   Similarly,  because the
adsorption of one  substance will tend  to reduce the
number of open sites and, hence, the "concentration" of
adsorbent available, mutually depressing effects on rates
of adsorption may be predicted.
   It  should be apparent from  the foregoing discussion
of the effects of solute  character on adsorption that an
analytical  characterization  of the impurities present is
helpful to a thoughtful prediction of the effectiveness of
activated carbon in wastewater purification.

ADSORBER SYSTEMS

   The  type  of reactor system in  which to contact
carbon  most  effectively  with  the  wastewater  to  be
treated  is  of particular  significance for  large-scale
treatment operations.  Rates of adsorption on  granular
carbon  have  been  found  to   depend, in  significant
measure,  upon the  particle  size of the carbon.1 It is
desirable  to employ  carbon of as small a diameter as
conditions of efficient  operation permit,  so that high
rates  of sorption obtain. The term "efficient operation"
is a key here,  for the size of particle chosen will dictate
to some extent  the type of reactor system  in  which
contact of  the  carbon  with  the  wastewater will  be
accomplished. For example, powdered carbon  must be
used in either a batch or stirred-tank flow  reactor; head
loss   through  a  bed  or  column reactor would  be
prohibitive in most  cases. The  type of reactor, on the
other hand, will  dictate to some extent the efficiency of
contact,  and  therefore  the efficiency of  the  sorption
reaction.
                                                       39

-------
   In batch-type contact processes, a quantity of carbon
is  mixed continuously with a specific volume of waste
until the contaminants have been decreased to a desired
level. The carbon  is then removed and either discarded
or regenerated for use with another volume of solution.
If powdered carbon is  used in  this type  of system,
separation  of the spent sorbent  from the  water may
present difficulties. Conversely, the use of large particles,
which may  be  removed  more readily  when  exhausted,
requires longer periods of contact, necessitating larger
reactors.
   Continuous-flow  operations have an advantage over
batch-type  operations   because   rates  of  adsorption
depend  upon the concentration of solute in the solution
being treated.  Further,  plug-flow   (PF)  or  column,
reactors have this same type of  advantage over  com-
pletely-mixed-flow (CMF) reactors.1  For column opera-
tion,  the carbon is  continuously in contact with  fresh
solution. Consequently,  the  concentration  in the solu-
tion in contact with a given layer of carbon in a column
changes very slowly. For batch treatment,  the concentra-
tion of solute  in  contact with a specific  quantity  of
carbon  decreases  much  more rapidly as sorption pro-
ceeds, thereby decreasing the effectiveness of the carbon
for removing the solute. These considerations regarding
reactor  efficiencies, coupled with the difficulty associ-
ated  with  regeneration  of  powdered carbon,  make
granular carbon  the  choice  for  most municipal and
industrial wastewater treatment operations.
   Common adsorber systems are illustrated in Figure 1.
For any system, a particular combination of flow rate
and  bed  depth  is  used  to  give an  effective design
"contact time," the time required to reduce the organic
contaminants  from  the influent  level to  the  desired
effluent  level.  Flow rates  under  10 gpm/ft2  (407
                               l/min/m^) are usually employed  to minimize pumping
                               costs associated with high head loss.
                                  Municipal  wastewater  treatment   experience  has
                               indicated good treatment at contact times between 30
                               and 60 minutes. Significantly longer contact times are
                               normally required  for industrial waste streams, consis-
                               tent  with  generally  higher  organic  concentrations.
                               Adsorption theory and practice indicate that treatment
                               efficiency  and  economics  are   favored  by  higher
                               concentration. Thus,  at some  industrial installations,
                               concentrated  waste streams are treated individually at
                               their respective sources  to optimize  overall treatment
                               system design and economics.
                                  To  provide sufficient removal  of the organic loads
                               normally associated with wastewater, and to utilize the
                               carbon most effectively, an approach to countercurrent
                               contact is commonly required. This can be achieved with
                               moving bed adsorbers, or approximated with a number
                               of fixed  bed  adsorbers in series. In the latter case the
                               lead contactor  in  a series of  adsorption  columns is
                               removed from service when the  carbon it  contains is
                               exhausted  (or nearly so) and, after being refilled with
                               fresh carbon, is  placed  at  the end of the series.  Each
                               contactor is thus advanced one position in the series by
                               piping and valving arrangements which permit shifting of
                               inflow and outflow points of the  series accordingly. As
                               the  number  of stages  increases, the piping  and valving
                               arrangement   becomes  more  complex  and  costly. A
                               compromise   between   the  advantage  of  employing
                               multiple stages to more effectively utilize the carbon and
                               the cost  of each additional stage must be achieved.
                                  Upflow, expanded operation of fixed beds of granular
                               carbon permits the use  of small particle sizes for faster
                               adsorption rates,  without  the associated problems of
                               excessive  headloss,   air-binding,  and  fouling  with
         MOVING 3ED
                  -out
DOWN FLOW IN SERIES
  • Counter-current carbon UM
  • Prior tutpsnded solids removi!
  • Smaller volu
• Coimter-currjntctrbonuM
• Miilmumlin«ir velocity
• Ljrga voluma t y»t«m>
                            DOWN FLOW IN PARALLEL
                                                       1-,   ~1
                                                        UPFLOW-EXPANOED IN SERIES
• Filtration & adsorption
• Miximum lineir vtloo
• Lirj« voluma lyftemt
• CounUr-current ctrtoon use
• Minimum ha^d lost
• Minimum prtlreiimtnt
                        Figure  1.  Common Types of Adsorber Systems
                                                       40

-------
particulate matter  common to  packed-bed  operation
with fine  media. In expanded-bed operation, the water
flows  upward   through  a  column  of  relatively  fine
granular   carbon.  The  advantages   of  expanded-bed
adsorbers  over  packed-bed adsorbers have been demon-
strated and discussed.8
   For fixed-bed (either  packed or expanded) sorption
operations,  the wastewater  to  be  treated  is passed
through a stationary bed. Non-steady-state  conditions
prevail in  that the carbon continues to remove increasing
amounts   of  impurities from solution  over the entire
period of useful operation.
   Figure  2  is  a  plot of the sorption  pattern which
normally  obtains for a fixed-bed non-steady-state sorber.
The  impurity is sorbed most rapidly  and effectively by
the  first  few layers of fresh sorbent during the initial
stages of operation. These first layers are in contact with
the solution  at its  highest concentration level, C0. The
small amounts  of solute which  escape adsorption in the
first  few  layers are  then  removed  from  solution  in
subsequent strata, and essentially no solute escapes from
the  sorber  initially.  The  primary  sorption zone  is
concentrated near the influent end of  the column, the
first  layers of carbon become practically  saturated with
solute  and less effective  for  further sorption. Thus, the
primary sorption zone moves  through  the  column  to
regions of fresher sorbent. The wave-like movement  of
this  zone, accompanied  by a movement  of  the  C0
concentration front, occurs at  a rate  much slower than
the  linear velocity  of the  water  or effluent. As the
primary sorption zone moves through the bed, more and
more solute  tends to  escape in the column effluent,  as
indicated  in the  sequence  of  schematic drawings  in
Figure 2.  The plot of C/CO vs time (for  a constant flow
rate), or volume treated, depicts the increase in the ratio
of effluent to influent concentrations as the zone moves
through  the  column.  The  breakpoint on  this curve
represents   that  point  in  operation  where—for  all
practical purposes—the column is in equilibrium with the
influent  water,  and  beyond  which  little additional
removal of solute occurs. At this point, it is desirable to
reactivate or replace the carbon.
   The method chosen for  operation of fixed-bed sorber
is dependent on the shape  of the curve given by plotting
C/CO vs time or volume. As noted previously, this curve
is referred to as a breakthrough curve. For most sorption
operations   in  water  and  effluent  treatment,  break-
through curves exhibit characteristic non-symmetric "S"
shapes,  but with  varying degrees  of steepness  and
positions of break-point. Factors which affect the actual
shape of the curve include the shape of the adsorption
isotherm, solute concentration, pH, rate-limiting mecha-
nism  for adsorption  and  nature  of  the  equilibrium
conditions,  particle size, depth of the  column or bed,
and the velocity  of flow.1  As a general rule,  the time
to break-point is  decreased by: 1) increased particle size
of the sorbent; 2) increased concentration  of  solute in
the influent; 3) increased pH of the water; 4) increased
flow rate; and, 5) decreased bed depth. If the total bed
depth is smaller than  the length of the primary sorption
zone  required for effective  removal  of solute  from
solution, then the concentration of solute in the effluent
will  rise sharply from  the  time  the  effluent is first
discharged  from  the  adsorber. Thus, for each type of
sorption  operation there exists a critical  minimum bed
depth.
   Quantitive  prediction of the performance of fixed-
bed sorbers  involves prediction of the shape and position
                                          Time, or Volume of Wa!er Trsats
                           Figure 2.  Adsorntjo-i Pattern in a Fixed-Bed Adsorbe
                                                       41

-------
of the breakthrough curve, representing the movement
of the sorption front through an adsorber. Much of the
time and expense in planning and designing adsorption
facilities  is involved in predicting  or forecasting the
operational dynamics of the adsorption  process  for a
given  waste water stream; this generally requires exten-
sive experimental pilot study. Both the time and expense
for such prediction can be  minimized  by a  general
modeling scheme which is  capable of describing the
dynamics  of adsorption processes  given certain  basic
information about  the  system of interest. At a very
minimum,  a  general modeling scheme  aids design of
programs  to  be carried out at the  pilot level and
evaluation  of the effects of process and operational
variables, thereby easing the  transition from pilot to full
scale, conserving time  and money, and ensuring  more
optimum full scale design and operation.
   Although  a  detailed  discussion of various types of
modeling  procedures that  have  been  developed for
adsorber design is beyond the scope of this paper, it will
be  noted  that  Weber  and  Crittenden have  recently
developed a general  modeling scheme termed MADAM I;
Michigan Adsorption Design  and Applications Model  -
1.2 Based on  numeric solution techniques, MADAM I is
not restricted to simplified rate and equilibrium expres-
sions   to  facilitate   analytic  solution.  Rather  it can
accomodate the  dynamic aspects of fluid dispersion,
solids  mixing,  multisolute  interactions, and biological
growth on  activated carbon surfaces, aspects which must
be  excluded  because of mathematic  complexity  from
models which are based on analytic solution techniques.

MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT

   A   number   of   physicochemical  separation   and
conversion  processes have been studied over the past two
decades  for  potential  applications  to  wastewater
treatment.  Among these have been adsorption, coagula-
tion,   chemical   oxidation,  solvent  extraction,  ion
exchange, distillation,  freezing, reverse  osmosis, ultra-
filtration, electrodialysis,  electrochemical degradation,
flotation,  and   foam  separation/9"11^ The   process
combination   of   coagulation  and  precipitation  for
removal of insoluble impurities followed by sorption on
activated  carbon   for  removal   of  soluble   organic
impurities has emerged as the treatment sequence of
greatest  promise  in terms  of both  technologic  and
economic feasibility.
   Development of physicochemical processes for higher
levels  of treatment  centered  initially  on  "tertiary"
systems designed to follow "primary" sedimentation and
"secondary"   biological   treatment/10-1D There  are
however,  several  fundamental shortcomings   to  this
approach. First, the implementation of tertiary systems
depends  upon  prior implementation  of  primary  and
secondary systems.  Second, the   addition of  tertiary
processes to  primary  and secondary processes incurs
capital and operating expenses of such magnitude as to
discourage this development in many instances. Third,
the effective operation  of a tertiary process is dependent
to  a  large  extent  on  the consistent  and  efficient
operation of a biological  secondary process,  which  is
normally subject  to problems arising from transients in
waste  composition and flow (often requiring  at least
partial diversion) and  from  the occasional presence of
toxic materials.
   The  concept  of applying coagulation-sorption  pro-
cesses  directly to raw  wastes rather than to secondary
effluents therefore has  derived partially from considera-
tions regarding  the  effectiveness  and  reliability  of
treatment and partially from the  relative economics of
"direct"  versus "tertiary" treatment systems.12 Direct
physicochemical treatment employing coagulation and
adsorption subsequently has been demonstrated to be an
attractive  technical   and  economic   alternative  to
biological treatment.1^"18
                                                    TABLE 1.
                OPERATING RESULTS OF PILOT PHYSICOCHEMICAL TREATMENT PLANTS

                Plant                                       Organic           Effluent
                                                           Removal, %     Concentration

                Ewing-Lawrence (New Jersey)                  95-98        TOCW    @ 3-5
                Blue Plains (Washington, D.C.)                   95-98        TOC       =  6
                Lebanon (Ohio)
                   a. powdered carbonq                        95           TOC       =  11
                   b. granular carbon                           97           TOC       =  6
                New Rochelle (New York)                      95           COD(ii)   =  8
                Rocky River (Ohio)                            93           BOD(ui)   =  8
                Salt Lake City (Utah)
                   powdered carbon                           91           BOD       =  13
                Owosso (Michigan)                             94           BOD       =  8
                   (i) TOC - total organic carbon
                  (ii) COD — chemical oxygen demand
                  (iii) BOD — biochemical oxygen demand
                                                      42

-------
   With  pretreatment  of  raw  waste  by  chemical
clarification—which results in significant removal of both
total  and   soluble  organic matter,  phosphates  and
suspended solids—activated carbon treatment commonly
produces a clear effluent of low organic content, suitable
to meet requirements for pollution control and for many
reuse applications.
   To give some illustration  of  this, Table 1 summarizes
overall  treatment  results  obtained at several different
pilot  installations  of  physicochemical treatment  by
coagulations and adsorption. More than twenty munici-
palities  in  the United  States  are  currently designing,
constructing or operating physicochemical facilities for
wastewater  treatment.  The  number  of industrial
treatment facilities using physicochemical processes is an
order   of magnitude  larger;   these  numbers  can  be
expected to increase sharply  within the next decade.
   The most common type of adsorber system is one in
which  the   effluent is  passed  through  fixed  beds of
granular carbon. In such systems hydraulic application
rates  generally range  from 2  gpm/ft^  to 8  gpm/ft^
(81-326  1/min/m^).  In  this  flow  range  essentially
equivalent sorption efficiency is obtained for equivalent
contact  times. At flow  rates below 2  gpm/ft   (81
l/min/m^) sorption efficiency is  reduced, while at flow
rates  above  8  gpm/ft^  (326   l/min/m^)  excessive
pressure drop  takes place in packed beds. Contact times
employed are  in the range of 30  minutes to 60 minutes
on an  empty  bed basis. In general, increases in contact
time up to  30 minutes yield proportionate increases in
organic removal. Beyond 30 minutes the rate of increase
falls off with increases in contact time, and at about 60
minutes  the effects of additional contact  time become
negligible. Carbon beds operated  at the lower end of the
flow  range  are  generally   designed  for  gravity flow.
Systems designed for higher  flow rates must employ
pressure vessels if packed beds are used. A pressure vessel
is more expensive to construct than a gravity flow vessel,
but commonly  requires less  land area,  and  provides
greater ability  to handle fluctuations in flow.
   Provision  must be  made  to  regularly backwash
packed-bed  carbon  systems   because  they  collect
suspended solids  and  tend to develop attached biologic
growths in this application. Backwashing alone generally
relieves clogging due  to suspended solids,  but does not
completely  remove attached  biologic  growth.  It  is
advisable to include a surface wash and air scour to be
assured of removal of gelatinous biologic growth.
   This attached  growth  can  lead to development of
anaerobic conditions  in  packed  beds. Aeration of  the
feed  is  partially  effective in  preventing anaerobic
conditions, but this also accelerates biologic growth to
the  extent   that  excessive   backwash   is  required;
air-binding can also result. Effective control of biological
growth can be accomplished in most instances by regular
chlorination of the influent  to  the adsorbers, and/or by
chlorination or caustic addition during regular backwash
operations.
   Packed beds of granular carbon are well suited for
treatment of effluents containing little or no suspended
solids, and under such circumstances normally  operate
effectively  for extended periods without  clogging or
excessive pressure loss.  However, the suspended solids
invariably  present  in  many   wastewaters,  and   the
potential  for biologic  growth on  the  surfaces of the
carbon can present problems for the use of packed beds.
Because  solids and  biologic  activity  usually cause
progressive clogging and high  head loss in  packed beds,
increased  interest  has  developed in the  potential of
expanded-bed  adsorbers, which  have certain  inherent
operating advantages  over packed-bed adsorbers  for
treating  solutions   containing  suspended  solids.  By
passing wastewater upward through a bed of carbon at
velocities  sufficient to  expand  the  bed,  problems of
fouling,  plugging   and  increasing   pressure drop   are
minimized. Effective operation over longer periods of
time  results, as has been demonstrated in comparative
laboratory  studies  and  in field  investigations  in both
"tertiary"    and   direct   physicochemical   applic-
ations.8'15'16 Another advantage of the expanded  bed,
as noted earlier, is  the relatively small dependence of
pressure drop on particle size. It is possible to use carbon
of smaller  particle  size in an  expanded  bed  than is
practical  in  a  packed  bed, thus taking advantage of
somewhat higher  adsorption  rates which obtain  for
smaller particles.
   Perhaps  the  most  significant  potential   benefit
provided  by  expanded-bed  adsorption  systems   for
effluent  treatment is the apparent  extension  of the
operational  capacity of activated carbon  observed by
Weber et al15'16 who  found that apparent sorption
capacities in excess of  100 weight-percent  as  organic
matter and  150  weight-percent  as chemical  oxygen
demand (COD) could  be obtained in expanded-beds of
activated carbon in which biologic growth has allowed to
fully  develop.16  Because expanded beds  require little
maintenance, extended periods of undisturbed operation
facilitate  the  development and continuous  growth of
bacteria on  the carbon surfaces. This biologic growth
functions  both to biosorb and  degrade  some  organic
compounds that would not ordinarily adsorb well on the
carbon, and  to degrade some  of the organic matter
which does adsorb on the carbon, functioning to provide
in-situ partial regeneration by renewing a portion of the
carbon surface  for  continued  sorption. Prevention of
septic  conditions  and  hydrogen sulfide generation in
biologically  active  adsorbers  can be accomplished by
addition of small amounts of oxygen or nitrate to the
feed to the adsorbers.
   Table  2  gives  carbon capacities obtained  in  field
operations  at several physicochemical pilot plants. In
that  the  wastes, effluent  criteria,  number of contact
states, etc. varied from plant to plant, it is not surprising
that some spread in the results is observed. For general
                                                       43

-------
planning purposes a COD capacity of 50 weight-percent
is reasonable if no biologic extension of carbon capacity
is taken into account. This is approximately equivalent
to a requirement of 500 pounds of activated carbon per
million  gallons  (60 grams per  cubic meter) of sewage
treated. However, the results obtained  by Weber et al,
16   with biologically-extended   adsorption  systems
suggest   that  it may  be possible  to  achieve higher
effective capacities, reducing the carbon exhaustion rate
to less than 200-250 pounds per million gallons (24-30
grams per cubic  meter).
                       TABLE 2.
     CARBON CAPACITIES OBTAINED IN PHYSICO-
                 CHEMICAL PILOT PLANTS
Plant
Blue Plains (Washington)
Ewing—Lawrence (New Jersey)*
New Rochelle (New York)
Lebanon (Ohio)
Owosso (Michigan)
Salt Lake City (Utah)
Capacities,
   TOC

   15
   50
 20-24
   22
weight-percent
   COD

     41
    150
     60
     50
     65
     36
16
   * Biologically-extended expanded-bed operation
   Even  for  the  highest capacities observed, the initial
cost of  carbon are such as  to make regeneration and
reuse of this material highly desirable. Technically and
economically feasible regeneration of granular activated
carbon can be  accomplished by controlled heating in a
multiple-hearth or rotary-kiln furnace in the presence of
steam. During  each regeneration cycle some  carbon is
lost by burning and attrition, and some by alteration of
surface properties.  The overall loss, expressed as percent
by weight of virgin carbon required to restore the total
original  capacity  of the  batch,  ranges  from 5 to  10
percent.   For  planning  purposes,   carbon  make-up
requirements in municipal treatment can be considered
to range from 25  to 50  Ibs. per million gallons  (3-6
grams per cubic meter) of wastewater treated, again not
taking account of in-situ biological regeneration.
   At  present, regeneration  systems  for  powdered
carbon  are  being  developed and  tested. A successful
process  for  regeneration of the  powdered form  would
represent  a significant  step toward making treatment
system utilizing this lower cost material a technical and
economic reality.  The  key  factor will  be maintaining
carbon   loss   at   a  sufficiently  low  level   during
regeneration.
   A suggested flow sheet for physicochemical treatment
of waste waters is  given in  Figure 3. In this scheme,
coagulant is added to the effluent, and flocculation takes
place  in a  chamber which provides moderate agitation
for  an  average   detention  time  of  15  minutes.
Clarification takes place  in a sedimentation basin with an
average  detention time of two hours. The particular flow
sheet  presented here is a single-stage coagulation system.
   The clarified effluent is then passed through activated
carbon  adsorption  units  for   removal  of  dissolved
organics.  The  preferred  mode of  operation  is  an
expanded bed, which permits the use of simple open-top
concrete contacting  basins  and relatively trouble-free
operation. The use of open tanks with overflow weirs at
the surface  of the contacting basin provides a means for
additional aeration of the  wastewater during treatment,
thus  helping  to   control  anaerobic   conditions  in
subsequent  reactors.  Two-stage  contacting  of  the
activated carbon is outlined in  the treatment sequence
given in Figure 3. However, a larger number of stages can
be  utilized  if  desired  for a particular application.  A
typical  plant layout for a  design capacity of 10 million
gallons (37,850 cubic meters) per day might be based on
five parallel adsorption  units of two stages each. When
                  HAW SEW-'-SE
                                                                        2-STAGE
                                                                        CARBON CONTACTORS
                                                                        EXPANDED BEOS
                                                                I  CARBON REGENERATION
                                                                I                  '
                                                                Ln
                                                                DRAIN
                                                                TANK
                                         i   I
                                         MULTl-   STORAGE
                                         HEARTH  TANK
                                         FURNACE
                                Figure 3.  Schematic Diagram of A Typical.
                                         Physicochemical Treatment System
                                                       44

-------
the granular carbon in the first stage of one unit is spent,
that unit can be taken off stream while the spent carbon
is removed and regenerated in a furnace provided for this
purpose. During the time  this unit is off-stream for
regeneration, the other four units can run at 25% higher
feed rate each. Upon completion of the regeneration, the
carbon is returned to the adsorber, which then becomes
the second stage of that unit; the former second stage
with  partially spent  carbon becoming the first stage.
Feed is  then evenly divided  to  the five units until
another carbon bed is spent.
   The  water   resulting  from the  clarification  and
activated  carbon treatment  of municipal wastewaters
will  enhance the quality of most  surface waters, and
with disinfection is suitable for many reuse applications.
A  final filtration may be  desirable  to insure a crystal
clear  effluent.  This post-filtration  would remove any
suspended  matter  passing  through,  or biologically
generated in, the carbon columns.

INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT

   Industrial wastewater treatment is perhaps one of the
most effective and widespread environmental application
areas for adsorption processes.  Experience with a broad
range of different types of industrial effluents indicates
that treatment by  activated carbon is technically and
economically suitable for many such applications.
   In addition to its use as a sole treatment process, with
appropriate  pretreatment  as  required, activated carbon
treatment has been applied  in some  instances to the
effluents from biological  treatment processes, and in
other instances to the influents to biological treatment
processes. In  the  former case adsorption  usually  is
intended for removal of biologically  resistant chemicals,
such as nitrated  aromatics in some chemicals industries.
In the latter case, the purpose of adsorption is to remove
substances,  such   as  chlorophenol  in   the  pesticide
industries, which may be toxic or otherwise  capable of
inhibiting biological treatment processes.

Pretreatment Requirements

   Granular carbon  rather than  powdered carbon is most
commonly utilized  for industrial waste treatment; this
normally  involves  the  use  of either  fixed-bed  or
moving-bed contact systems.  Pretreatment in these cases
is primarily for removal of excess suspended solids, oils,
and  greases; materials  which,  although  they can  be
removed effectively by  the adsorption bed,  will likely
cause problems of head loss, fouling,  and plugging of the
adsorber.
   Suspended  solids  in  amounts exceeding approxi-
mately 50 mg/1  should be  removed prior to adsorption.
Oils and greases  in concentrations above about 10 mg/1
should not be applied directly to adsorption beds. In
addition  to causing head loss problems, these materials,
particularly  oils  and  greases,  can  coat the  carbon
particles  and  reduce  adsorption  effectiveness dramati-
cally.
   For  concentrations  of suspended  solids, oils, and
greases  below the values given above, carbon beds are
frequently used  for the  dual role of  filtration and
adsorption.  Carbon  bed  engineering incorporates well
established  filtration  experience  regarding backwash
requirements, surface wash or air scour features, and
appropriate   flow  rates  conducive  to  filtration. In
applying  established filtration  experience  to  carbon
beds, which are normally deeper  than ordinary filters, it
has  been demonstrated  that  the top few feet of  the
carbon  bed   function  in the  same  manner  as  the
equivalent depth of a conventional single media  filter.
Backwash  bed  expansion  should  be based  on this
effective filtration depth rather than the total adsorption
bed depth.
   Chemical clarification, air  flotation  and filtration are
common  pretreatment  processes.  It  is  not unusual,
however, to find  that pretreatment is not required  when
adsorption is applied at the  point of  origin  of  the
contaminant  of concern. Treatment of combined  waste
streams,   on  the   other  hand,  invariably  requires
pretreatment for  removal of suspended solids, oil, and
grease.
   Adjustment of pH is sometimes employed  to enhance
adsorption efficiency. Dissolved organic compounds are
normally adsorbed best  at the pH of minimum polarity.
For  example, weak acids, such  as phenol,  are better
adsorbed  at   lower  pH values,  while amines can be
expected to adsorb best at higher  pH values. Potential
advantages of pH adjustment can be quickly determined
by laboratory  tests.
   Flow  equalization is desirable  for many industrial
effluent treatment processes. While adsorber systems can
be designed to meet fluctuating influent hydraulic  loads
and organic concentrations, the treatment system can be
more economically designed and operated when  these
fluctuations are minimized.

Treatability Evaluation

   Adsorption isotherm  tests are  standard first-step
procedures for determining the feasibility of  adsorption
for a specific application. The isotherm indicates the
degree of treatment  that might be  achieved and the
approximate  amount of carbon  required to reach a
treatment objective. It also indicates the  dependence of
the amount of adsorption on contaminant  concentra-
tion.1
   The  Calgon Corporation  has  recently tested  222
samples of different industrial effluents, representing 68
different  mam facturing  operations,  to  evaluate the
removal  of  organic  contaminants by  activated  car-
bon.19
   In the  work  reported by Calgon,  samples  were
                                                       45

-------
membrane  filtered  prior  to  the  adsorption  tests to
remove  suspended material  which otherwise could be
incorrectly  associated with adsorption treatment. This is
generally a good  experimental procedure, and  the type
and concentration of suspended material removed in this
step gives a preliminary indication of the  desirability of
pretreatment.
   The  adsorption  isotherm  results are  summarized
below, grouped according to SIC classification (Standard
Industrial Classification, U.S. Dept. of Commerce) of the
wastewater treated.  This grouping allows  comparison of
adsorption  performance on like  organic  contaminants
and  provides  a  reference  list for  indication of the
feasibility of adsorption as a treatment for each class of
effluent.
   The  list is a  useful  reference  when considering
treatment alternatives available for a specific industrial
effluent  problem,   with   respect  to  a  preliminary
indication of the feasibility of adsorption treatment. The
data presented  can  be further catagorized  according
to organic concentration.   This categorization  is given
in Table 4.
   Because of the generally high levels of TOC evidenced
in most untreated industrial effluents, it is likely that a
combination of  treatment processes will be required to
meet rigorous  TOC reduction objectives at lowest cost.
The selectivity of adsorption on activated  carbon for
color  and  phenol   suggests the possibility of  using
adsorption as  a  pretreatment to biological systems to
remove  toxic, inhibitory and bio-resistant substances.
Adsorption treatment of industrial effluents for selective
removal  of  specific  substances  prior  to  discharge  to
municipal  systems  appears to  be   technically   and
economically feasible in many instances.
                                                           TABLE 3.  RESULTS OF ADSORPTION ISOTHERM
SIC
number
2000


2100


2200


2300



2600



2700





2800



2900






Type of
industry
Food and
kindered
products
Tobacco
manufac-
turers
Textile
mill
products
Apparels
and
allied
products
Paper
and
allied
products
Printing,
publish-
ing and
allied
indus-
tries
Chemicals
and
allied
products
Petrol-
eum
refining
and
related
indus-
tries
Num
testei
16


1


33
28

2



9
1


2






137
13
18

17
3




                                                                                                  Carbon
                                                                  Initial TOC   Initial              exhaustion
                                                       Number    (or phenol),   color,   Average % rate, lb/
                                                                  mg/1         O.D.    reduction  1000 gal
                                                                  25-5,300
                                                                  1,030
                                                                  9-4,670
                                                                  390-875
                                                                  100-3,500   —
                                                                               1.4
                                                                  34-170
                                                                  36-4,400
                                                                  (7-270)
                                  90      0.8-345
                                  97
                                  75
                                  98
                                                                  19-75,500   —         85
                                                                  (0.1-5,325)  —         99
                                                                               0.7-275    98
                                  92
                                  99
58
                                  93      1-246
                       0.1-5.4    97      0.1-83
12-43
                                  90      3.2-156
                                  94      3.7
4.3-4.6
0.7-2,905
1.7-185
1.2-1,328

1.1-141
6-24
                                                      46

-------
TABLE 4. SUMMARY OF ADSORPTION DATA
          ON INDUSTRIAL WASTES
Category

Initial TOC < 100mg/l
Initial TOC =  100-1000 mg/1
Initial TOC =  1,000-10,000 mg/1
Initial TOC > 10,000 mg/1
TOC reduction > 90%
TOC reduction =  85-90%
TOC reduction < 85%
Color reduction > 95%
Color reduction = 90-95%
Color reduction < 90%
Phenol reduction > 99%
Phenol reduction < 99%
Number of samples

        24
       100
        86
        12
       140
        29
        53
        36
         5
         1
        12
         1
   Carbon exhaustion  rates for industrial effluents are
clearly in excess  of those associated with municipal
effluent treatment.  This  is expected, considering the
relative levels of influent  TOC. Municipal effluents can
be successfully treated at costs between 15-40 U.S. cents
per 1,000 gallons.  For the most  part, treatment  of
industrial effluents costs in the dollars per 1,000 gallons
category  for effective  TOC reduction. For selective
removal of color or phenol, treatment costs might well
be in the cents per 1,000 gallons range.
   For certain types of industrial effluents, such as those
from  textile  mill  products  operations, treatment  by
adsorption  alone appears  suitable  to meet organic
removal objectives.  Experience  with textile  effluents
indicates   the possibility  of  water  reuse   following
adsorption treatment.  Such reuse  can offset  pollution
abatement costs. Cost reduction opportunities exist for
TEST ON DIFFERENT INDUSTRIAL WASTES
SIC
number
3000





3100



3200



3300



3400



3700


4200





Type of
industry
Rubber
and
miscel-
laneous
plastic
products
Leather
and
leather
products
Stone,
clay and
glass
products
Primary
metal
indus-
tires
Fab-
ricated
metal
products
Trans-
portation
equipment
Motor
freight
trans-
portation
and ware-
housing
Number
tested
8





2



7



8



1



2


4





                                Initial TOC    Initial
                                (or phenol),   color,
                                mg/1         O.D.

                                120-8,375
                                115-9,000    —




                                12-8,300



                                11-23,000    —



                                73,000




                                190-2,850


                                320-3,480
                    Average %
                    reduction

                       95
          Carbon
          exhaustion
          rate,lb/
          1000 gal.

        5.2-164
                       95
                       87
                       90
                       25
                      91
                      87
        3-315
        2.8-300
        0.5-1,857
        606
          12-361
          20-72
                                                    47

-------
water reuse in many other industrial areas as well. Point
source treatment of specific wastes is also a substantial
factor in the  use of adsorption technology for industrial
waste treatment.

REACTIVATION OF CARBON

   Thermal reactivation of granular activated carbon has
been  a  successful  practice  for several decades.  Rotary
kilns  or  multiple-hearth type  furnaces operated  at
temperatures  between  1600-1800°F  (870-980°C) are
normally  used. The activation  atmosphere  in  these
furnaces is maintained  at low oxygen levels to effect
selective oxidation of  adsorbed  organic  contaminants
rather than of the  activated carbon. Carbon  losses range
between 2-10% per cycle, with larger systems generally
experiencing  smaller losses. Large  systems are normally
designed for  continuous operation, thereby facilitating
control  of the process.
   Afterburners  and  scrubbers  are  used  to  strip the
furnace exhaust gases of air pollutants. Industrial wastes
containing halogens or other corrosive substances require
special materials of construction in the kiln or furnace to
avoid  corrosion problems.  It is  important that  each
industrial effluent be evaluated from this standpoint.
   The  process and  functional  features  of a thermal
reactivation  system are  illustrated in  Figure 4. Detailed
engineering  design features of granular activated carbon
reactivation   systems  are  readily   available   in  the
literal ure.20'21
   Experience with  chemical reactivation  of granular
carbon has been largely  unsuccessful to date. Recovery
of specific by-product adsorbates by extraction has been
demonstrated in  some   instances,  but generally the
carbon  does  not  sufficiently  recover  its  adsorptive
properties. Additionally, by-product recovery frequently
suffers from the fact that the material of interest is in a
waste mixture and a pure product is difficult to recover.
 ADSORBER
    • .••.  »• •  ••  .• •
    V.V.- .••/:••;•'::-:
    i'»« •»"'»•','• '.'•/•'
      I   •••••**<*•
    ft':' .'•'•':•'•:'•••:'•'
          '•'
                                                                                 DEWATERING
                                                                                 SCREW
                                                 FURNACE
                                                 FEED  	
                                                 TANK
                                   FURNACE
                                      t
                       SLURRY PUMP
                                                       48

-------
REFERENCES

 1. Webei,  W.J.,  Jr., Physicochemical  Processes for  Water
    Quality Control,  Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y. 1972.
 2, Weber, W.J.,  Jr., and  Crittenden, J.C.,  MADAM I  - A
    Numeric  Method  for Design of Adsorption Systems, Jour.
    Water Pollution Control Fed., 47, 5, 924 (1975).
 3. Mathews, A.P., and Weber, W.J., Jr., "Mathematical Model-
    ing  of Multicomponent Adsorption Kinetics," Symposium
    on  New  Developments in Adsorption and Ion  Exchange,
    68th Meeting  Amer. Inst. Chem. Engineers,  Los  Angeles,
    CA. Nov. 16-20, 1975.
 4. Deitz, V.R.,  Bibliography of  Solid  Adsorbents,  National
    Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1944.
 5. Libscombe, I7., British Patent 2887, 1862.
 6. Von Ostrejko, R., British Patents 14,224 (1900); 18,040
    (1900). German Patent 136,792 (1901).
 7. Abram,  J.C.,  The characteristics of activated carbon, Pro-
    ceedings, Activated Carbon in  Water Treatment,  Water
    Research Assoc., Medmenham,  Marlow,  Bucks, England,
    1974.
 8. Weber, W.J.,  Jr., Hopkins,  C.B.  and Bloom, R., Jr., A
    Comparison of Expanded-Bed and Packed-Bed Adsorption
    Systems,  Report  No. TWRC-2 U.S. Dept. of the  Interior,
    Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Cincinnati,
    Ohio, 1968.
 9. Morris, J.C. and  Weber,  W.J., Jr., Preliminary Appraisal of
    Advanced Waste Treatment Processes, SEC TR W62-24, U.S.
    Dept. of Health, Education  and Welfare, Public Health
    Service,  R.A.  Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincinnati,
    Ohio, 1962.
10. AWTR-1, Summary  Report -  The Advanced Waste Treat-
    ment Research Program,  999-WP-24,  U.S. Dept.  of Health,
    Education and Welfare,  Public  Health  Service,  R.A.  Taft
    Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1962.
11. AWTR-14, Summary Report - The Advanced Waste Treat-
    ment Research Program,  999-WP-24,  U.S. Dept.  of Health,
    Education and Welfare,  Public  Health  Service,  R.A.  Taft
    Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1965.
12. Weber, W.J., Jr.  and  Kim, J.G., Preliminary  Evaluation of
    The Treatment of Raw Sewage by Coagulation and Adsorp-
    tion,  Technical  Memorandum,  TM-2-65,  San. and Water
    Resources Eng.  Div., The University  of Michigan,  Ann
    Arbor, Michigan, 1965.
13. Rizzo, J.L. and  Schade,  R.E., Secondary Treatment with
    Granular  Activated Carbon, Water and Sewage Works, 116,
    307, 1969.
14. Hager, D.G. and Reilly,  D.B.,  "Clarification-Adsorption In
    The  Treatment  of  Municipal  Waste-waters," Jour. Water
    Pollution Control Fed., 42, 5, 794, 1970.
15. Weber,  W.J.,  Jr., Hopkins,  C.B. and  Bloom,  R.,  Jr.,
    "Physicochemical Treatment of  Wastewater," Jour. Water
    Pollution Control Fed., 42, 1, 83, 1970.
16. Weber, W.J.,  Jr.,  Friedman,  L.D.  and  Bloom,  R.,  Jr.,
    "Biologically-Extended  Physicochemical  Treatment," Pro-
    ceedings  Sixth  Conference on  Water Pollution Research,
    Jerusalem, 18-24 June, 1972.
17. Bishop, D.F.,  O'Farrell, T.P. and Stamberg, J.D., "Physical-
    Chemical Treatment of Municipal  Wastewater, " Jour. Water
    Pollution Control Fed., 44, 3, 361, 1972.
18. Hopkins, C.B., Weber, W.J., Jr. and Bloom, R., Jr., Granular
    Carbon   Treatment   of   Raw  Sewage,   Report   No.
    ORD-17050DAL05/70, Water  Pollution Control Research
    Series,  U.S.  Dept.  of the  Interior, Federal Water Quality
    Administration, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1970.
19.  Hager,  D.G., "Industrial  Wastewater Treatment by Granular
    Activated Carbon, "Indust. Water Engin., 11, 1, 1974.
20.  Smith,  C.E.,  "Principles and Practice of Granular Carbon
    Reactivation," in:  Applications of New Concepts of Physi-
    cal-Chemical Wastewater Treatment, Pergamon Press, Inc.,
    (September 18-22,  1972), pp. 179-184.
21.  Swindell-Dressier Company,  A Division of Pullman  Incor-
    porated Process Design Manual for Carbon Adsorption, for
    the Environmental  Protection Agency, Technology Transfer,
    October, 1971.
                                                           49

-------
                THE REMOVAL OF VOLATILE SUSPENDED SOLIDS FROM WASTEWATERS.
                                          I.N. Miasnikov, B.A. Balakin.
   The process wastewaters from many industries are
contaminated with various volatile  suspended solids. A
great  number  of  these  matters, especially, hydrogen
sulphide,  carbon  sulphide, carbon acid gas, sulphur
dioxide are contained in the wastewaters of chemical
industries.  The wastes  of  sulphate  pulp  industries
contain hydrogen sulphide, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl
sulphide  and dimethyl  disulphide.  A  great number of
volatile matters are also  contained  in  the wastes of oil
refinery industries and oil fields.
   In some cases the volatile suspended  solids are formed
in the wastewater  while its  rendering harmless,  i.g. in
digestion tanks and while using various chemicals at the
waste  treatment  plants. The products  of accessory
reactions in this case are hydrogen sulphide, methane,
carbonic acid gas and etc.
   The  quantity of  volatile  suspended  solids in the
majority  of the above mentioned wastes  exceeds from
0.5 to I g/1. In addition, many of them are toxic even in
low concentrations. For instance, the allowable concen-
tration of carbon  sulphide in the water  of reservoirs is
not higher  than I mg/1, hydrogen sulphide - 0.  The
necessity  of volatile suspended solids  removal  from
wastewaters is due to their toxic influence on biological
treatment  processes, deterioration of  conditions  of
suspended solids settling, atmosphere contamination and
etc. Many  of volatile suspended solids are the valuable
products and their return to  production  is also a great
national economy significance.
   The removal of volatile suspended solids from wastes
is very difficult due to the great amount of waste liquid,
the availability  of many cimponents in the solution to be
treated,  various concentration  of volatile  suspended
solids and mechanical impurities of unequal commodity
value   of  these components,  necessity  of  high  rate
treatment.  The   solution  of  the problem  is  also
complicated, in most cases, by the absence  of data on
physical   and   chemical  parameters   of  wastewater
(density, viscosity etc.), the  data of solubility of gases
and diffusion  factors, which are  necessary to take into
account  in  practical calculations,  associated with the
liquid to be treated.
   At  present  in  most  cases  the  all-plant wastes
contaminated  with volatile suspended solids, enter the
reservoirs  and sewage  treatment facilities  without
preliminary degassing.  The   operation  experience  of
sewage treatment facilities shows that  at the  expense of
natural  degassing  through   the  open   surface  the
satisfactory water  treatment from volatile  suspended
solids  is  not achieved. For instance, the  wastewaters of
chemical  fibre industries after the treatment  facilities
contain some volatile components the quantity of which
several times exceeds sanitary standards.  In addition in
the zone of the treatment plant the contamination of
atmosphere by the products to be treated is observed.
   The  efficiency  of  the  natural  degassing method
through  the  open  water  surface  of  the  treatment
facilities  does not exceed 50-60 per cent.  Even when
using relatively prolonged settling of wastewaters (up to
15  days) the residual  quantity of volatile  suspended
solids  is  3-5  mg/1.  Consequently,  this method of
removing volatile components cannot be recommended
neither for sanitary considerations nor for technical and
economical indices.
   In home  and foreign  practice  various  degassing
processes are used for the removal of volatile suspended
solids from industrial wastes. Water blow-off with, air in
the open channels and  settling  tanks is  used. Blow-off
products often enter the atmosphere.
   For degassing separate categories  of wastewaters and
process solutions the desorbers  with the chord nozzle,
with  the nozzle of  Rashig's rings and hollow spraying
desorbers  are  used. The operation  experience  with
nozzle apparatuses and  cascade  apparatuses shows  that
the rate of degassing of process solutions  at the chemical
fibre  industries  does not exceed 90 per cent. These
apparatuses   are   advisable   to  use  for  wastewater
treatment.
   The degassing of abrasive industries wastewaters from
hydrogen sulphide in the apparatus with the nozzle of
Rashig's  rings  provides, as our scientists  show,  the
elimination  of  dissolved gas  by  95  per  cent.  The
nozzle-type and  the cascade-type apparatuses are  also
advisable to use for the removal of hydrogen sulphide,
mercaptan,  dimethyl sulphide and dimethyl disulphide
from the wastewaters of pulp and paper industries.
   Most  scientists while  considering the performance
of various  desorbers emphasize  the  efficiency of liquid
treatment in the nozzle-type apparatuses. Alongside it is
necessary to note that the presense  of suspended solids
in wastewaters makes the operation of the  nozzle-type
apparatuses  difficult that  limitates their  application
field.
   For the  degassing of  waste  liquid  the temperature
effect is used.  The  wastewaters  are   heated when
increasing density up to the temperature  higher than the
boiling  point,  and  then they  enter the evaporation
chamber though the  reducing valve.
   In the course  of instant  boiling  the degassing alone
takes place.  High-temperature  vapour and gas mixture
formed enters  the  tubular heat exchanger, where  it is
cooled at  the  expense  of  wastewater  flowing to  the
plant.
   The  degassing  of the liquid in  the  apparatuses in
vacuum is used when it is necessary to perform thorough
elimination   of  dissolved gases when  their residual
                                                       50

-------
content is I mg/1.
   One  of  the methods  of dewatering  the volatile
suspended  solids  contained  in  the  liquid,  is  their
transformation  into the non-soluble compounds. Chlori-
nation of wastewater is  used for rendering harmless
hydrogen  sulphide and carbon  sulphide. Chlorinated
lime and chlorine  are  used as chemicals. The oxidation
of carbon sulphide can be performed up to the neutral
sulphur or up  to 863 with  subsequent hydration to
H2S04. For the oxidation of I g of carbon sulphide into
sulphur 0.93  g  of available chlorine is required, and for
the oxidation into 803 - 3.7. The rate of treatment is
dependent on the  weight ratio of carbon sulphide and
chlorine; for example, at the ratio 1:2 it exceeds 50 per
cent,  but at  the ratio 1:8 it exceeds 90 per cent. The
oxidation proceeds in  time.
   The  reaction  of hydrogen sulphide  with  available
chlorine proceeds intensively and is completed with the
formation of sulphur.  At  the ratio of hydrogen sulphide
and chlorine equal to 1:1 in the  acidic medium 65 per
cent of hydrogen sulphide is oxidized in an hour, but in
four hours - 80 per cent.
   One of the  efficient method for rendering  harmless
hydrogen sulphide, methyl  mercaptane and its natrium
salts is their  air oxidation in ordinary conditions in the
presence of catalizers (hydrated oxides and iron oxides,
copper oxides, manganese oxides etc.).
   At the first  stage of oxidation the sulphides of these
metals  are formed, which then are air  oxidized into
subsequent  compounds of  elementary sulphur,  thio-
sulphite and sulphate depending on the ph value.
   As a catalizer graphite is also used which allows the
total oxidation of hydrogen sulphide-methyl mercaptan,
contained in  the liquid, as well as the oxidation of their
natrium  salts  to  thiosulphate  for an hour.   When
catalizers are absent their air oxidation is performed by
50 per cent during 24 hours.
   While considering the given studies and the operation
experience of  industrial apparatuses  it is necessary  to
note, that the  rendering harmless of volatile suspended
solids generally does not exceed the sanitary standard.
   In addition, the published studies  do not contain
sufficient data  describing  the  kinetics  of treatment
process,  as well as its structural design. This makes the
use  of  degassing methods  in  practice  difficult and
necessitates  the usage of subsequent studies with the
purpose  of determination general process parameters  of
overall removal of components from the wastewaters at
minimum consumption of desorber agent, as well as the
specifying of the calculation method for desorbers and
determination  of technical and economical indices  of
degassing installations.
   With  this  purpose  the institute VNII VODGEO  in
cooperation  with  a  number  of  organizations has
accomplished the studies as to desorption of dissolved
gases in the  nozzle-type  apparatuses of  Rashig's rings
with the barbotage layer of liquid, as well as spraying
degassing units. The experiment is realized at pilot-scale
and  full-scale  installations, using real  wastewaters of
various industries.
   When calculating  the  desorption  apparatuses  it  is
necessary to take into account a number of physical and
chemical parameters of wastewater and  the components
to be removed. The absense of these data does not allow
to carry out  the design of degassing works.  That's why
the  attention  was   given  to the  determination  of
quantitative values of density,  viscosity of wastewater,
equilibrium constants  of the components to be removed,
as well  as to the other physical and chemical indices of
liquid and volatile suspended solids.
   The  equilibrium constant  m  is dependent  on the
qualitative  characteristic  of  wastewaters, its  value  is
considerably ranges. The quantitative values of equilib-
rium constants for carbon sulphide, hydrogen  sulphide
and  carbon acid  which  are  in  a  free  state in  the
wastewater,  containing   not   more   than   3   kilo-
moles/cu.m. of  mattars were  determined according to
the following formula:
                                              where
 i^ojm   - the equilibrium constant of the component
for water and wastewaters.
 C -  concentration of the matter to mole/cu.m.
   The  values  of  equilibrium  constants  of  carbon
sulphide  and   hydrogen   sulphide   for   water  and
wastewater from the chemical fibre industries, contain-
ing from O.I to 0.2 moles of the  electrolite  are given in
the table.
   During the operation of desorbers the degree of water
treatment was studied depending on its temperature, pH
value,  concentration  of  volatile  components  and
suspended solids, consumption of liquid and  desorbing
agent, pressure  in  the  apparatus, construction of the
water spraying device, geometric parameters of desorbers
etc.
   The  conducted  studies  allowed   to  establish the
optimum  parameters  of   the   wastewater treatment
process and to determine the desorbers application field.

 Desorption  in  the  nozzle-type  apparatus of Rashig's
 rings.

   The   removal  of volatile  suspended  solids  from
 wastewaters is performed in the apparatus under vacuum
 and at  the atmospheric pressure. As  a nozzle which is
 located in order or conversely the ceramic Rashig's rings
 are used with  dimensions 25 x 25 x 3  and 50 x 50 x 5.
 The liquid supply to the desorber is performed through
 the nozzles  with the outlet opening 5  or 10 mm, being
 located at the height of 0.5 - 0.7 m above the nozzle.
   The  application   of  regulable  nozzles  allows the
uniform distribution of liquid to  the upper  layer  of the
nozzle.
                                                       51

-------
   The desorbing agent is fed under the nozzle through
the  perforated  piping.  When  using  the nozzle  the
conditions of modelling are taken into account, the ratio
of maximum dimension of the element to the desorber
diameter is  less than 0.125, the nozzle  height to the
diameter of the apparatus 5, but the ratio of the nozzle
height to the diameter of the element 40. On the upper
part of the  apparatus at the height of 0.3 m above the
nozzles the  drop removing device  of Rashig's rings is
placed, the dimensions being 25 x 25 x 3, the height of
layer is  0.2 m.  The apparatuses are  operated at  the
nozzle spraying density up to 160 cu.m/sq.m/hr.
   The amount  of the matter  being transformed from
the liquid into  the  gaseous phase  (and conversely) is
determined as to the known mass transfer equation:
        WA= KX.F. A aver.        (I)
where W^ - quantity of desorbed component,
Kx - mass transter factor related to the unit surface con-
     tact of phases;
A - average driving force of the process. The driving force
of the process was determined  according to the formula
widely used in practice:
                                       wheie XjX2 - the concentration of the component at the
                                       outlet and inlet in the apparatus;
                                                   inlet  =
                                                           V
                                                           m
                                                                     V2
                                                          outlet   =  —
                                                                     m
                                           equilibrium concentrations;
                                           m — equilibrium constant.
                                       When \2 K equal to zero and the value Xp inlet is highly
                                       low, the driving force  is determined according  to the
                                       formula:
                                                          Xi-X2

                                                          2.3 Ig   X]                      3
                                  A  aver  =
       A aver  =
                     j-Xp inlet)-(Xc-Xp outlet
                  2.3 1 g
j—Xp inlet

t—Xn outlet
                                         When using the formula (3), the possibility of error as
                                       the calculations showed, is 8: + 4 per cent.
                                         The mass transfer factor is the main parameter, which
                                       characterizes the operation intensity of the desorption
                                       apparatuses. It is dependent on the direction of phases
                                       movement, proportional to the spraying density of the
                                       nozzle in   the  range  of  10-160 cu.m.  sq.m/hr  of
                                       wastewater.  Stable  operation  of  the  apparatus   is
                                       observed when spraying density is not less than  10 cu.m.
                                       sq.m./hr. The nozzle resistance does not exceed 20 mm
                                       Hg.  The   optimum  unit  air  consumption  for  the
                                       apparatus  operation under vacuum is 3 cu.m/sq.m/hr.
     J'htuie  equllib
     (  Figurea  In
        point  of cr.
"'i'    •  ' « vjiurj  fir-  o(i.., mi,   .lnt'cm,  o.  o.ubc'i.  .i;l;iv.(,'~ .
qui'UPL.tj- brebkt, are obtained  u,  ,. ,il cul;>.t ion ueth(.'ii iVr tciipc: ntui'i-  .ibuvr t!rj L',JII'J
,i~V n MUphide)
Naoie oi
liquid
A.+.P-

Lit T, b V.''|-
ter

he aume

*

*

*

i n bar .
md in
HIJ Of
Kerc . coJ
( in bru-
ciie tr _)
/ff/3
(7£0)
/^/3
^»^
«755
^;
0.6-fS
(360J
o 333
/•^;
0.2 13
('*>}
COID-
nontr
St>0
1 S£0
f7se»
2. SIP
2?3SO
3 320
? 1S6
—
72300
—
9 £Q0
"
'f-f/fOO
—
21600
—
33740
—
[33 7ffo]*
—
fss y/oj
—•
fro^o]
896
J20S 100]
•7 530
til 73d] [fa 3 800J
_ !


MO
—
17«j

\
{53 6ooJ\fr9S oool
—
fiasco]
—
jff4 oool

•/460
Qol oooj
2700


—
\3120
{564 oooj\ —
42oo
4800
—
**>
—
Zojo
—
1SSO
—
—
MO

HS40

fSrO

•f9fo\2S3o
1

3C,3o
—
tbSo



6410
-
/4So

24*0
—
->ffHc
—
£i«,
—
4iso
—
-
,'4>>&
—
?S£c.
—

-------
(0.01 m/sec), at normal pressure -10 cu.m/sq.m/hr. The
increase of air velocity in the desorber up to 0.13 m/sec
doesn't practically  influence  the  rate  of wastewater
treatment.
   The  main  quantity  of volatile  components (up to
60-80 per cent) is removed  from the  liquid at the
expense of  the operation of the spraying  devices; the
height of  their location above the nozzle being 0.7 m. In
this  case the liquid  flows to the nozzle with insignificant
amount of gaseous  component. As the wastewater flows
through the nozzle the volatile  products are  removed
from the liquid.
   The  value  Kx is inversely proportional  to  pH.  The
optimum  value during the wastewater treatment in the
apparatus in vacuum is 6.5. The degree  of desorption is
85  per cent.   The  coefficient of  desorption  is  also
dependent on the  vacuum  value, especially at  high
spraying densities.
   The  mass  transfer  intensity  doesn't vary  at  the
increase of the ratio H    / more than 3(H  - the height
of the nozzle,       - diameter of the  apparatus).  The
method of nozzle location doesn't greatly influence the
treatment effect. The presence of suspended solids in the
wastewater which have adhesive  properties  reduces the
time  of the operation  run of the nozzle.  So, for the
treatment   f  wastewaters from  the  chemical  fibre
industries not  more than 80 mg/1 of suspended solids is
allowed  but  for  (hard) solids,  not  having  adhesive
properties, their content may exceed I g/1 and more.
   As a result  of generalization of the experimental data
(when using the theory of similarity and the method of
analysis of dimensions) the following criterion equation
is obtained for the desorption process in the nozzle-type
apparatus:
   a) for carbon sulphide N4 = A.Re °-83. Pr °-5 (4)
   b) for  hydrogen sulphide N4 =  A.ReL26.Pr °-S (5)
where Nr4,Re,Pr  -  the  criteria of Nusselt, Reynolds,
Prandtlja.  The value of the coefficient A is dependent on
the vacuum depth; for carbon sulphide it is in the range
of 3.0  (at 200mmHg)  to 4.5 (at  600 mm Hg): for
hydrogen  sulphide - 0.0 and 0.075 respectively.
   Values  of   Reynold's criterion  index  for  carbon
sulphide   are  confirmed  by  prolonged  operation  of
desorbers  when wastewater treatment. The difference of
indices  is due  to  the  complexity  of  wastewater
composition, to the variety of forms presented in the
components to be removed etc.
   Thus the  given criterion equation allows to determine
by the calculation method the mass transfer factor when
wastewater  treatment.  The   efficiency  of   volatile
components removal exceeds 98  per cent (the residual
content is  less  than 2 mg/1).
   The cost  of treatment of I  cu.m. wastewater in the
nozzle-type  apparatus   operating  in  vacuum  is  0.7
copeck, but  at the atmospheric pressure it is 2 copecks.
The  latter  cost  is obtained  for the  conditions  of
treatment  the  foamy  liquids  in the apparatuses  (the
influent contains foamy substances) and for air supply
by the gas blower. In case of using the fan to feed the
desorbing agent the treatment cost of I cu.m. influent is
only 0.5 copeck.
   When  returning valuable  components to the process
the treatment of influent may become paying.

The desorption in the apparatus with the barbotage layer
of liquid.

   One of the main components which determine the
apparatus  design  and  the  method of rendering  the
volatile contaminants harmless are the suspended solids.
In most  cases  they  have  adhesive  properties; their
concentration  approaches I  g/1 and more that, in turn,
excludes  the  possibility of application such efficient
desorbers as the nozzle-type apparatuses.
   For  rendering  these  wastewaters  harmless  it  is
advisable to use degassors with entire barbotage liquid
layer. They are efficient for removing from wastewaters
weakly soluble gases in which the main resistance during
diffusion is represented by the liquid film. At barbotage
along with the desorption of volatile contaminations the
adsorption  of  oxygen takes  place;  as a result,  the
oxidation processes occur and BOD liquid is reduced in
30-50 per  cent and more, that is very significant when
wastewater rendering harmless.
   To  remove  the   volatile   components  from  the
wastewaters which contain  some amount of suspended
solids it  is advisable to use the apparatuses with the
barbotage layer  of liquid (figure I). The feature of the
apparatus is that  its design provides for  spraying  and
barbotage of the liquid.
   The desorber is in  operation both in vacuum and  at
atmospheric  pressure.  The air  is fed   through  the
removable  barbotage device  with perforated disc, the dia
of openings is  equal  to 1.8  mm.  Similar  as  in  the
nozzle-type apparatus  the  liquid is fed  through  the
variety of nozzles with  10 mm outlet opening.  The
operation  of  nozzles  successfully  provides for foam
reduction; when they  are absent the possibility of the
apparatus  operation   is excluded  when  the  influent
containing surface-active agents is treated in it.
   The apparatus  allows to change (according  to  the
operational conditions) the height of the barbotage layer
of liquid by subsequent erection of pipings (9,11,13).  The
release, of micro bubbles from the liquid, which are go
away from the  barbotage layer takes place  in the vat
(10); the gas obtained enters the apparatus through the
pipings (13).
   The operation  of the desorber  was studied at  the
spraying   density  being 3-66  cu.m/sq.m/hr, and  the
barbotage intensity 16-360 cu.m/sq.m/hr.
   During the  operation along with the other parameters
static ( h st) and working (work) height of liquid layer
barbotage is determined and this allowed to establish gas
content of the layer - the value  ^  , which is the most
                                                       53

-------
important characteristics.
   The average diameter of the air bubble for the above
mentioned wastewater  barbotage conditions may be
assumed as 3.8 mm on the basis of calculations. Contact
surface  of phases when barbotage may be presented as
summary surface of gas bubbles of gas liquid system. In
this case the unit contact surface of phases related to I
cu.m. of the gas liquid layer is determined according to
the known formula:
Contact  surface of  phases, related  to  I  sq.m.  of the
desorber cross-section  is determined according  to the
                       ^  ,  ip-h b