5426
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Mobte Source Enforcement
Division
Washington, DC. 20460
June 1976
Emission
Investigations
Report
OOOR76003
i.nvirj-.3Ge::fcdi 1 r.-section Agency
Rcsiovi \\ Lib;
230 South Daar'boi-n Street
Chic-jgo9 Illinois 6060H
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-------
^^Environmental News
O'Neill (202) 755-0344
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FRIDAY. JUNE 25, 1976
EPA RELEASES REPORT ON AUTO RECALL INVESTIGATIONS
The Office of Enforcement of the Environmental Protection
Agency today issued a report listing all cases of suspected
vehicle emissions problems which were under formal investigation
by the Mobile Source Enforcement Division as of June 1, 1976.
The report lists twenty-five classes of vehicles which
are under investigation for possible recall.
Stanley W. Legro, EPA's Assistant Administrator for
Enforcement, emphasized that: "The fact that a class of
vehicles is under investigation is not reason to conclude
that a recall necessarily will be ordered as a result.
It does mean, however, that emissions data indicate a
potential violation of emissions standards or that some
defect related to emissions controls may exist."
However, EPA's chief enforcement officer stated:
"In those cases where investigation reveals a basis for
recall, we will move promptly to order the recall."
Information bearing on any of the listed investiga-
tions or any emissions problems on classes of vehicles
not listed is solicited from the public.
Persons with information bearing on current "investiga-
tions or additional emissions-related problems are invited
to write to: Director, Mobile Source Enforcement Division
(EN-340), 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460.
(more)
Return this sheet if you do NOT wish to receive this material O, or if change of address is needed G (indicate change, including zip code).
EPA FORM 1510-1 (REV. 8-72)
R-175
-------
-2-
Reports should indicate the make, model, year and
serial number (VIN) of the vehicle, if known, and all
facts related to the suspected problem.
-------
EMISSIONS INVESTIGATIONS REPORT
The Office of Enforcement, Environmental Protection
Agency, through its Mobile Source Enforcement Division, has
undertaken formal investigations of those vehicle classes
listed in this Report for possible noncompliance with air
pollutant emissions standards. The authority for this
investigative activity is section 207(c) of the Clean Air
Act which provides that if a substantial number of vehicles
of any class, although properly maintained and used, do not
conform to the emissions standards when in actual use, the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall
order the manufacturer to recall the vehicles to remedy the
nonconformity.
The Environmental Protection Agency is constantly alert
for the existence of possible nonconformities and seeks
information about possible emissions noncompliance through a
number of programs. Informal .investigation activities are
ongoing at all times. In many of these, a preliminary
inquiry indicates that there is not a sufficient basis for
going forward. However, where based upon the preliminary
inquiry a decision is made that a formal investigation
should be initiated, the manufacturer is notified in writing,
the formal investigation is begun and is listed in the
Environmental Protection Agency Emissions Investigations
Report,
The fact that a class is under investigation should not
be cause to assume that noncompliance, in fact, exists or
that a recall determination will be made. A formal investigation
is initiated when an emissions-related problem has been
indicated, either by the report of a defect or the receipt
of emissions data, and sufficient information exists to
warrant a formal recall investigation. The aim of a formal
investigation is to collect additional information, to
determine the extent and, if possible, the cause of non-
conformities, and to determine if the recall of that class
of vehicles is appropriate. The Agency will make public its
conclusions upon completion of each formal investigation-
-------
EPA solicits from the public any pertinent information
relating to the cases listed. Persons with information
bearing on current investigations or other indications of
possible emissions nonconformities are invited to write to:
Director, Mobile Source Enforcement Division (EN-340)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Reports should indicate the make, model, year and
serial number (VIN) of the vehicle, if known, and all
pertinent facts relating to the suspectofd problem.
Stanley *Vif. Legi
Assistant Administrator for Enforcement
-------
INVESTIGATIONS
For the purposes of this report, MSED considers a possible
emissions-related problem to be an "investigation" during the
period when information about the potential problem is being
actively solicited by the Agency through surveys of vehicle
owners or users, when testing and data analysis are being per-
formed, or whiJLo- manufacturers' data are under review. As will
be seen from the report, EPA conducts investigations involving
an identifiable component defect as well as investigations in
which no defect has been identified but where emissions levels
are suspected of exceeding the standards. EPA is interested in
receiving any pertinent information in either of those two areas
Cases of Suspected Emissions-Related Problems
Under Investigation as of June 1, 1976
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-6
American Motors
Pacers with 232 and 258 CID engines
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide
(CO) emissions
Undetermined
ISIone obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year :
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-3
Chrysler
318 and 360 CID engines
1974
Excessive hydrocarbon (KG)
and carbon nonoxide (CO) emission;
Undetermined
Vehicle may fail State emissions
tests
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms;
75-7
Chrysler
Chryslers, Plyruouths and Dodges,
all v;ith catalyst-equipped 360
or 400 CID engines
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide
(CO) emissions
Undetermined
Hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg)
odor; vehicle may fail State
emissions test
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-22
Chrysler
198 and 225 CID engines
1973
Excessive carbon monoxide
(CO) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOx) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
CID
318
440
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
76-20
Chrysler
Chryslers with one of the following
engine CID and carburetion com-
binations:
Carburetor
1 barrel
4 barrel
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide (CO)
and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions
Overly rich carburetion at idle
Hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg) odor;
vehicle may fail State emissions
test
Case No,:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Eini-sSions Problem:
Potential Causa:
Apparent Symptoms:
76-21
Chrysler
318 CID (noncatalyst) engines
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide
(CO) emissions
Carburetor defect
None obvious'to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Years:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Causei
Apparent Symptoms:
76-1
General Motors
Pontiacs with V-3 engines
Late 1973,- all 1974
Excessive oxides of nitrogen.
(NOx) emissions
Failure of cold temperature
thermal vacuum valve
None obvious to driver
Case No;:
Manufactuer:
Vehicle Class:
Years:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Syrr.ptons:
76-2
General l-loiiors
Chevrolet Vegas with 140 CID
engines
1972, 197.3r 1974
Excessive hydrocarbon (HC)
and carbon ir.onoxide (CO) ernissioi
Excessive oil consumption
possibly as a result of valve
stem oil seal failure, cylinder
wall scoring or other causes
High oil consumption
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
76-11
General Motors
Chevrolets with 400 CID engines and
4 barrel carburetors: Monte Carlo,
Chevelle, Belair, Impala, Caprice,
El Camino
1975
Excessive oxides of nitrogen
(NOx) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem;
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
76-12
•
General Motors
Pontiacs with catalyst-equipped
350 and 400 CID engines
1975
Excessive oxides of nitrogen
(NOx)
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
CID
350
400
455
350
455
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
76-18
General Motors
Pontiacs with one of the following
engine CID and carburetion
combinations:
Carburetor
2 barrel
2 or 4 barrel
4 barrel
Oldsmobiles with one of the
following combinations:
4 barrel
4 barrel
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide (CO)
and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions
Overly rich carburetion at idle
Hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg)
odor; vehicle may fail State
emissions test
Case No. :
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Years:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-20
Toyo Kogyo
Mazdas with 70 CID rotary
engines: RX2, RX3
1973, 1974
Excessive hydrocarbon (HC) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptons:
76-19
Ford
Fords with 460 CID engines and
4 barrel carburetors
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide (CO)
and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions
Overly rich carburetion at idle
Hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg)
odor; vehicle may fail State
emissions test
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-5
General Motors
Cadillacs with 500 CID engines:
Brougham,, Calais, DeVille,
Eldorado, Fleetwood
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide
(CO) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Causa:
Apparent Syraptoras:
76-22
Chrysler
225 CID catalyst-equipped engines
1975
Excessive carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions
Carburetor misadjustment
Hydrogen, sulfide (rotten egg)
odor; vehicle nay fail State
emissions test
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problems:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-8A
Ford
Ford Mavericks, Granadas and
Mustangs and Mercury Comets and
Monarchs, all with 250 CID EGR/AIR
(non-catalyst) engines
1975
Excessive carbon raonoxids (CO)
emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-8B
Ford
Ford Maveri'c*ks, Granadas and Mustangs
and Mercury Comets and Monarchs, all
with 302 CID EGR/AIR (non-catalyst)
engines
1975
Excessive hydrocarbon (HC)
emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-18
Ford
351C CID engines with 4 barrel
carburetors
1973
Excessive hydrocarbon (HC)
and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
Case No.
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-19
Ford
Ford Torinos, Mustangs, Rancheros,
Customs, Galaxie 500s, LTDs, Country
Sedans and Squires and Mercury
Montegos, all v/ith 351C CID engines
and 2 barrel carburetors
1973
Excessive carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible EiTilssions Problem.:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
76-5
Ford
Ford Custon 500s, Galaxie 500s,
LTDs, and Torinos and Mercury
Cougars and Hontegos, all with
351V7 CID, engines and 2 barrel
carburetors
1974
Excessive carbon monoxide (CO)
and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Feasible Emissions
76-15B
Ford
Fords, and Mercurys with 351W CID
engines: Ford Granada, F-100
Torino, Elite„ and Ranchero and
Mercury Monarch, Montego and Couga:
1975
Excessive oxide
(NOx) en-^ .iti.o ••
,:i hrog^vs
-------
Case No.
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Years:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-1
Toyota
Coronas, Celicas and HiLux
Pickups, all with 18 R-C engines
1972, 1973
Excessive hydrocarbon
(HC) emissions
Valve burning
Poor driveability (hard starting,
low power, engine overheating)
Case No.
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
76-13
Toyota
Corollas with 97 CID (1600cc)
engines and Coronas, Celicas and
Hilux pickups all with 133 CID
(2200cc) engines
1975
Excessive oxides of .nitrogen
(NOx) and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
-------
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Year:
Possible Emissions Problem
Potential Symptoms:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-21
Volkswagen
97 CID engines
1974
Excessive hydrocarbon (HC) and
carbon monoxide (CO) emissions
Undetermined
None obvious to driver
Case No.:
Manufacturer:
Vehicle Class:
Years:
Possible Emissions Problems:
Potential Cause:
Apparent Symptoms:
75-13
Volvo
Volvo 142, 144, 145, and 164 and
P-1800
1972, 1973
Excessive evaporative
hydrocarbon (HC) emissi6ns
Rubber deterioration allows fuel
leakage especially after lack of
use in cold weather for several day
None obvious to driver
Agency
T^orr ?' Q-'^ Yf 1 -^ j^cA"1"/
230 South Dearborn Street
Chlce.qoB Illinois 6060H
-------
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OFFIC IAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
POSTAGE AND FEES F^AID
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
EPA-335
------- |